Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73038Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鍾孝文(Hsiao-Wen Chung) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Ping Chien | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 錢政平 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:14:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-01-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-01-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-01-06 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Becker CD, Grossholz M, Mentha G, de Peyer R, Terrier F. MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, potential indications, and diagnostic features of benign, postoperative, and malignant conditions. Eur Radiol 1997;7:865-74. 2. Takehara Y. Can MRCP replace ERCP? J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:517-34. 3. Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, Nelson RC. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiographics 2000;20:939-57. 4. Sodickson A, Mortele KJ, Barish MA, Zou KH, Thibodeau S, Tempany CM. Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 2006;238:549-59. 5. Glockner JF, Saranathan M, Bayram E, Lee CU. Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) using a 3D Dixon fat-water separated balanced steady state free precession sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 2013;31:1263-70. 6. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998;207:21-32. 7. Yamashita Y, Abe Y, Tang Y, Urata J, Sumi S, Takahashi M. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1449-54. 8. Textor HJ, Flacke S, Pauleit D, Keller E, Neubrand M, Terjung B, Gieseke J, Scheurlen C, Sauerbruch T, Schild HH. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with respiratory triggering in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy 2002;34:984-90. 9. Morita S, Ueno E, Suzuki K, Machida H, Fujimura M, Kojima S, Hirata M, Ohnishi T, Imura C. Navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction (PACE) technique vs. conventional respiratory-triggered technique for free-breathing 3D MRCP: an initial prospective comparative study using healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:673-7. 10. Hand JW, Lagendijk JJ, Hajnal JV, Lau RW, Young IR. SAR and temperature changes in the leg due to an RF decoupling coil at frequencies between 64 and 213 MHz. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:68-74. 11. Chu ML, Chien CP, Wu WC, Chung HW. Gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) MR imaging: a long-existing technology that may find wide applications in modern era. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019;9:1477-84. 12. Oshio K, Feinberg DA. GRASE (Gradient- and spin-echo) imaging: a novel fast MRI technique. Magn Reson Med 1991;20:344-9. 13. Feinberg DA, Oshio K. GRASE (gradient- and spin-echo) MR imaging: a new fast clinical imaging technique. Radiology 1991;181:597-602. 14. Yoshida M, Nakaura T, Inoue T, Tanoue S, Takada S, Utsunomiya D, Tsumagari S, Harada K, Yamashita Y. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE? Eur Radiol 2018;28:2436-43. 15. Nam JG, Lee JM, Kang HJ, Lee SM, Kim E, Peeters JM, Yoon JH. GRASE revisited: breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a Gradient and Spin Echo (GRASE) technique at 3T. Eur Radiol 2018;28:3721-8. 16. Mugler JP 3rd, Brookeman JR. Off-resonance image artifacts in interleaved-EPI and GRASE pulse sequences. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:306-13. 17. Johnson G, Feinberg DA, Venkataraman V. A comparison of phase encoding ordering schemes in T2-weighted GRASE imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:427-35. 18. Jenkins JT, Glass G, Ballantyne S, Fullarton GM. Effect of MRCP introduction on ERCP practice: are there implications for service and training? Gut 2006;55:1365-6. 19. Irie H, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, Yoshimitsu K, Aibe H, Shinozaki K, Masuda K. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretation. Radiographics 2001;21:23-37. 20. Riordan RD, Khonsari M, Jeffries J, Maskell GF, Cook PG. Pineapple juice as a negative oral contrast agent in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a preliminary evaluation. Br J Radiol 2004;77:991-9. 21. Espinosa MG, Sosa M, De León-Rodríguez LM, Córdova T, Bernal-Alvarado J, Avila-Rodríguez M, Reyes-Aguilera JA, Ortíz JJ, Barrios FA. Blackberry (Rubus spp.): a pH-dependent oral contrast medium for gastrointestinal tract images by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:195-200. 22. Chavhan GB, Almehdar A, Moineddin R, Gupta S, Babyn PS. Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3-D fast spin-echo and single-shot fast spin-echo radial slab MR cholangiopancreatography images in children. Pediatr Radiol 2013;43:1086-92. 23. Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, Nozaki A, Sugimura M, Ikeda M, Sakahara H. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of respiratory-triggered three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo with parallel imaging technique and breath-hold half-Fourier two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiat Med 2006;24:202-9. 