請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71261
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德(Pei-Te Chiueh) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-Kai Chuang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 莊雯凱 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T05:01:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahiablame, L., Shakya, R. (2016). Modeling flood reduction effects of low impact development at a watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 171, 81-91.
Brown, A., Matlock, M.D. (2011). A review of water scarcity indices and methodologies. White paper, 106, 19. Bratieres, K., Fletcher, T.D., Deletic, A., Zinger, Y. (2008). Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: A large-scale design optimisation study. water research, 42, 3930-3940. Chini, C.M., Konar, M., Stillwell, A.S. (2017). Direct and indirect urban water footprints of the United States. Water Resources Research, 53(1), 316-327. Chelsea J. Martin-Miklea, Kirsten M. de Beursa, Jason P. Julian b. and Paul M. Mayer. (2015). Identifying priority sites for low impact development (LID) in a mixed-use watershed. Landscape and Urban Planning,140, 29–41. EU. (2015). EU Resource Efficiency Scoreboard 2014, European Union. Falkenmark, M., Lundqvist, J., Widstrand, C. (1989). Macro‐scale water scarcity requires micro‐scale approaches. Natural resources forum. Wiley Online Library. 258-267. Ghimire, S.R., Johnston J.M., Ingwersen, W.W., Sojka, S. (2017). Life cycle assessment of a commercial rainwater harvesting system compared with a municipal water supply system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 74-86. Gold, A. J., Groffman, P. M., Addy, K., Kellogg, D. Q., Stolt, M., Rosenblatt, A. E. (2001). Landscape attributes as controls on groithd water nitrate removal capac-ity of riparian zones 1. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(6), 1457–1464. Harris, F., Green, R.F., Joy, E.J., Kayatz, B., Haines, A., Dangour, A.D. (2017). The water use of Indian diets and socio-demographic factors related to dietary blue water footprint. Science of The Total Environment, 587, 128-136. Hess, T., Chatterton, J., Daccache, A., Williams, A. (2016). The impact of changing food choices on the blue water scarcity footprint and greenhouse gas emissions of the British diet: the example of potato, pasta and rice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4558-4568. Hsieh, P.Y., Shiu, H.Y., Chiueh, P.T. (2016). Reconstructing nutrient criteria for source water areas using reference conditions. Sustainable Environment Research of CIEnvE,26, 243-248. Hoekstra, A.Y., Chapagain, A.K. (2006). Water footprints of nations: water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. in: Integrated assessment of water resources and global change, Springer, 35-48. Hoekstra, A.Y., Chapagain, A.K., Aldaya, M.M., Mekonnen, M.M. (2011). The water footprint assessment manual. Setting the global standard. Earthscan, London. Hoekstra, A.Y. (2003). Virtual water: An introduction. Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade. Value of water research report series (11), 13-23. Hoff, H., Döll, P., Fader, M., Gerten, D., Hauser, S., Siebert, S. (2014). Water footprints of cities indicators for sustainable consumption and production. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 213–226. IPCC. (2008). Climate change and water. In: Technical Paper VI, Geneva, Switzerland, 244. ISO, I. (2014). 14046: Environmental Management - Water Footprint - Principles, Requirements and Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. Kluge, B., Markert A., Facklam M., Sommer, H., Kaiser, M., Pallasch, M., Wessolek, G. (2018). Metal accumulation and hydraulic performance of bioretention systems after long-term operation. Journal of Soils Sediments, 18, 431-441. Lee, Y.-J., Tung, C.-M., Lee, P.-R., Lin, S.-C. (2016). Personal Water Footprint in Taiwan: A Case Study of Yunlin County. Sustainability, 8(11), 1112-1124. Lee, Y.