Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69941
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張育森(Yu-Sen Chang)
dc.contributor.authorChun Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳雋zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T03:35:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-02
dc.date.copyright2018-03-02
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2018-02-12
dc.identifier.citation王子定 1967. 應用育林學. 正中書局. 臺北
王廣東、周素平、吳震、謝海燕、李式軍. 2000. 幾種化學藥劑處理對蔬菜劣變種子生活力的影響. 華北農學報15:123-127.
田寶明、彭林、吳金松、李俊、劉雄、王倩倩. 2014. 柚皮果膠理化性質的研究. 食品工業科技35:313-317
史鋒厚、莊珍、羅帥、丁彥芬、沈永寶. 2017. 香圓種子萌發特徵及催芽技術.植物科學學報35:299-304.
朱旺生、常秀、陳雙梅. 2005. 幾種化學物質和溫度處理對高羊茅種子發芽之影響. 種子24:12-15.
阮長林、馮劍、劉強、王瑾、王曉龍. 2013. 水黃皮種子發芽試驗的初步研究. 中南林業科技大學學報33: 38-42.
宋家瑋、歐錫坤. 2003. 激勃素、溶脫、刻傷及濕冷層積等處理改進巨峰葡萄種子發芽. 中華農業研究52:14-22.
呂理政. 2014. 臺灣生活圖曆:黃金田民俗畫X現代生活曆. 廣場出版. 新北.
邱運全、吳志文. 2001. 良質水稻新品種「高雄143號」之簡介. 高雄區農業專訓37期16-17.
邱祝櫻. 2006. 檸檬栽培管理及產期調節. 高雄區農技報導74:2-11.
林居宏. 2014. 台灣產植物石斑木與台灣欒樹化學成分及生物活性之研究. 高雄醫學大學藥學研究所學位論文. 高雄.
林秋惠. 2007. 台灣欒樹雄花及兩性花花部發育與小孢子形成之研究. 國立臺灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所碩士論文. 臺北.
林惠蘭. 2007. 種子變盆栽Book2影音版:蔬菜水果都能種,不用花錢買盆栽. 蘋果屋出版社. 臺北.
沈瑞琳. 2010. 綠色療癒力. 麥浩斯出版. 臺北.
沈榮壽、黃光亮. 1997. 預措處理對夜來香種子發芽之影響. 台灣農業33:114-122.
計明月、張楠、閻啓、文彬. 2015. 頑拗性竹柏種子的貯藏特性. 植物分類與資源學報37:63-70
施昭彰. 2013. 台灣枇杷育種. 臺灣果樹育種研討會專刊p. 131-136
施驊倫、宋妤. 2011. 溫湯處理、流水浸種、發芽溫度、發芽介質及化學處理對苦瓜種子發芽的影響. 植物種苗 13:47-60.
徐聖、羅漢強、王亞男、柯淳涵. 2010. 水黃皮種子油作為生質能源之潛力回顧. 中華林學季刊43:489-504
唐麗、張瑜、傅超凡、鐘秋平. 2011. 不同藥劑處理對野漆樹種子發芽率的影響. 廣東農業科學10:23-26.
郭華仁. 2015. 種子學. 臺大出版中心. 臺北.
梁群健、徐駿逸. 2013. 零失敗種子盆栽全學習─播種、採種、育種圖解入門. 麥浩斯出版. 臺北.
莊純琍. 2012. 柳杉木醋液有機成分之分離及其木材防腐與促進種子發芽之應用. 國立中興大學森林學系碩士學位論文. 臺中.
陳莉鵑. 2006. 竹醋液之蒸餾精製及其於植物生長促進劑之應用. 國立中興大學森林學系碩士學位論文. 臺中.
陳舜英、簡慶德. 2010. 大葉桃花心木種子表現乾儲型的儲藏性質. 台灣林業36:23-26
許再文,何東輯. 2015. 臺灣產芸香科月橘組(sect. Murraya)植物新見. 台灣生物多樣性研究17:349-356
馮鈺婷. 2014. 園藝治療活動之植物適用性分析. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系研究所碩士論文. 臺北.
