請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71194
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 許添本(Tien-Pen Hsu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ying-Chieh Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林瑩潔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T04:57:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-13 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] 交通部統計資料查詢網, '監理事故常用資料查詢-機動車輛登記數,' 2018.
[2] S. R. Perkins, & Harris, J. I., 'Traffic conflict characteristics accident potential at intersections,' 1967. Research Laboratories, General Motors Corporation [3] F. Amundsen, & Hyden, C., 'The Swedish traffic conflict technique,' 1977. InProceedings of First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts, Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo (pp. 1-5) [4] G. R. Brown and P. J. Cooper, 'Role of conflicts in traffic analysis,' in Proceedings of 3rd Workshop of International Cooperation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic Safety, Cracow, 1990, pp. 116-123. [5] W. D. Glauz and D. J. Migletz, 'Application of traffic conflict analysis at intersections,' 0077-5614, 1980. [6] C. Hyden, 'The Decelopment of Method for TrafJic Safety Ecaluntion: The Swedish Traffic Conflict Technique,' 1987. Bull. 70. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund [7] A. Svensson, A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective. Lund Institute of Technology, 1998. [8] E. Sacchi and T. Sayed, 'A comparison of collision-based and conflict-based safety evaluations: The case of right-turn smart channels,' Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 59, pp. 260-266, 2013. [9] 財團法人資訊工業策進會, '交通事故資料分析,' 2016. [10] 交通部運輸研究所, '混合車流路口道路與交通工程設計範例(1/4),' 2017. [11] G. D. A. Tarko, N. Saunier et al., 'White paper: surrogate measures of safety,' 2009. in Committee on Safety Data Evaluation and Analysis (ANB20) [12] J. C. Hayward, 'Near miss determination through use of a scale of danger,' 1972. [13] A. R. A. Van der Horst, A time based analysis of road user behaviour in normal and critical encounters (no. HS-041 255). 1990. [14] M. M. Minderhoud and P. H. Bovy, 'Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment,' Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 89-97, 2001. [15] T. Sayed, G. Brown, and F. Navin, 'Simulation of traffic conflicts at unsignalized intersections with TSC-Sim,' Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 593-607, 1994. [16] K. Vogel, 'A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators,' Accident analysis & prevention, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 427-433, 2003. [17] Q. Meng and X. Qu, 'Estimation of rear-end vehicle crash frequencies in urban road tunnels,' Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 48, pp. 254-263, 2012. [18] F. Huang, P. Liu, H. Yu, and W. Wang, 'Identifying if VISSIM simulation model and SSAM provide reasonable estimates for field measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections,' Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 50, pp. 1014-1024, 2013. [19] T. Sayed, M. H. Zaki, and J. Autey, 'Automated safety diagnosis of vehicle–bicycle interactions using computer vision analysis,' Safety science, vol. 59, pp. 163-172, 2013. [20] A. A. o. S. Highway and T. Officials, 'A policy on geometric design of highways and streets: 2011,' ed: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Washington (DC), 2011. [21] H. Farah, S. Bekhor, A. Polus, and