-J. (2015). Land, carbon and water footprints in Taiwan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 54, 1-8. Lucke T., Nichols, W.B.P. (2015). The pollution removal and stormwater reduction performance of street-side bioretention basins after ten years in operation. Science of The Total Environment, 536, 784-792. Li, H., Davis, A.P. (2008). Heavy Metal Capture and Accumulation in Bioretention Media. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 5247-5253. Mackay, R., Last, E. (2010). SWITCH city water balance: a scoping model for integrated urban water management. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 9(4), 291-296. Manzardo, A., Loss, A., Fialkiewicz, W., Rauch, W., Scipioni, A. (2016). Methodological proposal to assess the water footprint accounting of direct water use at an urban level: A case study of the Municipality of Vicenza. Ecological Indicators, 69, 165-175. Mekonnen, M.M., Hoekstra, A.Y. (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1577–1600. Mekonnen, M.M., Hoekstra, A.Y. (2014). Water footprint benchmarks for crop production: A first global assessment. Ecological indicators, 46, 214-223. Morera, S., Corominas, L., Poch, M., Aldaya, M., Comas, J. (2016). Water footprint assessment in wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4741-4748. Mudgal, S., Tan, A., Lockwood, S., Eisenmenger, N., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Giljum, S., Brucker, M. (2012). Assessment of Resource Efficiency Indicators and Targets. Final Report. European Commission-DG Environment, BIO Intelligence Service. Mitchell V.G., Mein R.G., McMahon T.A. (2001). Modelling the urban water cycle. Environmental Modelling & Software, 16, 615–629. Nepomilueva, D. (2017). Water scarcity indexes: water availability to satisfy human needs. Palla, A., Gnecco, I., La Barbera, P. (2017). The impact of domestic rainwater harvesting systems in storm water runoff mitigation at the urban block scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 191, 297-305. Passeport, E., Vidon, P., Forshay, K.J, Harris, L., Kaushal, S.S, Kellogg, D.Q. (2013). Ecological engineering practices for the reduction of excess N in human influenced landscapes: A guide for watershed managers. Environmental Management, 51, 392-413. Paul, M. J., Meyer, J. L. (2001). Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecol-ogy and Systematics, 32, 333–365. Quinteiro, P., Ridoutt, G. B., Arroja L., Dias, A. C. (2018). Identification of methodological challenges remaining in the assessment of a water scarcity footprint: a review. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, 164-180. Renouf, M., Serrao-Neumann, S., Kenway, S., Morgan, E., Choy, D.L. (2017). Urban water metabolism indicators derived from a water mass balance–bridging the gap between visions and performance assessment of urban water resource management. Water Research, 122, 669-677. Renouf, M.A., Kenway, S.J. (2017). Evaluation approaches for advancing urban water goals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(4), 995-1009. Renouf, S., Gregory, A., McMahon, J. (2011). Urban water mass balance analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(5), 693-706. Rost, S., Gerten, D., Bondeau, A., Lucht, W., Rohwer, J., Schaphoff, S. (2008). Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system. Water Resources Research, 44(9). Song, J.Y, Chung, E.S. (2017). A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis System for Prioritizing Sites and Types of Low Impact Development Practices: Case of Korea. Water, 9, 291-308. Siebert, S., Döll, P. (2010). Quantifying blue and green virtual water contents in global crop production as well as potential production losses without irrigation. Journal of Hydrology, 384(3), 198-217. Takawira, G. (2017). Review of Methodologies of Water Footprint. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(5), 1-5. Trauring, S.E., Aviani, I., Avisar, D., Bernstein, N. (2016). Integrating High Resolution Water Footprint and GIS for Promoting Water Efficiency in the Agricultural Sector :A Case Study of Plantation Crops in the Jordan Valley. Front. Plant Sci, 7, 1877. Thériault, J., Laroche, A.M. (2009). Evaluation of the urban hydrologic metabolism of the Greater Moncton region, New Brunswick. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 34(3), 255-268. URBAN_WFTP. (2014). Introduction of Water Footprint (WFTP) Approach in Urban Area to Monitor, Evaluate and Improve the Water Use, (Eds.) W.U.o.E.A.L.S. Institute of Environmental Engineering, U.o.P. Department of Industrial Engineering, U.o.I. Unit for Environmental Engineering, Central Europe. Vanham, D., Bidoglio, G. (2014). The water footprint of Milan. Water Science and Technology, 69(4), 789-795. Vialle, C., G. Busset L., Tanfin, M., Montrejaud-Vignoles, M.C. Huau, C. Sablayrolles. (2015). Environmental analysis of a domestic rainwater harvesting system: A case study in France. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 102, 178–184. Wang, Z., Huang, K., Yang, S., Yu, Y. (2013). An input–output approach to evaluate the water footprint and virtual water trade of Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 172-179. 中技社 (民105)。2016臺灣資源效率暨環境品質報告。 許文龍 (民105)。水環境低衝擊開發設施操作手冊,內政部營建署。 廖信凱、林鎮洋 (民105)。低衝擊開發對於逕流抑制評估 - 以桃園航空城雙溪基地為例,土木水利,43(5),59-68。 黃治峯、陳炳麟、林宗輝 (民105)。打造臺北市海綿城市-以市區道路人行道透水性鋪面之透水率及都市效能為例,台北市工務局。 南陽化學工業股份有限公司 (民105)。屋頂平台滲透井保水系統設計手冊。 行政院環保署 (民102)。降雨逕流非點源污染最佳管理技術(BMPs)。 周嫦娥、李繼宇、林惠芬、阮香蘭 (民100)。企業水資源管理新指標-水足跡,工業污染防治。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71261 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 全球的水資源缺乏(water scarcity)議題正隨著氣候變遷、全球人口數與人口密度的增加,以及更多地區的都市化與工業化而日趨嚴重;而位於人口集中的都市地區,在未來更是水資源缺乏衝擊的首當其衝區域。也因此,都市地區的水資源管理甚為重要,並需要兼顧全面性以及細緻性的水資源評估指標,分析都市地區的水資源消耗情形,進而研擬應對水資源消耗的減量措施。其中,水足跡評估方法目前被廣泛地應用於集水區以及農產品等不同尺度之水資源消耗分析,提供不同水資源消耗者的水資源消耗量資訊;另一方面,低衝擊開發設施(Low impact development, LID)之技術則做為水資源消耗的新興減量策略,以低成本、低環境衝擊以及低耗能的方式攔截雨水資源並加以再利用。然而,目前水足跡分析的空間尺度多為集水區尺度,並較少以都市尺度進行分析,更無分析都市內部空間上的水資源消耗熱點與變異性之相關文獻;此外,目前的LID相關文獻僅針對小規模的實場,分析逕流削減的效益;都市水資源管理者在大規模設置LID時,也需要得知優先設置的地區以及評估設置後的逕流減量效益;目前也沒有以水資源評估指標分析LID在逕流削減過後,能夠為都市水資源消耗帶來的減量效益。
本研究針對臺北市地區建立高空間解析度之水足跡評估指標,以地理資訊系統軟體,根據內政部國土利用分類建立適宜水足跡評估之土地分類系統,藉以區分出都市內部不同的經濟型態,將都市水足跡的總量估算結果進行空間分析,建立以目前空間統計尺度最小的一級經濟發布區之水足跡評估方法,分析小尺度區塊內部的直接用水水足跡(包括藍水足跡、綠水足跡以及都市總體污水產生的灰水足跡);並根據不同低衝擊開發設施之裝置特性以及合適設置的土地覆蓋種類,整合水足跡消耗熱點之空間分布結果,以地理資訊系統輔助判釋LID的可設置面積,並建立LID的空間設置準則與分析LID的優先設置點位,以大安區為示範區,透過SWMM (Stormwater management model)模式評估雨水回收系統、生物滯留系統,以及透水鋪面於都市降雨逕流的削減量與水足跡熱點的減量效益。 都市水足跡總體的估算結果顯示,三種水足跡的主要貢獻來源為都市人為污水所構成的灰水足跡,以及建築物的藍水足跡;其中又由住宅建築物構成了最大的水資源消耗量;另一方面,藍水降雨逕流量則為次於建築物藍水足跡之水資源消耗,顯示出臺北市地區仍有許多不透水面構成的降雨逕流可被回收與再利用。高空間解析度的建築物藍水足跡分析結果則顯示出,最大的6個水足跡消耗熱點由商業以及機關等用地所貢獻,而住宅建築物則構成了約41個水足跡消耗熱點,從高解析度的分析結果可以顯現不同經濟型態的水資源消耗程度、消耗密度以及都市水資源消耗的空間分布。低衝擊開發設施的減量模擬結果顯示,雨水回收系統具有最多的可設置面積,並能夠達到65%的逕流削減率以及48%的建築物藍水足跡取代率。另一方面,生物滯留系統與透水鋪面的可設置面積則約介於各一級經濟發布區的2%~12%之間,然而相對少量的設置面積之下最多則能夠分別削減32%的都市逕流灰水足跡以及15%的逕流量。藉由本研究所建立的高空間解析度都市水足跡評估、LID空間設置以及減量效益模擬方法,得以顯現都市水資源消耗空間特徵,並依據土地使用特性配置LID裝置,增加都市對於水資源缺乏衝擊的調適能力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Water scarcity has become one of the major concerned issue throughout the world, which is currently aggravated mainly due to climate change, global population growth, urbanization and industrialization. Among them, urban regions are the most densely populated area, which could be easily affected by water resource depletion impact relative to other regions. Therefore, water resource management can be crucial in solving urban water scarcity issues by identifying spatial hotspots of water consumption and formulating respond strategies in the corresponding hotspots. Urban water footprint (WF) accounting is an emerging method that provides comprehend information of urban water consumption by analyzing blue, green and gray water footprint of different water consumers. Moreover, emerging technology as Low Impact Development (LID) are claimed to be one of the promising technology to recycle and reuse urban rainwater.
