請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71436
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱祈榮 | |
dc.contributor.author | "Yi-Cheng, Lu" | en |
dc.contributor.author | 盧翊程 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:00:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-15 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-02-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-02-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Akgul, O., Zamboni, A., Bezzo, F., Shah, N., & Papageorgiou, L. G. (2010). Optimization-based approaches for bioethanol supply chains. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 50(9), 4927-4938.
Akgul, O., Mac Dowell, N., Papageorgiou, L. G., & Shah, N. (2014). A mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) supply chain optimisation framework for carbon negative electricity generation using biomass to energy with CCS (BECCS) in the UK. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 28, 189-202. Arai, Hironori, et al. 'Greenhouse gas emissions from rice straw burning and straw-mushroom cultivation in a triple rice cropping system in the Mekong Delta.' Soil science and plant nutrition 61.4 (2015): 719-735. Bakker, R. R. C., Elbersen, H. W., Poppens, R. P., & Lesschen, J. P. (2013). Rice straw and wheat straw-potential feedstocks for the biobased economy. NL Agency. Bergman, P. C., Boersma, A. R., Zwart, R. W. R., & Kiel, J. H. A. (2005). Torrefaction for biomass co-firing in existing coal-fired power stations. Energy Centre of Netherlands, Report No. ECN-C-05-013. Bridgwater, A. V. (2003). Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chemical Engineering Journal, 91, pp. 87–102. Bruckman, V. J. (2016). Biochar. Cambridge University Press. British Petroleum Company. (2016). BP statistical review of world energy. London: British Petroleum Co. Caputo, A. C., Palumbo, M., Pelagagge, P. M., & Scacchia, F. (2005). Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28(1), 35-51. Carbo, M. C., Abelha, P. M. R., Cieplik, M. K., Kroon, P., Mourao Vilela, C. F., & Kiel, J. H. A. (2016). Handling, storage and large-scale co-firing of torrefied biomass pellets. Policy Studies, 2015(2014), 2013. Carlos, R. M., & Khang, D. B. (2008). Characterization of biomass energy projects in Southeast Asia. Biomass and bioenergy, 32(6), 525-532. Ceballos, D. C. C., Hawboldt, K., & Hellleur, R. (2015). Effect of production conditions on self-heating propensity of torrefied sawmill residues. Fuel, 160, 227-237. Darmawan, A., Fitrianto, A. C., Aziz, M., & Tokimatsu, K. (2017). Enhanced electricity production from rice straw. Energy Procedia, 142, 271-277. De Meyer, Annelies & Cattrysse, Dirk & Orshoven, Jos. (2013). A mixed integer linear programming model for the strategic optimisation of biomass-for-bioenergy supply chains. Deng, J., Wang, G. J., Kuang, J. H., Zhang, Y. L., & Luo, Y. H. (2009). Pretreatment of agricultural residues for co-gasification via torrefaction. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 86(2), 331-337. Gadde, B., Menke, C., Siemers, W., Pipatmanomai, S., (2008). Technologies for energy use of rice straw: a review. Int. Rice Res. Notes 33. Gaunt, J. L., & Lehmann, J. (2008). Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production. Environmental science & technology, 42(11), 4152-4158. Guillemot A, Bruant R, Pasquiou V, Boucher E. (2014). Feasibility study for the implementation of two ORC power plants of 1 MWe each using rice straw as a fuel in the context of a public-private partnership with the institutions PhilRice and UPLB. Courbevoie, France: ENERTIME. Global, B. P. (2011). BP Energy Outlook 2030. London, UK. Guo, M., Song, W., & Buhain, J. (2015). Bioenergy and biofuels: History, status, and perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 712-725. Hammond J, Shackley S, Sohi S, Brownsort P (2011) Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar systems in the UK. Energy Policy 39:2646–2655 Homagain, K., Shahi, C., Luckai, N., & Sharma, M. (2015). Life cycle environmental impact assessment of biochar-based bioenergy production and utilization in Northwestern Ontario, Canada. Journal of Forestry Research, 26(4), 799-809. International Biochar Initiative [IBI]. (2014). Standardized Product Definition and Product Testing Guidelines for Biochar That is Used in Soil. [online] Available at: www. biochar-international.org/characterizationstandard IEA. (2013). World energy outlook 2013. OECD/IEA. Paris, France. IEA. (2016). World Energy Outlook 2016. OECD/IEA. Paris, France. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/weo-2016-en IRENA. (2012). Renewable Energy Technologies: A Cost Analysis Series. Volume 1: Power Sector, Issue 1/5, Biomass for Power Generation. IRENA. June, 2012. IRENA. (2014). Global Bioenergy Supply and Demand Projections: A working paper for REmap 2030. [website] retrieve from http://irena.org/remap/ IRENA. (2018), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2017, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Ishii, Kazuei & Furuichi, Toru & Fujiyama, Atsushi & Watanabe, Shintaro. (2016). Logistics cost analysis of rice straw pellets for feasible production capacity and spatial scale in heat utilization systems: A case study in Nanporo town, Hokkaido, Japan. Biomass and Bioenergy. 94. 155-166. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.08.007. Kiel, J. (2012). Torrefaction to improve biomass logistics (and end-use). Kumar, D., & Singh, B. (2017). Role of biomass supply chain management in sustainable bioenergy production. Biofuels, 1-11. Kumar, A. and S. Sokhansanj. (2006). “Swithgrass (Panicum vigratum, L.) Delivery to a Biorefinery Using Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis and Logistics (IBSAL) Model.” Kung, C. C., McCarl, B. A., & Chen, C. C. (2014). An environmental and economic evaluation of pyrolysis for energy generation in Taiwan with endogenous land greenhouse gases emissions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 11(3), 2973-2991. Kung, C. C., Kong, F., & Choi, Y. (2015). Pyrolysis and biochar potential using crop residues and agricultural wastes in China. Ecological indicators, 51, 139-145. Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2009). Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earth scan, pp. 1–12. Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (Eds.). (2015). Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge. McCarl, B. A., Peacocke, C., Chrisman, R., Kung, C. C., & Sands, R. D. (2009). Economics of biochar production, utilization and greenhouse gas offsets. Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology, 341-358. Mobini, M., Sowlati, T., & Sokhansanj, S. (2011). Forest biomass supply logistics for a power plant using the discrete-event simulation approach. Applied energy, 88(4), 1241-1250. Mol, R., Jogems, M. A. H., Van Beek, P., & Gigler, J. K. (1997). Simulation and optimization of the logistics of biomass fuel collection. NJAS wageningen journal of life sciences, 45(1), 217-228. Nilsson, D. (1999). SHAM—a simulation model for designing straw fuel delivery systems. Part 1: model description. Biomass and Bioenergy, 16(1), 25-38. Nixon, J. D., Dey, P. K., Davies, P. A., Sagi, S., & Berry, R. F. (2014). Supply chain optimisation of pyrolysis plant deployment using goal programming. Energy, 68, 262-271. Ringer, M., Putsche, V. and Scahill, J. (2006). Large-scale pyrolysis oil production: a technology assessment and economic analysis. Technical Report NERL/TP-51037779, doi: 10.2172/894989. Roberts, K. G., Gloy, B. A., Joseph, S., Scott, N. R. and Lehmann, J. (2010). Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, pp. 827–833. Shackley, S., Sohi, S., Brownsort, P., Carter, S., Cook, J., Cunningham, C., ... & Mašek, O. (2010). An assessment of the benefits and issues associated with the application of biochar to soil. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government, London. Shackley, S., Hammond, J., Gaunt, J., & Ibarrola, R. [UKBRC]. (2011). The feasibility and costs of biochar deployment in the UK. Carbon Management, 2(3), 335-356. [link] https://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/sshackle/CostsBiochar.pdf Sokhansanj, S., A. Kumar, A.F. Turhollow, 2006. Development and implementation of integrated biomass supply analysis and logistics model (IBSAL). Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 30, No. 10, pp. 838-847. Wilson, J. M., McKinney, L. J., Theerarattananoon, K., Ballard, T. C., Wang, D., Staggenborg, S. A., & Vadlani, P. V. (2014). Energy and cost for pelleting and transportation of select cellulosic biomass feedstocks for ethanol production. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 30(1), 77-85. World Bank and Ecofys. 2018. “State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018 (May)”, by World Bank, Washington, DC. Doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1292-7. Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2010). Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Communications, 1, article No. 56. Zandi Atashbar, N., Labadie, N., & Prins, C. (2017). Modelling and optimisation of biomass supply chains: a review. International Journal of Production Research, 1-25. Zhao, M. Y., Enders, A., & Lehmann, J. (2014). Short-and long-term flammability of biochars. biomass and bioenergy, 69, 183-191. Zeng, X., Ma, Y., & Ma, L. (2007). Utilization of straw in biomass energy in China. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 11(5), 976-987. 工研院,(2014),廢棄物能源運用。工業技術研究院 綠能與環境研究所,廢棄物能源利用專案報告。 王川威與侯仁義,(2009)。我國可燃燒再生能源及廢棄物統計方式探討,台灣綜合研究院。 古森本. (2008). 生質能源作物之開發與潛力. 農業生技產業季刊, (13), 46-53. 方信雄. (2014). 農業廢棄物資源化及收集模式之研究. 臺灣大學生物產業機電工程學研究所學位論文, 1-75. 主計處,(2017),農業廢棄物排放帳,主計處網站,綠色國民所得https://www.stat.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas03/bs7/greengnp/3-1-3-2.pdf[2018/5/24] 吳耿東(2016)臺灣生質電力發展方向與展望。物理雙月刊,38(3),12-17 吳耿東、李宏台(2004)化腐蝕為能源—物盡其用的生質能源。科學發展2004年11月,383期,20 ~ 27頁。 李昆洲,2010,生質物供應後勤之成本與碳排放分析,碩士論文,國立台灣大學環境工程研究所,台北市。 林彥妤. (2012). 殘餘生質物再利用之能源潛勢與生命週期評估. 臺灣大學環境工程學研究所學位論文, 1-126. 林裕仁, & 潘薇如. (2016). 木質能源於國內能源利用之評估分析. 臺灣林業科學, 31(3), 169-180. 唐鈺清. (2012). 稻稈轉換生質酒精供應鏈之最佳空間規劃模式─ 以嘉南灌區為例. 臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文, 1-100. 郭訓志. (2014). 稻稈集運利用規劃之研究. 宜蘭大學生物機電工程學系學位論文, 1-119. 許富翔. (2011). 稻稈焙燒產製生質煤炭之生命週期評估. 臺灣大學環境工程學研究所學位論文, 1-135. 蔡佳儒、吳耿東,(2016),臺灣農業廢棄物製備生物炭之未來與展望. 農業生技產業季刊, (46), 24-28. 張慶源,(2013),生質燃料應用評估與示範。行政院環境保護署環境檢驗所委託研究,計畫編號:EPA-101-1605-02-03 趙麗妍,(2018),興大研發生物炭量產商業化設備助土壤改良。中央社。http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aloc/201810090211.aspx。〔2018.10.09〕 蘇孟娟,(2018)。興大教師設計「黑金爐」 能把修剪樹枝、稻草變身「農業黑金」。自由時報。http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/Taichung/breakingnews/2575776。〔2018.10.09〕 農傳媒,(2016),粗糠變身黑珍寶:附掛式稻殼連續炭化裝置,烘穀兼燒炭。農傳媒,2016年12月31日。 環保署,(2014),農業廢棄物管理策略,https://agriculture.epa.gov.tw/pdf/農業廢棄物管理策略.pdf[2018/5/24] 經濟部,(2018),中華民國一百零七年度再生能源電能躉購費率及其計算公式,經濟部公告,經能字第10604606690號,〔2018.01.08〕 經濟部能源局,(2016),105 能源統計年報/臺灣能源指標,經濟部能源局統計年報。 臺中市政府環保局,2017,外埔堆肥廠轉型綠能生態園區專案報告,臺中市議會第2屆第5次定期會。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71436 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來全球對於能源的需求日益迫切,尤其是發展中的再生能源。臺灣地區能源多數仰賴進口,唯有推動能源多樣性、提升能源自給率才能穩定能源供應。然而在臺灣地區生質能源發展屢屢受限,如能源效率不如燃煤、後勤物流成本高以及原料供給量不確定性,使得生質能源供應鏈中占比甚少。本研究為解決上述問題,以稻稈剩餘資材作為生質能源發電之原料,使用熱裂解技術生成電能,同時解決傳統稻稈去化方式的碳排放問題。熱裂解所生成的產品亦能減低碳排放,因此值得吾人進行評估。
本研究提出一系列生質能源發電廠選址方案,在滿足稻稈去化需求的條件下,發展出兼具投資可行性與固碳效益之供應鏈模型。本研究首先針對北台灣地區稻 作資源進行盤點,估算生質能源原料的供應量;再來建構供應鏈模型,設定目標式、參數式和限制式,利用混合整數線性規劃(MILP)求解;最後,針對稻稈熱裂解發電的各項成本與效益進行成本效益分析,判斷投資可行性,並假設情境探討可能的投資風險,進行敏感度分析,以利政府或投資者進行決策。 本研究選取北台灣的桃園市與新竹縣市行政區的稻田作為腹地,所得到的稻稈原料量估計為 82,740 公噸。在供應鏈模型中,成本部分計入收集、運輸、儲藏、預處理、轉化成本,效益部分計入售電收益、減碳收益、產品收益。以最小化成 本為目標,MILP 求解結果顯示小型分散型生質能源發電廠較為有利,且僅需 4 座生質能源發電廠,分別設於大園、新屋、竹縣、楊梅等地,即可滿足北台灣稻稈去化需求。在淨現值計算的部分,分散型生質能源發電廠 NPV 約為 3.26 億元新台幣,明顯優於前者的1.42億元新台幣。IRR 計算中,分散型生質能源發電廠為13%, 優於前者的8%,營利指數也以2.43略高於前者的1.82。最後在折現還本期的表現,小型生質能源發電廠能在 6.02 年後回本,相較於前者需要8.55年。 最後本研究進行情境分析與敏感度分析,將稻稈剩餘資材的收購費用降為0元,則可大幅減支出,變動成本從48.58億元新台幣降為37.00 億元新台幣。而另 外情境二則給予售電更高的單位電價,使得收益部分最多增加 7978 萬元新台幣。 敏感度分析中則以電力成本變動影響最大,倉儲成本次之。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, the global demand for energy has become increasingly urgent, especially in the development of renewable energy. Most of Taiwan's energy depends on imports. Only by promoting energy diversity and increasing energy self-sufficiency can we stabilize energy supply. However, the development of biomass energy in Taiwan is often limited. For example, energy efficiency is not as good as coal burning, logistics logistics costs and raw material supply uncertainty, making the proportion of raw energy supply chain very small. In order to solve the above problems, this study uses rice straw surplus materials as raw materials for biomass energy generation, uses thermal cracking technology to generate electricity, and solves the carbon emission problem of traditional rice straw removal methods. The products produced by thermal cracking can also reduce carbon emissions, so it is worthy of our evaluation.
This study proposes a series of site selection schemes for biomass energy power plants. Under the conditions of meeting the demand for rice straw removal, a supply chain model with both investment feasibility and carbon sequestration benefits is developed. This study firstly conducted an inventory of rice resources in northern Taiwan, estimated the supply of raw materials for raw materials, and then constructed a supply chain model, setting target, parametric and restricted, using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to solve; Cost-benefit analysis of various costs and benefits of rice stalk thermal cracking power generation, judging investment feasibility, and assuming the situation to explore possible investment risks, and conducting sensitivity analysis for the government or investors to make decisions. In this study, the rice fields in Taoyuan City of North Taiwan and the administrative district of Hsinchu County were selected as the hinterland, and the amount of rice straw raw materials obtained was estimated to be 82,740 metric tons. In the supply chain model, the cost component is included in the collection, transportation, storage, pre-processing, and conversion costs, and the benefit component is included in the sales revenue, carbon reduction income, and product revenue. In order to minimize the cost, the MILP solution results show that the small-distributed biomass energy power plant is more advantageous, and only four biomass energy power plants are needed, which are located in Dayuan, Zhinwu, Zhushien, Yangmei and other places. North Taiwan rice stalk de-chemical needs. In the part of the net present value calculation, the NPV of the distributed biomass energy power plant is about NTD 326 iv million, which is significantly better than the former's 142 million NTD. In the IRR calculation, the dispersed biomass energy power plant is 13%, which is better than the former 8%, and the profit index is also 2.43 slightly higher than the former 1.82. Finally, in the current performance of discounted, the small biomass energy power plant can return to the original after 6.02 years, compared with 8.55 years compared with the former. Finally, the study carried out the situation analysis and sensitivity analysis, reducing the acquisition cost of the remaining materials of rice straw to 0 NTD, can significantly reduce the cost up to NTD 1.1 billion. In addition, the second situation gives a higher unit price for electricity sales, which increases the income portion by up to NTD 7.9 million. In the sensitivity analysis, the change in raw material collection cost has the greatest impact, and the power cost is second. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:00:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R04625004-1.pdf: 2274822 bytes, checksum: 5c6d639ba3156b4c13dcf6adf1291ba0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
誌謝 i 中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 國外生質能源供應鏈研究 5 2.2 臺灣能源供應鏈 8 2.3 稻稈熱裂解發電研究 10 第三章 研究方法 13 3.1 模型建立 15 3.1.1 目標式 16 3.1.2 限制式 21 3.1.3 收益計算 22 3.2 研究設定 25 3.2.1 研究資料處理 25 3.2.2 製程參數設定 28 3.3 成本效益分析 33 第四章 研究結果 36 4.1 MILP規劃成本效益 36 4.2 集中型熱裂解發電成本效益 38 4.3 分散型熱裂解發電成本效益 41 4.4 兩種方案比較與情境分析 43 4.5 敏感度分析 48 第五章 結論與建議 51 參考文獻 53 附錄 59 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 混合整數線性規劃應用於生質能源供應鏈研究-以北臺灣地區稻稈熱裂解發電為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Applying Rice Straw in Bioenergy Supply Chain Management Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming: A Case Study of Northern Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林俊成,林裕仁 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 生質能源,碳排放,生物炭,供應鏈最佳化,混合整數線性規劃, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | biomass energy,carbon,emissions,biochar,supply chain optimization,mixed integer linear programming, | en |
dc.relation.page | 70 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900433 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-02-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.22 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。