T. Toledo, 'A model for passing decisions on two-lane rural highways,' 2008. [22] G. Hegeman, Assisted overtaking: An assessment of overtaking on two-lane rural roads (no. T2008/4). TRAIL Research School Delft, the Netherlands, 2008. [23] S. S. Mahmud, L. Ferreira, M. S. Hoque, and A. Tavassoli, 'Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: a review of recent developments and research needs,' IATSS research, 2017. [24] A. Hansson, 'STUDIES IN DRIVER BEHAVIOUR, WITH APPLICATIONS IN TRAFFIC DESIGN AND PLANNING: TWO EXAMPLES,' 1975. [25] B. L. Allen, B. T. Shin, and P. J. Cooper, 'Analysis of traffic conflicts and collisions,' 0361-1981, 1978. [26] A. Laureshyn, Application of automated video analysis to road user behaviour. 2010. [27] 蕭唯倫, '應用資料探勘技術針對肇事碰撞型態建立路口分支風險和肇事因子模型,' 臺灣大學土木工程學研究所學位論文, pp. 1-107, 2015. [28] 交通部運輸研究所, '2001年台灣地區公路容量手冊,' 2001. [29] 張學孔, '混合車流狀況下右轉流動特性及容量之研究,' 碩士, 土木工程研究所, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市, 1983. [30] 陳翔捷, '應用貝式方法於交叉口左轉決策與風險評估模式,' 臺灣大學土木工程學研究所學位論文, pp. 1-115, 2013. [31] W. Brilon, R. Koenig, and R. J. Troutbeck, 'Useful estimation procedures for critical gaps,' Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 161-186, 1999/04/01/ 1999. [32] 范玉琳, '交叉路口綠燈早開或遲閉號誌控制之研究,' 碩士, 土木工程研究所, 國立成功大學, 台南市, 1979. [33] 蔡輝昇, '行人道系統的研究,' 碩士, 土木工程研究所, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市, 1979. [34] 吳國安, '公車專用車道在平面交叉路口之電算機模擬研究,' 碩士, 土木工程研究所, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市, 1981. [35] 郭正成, '機車在交叉路口接受間距特性之研究,' 碩士, 交通運輸研究所, 國立交通大學, 新竹市, 1982. [36] 簡益正, '非號誌化交叉路口容量與延滯之研究,' 碩士, 交通運輸研究所, 國立交通大學, 新竹市, 1994. [37] 曾平毅、張瓊文、張倩宜、王寶珍、李裕生, '國科會研究計畫-號誌化路口衝突左轉停等車疏解行為之研究,' 2005. [38] B. D. Greenshields, D. Schapiro, and E. L. Ericksen, 'Traffic performance at urban street intersections,' 1946. [39] M. S. Raff, 'A volume warrant for urban stop signs,' 1950. [40] A. E. Radwan, K. C. Sinha, and H. L. Michael, 'Development and Use of a Computer Simulation Model for the Evaluation of Design and Control Alternatives for Intersections of Minor Road with Multi-Lane Rural Highways: Field Studies and Model Validation: Interim Report,' 1979. [41] P. Solberg and J. C. Oppenlander, 'Lag and gap acceptances at stop-controlled intersections,' 1964. [42] A. Polus, 'Gap acceptance characteristics at unsignalised urban intersections,' Traffic engineering and control, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 255-258, 1983. [43] H. C. Manual, 'Special report 209,' Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, vol. 1, p. 985, 1985. [44] B. E. Peterson, A. Hansson, and K. Bang, 'Swedish capacity manual,' Transportation Research Record, vol. 667, pp. 1-28, 1977. [45] D. Cooper, P. Storr, and J. Wennell, 'Traffic studies at T-junctions. 4. The effect of speed on gap acceptance and conflict rate,' Traffic Engineering & Control, vol. 18, no. Analytic, 1977. [46] O. Adebisi and G. N. Sama, 'Influence of stopped delay on driver gap acceptance behavior,' Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 305-315, 1989. [47] H. H. Bissell, Traffic gap acceptance from a stop sign. University of California, Berkeley, 1960. [48] K. Sinha, 'SECTION GAP ACCEPTANCE PHENOMENON AT STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS,' Traffic Engineering, Inst Traffic Engr, 1971. [49] R. Ashworth and C. Bottom, 'Some observations of driver gap-acceptance behaviour at a priority intersection,' Traffic Engineering and Control, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 569-571, 1977. [50] D. R. Drew, 'Traffic flow theory and control,' 1968. [51] F. A. Wagner Jr, 'An evaluation of fundamental driver decisions and reactions at an intersection,' Highway Research Record, no. 118, 1966. [52] O. K. Dart Jr, 'LEFT-TURN CHARACTERISTICS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ON FOUR-LANE ARTERIAL STREETS,' Highway Research Record, no. 230, 1968. [53] J. Darzentas, M. McDowell, and D. F. Cooper, 'Minimum acceptable gaps and conflict involvement in a simple crossing manoeuvre,' Traffic Engineering & Control, vol. 21, no. 2, 1980. [54] H. Mahmassani and Y. Sheffi, 'Using gap sequences to estimate gap acceptance functions,' Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 143-148, 1981/06/01/ 1981. [55] M. A. Pollatschek, A. Polus, and M. Livneh, 'A decision model for gap acceptance and capacity at intersections,' Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 649-663, 2002/08/01/ 2002. [56] M. E. Ben-Akiva, S. R. Lerman, and S. R. Lerman, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT press, 1985. [57] R. J. Troutbeck, 'Estimating the Critical Acceptance Gap from Traffic Movements,' 1992. esearch Report, 92-5. [58] Z. Tian et al., 'Implementing the maximum likelihood methodology to measure a driver’s critical gap,' Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 187-197, 1999/04/01/ 1999. [59] 国土交通省自動車交通局先進安全自動車推進検討会, '先進安全自動車(ASV)推進計画報告書,' 2011. [60] 交通部運輸研究所, '混合車流情境之機車交通安全工程設計方法研究驗證與推廣,' 2016. [61] 高雄市:高雄市政府交通局, '2014年高雄市易肇事路口改善委託研究案,' 2014. [62] 交通部, '道路交通標誌標線號誌設置規則,' 中華民國106年6月14日更新. [63] 孫將瓴, '市區道路小汽車變換車道防撞警示系統之研究,' 碩士, 土木工程學研究所, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市, 2006. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71194 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 側撞為台灣最常見肇事類型,占總肇事數量約四成,其中主要包含了右轉側撞和左轉穿越側撞,常見涉入車種為轉向車以及直行機車,對於機車駕駛傷害程度較高。過去常用肇事數量來衡量道路之安全,但可能面臨肇事資料不完整,輕微事件無紀錄,個人隱私問題,資料蒐集所需時間較長且肇事資料也代表事件已發生,近幾年多以衝突替代肇事判斷路口安全,能減少資料蒐集時間,也能在事件發生前做出主動式安全分析。
台灣因大量機車,擁有特殊混和車流形式,許多國外開發之智慧車輛系統,如自駕車、防撞系統等並不完全適用於台灣的車流情況,必須要先在地化。然而,現有關於右轉車流與同向直行機車流之接受間距之相關研究稀少。本研究最主要之目的乃是研究右轉汽車與同向直行機車駕駛人在都市內之交叉路口接受間距之特性。在號誌化路口,標線型快慢分隔路行下,右轉車有明顯的穿越行為,利用適當之研究方法,分析右轉汽車穿越直行機車接受間距之特性。且分為半間距(Lag)和間距(Gap),以及將接受(accepted)與拒絕(rejected)代表右轉車輛穿越與不穿越行為。 資料之調查選擇高雄與台中地區各一個交叉路口,利用錄影機進行資料之調查及整理,並以衝突與斷面位置關係衡量針對右轉側撞改善路口之前後差異,且使用適當之統計方法分析汽車右轉接受間距之特性。由分析結果顯示,近路口取消慢車道線並繪設分流指向線對於右轉側衝突是有效果的,但改善策略若無多方配合效果有限。對於右轉接受間距方面,可發現不同路口但路型相同之半間距(Lag)分布會相同,相同路口之半間距(Lag)與間距(Gap)分布也相同;以臨界間距來看臨界半間距較臨界間距大;本研究採用具有個體選擇觀念之二元羅吉特模式做為接受間距模式邏輯建構,並分成接受半間距模式與接受間距兩大模式,以右轉汽車與直行機車之車速與干擾區內機車數及(半)間距等影響變數,構建右轉汽車穿越直行機車接受間距決策邏輯。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Side collisions are the most common types of accidents in Taiwan, accounting for about 30% of the total number of accidents. The side collisions including mainly Through with Right Collision and Left Turn with Opposing Through Collision. Commonly involved types of vehicles are turning vehicle and straight scooter, which have a higher degree of damage to the scooter. In the past, the number of accidents was commonly used to measure the safety of roads. However, it may face incomplete information on accidents, such is minor incidents without records, personal privacy issues, long data collection time and the data also represents the accidents had happened. In recent years, the use of conflict alternatives to judge intersection safety, which can reduce the time required for data collection and also enable active safety analysis before the incident happened.
