請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73828
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林奇秀(Chi-Shiou Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yen-Chiao Chan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 詹硯喬 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:11:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-09 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-10-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Babbie, E. (2004). 研究方法:基礎理論與技巧(The basics of social research, 2nd ed.)(邱泯科、陳佳穎、蔡毓智、姜馨彥譯)。臺北市:湯姆生。(原作2002年出版)
Bi the way.拜坊(2014)。Bi the Way團體簡介暨雙性戀問答(2013年版)。檢索自:http://bitheway.pixnet.net/blog/post/43701394 Fifi(2014)。老師(妙麗式舉手),女同志一定會死床嗎?。 Queerology。檢索自:http://queerology.net/2014/03/les-bed-death/ Flick, U. (2007). 質性研究導論(Qualitative sozialforscfhung, 2nd ed.)(李政賢、廖志恒、林靜如譯)。臺北市:五南。(原作2002年出版) Franwu(2011)。臺灣同志文學最低閱讀書目。檢索自:http://blog.roodo.com/franwu/archives/18045963.html Hofmann(2016年10月28日)。同性戀並非疾病 立委林靜儀提倡禁止性傾向扭轉治療。The News Lens關鍵評論。檢索自:https://www.thenewslens.com/article/52696 InMind(2016年2月5日)。同志平權成功了?你先看看這些「溫馨有愛」的歧視用語吧。The News Lens關鍵評論。檢索自:https://www.thenewslens.com/article/35698 Kumar, R. (2000). 研究方法:步驟化學習指南(Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners.)(潘中道、黃瑋瑩、胡龍騰譯)。臺北市:學富文化。(原作1999年出版) Lescholar(2012a)。LGB人口。檢索自:http://lescholar.pixnet.net/blog/post/76205436-lgb%E4%BA%BA%E5%8F%A3 Lescholar(2012b)。學術界:同性戀不是一種疾病。檢索自:http://lescholar.pixnet.net/blog/post/76507914-%E5%AD%B8%E8%A1%93%E7%95%8C%3A%E5%90%8C%E6%80%A7%E6%88%80%E4%B8%8D%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%80%E7%A8%AE%E7%96%BE%E7%97%85 Meem,D. T., Gibson, M. A., & Alexander, J. F. (2012),發現女同性戀、男同性戀、雙性戀與跨性別研究(Finding out: an introduction to LGBT studies)(葉宗顯、黃元鵬譯)。新北市:韋伯文化國際。(原作2010年出版) Slavin, R. E. (2013). 教育心理學 : 理論與實際(第三版)(Educational psychology: theory and practice, 10th ed.)(張文哲譯)。新北市:臺灣培生教育。(原作2012年出版) Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.(1997)。質性研究概論(Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques)(徐宗國譯)。臺北市:巨流。(原作1990年出版) Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.(2001)。質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法(Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed.)(吳芝儀、廖梅花譯)。嘉義市:濤石文化。(原作1998年出版) Tapcpr(2013)。關鍵的十年,關鍵的1/4 同性婚姻民調結果發佈記者會 新聞稿。臺灣伴侶權益推動聯盟。檢索自:https://tapcpr.wordpress.com/2013/08/06/%E3%80%90%E9%97%9C%E9%8D%B5%E7%9A%84%E5%8D%81%E5%B9%B4%EF%BC%8C%E9%97%9C%E9%8D%B5%E7%9A%8414-%E5%90%8C%E6%80%A7%E5%A9%9A%E5%A7%BB%E6%B0%91%E8%AA%BF%E7%B5%90%E6%9E%9C%E7%99%BC%E4%BD%88%E8%A8%98/ 公投票全數開畢!史上首次7公投案壓倒性高票過關!(2018年11月25日)。自由時報。檢索自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/2623257 王雅各(1999)。臺灣男同志平權運動史。臺北市:開心陽光。 王榮祥、鍾麗華(2015年5月12日)。同志婚給名份 高市戶政擬註記。自由時報。檢索自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/879594 白先勇(1983)。孽子。臺北市:遠景。 同婚爭議:回顧臺灣爭取同婚合法化30年歷程(2017年5月24日)。東網。檢索自:https://hk.on.cc/tw/bkn/cnt/news/20170524/bkntw-20170524160305851-0524_04011_001.html 朱偉誠(1998)。臺灣同志運動的後殖民思考:論“現身”問題。臺灣社會研究季刊, 30,35–62。 吳翠松(2001)。報紙中的同志:十五年來臺灣同性戀議題報導的解析。載於何春蕤(主編),同志研究(89–116頁)。臺北市:巨流。 吳馨恩(2015年6月21日)。女同志較不易被歧視嗎?。公民行動影音紀錄資料庫。檢索自:https://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/33128 呂嘉鴻、李宗憲(2019年5月17日)。同性婚姻:台灣通過亞洲首部專法 同志結婚登記亮綠燈。BBC中文網。檢索自:https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-48306662 卓耕宇、瑪達拉.達努巴克(2012)。多元性別與同志教育。載於黃淑玲、游美惠(主編),性別向度與臺灣社會(第二版,131–162頁)。高雄市:巨流。 周華山(1997a)。同志論(第二版)。香港:香港同志研究社。 周華山(1997b)。後殖民同志。香港:香港同志研究社。 性別平等教育法(民93年6月23日)。檢索自:全國法規資料庫,http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0080067 林賢修(1997)。看見同性戀?。臺北市:開心陽光。 法律白話文運動(無日期)。婚姻平權與同志權益。檢索自:https://plainlaw.me/anthology/marriage-equality/ 柯采新(Calhoun, C.)(1997)。同女出走(張娟芬譯)。臺北市:女書文化。 紀大偉編(1997)。酷兒啟示錄。臺北市:元尊文化。 美國心理學會(2008)。