請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70340
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳雅鳳(Ya-feng Wu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ying-jie Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳英傑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T04:26:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Agamben, Giorgio. The Fire and the Tale. Trans. Lorenzo Chiesa. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2017. Print.
---. Nymphs. Trans. Amanda Minervini. London: Seagull, 2013. Print. ---. Stanzas: Word and Phantasm in Western Culture. Trans. Ronald L. Martinez. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993. Print. Aske, Martin. Keats and Hellenism: An Essay. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. Print. Bayley, John. “John Keats and the Genius of Parody.” Essays in Criticism 43.2 (1993): 112-122. Print. Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. Ed. Hannah Arendt. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, 1968. Print. Bewell, Alan J. “The Political Implication of Keats's Classicist Aesthetics.” Studies in Romanticism 25.2 (1986): 220-229. Print. Bloom, Harold. “The Internalization of Quest-Romance.” Romanticism and Consciousness: Essays in Criticism. New York: Norton, 1970. 3-24. Print. ---.The Visionary Company: A Reading of English Romantic Poetry. Garden City: Doubleday, 1961. Print. Burke, Kenneth. “Symbolic Action in a Poem by Keats.” A Grammar of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1945. 447-463. Print. Butler, Marilyn. Romantics, Rebels and Reactionaries: English Literature and Its Background, 1760-1830. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1985. Print. Chandler, James. England in 1819: The Politics of Literary Culture and the Case of Romantic Historicism. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 1998. Print. Clarke, Bruce. Allegories of Writing: The Subject of Metamorphosis. Albany: State U of New York P, 1995. Print. Coker, William. “Keats, Hegel, and Belated Mythography.” Comparative Literature 67.1 (2015): 45-61. Print. Cole, Andrew. The Birth of Theory. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 2014. Print. Cox, Jeffrey N., ed. Keats’s Poetry and Prose. New York: Norton, 2009. Print. Daniel, Drew. The Melancholy Assemblage: Affect and Epistemology in the English Renaissance. New York: Fordham UP, 2013. Eagleton, Terry. The Event of Literature. New Haven: Yale UP, 2012. Print. ---. Sweet Violence: The Idea of the Tragic. Malden: Blackwell, 2003. Print. Elfenbein, Andrew. “William Beckford and the Genius of Consumption.” Romantic Genius: The Prehistory of a Homosexual Role. New York: Columbia UP, 1999. 39-62. Print. Ferris, David S. Silent Urns: Romanticism, Hellenism, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2000. Print. Fry, Paul H. “History, Existence, and ‘To Autumn.’” Studies in Romanticism 25.2 (1986): 211-219. Print. Frye, Northrop. “A Study of English Romanticism.” 1968. Northrop Frye’s Writings on The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Ed. Imre Salunsinszky. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2005. 92-205. Print. Gay, Peter. Why the Romantics Matter. New Haven: Yale UP, 2015. Print. Gigante, Denise. “Keats’s Nausea.” Studies in Romanticism 40.4 (2001): 481-510. Print. ---. Life: Organic Form and Romanticism. New Haven: Yale UP, 2009. Print. ---. “The Endgame of Taste: Keats, Sartre, Beckett.” Cultures of Taste/Theories of Appetite. Ed. Timothy Morton. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. 183-202. Print. Gittings, Robert, ed. Letters of John Keats. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1970. Print. Hägglund, Martin. Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2008. Print. Hamilton, Paul. Metaromanticism: Aesthetics, Literature, Theory. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 2003. Print. Hazlitt, William. “On Londeners and Country People.” The Selected Writings of William Hazlitt. Vol. 8. Ed. Duncan Wu. London: Pickering & Chatto, 1998. 61-70. Print. Jackson, Noel. Science and Sensation in Romantic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. Print. ---. “The Time of Beauty.” Studies in Romanticism 50.2 (2011): 311-334. Print. Jameson, Fredric. “Criticism in History.” The Ideologies of Theory. London: Verso, 2008. 125-144. Print. ---. “Imaginary and Symbolic in Lacan.” The Ideologies of Theory. London: Verso, 2008. 77-124. Print. ---. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. 1981. London: Routledge, 2002. Print. ---. A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present. London: Verso, 2002. Print. ---. “Symbolic Inference; or, Kenneth Burke and Ideological Analysis.” The Ideologies of Theory. London: Verso, 2008. 