Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71999
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭麗珍 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-Ju Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳玟如 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:18:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-21 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
方欹葳(2016)。當前台灣女性賦權-以酒類廣告探討之。國立政治大學社會學系博士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9wt2fy 王皇玉(2004)。論施用毒品行為之犯罪化。臺大法學論叢,33(6),39-76。doi: 10.6199/NTULJ.2004.33.06.02 王皇玉(2010)。臺灣毒品政策與立法之回顧與評析。月旦法學雜誌,180,80-96。 王藝陵(2010)。乳癌婦女的創傷後成長對其安適感之影響:手術距今時間、診斷期數及人格特質可能的調節角色。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c9d7yh 古登儒(2014)。更生遊民復歸社會的歷程:返家路迢遙。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/txc3zp 朱真一(2012)。臺灣的鴉片戰爭(十七)-林清月醫師的鴉片引研究。台北市醫師公會會刊,56(6)74-78。 江振亨(2009)。從復原力探討矯治社會工作在犯罪矯治之運用與發展。社區發展季刊,125,424-439。 江振亨、林瑞欽(2000)。認知行為團體療法對濫用葯物者輔導成效之研究。犯罪學期刊,(5),277-309。 江振亨、陳憲章、劉亦純、邱鐘德、李俊珍(2011)。戒治團體方案對受戒治人心理變項與再犯與否之成效評估研究。犯罪學期刊,14(2),41-97。 江振亨、黃秀瑄、林瑞欽(2006)。男性安非他命濫用者之性格特質、用藥非理性信念、用藥渴求與復發意向之研究。犯罪與刑事司法研究,(7),35-80。 江振亨(2003)。吸毒者用葯循環歷程之研究。彰化師大輔導學報,(25),25-62。doi:10.7040/GJ.200310.0025 余育斌、許華孚(2005)。藥物濫用少年與其社會網絡之互動要素分析:以明陽中學收容少年為例。犯罪學期刊,8(1),65-97。 吳佳芳、林玲伊(2014)。台灣成年自閉症者生活品質之研究。臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌,10(1),1-11。doi:10.6534/jtotrp.2014.10(1).01 宋麗玉、施教裕、徐淑婷(2009)。優勢觀點與精神障礙者之復元:駱駝進帳與螺旋上升。臺北市:紅葉文化。 李明濱等人(2009)。心情溫度計。臺北市:臺灣自殺防治學會全、全國自殺防治中心。 李政忠(2004)。網路調查所面臨的問題與解決建議。資訊社會研究,(6),1-24。 李美華譯(1998)。社會科學研究方法(原作者:Earl Babbie)。臺北市:時英。(原著出版年1998) 束連文、王思樺(2016)。物質濫用的防治政策與防治網絡,蔡佩真(主編)。物質濫用社會工作實務手冊,17-32。台北:巨流。 沈乃璿(2010)。女性尋求輔助與替代療法(CAM)經驗之研究。國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qkv4w8 林明潔(2008)。藥物濫用者有無繼續施用傾向量表之量化修正研究。犯罪學期刊,11(1),45-74。 林建陽、陳玉書(2008)。除刑化毒品政策知己討-論我國毒品犯罪之戒治成效。刑事再犯防治政策研究成果發表-刑事政策走向與區之探討。取自https://antidrug.moj.gov.tw/dl-36-2f8b2de8-d253-4795-a485-ae1d7b957fd8.html 林茂榮、姚開屏、黃景祥、王榮德(1999)。臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷量尺語詞的選擇。中華公共衛生雜誌,18(4),262-270。doi:10.6288/CJPH1999-18-04-05 林健陽、陳玉書(2006)。毒品犯罪者社會適應與再犯之研究。台北:行政院國科會專題研究計畫。 法務部(2017a)。法務統計年報【表4-3. 監獄受刑人人數】。取自http://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/rjsdweb/book/Book_Detail.aspx?book_id=245 法務部(2017b)。法務統計年報【表4-37. 成年勒戒處所受觀察勒戒人數】。取自http://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/rjsdweb/book/Book_Detail.aspx?book_id=245 法務部(2017c)。法務統計年報【表4-41. 戒治所受戒治人人數】。取自http://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/rjsdweb/book/Book_Detail.aspx?book_id=245 法務部(2017d)。法務統計年報【表5-5. 地方法院檢察署附條件緩刑社區處遇案件收結情形】。取自http://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/rjsdweb/book/Book_Detail.aspx?book_id =245 法務部(2017e)。專題分析【毒品施用者戒癮治療概況分析資】。取自http://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/RJSDWEB/common/WebListFile.ashx?list_id=1484 法務部、衛生福利部、教育部(2016)。反毒大本營:歷年反毒報告書-【105年反毒報告書】。中華民國:法務部。取自https://antidrug.moj.gov.tw/dl-2402-1c0ece76-7774-42ae-806a-ce480fa02628.html 邱皓政(2010)。量化研究法(二)修訂版。臺北市:雙葉。 姚開屏(2002)。臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展與應用。臺灣醫學,6(2),193-200。doi:10.6320/FJM.2002.6(2).09 胡萃玲(1997)。藥癮復元者的藥癮歷程及相關要素之分析研究──以晨曦會受訪者為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學系碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5z5s5x 徐美苓、熊培伶、賴若函、吳姿嫺、施馨堯(2011)。是減害還是加害?愛滋新聞論述中的毒癮者框架。臺灣社會研究季刊,(81),79-128。 張伯宏、郭文正、鄭安凱(2008)。藥癮者復發風險預測之實證研究。犯罪與刑事司法研究,(11),133-167。 張偉雄、王暢(2008)。因果關係理論的建立-結構方程模型。陳曉萍、徐淑英、樊景立、鄭伯壎等著,組織與管理研究的實證方法。臺北市:華泰文化。 張雅惠(2008)。藥物濫用者對疾病認知與求醫行為之相關性研究-以某戒治所為例。中國醫藥大學醫務管理學研究所碩士論文,台中市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6h86k2 張麗玉(2010)。矯正機關毒癮愛滋收容人團體處遇模式之研究。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系博士論文,南投縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ej5yqt 畢恆達(2013)。