解答你的問題:深入理解性傾向和同性戀(Answers to your questions for a better understanding of sexual orientation and homosexuality)。華盛頓:美國心理學會。檢索自:http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/chinese-orientation.pdf 美國心理學會(2011)。解答你的問題:關於跨性別者、性別認同及性別表達(Answers to your questions about transgender people, gender identity, and gender expression)。華盛頓:美國心理學會。檢索自:http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/chinese-transgender.pdf 胡郁盈(2017)。從「現身」到「關係」:臺灣性別社會變遷與女同志親子協商。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,40,107–151。 孫中興(2015)。廿世紀美國社會學理論:第十七講 高夫曼(二)(開放式課程講義)。臺北市:國立臺灣大學。檢索自:http://ocw.aca.ntu.edu.tw/ocw_files/103S202/103S202_AA17L01.pdf 婚姻平權大平臺(無日期)。了解婚姻平權—議題二:你真的了解同性戀嗎?。檢索自:http://equallove.tw/questions/14 張小虹、鄭美里(2019)。突破異性戀機制的壟斷——女同志理論。載於顧燕翎(主編),女性主義理論與流變(311-349頁)。臺北市:貓頭鷹出版。 張娟芬(2001)。愛的自由式:女同志故事書。臺北市:時報文化。 張娟芬(2011)。姊妹戲牆:女同志運動學。臺北市:時報文化。 畢恆達(2003)。男同性戀與父母:現身的考量、策略、時機與後果。女學學誌,15,37–78。 章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊(2013)。臺灣社會變遷基本調查計畫第六期第三次調查計畫執行報告(計畫編號:NSC 100-2420-H-001-002-SS2)。臺北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。 莊瑞君(2009)。徘徊得與失之間:女同志向家人現身的歷程(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學心理輔導教育研究所,屏東縣。 莊瑞君、陳慶福、劉安真(2011)。女同志向家人現身歷程之敘說研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,29,71–104。 陳坤虎、雷庚玲、吳英璋(2005)。不同階段青少年之自我認同內容及危機探索之發展差異。中華心理學刊,47(3),249–268。 陳炳宏(2016年12月26日)。高度爭議法案 反同婚團體:冷靜下來,事緩則圓。自由時報。檢索自:http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1928498 陳素秋(2016)。雙性戀認同形成理論之反思:以網路年輕世代為例。臺灣性學學刊,22(1),81–111。 陳培驊(2006)。見與不見-同志現身經驗的研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立東華大學族群關係與文化研究所,花蓮縣。 陳耀宗(2016年10月29日)。護家盟反同婚:1個男同志一生有千名以上性伴侶 收養孩子隨時會被拋棄。風傳媒。檢索自:http://www.storm.mg/article/183428 陸子鈞(2014年1月22日)。同志的比例到底有多少?。泛科學PanSci。檢索自:http://pansci.asia/archives/79078 喀飛(2015年10月30日)。臺灣同志運動的歷史回顧。苦勞網。檢索自:http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/83827 喀飛、林佑軒、馬翊航、陳栢青、陳韋臻、張瑜、……邵祺邁(2017)。以進大同:臺北同志生活誌。臺北市:財團法人臺灣文學發展基金會。 喬瑟芬(2016年11月25日)。喬瑟芬:台灣同運的軌跡與阻力(上)。端傳媒。檢索自:https://theinitium.com/article/20151104-opinion-twtongzhi-qiaosefen-01/ 曾寶瑩(2016)。同性戀佔臺灣社會至少5%人口,他們可能就是還沒對你出櫃的家人。The News Lens關鍵評論。檢索自:https://www.thenewslens.com/article/55986 游美惠(2014)。性別教育小詞庫。高雄市:巨流。 黃仲丘(2016年11月30日)。宗教界大串聯反同婚修法 網友:圍攻光明頂嗎。蘋果日報。檢索自:http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20161130/1000825/ 黃玲蘭(2005)。從「同性戀認同歷程」談女同志的現身壓力與因應策略。元培學報,12,33–51。 黃淑玲(2012)。男子性與男子氣概。載於黃淑玲、游美惠(主編),性別向度與臺灣社會(第二版,345–371頁)。高雄市:巨流。 楊文山、李怡芳(2016)。步入成人初期之臺灣年輕人性傾向之研究。調查研究-方法與應用,35,47–79。 葉乃靜(2011)。資訊人的意義建構。載於日常生活中的資訊人(167–206頁)。臺北市:文華。 管仁健(2016年12月5日)。兩個北一女資優生相約自殺以後。新頭殼。檢索自:http://newtalk.tw/news/view/2016-12-05/79741 臺大女同性戀文化研究社(1995)。我們是女同性戀。臺北市:碩人。 臺灣同志諮詢熱線協會(2007)。出櫃停看聽:同志子女必讀寶典。臺北市:女書文化。 臺灣同志諮詢熱線協會(2015)。2015認識同志摺頁。檢索自: https://hotline.org.tw/sites/hotline.org.tw/files/field_upload/2015認識同志摺頁反面.pdf 臺灣伴侶權益推動聯盟(無日期)。多元成家—草案簡介。臺灣伴侶權益推動聯盟。檢索自:https://tapcpr.org/freedom-to-marry/draft-intro 臺灣酷家家編(2017)。出櫃 (come out) 是什麼意思?英文該怎麼說?。臺灣酷家。檢索自:https://www.lgbtq.tw/%E3%80%8C%E5%87%BA%E6%AB%83%E3%80%8D%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC%E6%84%8F%E6%80%9D%EF%BC%9F/ 趙彥寧(1996)。性、性意識及身體建構—型塑臺灣女同性戀的身體美學。載於第一屆性教育.性學.性別暨同性戀研究研討會(101–123頁)。桃園縣〔桃園市〕:中央大學英文系性/別研究室。 趙彥寧(1997)。出櫃或不出櫃?這是一個有關黑暗的問題。騷動,3,59–64。 趙彥寧(2000)。臺灣同志研究的回顧與展望-一個關於文化生產的分析。臺灣社會研究季刊,38,207–244。 趙淑珠、郭麗安、劉安真(2008)。認識同志教育資源手冊。臺北市:教育部。檢索自: http://www.airitibooks.com/pdfViewer/index.aspx?PublicationID=P20110713005&GoToPage=-1 劉子維(2017年8月20日)。臺灣同婚推手祁家威:「我不是自己要結婚」。BBC中文網。檢索自:http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-40048682%0A. 劉安真(2001)。「女同志」性認同形成歷程與污名處理之分析研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系,彰化縣。 劉安真、程小蘋、劉淑慧(2002)。「我是雙性戀,但選擇做女同志!」~兩位非異性戀女性的性認同形成歷程。中華輔導學報,12,153–183。 劉杏元、黃玉、趙淑員(2009)。當性別遇見同志:女同志性取向認同發展相關理論探討。