請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72370
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周中哲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ting Lien | en |
dc.contributor.author | 連奕婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:38:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2028-08-15 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Lopez Garcia, D., & Soong, T. T. (2002). Efficiency of a simple approach to damper allocation in MDOF structures. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 9(1), 19-30.
2. AIJ. (2001). Recommendation for the design of Base Isolated Buildings, Architectural Institute of Japan. 3. Ogawa, K., Kamura, H., & Inoue, K. (1999). Modeling of the moment resistant frame to fishbone-shaped frame for the response analysis. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), 64(521), 119-126. 4. Hwang, J. S., Lin, W. C., & Wu, N. J. (2013). Comparison of distribution methods for viscous damping coefficients to buildings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(1), 28-41. 5. Building Seismic Safety Council (US), United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency, & Applied Technology Council. (1997). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (Vol. 1). Federal Emergency Management Agency. 6. FEMA, N. (2000). NEHRP, Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (No. 356). Report. 7. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (US), Building Seismic Safety Council (US), & United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2001). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Building Seismic Safety Council. 8. Raggett, J. D. (1975). Estimating damping of real structures. Journal of the structural division, 101(ASCE# 11554 Proceeding). 9. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. (1991). Part 1–Provisions, Building Sesimic Safety Council, Washington, D.C., 52. 10. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. (1994). Part 1–Provisions, Building Sesimic Safety Council, Washington, D.C., 76. 11. Kasai, K., Fu, Y., & Watanabe, A. (1998). Passive control systems for seismic damage mitigation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124(5), 501-512. 12. KASAI, K., ITO, H., & OGURA, T. (2008). Passive Control Design Method Based on Tuning of Equivalent Stiffness of Bilinear Oil Damper. J. Struct. Constr. Eng., (630), 1281-1288. 13. Chou, C. C., Chen, Y. C., Chung, P. T., Pham, D. H., & Liu, J. H. (2013). Low-damage earthquake-resisting systems using sandwiched buckling-restrained braces and dual-core self-centering braces. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 353, pp. 1946-1958). Trans Tech Publications. 14. American Concrete Institute, & International Organization for Standardization. (2014). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary. American Concrete Institute. 15. American Institute of Steel Construction. (2010). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10). American Institute of Steel Construction. 16. American Society of Civil Engineers. (2010). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (Vol. 7). American Society of Civil Engineers. 