研究倫理。瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國區主編,社會及行為科學研究法-總論與量化研究法(35-62頁)。臺北市:東華書局。 莊永明(1998)。臺灣醫療史。台北市,遠流。 許玉河(2005)。日治時期澎湖鸞堂的戒煙運動。紀麗美編,澎湖研究第四屆學術研討會論文輯。澎湖市:澎湖縣文化局,46-66。 許華孚、林正昇(2009)藥癮戒治者的社會復歸與社會支持系統之研究,刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集, 12:53-80。 許嘉純、姚開屏、胡海國、熊秉荃(2005)。臺灣版精神分裂症病人生活品質評量表:信度與效度之研究。臺灣精神醫學,19(1),33-46。 郭文正(2011)。藥癮者社會支持、壓力知覺與戒癮改變階段之模式建構。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/en2n2a 郭家妤(2013)。毒癮愛滋更生人復原力之研究─以高屏地區為例。國立屏東科技大學社會工作系所碩士論文,屏東縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/a5fz8p 陳文添(1999)。淺釋日治時期的降筆會事件(上)。臺灣源流,13,71-83。 陳妙平(2005)。成年男性藥物成癮者復發決定因素之探究--以臺北戒治所為例。輔仁大學社會工作學系碩士論文,新北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/37dxgh 陳玟如(2004)。藥物濫用者復發歷程之研究。慈濟大學社會工作研究所碩士論文,花蓮縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/84bmz7 陳昱志(2011)。走在生命的黃磚路:貧窮女單親復原力因素與家庭適應關係之探究。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2gpjcd 陳若平、張佑綾等譯(2009)。社會工作研究法(原作者:Allen Rubin & Ear R Babbis)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年2005) 陳瑋婷(2012)。親職壓力、社會支持與生活品質之關係研究:身心障礙者家長與普通家長之比較。特殊教育研究學刊,37(3),1-26。doi:10.6172/BSE201211.3703001 陳碧珍(2005)。回家-藥癮戒治復原者重返家庭的歷程。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文,嘉義市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tha8w4 陳碧珍(2013)。出死入生─藥癮戒治者生命轉化的心理動力探究。輔仁大學心理學系博士論文,新北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7ue98q 陳樹德、傅大為、王道還譯(2017)。科學革命的結構(50周年紀念版)(原作者:Thomas S. Kuhn)。臺北市:遠流。(原著出版年1970) 湯宗泰(2010)。創新採用行動加值服務接受模式的徑路比較。中華管理評論國際學報,13(1),1-24。 黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式:理論與應用(五版)。臺北市:五南。 黃耀興(2013)。海洛因使用者相關心理社會復原指標之改變-治療性社區與美沙冬替代療法之比較。國立彰化師範大學復健諮商研究所碩士論文,彰化縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/63s687 楊瑞美(2003)。毒品政策對施用毒品者之影響--以某成年男性戒治所為例。國立臺灣大學社會工作學系碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/944f7y 溫福星、邱皓政(2009)。組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果:以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報,26(2),189-211。doi:10.6504/JOM.2009.26.02.05 董淑鈴(2000)。成年女性藥物濫用者復發歷程及其相關因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,高雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/47eqf2 廖敏策、吳雅潔、朱士傑、吳清平、蔡適鴻(2009)。海洛因濫用患者之照護。內科學誌,20(2),139-147。doi:10.6314/JIMT.2009.20(2).05 廖敏策、吳雅潔、朱士傑、吳清平、蔡適鴻(2009)。海洛因濫用患者之照護。內科學誌,20(2),139-147。doi:10.6314/JIMT.2009.20(2).05 蔡佩真(2015)。靈性與戒癮:基督教戒毒村海洛因戒癮者的靈性之旅。東吳社會工作學報,(28),109-137。 蔡坤衛(2016)。治療社區成年男性藥癮愛滋感染者治療期間心理調適之研究。國立高雄師範大學諮商心理與復健諮商研究所博士論文,高雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3zvwh8 蔡震邦(2009)。成年男性藥物濫用者復發預測之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文,高雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3k574j 蔡震邦(2011)。是復發?還是復原?-藥癮治療的新思維。輔導季刊,47(3),52-64。 衛生福利部、法務部、教育部、外交部(2014)。反毒大本營:歷年反毒報告書-【103年反毒報告書】。取自https://antidrug.moj.gov.tw/dl-78-3b2b4c5e-e9bb-4e00-8257-5211b3abcd57.html 蕭文龍(2009)。多變量分析最佳入門實用書(第二版):SPSS+LISER。臺灣:碁峰 。 蕭彣卉(2007)。病人與犯人:台灣百年來吸毒者的軌跡。國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/75k7h9 蕭怡真、陳俊元(2014)。保護傘或雙面刃?談社會資本對多重物質濫用之影響。中華心理衛生學刊,27(1),1-36。 鍾宏斌(2017)。我國的再犯率與監獄矯治效能─初探。台灣人權促進協會。取自 https://www.tahr.org.tw/news/2016 韓意慈(2016)。探究藥癮者之社會支持網絡樣貌-以某戒治所之男性個案為例。東吳社會工作學報,(30),31-59。 韓德彥、陳淑惠(2008)。精神疾病污名感受量表及其短版之心理計量特性。中華心理衛生學刊,21(3),273-290。 簡春安、鄒平儀(2004)。社會工作研究法。台北:巨流。 藍詩玲(2016)。鴉片戰爭:毒品,夢想與中國建構。八旗文化。 蘇悅中(2016)。物質濫用戒癮者的社區復健模式,蔡佩真(主編)。物質濫用社會工作實務手冊,208-228。台北:巨流。 英文文獻 Abbott, A. (1994). A feminist approach to substance abuse treatment and service delivery. Social Work in Health Care, 19(67-84). Alcoholics Anonymous World Service. (1952). Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Service, Inc. Amaro, H., & Schwartz, L. (2016). Measuring Recovery from Substance Use and Mental Disorder. Retrieved from Amato, F., & Macdonald, J. (2011). Examining risk factors for homeless men: Gender role conflict, help-seeking behaviors, substance abuse and violence. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 19(3), 227-235. doi:10.3149/jms.1903.227 Bertram, E. (1996). Drug war policy: The price of denial., University of California Press, Berkely. Best, D., & Aston, E. (2015). Long-term recovery from addiction. Criminal justice involvement and positive criminology. Positive criminology. Routledge frontiers of criminal justice, 23, 117-193. Betty Ford Institute., & Consensus Panel. (2007). ‘What is Recovery? A Working Definition from The Betty Ford Institute’. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 221-228. Betty Ford Institute., & Consensus Panel. (2009). What is recovery? Revisiting the Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel Definition. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7(4), 493-496. doi:10.1007/s11469-009-9227-z Boeri, M., Lamonica, A. K., & Harbry, L. (2011). Social Recovery, social capital, and drug courts. Prac Anthropol., 33, 8-13. Burns, J., & Marks, D. (2013). Can Recovery Capital Predict Addiction Problem Severity? Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 31(3), 303-320. doi:10.1080/07347324.2013.800430 Cano, I., Best, D., Edwards, M., & Lehman, J. (2017). Recovery capital pathways: Modelling the components of recovery wellbeing. Drug Alcohol Depend, 181, 11-19. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.002 Lo, C. C, Cheng, T. C., & de la Rosa IA. (2015). Depression and Substance Use: A Temporal-Ordered Model. Substance Use & Misuse, 50(10), 1274-1283. doi:10.3109/10826084.2014.998236. Chen, Y.-C., Chen, C.-K., Lin, S.-K., Chiang, S.-C., Su, L.-W., & Wang, L.-J. (2013). Health care service utilization and associated factors among heroin users in northern Taiwan. Addictive Behaviors, 38(11), 2635-2638. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.06.023 Chen, S. H., Hung, F. C., Lin,Y. S., & Tseng, H. M. (2002). Trauma and Psychosocial Aftermath among High- and Low-Exposure Adults Three Months post the 921 Chi-Chi Earthquake in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 167-188. [TSSCI] (中華心理學刊) Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (2008). Conceptualizing recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse, 43(12-13), 1971-1986. doi:10.1080/10826080802289762 Colpaert, F. C., Tarayre, J. P., Alliaga, M., Bruins Slot, L. A., Attal, N., & Koek, W.,. (2001). Opiate self-administration as a measure of chronic nociceptive pain in arthritic rats. Pain, 91(1), 33-45. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00413-9 Connolly, K., & Granfield, R.,. (2017). Building Recovery Capital: The Role of Faith-Based Communities in the Reintegration of Formerly Incarcerated Drug Offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 47(3), 370-382. Cooper, O. B., Brown, T. T., & Dobs, A. S. . (2003). Opiate drug use: A potential contributor to the endocrine and metabolic complications in human immunodeficiency virus disease. Clinical Infectious Disease, 37(s2), S132-S136. doi:10.1086/375879 Corcoran, J. (2001). Treatment approaches for child welfare mothers with addiction problems: An empirical review to guide practice. Journal of SocialWork Practice in the Addictions, 1(4), 5-24. Corrigan, P. (2004). How stigma interferes with mental health care. Am Psychol, 59(7), 614-625. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.614 Corrigan, P. W., Kuwabara, S. A., & O'Shaughnessy, J. (2009). The Public Stigma of Mental Illness and Drug Addiction. Journal of Social Work, 9(2), 139-147. doi:10.1177/1468017308101818 Corrigan, P. W., & Shapiro, J. R. (2010). Measuring the impact of programs that challenge the public stigma of mental illness. Clin Psychol Rev, 30(8), 907-922. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.004 Daddow, R., & Broome, S. (2010). Whole person recovery: a user-centred systems approach to problem drug use. Retrieved from http://www.thersa.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/362099/RSA-Whole-Person-Recovery-report.pdf Deady, M. (2009). A Review of Screening, Assessment and Outcome Measures for Drug and Alcohol Settings. USA: NIDA. Dean, A. J., Saunders, J. B., & Bell, J. (2011). Heroin use, dependence, and attitudes to treatment in non-treatment-seeking heroin users: A pilot study. . Substance Use & Misuse, 46(4), 417-425. doi:10.3109/10826084.2010.501655 Dennis, M., Scott, C. K., & Funk, R. (2003). An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26(3), 339-352. doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(03)00037-5 DiClemente, C. C. (2003). Addiction and Change: How Addictions Develop and Addicted People Recover (1 Ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Dolan, K., Salimi, S., Nassirimanesh, B., Mohsenifar, S., Allsop, D., & Mokri, A. (2011). Characteristics of Iranian women seeking drug treatment. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 20(11), 1687-1691. doi:10.1089/jwh.2010.2694 Doukas, N., & Cullen, J. (2009). Recovered, in Recovery or Recovering from Substance Abuse? A Question of Identity. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41(4), 391-3945. doi:10.1080/02791072.2009.10399778 Duffy, P., & Baldwin, H. (2013). Recovery post treatment- plans, barriers and motivators. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 8, 1-12. Retrieved from Evans, E., Li, L., Buoncristiani, S., & Hser, Y. I. (2014). Perceived neighborhood safety, recovery capital, and successful outcomes among mothers 10 years after substance abuse treatment. Subst Use Misuse, 49(11), 1491-1503. doi:10.3109/10826084.2014.913631 Fisher, G. L., & Roget, N. A.,. (2009). Encyclopedia of Substance Abuse Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery: SAGE Publications, Inc. Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (1996). The elephant that no one sees- natural recovery among middle-class addicts. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(1), 045-061. Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (2001). ‘Social Context and “Natural Recovery”: The Role of Social Capital in the Resolution of DrugAssociated Problems’. Substance Use and Misuse, 36(1543-1570). Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (2009). Social Context and “Natural Recovery”: The Role of Social Capital in the Resolution of Drug-Associated Problems. Substance Use & Misuse, 36(11), 1543-1570. doi:10.1081/ja-100106963 Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. ( 1999). Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment. New York: New York University Press. Granfield, R. & Cloud, W. ( 1999). Coming Clean: Overcoming Addiction Without Treatment. New York: New York University Press. Groshkova, T., Best, D., & White, W. (2013). The Assessment of Recovery Capital: properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug Alcohol Rev, 32(2), 187-194. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00489.x Havassy, B. E., Hall, S. M, & Wasserman, D. A. (1991). Social support and relapse commonalities among alcoholics opiate users and cigarette smokers. Addictive Behaviors, 16(5), 235-246. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(91)90016-B Hawkins, D. (2006). Science, social work, prevention: Findings and intersections. Social Work Research, 30(3), 137-152. Hennessy, E. A. (2017). Recovery capital: a systematic review of the literature. Addiction Research & Theory, 25(5), 349-360. doi:10.1080/16066359.2017.1297990 Hewitt. (2007). The influence of social recovery capital and stress on the health and well-being of individuals recovering from addiction. Humphreys, K., & Lembke, A. (2014). Recovery-oriented policy and care systems in the UK and USA. Drug Alcohol Rev, 33(1), 13-18. doi:10.1111/dar.12092 Humphreys, K., Moos, R. H., & Cohen, C. (1997). Social and community resources and long-term recovery from treated and untreated alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58(3), 231-238. doi:10.15288/jsa.1997.58.231 Jacobson, N. (2004). In Recovery: The Making of Mental Health Policy US: Vanderbilt University Press. Kaplan, H. B., & Johnson, R. J. . (1992). Relationships between circumstances surrounding initial illicit drug use and escalation of drug use: Moderating effects of gender and early adolescent experiences. Vulnerability to drug abuse, 229-358. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10107-011 Keene, J. (2010). Understanding drug misuse: Models of care and control. Basingstoke: England: Palgrave Macmillan. Kelly, J. F., & Greene, M. C.,. (2014). Beyond motivation: Initial validation of the commitment to sobriety scale. J Subst Abuse Treat, 46(2), 257-263. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2013.06.010 Kelly, J. F.,& Greene, M. C., (2014). Beyond motivation: Initial validation of the commitment to sobriety scale. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(2), 257-263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2013.06.010 Khantzian, E. J. (1985). The self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders: focus on heroin and cocaine dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142(11), 1259-1264. doi:10.1176/ajp.142.11.1259 Khantzian, E. J. A. M. J. (2008). Understanding Addiction as Self Medication: Finding Hope Behind the Pain (1 ed.): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Kubany, E. S., Leisen, M. B., Kaplan, A. S., Watson, S. B., Haynes, S. N., Owens, J. A., & Burns, K. (2000). Development and Preliminary Validation of a Brief Broad-Spectrum Measure of Trauma Exposure: The Traumatic Life Events Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 12(2), 210-224. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.210 Laudet, A. B. (2008). The Impact of Alcoholics Anonymous on other substance abuse related Twelve Step programs. Recent Dev Alcohol, 18, 71-89. Laudet, A. B., & White, W. (2010). What are your priorities right now? Identifying service needs across recovery stages to inform service development. J Subst Abuse Treat, 38(1), 51-59. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.06.003 Laudet, A. B., Morgen, K. M., & White, W. L. (2006). The role of social supports, spirituality, religiousness, life meaning and affiliation with 12-Step fellowships in quality of life satisfaction among individuals in recovery from alcohol and drug problems. Alcohol Treat Q, 24, 33-73. Laudet, A. B., & White, W. . (2008). Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction, and stress among former poly-substance users. Subst Use Misuse, 43(1), 27-54. doi:10.1080/10826080701681473 Lu, I.-C., Yen Jean, M.-C., Lei, S.-M., Cheng, H.-H., & Wang, J.-D. (2011). BSRS-5 (5-item Brief Symptom Rating Scale) scores affect every aspect of quality of life measured by WHOQOL-BREF in healthy workers. Quality of Life Research, 20(9), 1469–1475. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9889-4 Maris, C. W. (1999). The disasters of war: Amercian repression versus Dutch tolereance in drug policy. Jurnal of Drug Issues, 29(3), 493-510. Mäkelä, K. (1996). How to describe the domains of drinking and consequences. Addiction, 91(1447-1449). doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb02247.x NCADD(2017, August 12). Definition of Recovery [Web blog message]. Retrieved https://www.ncadd.org/people-in-recovery/recovery-definition/definition-of-recovery?highlight=WyJzYW1oc2EiLCJzYW1oc2EncyJd Neale, J., Finch, E., Marsden, J., Mitcheson, L., Rose, D., Strang, J., . . . Wykes, T. (2014). How should we measure addiction recovery? Analysis of service provider perspectives using online Delphi groups. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 21(4), 310-323. doi:10.3109/09687637.2014.918089 Neale J., T. C., Wheeler C., Finch E., Marsden J., Mitcheson L., Rose D., Wykes T. & Strang J. (2015). “You’re all going to hate the word ‘recovery’ by the end of this”: Service users’ views of measuring addiction recovery. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 22(1), 26-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2014.947564 Nelson, A. (2012). Social work with substance users. London: England: Sage. Ott, P. J., Tarter, R. E., Ammerman, R. T. (1999). Sourcebook on Substance Abuse: Etiology, Epidemiology, Assessment, and Treatment (2 ed.): Allyn & Bacon, Incorporated. Peters, R. H. (1993). Drug treatment in jails and detention settings. (Vol. 44-80). Newbury Park: CA: Sage. Porter, R., & Teich, M. . (1995). Drugs and narcotics in history. London, England: Cambridge University Press. Robins, L. N. (1980). The natural history of drug abuse. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 62(7-20). doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1980.tb10426.x Rokach, A. (2005). Drug Withdrawal and Coping with Loneliness. Social Indicators Research, 73(1), 71-85. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27522214 Rachel Gonzales,M. Douglas Anglin, Rebecca Beattie, Chris Angelo Ong, Deborah C. Glik.,(2012). Understanding Recovery Barriers: Youth Perceptions About Substance Use Relapse. Am J Health Behav. 2012 Sep; 36(5): 602–614. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.36.5.3 Robert J. Fisher and Gerard J. Tellis (1998) ,'Removing Social Desirability Bias With Indirect Questioning: Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease?', in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 25, eds. Joseph W. Alba & J. Wesley Hutchinson, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 563-567. SAMHSA(2017, August 10). Recovery and Recovery Support [Web blog message]. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/recovery Scott, C. K., Foss, M. A., & Dennis, M. L. (2005). Pathways in the relapse--treatment--recovery cycle over 3 years. J Subst Abuse Treat, 28 Suppl 1, S63-72. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2004.09.006 Seppala, M. D., & Rose, M. E. (2010). Prescription painkillers: History, pharmacology, and treatment. Center City: MN: Hazelden. Skogens L, von Greiff N. 2014. Recovery capital in the process of change-differences and similarities between groups of clients treated for alcohol or drug problems. Eur J Social Work. 17:58–73. Sobell, L. C., Cunningham, J. A., & Sobell, M. B. (1996). Recovery from alcohol problems with and without treatment: prevalence in two population surveys. American Journal of Public Health, 86(7), 966–972. Sobell, L., Ellingstad, T. P., & Sobell, M. B. (2000). Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: methodological review of the research with suggestions for future directions. Addiction, 95(5), 749-764. South, N. (1999). Drugs: Cultures, controls, and everyday life. London: England: Sage. Tew, J. (2013). Recovery capital: what enables a sustainable recovery from mental health difficulties? European Journal of Social Work, 16(3), 360-374. doi:10.1080/13691457.2012.687713 The National Academics Press. (2016). Ending Discrimination Against People with Mental and Substance Use Disorders: The Evidence for Stigma Change. (9780309439121-0309439124). Washington (DC) Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631043. UK Drug Policy Commission. (2008). The UK Drug Policy Commission Recovery Consensus Group. London: Kings Place. van Melick, M., McCartney, D., & Best, D. (2013). Ongoing recovery support and peer networks: a preliminary investigation of recovery champions and their peers. Journal Group Addict Recov(8), 85-99. Vilsaint, C. L., Kelly, J. F., Bergman, B. G., Groshkova, T., Best, D., & White, W. (2017). Development and validation of a Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10) for alcohol and drug use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend, 177, 71-76. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.03.022 Wand, T. (2015). Recovery is about a focus on resilience and wellness, not a fixation with risk and illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 49(12), 1083-1084. doi:10.1177/0004867415614107 Weiss, R. D. (1992). The role of psychopathology in the transition from drug use to abuse and dependence. Vulnerability to drug abuse, 137-148. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10107-006 White, W. (2007). Addiction recovery: its definition and conceptual boundaries. . Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 229-241. White, W., & Cloud, W. (2008). Recovery capital: A primer for addictions professionals. Counselor, 9(5), 22-27. White, W., & Kurtz, E. (2006). The Varieties of Recovery Experience: A Primer for Addiction Treatment Professionals and Recovery Advocates. White, W. L. (2000). Toward a New Recovery Movement: Historical Reflections on Recovery, Treatment and Advocacy. Recovery Community Support Program Conference, “Working Together for Recovery”. Wills, T. A., McNamara, G., Vaccaro, D., & Hirky, A. E. . (1996). Escalated substance use: A longitudinal grouping analysis from early to middle adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105(2), 166-180. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.105.2.166 Yates R. (2013). In it for the long haul: developing recovery capital for long-term recovery sustainment. Journal of Substance Use, 18(339). Yates, R. (2014). Recovery Capital, Addiction Theory, and the Development of Recovery Communities. The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 1(2), 96-112. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71999 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 「戒癮」雖一直是最常見的復元定義,然近年已有不少研究指出僅專注於復發預防雖有助這群人免於反覆落入成癮循環,但戒癮失敗象徵的健康失利、刑罰與道德批判,往往容易使這群人合理化不求助正規醫療與服務系統,以致疾病惡化與增加死亡率。因此,有不少成癮臨床專家與政策呼籲應重新定義對酒精及物質使用者的復元定義與目標,且應將象徵復元的元素定義為「清醒、健康與福祉及公民權的行使」。有鑑於此,本研究目的便是想探索影響著毒品/藥物使用者復元的重要因素,並提出兩點如下:(一)檢視影響毒品/藥物使用者復元的因素:使用者的性別、年齡、健康狀態、社經地位、復元障礙、復元資本與復元的關係;(二)探討毒品/藥物使用者的復元資本,是否有助於緩衝復元障礙對復元的影響。
本研究採用量化典範,以立意抽樣與結構式問卷進行資料蒐集,為確保資料的品質,研究先採用G*Power計算樣本的考驗力,並通過臺大研究倫理中心之倫理審查。而後,透過7個單位與多位網路社群守門人的協助,共蒐集到197份實體問卷及221份網路問卷,最後納入有效問卷388份進行統計分析;在各量表利用Amos進行驗證性因素分析,均達到可接受的信度水準後,再透過SPSS進行研究假設之檢定。 研究分析顯示,透過t檢定、單因子變異數分析(ANOVA)、皮爾遜績差相關等統計檢定,可知居住型態、教育程度、工作狀況、每月收入、維持清醒自評、同住人數等基本人口變項,與復元資本、復元障礙、復元等變項有顯著相關;年齡、監禁經驗、身心適應不良等具有負向資本屬性之人口變項,與復元資本、復元障礙、復元等變項有顯著相關。透過多元迴歸透過階層迴歸(hierarchical regression),檢測不同復元障礙變項對不同復元變項的影響,經使用統計控制下,結果顯示:(一)象徵復元障礙的污名與創傷經驗,會降低毒品/藥物使用者的生活品質,但污名與創傷經驗與維持清醒承諾的關係則不成立;(二)毒品/藥物使用者的復元資本越高者,生活品質與維持清醒承諾則越高;(三)加入復元障礙與復元資本的調節作用項後,可知在生活品質的部分,復元資本並無對污名與創傷經驗在生活品質上有緩衝的作用,且此三個變項對生活品質具有獨立的解釋力;在維持清醒承諾的部分,復元資本並無對創傷經驗在維持清醒承諾上有緩衝的作用,但對污名與維持清醒承諾上則具有顯著的調節作用,且進一步繪製污名與復元資本交互作用圖及單純斜率檢定後,發現復元資本可作為污名程度較低阻時,提升其清醒承諾的重要調節因子。 