Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 環境工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70533
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor駱尚廉(Shang-Ling LO)
dc.contributor.authorChun-Yi Lien
dc.contributor.author李淳毅zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T04:30:24Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-15
dc.date.copyright2018-08-15
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-08-13
dc.identifier.citation中文文獻
1. 李育輯,以微波活化過硫酸鹽破壞去除水中全氟辛酸之研究(博士論文),國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所 (2010)。
2. 吳怡君,以過碘酸鹽結合超音波系統提升全氟辛酸降解之研究(碩士論文),國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所(2013)。
3. 林若蓁(2015),硫酸根離子及界面活性劑輔助超音波去除水中全氟辛酸之影響(碩士論文),國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所。
4. 陳又楚,酸淋洗及二段式奈米薄膜於污泥灰渣之磷回收(碩士論文),國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所 (2013)。
英文文獻
5. Agbekodo, K. M., Legube, B., & Dard, S. (1996). Atrazine and simazine removal mechanisms by nanofiltration: influence of natural organic matter concentration,
Water Res, 30, 2535–2542.
6. Agenson, K. O., J. Oh, & Urase, T. (1998). Retention of a wide variety of organic pollutants by different nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes: controlling parameters of process. Water Res, 32, 3527–3538.
7. Appleman, T. D., Dickenson, V., E. R., Bellona, C., & Higgins, C. P. (2013). Nanofiltration and granular activated carbon treatment of perfluoroalkyl acids. J. Hazard. Mater., 260, 740–746.
8. Baudequin, C., Mai, Z. H., Rakib, M., Deguerry, I., Severac, R., Pabon, M., & Couallier, E. (2014). Removal of fluorinated surfactants by reverse osmosis – role of surfactants in membrane fouling, J. Membr. Sci, 458, 111–119.
9. Belkhouchea, N. E., Mohamed, A. D., Tahab, S., & Farèsb, N. B. (2009). Zinc rejection from leachate solutions of industrial solid waste — effects of pressure and concentration on nanofiltrationmembrane performance,Desalination, 239, 58–65
10. Bellona, C., Drewes, J. E., Xua, P., & Amy, G. (2004). Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment- a literature review. Water Research, 38, 2795–2809.
11. Bernat, X., Fortuny A., Stüber, F., Bengoa, C., Fabregat, A., & Font, J. (2008) Recovery of iron (III) from aqueous streams by ultrafiltration, Desalination ,221, 413–418
12. Braeken, L., Bettens, B., Boussu, K., Van der Meeren, P., Cocquyt, J., Vermant,J., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2006). Transport mechanisms of dissolved organic compounds in aqueous solution during nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 279, 311–319.
13. Cassano, A., Pietra, L. D., & Drioli, E. (2007). Integrated Membrane Process for the Recovery of Chromium Salts from Tannery Effluents. Ind. Eng., Chem. Res., 46, 6825-6830.
14. Chuyang Y .Tang , Q. Shiang F U , A. P. Roberston ,Craing S. Criddle, & Leckie J. O. (2006). Use of Reverse Osmosis Membranes to Remove Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) from Semiconductor Wastewater.Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 7343-7349.
15. Darling, E., & Reinhard, M. (2008). Nanofiltration for Trace Organic Contaminant Removal: Structure, Solution, and Membrane Fouling Effects on the Rejection of Perfluorochemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 5292–5297.
16. Flores C., Ventura, F., Jordi, M. A., & Caixach, J. (2013). Occurrence of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in NE Spanish surface waters and their removal in a drinking water treatment plant that combines conventional and advanced treatments in parallel lines. Sci. Total Environ., 461, 618–626.
17. Garba, Y., Taha, S., Gondrexon, N., & Dorange, G. (1999). Ion transport modelling through nanofltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 160,187-200.
18. Hang, X. F., Chen, X. G., Luo, J. Q., Cao, W. F., & Wan, Y. H., (2015).Removal and recovery of perfluorooctanoate from wastewater by nanofiltration. Separation and Purification Technology, 145, 120–129.
19. Herzke, D., Olsson, E., & Posner, S. (2012). Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in consumer products in NorwayeA pilot study. Chemosphere 88, 980-987
20. Hori, H., Yamamamoto, A., Hayakawa, E., Taniyasu, S., Yamashita, N., Kutsuna, S., Kiatagawa, H., Arakawa, R., (2005). Efficient decomposition of environmentally persistent perfluorocarboxylic acids by use of persulfate as a pfotochemical oxidant. Environ. Sci. Technol,39 (7), 2383-2388.
21. Kannan, K., Corsolini, S., Falandysz, J., Fillmann, G., Kumar, K.S., Loganathan, B.G., Mohd, M.A., Olivero, J., Wouwe, N.V., &Yang, J. H. (2004). Perfluoroocta nesulfonateand related fluorochemicals in human blood from several countries. Environ.Sci. Technol., 38, 4489-4495
22. Kargol, A. (2001). A mechanistic model of transport processes in porous membranes generated by osmotic and hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Membrane Science, 191, 61–69
23. Kimura, K., Amy, G.L., Drewes, J.E., & Heberer, T. (2003) .Rejection of organic micropollutants (disinfection by-products, endocrine disrupting compounds, and pharmaceutically active compounds) by NF/RO membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 227, 113–121.
24. Kiso, Y., Sugiura, Y., Kitao, T., Nishimura, K. (2001). Effects of hydrophobicity and molecular size on rejection of aromatic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 192, 1–10
25. Kwon, Y. N., Shih, K., Tang, C., Leckie, J. O. (2011). Adsorption of Perfluorinated Compounds on Thin-Film Composite Polyamide Membranes. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 124, 1042-1049.
26. Lin, Y., Chiang, P., & Chang, E. E. (2006).Reduction of disinfection by-products precursors by nanofiltration process, J. Hazard. Mater., B137, 324–331.
27. Mika M., Arto, P., & Marianne, N. (2006). Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH. Journal of Membrane Science, 280, 311–320.
28. Moriwaki, H., Takagi, Y., Tanaka, M., Tsuruho, K., Okitsu, K., & Maeda, Y. (2005). Sonochemical decomposition of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(9), 3388-3392.
29. Ochiai, T., Iizuka, Y., Nakata, K., Murakami, T., Tryk, D. A., Fujishima, A., Koide, Y., & Morito, Y., (2011). Efficient electrochemical decomposition of perfluorocarboxylic acids by the use of a boron-doped diamond electrode, Diam. Relat. Mater, 20, 64-67.
30. Ochoa-Herrera, V., & Sierra-Alvarez, R., (2008). Removal of perfluorinated surfacants by sorption onto granular activated carbon, zeolite and sludge. Chemosphere, 72 (10).
31. Post, G. B., Cohn, P. D., & Cooper, K. R., (2012). Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), an emerging drinking water contaminant: a critical review of recent literature. Environ. Res., 116, 93–117.
32. Prevedouros, K., Cousins, I.T., Buck, R.C., &Korzeniowski, S.H., (2006). Sources, fate and transport of perfluorocarboxylates. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 32-44.
33. Rahman, M.F., Peldszus, S., & Anderson, W.B.( 2014). Behaviour and fate of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in drinking water treatment:a review. Water Res., 50, 318-340.
34. Schultz, M. M., Barofsky, D.F., & Field, J. A. (2006). Quantitative determination of Fluorinated alkyl substances by large-volume-injection liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry - Characterization of municipal wastewaters. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40 (1), 289–295.
35. Sinclair, E., & Kannan, K. (2006). Mass loading and fate of perfluoroalkyl surfactants in wastewater treatment plants. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40 (5), 1408–1414.
36. Singer, P. C. (1999). Formation and Control of Disinfection By-products in Drinking Water, AWWA, Denver, CO.
37. Steenland, K., Fletcher, T., & Savitz, D. A. (2010). Epidemiologic evidence on the health effects of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA).Environ. Health Perspect, 118, 11 00–1108.
38. Steinle-Darling, E., & Reinhard, M. (2008).Nanofiltration for trace organic contaminant removal: structure, solution, and membrane fouling effects on the rejection of perfluorochemicals, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 5292–5297.
39. Tang, C., & Chen, V. (2002). Nanofiltration of textile wastewater for water reuse, Desalination, 143, 1 l-20
40. Tang, C. Y., FU, Q. S., Roberston, A. P., Criddle,C.S., & Leckie, J. O., (2006). Use of Reverse Osmosis Membranes to Remove Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) from Semiconductor Wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol, 40, 7343-7349.
41. Tang, C. Y., FU, Q. S., Roberston, A. P., Criddle,C.S., & Leckie, J. O., (2007). Effect of Flux (Transmembrane Pressure) and Membrane Properties on Fouling and Rejection of Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes Treating Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Containing Wastewater, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 2008-2014.
42. Thompson, J., Eaglesham, G., Reungoat, J., Poussade, Y., Bartkow, M., Lawrence M., & Mueller, J. F. (2011). Removal of PFOS, PFOA and other perfluoroalkyl acids at water reclamation plants in South East Queensland Australia, Chemosphere, 82, 9–17.
43. Uyaka, V., Koyuncu, I., Oktem, I., Cakmakci, M., & Toroz, I. (2008). Removal of trihalomethanes from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152, 789–794.
44. Van der Bruggen, B., Schaep, J., Wilms, D., Vandecasteele, C (1999). Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 156, 29-41.
45. Wijmans, J. G., & Baker, R. W., (1995). The solution-diffusion model: a review. Journal of membrane science, 107, 1-21.
46. Xiao, F., Simcik, M. F., & Gulliver, J. S., (2013). Removal of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanate (PFOA) from drinking water by conventional and enhanced coagulation. Water Res., 47, 49-56.
47. Young, Cora J., Vasile I. Furdui, James Franklin, Roy M. Koerner, Derek C.G., Muir ,& Scott A. Mabury (2007). 'Perfluorinated acids in arctic snow: New evidence for atmospheric formation.' Environmental Science & Technology, 41(10), 3455-3461.
48. Zeng, C., Tanaka, S., Suzuki, Y., & Fujii, S. (2017). Impact of feed water pH and membrane material on nanofiltr ation of perfluorohexanoic acid in aqueous solution. Chemosphere, 183, 599-604.
電子書
49. Lyonnaise des eaux (1996). Water Treatment Membrane Processes. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=vW8ZUzbTKg0C&pg=SA5-PA10&lpg=SA5-PA10&dq=preferential+adsorption+capillary+flow+model+%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87&source=bl&ots=HeipjqJnmS&sig=glNukalLrlifjJt-YvpOHB07FvM&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiuxLSS9qLbAhUIsJQKHdKgBF4Q6AEIMjAB#v=onepage&q=preferential%20adsorption%20capillary%20flow%20model%20%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87&f=false
50. Mulder, J. (1991). Basic principles of membrane technology . Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=y2_wCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA519&lpg=PA519&dq=Basic+principles+of+membrane+technology,+Dordrecht,+Netherlands&source=bl&ots=X7d2kdXhEL&sig=-6AR_WYz4uL3zT6eZeUcT-2z_6Q&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiroOGk-bnbAhXEJZQKHUZ0AOkQ6AEIWTAH#v=onepage&q=Basic%20principles%20of%20membrane%20technology%2C%20Dordrecht%2C%20Netherlands&f=false
網站
51. Merck: http://www.merckmillipore.com/TW/zh
52. 中華民國環境保護署: https://pops.epa.gov.tw/DXN_Instruction/ap1/Pollute1.aspx
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70533-
dc.description.abstract全氟羧酸(perfluorocarboxylic acids, PFCAs)為工業上廣受應用之物質,惟被證實具毒性、持久性與生物累積性,對環境與人體健康均有危害。因此,許多研究致力於尋找成本合理且技術有效之處理方式以去除之。其中,薄膜過濾為一分離程序,未將物質破壞與降解,而能使其純化與濃縮,並回收再利用於製程中。當中,又以奈米過濾較超過濾有較高之截留成效,且其有較佳之通量而較逆滲透節能,故被視為去除與回收PFCAs的前瞻性技術之一。操作條件改變可以影響奈米過濾之成效,其中進流pH及掃留速度能影響奈米薄膜與溶質間電荷互動,進而影響兩者間電荷排斥作用,此排斥作用為主導奈米過濾去除帶電有機溶質之機制。為了優化奈米過濾之成效,探討能影響電荷排斥作用之操作條件為重要之課題。

本研究進行兩種商業化奈米薄膜(NF 90與NF 270)對兩種PFCAs水溶液(PFOA與PFHxA)之掃流式過濾試驗。奈米薄膜之滲透液通量及PFCAs截留率為衡量過濾成效之參數。探討進流pH與操作壓力對過濾成效之影響;掃留速度對NF 270;相同奈米薄膜之PFOA與PFHxA截留率。

研究結果顯示,進流pH提升至7.0及10.0時,NF 90與NF 270之滲透液通量會分別增加,並可以減少薄膜表面附近濃度極化與吸附積垢;PFOA 與PFHxA之截留率亦增加,表示提升進流pH可以強化NF 90與NF 270之截留成效。操作壓力與PFOA、PFHxA截留率及PFOA、PFHxA溶質通量無特定之關係。NF薄膜之滲透液通量隨操作壓力增加而增加,可能非因PFOA與PFHxA溶質通量受操作壓力之影響,而為溶劑通量(即水通量) 隨操作壓力增加而增加所致,惟其增加量較純水過濾時之情況要少。掃流速度由0.28 m/s提升至0.79 m/s時,濃度極化與吸附積垢幾乎不再存在,使得在三種進流pH測試條件下,NF 270對PFOA之截留率皆顯著地減少,推論適度之濃度極化與積垢可能可以改變薄膜表面之電荷特性,進而影響薄膜與溶質間之電荷互動,故對NF 270截流PFOA有幫助。

