請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71546完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 薛漪平(I-Ping Hsueh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yang-Yang Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡揚揚 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:02:56Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-05 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-03-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-01-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 林雅惠. (2018). 全人工關節置換手術病人共享決策及相關因素初探. 高雄醫學大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2018年)
蔡甫昌, & 郭蕙心. (2017). 病人自主權利法之倫理觀點與實務挑戰. 台灣醫學, 21(1), 62-72. 蔡宜蓉, & 褚增輝. (2014). 國內外職能治療師的現況與未來發展趨勢. 醫療品質雜誌, 8(2), 18-22. Afhami, N., Bahadoran, P., Taleghani, H. R., & Nekuei, N. (2016). The knowledge and attitudes of midwives regarding legal and religious commandments on induced abortion and their relationship with some demographic characteristics. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 21(2), 177-182. Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Albrecht, K. J., Nashan, D., Meiss, F., Bengel, J., & Reuter, K. (2014). Shared decision making in dermato-oncology: preference for involvement of melanoma patients. Melanoma Research, 24(1), 68-74. Alden, D. L., Friend, J., & Chun, M. B. (2013). Shared decision making and patient decision aids: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Hawai'i physicians. Hawaii Journal of Medicine & Public Health, 72(11), 396-400. Atwal, A., Money, A., & Harvey, M. (2014). Occupational therapists' views on using a virtual reality interior design application within the pre-discharge home visit process. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), e283. Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780-781. Beers, E., Lee Nilsen, M., & Johnson, J. T. (2017). The Role of Patients: Shared Decision-Making. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 50(4), 689-708. Blanc, X., Collet, T. H., Auer, R., Fischer, R., Locatelli, I., Iriarte, P., . . . Cornuz, J. (2014). Publication trends of shared decision making in 15 high impact medical journals: a full-text review with bibliometric analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14, 71. Brinkman, W. B., Hartl, J., Rawe, L. M., Sucharew, H., Britto, M. T., & Epstein, J. N. (2011). Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder care. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 165(11), 1013-1019. Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P. A., & Rubin, H. R. (1999). Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(15), 1458-1465. Caldwell, J. G. (2008). Evaluating attitudes of first-year residents to shared decision making. Medical Education Online, 13, 10. Chang, L. (1994). A psychometric evaluation of 4-point and 6-point Likert-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3), 205-215. Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science and Medicine, 44(5), 681-692. Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1999). Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science and Medicine, 49(5), 651-661. Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6 points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399-403. Chong, W. W., Aslani, P., & Chen, T. F. (2013). Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(5), 373-379. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Copley, J., Turpin, M., Brosnan, J., & Nelson, A. (2008). Understanding and negotiating: reasoning processes used by an occupational therapist to individualize intervention decisions for people with upper limb hypertonicity. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(19), 1486-1498. Coutu, M. F., Legare, F., Durand, M. J., Corbiere, M., Stacey, D., Bainbridge, L., & Labrecque, M. E. (2015). Operationalizing a shared decision making model for work rehabilitation programs: a consensus process. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 25(1), 141-152. Coutu, M. F., Legare, F., Durand, M. J., Corbiere, M., Stacey, D., Loisel, P., & Bainbridge, L. (2011). Fostering shared decision making by occupational therapists and workers involved in accidents resulting in persistent musculoskeletal disorders: a study protocol. Implementation Science, 6, 22. Coutu, M. F., Legare, F., Stacey, D., Durand, M. J., Corbiere, M., Bainbridge, L., & Labrecque, M. E. (2015). Occupational therapists' shared decision-making behaviors with patients having persistent pain in a work rehabilitation context: A cross-sectional study. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(7), 864-870. Cushing, A., & Metcalfe, R. (2007). Optimizing medicines management: From compliance to concordance. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 3(6), 1047-1058. Davis, K., Haisfield, L., Dorfman, C., Krist, A., & Taylor, K. L. (2011). Physicians' attitudes about shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Family Medicine, 43(4), 260-266. Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International journal of market research, 50(1), 61-104. De las Cuevas, C., & Penate, W. (2014). To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 26(6), 372-381. Degner, L. F., Sloan, J. A., & Venkatesh, P. (1997). The Control Preferences Scale. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 29(3), 21-43. Delany, C., & Galvin, J. (2011). Shared decision making and ethics in paediatric occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58, 22-22. Delany, C., & Galvin, J. (2014). Ethics and shared decision-making in paediatric occupational therapy practice. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17(5), 347-354. Dierckx, K., Deveugele, M., Roosen, P., & Devisch, I. (2013). Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Physical Therapy: Observed Level of Involvement and Patient Preference. Physical Therapy, 93(10), 1321-1330. Donkers, H. W., van der Veen, D. J., Vernooij-Dassen, M. J., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W., & Graff, M. J. (2017). Social participation of people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: a feasibility evaluation of the Social Fitness Programme. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 32(12). Doyle, S. D., & Bennett, S. (2014). Feasibility and effect of a professional education workshop for occupational therapists' management of upper-limb poststroke sensory impairment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(3), e74-83. Durand, M. A., Yen, R., Barr, P. J., Cochran, N., Aarts, J., Legare, F., . . . Elwyn, G. (2017). Assessing medical student knowledge and attitudes about shared decision making across the curriculum: protocol for an international online survey and stakeholder analysis. BMJ Open, 7(6), e015945. Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Kinnersley, P., & Grol, R. (2000). Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. British Journal of General Practice, 50(460), 892-899. Elwyn, G., Frosch, D. L., & Kobrin, S. (2015). Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implementation Science, 11, 114. Emanuel, E. J., & Dubler, N. N. (1995). Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(4), 323-329. Falardeau, M., & Durand, M. J. (2002). Negotiation-centred versus client-centred: which approach should be used? Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(3), 135-142. Fouche, C., Kenealy, T., Mace, J., & Shaw, J. (2014). Practitioner perspectives from seven health professional groups on core competencies in the context of chronic care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(6), 534-540. Frosch, D. L., & Kaplan, R. M. (1999). Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 17(4), 285-294. Gärtner, F. R., Bomhof-Roordink, H., Smith, I. P., Scholl, I., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Pieterse, A. H. (2018). The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review. PloS One, 13(2), e0191747. Goossensen, A., Zijlstra, P., & Koopmanschap, M. (2007). Measuring shared decision making processes in psychiatry: skills versus patient satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling, 67(1-2), 50-56. Gravel, K., Légaré, F., & Graham, I. D. (2006). Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implementation Science, 1, 16-16. Griffin, J., McKenna, K., & Tooth, L. (2003). Written health education materials: making them more effective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 50(3), 170-177. Hansen , A., Boll, M., Minet, L., Søgaard, K., & Kristensen, H. (2017). Novel occupational therapy intervention in the early rehabilitation of patients with brain tumours. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 80(10), 603-607. Hansen, A. O., Kristensen, H. K., Cederlund, R., Lauridsen, H. H., & Tromborg, H. (2017). Client-centred practice from the perspective of Danish patients with hand-related disorders. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1-11. Harter, M., Moumjid, N., Cornuz, J., Elwyn, G., & van der Weijden, T. (2017). Shared decision making in 2017: International accomplishments in policy, research and implementation. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 123, 1-5. Hoffmann, T. C., Bennett, S., Tomsett, C., & Del Mar, C. (2014). Brief training of student clinicians in shared decision making: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29(6), 844-849. Hoffmann, T. C., & Glasziou, P. (2016). Bringing shared decision making and evidence-based practice together. In G. Elwyn, A. Edwards, & R. Thompson (Eds.), Shared Decision Making in Health Care (3 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hoffmann, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(13), 1295-1296. Hong, P., Maguire, E., Gorodzinsky, A. Y., Curran, J. A., Ritchie, K., & Chorney, J. (2016). Shared decision-making in pediatric otolaryngology: Parent, physician and observational perspectives. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 87, 39-43. Joseph-Williams, N., Elwyn, G., & Edwards, A. (2014). Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, 94(3), 291-309. Kanzaria, H. K., Brook, R. H., Probst, M. A., Harris, D., Berry, S. H., & Hoffman, J. R. (2015). Emergency physician perceptions of shared decision-making. Academic Emergency Medicine, 22(4), 399-405. Kasper, J., Heesen, C., Köpke, S., Fulcher, G., & Geiger, F. (2011). Patients' and Observers' Perceptions of Involvement Differ. Validation Study on Inter-Relating Measures for Shared Decision Making. PloS One, 6(10), e26255. Kassam, R., Albon, S. P., Bainbridge, L., Suto, M., & Collins, J. B. (2006). Learning by doing: enhancing interprofessional students' awareness of informed shared decision-making. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences & Practice, 4(4), 1-11. King, V. J., Davis, M. M., Gorman, P. N., Rugge, J. B., & Fagnan, L. J. (2012). Perceptions of shared decision making and decision aids among rural primary care clinicians. Medical Decision Making, 32(4), 636-644. Kriston, L., Scholl, I., Holzel, L., Simon, D., Loh, A., & Harter, M. (2010). The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Education and Counseling, 80(1), 94-99. Légaré, F., Adekpedjou, R., Stacey, D., Turcotte, S., Kryworuchko, J., Graham, I. D., . . . et al. (2018). Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(7). Legare, F., Ratte, S., Gravel, K., & Graham, I. D. (2008). Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(3), 526-535. Legare, F., Stacey, D., Forest, P. G., Coutu, M. F., Archambault, P., Boland, L., . . . Giguere, A. M. C. (2017). Milestones, barriers and beacons: Shared decision making in Canada inches ahead. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 123-124, 23-27. Liao, H. H., Liang, H. W., Chen, H. C., Chang, C. I., Wang, P. C., & Shih, C. L. (2017). Shared decision making in Taiwan. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 123, 95-98. Maitra, K. K., & Erway, F. (2006). Perception of client-centered practice in occupational therapists and their clients. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(3), 298-310. Makoul, G., & Clayman, M. L. (2006). An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 60(3), 301-312. McAnuff, J., Boyes, C., & Kolehmainen, N. (2015). Family-clinician interactions in children's health services: a secondary analysis of occupational therapists' practice descriptions. Health Expectations, 18(6), 2236-2251. McCaffery, K., Irwig, L., & Bossuyt, P. (2007). Patient decision aids to support clinical decision making: evaluating the decision or the outcomes of the decision. Medical Decision Making, 27(5), 619-625. McCluskey, A., & O'Connor, D. (2017). Implementing evidence: closing research-practice gaps. In T. Hoffmann, S. Bennett, & C. Del Mar (Eds.), Evidence-Based Practice Across the Health Professions (3 ed., pp. 384-408). Australia: Elsevier. Moats, G., & Doble, S. (2006). Discharge planning with older adults: toward a negotiated model of decision making. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(5), 303-311. Money, A. G., Atwal, A., Young, K. L., Day, Y., Wilson, L., & Money, K. G. (2015). Using the Technology Acceptance Model to explore community dwelling older adults' perceptions of a 3D interior design application to facilitate pre-discharge home adaptations. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15, 73. Montori, V. M., Brito, J., & Murad, M. (2013). The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: Incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(23), 2503-2504. Muller-Engelmann, M., Donner-Banzhoff, N., Keller, H., Rosinger, L., Sauer, C., Rehfeldt, K., & Krones, T. (2013). When decisions should be shared: a study of social norms in medical decision making using a factorial survey approach. Medical Decision Making, 33(1), 37-47. Nagayama, H., Tomori, K., Ohno, K., Takahashi, K., Ogahara, K., Sawada, T., . . . Yamauchi, K. (2016). Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Occupation-Based Occupational Therapy Using the Aid for Decision Making in Occupation Choice (ADOC) for Older Residents: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. PloS One, 11(3), e0150374. Padilla-Garrido, N., Aguado-Correa, F., Ortega-Moreno, M., Bayo-Calero, J., & Bayo-Lozano, E. (2017). [Shared decision making from the perspective of the cancer patient: participatory roles and evaluation of the process]. An Sist Sanit Navar, 40(1), 25-33. Pieterse, A., Baas-Thijssen, M., Marijnen, C., & Stiggelbout, A. (2008). Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration. British Journal of Cancer, 99(6), 875. Pollard, S., Bansback, N., & Bryan, S. (2015). Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(9), 1046-1057. Rodenburg-Vandenbussche, S., Pieterse, A. H., Kroonenberg, P. M., Scholl, I., van der Weijden, T., Luyten, G. P., . . . Stiggelbout, A. M. (2015). Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care. PloS One, 10(7), e0132158. Sabaté, E. (2003). Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action: World Health Organization. Scholl, I., Koelewijn-van Loon, M., Sepucha, K., Elwyn, G., Legare, F., Harter, M., & Dirmaier, J. (2011). Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 105(4), 313-324. Scholl, I., Kriston, L., Dirmaier, J., Buchholz, A., & Harter, M. (2012). Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire--physician version (SDM-Q-Doc). Patient Education and Counseling, 88(2), 284-290. Scholl, I., Kriston, L., Dirmaier, J., & Harter, M. (2015). Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity. Health Expectations, 18(1), 137-150. Sepucha, K. R., & Scholl, I. (2014). Measuring shared decision making: a review of constructs, measures, and opportunities for cardiovascular care. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 7(4), 620-626. Shay, L. A., & Lafata, J. E. (2015). Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Medical Decision Making, 35(1), 114-131. Shen, H. N., Lin, C. C., Hoffmann, T., Tsai, C. Y., Hou, W. H., & Kuo, K. N. (2018). The relationship between health literacy and perceived shared decision making in patients with breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling. Silverman, F. (2007). A study of occupational therapy service negotiations in educational settings. Arcadia University. Silverman, F., Kramer, P., & Ravitch, S. (2011). A systems approach to understanding occupational therapy service negotiations in a preschool setting. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 31(1), 31-43. Simon, D., Schorr, G., Wirtz, M., Vodermaier, A., Caspari, C., Neuner, B., . . . Harter, M. (2006). Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q). Patient Education and Counseling, 63(3), 319-327. Stalmeier, P. F. (2011). Adherence and decision AIDS: a model and a narrative review. Medical Decision Making, 31(1), 121-129. Sumsion, T., & Smyth, G. (2000). Barriers to client-centredness and their resolution. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(1), 15-21. Tam-Seto, L., & Versnel, J. (2015). Occupational Therapy Shared Decision Making in Adolescent Mental Health. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 31(2), 168-186. Tomori, K., Nagayama, H., Saito, Y., Ohno, K., Nagatani, R., & Higashi, T. (2015). Examination of a cut-off score to express the meaningful activity of people with dementia using iPad application (ADOC). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10(2), 126-131. Tomori, K., Uezu, S., Kinjo, S., Ogahara, K., Nagatani, R., & Higashi, T. (2012). Utilization of the iPad application: Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice. Occupational Therapy International, 19(2), 88-97. Topp, J., Westenhofer, J., Scholl, I., & Hahlweg, P. (2018). Shared decision-making in physical therapy: A cross-sectional study on physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(2), 346-351. Towle, A., & Godolphin, W. (1999). Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. British Medical Journal, 319(7212), 766-771. van Til, J. A., Drossaert, C. H., Punter, R. A., & Ijzerman, M. J. (2010). The potential for shared decision-making and decision aids in rehabilitation medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42(6), 598-604. Villeneuve, M. A., & Shulha, L. M. (2012). Learning together for effective collaboration in school-based occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(5), 293-302. Whitney, S. N., McGuire, A. L., & McCullough, L. B. (2004). A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140(1), 54-59. Woltz, S., Krijnen, P., Meylaerts, S. A. G., Pieterse, A. H., & Schipper, I. B. (2017). Shared decision making in the management of midshaft clavicular fractures: Nonoperative treatment or plate fixation. Injury, 48(4), 920-924. Woltz, S., Krijnen, P., Pieterse, A. H., & Schipper, I. B. (2018). Surgeons' perspective on shared decision making in trauma surgery. A national survey. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(10), 1748-1752. Yao, M., Finnikin, S., & Cheng, K. K. (2017). Call for Shared Decision Making in China: Challenges and Opportunities. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 123, 32-35. Zhang, Y., Su, H., Shang, L., Li, D., Wang, R., Zhang, R., & Xu, Y. (2011). Preferences and Perceived Involvement in Treatment Decision Making among Chinese Patients with Chronic Hepatitis. Medical Decision Making, 31(2), 245-253. Zolnierek, K. B., & Dimatteo, M. R. (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Medical Care, 47(8), 826-834. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71546 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 研究背景:共享決策 (shared decision-making, SDM) 係一種重視個案與醫療人員合力參與決策過程的醫療決策模式。SDM對醫療人員或職能治療師 (occupational therapist, OTs) 的價值在於SDM符合現代醫療的主流價值 (以病人為中心與實證醫學)、尊重個案參與醫療決策的權利,並且可改善醫病關係與治療遵從度。先前研究已顯示醫療人員的知識程度可能影響其態度與行為,然此三者之關聯性目前並無明確定論。雖然現今臺灣醫療界已開始推廣SDM並致力於將SDM應用於日常醫療實務中,但臺灣醫療人員的SDM行為現況與其前導因子 (知識與態度) 的實證研究仍相當缺乏 (包含臺灣OTs)。瞭解臺灣OTs的SDM行為概況及前導因子應有利於改善臺灣OTs的SDM行為。然而,臺灣OTs的SDM行為概況及前導因子皆未知以致於不利改善臺灣OTs的SDM行為,故調查臺灣OTs的SDM行為概況及前導因子應具研究需求與價值。
研究目的:本研究目的共有二項:1.調查臺灣OTs的SDM知識、態度及行為概況;2.檢驗臺灣OTs的SDM知識、態度及行為之關聯性。 研究方法:本研究採用橫斷式研究 (cross-sectional study) 及方便取樣 (convenience sampling) 之研究設計,並以網路問卷調查臺灣OTs對SDM的知識、態度及行為。知識層面評量是否知道SDM及自覺對SDM的熟悉程度。態度層面評量8項態度因子,即:決策角色偏好、概念認同性、個案不適用性、臨床適用性、臨床不實用性、預期結果、自我效能以及採用動機,其中決策角色偏好以控制偏好量表 (Control Preferences Scale, CPS) 評量,而其他7項SDM態度因子則根據其他學者之研究成果彙整相關評估項目來評量。行為層面評量決策採用模式及SDM執行程度,其中決策採用模式以改良版控制偏好量表 (modified version of Control Preferences Scale, CPSpost) 調查,而SDM執行程度以醫療人員版共享決策問卷 (Shared decision-making Questionnaire-physician version, SDM-Q-Doc) 評量。 研究結果:在SDM行為方面,198位臺灣OTs中約為46.0%採用SDM,而SDM-Q-Doc的指數平均為71.9分。在SDM態度方面,臺灣OTs中約有70.7%偏好採用SDM,約有97%認同SDM概念,約有32.4%認為SDM不適用於多數個案/家屬,約有86.9%認同SDM適用於OT臨床工作情境,約有21.7%認為SDM缺乏臨床實用性,約有69.7%預期SDM具備正向成果效益,約有89.9%具備執行SDM的自我效能,約有83.3%具備學習並採用SDM的意願/動機。在SDM知識方面,臺灣OTs約有65.2%聽過SDM,而整體SDM熟悉程度約為4.2分。在關聯性方面,決策採用模式與其決策角色偏好為中度相關(σ=0.36),與其他7項SDM態度因子為低度相關(σ=-0.16-0.24)。SDM執行程度與概念認同性(σ=0.58)、臨床適用性(σ=0.50)、自我效能(σ=0.67)、臨床不實用性(σ=-0.49)、結果預期性(σ=0.30)及採用意願/動機(σ=0.48)為高度或中度相關,而與個案不適用性(σ=-0.15)及決策角色偏(σ=0.03)則為低度相關或無相關。是否聽過SDM與採用動機為低相關(σ=-0.13),而與其他7項SDM態度因子(σ=-0.06-0.03)及與決策採用模式(σ=-0.01)及SDM執行程度(0.00)則為無相關。SDM熟悉程度與自我效能(σ=0.15)、採用動機(σ=-0.11)、決策採用模式(σ=0.12)及SDM執行程度(σ=0.12)為低度相關,而與其他6項SDM態度因子則為無相關 (σ=-0.09-0.07)。 研究總結:臺灣OTs的SDM採用比例接近5成,整體SDM執行程度約為中度,對SDM態度多數為正向態度,6成以上聽過SDM,而整體SDM熟悉程度約中度偏低。在關聯性方面,SDM行為與SDM態度為低度到高度相關,而SDM知識與SDM態度及SDM行為則為低相關或無相關。本研究應有助於臨床及研究人員瞭解臺灣OTs的SDM知識、態度與行為之現況以及影響其SDM知識、態度與行為之關鍵因子,且應可作為未來臨床教學與SDM推廣之實證依據。由於本研究仍有些許不足之處,因此,建議未來以本研究的相關不足之處為基礎來繼續釐清SDM相關議題。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is one kind of medical decision-making model that emphasizes the cooperation between clients and clinicians during the medical decision-making process. Although Taiwanese medical society has tried to promote SDM and to integrate SDM into clinical practice, the evidence-based research on the status of SDM behavior and its antecedents (knowledge and attitudes) of Taiwanese medical personnel is still quite lacking (including Taiwanese OTs). Understanding the SDM behavior and its antecedents of Taiwanese OTs should help improve the SDM behavior of Taiwanese OTs. However, the status of SDM behavior and its antecedents of Taiwanese OTs are unknown, which is unfavorable to improve the SDM behavior of Taiwanese OTs. Therefore, the survey of SDM behavior and its antecedents of Taiwanese OTs should have research needs and values.
