請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70938
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周中哲 | |
dc.contributor.author | PHAM DINH HAI | en |
dc.contributor.author | 范廷海 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T04:44:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-03 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-09-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-21 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. AISC, A. (2010). AISC 341-10, seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction. 2. AISC-ANSI, A. I. S. C. (2010). 360-10, “Specification for Structural Steel”. Chicago (IL): American Institute of Steel Construction. 3. American Society of Civil Engineers. (2013). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10). American Society of Civil Engineers. 4. Aiken, I. D., Mahin, S. A., Uriz, P. (2002). Large-scale testing of buckling-restrained braced frames. Japan Passive Control Symposium. 5. Astaneh-Asl, A. (2010). Gusset plates in steel bridges–design and evaluation. Steel TIPS report, structural steel educational council technical information product services. Moraga, CA. 6. Architectural Institute of Japan (2009): Recommendations for stability design of steel structures, Sec. 3.5 Buckling-Restrained Braces. 7. Black, C. J., Makris, N., Aiken, I. D. (2004). Component testing, seismic evaluation, and characterization of buckling-restrained braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(6), 880-894. 8. Chaboche, J. L. (1986). Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity. International Journal of plasticity, 2(2), 149-188. 9. Chou, C. C., Chen, S. Y. (2010). Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures, 32(8), 2108-2121. 10. Chou, C. C., Liu, J. H., Pham, D. H. (2012). Steel buckling‐restrained braced frames with single and dual corner gusset connections: seismic tests and analyses. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 41(7), 1137-1156. 11. Chou, C. C., Liu, J. H. (2012). Frame and brace action forces on steel corner gusset plate connections in buckling-restrained braced frames. Earthquake Spectra, 28(2), 531-551. 12. Chou C. C., Chung, P. T., Cheng, Y. T. (2016). Experimental evaluation of large-scale dual-core self-centering braces and sandwiched buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures, 116, 12-25. 13. Chou, C. C., Beato, A. R. O. (2018). Gusset design considering buckling forces in frame and brace action directions: Test and finite element analysis of a self-centering braced frame for verification. Engineering Structures, 173, 643 14. Chou, C. C., Hsiao, C. H, Chen, Z. B, Chung, P. T, Pham, D. H. (2019). Seismic Loading Tests of Full-scale Two-story Steel Building Frames with Self-centering Braces and Buckling-restrained Braces. Thin-Walled Structures, 140, 168-181. 15. Chou, C. C., Wu, C. C. (2007). Performance evaluation of steel reduced flange plate moment connections. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(14), pp. 2083-2097. 16. C. C. and Tsai, K. C. (2002). Plasticity-fiber model for steel triangular plate energy dissipating devices. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(9), pp. 1643-1655. 17. Chou, C. C., Wu S. C. (2019). Cyclic lateral load test and finite element analysis of high-strength concrete-filled steel box columns under high axial compression. Engineering Structures, 189(15), 89-99. 18. Christopulos, A. S. (2005). Improved seismic performance of buckling-restrained braced frames (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington). 19. Dowswell B. (2012). Technical Note: Effective length factors for gusset plates in chevron braced frames. Engineering Journal, 49, 115-118. 20. Dehghani, M., Tremblay, R. (2018). Design and full‐scale experimental evaluation of seismically endurant steel buckling‐restrained brace system. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 47(1), 105-129. 