長庚科技學刊,10,137–153。 劉亮雅導讀(2010)。同志研究。臺北市:行政院文建會。 蔡天怡(2015)。圖書資訊學領域學生如何說出「資訊」的故事:視覺方法之探索性研究。圖書資訊學研究,10(1),123-169。 蔡沛彣(2014)。女雙性戀認同、實踐與處境之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學性別研究所,高雄市。 鄭美里(1997)。女兒圈:臺灣女同志的性別、家庭與圈內生活。臺北市:女書文化。 薇真(2013)。真的很不一樣--FTM。簡介這些那些。跨性別punk。檢索自: http://transgenderspunk.blogspot.com/2013/11/ftm.html 謝孟穎(2018年11月24日)。台灣人權史上最黑暗一天!反同勢力大獲全勝 同婚同志教育5項公投全拿下。風傳媒。檢索自:https://www.storm.mg/article/650119 簡家欣(1997)。喚出女同志:九○年代臺灣女同志的論述形構與運動集結(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學社會學系,臺北市。 簡家欣(1998)。九○年代臺灣女同志的認同建構與運動集結:在刊物網絡上形成的女同志新社群。臺灣社會研究季刊,30,63–115。 蘇詠絮、張滿玲、鍾昆原(2013)。欲說還休,欲說還休:從辯證觀看華人成年初期的子女對父母的自我揭露。應用心理研究,58,15–65。 Adams, S. S., & Peirce, K. (2006). Is there a transgender canon?: Information seeking and use in the transgender community. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Canadian Association of Information Science (pp. 1–7). Toronto, Canada. Atkinson, D. R., Morten, G., & Sue, D. W. (1979). Counseling American minorities: A cross-cultural perspective. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown. Becker, R. (1998). Prime-time television in the gay nineties: Network television, quality audiences, and gay politics. The Velvet Light Trap, 42, 36–47. Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. S. (1978). Homosexualities: A study of diversity among men and women. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. (1981). Sexual preference: Its development in men and women. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Birkelund, R., & Larsen, L. S. (2012). Patient-patient interaction--caring and sharing. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27(3), 608–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01072.x Bohan, J. S. (1996). Psychology and sexual orientation: Coming to terms. New York, NY: Routledge. Bok, S. (1983). Secrets: On the ethics of concealment and revelation. New York, NY: Vintage Books. doi: 10.1002/pam.4050030250 Bond, B. J., Hefner, V., & Drogos, K. L. (2009). Information-seeking practices during the sexual development of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: The influence and effects of coming out in a mediated environment. Sexuality & Culture, 13(1), 32–50. doi: 10.1007/s12119-008-9041-y Brown, L. S. (1995). Lesbian identities: Concepts and issues. In A. R. D’Augelli & C. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives (pp. 3–23). New York, NY: Oxford University. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195082319.003.0001 Case, D. O. (2012). Information behavior: An introduction. In Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (3rd ed., pp. 3–16). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. Cass, V. C. (1979). Homosexual identity formation: A theoretical model. Journal of Homosexuality, 4(3), 219–235. doi: 10.1300/J082v04n03_01 Cass, V. C. (1984a). Homosexual identity: A concept in need of definition. Journal of Homosexuality, 9(2–3), 105–126. doi: 10.1300/J082v09n02_07 Cass, V. C. (1984b). Homosexual identity formation: Testing a theoretical model. The Journal of Sex Research, 20(2), 143–167. doi: 10.1080/00224498409551214 Chapman, B. E., & Brannock, J. C. (1987). Proposed model of lesbian identity development: An empirical examination. Journal of Homosexuality, 14(3–4), 69–80. doi: 10.1300/J082v14n03_05 Chatman, E. A. (1991). Life in a small world: Applicability of gratification theory to information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(6), 438–449. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199107)42:6<438::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-B Chatman, E. A. (1996). The impoverished life-world of outsiders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(3), 193–206. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199603)47:3<193::AID-ASI3>3.3.CO;2-M Chatman, E. A. (1999). A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 207–217. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:3<207::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-8 Coleman, E. (1982). Developmental stages of the coming-out process. The American Behavioral Scientist, 25(4), 469–482. doi: 10.1300/J082v07n02_06 Creelman, J. A. E., & Harris, R. M. (1990). Coming out: The information needs of lesbians. Collection Building, 10(3–4), 37–41. doi: 10.1108/eb023281 Cross, W. E. J. (1971). The negro-to-black conversion experience: Toward a psychology of black liberation. Black World, 20, 13–27. Downing, N. E., & Roush, K. L. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13(4), 695–709. doi: 10.1177/0011000085134013 Foster, A., & Ford, N. (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 321–340. doi: 10.1108/00220410310472518 Fulton, C. (2005). Chatman’s life in the round. In K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. (E. F.) McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 79–82). Medford, NJ: Published for the American Society for Information Science and Technology by Information Today. Garnar, M. (2000). Changing times: Information destinations of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community in Denver, Colorado. Retrieved from http://www.libr.org/isc/articles/12-Garnar.html Goode, E. (1984). Deviant behavior (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Gramick, J. (1984). Developing a lesbian identity. In D. T. & P. S. (Eds.), Women-identified women (pp. 31–44). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield. Grov, C., Bimbi, D. S., Nanín, J. E., & Parsons, J. T. (2006). Race, ethnicity, gender, and generational factors associated with the coming‐out process among gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals. The Journal of Sex Research, 43(2), 115–121. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552306 Hamer, J. S. (2003). Coming-out: Gay males’ information seeking. School Libraries Worldwide, 9(2), 73–89. Humphreys, L. (1972). Out of the closets: The sociology of homosexual liberation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hunter, S., Shannon, C., Knox, U., & Martin, J. I. (1998). Coming out. In Lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths and adults: Knowledge for human services practice (pp. 57–67). California: Sage. Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. London & New York: Routledge. Kitzinger, C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 339–355. doi: 10.1108/eb026918 Lockard, D. (1986). The lesbian community: An anthropological approach. Journal of Homosexuality, 11(3–4), 83–95. doi: 10.1300/J082v11n03_06 Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551–558. Martin, H. J. Jr., & Murdock, J. R. (2007). Serving lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning teens : A how-to-do-it manual for librarians. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers. McCarn, S. R., & Fassinger, R. E. (1996). Revisioning sexual minority identity formation: A new model of lesbian identity and its implications for counseling and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 24(3), 508–534. doi: 10.1177/0011000096243011 McKenzie, P. J. (2003). A model of information practices in accounts of everyday‐life information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 59(1), 19–40. doi: 10.1108/00220410310457993 Morales, E. S. (1989). Ethnic minority families and minority gays and lesbians. Marriage & Family Review, 14(3-4), 217–239. doi: 