請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7353完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉素玲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yun-Chen Tu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 杜昀宸 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-19T17:41:58Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-07-01 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-19T17:41:58Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-06-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 387.
Banatvala, N., Mayo, K., Megraud, F., Jennings, R., Deeks, J., & Feldman, R. (1993). The cohort effect and Helicobacter pylori. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 168(1), 219-221. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff? In: 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2007, Jeju, Korea, pp 368-373. Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T. L., and Rogers, W. A. (2011). Understanding Robot Acceptance (Technical Report no HFA-TR-1103). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology. Brown, T. J., Mowen, J. C., Donavan, D. T., & Licata, J. W. (2002). The customer orientation of service workers: Personality trait effects on self-and supervisor performance ratings. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 110-119. Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5), 151-156. Cheng, Y.-H., Shyi, G. C.-W., & Cheng, K.-H. (2016). Age differences in face memory and face processing between younger and older adults in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 58(4), 233-262. Chu, L., Chen, H.-W., Cheng, P.-Y., Ho, P., Weng, I.-T., Yang, P.-L., . . . Wang, T.-M. (2019). Identifying features that enhance older adults’ acceptance of robots: A mixed methods study. Gerontology, 1-10. Curtis, V., Aunger, R., & Rabie, T. (2004). Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271 [suppl_4], S131-S133. Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2009). More than a servant: Self-reported willingness of younger and older adults to having a robot perform interactive and critical tasks in the home. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 53(2), 136-140. Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., Newman, A. B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., . . . Burke, G. (2001). Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56(3), M146-M157. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative' description of personality': The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361-375. Ho, C.-C., & MacDorman, K. F. (2017). Measuring the uncanny valley effect. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(1), 129-139. Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Jin, S.-A., & Yan, C. (2006). Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human–robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56, 754-772. Lewkowicz, D. J., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2012). The development of the uncanny valley in infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 54(2), 124-132. MacDorman, K. F., & Entezari, S. O. (2015). Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interaction Studies, 16(2), 141-172. MacDorman, K. F., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 297-337. Macunovich, D. J., Easterlin, R. A., Schaeffer, C. M., & Crimmins, E. M. (1995). Echoes of the baby boom and bust: Recent and prospective changes in living alone among elderly widows in the United States. Demography, 32(1), 17-28. Mathur, M. B., & Reichling, D. B. (2016). Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley. Cognition, 146, 22-32. McCroskey, J. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65-72. Mitchell, W. J., Szerszen Sr, K. A., Lu, A. S., Schermerhorn, P. W., Scheutz, M., & MacDorman, K. F. (2011). A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley. i-Perception, 2(1), 10-12. Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33-35. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human performance, 11(2-3), 145-165. World Health Organization, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2012). Global Health and Aging Report. Retrieved from: http://www.nia.nih.gov. Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2008). Prediction of human behavior in human-robot interaction using psychological scales for anxiety and negative attitudes toward robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(2), 442-451. Park, S.-H., Mahony, D. F., Kim, Y., & Do Kim, Y. (2015). Curiosity generating advertisements and their impact on sport consumer behavior. Sport Management Review, 18, 359-369. Powers A, Kramer ADI, Lim S, Kuo J, Lee S, Kiesler S (2005, August). Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international workshop on robots and human interactive communication, Nashville, TN. Reher, D., & Requena, M. (2018). Living alone in later life: A global perspective. Population and Development Review, 44, 427-454. Republic of China, Ministry of the Interior (2019). Number of Population by Age of 0-14, 15-64, 65 + , dependency ratio, Index of aging and dependency ratio. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of the Interior. Roy, N., Baltus, G., Fox, D., Gemperle, F., Goetz, J., Hirsch, T., …Thrun, S. (2000, January). Towards personal service robots for the elderly. Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Robotics and Entertainment (WIRE), Pittsburgh, PA. Samochowiec, J., & Florack, A. (2010). Intercultural contact under uncertainty: The impact of predictability and anxiety on the willingness to interact with a member from an unknown cultural group. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(5), 507-515. Saygin, A. P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J., & Frith, C. (2011). The thing that should not be: Predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(4), 413-422. Seyama, J. i., & Nagayama, R. S. (2007). The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 16, 337-351. Smarr, C. A., Fausset, C. B., & Rogers, W. A. (2011). Understanding the potential for robot assistance for older adults in the home environment (Technical Report no HFA-TR-1102). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology. Smarr, C.-A., Mitzner, T. L., Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014). Domestic robots for older adults: Attitudes, preferences, and potential. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(2), 229-247. Smarr, C. A., Prakash, A., Beer, J. M., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2012, October). Older adults’ preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Boston, MA. Tay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014). When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human–robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 75-84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.014 Tomassini, C., Glaser, K., Wolf, D. A., Broese van Groenou, M. I. & Grundy, E. (2004). Living Arrangements among Older People: An Overview of Trends in Europe and the USA, Population Trends, 115, 24-34. Tung, F. W. (2011, July). Influence of gender and age on the attitudes of children towards humanoid robots. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction., Heidelberg, Germany. Tung, F. W. (2016). Child perception of humanoid robot appearance and behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(6), 493-502. Vail, K. E., Rothschild, Z. K., Weise, D. R., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2010). A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 84-94. Vess, M., Arndt, J., & Cox, C. R. (2012). Faith and nature: The effect of death-relevant cognitions on the relationship between religious fundamentalism and connectedness to nature. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 333-340. Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2007). Living with seal robots—its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23, 972-980. Yeh, S.-C., & Lo, S. K. (2004). Living alone, social support, and feeling lonely among the elderly. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32(2), 129-138. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7353 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著人口出生率下降和老齡化加劇，解決照護長者勞動力短缺的問題日趨嚴峻。值此智慧製造的工業4.0時代，機器人可以成為有效協助長者日常生活的替代方案。然而，先前研究顯示長者對機器人的接受程度較年輕人低，推測其中一個原因是機器人的外觀所致。恐怖谷理論指的是當機器人變得更像人類時，人們會有更正向的評價，但這個趨勢只能達到某個程度；當機器人和人類外觀達到高度相像時，人們的喜好程度會急遽下降，形成一個恐怖谷的曲線。基於過去支持恐怖谷的結果主要來自年輕人，未必能適用於各年齡層，本研究檢驗恐怖谷是否也適用於老年人和中年人。我們也檢驗人們對不同功能的機器人（陪伴型或服務型）的接受度是否會根據機器人的外觀而改變，以及機器人的個性是否與其功能的接受度有關。我們讓年輕人（N = 80，年齡18-39歲）、中年人（N = 87，年齡40-59歲）、和長者（N = 88，年齡60-87歲）一次看一組從總數84張機器人的照片中選出的單一張機器人臉，並對機器人照片進行印象的評估以及關於機器人的使用意圖。結果顯示年輕人和中年人出現恐怖谷，然而老年人沒有表現出此效果—無論機器人提供哪種功能，他們都偏好由外型像人的機器人提供。除權威性外，依機器人外觀所評估的個性分數與功能接受度均呈現正相關。這些發現意味著機器人的設計應該依據不同年齡的使用者及其提供的服務類型改變外觀設計。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Due to declined birthrate and the increasing aging population, shortage of caregiving labor force has become a critical issue worldwide. Introducing robotic products could provide an effective way to help older adults’ daily lives. However, previous studies indicated that older adults’ acceptance of robots was lower than younger adults. One possible reason of this lower acceptance of robots might be robot appearance. The Uncanny Valley Phenomenon (UVP) refers to the phenomenon that people rate more positively as robots become more humanlike, but only up to a certain point; as it approaches near-perfect similarity of human appearance, likeability drops and forms an uncanny valley. Nonetheless, evidence for the UVP were mainly from younger adults. We therefore examined whether the UVP is also applicable for older and middle-aged adults in the present study. We also examined whether the acceptance of functions (companion vs. service) would change based on robot appearance, and whether perceived personalities have any relation with the acceptance of robot function. We asked younger (N= 80, age 18-39), middle-aged (N= 87, age 40-59), and older (N= 88, age 60-87) adults to view each picture of a set of robot pictures selected from a totally 84 robots and evaluate their impression on each robot and the intention of use regarding robot functions. UVP was found in younger and middle-aged adults; however, older adults did not show UVP. They preferred humanlike over non-humanlike robots, regardless of robot function. Scores on each personality－except for authoritativeness－showed positive correlations with the acceptance of functions. These findings suggest that the design of assistive robots should take UVP into consideration by customizing robot appearance in accordance with the function provided to different age groups. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:41:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05227117-1.pdf: 4362909 bytes, checksum: 439f0579142fd75cf2bee46de20d283c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction 1
General Method 10 Participants 10 Questionnaire 10 Stimuli 15 Procedure 16 Data analysis 17 Results 19 The uncanny valley across different age groups 19 Acceptance of functions and appearance 23 Acceptance of functions, robot appearance, and perceived personalities 31 General Discussion 57 The uncanny valley phenomenon across different age groups 57 Acceptance of functions and appearance 61 Acceptance of functions, robot appearance,and personalities 62 Limitations and future direction 66 References 70 Appendices 78 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 恐怖谷理論再探：機器人外觀如何影響不同年齡層使用者的喜好、個性判斷、及服務或陪伴功能的接受度 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Uncanny Valley Revisited: Age-Related Differences and the Effect of Function Type | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 賴岳益,岳修平,羅仕宇 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 恐怖谷理論,長者,接受度,服務型,陪伴型,機器人,外表,個性,使用者,年齡, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | uncanny valley,age,older adults,acceptance,appearance,personality,robot,companionship,service function, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 79 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900877 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-06-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf | 4.26 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。