21. Fahnestock, L. A., Ricles, J. M., Sause, R. (2007). Experimental evaluation of a largescale buckling-restrained braced frame. Journal of structural engineering, 133(9), 1205-1214. 22. Guo, Y. L., Tong, J. Z., Wang, X. A., Zhou, P. (2018). Subassemblage tests and design of steel channels assembled buckling-restrained braces. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 1-34. 23. Hsiao, P. C. (2013). Seismic performance evaluation of concentrically braced frames (Doctoral dissertation). 24. Hibbitt, H., Karlsson, B., Sorensen, P. (2011). Abaqus analysis user’s manual version 25. Hikino, T., Okazaki, T., Kajiwara, K., Nakashima, M. (2012). Out-of-plane stability of buckling-restrained braces placed in chevron arrangement. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(11), 1812-1822. 26. Hu, F., Shi, G., Shi, Y. (2016). A constitutive model for full-range elastoplastic behavior of structural steels with yield plateau: Calibration and validation. Engineering Structures, 118, 210-227. 27. Iwata, M., Murai, M. (2006). Buckling‐restrained brace using steel mortar planks; performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper. Earthquake engineering structural dynamics, 35(14), 1807-1826. 28. Koetaka, Y., Kinoshita, T., Inoue, K., Iitani, K. (2008). Criteria of buckling-restrained braces to prevent out-of-plane buckling. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 29. Lanning, J. T. (2014). Using buckling-restrained braces on long-span bridges near seismic faults (Doctoral dissertation, UC San Diego) 30. Liu, J. H., Chang, Y. C., Chou, C. C., Chung, P. T. (2019). Design and application of SBRB frames for steel tall buildings in Taiwan: brace orientation and connection, International Conference in Commemoration of 20th Anniversary of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake. Taiwan. 31. Lin, P. C., Tsai, K. C., Chang, C. A., Hsiao, Y. Y., Wu, A. C. (2016). Seismic design and testing of buckling‐restrained braces with a thin profile. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 45(3), 339-358 32. Lin, B. Z., Tsai, K. C. (2006). A platform of inelastic structural analysis for 3D systems–PISA3D R2. 0.2 users’ manual. National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE), Taipei, Taiwan. 33. Matsui R, Takeuchi T, Nishimoto K, Takahashi S, Ohyama T. (2010). Effective buckling length of buckling restrained braces considering rotational stiffness at restrainer ends, 7th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering 5th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings; 1049-1055. 34. Moslemi, N., Gol Zardian, M., Ayob, A., Redzuan, N., Rhee, S. (2019). Evaluation of sensitivity and calibration of the Chaboche kinematic hardening model parameters for numerical ratcheting simulation. Applied Sciences, 9(12), 2578. 35. NZS 3404. (1997). Steel structures standard, Wellington: Standards New Zealand. 36. Pham, D. H., Chou, C. C. (2020). Strong-Axis Instability of Sandwiched Buckling Restrained Braces in a Steel Two-Story X-BRBF: Seismic Tests and Finite Element Analyses. Thin-Walled Structures (accepted). 37. Sabelli, R., Mahin, S., Chang, C. (2003). Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures, 25(5), 655-666. 38. Smith, C. S., Davidson, P. C., Chapman, J. C. (1988). Strength and stiffness of ships' plating under in-plane compression and tension. Royal Institution of Naval Architects Transactions, 130. 39. Takeuchi, T., Matsui, R., Mihara, S. (2016). Out‐of‐plane stability assessment of buckling‐restrained braces including connections with chevron configuration. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 45(12), 1895-1917. 40. Takeuchi, T., Ozaki, H., Matsui, R., Sutcu, F. (2014). Out‐of‐plane stability of buckling‐restrained braces including moment transfer capacity. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 43(6), 851-869. 41. Takeuchi, T., Hajjar, J. F., Matsui, R., Nishimoto, K., Aiken, I. D. (2010). Local buckling restraint condition for core plates in buckling restrained braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(2), 139-149. 