請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72555完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張佑宗 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wen-Chien Hu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 胡文茜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T07:00:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-08-07 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-07 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王振寰、錢永祥，1995，〈邁向新國家？民粹威權主義的形成與民主問題〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，20：17-55。
宋佩芬，2014，〈中國的公民教育與威權韌性:教科書的政治社會化〉，《當代教育研究季刊》，22(2)：93-131。 周嘉辰、謝銘元，2018，〈威權體制內部的民主制度:中國大陸民衆體制內政治參與對其政治態度的影響〉，《政治學報》，66：1-28。 林宗弘，2007，〈民主與威權的制度績效:亞洲四小龍政治經濟發展的量化分析〉，《台灣政治學刊》，11(1)：3-67。 汪宏倫，2014，〈理解當代中國民族主義：制度、情感結構與認識框架〉，《文化研究》，19：189-250。 施正鋒，2016，〈中國的民族主義〉，《臺灣國際研究季刊》，12(2)：41-71。 孫代堯，2019，〈威權政體及其轉型：理論模型和研究途徑〉，《文史哲》，5：144-150。 馬得勇，2007，〈政治信任及其起源—對亞洲8個國家和地區的比較研究〉，《經濟社會體制比較》，5：79-86。 張佑宗，2009，〈搜尋台灣民粹式民主的群眾基礎〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，75：85-113。 游宇、王正緒，2014，〈互動與修正的政治信任——關於當代中國政治信任來源的中觀觀理論〉，《經濟社會體制比較》，2：179-195。 項繼權、俞秋陽，2017，〈威權主義的韌性:理論解釋及其局限〉，《江海學刊》，3：110-116。 黃信豪，2011，〈民主態度的類型:台灣民眾二次政黨輪替後的分析〉，《選舉研究》，18(1)：1-34。 黃信豪，2015，〈解析中國社會的政治支持:續效困境觀點的檢驗〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，16(2)：41-94。 黃信豪，2016，〈大眾民主認知與政治學習-不同政治體制的比較分析〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，13(3)：1-44。 劉性仁，2009，〈中國大陸愛國主義與民族主義之概念性研究〉，《復興崗學報》，93：133-149。 鄭振清、蘇毓淞、張佑宗，2018，〈公眾政治支持的社會來源及其變化—基於2015年“中國城鄉社會治理調查”(CSGS)的實證研究〉，《政治學研究》，3：5。 龍太江、王邦佐，2005，〈經濟增長與合法性的'政績困局”〉，《復旦學報》3：169-17。 Akkerman, Agnes Mudde, Cas Zaslove, Andrej 2014. 'How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters.' Comparative political studies 47(9): 1324-1353. Almond, Gabriel Abraham and Sidney Verba.1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations, Princeton university press. Aslanidis, Paris.2016. 'Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective.' Political Studies 64: 88-104. Attane, I. and Y. Courbage.2000. 'Transitional stages and identity boundaries: The case of ethnic minorities in China.' Population and Environment 21(3): 257-280. Aytaç, S Erdem and Ziyaöniş.2014. 'Varieties of populism in a changing global context: the divergent paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo.' Comparative Politics 47(1): 41-59. Bell, Daniel A.2009. Beyond liberal democracy: Political thinking for an East Asian context, Princeton University Press. Benedict, Anderson.1987. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, Verso. Brady, A. M.2009. 'Mass Persuasion as a Means of Legitimation and China's Popular Authoritarianism.' American Behavioral Scientist 53(3): 434-457. Braithwaite, Valerie and Margaret Levi.1998. Trust and governance, Russell Sage Foundation. Breslin, Shaun 2009. 'Understanding China's regional rise: interpretations, identities and implications.' International Affairs 85(4): 817-835. Brubaker, Rogers.2009. 'Ethnicity, race, and nationalism.' Annual Review of Sociology 35: 21-42. Cai, Yongshun.2008. 'Power structure and regime resilience: contentious politics in China.' British journal of political science 38(3): 411-432. Canovan, Margaret 2004. 'Populism for political theorists?' Journal of Political ideologies 9(3): 241-252. Canovan, Margaret 1999. 'Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy.' Political Studies 47(1): 2-16. Catterberg, Gabriela and Alejandro Moreno.2006. 'The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies.' International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18(1): 31-48. Chandler, David 2013. 'International statebuilding and the ideology of resilience.' Politics 33(4): 276-286. Chen, Dan 2017. 'Local distrust and regime support: Sources and effects of political trust in China.' Political Research Quarterly 70(2): 314-326. Chen, Jie.2004. Popular political support in urban China, Woodrow Wilson Center Press. Chen, Jie, Yang Zhong and Jan William Hillard.1997. 'The level and sources of popular support for China's current political regime.' Communist and Post-Communist Studies 30(1): 45-64. Chu, Yun-Han. 2013. 'Sources of regime legitimacy and the debate over the Chinese model.' China Review: 1-42. Chu, Yun-Han, Yu-Tzung Chang and Ming-Hua Huang.2004. 