Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70207
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor高偉娟(Wei-Chuan Kao),林世銘(Su-Ming Lin)
dc.contributor.authorHsiao-Man Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃小嫚zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T03:49:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-26
dc.date.copyright2018-02-26
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-01-22
dc.identifier.citationAier, J. K., Comprix, J., Gunlock, M. T. and Lee, D. 2005.The financial Expertise of CFOs and Accounting Restatement. Accounting Horizon 19(3): 123-135.
Aliani, K. 2014. CEO characteristics and corporate tax planning evidence from US companies. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 6(1): 49-59.
Baldry, J. C. 1987. Income Tax Evasion and the Tax Schedule: Some Experimental Results, Public Finance. Finances publiques 42 (3): 357-383.
Bamber, L. S. and Jiang, J.and Wang, I.Y. 2010.What’s My Style? The Influence of Top Managers on Voluntary Corporate Financial Disclosure. Accounting Review 85(4): 1131-1162.
Bantel, K. A. and Wiersema, M. F. 1992. Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change.The Academy of Management Journal 35(1): 91-121.
Bantel, K. A. and Jackson, S. E. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?. Strategic Management Journal 10: 107–124.
Bhagat, S., Bolton, B. J., and Subramanian, A. 2010. CEO education, CEO turnover, and firm performance.
Barua, A., Davidson, L. F., Rama, D.V. and Thiruvadi, S. 2010. CFO Gender and Accruals Quality. Accounting Horizons 24(1): 25-39.
Bertrand, M. and Schoar, A. 2003. Managing with style: The effect of Managers on firm policies.The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1169–1208.
Betz, M., O'Connell, L. and Shepard, J. M.1989. Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical. Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 8: 321–324.
Carlsson, G. and Karlsson, K. 1970. Age, cohorts and the generation of generations. American Sociological Review 35(4):710–718.
Cavanagh, G. F. 2009. What's Good for Business? The ethical. legacy of Catholic business schools 2009 issue.
Chatterjee, A. and Hambrick D. C. 2009. How Narc(2): 202-237.
Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin. 2010. Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics 95(1): 41–61.
issistic CEOs React to Their Successes and Stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly. 56
Crocker, K. J. and Slemrod, J.. 2004. Corporate Tax Evasion With Agency Costs. Journal of Public Economics 89(9-10):1593-1610.
Cullis, J. G. and Lewis, A., 1997. Why people pay taxes: From a conventional economic model to a model of social convention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18 (2-3): 305-321.
Custodio, C., and Metzger, D. 2014. Financial expert CEOs: CEO's work experience and firm's financial policies. Journal of Financial Economics 114 (1): 125–154.
Desai, M., and Dharmapala, D. 2006. Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1): 145-179.
Desai, M., Foley, C., Fritz and Hines Jr., James R. 2008. Domestic Effects of the Foreign Activities of U.S. Multinationals. Ross School of Business Paper No. 1020.
Dyreng, S., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E. 2008. Long run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review. 83(1): 61-82.
Dyreng, S., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E. 2010. The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review. 85 (4): 1163-1189.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. and Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. 2004. Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: Implications for the partner preferences of women and men. The psychology of gender : 269-295.
Elsaid, E. and Ursel, N.D. 2012. Age, CEO Succession, and Risk Taking. Accounting and Finance Research 1(2): 77-86.
Fallan, L. 1999. Gender, Exposure to Tax Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Taxation,An Experimental Approach.Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2): 173-184.
Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D. 1996.Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. West Publishing Company, St. Paul, Minneapolis.
Francis, B.B.,Hasan, I.and Wu, Qiang. 2012. Do Corporate Boards Affect Firm Performance? New Evidence from the Financial Crisis. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper 11.
Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., Wu ,Q. and Yan, Meng. 2014. Are Female CFOs Less Tax Aggressive? Evidence from Tax Aggressiveness. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 36 (2): 171-202.
Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J. and Rego, S. O.. 2009. Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review 84(2): 467-496.
Ge, W., Matsumoto, D. and Zhang, J. L. 2011. Do CFOs Have Style? An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Individual. CFOs on Accounting Practices. Contemporary Accounting Research 28(4): 1141–1179.
Geiger, M. A. and North, D. S. 2006. Does Hiring a New CFO Change Things? An Investigation of Changes in Discretionary Accruals. The Accounting Review 81(4): 781-809.
Gioia, D.A. 2003. Teaching teachers to teach corporate governance differently. Journal of Management & Governance 7(3): 255–262.
Girigori, BECZL. 2013. The relationship between CFO expertise and firmperformance. Master Thesis. Department of Finance.Tilburg University.
Goetzmann, W. N. and Kumar, A. 2008. Equity Portfolio Diversification. Review of Finance 12(3): 433-463.
Gore, A., Steve, M., and Yeung P. E. 2007. The Relation betweenFinancial Monitoring and incentives for Chief Financial Officers. Working paper, University of Oregon.