24. Zhang J, Israel GM, Hecht EM, Krinsky GA, Babb JS, Lee VS. Isotropic 3D T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography with parallel imaging: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1564-70. 25. Lohöfer FK, Kaissis GA, Rasper M, Katemann C, Hock A, Peeters JM, Schlag C, Rummeny EJ, Karampinos D, Braren RF. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 Tesla: Image quality comparison between 3D compressed sensing and 2D single-shot acquisitions. Eur J Radiol 2019;115:53-8. 26. Zhu L, Xue H, Sun Z, Qian T, Weiland E, Kuehn B, Asbach P, Hamm B, Jin Z. Modified breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with a small field-of-view and high resolution acquisition: clinical feasibility in biliary and pancreatic disorders. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018;48:1389-99. 27. Nandalur KR, Hussain HK, Weadock WJ, Wamsteker EJ, Johnson TD, Khan AS, D'Amico AR, Ford MK, Nandalur SR, Chenevert TL. Possible biliary disease: diagnostic performance of high-spatial-resolution isotropic 3D T2-weighted MRCP. Radiology 2008;249:883-90. 28. Chung HW, Chen CY, Zimmerman RA, Lee KW, Lee CC, Chin SC. T2-Weighted fast MR imaging with true FISP versus HASTE: comparative efficacy in the evaluation of normal fetal brain maturation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1375-80. 29. Reinhold C, Guibaud, L, Genin G, Bret PM (1995) MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between two-dimensional fast spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 4: 379–384. 30. Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:823-33. 31. Keller PJ, Karis JP, Fram EK, Heiserman JE, Drayer BP. An alternative to GRASE: toward spin-echo-like contrast with independent reconstruction of gradient-echo images. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:804-8. 32. Fellner F, Schmitt R, Trenkler J, Fellner C, Böhm-Jurkovic H. Turbo gradient-spin-echo (GRASE): first clinical experiences with a fast T2-weighted sequence in MRI of the brain. Eur J Radiol 1995;19:171-6. 33. Umek W, Ba-Ssalamah A, Prokesch R, Mallek R, Heimberger K, Hittmair K. Imaging of the brain using the fast-spin-echo and gradient-spin-echo techniques. Eur Radiol 1998;8:409-15. 34. Patel MR, Klufas RA, Shapiro AW. MR imaging of diseases of the brain: comparison of GRASE and conventional spin-echo T2-weighted pulse sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:963-6. 35. Fellner F, Held P, Fellner C, Schmitt R, Obletter N. Fast spin-echo (FSE) and gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) in fast MRI of the pelvis. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:517-24. 36. Postema S, Pattynama PM, van Rijswijk CS, van Erkel A, Tjin A Ton ER. MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison between fast spin-echo MRI and GRASE. Eur Radiol 1998;8:45-9. 37. Welch KM, Windham J, Knight RA, Nagesh V, Hugg JW, Jacobs M, Peck D, Booker P, Dereski MO, Levine SR. A model to predict the histopathology of human stroke using diffusion and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 1995;26:1983-9. 38. Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Burk DL Jr, Levy D, Rifkin MD. Variable-flip-angle spin-echo MR imaging of the pelvis: more versatile T2-weighted images. Radiology 1989;171:525-9. 39. Röschmann P. Radiofrequency penetration and absorption in the human body: limitations to high-field whole body nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 1987;14:922-31. 40. Nitz WR. Fast and ultrafast non-echo-planar MR imaging techniques. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2866-82. 41. Jovicich J, Norris DG. GRASE imaging at 3 Tesla with template interactive phase-encoding. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:970-9. 42. Mugler JP 3rd. Improved three-dimensional GRASE imaging with the SORT phase-encoding strategy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:604-12. 43. Kim H, Kim DH, Park J. Variable-flip-angle single slab 3D GRASE imaging with phase-independent image reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:1041-52. 44. Itatani R, Namimoto T, Kajihara H, Yoshimura A, Katahira K, Nasu J, Matsushita I, Sakamoto F, Kidoh M, Yamashita Y. Preoperative evaluation of the cystic duct for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of navigator-gated prospective acquisition correction- and conventional respiratory-triggered techniques at free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography. Eur Radiol 2013;23:1911-8. 45. Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Novellas S, Gelsi E, Vanbiervliet G, Tran A, Schnyder P, Bruneton JN. Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 2007;17:241-50. 46. Lee JH, Lee SS, Kim JY, Kim IS, Byun JH, Park SH, Lee MG. Parallel imaging improves the image quality and duct visibility of breathhold two-dimensional thick-slab MR cholangiopancreatography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:269-75. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73038 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 我們利用3T磁振造影儀，比較兩種不同序列所呈現出的膽道胰管影像(MRCP)，在不同位置其清晰程度差異性比較分析。所採用的兩種序列分別為gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) 3D影像，以及thick-slab fast spin-echo (FSE) 2D影像。全部受檢測者總共為95人(男/女 = 49:46，年齡介於 25-75歲)，3T磁振造影參數調校以一次呼吸閉氣的時間內能夠完成影像，且不超過組織安全可曝露能量(SAR)的上限值為原則。膽道及胰管依解剖構造分為八個區段來比較影像呈現，依是否符合臨床診斷所能接受之影像品質，採用4個等第分類。 在總膽管、總肝管區段，3D GRASE MRCP 的表現比2D FSE MRCP 來得好 (兩者p < 0.001)，在右前肝內膽管(p < 0.001)、右後肝內膽管(p < 0.005) 、胰管遠段 (p < 0.05)區域，則為2D FSE MRCP比3D GRASE MRCP 的表現好。另外可以發現同時合併這兩個序列的影像一起判讀，左肝內膽管無法診斷的情形可以減少至10個受測者(5.3%)，而原本3D GRASE MRCP有31個(16.3%)受測者左肝內膽管無法診斷，2D FSE MRCP有21個(11.1%)受測者左肝內膽管無法診斷。 儘管在單一次呼吸閉氣的MRCP檢查中，3D GRASE MRCP 對於總膽管及總肝管的診斷較為有利，但2D FSE MRCP在較小管徑的位置仍舊有較好的表現，兩者為互補性的關係。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | We compare the depiction conspicuity of three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) based on gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) and two-dimensional (2D) thick-slab MRCP using fast spin-echo (FSE) in different segments of hepatic and pancreatic ducts at 3T. There were 95 subjects (M/F = 49:46, age range = 25-75) performed for at 3T. The parameters are adjusted under the constraints of specific absorption rate and scan time within single breath-hold. Conspicuity of eight ductal segments was graded by two experienced raters using a 4-point score. 3D GRASE MRCP outperformed 2D thick-slab FSE MRCP in the common bile duct and common hepatic duct (both with p < 0.001), but compared inferiorly in the right anterior hepatic duct (p < 0.001), right posterior hepatic duct (p < 0.005) and pancreatic duct distal (p < 0.05). Performing both 3D and 2D MRCP would reduce the number of non-diagnostic readings in the left hepatic duct to 10 remaining (5.3%), compared with 31 (16.3%) or 21 (11.1%) out of 190 readings if using 3D GRASE or 2D thick-slab FSE alone, respectively. Although 3D GRASE MRCP is preferential to visualize the common bile duct and common hepatic duct within one single breath-hold, the complementary role of 2D thick-slab FSE MRCP in smaller hepatic and pancreatic ducts makes it a useful adjunct if performed additionally. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:14:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2612202012031800.pdf: 6605958 bytes, checksum: 680ef152be34ad8fb9d569e393422331 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書…………………………………………………………i 誌謝………………………………………………………………………ii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………iii Abstract…………………………………………………………………..iv Contents…………………………………………………………………..v List of figures…………………………………………………………….vii List of tables……………………………………………………………..viii Chapter 1 Introduction ………………………………………………….. 1 Chapter 2 FSE and GRASE sequences …………………………………. 4 2.1 FSE technique for MRCP ………………………………….. 4 2.2 GRASE technique …………………………………………. 7 2.3 Disadvantages of GRASE ………………………………..10 2.4 Unique advantages of GRASE ……………………………11 Chapter 3 Materials and Methods ………………………………………..14 3.1 Subjects …………………………………………………...14 3.2 Image acquisition …………………………………………15 3.3 Performance evaluation …………………………………..18 Chapter 4 Results ………………………………………………………...21 Chapter 5 Discussions and Conclusion …………………………………..29 5.1 Discussion ………………………………………………...29 5.2 Limitation …………………………………………………30 5.3 Conclusion ………………………………………………...34 Appendage ………………………………………………………………..35 Reference …………………………………………………………………38 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 2D厚片取樣 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 3D影像 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 單一次閉氣 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 梯度及自旋回聲 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 磁振膽道胰管造影 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | MR cholangiopancreatography | en |
| dc.subject | 3D imaging | en |
| dc.subject | breath-hold | en |
| dc.subject | gradient- and spin-echo | en |
| dc.subject | 2D thick-slab acquisition | en |
| dc.title | 3T MRI單次閉氣之膽道胰管磁振造影：比較3D GRASE 及 2D FSE 成像結果 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | MRCP at 3T in a single breath-hold: comparative effectiveness between 3D gradient- and spin-echo and 2D thick-slab fast spin-echo acquisitions | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李潤川(Run-Chuan Lee),劉昌憲(Chang-Sian Liou),阮春榮(Chun-Jung Juan),黃騰毅(Teng-Yi Huang),林益如(Yi-Ru Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 2D厚片取樣,3D影像,單一次閉氣,梯度及自旋回聲,磁振膽道胰管造影, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | 2D thick-slab acquisition,3D imaging,breath-hold,gradient- and spin-echo,MR cholangiopancreatography, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 43 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202004465 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-01-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生醫電子與資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 生醫電子與資訊學研究所 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2612202012031800.pdf Restricted Access | 6.45 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.