馮豐隆、張愷玲、張鈞媛. 2010. 大葉桃花心木的生物、生態與利用. 生物科學52:15-24
黃獻文、陳淑玲、張弘毅. 2008. 綠色原鄉遇見風水林. 農委會出版. 南投.
曾煥中. 2008. 以超臨界流體萃取/液相層析質譜法進行龍眼核成分分析. 嘉南藥理科技大學生物科技研究所. 臺南.
張汶肇、林明瑩、卓家榮. 2011. 優質麻豆白柚栽培管理技術. 臺南區農業改良場技術專刊100-3.
楊正釧. 2007. 台灣十九種原生林木種子儲藏行為之比較研究. 國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學研究所學位論文. 臺北.
楊正釧、陳裕星、林讚標. 2000. 大頭茶、黃連木與台灣欒樹種子之儲藏性質. 台灣林業科學 15:91-104.
楊秀珠. 2002. 柑橘整合管理. 行政院農業委員會農業藥物毒物試驗所. 臺中
楊期和、殷壽華、夏永梅、藍芹英. 2002. 九里香種子脫水耐性和萌發生理的研究. 廣西植物22:537-542
楊慶春. 2003. 美人蕉種子發芽促進之研究. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系研究所碩士論文. 臺北.
綠摩豆、黃照陽. 2012. 種子盆栽:隨手撿、輕鬆種. 晨星出版. 臺中.
鄭武燦. 2000. 台灣植物圖鑑(上冊). 國立編譯館. 臺北.
蔡佩蓉. 2011. 柚籽黏質物的純化與應用之研究. 國立高雄大學生物科技研究所碩士論文. 高雄.
應紹舜. 1993. 台灣高等植物彩色圖誌第二卷(增訂一版)羊蹄甲, p.13. 應紹舜. 臺北.
應紹舜. 1993. 台灣高等植物彩色圖誌第二卷(增訂一版)水黃皮, p.252. 應紹舜. 臺北.
應紹舜. 1995. 台灣高等植物彩色圖誌第五卷. 應紹舜. 臺北.
應紹舜. 1998. 台灣高等植物彩色圖誌第六卷. 應紹舜. 臺北.
應紹舜. 1999. 台灣高等植物彩色圖誌第一卷(增訂二版)竹柏, p.154. 應紹舜. 臺北.
應紹舜. 1999. 台灣高等植物彩色圖誌第一卷(增訂二版)枇杷, p.359. 應紹舜. 臺北.
韓靜、王承南、廖寶文、邱鳳英、張留恩. 2010. 半紅樹植物水黃皮發芽試驗. 浙江林業科技30:45-48.
劉建村、嚴滄涼. 2003. 番石榴夏果及冬果生產投入與價格分析. 農業世界243:90-91
謝鴻業. 1998. 台灣番石榴品種的演進與發展. 農業世界174:23-25
薛吉人、王琬伶、張哲瑋、蔡智賢. 2011. 台灣龍眼果實性狀評估與分類. 台灣農業研究60:318-327.
蘇銘言、蘇桂瑢、溫怡文、劉怡佳. 2004. 風中奇緣-桃花心木種子的傳播. 科學教育月刊272: 10-22.
簡慶德、楊佳如、鐘永立、林讚標. 1995. 暖溫和低溫之組合層積促使臺灣紅豆杉種子的發芽. 林業試驗所研究報告10:331-336.
Amen, R. D. 1968. A model of seed dormancy. Botanical Review 34:1-31.
Andreoli, C. and A. A. Khan. 1993. Improving papaya seedling emergence by matriconditioning and gibberellin treatment. HortScience 7:708-709.
Aye, M. M. 2004. Improvement of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) seed germination. NCHU.
Bailly, C. 2004. Active oxygen species and antioxidants in seed biology. Seed Science Research 14:93-107.
Baskin, C. C. and J. M. Baskin. 1998. Germination ecology of seeds with physical dormancy,. Seeds. Academic Press, USA. 101-124 pp.