42. Tsai, K. C., Hsiao, P. C. (2008). Pseudo‐dynamic test of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame- Part II: Seismic performance of buckling‐restrained braces and connections. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 37(7), 1099-1115. 43. Tsai, K. C., Hwang, Y. C., Weng, C. S., Shirai, T., Nakamura, H. (2002, December). Experimental tests of large scale buckling restrained braces and frames. In Proceedings, Passive Control Symposium. 44. Thornton, W. A. (1984). Bracing connections for heavy construction. Engineering Journal, 21(3), 139-148. 45. Uang, C. M., Nakashima, M. (2003). Steel buckling-restrained braced frames. Chapter 16 in Earthquake Engineering: Recent Advances and Applications. 46. Usami, T., Ge, H. B., Kasai, A. (2008). Overall buckling prevention condition of buckling-restrained braces as a structural control damper. Proceeding of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China. 47. Watanabe, A., Hitomi, Y., Saeki, E., Wada, A., Fujimoto, M. (1988). Properties of brace encased in buckling-restraining concrete and steel tube. Proceedings of the ninth world conference on earthquake engineering, 719-724. 48. Wigle, V. R., Fahnestock, L. A. (2010). Buckling-restrained braced frame connection performance. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(1), 65-74. 49. Xu, W., Pantelides, C. P. (2017). Strong axis and weak axis buckling and local bulging of buckling-restrained braces with prismatic core plates. Engineering Structures, 153, 279-289. 50. Zamani, S. M., Vafai, A., Aghakouchak, A. A., Kazemi, M. T. (2012). Experimental investigation of steel frames with single bays of symmetrical-shaped concentric bracings. Scientia Iranica, 19(2), 195-210. 51. Zhao, J., Wu, B., Li, W., Ou, J. (2014). Local buckling behavior of steel angle core members in buckling-restrained braces: cyclic tests, theoretical analysis, and design recommendations. Engineering Structures, 66, 129-145. 52. 周中哲,鍾秉庭,范廷海,鄭宇岑,陳映全 (2014)「夾型挫屈束制斜撐及雙核心自復位斜撐減震技術發展與應用」,減震技術通訊,第一期,15-20頁,中國(in Chinese)。 53. 周中哲,陳映全, 范廷海, 鍾秉庭,張武明(2014)「鋼造雙核心自復位斜撐實驗分析與韌性斜撐構架之動力歷時行為」結構工程,第二十九卷,第三期,81-104頁(in Chinese)。 54. 周中哲,蕭佳宏,陳澤邦,鍾秉庭,范廷海(2017)「全尺寸二層樓雙核心自復位斜撐構架與夾型挫屈束制斜撐構架之耐震試驗與非線性動力歷時分析」,結構工程,第三十二卷,第二期,35-64頁(in Chinese)。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70938 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This work presents testing and finite element analysis of a two-story, buckling-restrained braced frame (BRBF) with X bracing, called X-BRBF. The BRB in this work is composed of a core plate sandwiched by a pair of restraining members, called a sandwiched buckling restrained brace (SBRB). The weak axis of the SBRB core was transverse to the dual-gusset plate connection and the in-plane movement of the frame to eliminate its weak axis buckling. The objectives of two-phase tests were to evaluate: (1) the seismic performance of SBRBs with a small width-to-thickness ratio of the core plate (=3), (2) the effects of free-edge stiffeners on the gusset and SBRB stability, and (3) the SBRB stability associated with beam buckling. All gusset connections had free-edge stiffeners in the Phase 1 test, and free-edge stiffeners were removed from half of the gusset connections in the Phase 2 test. The X-BRBF in the Phase 1 test exhibited good performance up to a second-floor drift of 1.6%, but in Phase 2 test the second-floor SBRB, caused by the lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) of the beam, experienced asymmetric buckling about the strong axis of the core at 1.6% second-floor drift. The other SBRB with no beam LTB showed one-side buckling about the strong axis at a 2% drift. However, the strength degradation of the specimen was not observed during the strong axis instability of SBRBs, indicating acceptable orientation for excluding the weak axis buckling of SBRBs. The strong axis instability of SBRBs in the Phase 2 test could be evaluated by using the stability concept with the measured out-of-plane deformation of gusset plates. Non-linear finite element analysis was also conducted on the specimen for further investigation of SBRB instability. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:44:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2008202006483000.pdf: 13615600 bytes, checksum: 4abda65deceb40214796dc25b4357800 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ABSTRACT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Objectives 3 1.3 Research Methodology 5 1.4 Organized of the Dissertation 6 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Review buckling of BRB. 7 2.2.1 Overall buckling of BRB. 7 2.2.2 Global buckling due to plastic hinge form at the BRB or gusset plate ends. 8 2.2.3 High-mode buckling of the core plate 10 2.3 Gusset plate buckling design method 12 2.3.1 Brace action force (AISC method ) 12 2.3.2 Frame action force method 13 2.3.3 Gusset plate with rotational stiffness. 14 CHAPTER 3 DESIGN OF A THREE-STORY X-BRBF 15 3.1 Description of Structure 15 3.2 Seismic Loading 15 3.3 Design Sandwiched Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame 17 3.4 Beam and Column Design 18 3.4.1 Width-to-thickness ratio 18 3.4.2 Axial Compression Capacity (AISC LRFD Section 16, Chapter E) 19 3.4.3 Bending Capacity (AISC LRFD Section 16, Chapter F) 19 3.4.4 Bending-Axial Interaction (AISC LRFD section 16, Chapter H) 20 3.5 Design story drift 20 3.6 Nonlinear Push Over Analysis 21 3.7 Gusset Connection Design 22 3.8 Time-history dynamic analysis 25 3.9 Loma Pretia_HCH090 response 26 CHAPTER 4 X-BRBF EXPERIMENTAL SET UP 28 4.1 Introduction 28 4.2 NCREE Facility Description. 28 4.3 Frame test Specimen Description 29 4.4 Instrumentation 30 4.5 Two phases test 31 4.5.1 Phase 1 test 31 4.5.2 Phase 2 test 31 4.5.3 Gusset Crippling 32 4.6 SBRB stability 34 4.7 Test Results 36 CHAPTER 5 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TWO-STORY X-BRBF SUBASSEMBLY. 38 5.1 Introduction Finite Element Model. 38 5.2 Description of the FE Model. 39 5.3 SBRB model 40 5.4 BRB material modeling and calibration 42 5.5 FE Model Boundary Conditions and Loading Protocol. 44 5.6 Mesh Density Sensitivity Analysis 45 5.7 Finite Element Solver 46 5.8 Comparison between Finite Element Analysis and Test. 47 CHAPTER 6 STABILITY OF SANDWICHED BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACES 49 6.1 Introduction 49 6.2 Buckling Stability Concept and Limit (Takeuchi method) 50 6.2.1 (Takeuchi et al. 2014) method 50 6.2.2 (Takeuchi et al. 2016) method 52 6.3 Stability of Sandwiched Buckling-Restrained Braces 53 6.3.1 Strong axis and weak axis buckling of SBRB 53 6.3.2 Elastic buckling strength of SBRB. 54 6.3.4 Rotational stiffness of the beam. 56 6.3.5 Bending stiffness of the restraining member. 56 6.3.6 Imperfection of SBRB 57 6.3.7 Connection zone strength. 58 6.3.8 Moment transfer capacity at the restraining member ends 58 6.3.9 Strong axis and weak axis buckling of SBRB 59 6.3.10 Effects of free-edge stiffeners on SBRB stability. 60 CHAPTER 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 62 7.1 General Remarks 62 7.2 The following conclusions were summarized below. 63 7.3 Recommendation for further study 66 REFERENCES 67 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 全尺寸兩層鋼構架之夾型挫屈束制斜撐穩定性研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Stability of Sandwiched Buckling Restrained Braces in a Full-Scale, Two-Story Steel Frame | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡克銓,張國鎮 ,黃尹男,許協隆(Hsieh-Lung Hsu),陳誠直 | |
dc.subject.keyword | X-BRBF,SBRB,Cyclic Test,Strong Axis Buckling,Finite Element Analyses, | en |
dc.relation.page | 147 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202004120 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-2008202006483000.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 13.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。