However, urban scaled WF accounting couldn’t reveal the spatial variation of water consumption, preventing local water managers from identifying WF hotspots and prior location for water use reduction strategies. In addition, with efficiency and functionality of LIDs remain unknown, there is a need to simulate and assess the practicality of different LIDs implemented with city-wide scale through water consumption indicator. This study aims to establish 1) a bottom-up approached urban WF accounting framework and explore urban WF of Taipei city in 2016 with high spatial resolution characteristic by integrating land use map, spatially detailed water consumption data based on geographical information system (GIS) for the purpose of visualizing spatial pattern of water resource consumption, and therefore 2) establishing spatial installation criteria for LIDs according to spatial hotspots of WF, which are then integrated with 3) SWMM (Stormwater management model) modeling to simulate runoff reduction and WF reduction after implementing LIDs (rainwater harvesting system, bioretention system and permeable pavement) on the corresponding hotspots with Da’an district as a demonstration area. The WF accounting results shows that 6 blue WF hotspots with the highest blue WF are found across the city contributed by commercial and institution buildings; while household tap water consumption resulted in the most hotspots. Moreover, considerable amount of grey WF of tap water indicates that WF of Taipei city is highly affected by the water quality of wastewater and ambient water quality regulation. Visualization of WF accounting result also reveals that many blue water runoff hotspots of rainwater could be recycled and reused to reduce tap water consumption in a sustainable way; hotspots of grey WF of rainwater also suggest that further treatment should be applied on urban runoff to ease the pollution load in the river. The relationship of spatial pattern of WF and socioeconomic factors is also discussed. LID simulation result shows that rainwater harvesting system have the most available installation area, leading to substitution rate of blue WF of tap water up to 48%. However, due to limited data availability, the available area for the installation of bioretention system and permeable pavement are 1% to 12% of each hotspot area on average. Despite the low installation area, there are rather high reduction of gray WF of road up to 32% and runoff reduction up to 15%. This study seeks to present an integrated urban water footprint assessment with an intuitive WF quantification method, and combining it with spatial characteristics to enhance the adaptability of the city faced with the impact of water resource depletion, and integrating LID performance analysis to assist existing resource management policies. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T05:01:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05541201-1.pdf: 7569150 bytes, checksum: 570fba8917954f2146e06bc25b906e9d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iv 目錄 vi 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 xi 第一章、緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與目的 1 1.2 研究架構與流程 4 第二章、文獻回顧 7 2.1 水資源評估指標 7 2.1.1 水質量平衡(Water Mass Balance) 7 2.1.2 水壓力指標(Water Stress Indicator) 8 2.1.3 水資源效率指標(Water Resource Efficiency Indicator) 9 2.1.4 水足跡估算(Water Footprint Assessment) 10 2.2 水足跡評估 11 2.2.1 水足跡估算方法 12 2.2.2 水足跡評估的應用 13 2.3 土地利用分類與整合 19 2.4 低衝擊開發設施(Low Impact Development, LID) 20 2.5 海綿城市(Sponge City) 24 第三章、研究方法 26 3.1 水足跡盤查範疇界定 26 3.2 水足跡評估模式 28 3.2.1 都市水足跡方法的採用與調整 28 3.2.2 都市水足跡評估 29 3.3 SWMM 模式 34 3.4 低衝擊開發設施 35 3.5 案例分析 42 3.5.1 資料蒐集彙整與前處理 42 3.5.2 都市雨水足跡分析 43 3.5.3 都市建築物水足跡分析 50 3.5.4 LID 空間設置情境模擬與量化 51 3.5.5 SWMM 模式資料盤查與模式建置 53 第四章、研究結果 56 4.1 2016年臺北市各類建物水足跡盤查結果 56 4.1.1 都市藍水足跡與綠水足跡盤查結果 56 4.1.2 灰水足跡估算結果 60 4.2 高空間解析度水足跡分析結果 66 4.2.1 一級經濟發布區藍水足跡、綠水足跡 66 4.2.2 一級經濟發布區灰水足跡 74 4.3 低衝擊開發設施之水足跡減量效益量化結果 80 4.3.1 SWMM逕流模擬結果與熱點設置 80 4.4 綜合討論 90 4.4.1 一級經濟發布區水足跡 90 4.4.2 高空間解析度水足跡評估模式的限制 92 4.4.3 灰水足跡估算限制 95 4.4.4 低衝擊開發設施模擬 97 第五章、結論與建議 98 5.1 結論 98 5.2 建議 100 第六章、參考文獻 102 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 高空間解析度都市水足跡評估與低衝擊開發設施效益分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Urban water footprint accounting with GIS-based high spatial resolution and low impact development (LID) performance analysis | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 駱尚廉(Shabg-Lien Lo),馬鴻文(Hwong-Wen Ma),林逸彬(Yi-Pin Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 水資源管理,都市水足跡,高空間解析度,低衝擊開發設施, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Water resource management,Urban water footprint,High spatial resolution,Low impact development, | en |
dc.relation.page | 105 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801241 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 7.39 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。