17. Karthik, M. M., & Mander, J. B. (2010). Stress-block Parameters for Unconfined and Confined Concrete Based on a Unified Stress-strain Model. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(2), 270-273. 18. Dowell, O. K., Seible, F., & Wilson, E. L. (1998). Pivot Hysteresis Model for Reinforced Concrete members. ACI Structural Journal, 95, 607-617. 19. Linde, P. (1993). Numerical modelling and capacity design of earthquake-resistant reinforced concrete walls (Vol. 200). Birkhäuser. 20. Linde, P., & Bachmann, H. (1994). Dynamic modelling and design of earthquake‐resistant walls. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 23(12), 1331-1350. 21. Dynamic Isolation Systems, Inc. (2016). Viscous Wall Dampers - Guidelines for Modeling. Dynamic Isolation Systems, Inc., USA. 22. Sharma, A., Eligehausen, R., & Reddy, G. R. (2013). Pivot Hysteresis Model Parameters for Reinforced Concrete Columns, Joints, and Structures. ACI Structural Journal, 110(2), 217. 23. Tsai, K. C., & Lin, B. Z. (2003). User Manual for the Platform and Visualization of Inelastic Structural Analysis of 3D Systems PISA3D and VISA3D. Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, National Taiwan University, Report No. CEER/R92-07. 24. Imbsen, C. C. (2002). XTRACT Software, Cross Section Analysis Program for Structural Engineers. Imbsen and Associates. 25. Lin, R. C., Liang, Z., Soong, T. T., Zhang, R. H., & Mahmoodi, P. (1991). An Experimental Study on Seismic Behaviour of Viscoelastically Damped Structures. Engineering Structures, 13(1), 75-84. 26. Zhang, R. H., & Soong, T. T. (1992). Seismic Design of Viscoelastic Dampers for Structural Applications. Journal of Structural Engineering, 118(5), 1375-1392. 27. Zhang, R. H., Soong, T. T., & Mahmoodi, P. (1989). Seismic Response of Steel Frame Structures with Added Viscoelastic Dampers. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 18(3), 389-396. 28. Wu, Z., & Huang, N. E. (2009). Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition: A Noise-Assisted Data Analysis Method. Advances in adaptive data analysis, 1(01), 1-41. 29. Huang, M. L. Wu, S. R. Long, S. S. Shen, W. D. Qu, P. Gloersen, and K. L. Fan (1998). The Empirical Mode Decomposition and the Hilbert Spectrum for Nonlinear and Non-Stationary Time Series Analysis. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, Vol. 454, No. 1971, pp. 903-995). 30. KASAI, K. (1995). Seismic analysis and design using viscoelastic dampers. シンポジウム [耐震設計の一つの新しい方向], 113-140. 31. 建築物速度型被動消能元件設計手冊之研擬,中華民國內政部建築研究所,中華民國96年。 32. 建築物耐震設計規範,中華民國內政部營建署,中華民國100年。 33. 鋼結構極限設計法規範,中華民國內政部營建署,中華民國99年。 34. 鋼骨鋼筋混凝土構造設計規範與解說,中華民國內政部營建署,中華民國100年。 35. 混凝土結構設計規範,中華民國內政部營建署,中華民國100年。 36. 周中哲,曾冠霖,陳永祥,張陸滿 (2015) 「レバー式粘弾性振動吸収装置」日本發明專利(公開日:2015.07.27,公開番号:2015-135175)。 37. 周中哲,曾冠霖,陳永祥,張陸滿 (2015)「制震裝置」中國發明專利(公布日:2015.07.22,公布号:CN 104790548 A)。 38. 周中哲,曾冠霖,陳永祥,張陸滿 (2017)「制震裝置」中華民國發明專利(公告日:2017.02.21,證書號數:I571550)。 39. 李森柟 (2001) 「壁式黏彈性阻尼器於建築結構之應用」碩士論文指導教授:張國鎮,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 40. 蕭輔沛,鍾立來,葉勇凱,簡文郁,沈文成,邱聰智,周德光,趙宜峰,翁樸文,楊耀昇,褚有倫,凃耀賢,柴駿甫,黃世建,「校舍結構耐震評估與補強技術手冊(第三版)」,國家地震工程研究中心研究報告,NCREE 13-023,台北,2013。 41. 凌郁婷. (2016).