請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73009完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姜皇池 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ta-Chen Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳大楨 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:13:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-07-23 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-23 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bibliography
About WCPFC, The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission. Retrieved from https://www.wcpfc.int/about-wcpfc Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (UN Fish Stocks Agreement), DOALOS/UNITAR BRIEFING ON DEVELOPMENTS IN OCEAN AFFAIRS AND THE LAW OF THE SEA 20 YEARS AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA, Sept. 25-26, 2002. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_20years/1995 FishStockAgreement_ATahindro.pdf Agreements that conferring Jurisdiction, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Retrieved from https://www.itlos.org/jurisdiction/international-agreements-conferring-jurisdictio n-on-the-tribunal/ Boyle A. E. (1997), Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 46, 37-54 Chambers, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Retrieved from https://www.itlos.org/the-tribunal/chambers/ Competence, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Retrieved from https://www.itlos.org/jurisdiction/competence/ Djalal H. (2006), The Emergence of the Concept of Fishing Entities: A Note, Ocean Dev. & Int'l L., 37, 117-122. Eiriksson G. (2000), The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea , The Leiden, Netherland : Martinus Nijhoff. Gau S.T. (2006), The Practice of the Concept of Fishing Entities: Dispute Settlement Mechanisms, Ocean Dev. & Int'l L., 37, 221-244 Ho S. C. (2006), The Impact of the U.N. Fish Stocks Agreement on Taiwan's Participation in International Fisheries Fora, Ocean Dev. & Int'l L., 37, 133-148 Home, South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation. Retrieved from https://www.sprfmo.int Hsieh P. L. (2008), AN UNRECOGNIZED STATE IN FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS: THE CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA ON TAIWAN, Michigan Journal of Intl. L., 28, 765- 813. Hu N. T. (2006), Fishing Entities: Their Emergence, Evolution, and Practice from Taiwan's Perspective, Ocean Dev. & Int'l L., 37, 149-180 International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (1998), International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Yearbook (Vol. 2). Leiden, Netherland: Brill. Mensah T. A. (2001), The Competence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea outside the Framework of the Convention on the Law of the Sea, Zbornik PFZ, 51, 873-884 Mensah T. A. (1998), The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Leiden J.I.L., 11, 527-546 Mensah T. A. (1999), The Jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, The Rabel J. Comp. & Int’l Private L., 63 no.2, 330-341 Molenaar E. J. (2011), Non-Participation in the Fish Stocks Agreement: Status and Reasons, The Int’l J. of Marine & Coastal L., 26, 195-234 Noyes J. E. (1999), International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Cornell Intl. L. J., 32, 110- 182 Oxman B. H. (2005), Does the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Have Jurisdiction over Disputes with Taiwan?”, Taiwan International Law Quarterly, 200503(2:1), 205-226 O'Connell D.P. (1970), International Law (2nd ed., Vol. 1). London, England: Stevens and Sons. Portmann R. (2010), Legal Personality in International Law, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press Rosenne S. and Sohn L. B. (Eds.) (1989) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary (Vol. 5), Leiden, Netherland: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Rao S. P. and Gautier P. (2018), The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea :Law, Practice and Procedure, Camberley, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Scovazzi T. (2013), Within and Beyond Mutatis Mutandis in Responsibility of International Organizations Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (pp.121-132), Leiden, Netherland: Brill. Serdy A. (2005), BRINGING TAIWAN INTO THE INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES FOLD: THE LEGAL PERSONALITY OF A FISHING ENTITY in British Yearbook of International Law (pp. 183-221), Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Seymour J. (2006), The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: A Great Mistake?, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 13, 1-35 Strategic Plan for the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna 2015-2020, Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna.Retrieved from https://www.ccsbt.org/sites/default/files/userfiles/file/docs_english/operational_r esolutions/CCSBT_Strategic_Plan.pdf Treves T. (2007), The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Oil and Gas Industry, Second International Oil and Gas Conference –Managing Risk – Dispute Avoidance and Resolution, Symposium conducted at the meeting of World Petroleum Council, London, England. Retrieved from https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/statements_of_president/wolfru m/treves_oil_gas_200907_eng.pdf Tsamenyi M. (2006), The Legal Substance and Status of Fishing Entities in International Law: A Note, Ocean Dev. & Int'l L., 37, 123-132 Wang K. H. (2006), Taiwan's Participation in Regional Fisheries Management Organizations and the Conceptual Revolution on Fishing Entity: The Case of the IATTC, Ocean Dev. & Int'l L., 37, 209-220 Wolfrum R. (1999), The Legislative History of Articles 20 and 21 of the Statute of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, The Rabel J. Comp. & Int’l Private L. 63 no.2, 342-349 高聖惕(2007)，〈論國際漁業法中涉及捕魚實體的爭端解決機制(上)〉，《政大法 學評論》，第 95 期，229-263 頁 International Instruments Arrangement for the Participation of Fishing Entities, The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission Convention for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fisheries Resources in the North Pacific Ocean Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fishery Resources in the South Pacific Ocean Convention for the Strengthening of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission established by the 1949 Convention between the United States of America and the Republic of Costa Rica Resolution To Establish an Extended Commission and an Extended Scientific Committee and Rules of Procedure of the Extended Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna, Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna Statue of International Tribunals For the Law of the Sea The United Nations Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 Cases Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), Case No.3 and 4, Order (Aug. 27, 1999), ITLOS Reparations for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations Reparation, Advisory Opinion, 1949, ICJ No. 4 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73009 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文之目的在於分析捕魚實體於國際海洋法法庭之進用性。自聯合國魚群 協定生效後，現今的捕魚實體已然成為國際間針對高度洄游魚種及跨界魚種養護 管理的活躍參與者之一。儘管臺灣至今仍未成為聯合國魚群協定的參與方，臺灣 已以捕魚實體之身份成為眾多國際區域性漁業管理組織之委員會成員。
考量到今日捕魚實體在國際間高度洄游魚種及跨界魚種養護管理的密切連 結及參與，本論文主張管轄權具有相當彈性的國際海洋法法庭應可供捕魚實體所 進用。 儘管捕魚實體已參與眾多國際間區域性漁業組織並在高度洄游魚種及跨界 魚種養護管理上擁有舉足輕重的地位，目前國際間尚無關於捕魚實體法人格的權 威論述。捕魚實體法人格之內涵不僅涉及捕魚實體的相關權利義務，也同時間接 影響到國際海洋法法庭對於捕魚實體有無管轄權。因此，本論文除了分析國際海 洋法法庭的屬人管轄規範外，更著重於捕魚實體之法人格及其與國際海洋法法庭 的屬人管轄規範之互動。 本論文首先分析國際海洋法法庭的屬人管轄規範之界線。進一步，本論文依 循現行的相關國際法原則，並從中提出可供判斷捕魚實體法人格之判準。最後， 本論文整合上開分析，並提出捕魚實體進用國際海洋法庭之界線。 本論文主張捕魚實體可就下列種類之爭端進用國際海洋法法庭，該等爭端種 類分別為:(1)涉及國家管轄下區域內及公海上之高度洄游魚種及跨界魚種養護 管理措施相容性(2)涉及與高度洄游魚種及跨界魚種養護管理措施有關之港口 國措施(3) 涉及區域性漁業組織之高度洄游魚種及跨界魚種養護管理措施所生 的船旗國責任 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis illustrates and analyzes the access to ITLOS of the fishing entity. The fishing entity has been an active participant in global conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks since the adoption of UNFSA. Despite that Taiwan remains non-party to UNFSA, Taiwan has participated in several commissions of RFMOs as fishing entity. Taking the fishing entity’s deep involvement in the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks into consideration, this thesis proposes that ITLOS, an international tribunal with flexible jurisdiction on maritime disputes, shall be open to the fishing entity.