'Modernization, institutionalism, traditionalism, and the development of democratic orientation in rural China.' A comparative survey of democracy, governance and development: 1-46. Cohen, Jean L and Andrew Arato.1994. Civil society and political theory, MIT press. Dalton, Russell J.2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices. The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Comparative Politics), Oxford University Press, UK. Dalton, Russell J and Nhu-Ngoc T Ong.2005. 'Authority orientations and democratic attitudes: A test of the ‘Asian values’ hypothesis.' Japanese Journal of Political Science 6(2): 211-231. Damico, Alfonso J, M Margaret Conway and Sandra Bowman 'Patterns of political trust and mistrust: Three moments in the lives of democratic citizens.' Polity 32(3): 377-400. Di Tella, Torcuato S 1997. 'Populism into the twenty‐first century.' GovernmentOpposition 32(2): 187-200. Dickson, Bruce J 2005. 'Populist authoritarianism: the future of the Chinese Communist Party.' Occasional Papers. Carnegie Endorsement for International Peace. Dimitrov, Martin.2008. 'The resilient authoritarians.' Current History 107(705): 24. Dimitrov, Martin K.2013. Why communism did not collapse: Understanding authoritarian regime resilience in Asia and Europe, Cambridge University Press. Dorraj, Manochehr and Michael Dodson.2009. 'Neo-populism in comparative perspective: Iran and Venezuela.' Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa 29(1): 137-151. Easton, David.1975. 'A re-assessment of the concept of political support.' British journal of political science 5(4): 435-457. Eckstein, Harry. 1988. 'A culturalist theory of political change.' American Political Science Review (82)3: 789-804. Elchardus, Mark and Bram Spruyt.2016. 'Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology.' Government Opposition 51(1): 111-133. Fewsmith, J. and A. J. Nathan.2019. 'Authoritarian Resilience Revisited: Joseph Fewsmith with Response from Andrew J. Nathan.' Journal of Contemporary China 28(116): 167-179. Geddes, Barbara and John Zaller.1989. 'Sources of popular support for authoritarian regimes.' American Journal of Political Science: 319-347. Gellner, Ernest and John Breuilly.1983. Nations and nationalism, Cornell University Press Ithaca, NY. Gilley, Bruce 2008. 'Legitimacy and institutional change: the case of China.' Comparative Political Studies 41(3): 259-284. Goodwyn, Lawrence.1978. The populist moment: A short history of the agrarian revolt in America, Oxford University Press. Gries, P.2018. 'Contesting Cyberspace in China: Online Expression and Authoritarian Resilience.' Perspectives on Politics 16(4): 1131-1132. Hadiz, Vedi R and Angelos Chryssogelos.2017. 'Populism in world politics: A comparative cross-regional perspective.' International Political Science Review 38(4): 399-411. Hetherington, Marc J.2005. Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism, Princeton University Press. Ho, Benjamin Tze Ern 2018. 'Power and Populism: What the Singapore Model Means for the Chinese Dream.' The China Quarterly 236: 968-987. Hobsbawm, Eric J.2012. Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality, Cambridge university press. Holbig, Heike and Bruce Gilley.2010. 'Reclaiming legitimacy in China.' Comparative Political Studies 38(3): 395-422. Hui, W.2014. 'The Crisis of Representativeness and Post-Party Politics.' Modern China 40(2): 214-239. Huntington, Samuel P.1993. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century, University of Oklahoma press. Inglehart, Ronald.1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies, Princeton university press. Inglehart, Ronald 2006. 'Mapping global values.' International studies in sociology and social anthropology 104(11). Inglehart, Ronald and Wayne E Baker.2000. 'Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values.' American sociological review: 19-51. Jackman, Robert W, and Ross A. Miller.1996 'A Renaissance of Political Culture?.' American Journal of Political Science 40.3 (1996): 632-59. Jansen, Robert S.2011. 