Taiwan has a large number of scooters and has a specially mixed traffic flow. Many smart vehicle systems developed overseas, such as self-driving cars and collision avoidance systems, do not fully be useful in Taiwan and must first be localized. However, there are few studies on the correlation between the right-turn traffic flow and the straight-line traffic flow. The main purpose of this study is to study the characteristics of the gap acceptance between the right-turn car and straight scooters at an intersection in the city. In the environment, the signalized intersection, and the road type of the fast/slow lane with marking divider, and the right-turn car has obvious crossing behavior. Use appropriate research methods to determine the gap acceptance characteristics of the right-turn vehicle crossing through straight scooters. It is divided into Lag and Gap, and will accept and reject which represented the right-turn vehicles crossing and not crossing. The survey selected each intersection in Kaohsiung and Taichung city and used a video recorder to conduct surveys and collation of the data. And conflict with the positional relationship between the cross-sectional differences before the measure for improve intersections for through and right collision. And use appropriate statistical methods to analyze the characteristics of right-turn gap acceptance. According to the analysis results, the cancellation of the slow lane line near the intersection and the drawing of the diversion direction line can improve the through and right collision, but the improvement strategy has no effect if there is no multi-party coordination. For the right turn gap acceptance, we can find that at the different intersections with the same road type the Lag distribution will be the same, and the Lag and the Gap distribution at the same intersection will be the same. The critical Lag is longer than the critical Gap. In this study, using logit model as the gap acceptance decision model, which contains lag and gap models. Gap acceptance decision model is based the relevant variables such as speeds of the right-turn car and the straight scooter, number of scooters in interfering area and (lag)gap through traffic video analysis that influence gap acceptance behavior. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:57:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05521526-1.pdf: 7057974 bytes, checksum: f4b6ce9abdd464479caf96f6063d3b50 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
摘要 III Abstract IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 IX 表目錄 XI 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與背景 1 1.2 研究目的 3 1.3 研究範圍 4 1.4 研究內容與流程 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 交通衝突技術 6 2.1.1 交通衝突參數 11 2.2 接受間距 17 2.2.1 國內接受間距研究 19 2.2.2 國外接受間距研究 24 2.2.3 接受間距模式應用特性 25 2.2.4 接受間距模式型式 27 2.3 右轉側撞車輛防撞警示 31 2.3.1 日本 31 2.3.2 台灣 33 第三章 台灣右轉側撞特性與改善措施 35 3.1 碰撞分類 35 3.2 碰撞原因 37 3.2.1 道路環境因素 37 3.2.2 駕駛本身行為因素 45 3.2.3右轉側撞原因統整 46 3.3 改善措施 47 3.3.1 鄰近路口取消慢車道 47 3.3.2 機車停等區分流 50 3.3.3 快慢實體分隔之快車道右轉管制 53 3.3.4 右轉側撞改善策略綜合整理 56 第四章 資料蒐集與分析方法 57 4.1 調查目標與流程 57 4.2 資料蒐集 58 4.2.1 拍攝準備作業 58 4.2.2 拍攝方式與時間 60 4.2.3 車流影像資料處理分析 61 4.3 分析方法 63 4.3.1 改善前後分析方法 63 4.3.2 接受間距 66 第五章 右轉側撞之交通衝突參數評估比較分析 76 5.1 路口改善前後評估 76 5.1.1 車輛斷面位置分布 77 5.1.2 潛在衝突分析 83 5.1.3 後侵占時間分析 84 5.2 右轉汽車與同向直行機車接受間距特性 85 5.2.1 應用無母數檢定對樣本群檢定 85 5.2.2 接受間距模式 88 5.2.3 右轉穿越同向直行車決策模式 91 第六章 結論與建議 98 6.1 結論 98 6.2 建議 99 參考文獻 101 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 交叉口右轉側撞之接受間距與交通衝突參數特性之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of the Characteristics of Gap Acceptance and Traffic Conflict Indexes in Through with Right Collision at the Intersection | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳水威,葉名山 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 交叉口安全,右轉側撞,後侵佔時間,接受間距,右轉決策,個體決策模式, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Intersection Safety,Through and Right Collision,Post Encroachment Time,Gap Acceptance,Right-Turn Decision,Discrete Choice Model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 104 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801976 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.89 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。