請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72697
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥 | |
dc.contributor.author | You-Xiang Song | en |
dc.contributor.author | 宋友翔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:03:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Reference
[1] Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C. R., & Tsoulouhas, T. 2006. Are outsiders handicapped in CEO successions? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3): 619-644. [2] Allen, M. P., Panian, S. K., & Lotz, R. E. 1979. Managerial succession and organizational performance: a recalcitrant problem revisited. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2): 167-180. [3] Ansari, I. F., Goergen, M., & Mira, S. 2014. The determinants of the CEO successor choice in family firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28: 6-25. [4] Barker III, V. L., & Mueller, G. C. 2002. CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6): 782-801. [5] Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1): 99-120. [6] Barron, J. M., Chulkov, D. V., & Waddell, G. R. 2011. Top management team turnover, CEO succession type, and strategic change. Journal of Business Research, 64(8): 904-910. [7] Beyer, J. M., Chattopadhyay, P., George, E., Glick, W. H., Ogilvie, D. T., & Pugliese, D. 1997. The selective perception of managers revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), pp.716-737. [8] Biggs, E. L. 2004. CEO succession planning: An emerging challenge for boards of directors. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1): 105-107. [9] Boeker, W. 1992. Power and managerial dismissal: Scapegoating at the top. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3): 400-421. [10] Boeker, W. 1997. Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 152-170. [11] Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. 1993. Performance and successor choice: The moderating effects of governance and ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 172-186. [12] Bommer, W. H., & Ellstrand, A. E. 1996. CEO successor choice, its antecedents and influence on subsequent firm performance: An empirical analysis. Group & Organization Management, 21(1): 105-123. [13] Borokhovich, K. A., Parrino, R., & Trapani, T. 1996. Outside directors and CEO selection. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3): 337-355. [14] Byrne, D., Clore, G. I., & Worchel, P. 1966. The effect of economic similarity-dissimilarity as determinants of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4: 220-224. [15] Cannella, A. A., & Lubatkin, M. 1993. Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4): 763-793. [16] Cannella, A. A., & Shen, W. 2001. So close and yet so far: Promotion versus exit for CEO heirs apparent. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 252-270. [17] Cao, Q., Maruping, L. M., & Takeuchi, R. 2006. Disentangling the effects of CEO turnover and succession on organizational capabilities: A social network perspective. Organization Science, 17(5): 536-576. [18] Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management journal, 44(4): 639-660. [19] Chaganti, R., & Sambharya, R. 1987. Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management. Strategic management journal, 8(4): 393-401. [20] Chen, G., & Hambrick, D. C. 2012. CEO replacement in turnaround situations: Executive (mis) fit and its performance implications. Organization Science, 23(1): 225-243. [21] Chen, C. J., & Huang, Y. F. 2010. Creative workforce density, organizational slack, and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 63(4): 411-417. [22] Chung, C. N., & Luo, X. R. 2013. Leadership succession and firm performance in an emerging economy: Successor origin, relational embeddedness, and legitimacy. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3): 338-357. [23] Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95-S120. [24] Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. 2007. How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8): 767-789. [25] Crossland, C., Zyung, J., Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. 2014. CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3): 652-674. [26] Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. 1983. Inside/outside succession and organizational size: The pragmatics of executive replacement. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4): 736-742. [27] Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. 1985. Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: an empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 28(4): 749-762. [28] Daniel, F., Lohrke, F. T., Fornaciari, C. J., & Turner Jr, R. A. 2004. Slack resources and firm performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(6): 565-574. [29] Datta, D. K., & Guthrie, J. P. 1994. Executive succession: organizational antecedents of CEO characteristics. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7): 569-577. [30] Datta, D. K., & Rajagopalan, N. 1998. Industry structure and CEO characteristics: an empirical study of succession events. Strategic Management Journal, 19(9): 833-852. [31] Datta, D. K., Rajagopalan, N., & Zhang, Y. 2003. New CEO openness to change and strategic persistence: The moderating role of industry characteristics. British Journal of Management, 14(2): 101-114. [32] Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. 1984. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1): 52-73. [33] Elsaid, E., & Ursel, N. D. 2011. CEO succession, gender and risk taking. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 26(7): 499-512. [34] Finkelstein, S., & Boyd, B. K. 1998. How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management journal, 41(2): 179-199. [35] Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1990. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative science quarterly, 35(3): 484-503. [36] Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and their Effects on Organizations. West Publishing: St. Paul, M. [37] Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. 2009. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press. [38] Friedman, S. D., & Saul, K. 1991. A leader's wake: Organization member reactions to CEO succession. Journal of Management, 17: 619-642. [39] Friedman, S. D., & Singh, H. 1989. CEO succession and stockholder reaction: The influence of organizational context and event content. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4): 718-744. [40] Gamson, W. A., & Scotch, N. A. 1964. Scapegoating in baseball. American Journal of Sociology, 70(1): 69-72. [41] Geletkanycz, M. A. 1997. The salience of ‘culture’s consequences’: The effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo. Strategic Management Journal, 18(8): 615-634. [42] Geletkanycz, M. A., & Black, S. S., 2001. Bound by the past? Experience-based effects on commitment to the strategic status quo. Journal of Management, 27(1): 3-21. [43] Georgakakis, D., & Ruigrok, W. 2017. CEO succession origin and firm performance: A multilevel study. Journal of Management Studies, 54(1): 58-87. [44] Giambatista, R. C., Rowe, W. G., & Riaz, S. 2005. Nothing succeeds like succession: A critical review of leader succession literature since 1994. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(6): 963-991. [45] Grusky, O. 1960. Administrative succession in formal organizations. Social Forces, 39(2): 105-115. [46] Guest, R. H. 1962. Managerial succession in complex organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 68(1): 47-56. [47] Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of management journal, 49(4): 693-706. [48] Guthrie, J. P., & Datta, D. K. 1997. Contextual influences on executive selection: Firm characteristics and CEO experience. Journal of Management Studies, 34(4): 537-560. [49] Hambirck, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32: 334-343. [50] Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 659-684. [51] Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. 1987. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in organizational behavior, 9: 369-406. [52] Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M., & Fredrickson, J. 1993. Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 401-418. [53] Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2): 193-206. [54] Hambrick, D. C., & Quigley, T. J. 2014. Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4): 473-491. [55] Haveman, H. 1992. Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 48-75. [56] Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. 2002. CEO successor characteristics and the choice of foreign market entry mode: An empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3): 551-569. [57] Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. 2009. Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of management, 35(6): 1404-1427. [58] Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2): 323-329. [59] Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. 1993. Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 80-105. [60] Karaevli, A. 2007. Performance consequences of new CEO “outsiderness”: moderating effects of pre- and post-succession contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 681-706. [61] Karaevli, A., & Zajac, E. J. 2013. When do outsider CEOs generate strategic change? The enabling role of corporate stability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7): 1267-1294. [62] Katz, R. 1982. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative science quarterly, 27: 81-104. [63] Kesner, I. F., & Dalton, D. R. 1994. Top management team turnover and CEO succession: an investigation of the effects of turnover on performance. Journal of Management Studies, 31(5): 701-713. [64] Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. 1982. Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Administrative science quarterly, 27(4): 548-570. [65] Lester, R. H., Hillman, A., Zardkoohi, A., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. 2008. Former government officials as outside directors: The role of human and social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5): 999-1013. [66] Lin, W. T., & Liu, Y. 2012. Successor characteristics, organisational slack, and change in the degree of firm internationalisation. International Business Review, 21(1): 89-101. [67] Luo, Y. 2003. Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13): 1315-1327. [68] Magnusson, P., & Boggs, D. J. 2006. International experience and CEO selection: An empirical study. Journal of International Management, 12(1): 107-125. [69] March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1): 71-87. [70] Miller, D. 1991. Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science, 37(1): 34-52. [71] Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. 1998. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research policy, 27(5): 507-523. [72] Musteen, M., Barker III, V. L., & Baeten, V. L. 2006. CEO attributes associated with attitude toward change: The direct and moderating effects of CEO tenure. Journal of Business Research, 59(5): 604-612. [73] Parrino, R. 1997. CEO turnover and outside succession: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 46: 165-197. [74] Quigley, T. J., & Hambrick, D. C. 2012. When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 834-859. [75] Sambharya, R. B. 1996. Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of US multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 17(9): 739-746. [76] Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A. 2002. Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impact of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 717-733. [77] Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of management Journal, 29(3): 562-585. [78] Thomas, A. S., Litschert, R. J., & Ramaswamy, K. 1991. The performance impact of strategy‐manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic management journal, 12(7): 509-522. [79] Tsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, C. A. 1989. Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 402-423. [80] Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. 1985. Organizational evolution: a metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 171-122. [81] Tushman, M. L., & Rosenkopf, L. 1996. Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the U.S. cement industry. Management Science, 42: 939-953. [82] Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. 2011. Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of business venturing, 26(3): 341-358. [83] Virany, B., Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. 1992. Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organization Science, 3(1): 72-91. [84] Waller, M. J., Huber, G. P., & Glick, W. H. 1995. Functional background as a determinant of executives' selective perception. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4): 943-974. [85] Weisbach, M. S. 1995. CEO turnover and the firm’s investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(2): 159-188. [86] Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2): 171-180. [87] Westphal, J. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. 2001. Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12): 1113-1137. [88] Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 1995. Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative science quarterly, 40(1): 60. [89] Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management journal, 35(1): 91-121. [90] Zajac, E. J. 1990. CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: a theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3): 313-330. [91] Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. 1996. Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 64-90. [92] Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. 2003. Explaining new CEO origin: firm versus industry antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3): 327-357. [93] Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. 2004. When the known devil is better than an unknown god: An empirical study of the antecedents and consequences of relay CEO successions. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4): 483-500. [94] Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. 2010. Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3): 334-346. [95] Zhu, D. H., & Shen, W. 2016. Why do some outside successions fare better than others? The role of outside CEOs’ prior experience with board diversity. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13): 2695-2708. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72697 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 企業執行長(CEO),身為經營團隊中最高階的領導者,負責組織各項重大決策並掌管組織各項日常業務,對公司經營成敗具有關鍵性的影響。而當組織面臨領導人更迭時,如何確保繼任者能夠善用組織資源與能力,並配合內、外部環境以制定合適的策略,使企業達成卓越的績效,不論在理論或實務上都是一個非常值得關注的議題。因此,與CEO傳承有關的研究在策略管理及組織行為等領域中自1960年代開始即如雨後春筍般地出現。經過逾50年的發展,關於CEO傳承的研究已經發展成為兩個主流。其中一個流派側重於CEO繼任者的選擇,包括傳承類型(如:內部拔擢或外部空降)和繼任者的特徵(如:人力資本)。而另一個流派則主要探討CEO傳承後的結果,包括策略變革和公司績效。然而,在這些研究文獻中,主要探討的是環境層級與組織層級相關變數與CEO傳承之間的關係,較少研究考慮到個人層級的變數(如前任CEO的人格特質)對繼任者選擇的影響。有鑑於此,本研究目標為檢視前、後任CEO的人力資本(產業經驗與專業職能)之間的關係,以及組織寬裕資源的調和作用。本研究以美國製造業公司為研究對象,自2010年至2014年間所發生的253個CEO傳承事件作為研究樣本。實證研究結果顯示,前任CEO的人力資本與繼任CEO的人力資本之間存在著正向的線性關係,而組織寬裕資源在此關係中則有負向的調和效果。本研究透過建構個人層級的理論架構補足了過去的研究缺口;同時,也對組織在選擇CEO繼任者時所面臨到的策略考量提出具有管理意涵的建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | CEO succession, which refers to the process by which boards of directors ensure that their organization has the ability to sustain excellence in CEO leadership over time, is one of the most crucial events in the life of any organization. Over the past five decades, research on CEO succession has evolved into two main streams. One stream focuses on the selections of CEO successors, including succession types and successors’ characteristics. The other stream has devoted to the outcomes of CEO succession, including the strategic change and post-succession performance. Among the classes of research, however, very little empirical work has considered the individual level. In view of the scarce work on the individual level, this study examines the relationship between predecessor CEO’s characteristics and successor CEO’s characteristics in terms of industrial experience and functional expertise, as well as the moderating effect of organizational slack. Drawing observations from 253 CEO successions in 242 publicly traded, U.S. manufacturing firms between 2010 and 2014, this study suggests that There is a positive relationship between predecessor CEO’s human capital and successor CEO’s human capital. In addition, organizational slack plays a negatively moderating role in this relationship. This study complements the research gap by developing a framework describing the individual level of succession event. Besides, more strategic insights may be generated from this study for the selection of CEO successor. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:03:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06741051-1.pdf: 1138063 bytes, checksum: 7b1ac9f2883b75400c7fa3cb830302df (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
誌謝 i 中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii CONTENTS iv LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF TABLES vii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research background 1 1.2 Research questions 4 1.3 Research procedure 4 1.3.1 The structure of this study 4 1.3.2 Research flow 5 Chapter 2 Literature review 7 2.1 Selections of CEO successor 8 2.1.1 Succession types 8 2.1.2 Successors’ characteristics 9 2.1.3 Determinants of successors 10 2.2 Outcomes of CEO succession 17 2.2.1 Strategic change 17 2.2.2 Post-succession performance 18 2.3 Theory and hypotheses 23 2.3.1 The relationship between predecessor human capital and successor industrial experience 24 2.3.2 The relationship between predecessor human capital and successor functional expertise 26 2.3.3 Moderating effect of organizational slack 28 Chapter 3 Research framework and methodology 31 3.1 Research framework 31 3.2 Data collection and sample 32 3.3 Measures 32 3.3.1 Dependent variable 32 3.3.2 Independent variable 33 3.3.3 Moderating variable 34 3.3.4 Control variable 34 3.4 Model specifications 37 Chapter 4 Results 39 4.1 Descriptive statistics 39 4.2 Empirical results 40 Chapter 5 Discussion and conclusion 48 5.1 Theoretical implications 49 5.2 Managerial implications 52 5.3 Limitation and future direction 53 REFERENCE 55 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 前、後任CEO人力資本之關係研討─組織寬裕資源之調和效果 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The relationship between predecessor CEO’s human capital
and successor CEO’s human capital─ The moderating roles of organizational slack | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳忠仁 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭詠璋,郭佳怡 | |
dc.subject.keyword | CEO傳承,人力資本,產業經驗,專業職能,組織寬裕資源, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | CEO succession,human capital,industrial experience,functional expertise,Organizational slack, | en |
dc.relation.page | 65 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902069 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。