請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71042
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳俊杉(Chuin-Shan Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Shih-Sheng Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張世昇 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T04:50:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-31 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] Shirole, A. M., & Holt, R. C. (1991). Planning for a comprehensive bridge safety assurance program. Transportation Research Record, 1290, 39-50.
[2] Melville, B. W. (1984). Live-bed Scour at Bridge Piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110(9), 1234-1247. [3] Sheppard, D. M., & Miller, W. (2006). Live-Bed Local Pier Scour Experiments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 132(7), 635-642. [4] Raudkivi, A. J., & Ettema, R. (1983). Clear-Water Scour at Cylindrical Piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 109(3), 338-350. [5] Graf, W. H., & Istiarto, I. (2002). Flow pattern in the scour hole around a cylinder. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 40(1), 13-20. [6] Breusers, H. N. C., Nicollet, G., & Shen, H. W. (1977). Local Scour Around Cylindrical Piers. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 15(3), 211-252. [7] Bateni, S. M., Borghei, S. M., & Jeng, D. S. (2007). Neural network and neuro-fuzzy assessments for scour depth around bridge piers. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20(3), 401-414. [8] Zounemat-Kermani, M., Beheshti, A.-A., Ataie-Ashtiani, B., & Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.-R. (2009). Estimation of current-induced scour depth around pile groups using neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 746-755. [9] Choi, S. U., & Cheong, S. (2006). Prediction of local scour around bridge piers using artificial neural networks. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42(2), 487-494. [10] Lee, T. L., Jeng, D. S., Zhang, G. H., & Hong, J. H. (2007). Neural network modeling for estimation of scour depth around bridge piers. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 19(3), 378-386. [11] Toth, E., & Brandimarte, L. (2011). Prediction of local scour depth at bridge piers under clear-water and live-bed conditions: comparison of literature formulae and artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 13(4), 812-824. [12] Brown, M. P. S., Grundy, W. N., Lin, D., Cristianini, N., Sugnet, C. W., Furey, T. S., Ares, M., Haussler, D. (2000). Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(1), 262-267. [13] Furey, T. S., Cristianini, N., Duffy, N., Bednarski, D. W., Schummer, M., & Haussler, D. (2000). Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data. Bioinformatics, 16(10), 906-914. [14] Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002). Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines. Machine Learning, 46(1), 389-422. [15] Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. Paper presented at the European conference on machine learning. [16] Tong, S., & Koller, D. (2001). Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. Journal of machine learning research, 2(Nov), 45-66. [17] Diaz-Uriarte, R., & Alvarez de Andres, S. (2006). Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 3. [18] Pal, M. (2005). Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(1), 217-222. [19] Rodriguez-Galiano, V. F., Ghimire, B., Rogan, J., Chica-Olmo, M., & Rigol-Sanchez, J. P. (2012). An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 67, 93-104. [20] Svetnik, V., Liaw, A., Tong, C., Culberson, J. C., Sheridan, R. P., & Feuston, B. P. (2003). Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. Journal of chemical information and computer sciences, 43(6), 1947-1958. [21] Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-r., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., Kingsbury, B. (2012). Deep Neural Networks for Acoustic Modeling in Speech Recognition: The Shared Views of Four Research Groups. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6), 82-97. [22] Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Paper presented at the Advances in neural information processing systems. [23] Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484-489. [24] Johnson, P. A. (1995). Comparison of Pier-Scour Equations Using Field Data. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 121(8), 626-629. [25] Melville, B. (2008). The physics of local scour at bridge piers. In Fourth International Conference on Scour and Erosion (pp. 28-38). [26] Guyon, I., Boser, B., & Vapnik, V. (1993). Automatic capacity tuning of very large VC-dimension classifiers. Paper presented at the Advances in neural information processing systems. [27] Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273-297. [28] Breiman, L. (2017). Classification and regression trees: Routledge. [29] Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32. [30] Ho, T. K. (1995). Random decision forests. Paper presented at the Document analysis and recognition, 1995., proceedings of the third international conference on. [31] Ho, T. K. (1998). The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 20(8), 832-844. [32] Amit, Y., & Geman, D. (1997). Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees. Neural computation, 9(7), 1545-1588. [33] The Organization of Behavior [34] Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological review, 65(6), 386. [35] Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533. [36] LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989). Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural computation, 1(4), 541-551. [37] Deng, L., & Cai, C. S. (2009). Bridge scour: Prediction, modeling, monitoring, and countermeasures. Practice periodical on structural design and construction, 15(2), 125-134. [38] Froehlich, D. C. (1989). Local scour at bridge abutments. In Proceedings of the 1989 National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering (pp. 13-18). [39] Richardson, E. V., Harrison, L. J., Richardson, J. R., & Davis, S. R. (1993). Evaluating scour at bridges (No. HEC 18 (2nd edition)). [40] Zhang, F., & Fu, J. (2016, April). Noise elimination based on moving average by Guassian distribution weighting method. In Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), 2016 2nd International Conference on (pp. 169-172). IEEE. [41] Davies, L., & Gather, U. (1993). The identification of multiple outliers. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(423), 782-792. [42] Liu, H., Shah, S., & Jiang, W. (2004). On-line outlier detection and data cleaning. Computers & chemical engineering, 28(9), 1635-1647. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71042 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 鑒於台灣處於火山地震帶,地形以山地為主,地勢陡峭、河川水流湍急而導致橋墩沖刷問題十分嚴重,本研究期望藉由瞭解強降雨事件對橋樑沖刷的影響,預測沖刷深度並提早發出預警,達到橋梁之安全使用的目標。
過往的沖刷深度預測多以經驗公式推估,在準確度上常有很大的誤差,而現今有許多橋墩沖刷之監測技術可以即時性並準確地量測沖刷深度,因此可以收集到非常大量的水位、流速及沖刷深度資料。本研究透過支撐向量機(Support Vector Machine)、隨機森林(Random Forest)、深度學習(Deep Learning)等人工智慧(Artificial Intelligence)的方法,並以國家地震工程研究中心在濁水溪流域的名竹大橋、中沙大橋及自強大橋所監測的資料庫做為模型之訓練樣本和測試資料,建立水位、流速和沖刷深度之預測模型,並探討水位、流速、作用時間與沖刷深度之關聯性。 現地資料分析結果顯示水位和流速與沖刷深度關聯性極高,機器學習之預測模型明確表現作用時間對沖刷深度預測準確度的影響,並憑藉機器學習模型高度非線性的特性反應作用時間的影響以提升預測的精準度,本研究針對不同座橋梁的特性提出合適的預測架構及分析流程,而研究結果顯示利用深度類神經網路配合水位和流速兩種參數以1分鐘作用時間所建立的模型結果為佳,其在中沙大橋的平均預測精準度可以達到83%,自強大橋則為63%,雖然預測模型對於沖刷歷程無法100%精準預測,但每一場強降雨事件所導致的沖刷深度峰值皆可以準確地預測,並達到預警之作用。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With special characteristics of river, such as steep slope and rapid flow, bridge scour is an important safety issue in Taiwan. To guarantee the stability of bridge structure, ensure serviceability and give warning in advance during hazard-prone rainfall, the relationship between heavy rainfall events and local scour around piers needs to be resolved and is the focal point of this thesis.
In the past, empirical models were used to predict scour depth. Nowadays, different kinds of real-time monitoring techniques open the gateway to measure field data instantly and precisely. It is thus impetus to develop a predictive model of scour depth based on these data. In this thesis, the dataset acquired from National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, including field data of Zhuoshui River at Mingzhu Bridge, Zhongsha Bridge and Ziqiang Bridge, is used to develop the predictive model of scour depth. Three machine learning methods, including Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Deep Learning, are adapted. We find that time effect affects prediction accuracy significantly, and this issue can be resolved by highly nonlinear characteristics of machine learning. Besides, it is verified that scour depth has high correlation with water level and flow rate. A specific method of choosing the prediction time frame based on the characteristic of bridge and the corresponding analysis procedure are proposed. The feasibility of the proposed method are discussed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:50:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05521203-1.pdf: 19997941 bytes, checksum: 69e31411667c261bcb6d595d7129d490 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
誌謝 i 摘要 iii ABSTRACT v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 xv 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 前言 1 1.2 文獻回顧 2 1.3 研究動機與目的 3 1.4 研究內容與架構 4 第二章 資料前處理與機器學習方法 7 2.1 簡介 7 2.2 漢佩爾辨識法(Hampel Identifier) 7 2.3 高斯分佈權重之移動平均法(Moving Average by Gaussian Distribution Weighting Method) 8 2.4 支撐向量分類法(Support Vector Classification) 9 2.5 隨機森林(Random Forest) 15 2.6 深度學習(Deep Learning) 19 2.7 小結 25 第三章 沖刷機制與監測系統 27 3.1 簡介 27 3.2 沖刷機制 27 3.3 沖刷監測系統簡介 29 3.4 加速規與訊號特徵 31 3.5 小結 32 第四章 沖刷歷時資料庫 33 4.1 簡介 33 4.2 現地測站水位及流速資料庫 33 4.3 現地測站沖刷訊號資料庫 34 4.4 小結 35 第五章 模型訓練 81 5.1 簡介 81 5.2 分析流程說明 81 5.3 支撐向量分類法模型 82 5.4 隨機森林分類法模型 84 5.5 深度學習分類法模型 87 5.6 小結:模型分析與比較 88 第六章 結果與討論 147 6.1 簡介 147 6.2 預測結果 147 6.3 簡易評估 149 6.4 經驗公式 149 6.5 小結 150 第七章 結論與未來展望 173 7.1 結論 173 7.2 未來展望 173 參考文獻 175 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 機器學習應用於橋梁沖刷監測系統之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Machine Learning for Bridge Scour Monitoring System | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張國鎮(Kuo-Chun Chang),張書瑋(Shu-Wei Chang),張家銘(Chia-Ming Chang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 橋墩沖刷,支撐向量分類法,隨機森林,深度學習, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Local Scour around Pier,Support Vector Machine,Random Forest,Deep Learning, | en |
dc.relation.page | 179 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201802257 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 19.53 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。