While the fishing entity has participated in several RFMOs and gained significance in the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks, there is yet any depiction on the legal personality of fishing entity. The legal personality of the fishing entity not only affects relevant rights and obligations of the fishing entity, but also relevant to the jurisdiction of ITLOS. Hence, this thesis focuses on the personal jurisdiction of ITLOS and its interactions with the legal personality of the fishing entity. This thesis firstly analyzes the outline of the personal jurisdiction of ITLOS. Further, this thesis proposes applicable criteria derived from the general rules of international law and determines the legal personality of the fishing entity. Lastly, this thesis integrates the findings of this thesis and proposes the outline of access to ITLOS of the fishing entity. This thesis concludes that fishing entity possesses access to ITLOS concerning disputes concerning: (1) compatibility of the conservation and management measures of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks adopted in areas under national jurisdiction and those adopted in high seas (2) port state measures concerning conservation and management measures of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks (3) flag state duties concerning conservation and management measures of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks of RFMOs. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:13:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R04a21090-1.pdf: 873938 bytes, checksum: 8d07dcd77cffd61e71c71d3f352d435e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | I.INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1
II.THESIS OUTLINE..................................................................................................6 III.JURISDICTION RATIONE PERSONAE IN JURISDICTIONS OF ITLOS...8 A.INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................8 B.COMPULSORY JURISDICTION ..................................................................................9 1. Basis of Compulsory Jurisdiction: LOSC ...........................................................9 2. Provisional Measures of Article 290.5 of LOSC ..............................................11 3. Prompt Release of Vessels and Crews..............................................................14 4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................16 C.CONSENSUAL JURISDICTION .................................................................................16 1. Bases of Consensual Jurisdiction: LOSC and Statue of ITLOS .......................16 2. Personal Jurisdiction of Consensual Jurisdiction Established by LOSC.........18 3. Personal Jurisdiction Established by ITLOS....................................................19 D.CHAMBERS............................................................................................................22 1. Overview ...........................................................................................................22 2. Conclusion ........................................................................................................23 E.CONCLUSION ON PERSONAL JURISDICTION OF ITLOS.........................................24 1. General Analysis of Personal Jurisdiction of ITLOS .......................................24 2. The Need to Provide Framework of Personal Jurisdiction of ITLOS ..............25 IV. LEGAL PERSONALITY OF FISHING ENTITY UNDER ITLOS ...............27 A. ESTABLISHED RULES ON LEGAL PERSONALITY AND THE IMPLIED ACCESS TO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISMS ..................................................................................27 B.RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF FISHING ENTITY...................................................32 UNFSA ..............................................................................................................32 RFMOs..............................................................................................................39 Analysis and Conclusion on Rights and Obligations of Fishing Entity............66 C.FISHING ENTITY'S ENTITLEMENT TO SETTLE ITS RIGHTS AND OBLIGATION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW 1.UNFSA ..............................................................................................................68 2.IATTC ...............................................................................................................72 3. CCSBT Extended Commission..........................................................................73 4.WCPFC .............................................................................................................75 5.NPFC ................................................................................................................78 6.SPRFMO ...........................................................................................................80 7.Conclusion on Access to International Tribunals of Fishing Entity.................84 D.INTEGRATED ANALYSIS ON ACCESS TO ITLOS OF THE FISHING ENTITY............84 V. POTENTIAL DISAGREEMENT ON THE FISHING ENTITY’S ACCESS TO ITLOS. ..............................................................................................................................87 A.INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................87 B.FISHING ENTITY’S NON-PARTY STATUS TO UNFSA............................................88 1.Arguments .........................................................................................................88 2.Comments .........................................................................................................90 C.MUTATIS MUTANDIS?..............................................................................................92 1.Arguments .........................................................................................................92 2.Comments .........................................................................................................94 D.OVERALL COMMENTS ON POTENTIAL ARGUMENTS ............................................96 VI.CONSLUSION AND COMMENTS 98 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................101 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 捕魚實體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國際海洋法法庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 屬人管轄 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 法人格 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 魚群協定 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | UNFSA | en |
| dc.subject | ITLOS | en |
| dc.subject | Personal Jurisdiction | en |
| dc.subject | Legal Personality | en |
| dc.subject | Fishing Entity | en |
| dc.title | 捕魚實體於國際海洋法法庭之進用性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Access to ITLOS of Fishing Entity | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳雨蒼,陳貞如 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 捕魚實體,國際海洋法法庭,屬人管轄,法人格,魚群協定, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Fishing Entity,ITLOS,Personal Jurisdiction,Legal Personality,UNFSA, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 106 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901494 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 853.46 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。