由過濾試驗之比較結果發現,NF 270與NF 90因薄膜材料特性之不同,而對進流pH之變化具不同之敏感度,造成不同之PFOA與PFHxA截留率。NF 90具明顯較高之PFHxA截留率,實際應用之可能性較高;而NF 270之滲透液通量與NF 270之PFOA截留率對進流pH之敏感度較高,在進流pH 10.0時,NF 270之PFOA截留率已相當接近NF 90者。NF 90與NF 270對PFOA之截留率皆較PFHxA者高,表示分子尺寸可以影響PFCAs 之截留率,且除了電荷排斥作用外,機械篩分亦為重要之截留機制。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPerfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) which were widely used in industries were found to be toxic, persistent and bioacccumulative and had negative effect on environment and human health. Therefore, many research attempted to search the cost-effective techniques which can remove PFCAs. Among those treatments, membrane filtration is a physical separation process in which the materials can be purified, concentrated and recovered back to the industrial process, than a process which destroys and decomposes the target materials. Nanofiltration offers higher flux than reverse osmosis (RO) and better rejection performance than ultrationfiltration (UF). Therefore, nanofiltration is considered as an alternative promising technology for removal and recovery of PFCAs from wastewater. The operation conditions could have an effect on the performance of nanofiltration. The influent pH and crossflow velocity could affect the electrostatic interaction between NF membranes and solutes , and have an effect on the performance of nanofiltration. The electrostatic repulsion is the dominant mechanism which can remove the PFCAs. In order to optimize the performance of nanofiltration, the investigation of the factors which could affect the electrostatic repulsion is the key goal.

In this study, the crossflow filtration tests of two kinds of PFCAs (PFOA and PFHxA) in aqueous solution by two types of commercial NF membrane (NF 270 and NF 90) were conducted. The permeate flux of NF membrane and the rejection rates of PFCAs were the parameters for the filtration performance. The effects of influent pH and transmembrane pressure on the filtration performance were investigated. The effects of crossflow velocity on the filtration performance of PFOA by NF 270 were tested. The filtration performance of the same PFCAs by NF 90, NF 270 and the rejection rates of PFOA, PFHxA by the same NF membrane were compared, respectively.

The experimental results showed that the permeate flux of NF 90 and NF 270 increased, respectively, and the concentration polarization near the membrane surface and the adsorption fouling of membrane were mitigated when the influent pH was adjusted to 7.0 and 10.0. The rejection rates of PFOA and PFHxA by NF membrane also increased, respectively. Thus, increasing influent pH could enhance the rejection performance of NF 90 and NF 270. The rejection rates of PFOA, PFHxA and the PFOA, PFHxA solute flux are independent of transmembrane pressure, respectively. The permeate flux of NF membrane increased with increasing transmembrane pressure could not result from the effect of transmembrane pressure on the PFOA and PFHxA solute, but as a result of the increasing solvent flux (i.e. water fux) with increasing transmembrane pressure. However, the solvent flux increased less than the situation of pure water filtration. The absence of the concentration polarization near the membrane surface and the adsorption fouling of membrane when the crossflow velocity increased from 0.28 m/s to 0.79 m/s caused that the rejection rates of PFOA reduced significantly at three different influent pH conditions tested. Therefore, moderate concentration polarization and membrane fouling could change the charge characteristics of membrane surface and the interaction between membrane and solute, and might be helpful for the rejection of PFCAs by nanofiltration.