最後,主要研究結論為:(一)同一組復元障礙因子(創傷經驗與污名)對同一組象徵復元的因子(生活品質與維持清醒承諾),會產生不同的關係及解釋結果,顯示出復元有多元的樣貌,因此對毒品/藥物使用者在復元狀態的測量上,應運用多元的測量指標而非單一定義;(二)正向復元資本不僅與復元呈現正向關係,且亦可作為緩衝復元障礙對復元復元的重要調節因子;(三)進行對毒品/藥物使用者的問卷資料調查時,應考量到社會期待與資料蒐集來源對資料可信度的影響,在提供給受訪者較隱匿的回應管道,將有助於資料可信度的提升。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | There are many addictive clinical experts and policy appeals that should redefine the definition and goals of the recovery of alcohol and substance users and as 'awake, health and well-being and the exercise of citizenship.' According to this definition, the purpose of this study is: (1) to understand the effect of drug users in recovering such as their gender, age, health status, social status, relationship, recovery capital, and recovery; (2) to exploring the impact of recovery capital to barriers and recovery of drug users.
This is the quantitative study and with IRB approval by Reserch Ethics Office of National University. The researcher collect 197 questionnaires through 7 units and 221 questionnaires online. Finally, 388 valid questionnaires were included. Three main results as below: (1) the stigma and trauma would reduce the quality of life of drug users, but be unrelated to sobriety; (2) the higher of the recovery capital of drug users, the higher quality of life and sobriety of them; (3) recovery capital would moderator stigma and sobriety significantly, and according to the interaction diagram and simple slope analysis, the study had found recovery capital could increase sobriety of drug users, when they had lower stigma. Conclusions: (1) trauma and stigma have different affect to quality of life and sobriety, it shows recovery presents diversity phenomenon and relationship between different barriers to recovery. It shows multiple recovery element should be measure and explore instead of a single definition of recovery; (2) positive recovery capital shows not only the positive relationship to recovery (including of QOL and sobriety), but also moderator the impact to stigma and sobriety significantly; (3) the impact of social expectations and data collection should be considered, and offer a safer way to drug users might improve the credibility of the data. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:18:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-D99330002-1.pdf: 6097000 bytes, checksum: 2020e528dda15f2e5ebccf4627925186 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與研究範圍 8 第三節 研究目的 12 第四節 名詞解釋 13 第二章 文獻探討 14 第一節 傳統的成癮復元觀點 14 第二節 復元的定義與內涵 20 第三節 毒品/藥物使用者的復元障礙 35 第四節 復元資本與復元 44 第三章 研究方法 56 第一節 研究典範與選取考量 56 第二節 研究假設與架構 58 第三節 變項的操作性定義與測量 60 第四節 研究對象與抽樣方法 72 第五節 研究倫理 74 第六節 資料蒐集 75 第七節 資料分析方法 79 第八節 測量工具的信效度分析 83 第四章 研究分析與發現 86 第一節 人口變項基本資料描述 86 第二節 復元、障礙與復元資本之雙變項關係 101 第三節 復元障礙、復元資本與復元之多元迴歸分析 117 第五章 結論與建議 129 第一節 研究結論 129 第二節 研究發現 134 第三節 結論 141 第四節 研究限制 143 參考文獻 145 附件 159 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 尋找復元的可能-毒品使用者復元資本、復元障礙與復元關係之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Pathway of recovery - An Exploration on the Relationship between Recovery Capital, Barries and Recovery of Drug Users | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳杏容,陳毓文,吳慧菁(hchingwu@ntu.edu.tw),張?文 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 污名,創傷經驗,復元資本,生活品質,清醒,毒品/藥物使用, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | stigma,trauma,recovery capital,QOL,soberity,durg use, | en |
dc.relation.page | 187 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803992 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
Appears in Collections: | 社會工作學系 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf Restricted Access | 5.95 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.