'Populist mobilization: A new theoretical approach to populism.' Sociological theory 29(2): 75-96. Jenkins, J Craig.1983. 'Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements.' Annual Review of Sociology 9(1): 527-553. Kaase, M., & Newton, K. 1995. Beliefs in government (Vol. 5). OUP Oxford. Keele, Luke.2007. 'Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government.' American Journal of Political Science 51(2): 241-254. Kellas, James G.1991. Politics of nationalism and ethnicity, Macmillan International Higher Education. Kennedy, John James.2009. 'Maintaining popular support for the Chinese Communist Party: the influence of education and the state-controlled media.' Political Studies 57(3): 517-536. King, Gary, Jennifer Pan and Margaret E Roberts.2014. 'Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation.' Science 345(6199): 1251722. Kriesi, Hanspeter.2014. 'The populist challenge.' West European Politics 37(2): 361-378. Lawrence, Paul.2005. Nationalism: history and theory, Pearson Longman. Braithwaite, Valerie and Margaret Levi.1998. Trust and governance, Russell Sage Foundation. Levitsky, Steven and James Loxton.2013. 'Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes.' Democratization 20(1): 107-136. Levitsky, Steven and Lucan Way.2002. 'The rise of competitive authoritarianism.' Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51-65. Li, Cheng 2012. 'The end of the CCP's resilient authoritarianism? A tripartite assessment of shifting power in China.' The China Quarterly 211: 595-623. Li, Lianjiang.2004. 'Political trust in rural China.' Modern China 30(2): 228-258. Linz, Juan J.1985. Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, Addison-Wesley. Lipset, Seymour Martin and William Schneider.1983. 'The decline of confidence in American institutions.' Political Science Quarterly 98(3): 379-402. Minxin, Pei.2006. China’s trapped transition, Harvard University Press. Minxin, Pei and Minxin Pei.2009. From reform to revolution: The demise of communism in China and the Soviet Union, Harvard University Press. Minzner, Carl.2015. 'China after the reform era.' Journal of Democracy 26(3): 129-143. Mishler, William and Richard Rose.1997. 'Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies.' The journal of politics 59(2): 418-451. Mishler, William and Richard Rose.2001. 'What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies.' Comparative Political Studies 34(1): 30-62. Muller, Edward N, Thomas O Jukam and Mitchell A Seligson.1982. 'Diffuse political support and antisystem political behavior: A comparative analysis.' American Journal of Political Science: 240-264. Murillo, M Victoria.2000. 'From populism to neoliberalism: labor unions and market reforms in Latin America.' World Politics 52(2): 135-168. Murphy, E. C.2008. 'Institutions, Islam and Democracy Promotion: Explaining the Resilience of the Authoritarian State.' Mediterranean Politics 13(3): 459-466. Nathan, A. J.2003. 'Authoritarian resilience.' Journal of Democracy 14(1): 6-17. Newton, Kenneth.2001. 'Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy.' International Political Science Review 22(2): 201-214. Norris, Pippa.1999. Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government, OUP Oxford. Norris, Pippa.2011. Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited, Cambridge University Press. O'donell, Guillermo A.1994. 'Delegative democracy.' Journal of Democracy 5(1): 55-69. O'donnell, Guillermo A.1999. Counterpoints: selected essays on authoritarianism and democratization, Univ of Notre Dame Pr. Ortmann, Stephan and Mark R Thompson.2018. 'Introduction: The “Singapore model” and China's Neo-Authoritarian Dream.' The China Quarterly 236: 930-945. Pang, B. Q., S. Keng and L. N. Zhong.2018. 'Sprinting with Small Steps: China's Cadre Management and Authoritarian Resilience.' China Journal 80: 68-93. Pei, Minxin 2002. 'China's governance crisis.' Foreign Affairs 81: 96. Pei, Minxin 2012. 'Is CCP rule fragile or resilient?' Journal of Democracy 23(1): 27-41. Perry, Elizabeth 2012. 'The Illiberal Challenge of Authoritarian China.' Taiwan Journal of Democracy 8(2). Perry, Elizabeth J 2007. 'Studying Chinese politics: farewell to revolution?' The China Journal(57): 1-22. Putnam, Robert.1973. The beliefs of politicians: ideology, conflict, and democracy in Britain and Italy, Yale University Press. Putnam, Robert D, Robert Leonardi and Raffaella Y Nanetti.1994. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton university press. Roberts, Kenneth M.2006. 'Populism, political conflict, and grass-roots organization in Latin America.' Comparative Politics: 127-148. Rooduijn, Matthijs and Teun.2011. 'Measuring populism: Comparing two methods of content analysis.' West European Politics 34(6): 1272-1283. Saich, Tony.2007. 'Citizens’ perceptions of governance in rural and urban China.' Journal of Chinese Political Science 12(1): 1-28. Schedler, Andreas.2002. 'The menu of manipulation.' Journal of Democracy 13(2): 36-50. Schubert, Gunter 2008. 'One-party rule and the question of legitimacy in contemporary China: Preliminary thoughts on setting up a new research agenda.' Journal of Contemporary China 17(54): 191-204. Schulz, Anne, Philipp Müller, Christian Schemer, Dominique Stefanie Wirz, Martin Wettstein and Werner Wirth.2017. 'Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions.' International Journal of Public Opinion Research 30(2): 316-326. Shi, Tianjian.2008. 'China: Democratic values supporting an authoritarian system.' How east Asians view democracy: 209-237. Shi, Tianjian 2001. 'Cultural values and political trust: a comparison of the People's Republic of China and Taiwan.' Comparative Politics: 401-419. Snyder, Jack.2017. 'The modernization trap.' Journal of Democracy 28(2): 77-91. Stanley, Ben 2008. 'The thin ideology of populism.' Journal of Political ideologies 13(1): 95-110. Stokes, Donald E.1962. 'Popular evaluations of government: An empirical assessment.' Ethics bigness: Scientific, academic, religious, political, military 61-72. Taggart, Paul.2000. 'Populism: Concepts in the social sciences.' Philadelphia: Open. Tang, Wenfang and Benjamin Darr.2012. 'Chinese nationalism and its political and social origins.' Journal of Contemporary China 21(77): 811-826. Tong, Jingrong.2011. Investigative journalism in China: Journalism, power, and society, Bloomsbury Publishing USA. Tucker, Andrew.2004. 'The role of reflexive trust in modernizing public administrations.' Public performance management review 28(1): 53-74. Uslaner, Eric M.2002. The moral foundations of trust, Cambridge University Press. Wang, R.2017. 'Authoritarian Resilience Versus Everyday Resistance: The Unexpected Strength of Religious Advocacy in Promoting Transnational Activism in China.' Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 56(3): 558-576. Wang, Zhengxu.2005. 'Before the emergence of critical citizens: Economic development and political trust in China.' International Review of Sociology 15(1): 155-171. Wang, Zhengxu.2005. 'Political trust in China: Forms and causes.' Legitimacy: ambiguities of political success or failure in East and Southeast Asia 114. Wasserstrom, Jeffrey N.2018. Popular protest and political culture in modern China, Routledge. Weiss, Jessica Chen.2008. Powerful patriots: nationalism, diplomacy, and the strategic logic of anti-foreign protest, UC San Diego. Welsh, Marc 2014. 'Resilience and responsibility: governing uncertainty in a complex world.' The Geographical Journal 180(1): 15-26. Weyland, Kurt.1999. 'Neoliberal populism in Latin America and eastern Europe.' Comparative Politics: 379-401. Weyland, Kurt 2003. 'Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: how much affinity?' Third World Quarterly: 1095-1115. Wilson, Richard W.1992. Compliance ideologies: Rethinking political culture, Cambridge University Press. Wong, Timothy Ka-Ying, Po-San Wan and Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao.2011. 'The bases of political trust in six Asian societies: Institutional and cultural explanations compared.' International Political Science Review 32(3): 263-281. Wu, Cary and Rima Wilkes.2018. 'Local–national political trust patterns: Why China is an exception.' International Political Science Review 39(4): 436-454. Wu, Yu-Shan.2005. 'Taiwan's Domestic Politics and Cross-Strait Relations.' The China Journal(53): 35-60. Xiaojun, Yan 2011. 'Regime inclusion and the resilience of authoritarianism: the local people's political consultative conference in post-Mao Chinese politics.' The China Journal(66): 53-75. Xu, Ben.2001. 