「雙核心自復位斜撐與夾型挫屈束制斜撐於臺灣實際高層建築之耐震行為: 非線性地震歷時分析與斜撐耐震試驗」碩士論文指導教授:周中哲,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 42. 黃俊翔. (2017).「槓桿黏彈性制震壁之發展與實驗驗證及其在高科技廠房之應用評估」碩士論文指導教授:周中哲,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 43. 曾文豪.(2018).「新型槓桿黏彈性制震壁之動力特性及試驗」,碩士論文指導教授:周中哲,國立臺灣大學土木工程系 44. 莊宗諺. (2010).「應用 VE Damper 控制高科技廠房結構地震反應之研究」碩士論文指導教授:陳永祥,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 45. 黃世建,林永健,蔡仁傑,曾建創,涂耀賢,蕭輔沛 (2016) 「鋼筋混凝土開口牆受剪破壞之側力位移曲線預測」結構工程,31(3),82-103。 46. 翁樸文, 李翼安, 蔡仁傑, & 黃世建. (2016). 低矮型鋼筋混凝土剪力牆之側力位移曲線預測. 結構工程, 31(1), 37-60. 47. 蔡仁傑. (2015).「鋼筋混凝土開口牆之側力位移曲線預測」碩士論文指導教授:黃世建,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 48. 蔡佳恩. (2013).「精密儀器之石英砂隔振平臺微振動特性研究」碩士論文指導教授:周中哲,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 49. 林柏州. (2003).「物件導向非線性靜動態三維結構分析程式之研發」碩士論文指導教授:蔡克銓,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 50. 張國鎮,黃震興,蘇晴茂 (2014)「結構消能減震控制及隔震設計」全華圖書股份有限公司。 51. 鄭兆麟, & 陳正誠. (2010). 完全合成 SRC 梁之強度與耐震設計. 建築學報, (71), 73-90. 52. 石井正人,北村春幸,和田章,笠井和彦 (2000)「粘弾性型制振部材付き架構のモデル化に関する検討」日本建築学会構造系論文集,65(531),55-62。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72370 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 槓桿黏彈性制震壁(Lever Viscoelastic Wall, LVEW)與傳統壁式黏彈性阻尼器最大不同處在於其加裝槓桿、摩擦阻尼器與限位裝置,可在不同等級地震力作用下具備不同消能機制。對於高科技廠房而言,裝置LVEW能同時確保強震下廠內生命財產安全及中小地震乃至環境微小振動下製程設備精度與產品良率,但目前國內外規範當中,阻尼器之設計阻尼比與配置方法尚未有具體的建議與規定,鑑此,本研究將針對此種新式消能裝置發展出可應用於工程界的配置流程,過程中依據不同結構物週期提出加裝阻尼器結構之彈性反應預測公式,以公式中的阻尼比或勁度參數作為設計目標,發展三種適用於黏彈性阻尼器的簡易分配流程,其兼具減震效益、經濟價值與時間成本之優勢。
為了瞭解LVEW於三種分配理論下所提供的耐震效益,本研究選取南部高科技廠房與新竹標準廠房作為分析標的,使用PISA3D軟體建立非線性數值模型,其中南部高科技廠房採用簡化機制降低模型的複雜性,並以系統識別驗證其可信度。此外,LVEW所配置的組數會因模型簡化而與實際情況不符,亦提出配置LVEW相對應之簡化,此舉可有效提升不同分配法下模型的分析效率。本研究訂定位移降幅30%與60%兩種設計目標,採用三種分配理論配置LVEW,進行模態分析、非線性靜力側推分析與動力歷時分析,其中地震歷時的選取為八組臺灣與世界各地強地動紀錄,對其分別調整至尖峰地表加速度Elastic(0.036 g)、DBE(0.28 g)與MCE(0.36 g)三種等級地震,並由彈性動力歷時分析結果顯示三種分配法與降幅預測式皆有良好之準確度,由非線性動力歷時分析結果顯示配置LVEW構架在非線性反應具備減震效益。最後,針對兩棟結構物之特性與需求,於減震效益與經濟價值兩層面提出建議,探討不同結構特性的廠房所適用之配置方式。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The difference between the Lever Viscoelastic Wall (LVEW) and the traditional viscoelastic wall is the addition of pivot, stopper and friction device. LVEW improves the energy dissipation of structures based on different mechanism and kinematics for different earthquake levels. For high-tech factories, LVEW is able to ensure the structural safety during a big earthquake (e.g., above design basis earthquake level and equal to maximum considered earthquake level) and control the impact of environmental vibration making the process equipment operate normally during a small earthquake (e.g., below design basis earthquake level). However, both design damping ratio and distribution method of the dampers are no specific recommendations and regulations in existing seismic design codes. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop distribution procedure of this new energy dissipating device, which can be applied to pratical design. Based on structural periods, using different formula of structural elastic response prediction to calculate the damping ratio or stiffness parameter as the design demand, developing three types of simple distribution methods for viscoelastic dampers, which combines the advantages of seismic benefit, economic value and time cost.