Purpose: There are two aims of this proposal. First, to overview Taiwanese OTs’ knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of SDM. Second, to recognize the correlations between Taiwanese OTs’ knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of SDM. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using a convenience sampling design. This study surveys Taiwanese OTs about their knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of SDM by using the selfmade online questionnaire. The knowledge domain includes whether OTs know about SDM and the level of familiarity of SDM. The attitudes domain includes 8 factors, such as preferred role in decision-making, SDM concept agreement, clients’ inapplicability, clinical applicability, clinical impracticality, expected outcome, self-efficacy to implement SDM, and motivation to use SDM. Thereinto, this study use the Control Preferences Scale (CPS) to investigate Taiwanese OTs’ preferred role in decision-making, and use the questionnaire based on other scholars’ study to evaluate the other seven attitude factors. The behavior domain includes the utilization of decision-making model and the degree of SDM behavior. The utilization of decision-making model is investigated by modified version of Control Preferences Scale (CPSpost), and the degree of SDM behavior is surveyed by the Shared Decision-making Questionnaire-physician version (SDM-Q-Doc). Results: There are 198 Taiwanese OTs in this study samples. The proportion of utilizing SDM is about 46.0%, and the general degree of SDM behavior was 71.9. The proportion of preferring SDM is about 70.7%. The proportion of agreement with SDM concept is about 97%. The proportion of agreement with client’s applicability of SDM is about 67.6%. The proportion of agreement with clinical applicability of SDM is about 86.9%. The proportion of agreement with clinical practicality of SDM is about 78.3%. The proportion of positive expectation of SDM results is about 69.7%. The proportion of who has self-efficacy to implement SDM is about 89.9%. The proportion of who has motivation to learn/ adopt SDM is about 83.3%. The proportion of who have heard of SDM is about 65.2%, and the general level of SDM familiarity is about 4.2. With regards to the correlations, there is a moderate correlation between utilization of decision-making model and preference of decision-making role (σ=0.36), and there are low correlation between utilization of decision-making model and the other 7 attitude factors (σ=-0.16-0.24). The degree of SDM behavior are highly or moderately correlated with concept agreement (σ=0.58), clinical applicability (σ=0.50), self-efficacy (σ=0.67), clinical impracticality (σ=-0.49), expected outcome (σ=0.30) and motivation (σ=0.48), and are lowly or not correlated with clients’ inapplicability (σ=-0.15) and preference of decision-making role (σ=0.03). Whether OTs know about SDM is lowly correlated with motivation (σ=-0.13), and are not correlated with the other 7 attititude fators (σ=-0.06-0.03), utilization of decision-making model (σ=-0.01) and the degree of SDM behavior (σ=0.00). The level of familiarity of SDM are lowly correlated with self-efficacy (σ=0.15), motivation (σ=-0.11), utilization of decision-making model (σ=0.12) and the degree of SDM behavior (σ=0.12), and are not correlated with the other 6 attitude factors (σ=-0.09-0.07). Conclusion: The proportion of utilizing SDM in Taiwanese OTs is close to 50%. The general degree of SDM behabior is moderate. The general attitudes toward SDM are mostly positive. More than 60% of Taiwanese OTs has heard of SDM, and the