Basra, S.M.A., M. Ashraf, N. Iqbal, N. Ahmad, R. Ahmad and A. Khaliq. 2004. Physiological and biochemical aspects of pre-sowing heat stress on cottonseed. Seed Sci. Technol. 32:765-774.
Bewley, J. D., K. J. Bradford, H. W. M. Hilhorst and H. Nonogaki. 2012. Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy(3rded.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Brady, S. M. and P. McCourt. 2003. Hormone cross-talk in seed dormancy. J. Plant Growth Regul.22:25-31.
Chen, P. H. and W. H. J. Kuo. 1995. Germination conditions for non-dormant seeds of Monochoria vaginalis. Taiwania 40: 419-432
Chien, C. T., and T. P. Lin. 1994. Mechanism of hydrogen peroxide in improving the germination of Cinnamomum camphora seed. Seed Sci. Technol. 22:231-236.
Corbineau, F. and D. Côme. 1995. Conreol of seed germination and dormancy by the gaseous environment. In J. Kigel and A. Galili(eds), Seed Development and Germination. New York: Marcel Dekker. 397-424 pp.
Danthu, P., J. Roussel, A. Gaye, and E. H. E. Mazzoudi. 1995. Baobab (Adansonia Digitata L.) seed pretreatment for germination improvement. Seed Sci. Techno. 23:469-475
Davies, P. J. 1995. Plant hormones: physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
Daws, M. I., N. C. Garwood and H. W. Pritchard. 2005. Traits of recalcitrant seeds in a semi-deciduous tropical forest in Panamá: some ecological implications. Functional Ecolgy.19: 874-885.
Debeaujon, I. and M. Koornneef. 2000. Gibberellin requirement for Arabidopsis seed germination is determined both by testa characteristics and embryonic abscisis acid. Plant Physiol. 122:415-424.
Finkelstein, R., W. Reeves, T. Ariizumi, and C. Steber. 2008. Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59:387-415.
Gehan Jayasuriya, K. M. G., A. S.T.B. Wijetunga, J. M. Baskin and C. C. Baskin.2013. Seed Sci. Res. 23:257-269.
Graeber, K., K. Nakabayashi, E. Miatton, G. Leubner-Metzger and W. J. J. Soppe. 2012. Molecular mechanisms of seed dormancy. Plant, Cell Environment 35:1769-1786.
Hanumantha, M., R.P. Gunaga, S. S. Biradar, R. S. Patil and P. Shankar. 2014. Enhancement of seed germination in stored seeds using different pre-sowing treatments in Bauhinia purpurea L. J. Applied Natural Sci. 6:707-710.
Hsiao, A. I. 1979. The effect of sodium hypochlorite, gibberellic acid and light on seed dormancy and germination of of wild oats (Avena fatua). Canadian J. Bot. 57:1729-1734.
Hsiao, A. I. 1980.The effect of sodium hypochlorite, gibberellic acid and light on seed dormancy and germination of stinkweed and mustard. Canadian J. Plant sci. 60:643-649.
Hsiao, A. I., and W. A. Quick. 1984. Actions of sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide on seed dormancy and germination of wild oats, Avena fatua L. Weed Research. 24:411-419.
Huang, W. Z., and A. I. Hsiao. 1987. Factors affecting seed dormancy and germination of Johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Weed Research. 27:1-12.
Huang, W. Z., and A. I. Hsiao. 1987. Factors affecting seed dormancy and germination of Paspalum distichum .Weed Research. 27:405-415.
Hsu, H. T. 1996. Description and Illustration in Color of Fruits in Taiwan. Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute & Chia-Yi Agricultural Experiment Station, TARI. Chiayi, Taiwan. 249 pp.
Karssen, C. M., S. Zagorski, J. Kepczynski and S. P. C. Groot. 1989. Key role for endogenous gibberellins in the control of seed germination. Annals Bot.63:71-80.
Kermode, A. R. 2005. Role of abscisic acid in seed dormancy. J. Plant Growth Regul. 24:319-344.