In order to evaluate the seismic performance of an existing building with LVEWs in three types of distribution methods, a high-tech factory in Tainan, Taiwan and a high-rise steel factory in Hsinchu, Taiwan were selected and modeled by a computer program. A high-tech factory used simplified model to reduce the complexity of structure, and the reliability of this model was verified by system identification. In addition, the number of LVEW will be inconsistent with the actual situation due to simplified model, hence the corresponding simplification of LVEW is also proposed, which can improve the analysis efficiency for the models in different distribution methods. The design demand is set to 30% and 60% for the displacement reduction, and the LVEWs were installed in PISA3D model based on three types of distribution theories. The seismic performance was evaluated by modal analysis, nonlinear static pushover analysis and nonlinear dynamic time history analysis. Eight earthquake records of Taiwan and the rest of the world were selected to adjust to the three peaks of Elastic (0.036 g), DBE (0.28 g) and MCE (0.36 g). The results of the elastic dynamics analysis showed that all three methods can achieve the reduction prediction and inelastic dynamics analysis showed the seismic benefit of the building with LVEWs. Lastly, according to the characteristics and requirements of the two structures, suggestions of distribution methods will be discussed in aspects of seismic benefit and economic value. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:38:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05521239-1.pdf: 15496843 bytes, checksum: 5a50a1d7d907a55b849b1fa04c5513fb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 ii
誌謝 iii 摘要 iv ABSTRACT v 目錄 vii 表目錄 x 圖目錄 xii 第 1 章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 文獻回顧 2 1.2.1 被動控制系統 2 1.2.2 槓桿黏彈性制震壁 2 1.2.3 速度型阻尼器之初步設計 3 1.2.4 速度型阻尼器之最佳化配置 4 1.2.5 高科技廠房結構 5 1.3 研究動機與目的 6 1.4 論文架構 6 第 2 章 槓桿黏彈性制震壁構架之配置流程 7 2.1 外加槓桿黏彈性制震壁對構架彈性反應之降幅預測 8 2.1.1 等效阻尼比 8 2.1.2 力學行為 11 2.1.3 反應譜經驗式 16 2.2 槓桿黏彈性制震壁之分配理論 19 2.2.1 平均分配之理論 (Uniform Distribution, UD) 20 2.2.2 依樓層剪應變能分配之理論 (Distribution Based on Story Shear Strain Energy, SSSE) 23 2.2.3 依樓層勁度分配之理論 (Distribution Based on Story Shear Stiffness, SSS) 25 第 3 章 高科技廠房之模型建立 29 3.1 廠房結構物基本資訊 29 3.1.1 南部科學園區高科技廠房 29 3.1.2 新竹科學園區標準廠房 32 3.2 PISA3D桿件模擬 32 3.2.1 梁柱桿件模擬 33 3.2.2 格子梁樓板模擬 38 3.2.3 剪力牆模擬 38 3.2.4 槓桿黏彈性制震壁模擬 43 3.3 PISA3D模型簡化機制 45 3.3.1 簡化機制之理論背景 45 3.3.2 構架模型簡化之驗證 46 3.3.3 槓桿黏彈性制震壁配置之模型簡化與驗證 47 3.4 高科技廠房模型建立、模態分析與驗證 49 3.4.1 槓桿黏彈性制震壁參數 49 3.4.2 南部科學園區高科技廠房模型建立 50 3.4.3 新竹科學園區標準廠房模型建立 54 3.4.4 訊號處理與系統識別 56 第 4 章 槓桿黏彈性制震壁應用於高科技廠房之耐震分析 60 4.1 非線性靜力側推分析 60 4.1.1 南部科學園區高科技廠房 60 4.1.2 新竹科學園區標準廠房 62 4.2 地震歷時紀錄之選取與調整 63 4.3 彈性動力歷時分析下之構架反應 65 4.3.1 南部科學園區高科技廠房 65 4.3.2 新竹科學園區標準廠房 72 4.4 非線性動力歷時分析下之構架反應 79 4.4.1 南部科學園區高科技廠房 79 4.4.2 新竹科學園區標準廠房 84 第 5 章 結論與建議 90 參考文獻 95 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 槓桿黏彈性制震壁的配置對高科技廠房耐震行為影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Distribution of Lever Viscoelastic Wall Dampers on the Seismic Performance of High-Tech Factories | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張陸滿,陳永祥,盧煉元,黃震興 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 槓桿黏彈性制震壁,黏彈性阻尼器,摩擦阻尼器,加裝阻尼器結構之彈性反應預測,阻尼器分配理論,高科技廠房,簡化機制,非線性動力歷時分析, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Lever Viscoelastic Wall Damper,Viscoeastic Damper,Friction Device,Elastic Response Prediction of Structure with Damper,High-Tech Factory,Simplified Theory,Nonlinear Dynamic Time History Analysis, | en |
dc.relation.page | 227 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803577 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 15.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。