請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73700完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張俊彥 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ya-Ju Hsu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 許雅汝 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:08:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王蕙雙(2015)。基地綠化之景觀生態效益。未出版之碩士論文，臺灣大學園藝暨景觀研究所。
江彥政、張俊彥(2004)。景觀生態中塊區結構指數與鳥類物種歧異度相關性之研究。興大園藝，29(4)，94-110。 金恆鑣等(編譯)(2002)。生態學概念與應用(Manuel C. Molles, Jr.)。臺北市：美商麥格羅．希爾。 李培芬(2005)。鳥類監測模式之建立。國家公園生物多樣性與環境監測研習班。臺灣大學生物多樣性研究中心，臺北。 林振鵬(2006)。都市綠地系統景觀結構與鳥類群聚之相關性－以臺北市公園綠地為例。未出版之碩士論文，臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所 林璇姿(2006)。都市公園綠地連接度之探討-以臺北市大安區為例。未出版之碩士論文，東海大學景觀學系研究所。 黃偉銘、歐聖榮、張俊彥(2005)。以鳥類為指標物種評估臺灣鄉村地區景觀生態研究尺度。造園學報，12(4)，1-21。 陳明群(2007)。都市綠地棲地的結構與鳥類多樣性關係之研究。未出版之碩士論文，中國文化大學景觀學研究所。 張宜婷(2008)。由跨尺度景觀結構探討鳥類和蝴蝶多樣性。未出版之碩士論文，臺灣大學園藝暨景觀研究所。 張高雯、張俊彥(2000)。景觀生態結構與鳥類多樣性之相關研究。興大園藝，25(3)：95-107。 黃麗娟、莊智瑋、何世華、林昭遠(2008)。衛星影像植生指標優選之研究，水土保持學報，40 (1)，39-50。 國立臺灣大學生物多樣性研究中心(2009)。鳥類監測標準作業手冊。臺北市：編者。 鄭亞嵐、林晏州(2003)。都市公園綠地連接度與鳥類群聚關係之研究，中國園藝，49(4) : 395-406。 鄔建國，(2000)，景觀生態學-概念與理論，生態學雜誌，19(1)，42-52。 鄔建國，(2003)，景觀生態學:格局、過程、尺度與等級，臺北市:五南。 張俊彥、林裕彬、張琪如、吳振發(譯)(2011)。景觀量測(Andre Botequilha Leitao., & Joseph Miller., & Jack Ahern., & Kevin McGarigal)，臺北市:五南。(原著出版年：2006) Atsushi Shimazaki., Yuichi Yamaura., Masayuki Senzaki., Yuki Yabuhara., Takumi Akasaka ., & Futoshi Nakamura.(2016). Urban permeability for birds: An approach combining mobbing-call experiments and circuit theory. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.19,167-175. Brad H. McRae., Dickson, B.G., Keitt, T.H., & Shah, V.B. (2008). Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89,2712–2724. Craig E. Simpkins., & Todd E. Dennis., & Thomas R. Etherington., & George L.W. Perry.(2018). Assessing the performance of common landscape connectivity metrics using a virtual ecologist approach. Ecological Modelling , 367, 13-23. Darren R. Grafius ., Ron Corstanje ., Gavin M. Siriwardena ., Kate E. Plummer .,& Jim A. Harris.(2017). A bird’s eye view: using circuit theory to study urban landscape connectivity for birds. Landscape Ecology. 32, 1771–1787. Dean Urban & Timothy Keitt. (2001). Landscape connectivity : a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology. 82(5), 1205-1218. Douglas H. Johnson. (1980). The Comparison of Usage and Availability Measurements for Evaluating Resource Preference. Ecology. 61(1), 65-71. Ebru Ersoy., Anna Jorgensen., & Philip H. Warren. (2019). Identifying multispecies connectivity corridors and the spatial pattern of the landscape. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40, 308-322. Evelyn Uuemaa., & Ülo Mander., & Riho Marja. (2013). Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. Ecological Indicators,28 , 100-106. F.Adriaensen., J.P.Chardon., G.De Blust., E.Swinnen., S.Villalba., H.Gulinck., & E.Matthysen. (2003). The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4),233-247. G.D. Daniels., & J.B. Kirkpatrick. (2006). Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia. Biological conservation, 133, 326-335. Gloria Rodríguez-Loinaz., Josu G. Alday., & Miren Onaindia. (2015). Multiple ecosystem services landscape index: A tool for multifunctional landscapes conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 147, 152-163. Graves, T., Chandler, R.B., Royle, J.A., Beier, P., & Kendall, K.C.(2014). Estimating landscape resistance to dispersal. Landscape Ecology. 29, 1201–1211. Gregory S. Keller., & Richard H. Yahner.(2007). Seasonal forest-patch use by birds in fragmented landscapes of south-central Pennsylvania. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology.119(3), 410-418. Harbin Li .,& Jianguo Wu.(2004). Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecology.19, 389-399. Harini Nagendra . (2002). Opposite trends in response for the Shannon and Simpson indices of landscape diversity. Applied Geography, 12, 175-186. Lorena P. Herrera., Malena C. Sabatino., Florencia R. Jaimes., & Santiago Saura .(2017). Landscape connectivity and the role of small habitat patches as stepping stones: an assessment of the grassland biome in South America. Biodiversity and Conservation. 26(14), 3465–3479. Hodgson, P., French, K., &Major, R.E. (2007). Avian movement across abrupt ecological edges: differential responses to housing density in an urban matrix. Landscape and Urban Planning.79, 266–272. Hostetler, M.(1999).Scale, birds, and human decisions：a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 45(1), 15-19. Ingo Kowarik. (2011). Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental Pollution, 159(8-9), 1974-1983. Inga Schmiedel., & Heike Culmsee.(2016). The influence of landscape fragmentation, expressed by the ‘Effective Mesh Size Index’, on regional patterns of vascular plant species richness in Lower Saxony, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 209-220. Jan .P. Knaapen., & Marten Scheffer ., & Bert Harms. (1992). Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 23(1), 1-16. Jan Thiele., & Sascha Buchholz., & Jens Schirmel. (2017). Using resistance distance from circuit theory to model dispersal through habitat corridors. Journal of Plant Ecology, 11(3), 385-393. Jean-Pierre L. Savard., Philippe Clergeau., & Gwenaelle Mennechez.(2000). Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(3-4), 131-142. Justin M. Calabrese., & William F. Fagan.(2004). A comparison‐shopper's guide to connectivity metrics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(10), 529-536. Jianguo Wu. (2014). Urban ecology and sustainability: The state-of-the-science and future directions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 209-221. John B. Dunning., Brent J. Danielson., & H. Ronald Pulliam. (1992). Ecological Processes That Affect Populations in Complex Landscapes. Oikos. 65(1), 169-175. Katherine A. Zeller ., Kevin McGarigal., & Andrew R. Whiteley. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecology.27(6), 777-797. Luck, M., & Wu, J. G. (2002). A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: A case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology,17, 327–339. Lorena P. Herrera., Malena C. Sabatino ., Florencia R. Jaimes., & Santiago Saura.(2017). Landscape connectivity and the role of small habitat patches as stepping stones: an assessment of the grassland biome in South America. Biodiversity and Conservation. 26(14), 3465–3479. Mark Hostetler ., & C.S. Holling. (2000). Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosystems. 4(1), 22-54. M. H. Egerer.,& P. Bichier., & S. M. Philpott. (2017). Landscape and Local Habitat Correlates of Lady Beetle Abundance and Species Richness in Urban Agriculture. Annals of the Entomological Society of America,110(1), 97-103. Natasha B. Kotliar., & John A. Wiens. (1990). Multiple Scales of Patchiness and Patch Structure: A Hierarchical Framework for the Study of Heterogeneity. Oikos. 59(2), 253-260. Paul Opdam., & Jana Verboom., & Rogier Pouwels. (2003). Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecology, 18, 113–126. Piha, M., Tiainen, J., Holopainen, J. & Vepsalainen, V., (2007). Effects of land-use and landscape characteristics on avian diversity and abundance in a boreal agricultural landscape with organic and conventional farms. Biological Conservation, 140, 50–61. Philip D. Taylor., Lenore Fahrig., Kringen Henein., & Gray Merriam.(1993). Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos, 68(3), 571-573. Richard T. T. Forman and M. Godron. (1986). Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 620 pp. Richard T. T. Forman., (1995). Land Mosaics. The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Richard T. T. Forman. (1995). Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology.10(3), 133-142. Richard T. T. Forman. (2016). Urban ecology principles: are urban ecology and natural area ecology really different. Landscape Ecology,31(8), 1653–1662. Robby R. Marrotte., & Jeff Bowman. (2017). The relationship between least-cost and resistance distance. PLoS One. 12(3), 1-19. Sallie Bailey. (2007). Increasing connectivity in fragmented landscapes: An investigation of evidence for biodiversity gain in woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management, 238, 7-23 Savard, J.P.L., & P. Clergeau., & G. Mennechez. (2000). Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48,131-142. S. Braaker ., & M. Moretti., & R. Boesch ., & J. Ghazoul ., & M. K. Obrist ., & F. Bontadina. (2014). Assessing habitat connectivity for ground‐dwelling animals in an urban environment. Ecological Applications,24(7), 1583-1595. Spellerberg, I.F.(1991).Monitoring Ecological Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Stephen C. F. Palmer., & Aure´ lie Coulon., & Justin M. J. Travis.(2011). Introducing a ‘stochastic movement simulator’ for estimating habitat connectivity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 258-268. Thomas J.Jones., & KevinWatts., & Robin C.Whytock. (2018). Using fluid dynamic concepts to estimate species movement rates in terrestrial landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 93,344-350. Thomas W. Schoener. (1968). Sizes of Feeding Territories among Birds. Ecology. 49(1), 123-141. Tsuyoshi Morimoto., & KazuhiroKatoh., & YuichiYamaura., & SatomiWatanabe.(2006). Can surrounding land cover influence the avifauna in urban/suburban woodlands in Japan? Landscape and Urban Planning.75(1-2), 143-154. Villalba S., Gulinck H., Verbeylen G., & Matthysen E. (1998). Relationschip between patch connectivity and the occurence of the European red squirrel, Sciurus vulgaris, in forest fragments within heterogeneuos landscapes. Key Concepts in Landscape Ecology. 205-220. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73700 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 景觀連接度(connectivity)被定義為景觀促進或阻礙生物體在資源塊區之間運動的程度，可分為結構與功能。在城市化的過程中，時常間接導致生物棲地破碎化，景觀連接度的降低，也會影響物種在空間中的移動與分布。然而，我們對於景觀連接度的影響與認知上仍存在差異，通常僅作資源分配而甚少考慮生物移動模式，倘若忽略了生物移動將導致保護上潛在破壞的結果，故了解連接度將有助於在景觀尺度上，為生態問題提供規範性的解決方案。
本研究旨在探討都市景觀連接度與鳥類群聚之關係，選擇電路理論模型作為景觀連接度量化指標，檢驗景觀連接度是否與鳥類群聚有關，並比較不同連接度量化指標對鳥類群聚的影響程度。以台北市作為研究樣區，使用BBS Taiwan臺灣繁殖鳥類大調查的鳥調數據，推導出各景觀類別的電阻值，以此表示為物種在景觀中移動的難易程度，並運用ArcGIS 10.4數化景觀結構，將電阻值紀錄於網格資料(raster)中，後續以電路理論為基礎的Circuitscape 4.0軟體進行連接度分析，最後檢定景觀連接度與鳥類多樣性的相關性。 研究結果顯示林地鳥類是會受到鄰近塊區特徵的影響，且較不受距離上的限制，當資源區塊間隔離程度(移動成本)越小時，越有利於鳥類移動與分布，鳥類多樣性會隨之增加。藉由研究結果指出，電路理論模型相較於其他量化指標，對鳥類群聚影響程度較大，適用於分析臺灣環境特性與生物習性。在實務上的應用，能夠透過電路理論模型比較不同方案對連接度提升的成效，有助於確定對物種有利的空間配置和保護生物多樣性的恢復或緩解之措施。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Landscape connectivity is the degree to which the landscape facilitates or impedes movement among resource patches. This can be further refined into structural and functional definitions (Taylor et al., 1993.). In the process of urbanization, the biological habitat is fragmented indirectly. Reducing connectivity will decrease the rate at which species can move between source patch. However, we still have different cognitions of landscape connectivity. Maps produced by planners are usually of resource distribution, not movement patterns. Ignoring biological movement can lead to potentially devastating consequences for conservation.
Our research focused on the relationship between landscape connectivity and species diversity of birds. We also tried to review and choose the appropriate method modelling landscape connectivity. This study use circuit theory to model landscape connectivity and collect the on-site investigation data of BBS Taiwan. We compare the data to depict the relationship between landscape connectivity and woodland birds species. We found woodland birds species' richness may be more strongly affected by characteristics and function of landscape patches than distance between the landscape patches. Recognizing landscape functional connectivity assists our in offering prescriptive solutions to ecological problems at the landscape scale. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:08:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05628304-1.pdf: 27444225 bytes, checksum: b9d39d7ed371db5a82b3fb30840a7d89 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I
中文摘要 II Abstract III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究重要性 3 第四節 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻評述 5 第一節 景觀生態學理論 5 第二節 電路理論概念與應用 15 第三節 鳥類族群相關理論 23 第三章 研究方法 29 第一節 研究變項 29 第二節 研究架構與假設 31 第三節 研究地點與鳥類資料蒐集 32 第四節 研究操作方法 38 第五節 資料分析方法 50 第四章 研究結果 51 第一節 樣本特性分析 51 第二節 研究假設驗證 54 第五章 結論與建議 61 第一節 研究結果討論 61 第二節 後續成果應用與研究建議 63 參考文獻 66 附錄 73 附錄一 引用文獻原文摘錄 73 附錄二 研究樣區景觀結構數化結果 77 附錄三 研究樣區功能連接度數化結果 81 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 鳥類多樣性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 電路理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網絡分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 景觀指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 結構與功能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Landscape connectivity | en |
| dc.subject | the birds | en |
| dc.subject | circuit theory | en |
| dc.subject | urban | en |
| dc.title | 以電路理論探討都市景觀連接度與鳥類群聚之相關研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Using Circuit Theory to Model Connectivity for Birds in Urban Landscape | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林寶秀 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州,歐聖榮,鄭佳昆 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 結構與功能,景觀指數,網絡分析,電路理論,鳥類多樣性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Landscape connectivity,the birds,circuit theory,urban, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 85 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902483 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 26.8 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。