144-160. Print. Kaufman, Robert. “Negatively Capable Dialectics: Keats, Vendler, Adorno, and the Theory of the Avant-Garde.” Critical Inquiry 27.2 (2001): 354-384. Print. Kelley, Theresa M. Reinventing Allegory. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. Kermode, Frank. Romantic Image. 1957. London: Routledge, 2002. Print. Kristeva, Julia. “The Adolescent Novel.” Abjection, Melancholia, and Love: The Work of Julia Kristeva. Eds. John Fletcher, Andrew Benjamin. London: Routledge, 2012. 8-23. Print. Kucich, Greg. Keats, Shelley, and Romantic Spenserianism. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1991. Print. Levinson, Marjorie. Keats’s Life of Allegory: The Origins of a Style. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988. Print. ---. “Reflections on the New Historicism.” European Romantic Review 23.3 (2012): 355-362. Print. ---. “What is New Formalism?” PMLA 122.2 (2007): 558-569. Print. McGann, Jerome J. The Beauty of Inflections: Literary Investigations in Historical Method and Theory. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985. Print. ---. The Point Is to Change It: Poetry and Criticism in the Continuing Present. Tuscaloosa: The U of Alabama P, 2007. Print. ---. The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 1983. Print. McGrath, Brian. “Keats for Beginners.” Studies in Romanticism 50.2 (2011): 351-372. Print. ---. The Poetics of Unremembered Acts: Reading, Lyric, Pedagogy. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2013. Print. Mellor, Anne K. English Romantic Irony. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1980. Print. Mulrooney, Jonathan. “How Keats Falls.” Studies in Romanticism 50.2 (2011): 251-273. Print. Murry, John Middleton. Studies in Keats, New and Old. London: Oxford UP, 1939. Print. Parker, Patricia A. Inescapable Romance: Studies in the Poetics of a Mode. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1979. Print. Pickstock, Catherine. Repetition and Identity. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013. Print. Pfau, Thomas. Romantic Moods: Paranoia, Trauma, and Melancholy, 1790-1840. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 2005. Print. Pyle, Forest. “Keats’s Materialism.” Studies in Romanticism 33.1 (1994): 57-80. Print. ---. “Kindling and Ash: Radical Aestheticism in Keats and Shelley.” Studies in Romanticism 42.4 (2003): 427-459. Print. Rajan, Tilottama. Dark Interpreter: The Discourse of Romanticism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1980. Print. ---. Deconstruction and the Remainders of Phenomenology: Sartre, Derrida, Foucault, Baudrillard. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2002. Print. ---. “Keats, Poetry, and ‘The Absence of the Work.’” Modern Philology 95.3 (1998): 334-351. Print. Rancière, Jacques. “The Politics of the Spider.” Studies in Romanticism 50.2 (2011): 239-250. Print. Redfield, Marc. Theory at Yale: The Strange Case of Deconstruction in America. New York: Fordham UP, 2016. Print. Ricks, Christopher. Keats and Embarrassment. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1974. Print. Rovee, Christopher. “Trashing Keats.” ELH 75.4 (2008): 993-1022. Print. Ryan, Robert M. The Romantic Reformation: Religious Politics in English Literature, 1789-1824. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. Print. Rzepka, Charles J. “‘Cortez—or Balboa, or Somebody Like That’: Form, Fact and Forgetting in Keats’s ‘Chapman’s Homer’ Sonnet.” Selected Studies in Romantic and American Literature, History, and Culture: Inventions and Interventions. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010. 223-250. Print. Said, Edward W. Beginnings: Intention and Method. New York: Basic Books, 1975. Print. Sartre, Jean-Paul. What is Literature? Trans. Bernard Frechtman. 1993. Abingdon: Routledge, 2001. Print. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Robert S. Miola. New York: Norton, 2010. Print. Simpson, David. Irony and Authority in Romantic Poetry. London: Macmillan, 1979. Print. Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. Poetic Closure: A Study of How Poems End. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1968. Print. Stiegler, Bernard. What Makes Life Worth Living: On Pharmacology. Trans. Daniel Ross. Cambridge: Polity, 2013. Print. Sun, Emily. “Facing Keats with Winnicott: On a New Therapeutics of Poetry.” Studies in Romanticism 46.1 (2007): 57-75. Print. Terada, Rei. “Looking at the Stars Forever.” Studies in Romanticism 50.2 (2011): 275-309. Print. Wang, Orrin N. C. “Coming Attractions: ‘Lamia’ and Cinematic Sensation.” Studies in Romanticism 42.4 (2003): 461-500. Print. White, R. S. “Keats, Mourning and Melancholia.” John Keats and the Medical Imagination. Ed. Nicholas Roe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 129-152. Print. Wolfson, Susan J. Reading John Keats. Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 2015. Print. ---. “Romanticism & Gender & Melancholy.” Studies in Romanticism 53.3 (2014): 435-456. Print. Žižek, Slavoj. “Neighbors and Other Monsters: A Plea for Ethical Violence.” The Neighbor: Three Inquiries in Political Theology. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 2005. Print. ---. The Sublime Object of Ideology. 1989. London: Verso, 2009. Print. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70340 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文討論英國浪漫主義詩人濟慈敘事詩中的烏托邦欲望,將取材自神話的諸作品視為對社會歷史情境的回應,並嘗試論證,濟慈的文學抱負實屬第二代英國浪漫主義者,即使經歷拿破崙戰爭所致的幻滅,仍試圖改造世界的革命理想。濟慈創作神話敘事詩的歷程,本文名之「神話詩學」,此想像彷彿脫離塵世,實際上卻幽微地與普羅米修斯神話對應,體現了一個奮力為俗世帶來文明的靈魂及精神。
本文第一章討論《恩迪密昂》。濟慈自承此詩受到少不更事與天真爛漫所累,然而烏托邦衝動在此作可謂昭然若揭。最特殊者,乃同名主角在追尋女神之途中,感受到時間之脆弱:恩迪密昂在夢中急切擁抱女神,顯示他受困於當下之時間,敘事的大團圓結尾相形之下反而顯得勉強、造作。詩作中受困當下之感,與濟慈在書信中流露對生命苦痛的敏感遙相呼應。但正是因此對生命當下的悲劇性體會,才能真正投射出對未來的希望。 第二章接續討論《海柏利昂》。透過詩作中諸神之憂鬱,詩人表達對進步史觀的疑慮。而詩人原本有意模擬史詩,卻基於這些疑慮,令其保持片斷形式,進而創作另一詩《海柏利昂的敗亡》。在靈視中,該作的說話者墮入生也有涯的憂思,透露濟慈關於群體歷史的烏托邦幻想,已獲得深化。 本文第三章討論《蕾米亞》。此詩寫一母蛇求得神助,化作女子與凡人相戀,最後仍在眾人眼前被貶回原形,在當時可謂聳動。集強大的欲望及文字能量於一身,費解卻使讀者著迷之作品,濟慈在書信中曾稱之「寓言」。由此觀之,此傳奇詩內部蓄積潛能動勢,只為一舉超脫歷史桎梏,有如蛇體貌似蜷曲,實為前進而預備。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines the wishes and longings in John Keats’s narrative poems that are informed by their socio-historical situation, and argues that Keats’s literary aspirations belong to the second-generation British Romantics’ attempt to resuscitate energies that fuelled progressive politics in a period when the high hopes of revolution were dashed by post-Napoleonic despair. Keats’s mythological poetry is grasped concretely as a literary endeavor in the face of socio-historical adversity. And this thesis calls Keats’s process of writing mythological narratives his “mythopoesis.” Such a creative process reveals the subtle ways in which an imagination of the otherworldly in fact embodies a struggling, civilizing spirit. This thesis suggests a parallel with the myth of Prometheus.
Chapter One investigates Endymion. While Keats concedes that this mythological romance suffers from inexperience and naivety, this vulnerability of the poem suggests a scarcely concealed utopian impulse, most notably at work in the fragile temporality of the eponymous hero’s quest. Endymion’s desperate embrace of his goddess, along with the unconvincing final resolution of the poem, gives rise to the feeling that Endymion cannot escape from the present; here, one finds an echo of Keats’s sensitivity to human suffering. Only through this tragic conception of life in time can a truly utopian hope be projected. In Chapter Two, this concern is further explored in Hyperion, where the melancholy of the gods expresses the poet’s misgivings about the liberal ideology of progress. Doubt leaves the epic attempt fragmented, and Keats goes on to compose The Fall of Hyperion, in which the visionary speaker’s fall into a melancholy awareness of mortality reveals a deepening of Keats’s utopian fantasy about a collective history. Chapter Three discusses Lamia, a sensational drama about a serpent-woman’s love affair that demonstrates a remarkable degree of libidinal and linguistic energy, which characterizes what Keats refers to as allegory in his letters. The serpentine movement of this romance demarcates the limitations of circumstances, in order to to gesture a potential way out of the historical impasse. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:26:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R04122004-1.pdf: 1841954 bytes, checksum: 80e95c13e37d017ed268e88ea50f2898 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgments i
Abstract ii Table of Contents iv Introduction The Utopian Project of Keats’s Mythopoesis 1 Chapter One Endymion and Tragic Temporality 23 Chapter Two Hyperion’s Melancholy and the Figuring of The Fall 62 Chapter Three Lamia as a Serpentine Allegory 96 Conclusion Aesthetic Form and the Historicity of Imagination 116 Works Cited 119 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 濟慈的神話詩學:時間、憂鬱、寓言 | zh_TW |
dc.title | John Keats’s Mythopoesis: Temporality, Melancholy, Allegory | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 高瑟濡(She-Ru Kao),翁家傑(Jerry Chia-Je Weng) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 濟慈,恩迪密昂,海柏利昂,蕾米亞,時間,憂鬱,寓言, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | John Keats,Endymion,Hyperion,Lamia,temporality,melancholy,allegory, | en |
dc.relation.page | 119 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803526 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 外國語文學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.8 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。