general level of SDM familiarity is moderately low. With regards to the correlations, SDM behavior are lowly to highly correlated with SDM attitudes. SDM knowledge are lowly or not correlated with SDM attitudes and SDM behavior. This study investigates the SDM knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Taiwanese OTs and examines the relevance of SDM knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. It should help clinical and researchers understand the current state of SDM knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Taiwanese OTs and the key factors impact on SDM knowledge, attitudes and behavior. This study should be used as the empirical basis for future clinical teaching and SDM promotion. As there are still some limitations in this study, it is recommended continuing to investigate the relevant SDM-related issues based on the shortcomings of this study. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:02:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05429004-1.pdf: 1956708 bytes, checksum: ff6382901f062ce760825f13c766a12a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
致謝 II 摘要 III Abstract V 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XI 第一章、共享決策之簡介 1 第一節、共享決策之概念說明 1 一、共享決策之概念模型 1 二、共享決策之程序模型 1 第二節、共享決策之概念由來 2 一、父權決策模式 2 二、告知決策模式 2 三、共享決策模式 3 第三節、共享決策之應用價值 3 一、符合現代醫學的主流理念 3 二、符合個案的權利與需求 4 三、符合醫療實務的需求 4 第二章、醫療人員的共享決策行為與影響因素 5 第一節、共享決策於國際醫療領域的應用概況 5 第二節、國際醫療人員的共享決策行為概況 6 一、決策採用模式 6 二、共享決策執行程度 6 第三節、臺灣醫療人員的共享決策行為現況 9 第四節、影響醫療人員共享決策行為的前導因子─知識與態度 9 一、共享決策知識層面 10 二、共享決策態度層面 11 三、小結 16 第三章、職能治療師的共享決策行為與影響因素 17 第一節、共享決策於國際職能治療的應用概況 17 第二節、國際職能治療師的共享決策行為及前導因子 18 一、國際職能治療師的共享決策行為現況 18 二、影響職能治療師共享決策行為的前導因子 18 第三節、臺灣職能治療師的共享決策行為及前導因子 20 第四節、小結 20 第四章、研究目的與研究假說 21 第一節、研究目的 21 第二節、研究假說 21 第五章、研究方法 23 第一節、研究對象 23 第二節、研究流程 23 第三節、研究工具 26 第四節、資料分析 33 第六章、研究結果 34 第一節、研究對象的人口學特徵 34 第二節、臺灣職能治療師的共享決策知識、態度及行為概況 35 一、職能治療師的共享決策行為概況 35 二、職能治療師的共享決策態度概況 36 三、職能治療師的共享決策知識概況 40 第三節 臺灣職能治療師的共享決策知識、態度及行為之關聯性 41 一、職能治療師的共享決策行為與態度之關聯性 41 二、職能治療師的共享決策知識與態度之關聯性 42 三、職能治療師的共享決策知識與行為之關聯性 43 第七章 結果討論 44 第一節 臺灣職能治療師的共享決策知識、態度及行為概況 44 一、職能治療師的共享決策行為概況 44 二、職能治療師的共享決策態度概況 46 三、職能治療師的共享決策知識概況 50 四、小結 51 第二節 臺灣職能治療師的共享決策知識、態度及行為之關聯性 52 一、職能治療師的共享決策行為與態度之關聯性 52 二、職能治療師的共享決策態度與知識之關聯性 53 三、職能治療師的共享決策知識與行為之關聯性 54 第三節 研究限制 55 第四節 未來研究建議 57 第五節 結論 58 參考文獻 59 附錄一、研究問卷 91 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 職能治療師 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共享決策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 知識 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 態度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | shared decision-making | en |
| dc.subject | occupational therapist | en |
| dc.subject | knowledge | en |
| dc.subject | behavior | en |
| dc.subject | attitudes | en |
| dc.title | 臺灣職能治療師的共享決策知識、態度與行為之初探 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Taiwanese Occupational Therapists’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior of Shared Decision-Making: A Preliminary Study | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張彧(Yuh Jang),黃小玲(Xiao-Ling Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 職能治療師,共享決策,知識,態度,行為, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | occupational therapist,shared decision-making,knowledge,attitudes,behavior, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 97 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900245 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-01-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 職能治療學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.91 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