The comparison of experimental results obtained from the filtration tests demonstrated that NF 270 and NF 90 showed different response to the change of influent pH because of the different properties of membrane material. Thus, they offered the different rejection rates of PFOA and PFHxA. NF 90 offered higher rejection rate of PFHxA. Therefore, it had higher probability to use in practical engineering. The permeate flux of NF 270 and its PFOA rejection rates were more sensitive to the influent pH. Therefore, the rejection rate of PFOA by NF 270 was comparable to that by NF 90 at influent pH 10.0. The rejection rates of PFOA were higher than those of PFHxA by both NF 270 and NF 90. Thus, the molecular size could affect the rejection of PFCAs, and mechanical sieving was the important removal mechanism besides charge exclusion for PFCAs.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:30:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R05541132-1.pdf: 2704490 bytes, checksum: 7c86f12bde9ee16e473040e37bfd6643 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 I
摘要 II
Abstract IV
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目標 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
2.1全氟或多氟烷基物質 4
2.1.1 PFASs種類 4
2.1.2 PFASs危害特性 5
2.1.3 PFASs環境暴露途徑與傳輸途徑 6
2.1.4 PFASs處理方法 7
2.2 薄膜過濾 9
2.2.1薄膜過濾之應用 9
2.2.2 溶質在薄膜過濾程序中傳輸機制與傳輸模式 10
2.2.3 NF/RO分離機制 19
2.2.4 影響NF/RO去除有機物溶質截留率之因子 20
第三章 實驗材料與方法 28
3.1 實驗藥劑與材料 28
3.1.1 實驗藥劑 28
3.1.2 實驗設備 29
3.2 研究設計 31
3.2.1 實驗設置 31
3.2.2 實驗設計 32
3.2.3 實驗參數 35
3.3 分析方法 36
3.3.1 應用於分析之藥品 36
3.3.2 樣品分析 36
第四章 結果與討論 38
4.1 溫度與純水過濾濾程之純水通量試驗結果 38
4.1.1 溫度對NF 270純水通量之影響 38
4.1.2 純水過濾濾程對NF 270透水係數之影響 39
4.2 電荷對NF薄膜滲透液通量之影響 40
4.2.1 進流pH在PFOA過濾試驗中對NF薄膜滲透液通量之影響 40
4.2.2 掃流速度在PFOA過濾試驗中對NF 270滲透液通量之影響 45
4.2.3 pH在PFHxA過濾試驗中對NF薄膜滲透液通量之影響 47
4.3 電荷對全氟羧酸截留率之影響 50
4.3.1 pH對PFOA截留率之影響 50
4.3.2 NF 90及NF 270去除PFOA截留率之比較 54
4.3.3 pH對PFHxA截留率之影響 58
4.3.4 NF 90及NF 270去除PFHxA截留率之比較 60
4.3.5 掃流速度對NF 270去除PFOA截留率之影響 61
4.4 相同NF薄膜之PFOA與PFHxA截留率比較 64
4.5 操作壓力對奈米過濾全氟羧酸成效之影響 67
第五章 結論與建議 69
5.1 結論 69
5.2 建議 71
參考文獻 73
附錄 80
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject電荷zh_TW
dc.subject奈米過濾zh_TW
dc.subject薄膜過濾zh_TW
dc.subject進流 pHzh_TW
dc.subject全氟羧酸zh_TW
dc.subjectmembrane filtrationen
dc.subjectnanafiltrationen
dc.subjectperfluorocarboxylic acidsen
dc.subjectchargeen
dc.subjectfeed water pHen
dc.title電荷對奈米過濾去除水溶液中全氟羧酸之影響zh_TW
dc.titleEffect of Charge on Removal of Perfluorocarboxylic Acids in Aqueous Solution by Nanofiltrationen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee劉雅瑄(Ya-Hsuan Liou),湖景堯(Ching-Yao Hu)
dc.subject.keyword奈米過濾,薄膜過濾,進流 pH,電荷,全氟羧酸,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordnanafiltration,membrane filtration,feed water pH,charge,perfluorocarboxylic acids,en
dc.relation.page87
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201802530
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-08-13
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept環境工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:環境工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.64 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved