Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 財務金融學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71539
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor何耕宇(Keng-Yu Ho)
dc.contributor.authorXin-Yi Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳心怡zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T06:02:47Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-30
dc.date.copyright2019-01-30
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-01-29
dc.identifier.citation1. Aerts, W., Cormier, D. and Magnan, M., 2006. Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: An international perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 25 (3): 299-331.
2. Anderson, J.C. and Frankle, A.W., 1980. Voluntary social reporting: An iso-bata portfolio analysis. The Accounting Review, vol. 55 (3): 467-479.
3. Abbott, W.F. and Monsen, R.J., 1979. On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 22 (3): 501-515.
4. Bowen, H.R., 1953. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.
5. Bizjak, J.M., Lemmon, M. and Naveen, L., 2008. Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation? Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 90 (2): 152-168.
6. Bragdon, J. and Marlin, J., 1972. Is pollution profitable? Risk Management, vol. 19: 9-18.
7. Bertels, S. and Peloza, J., 2008. Running just to stand still? Managing CSR reputation in an era of ratcheting expectations. Corporate Reputation Review, vol. 11 (1): 56-72.
8. Carroll, A.B., 1999. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, vol. 38 (3): 268-295.
9. Carroll, A.B. and Buchholtz, A., 2003. Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cengage Learning, Stamford.
10. Davis, K., 1975. Five propositions for social responsibility. Business Horizons, vol. 18 (3): 19-24.
11. David, Alexandre, Enrico and Emmanuel, 2012. Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. American Economic Review, vol. 102 (6): 2981-3003.
12. Foucault, T. and Fresard, L., 2014. Learning from peers' stock prices and corporate investment. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 111 (3): 554-577.
13. Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M., 1990. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 33 (2): 233-258.
14. Han, S.K., 1994. Mimetic isomorphism and its effect on the audit services market. Social Forces, vol. 73 (2): 637-664.
15. John, K. and Kadyrzhanova, D., 2008. Peer effects in corporate governance. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2008 (1): 1-45.
16. Kytle, B. and Ruggie, J.G., 2005. Corporate social responsibility as risk management: A model for multi-nations. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper No.10.
17. Lin, M.-C. and Chih, H.-L., 2019. On the peer effect of corporate social responsibility. Working Paper, National Taipei University.
18. Lanis, R. and Richardson, G., 2012. Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, vol. 26 (1): 75-100.
19. Leary, M.T. and Roberts, M.R., 2014. Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy? The Journal of Finance, vol. 69 (1): 139-178.
20. Matray, A., 2014. The local innovation spillovers of listed firms. Working Paper, HEC Paris.
21. Moskowitz, M., 1972. Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, vol. 1: 71-75.
22. Spicer, B.H., 1978. Market risk, accounting data and companies’ pollution control records. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 5 (1): 67-83.
23. Zimmerman D.J., 2003. Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 85 (1): 9-23.
24. 石桂峰, 2015. 地方政府干预与企业投资的同伴效应. 财经研究, vol. 39 (12): 84-94.
25. 曹亞勇, 王建瓊, 於麗麗, 2012. 公司社會責任信息披露與投資效率的實證研究. 管理世界, vol. 12: 36-43.
26. 張兆國, 梁志鋼, 尹開國, 2012. 利益相關者視角下企業社會責任問題研究. 中國軟科學, vol. 30 (2): 139-146.
27. 張兆國, 靳小翠, 李賡秦, 2013. 企業社會責任與財務績效之間交互跨期影響實證研究. 會計研究, vol. 8: 32-39.
28. 萬良勇,梁嬋娟,饒靜,2016. 上市公司併購決策的行業同群效應研究. 南開管理評論, 2016 (3): 40-50.
29. 趙穎,李姝,童婧,2013. 社會責任報告降低了企業權益資本嗎?—來自中國資本市場的經驗證據. 會計研究, 2013 (9): 64-70.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71539-
dc.description.abstract當前對於企業社會責任之研究主要針對財務面對公司企業社會責任表現之影響,而忽略了同儕企業之行為對公司採取企業社會責任之決策的影響。同儕研究企業社會責任表現之同儕效應指其他企業的社會責任表現的外生效應影響。
本文選取了2012-2017年中國滬深兩市A股主板上市公司共3901個樣本數據,通過理論分析和實證驗證向結合之方法,探究了樣本數據企業社會責任表現的同群效應。研究發現:(1)中國企業之企業社會責任表現會顯著受到同行業、同地區公司企業社會責任表現之影響,即存在“同儕效應”。(2)企業社會責任之相對表現存在可預測性:若當期企業社會責任表現高於同儕企業之社會責任表現,則下一期該企業高於同儕企業之社會責任表現的可能性更高。(3)企業社會責任之絕對分數存在可預測性:若當期企業社會責任表現高於同儕企業之社會責任表現,則下一期該企業之社會責任表現分數下降。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractRecent research on CSR mainly focuses on the impact of financial status on the corporate's performance of CSR, while ignoring that peer companies also have influences on the corporate's CSR decisions. The peer effect of CSR refers to the extrinsic impact on CSR performance due to other companies CSR performance in the same industry or geographical area.
This paper selects 3,901 samples of A-share companies listed on the Main Board in Shanghai and Shenzhen markets from 2012 to 2017. By conducting empirical analysis on the peer effect of CSR, I find that (1) peer effect of CSR exists in China; (2) the relative CSR performance is predictable if a company's CSR performance outperform its peer group last year, it's more likely the company will surpass its peer group this year; (3) the absolute CSR score is predictable if a company's CSR score is greater than its peer group's last year, there's a high chance its CSR score will decrease this year.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:02:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-R06723067-1.pdf: 1526222 bytes, checksum: 5148dc70684dbb4f92dceb7394cf90f2 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontents一,引言 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.1.1企業社會責任 1
1.1.2同儕效應 2
1.2研究意義 3
1.3研究內容、目標及方法 4
1.3.1研究內容及目標 4
1.3.2研究方法和主要工作 4
二,國內外研究現狀 6
2.1企業社會責任之研究文獻回顧 6
2.1.1企業社會責任之界定與內涵 6
2.1.2企業社會責任中政府角色和行為之研究 7
2.2同儕效應之研究文獻回顧 8
2.2.1同儕效應之定義 8
2.2.2同儕效應之存在及應用 9
2.3文獻之簡要評論 10
三,假說與數據 12
3.1研究假說 12
3.2樣本選擇和數據來源 13
3.2.1變量定義 13
四,模型建立與實證分析 16
4.1檢定同儕效應 16
4.1.1行業間同儕效用 16
4.1.2地區間同儕效應 18
4.1.3行業間、地區間同儕效應 19
4.2企業社會責任同儕效應之相對表現預測 19
4.2.1行業間同儕效應之相對表現預測 20
4.2.2地區間同儕效應之相對表現預測 20
4.2.3行業間、地區間同儕效應之相對表現預測 21
4.3企業社會責任同儕效應之絕對分值預測 21
五,研究結論 23
5.1結論 23
5.2政策建議 23
5.2.1以上市公司角度 23
5.2.2以政府監管機構角度 24
5.2.3以評鑑機構角度 24
參考文獻 26
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject政府管理zh_TW
dc.subject企業社會責任zh_TW
dc.subject同儕效應zh_TW
dc.subjectGovernment Managementen
dc.subjectCorporate Social Responsibilityen
dc.subjectPeer Effecten
dc.title企業社會責任“同儕效應”之實證分析zh_TW
dc.titleAn Empirical Analysis of the 'Peer Effect' of Corporate Social Responsibilityen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear107-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee周冠男(Robin K. Chou),徐之強(Chih-Chiang Hsu)
dc.subject.keyword企業社會責任,同儕效應,政府管理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCorporate Social Responsibility,Peer Effect,Government Management,en
dc.relation.page39
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201900254
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2019-01-29
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept財務金融學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:財務金融學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-108-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.49 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved