請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71434
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 江東亮(Tung-Liang Chiang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Hsuan Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林依宣 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:00:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-03-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-02-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Burkhalter LW. Gideon Lincecum, 1793-1874: a biography. University of Texas Press, 1965.
2. Proctor RN. Tobacco and the global lung cancer epidemic. Nat Rev Cancer 2001; 1:82-6. 3. Adler I. Primary malignant growths of the lungs and bronchi; a pathological and clinical study. New York, : Longmans, Green and Company, 1912. 4. Pearl R. TOBACCO SMOKING AND LONGEVITY. Science 1938; 87:216-7. 5. Ferrante G, Simoni M, Cibella F, et al. Third-hand smoke exposure and health hazards in children. Monaldi archives for chest disease = Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace 2013; 79:38-43. 6. Hang B, Sarker AH, Havel C, et al. Thirdhand smoke causes DNA damage in human cells. Mutagenesis 2013; 28:381-91. 7. Matt GE, Quintana PJE, Hovell MF, et al. Households contaminated by environmental tobacco smoke: sources of infant exposures. Tobacco Control 2004; 13:29-37. 8. Do YK, Bautista MA. Tobacco use and household expenditures on food, education, and healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:1098. 9. John RM, Ross H, Blecher E. Tobacco expenditures and its implications for household resource allocation in Cambodia. Tobacco Control 2011. 10. Bunker JP, Frazier HS, Mosteller F. Improving health: measuring effects of medical care. The Milbank quarterly 1994; 72:225-58. 11. Preston SH. The Changing Relation between Mortality and Level of Economic Development. Population Studies 1975; 29:231-48. 12. Wilkinson RG. Income distribution and life expectancy. BMJ : British Medical Journal 1992; 304:165-8. 13. 呂宗學, 陳端容, 江東亮. 釐清健康不平等相關名詞. 台灣公共衛生雜誌 2015; 34:115-8. 14. Mackay J, Eriksen MP, WHO. The Tobacco Atlas. World Health Organization, 2002. 15. Mills AL, Messer K, Gilpin EA, Pierce JP. The effect of smoke-free homes on adult smoking behavior: A review. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2009; 11:1131-41. 16. Siahpush M, Borland R, Scollo M. Is household smoking status associated with expenditure on food at restaurants, alcohol, gambling and insurance? Results from the 1998-99 Household Expenditure Survey, Australia. Tob Control 2004; 13:409-14. 17. Longman JM, Passey ME. Children, smoking households and exposure to second-hand smoke in the home in rural Australia: analysis of a national cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2013; 3. 18. World Health Organization. Systematic review of the link between tobacco and poverty. 2011. 19. Carmelli D, Swan GE, Robinette D, Fabsitz R. Genetic Influence on Smoking — A Study of Male Twins. New England Journal of Medicine 1992; 327:829-33. 20. Mickens L, Ameringer K, Brightman M, Leventhal AM. Epidemiology, determinants, and consequences of cigarette smoking in African American women: an integrative review. Addictive behaviors 2010; 35:383-91. 21. Lorand FI, Zoltan A, Lorand S, Peter B, Foley KL. Tobacco use among children in Romanian foster care homes. European journal of public health 2016; 26:822-6. 22. Caleyachetty R, Khaw KT, Surtees PG, Wainwright NW, Wareham N, Griffin SJ. Cumulative social risk exposure in childhood and smoking and excessive alcohol use in adulthood. European journal of public health 2016; 26:575-81. 23. Mayne SL, Auchincloss AH, Moore KA, et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of neighbourhood social environment and smoking behaviour: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2016. 24. Goel S, Sharma D, Gupta R, Mahajan V. Compliance with smoke-free legislation and smoking behaviour: observational field study from Punjab, India. Tobacco Control 2017. 25. Lin SJ. Estimating the determinants of smoking behavior in Taiwan. Substance use & misuse 2010; 45:482-95. 26. 羅晉. 政策變遷整合性分析架構之研究:臺灣菸害防制政策的觀察. 政策研究學報 2014:1-31. 27. 衛生福利部國民健康署. 2016臺灣菸害防制年報. 2016:131. 28. Berkman LF, Kawachi I. Social Epidemiology. A Historical Framework for Social EpidemiologySocial Determinants of Population Health, 2014. 29. Shaw M. Health Inequality: An Introduction to Theories, Concepts and Methods. Mel Bartley. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004, pp. 224, £16.99 (PB), ISBN: 0745627803. International Journal of Epidemiology 2005; 34:500-2. 30. Krieger N. A glossary for social epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2001; 55:693-700. 31. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60:7-12. 32. Mueller CW, Parcel TL. Measures of Socioeconomic Status: Alternatives and Recommendations. Child Development 1981; 52:13-30. 33. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annual review of public health 1997; 18:341-78. 34. Cowan CD, Hauser R, Kominski R, et al. Improving the measurement of socioeconomic status for the national assessment of educational progress: A theoretical foundation. National Center for Education Statistics Retrieved from http://files eric ed gov/fulltext/ED542101 pdf 2012. 35. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Platt S. Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: the rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smoker. Journal of public health (Oxford, England) 2012; 34:390-6. 36. Gorini G, Carreras G, Allara E, Faggiano F. Decennial trends of social differences in smoking habits in Italy: a 30-year update. Cancer causes & control : CCC 2013; 24:1385-91. 37. Federico B, Kunst AE, Vannoni F, Damiani G, Costa G. Trends in educational inequalities in smoking in northern, mid and southern Italy, 1980–2000. Preventive Medicine 2004; 39:919-26. 38. Verlato G, Accordini S, Nguyen G, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking habits are still increasing in Italy. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:879. 39. Pierce JP, Fiore MC, Novotny TE, Hatziandreu EJ, Davis RM. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States: educational differences are increasing. Jama 1989; 261:56-60. 40. Pärna K, Pürjer M-L, Ringmets I, Tekkel M. Educational differences in cigarette smoking among adult population in Estonia, 1990–2010: does the trend fit the model of tobacco epidemic? BMC Public Health 2014; 14:709-. 41. Giskes K, Kunst AE, Benach J, et al. Trends in smoking behaviour between 1985 and 2000 in nine European countries by education. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2005; 59:395-401. 42. Nagelhout GE, de Korte-de Boer D, Kunst AE, et al. Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking prevalence, consumption, initiation, and cessation between 2001 and 2008 in the Netherlands. Findings from a national population survey. BMC Public Health 2012; 12:303-. 43. Jang TW, Kim HR, Choi SE, et al. Smoking rate trends in Korean occupational groups: analysis of KNHANES 1998-2009 data. Journal of occupational health 2012; 54:452-8. 44. Khang Y-H, Cho H-J. Socioeconomic inequality in cigarette smoking: Trends by gender, age, and socioeconomic position in South Korea, 1989–2003. Preventive Medicine 2006; 42:415-22. 45. Yáñez AM, Leiva A, Estela A, Čukić I. The associations of personality traits and parental education with smoking behaviour among adolescents. PLOS ONE 2017; 12:e0174211. 46. Doku D, Koivusilta L, Rainio S, Rimpelä A. Socioeconomic Differences in Smoking Among Finnish Adolescents From 1977 to 2007. Journal of Adolescent Health 2010; 47:479-87. 47. Rathmann K, Pfortner TK, Elgar FJ, Hurrelmann K, Richter M. The Great Recession, Adolescent Smoking, and Smoking Inequalities: What Role Does Youth Unemployment Play in 24 European Countries? Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 2017; 19:1284-91. 48. 張心潔. 臺灣家庭社經地位與無菸家庭關係之變遷. 臺灣大學預防保健與衛生學2006. 49. 張玉青, 葉國樑. 台北市某國中學生吸菸行為意向與其相關因素之研究. 學校衛生 2006:63-81. 50. 李蘭, 潘怜燕. 台灣地區成年人之吸菸率與吸菸行為:八十八年度之全國性調查. 中華公共衛生雜誌 2000; 19:423-36. 51. 李宜家, 林慧淳, 江東亮. 地區剝奪程度、個人社經地位與臺灣男性成人的吸菸行為. 台灣公共衛生雜誌 2003; 22:10-6. 52. Chuang Y-C, Li Y-S, Wu Y-H, Chao HJ. A multilevel analysis of neighborhood and individual effects on individual smoking and drinking in Taiwan. BMC Public Health 2007; 7:151. 53. Victora CG, Vaughan JP, Barros FC, Silva AC, Tomasi E. Explaining trends in inequities: evidence from Brazilian child health studies. Lancet (London, England) 2000; 356:1093-8. 54. Link BG, Northridge ME, Phelan JC, Ganz ML. Social epidemiology and the fundamental cause concept: on the structuring of effective cancer screens by socioeconomic status. The Milbank quarterly 1998; 76:375-402, 304-5. 55. Escobedo LG, Peddicord JP. Smoking prevalence in US birth cohorts: the influence of gender and education. American journal of public health 1996; 86:231-6. 56. Frohlich KL, Potvin L. Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations. American journal of public health 2008; 98:216-21. 57. Black D, Townsend P, Davidson N. Inequalities in Health: The Black Report. Penguin, 1992. 58. Layte R, Whelan C. Explaining social class differentials in smoking: the role of education. 2004. 59. Schnittker J. Education and the Changing Shape of the Income Gradient in Health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 2004; 45:286-305. 60. 劉正, 陳建州. 產業變遷與勞動流動。台灣的社會變遷1985~2005. 台灣社會變遷調查計畫第十一次研討會,中央研究院 2008. 61. Johnson S, Cooper C, Cartwright S, Donald I, Taylor P, Millet C. The experience of work-related stress across occupations. Journal of managerial psychology 2005; 20:178-87. 62. Kouvonen A, Kivimäki M, Virtanen M, Pentti J, Vahtera J. Work stress, smoking status, and smoking intensity: an observational study of 46 190 employees. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2005; 59:63-9. 63. Organization WH, Initiative WTF. Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control. 2008. 64. 莊小瑤. 臺灣2002年菸稅改革前後吸菸型態之變化. 臺灣大學預防保健與衛生學2004. 65. Guindon GE, Tobin S, Yach D. Trends and affordability of cigarette prices: ample room for tax increases and related health gains. Tobacco Control 2002; 11:35-43. 66. Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tobacco Control 2012; 21:172-80. 67. P. BM, S. CC, Madeline Z. Effects of venue-specific state clean indoor air laws on smoking-related outcomes. Health Economics 2010; 19:1425-40. 68. Adda J, Cornaglia F. The Effect of Bans and Taxes on Passive Smoking. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2010; 2:1-32. 69. Carpenter C, Postolek S, Warman C. Public-place smoking laws and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2011; 3:35-61. 70. Owyang MT, Vermann EK. Where there’sa smoking ban, there’s still fire. Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review 2012. 71. 何明修. 〈教育改革運動的政策回應〉。頁 172-211,收錄於何明修、林秀 幸主編,《社會運動的年代─晚近二十年來的台灣行動主義》. 台北: 群學出版社。 2011. 72. 張宜君, 林宗弘. 高等教育擴張與階級不平等: 以台灣高等教育改革為例. 論文發表於 [2013 台灣社會學年會: 台灣社會的再轉型], 台北: 台灣社會學會 2013. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71434 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景與目的:菸品對於健康的危害從全世界到個人各個層次都有影響,而台灣在菸害監測與防制上主要是針對個人層次,鮮少關注於家庭層次,但是家中有吸菸者是會透過二手菸、三手菸、菸品消費排擠其他消費的方式,影響家庭其他成員的健康。要提升全民健康便是公共衛生所關注的影響健康的因素中,與醫療同等重要的社經因素在台灣卻鮮少被注重,然吸菸不平等的現象時常在國外研究中所發現,故要解決台灣菸害問題,應從社會經濟的角度切入。本研究目的有三,(一) 描述吸菸家庭趨勢;(二)探討家庭社經地位與吸菸家庭關係之變遷;(三)探討菸害重要全國性事件對不同家庭社經地位之吸菸家庭率影響之變遷。
方法:本研究針對多年度的全國性重複橫斷性資料作次級資料分析,依變項為家庭吸菸狀態,自變項為家庭社經地位,其三個指標為家戶收入分位、戶長教育程度與戶長職業。單變項先描述各個變項歷年的趨勢,並檢定全國歷年吸菸家庭率之趨勢;雙變項以卡方檢定各變項與家庭吸菸狀態之間的關係,再使用連結點分析瞭解家庭社經地位各組之趨勢轉折點已及組間的平行檢定,進一步以戶長性別與年齡分層,瞭解分層後各家庭社經地位組別之趨勢;最後多變項分析以對數複回歸模式用九個粗略模型以及三個模型將變項分別以不同組合的方式放入,以瞭解變項對於吸菸家庭率的影響。 結果:(一)吸菸家庭率逐年下降,自1980年開始由78.42%下降至 27.78%;(二)戶長教育程度各組間的吸菸家庭率差距逐年擴大;(三)家戶收入分位各組間的吸菸家庭率差距逐年縮小;(四)戶長職業各組間的吸菸家庭率差距先縮小再擴大;(五)無法證明菸害重要全國性是建是否對吸菸家庭率有效果。 結論:台灣吸菸家庭率的趨勢會因為不同家庭社經地位指標而有所不同,考量了家庭特性後,戶長教育程度與戶長職業在每一年確實多出現了社會不平等現象,因此政府應該要關注吸菸家庭指標,並且要關心社會不平等的現象,針對較低的戶長教育程度與戶長職業制訂政策以解決菸害問題。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The health-harming effects of tobacco is not only at the individual level, but also at the family level, even at the worldwide population level. Mostly, Taiwan’ s department of Health puts efforts at the individual level, but not at the family level. However, this issue on househould-level is important as well, because tobacco has negative influences on family members through environmental tobacco smoke, thirdhand smoke and supplanting other expenditures. To solve this problem, we should focus on socioeconomic status, which is found to be the root cause of most of health issues and smoking inequalities.
Objectives: This thesis was aimed to examine (1) Trend in smoking families prevalence, (2) trend in the relationships between household socioeconomic status and household smoking status, (3) the influences of national tobacco related events on trends in smoking families proportion of different household socioeconomic status groups, in Taiwan. Methods: Data for Survey of Family Income and Expenditure in Taiwan (19800-2016) were analysed to explore the prevalence of household smoking status and socioeconomic characteristics. Joinpoint regression analysis was applied to test the trend, and multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the association of household smoking status and household socioeconomic status, controlling for potential confounders. Results: (1) Smoking families prevalence have declined from 78.42% to 27.78% since1980, (2)widening educational gap in smoking families proportion was found, (3) narrowing trends in household income-related smoking inequalities, (4) the difference between the head of occupation groups got broader marginally in the beginning, then got smaller slightly, (5) the impact of national tobacco related events was not detected on any trend. Conclusions: Using different indicators of household socioeconomic status may result in different trends of smoking families prevalence. After controlling for family characteristics, the social disparities of smoking families exist in most of years, therefore, the government should concern smoking families rate as an important index and tackle inequality. One of solutions for smoking problems could be putting the family with lower education and occupation of family head as a first priority when formulate policy. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:00:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05848023-1.pdf: 7073508 bytes, checksum: 111aa4bf640a135f643709a3a8af18b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要(Abstract) iv 第一章 前言 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節 家庭吸菸狀態 3 第二節 家庭社經地位 4 第三節 過去研究 6 第四節 相關理論與假說 12 第三章 研究方法 14 第一節 研究架構與假說 14 第二節 研究資料 14 第三節 研究變項 17 第四節 分析方法 22 第四章 研究結果 24 第一節 樣本特性 24 第二節 雙變項分析 27 第三節 分層分析 30 第四節 多變項分析 35 第五節 連結點迴歸分析 40 第五章 討論與建議 45 第一節 討論 45 第二節 研究限制 48 第三節 建議 49 參考文獻 53 附錄 163 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣家庭社經地位與家庭吸菸狀態關係:趨勢研究,1980—2016 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relationship between Socioeconomic Status and Smoking Status at Household-level in Taiwan: a Trend Study, 1980-2016 | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張書森(Shu-Sen Chang),張齡尹(Ling-Yin Chang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 家庭社經地位,不平等,吸菸趨勢,家庭吸菸狀態,趨勢研究, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | household socioeconomic status,inequality,smoking trend,household smoking status,trend study, | en |
dc.relation.page | 166 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900400 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-02-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.91 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。