Gottesman, A. A. and Morey, M. R. 2010. Mutual Fund Corporate Culture and Performance. Review of Financial Economics 21(2): 69-81.
Graham, J. R.,and Tucker, A. L. 2006. Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics 81(3): 563-594.
Graham, J. R., Hanlon, M., Shevlin,T. and Shroff, N. 2014. Incentives for Tax Planning and Avoidance: Evidence from the Field. The Accounting Review 89(3): 991-1023.
Graham, J. R., Hanlon, M., Shevlin, T., Shroff, N. 2017. Tax Rates and Corporate Decision-making The Review of Financial Studies 30(9) :3128–3175.
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. and Rajgopal, S. 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40 (1-3): 3-73.
Gupta, S., and Newberry, K. 1997. Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16(1): 1-34.
Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper Echelons Theory: An Update.The Academy of Management Review 32(2): 334-343.
Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9(2): 193-206.
Hanlon, M. 2005. The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book-tax differences. The Accounting Review 80(1):137-166.
Hanlon, M. and Heitzman, S. 2010. A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50(2-3): 127-178.
Hanlon, M., Mills, L., and Slemrod, J. 2007. An empirical examination of corporate tax noncompliance. In Taxing Corporate Income in the 21st Century Publisher, Cambridge University Press. Pages: 171-210.
Hayes, R.M. and Schaefer, S. 1999. How Much are Differences in Managerial Ability Worth?. Journal of Accounting and Economics 27(2):125-148.
Hirshleifer, D., Low, A. and Teoh, S. H. 2012. Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators?. The Journal of Finance 67(4): 1457–1498.
Huang, J. and Kisgen, D. J. 2013. Gender and Corporate Finance: Are Male Executives Overconfident Relative to Female Executives? Journal of Financial Economics 108(3): 822-839.
Jacob, M.,Wentland,K. and Wentland, S. 2014. Firm Tax Uncertainty, Cash Holdings, and the Timing of Large Investment. Working Paper.
Joint Committee On Taxation Press Release. 1999. JCT Press Release: 99-02.
Koester, A., Shevlin, T., Wangerin D. 2016. The Role of Managerial Ability in Corporate Tax Avoidance. Management Science 1-27.
Krishnan, J. and Lee, E. J. 2009.Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Litigation Risk, and Corporate Governance. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28(1): 241-261.
Lisowsky, P. 2010. Seeking shelter: Empirically modeling tax shelters and examing their link to the contingent tax liability reserve. The Accounting Review 85 (5): 1693-1720.
Malmendier, U. and Tate, G. 2005. CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment. The Journal of Finance 60(6): 2661–2700.
Marcel, J. J. 2009. Why top management team characteristics matter when employing a chief operating officer: a strategic contingency perspective. Strategic Management Journal 30(6): 647–658.
McGuire, S. T., Omer ,T. C. and Wang, D. 2012.Tax Avoidance: Does Tax-Specific Industry Expertise Make a Difference?. The Accounting Review 87(3): 975-1003.
Mills, L.1998. Book-tax differences and Internal Revenue Service Adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research 36(2): 343–356.
Mills L.,and Sansing, R.C. 2000. Strategic Tax and Financial Reporting Decisions: Theory and Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 17(1): 85-106.
Minnick, K. and Noga, T. 2010. Do Corporate Governance Characteristics Influence Tax Management? Journal of Corporate Finance 16(5):703-718.
Olsen, K. J. and Stekelberg, J. 2016. CEO Narcissism and Corporate Tax Sheltering. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 38(1): 1-22.
Pegels, C. C., Song, Y. I. and Yang, B. 2000. Management heterogeneity, competitive interaction groups, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 21(9): 911–923.
Peni, E., Vähämaa, S. 2010. Female executives and earnings management. Managerial Finance 36 (7): 629 – 645.
Phillips. D. J. 2003. Corporate Tax-Planning Effectiveness: The Role of Compensation-Based Incentives. The Accounting Review 78(3): 847-874.
Porcano, T. 1986. Corporate Tax Rates: Progressive, Proportional or Regressive. Journal of the American Taxation Association 7: 17-31.
Rego, S., 2003. Tax avoidance activities of U.S. multinational corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research 20(4): 805–833.
Schroedera, D. H. and Salthouseb,T. A. 2004.Age-related effects on cognition between 20 and 50 years of age. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(2), 393-404.
Shevlin, T. and Porter, S. (1992) The Corporate Tax Comeback in 1987 Some Further Evidence. Journal of the American Taxation Association 14(1): 58-79.
Siegfried, J.J. 1974. Effective Average U.S.Corporation Income Tax Rates. National Tax Journal 27(2): 245-259.
Slemrod, J. 2004. The economics of corporate tax selfishness. National Tax Journal 57(4): 877-899.
Stickney, C., and McGee,V. 1982. Effective corporate tax rates: the Effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1(2): 125-152.
Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 2000. Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management 26(6): 1157-1177.
Warren, K..2005. Improving strategic management with the fundamental principles of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review. 21(4): 329–350.
Weisbach, D.A. 2002. An Economic Analysis of Anti-Tax-Avoidance Doctrines. American Law and Economics Review.4 (1): 88-115.
Zimmerman, J. L. 1983.Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 119-149.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70207-
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討公司財務長教育背景與公司避稅之關聯性。過去關於企業經理人與企業避稅的文獻,多聚焦於執行長 (CEO) 或經理人個人之影響,較少關注公司財務長 (CFO) 以及其教育背景之影響。由於公司財務長在公司租稅規劃決策上扮演重要角色,本研究特別限縮公司經理人之範圍,專注於探討不同教育背景之公司財務長對於其公司避稅程度之關聯性。本研究以美國 2000年至2016年S&P 1500之公司作為樣本,採用三年期及五年期現金有效稅率作為公司避稅衡量之代理變數,並以公司財務長最主要的兩大教育背景,商學院企業管理碩士學歷 (MBA) 以及代表具有財會專業背景的美國會計師證照(CPA),作為主要變數。本研究實證結果顯示,公司財務長前述兩項教育背景與公司避稅行為存在顯著正向關係,若公司財務長擁有MBA學歷及CPA證照,則公司之長期現金有效稅率相對較低,公司避稅程度較高。此結果顯示,公司財務長之教育背景,會影響其避稅偏好及避稅能力,進而反應在公司之長期租稅規劃上。另外,本研究亦發現,若公司財務長為男性、較年長,或在公司未委外稅務諮詢的情況下,公司財務長的教育背景對於公司避稅行為之影響會較為顯著。本研究之各項分析探討結果,可供政府機關及學術界與實務界參酌引用。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the relationship between the educational background of CFOs and corporate tax avoidance. Prior literature focuses more on the overall effect of CEOs or executives on corporate tax planning; however, there is little evidence on the relationship between the CFO’s educational background and corporate tax avoidance. Since the CFO plays an important role in making financial and accounting related decisions within the corporation, this research seeks to put emphasis on only CFOs and explore whether CFOs’ professional backgrounds affect their decisions and abilities of tax planning. To effectively measure tax planning behavior, this study uses 3-year and 5-year cash effective tax rate as the tax planning proxy. As for the CFO’s educational background, this study uses his/her MBA degree or CPA license, which are the two major backgrounds of CFOs, as the major proxies. Using a sample of S&P 1500 companies during 2000-2016, this research finds a positive association between CFO’s educational background and corporate tax avoidance. Companies hiring a CFO with an MBA degree or a CPA licence are more likely to have lower cash ETR and more aggressive tax planning, indicating these educational backgrounds associate with CFO’s risk appetite and ability in tax planning. In addition, this study finds that when the CFO is male, older or hired by company without tax consulting, the effect of CFO’s educational background on corporate tax avoidance is more significant. Overall, these results can be useful and serve as a good reference for industrial, academics and government sectors.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:49:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R05722016-1.pdf: 1160182 bytes, checksum: 6a06351661b43599104871b94c41bf79 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 7-10
第二章 文獻探討與假說發展 11-21
第一節 文獻回顧 11
第二節 假說發展 19
第三章 研究方法 22-30
第一節 資料來源與樣本選取 22
第二節 實證模型和變數定義 25
第四章 實證結果與分析 31-56
第一節 敘述性統計 31
第二節 單變量分析 33
第三節 相關係數分析 38
第四節 迴歸實證結果分析 39
第五節 敏感性分析 47
第六節 額外測試 56

第五章 結論與建議 60-62
第一節 研究結論 60
第二節 研究限制與建議 62
參考文獻 63
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject避稅行為zh_TW
dc.subject企業租稅規劃zh_TW
dc.subject財務長zh_TW
dc.subject教育背景zh_TW
dc.subject高階經理人zh_TW
dc.subjectCFOen
dc.subjectTax Avoidanceen
dc.subjectTax Planningen
dc.subjectEducational Backgrounden
dc.subjectExecutivesen
dc.subjectCharacteristicsen
dc.subjectCash Effective Tax Rate(CETR)en
dc.title公司財務長教育背景與公司避稅之關聯性zh_TW
dc.titleThe Relationship between CFO Educational Background and Corporate Tax Avoidanceen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳坤志(Kun-Chih Chen),廖芝嫻(Chih-Hsien Liao)
dc.subject.keyword避稅行為,企業租稅規劃,財務長,教育背景,高階經理人,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordTax Avoidance,Tax Planning,CFO, Educational Background,Executives,Characteristics,Cash Effective Tax Rate(CETR),en
dc.relation.page67
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201800122
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-01-22
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.13 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved