交通違規檢舉系統審核警察裁量行為之研究

Abstract

在有關基層員警對交通違規案件的執法行為探討上，過去文獻多集中在「當場舉發」的行為情狀研究上，尚無對因「民眾檢舉」而起之檢舉舉發進行探究；面對越來越普遍的網路線上交通違規檢舉，本研究對系統審核案件的裁量權運用狀況進行探究。透過深度訪談兩個新北市警察分局在此項勤務上的監督上級與審核基層，本研究發現，高額罰鍰、法院撤銷判決、事證資料的限制、檢舉人自我揭露不完全等因素讓系統審核警察的裁量行為傾向保守；此外，若干與違規情狀無關的因素讓系統審核警察之間存在著裁量差異。最後本研究根據訪談結果提出可以降低審核警察勤務負擔、提升用法一致性的政策建議，以及未來研究應持續關注的研究方向。

In the discussion on the law enforcement behaviors of the front-line police officers in dealing with traffic violations, the past works of literature have mostly focused on the behavioral analysis of ' on spot sanction ', no research in Taiwan is about the traffic enforcement caused by the 'people's report'. With more and more online traffic violation reports, this study explores the use of discretion of police officers in system audit cases. By in-depth interviews aimed at the supervisors and police officers who undertake in two administrative districts of New Taipei City, this study discovers that the huge amount of fines, the court's withdrawal of administrative penalty, the limitations of the evidence, and the incomplete disclosure of the informants made the discretionary behavior of the police tends to be conservative; in addition, police officers have discretionary differences due to a number of factors that are unrelated to the violation. Based on the interview results, this study proposes policy recommendations that can reduce the burden of police duties, improve law enforcement consistency, as well as directions for future research that should be continuously focused on.