10.1300/J002v14n03_11 Niemelä, R. (2006). Ikääntyneiden informaatiokäyttäytyminen – Laadullinen tutkimus arkielämän informaatiokäytännöistä ja toimintaan aktivoitumisesta. [Information behaviour of older adults: Qualitative study on information practices and enactment in everyday life]. Oulu, Finland: Oulun yliopisto. Nova Scotia Advisory Council on the Status of Women. (1996). Letting in a little light: Lesbians and their families in Nova Scotia, an illuminated manuscript. Nova Scotia, Canada: Nova Scotia Advisory Council on the Status of Women. Ossana, S. M., Helms, J. E., & Leonard, M. M. (1992). Do “womanist” identity attitudes influence college women’s self-esteem and perceptions of environmental bias? Journal of Counseling and Development, 70(3), 402–408. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01624.x Plummer, K. (1975). Sexual stigma: An interactionist account. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Pohjanen, A. M., & Kortelainen, T. A. M. (2016). Transgender information behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 72(1), 172–190. doi: 10.1108/JD-04-2015-0043 Reynolds, A. I., & Pope, R. L. (1991). The complexities of diversity: Exploring multiple oppressions. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70(1), 174–180. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01580.x Saghir, M. T., & Robins, E. (1973). Male and female homosexuality: A comprehensive investigation. Baltimore, MD: The Williams & Wilkins Company. Saltzburg, S. (2011). Coming out as lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 468–478). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1695-2_135 Saracevic, T. (1999). Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1051–1063. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1051::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Z Savin-Williams, R. C. (1996). Self-labeling and disclosure among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth. In J. Laird & R. J. Green (Eds.), Lesbians and gays in couples and families (pp. 153–182). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Savin-Williams, R. C. (2006). Who’s gay? Does it matter? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(1), 40–44. Savolainen, R. (2007). Information behavior and information practice: Reviewing the “umbrella concepts” of information-seeking studies. The Library Quarterly, 77(2), 109–132. doi: 10.1086/517840 Schäfer, S. (1976). Sexual and social problems among lesbians. The Journal of Sex Research, 12, 50–69. doi: 10.1080/00224497609550921 Schaller, S. (2011). Information needs of LGBTQ college students. Libri, 61(2), 100–115. doi: 10.1515/libr.2011.009 Shils, E. (1957). Primordial, personal, sacred and civil ties: Some particular observations on the relationships of sociological research and theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 8(2), 130–145. doi: 10.2307/587365 Solomon, P. (1997). Discovering information behavior in sense making. I. Time and timing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(12), 1097–1108. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199712)48:12<1097::AID-ASI4>3.3.CO;2-9 Solomon, P. (1997). Discovering information behavior in sense making. II. The social. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(12), 1109–1126. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199712)48:12<1109::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-Y Solomon, P. (1997). Discovering information behavior in sense making. III. The person. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(12), 1127–1138. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199712)48:12<1127::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-W Solomon, P. (2002). Discovering information in context. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 229–264. doi: 10.1002/aris.1440360106 Sophie, J. (1986). A critical examination of stage theories of lesbian identity development. Journal of Homosexuality, 12(2), 39–51. Doi: 10.1300/J082v12n02_03 Stenback, T. L., & Schrader, A. M. (1999). Venturing from the closet: A qualitative study of the information needs of lesbians. Public Library Quarterly, 17(3), 37–50. doi: 10.1300/J118v17n03_04 Talja, S. (2002). Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. New Review of Information Behavior Reasearch, 3(1), 143–159. Taylor, J. K. (2002). Targeting the information needs of transgender individuals. Current Studies in Librarianship, 26(1&2), 85–109. Theodorson, G. A., & Theodorson, A. G. (1969). A modern dictionary of sociology. New York, NY: Thomas Y. Crowell. Troiden, R. R. (1977). Becoming homosexual: Research on acquiring a gay identity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Troiden, R. R. (1989). The formation of homosexual identities. Journal of Homosexuality, 17(1–2), 43–74. doi: 10.1300/J082v17n01_02 UNC Safe Zone (2001). Sexual Identity: The Cass model. Retrieved from: http://multicultural.usf.edu/pdf/safezone/support_identity.pdf. Wang, F. T. Y., Bih, H. D., & Brennan, D. J. (2009). Have they really come out: Gay men and their parents in Taiwan. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(3), 285-296. doi: 10.1080/13691050802572711 Warren, C. A. B. (1974). Identity and community in the gay world. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Weinberg, M. S., & Williams, C. J. (1974). Male homosexuals: Their problems and adaptations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Whitt, A. J. (1993). The information needs of lesbians. Library & Information Science Research, 15(1), 275–288. Williamson, K. (1998). Discovered by chance: The role of incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Library & Information Science Research, 20(1), 23–40. doi: 10.1016/S0740-8188(98)90004-4 Wilson, T. D. (1997). Information behaviour: An interdisciplinary perspective. Information Processing and Management, 33(4), 551–572. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00028-9 Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Information Science Research, 3(2), 49–55. Yeh, N.-C. (2008). The social constructionist viewpoint on gays and lesbians, and their information behaviour. Information Research, 13(4). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73828 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來臺灣的同志運動有著明顯進展,同志能見度也大幅提高,但即使在同性婚姻通過的今日,同志族群在社會上也仍承受著污名與歧視,而在父權社會與異性戀主流社會當中,女同志族群承受著「女性」與「同志」的雙重壓力,本研究意欲了解女同志個體在這樣的背景下如何建構自我同志認同。本研究運用前人的認同╱出櫃過程模型作為輔助,觀察女同志在認同╱出櫃過程中有哪些資訊行為,並以此提出四個研究問題,分別與女同志個體之同志認同╱出櫃歷程、資訊需求與問題情境、資訊尋求行為,以及資訊使用有關。
本研究使用紮根理論研究法,訪談15位自我認同為女同性戀之臺灣女同志。本研究根據訪談資料輔以前人文獻,將受訪者之同志認同╱出櫃歷程分為三條支線,分別為同志自我認同、對他人出櫃以及群體認同過程。在其認同╱出櫃歷程之中,受訪者曾有的資訊需求與問題情境包含三大類別,分別與自我、與他人關係,以及與同志群體相關。而受訪者在認同初期,其資訊需求多著重在自我,而後才會擴展至他人與群體相關之資訊需求。 針對上述資訊需求與問題情境,受訪者會使用的資訊管道與來源主要分為四大類,包含親密人際網絡、外圍他人、大眾媒體,以及機構與實體場域,其中最常使用的資訊管道與來源為親密人際網絡中的同志朋友,外圍他人中的同志網友或公眾人物,以及大眾媒體中的網路。受訪者在資訊尋求的過程中,其尋求偏好特別與心理因素有關(尤其是需要感到安全與同志友善),此外與人相關的資訊或資訊來源對他們而言亦有極大的影響力;反之,他們遇到的阻力與困難也較多與這兩類因素有關,例如在尋求資訊時他們需要考量到出櫃的風險而減少資訊尋求。 資訊對女同志的意義包含五種,分別為增加知識、穩定心情、增長能力與理解、作為工具或幫助決策,以及自我同志認同與整合。另外,研究結果也發現受訪者們在自我認同有相當程度之後,往往也會進行資訊分享,讓其他更多人知道同志相關資訊。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, LGBTQ rights movement in Taiwan has made significant improvement. However, even though same-sex marriage has been legalized in Taiwan today, LGBTQs still suffer from social stigma and discrimination. Particularly, lesbians are under the pressure of being the “second sex” and “sexual minority” in a patriarchal society. This study explored how Taiwanese lesbians construct their lesbian identity and undergo coming-out process. With reference to the literatures about information behavior, identity development and the models of coming-out process, this research aims at exploring Taiwanese lesbians’ information need in contexts, information seeking and information use during their coming-out process.
A total of 15 Taiwanese lesbians were interviewed. Grounded theory was employed to analyze the interviews. Based on the interviews, the coming-out process of the interviewees involves three tasks, including self-identification process, the process of coming-out to others, and the process of identifying with lesbian community. Their information needs also correspond to these three tasks, focusing on needs related to oneself, needs in relationship with others, and needs relevant to LGBTQ communities. At the beginning of identity development, interviewees’ needs concentrated on themselves, and subsequently, their information needs would expand to in relation with others and LGBTQ groups. Interviewees’ information channels and sources could be divided into four types, including their intimate personal network, wider others (LGBTQ acquaintances, netizens and public figures), mass media, and institutions and fields. Amongst all the channels and sources, close LGBTQ friends, LGBTQ netizens or public figures, and the Internet were the most commonly used sources. In addition, interviewees prefer information and information sources concerning psychological aspects (especially security and LGBTQ friendliness) and interpersonal factors during their information seeking. Meanwhile, interviewees’ consideration on psychological and interpersonal factors might on the other hand, reduce their information seeking, because they have to take the risk of coming-out reluctantly. Information could provide lesbians knowledge, stabilize their mood, enhance their capability, act as tools or help them make decisions, as well as assist them in building up self-identity. Besides, the study also found that when interviewees have reached certain extents of self-identification as LGBTQ, they would have been engaging in information sharing on LGBTQ issues, so as to make more people aware of the sexual minorities. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:11:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R02126015-1.pdf: 3589814 bytes, checksum: cb7e178aabaecc2e5c98185c1940272f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 圖 次 xi
表 次 xiii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究問題 3 第三節 研究貢獻 4 第四節 研究範圍與限制 6 第五節 名詞解釋 8 第二章、文獻回顧 11 第一節 同志身分與同志處境 11 第二節 同志的自我認同(對自己出櫃) 18 第三節 對他人出櫃 32 第四節 同志資訊行為 40 第五節 小結 72 第三章、研究方法 75 第一節 研究方法與研究設計 75 第二節 研究對象與研究時程 76 第三節 資料蒐集與分析 81 第四章、研究結果 87 第一節 同志自我認同與出櫃過程 87 第二節 同志資訊需求與問題情境 123 第三節 同志資訊尋求行為 139 第四節 同志資訊使用與資訊對女同志之意義 193 第五章、結論與建議 203 第一節 結論 203 第二節 討論 207 第三節 建議 211 參考文獻 215 附錄 235 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 臺灣女同志自我認同與出櫃歷程之資訊行為 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Information Behavior of Taiwanese Lesbians during the Identity Development and the Coming-out Process | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡天怡(Tien-I Tsai),葉乃靜(Nei-Ching Yeh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 臺灣,女同志,自我認同歷程,出櫃過程,資訊行為, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Taiwan,lesbian,LGBTQ,identity development,coming-out process,information behavior, | en |
dc.relation.page | 237 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201903815 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.51 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。