'Chinese populist nationalism: Its intellectual politics and moral dilemma.' Representations 76(1): 120-140. Yang, Qing and Wenfang Tang.2010. 'Exploring the sources of institutional trust in China: culture, mobilization, or performance?' Asian Politics Policy 2(3): 415-436. Zhang, K. P. and T. G. Meng.2018. 'Political elites in deliberative democracy: beliefs and behaviors of Chinese officials.' Japanese Journal of Political Science 19(4): 643-662. Zhao, Dingxin.2009. 'The mandate of heaven and performance legitimation in historical and contemporary China.' American Behavioral Scientist 53(3): 416-433. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72555 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文主要是在探討中國威權韌性的來源，將民粹主義與民族主義作為解釋變項，分析中國是否存在具有「委任式民意」特質的民粹民族主義，且對此種政治態度是否影響威權體制的政治支持？
本文利用亞洲民主動態調查第四波中國大陸地區問卷資料進行統計分析。研究結果發現，在中國，具有民粹民族主義政治態度的比例最高，而民粹民族主義者為受現代化影響程度較低的群體。通過對於制度認同及政治信任來測量威權體制的政治支持，驗證本文的研究假設，具有民粹民族主義政治價值者，對於制度認同及中央權威機構的政治支持程度較高，但對於實際治理機構的認同程度較低，顯示出差序性政治信任以及對威權體制抱有「委任式民意」的政治支持。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Why China's authoritarian regime has not failed? Scholar explain that authoritarian regime got resilience. This study focus on the influence of ideology, analysis that whether Chinese got populism and nationalism as political attitudes, and will the political support for the authoritarian regime influenced by populist nationalism? This study assumed that those who got populist nationalism might have higher political support for authoritarian regime, and it can explains why China got its authoritarian resilience.
My research uses the fourth wave of Asian Barometer Survey in China. The results show that in China, the proportion of people with the value of populist nationalism is the highest, while people who got populist nationalism are those less affected by modernization. By measuring the political support of the authoritarian regime for institutional identity and political trust, find out those who have the value of populist nationalism have higher political support for institutional identity and trust of central authority institution, but they got less political trust with the actual governance institutions. It shows hierarchical political trust and the authoritarian regime remain its legitimacy from populism and nationalism ideology in China. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T07:00:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R04322004-1.pdf: 2160044 bytes, checksum: eac401bec894467be0a7c946986ee65a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
謝辭 II 中文摘要 III 英文摘要 IV 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究緣起與問題意識 1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題 6 第三節 研究設計 8 第四節 研究架構 9 第五節 章節安排說明 13 第二章 威權體制與意識型態 15 第一節 威權韌性與意識型態 15 第二節 意識型態的定義與發展 17 第三節 意識型態對政治態度的影響 28 第三章 建構民粹民族主義與其群眾基礎 37 第一節 建構民粹民族主義 37 第二節 民粹民族主義的群眾基礎 42 第四章 民粹民族主義的政治態度 53 第一節 威權韌性的來源 53 第二節 測量政治支持 63 第三節 政治態度的迴歸分析 68 第五章 結論 80 第一節 主要研究發現 80 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 83 參考資料 86 附錄：迴歸模型變項處理 98 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 威權韌性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 民粹民族主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政權支持 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治態度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 意識形態 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Political Attitude | en |
| dc.subject | Populist Nationalism | en |
| dc.subject | Regime Support | en |
| dc.subject | Ideology | en |
| dc.subject | Authoritarian Resilience | en |
| dc.title | 中國民粹民族主義與威權韌性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Populist Nationalism and Authoritarian Resilience in China | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳親恩,黃凱苹 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 威權韌性,民粹民族主義,政權支持,政治態度,意識形態, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Authoritarian Resilience,Populist Nationalism,Regime Support,Political Attitude,Ideology, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 101 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902290 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-02 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。