Kuo, W. H. J. 1989. Delayed-permeability of soybean seeds: characteristics and screening methodology. Seed Sci. Technol. 17:131-142.
Kuo, W. H. J. and A. W. Y. Tarn. 1998. The pathway of water absorption of mungbean seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 16:139-144.
Kucera, B., M. A. Cohn, and G. Leubner-Metzger. 2005. Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci. Res. 15:281-307.
Kumar, V., R. Ajeesh and C.M. Jijeesh. 2015. Chemical seed pre-treatments for better germination and seedling growth of swietenia macrophylla King. J. Env. BioSci. 29:367-372.
Liu, M.S., C.Y. Chang and T.P. Lin. 2006. Comparision of phospholipids and their fatty acids in recalcitrant and orthodox seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 34:465-474
Linkies, A., K. Graeber, C. Knight and G. Leubner-Metzger. 2012. The evolution of seeds. New Phytologist 186:817-831.
Lo H. Chian. 1976. Flora of Taiwan. Volume III. N.T.U. Botany Department Press, Taipei, Taiwan
Lopes, J.C., L.G. Barbosa and M.T. Capucho. 2007. Germinação de Sementes de Bauhinia spp. Floresta, Curitiba, PR, 37: 265-274.
Niedz, R.P. 2008. In vitro germination of citrus seed. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 121:148-151.
Nonogaki, H. 2006. Seed germination- the biochemical and molecular mechanisms. Breeding Sci. 56:93-105.
Polat, A.A. 1997. Determination of germination rate coefficients of loquat seeds and their embryos stratified in various media for different durations. Turkish J. Agric. For. 21: 219-224.
Polat, A.A. and N. Kaska. 1992. Effect of stratification on the germination of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica, Lindl)seeds and embryos. Doğa, Tūrk Tarim ve Ormancilik Dergisi 16: 450-459 various media for different durations. Turkish J. Agric. For. 21:219-224.
Puppala, N. and J. L. Fowler. 2002. Lesquerella seed pretreatment to improve germination. Industrial Crops Products 17:61-69.
Rehman, S., R. N. J. Loescher, and P. J. C. Harris. 1999. Dormancy breaking and germination of Acacia salicina Lindl. seeds. Seed Sci. Techno. 27:553-557.
Roberts, E. H. 1973b. Oxidative processes and the control of seed germination. In W. Heydecker(ed.), Seed Ecology pp. 189-231. London: Butterworth. Sauer, D. B., and Burroughs, 1986. Disinfection of seed surfaces with sodium hypochlorite. Phytopathology 76:745-749.
Sanos, M. A. C. D., M. A. de Queiróz, J. D. S. Bispo and B. F. Dantas. 2015. Seed germination of Brazilian guava (Psidium guineense Swartz.). J. seed Sci. 37:214-221.
Wang, H.Y., C.L. Chen, and, J.M. Sung. 2003. Both warm water soaking and matricondi tioning treatments enhance anti-oxidation of bitter gourd seeds germinated at sub-optimal temperature. Seed Sci. Technol. 31:47-56.
White, C. N. and C. J. Rivin. 2000. Gibberellins and seed development in maize. II. Gibberellin synthesis inhibition enhance abscisic acid signaling in cultured embryos. Plant Physiol. 122:1089-1097.
White, C. N., W. M. Proebstiog, P. Hedden, and C. J. Rivin. Gibberellins and seed development in maize. I. Evidence that gibberellin/abscisic acid balance governs germination versus maturation pathways. Plant Physiol. 122:1081-1098.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69941-
dc.description.abstract為便於家庭園藝種子森林盆栽的應用,本研究以‘Eureka’檸檬 (Citrus limon L. Burm. F. ‘Eureka’)、椪柑(Citrus reticulata Blanco)、柳橙(Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck ‘Liucheng’)、麻豆白柚(Citrus grandis Osbeck ‘Mato Paiyu’)、月橘(Murraya exotica L.)、臺灣欒樹(Koelreuteria henryi Dummer)、‘粉殼’龍眼 (Dimocarpus longan Lour. ‘Fen-Ke’)、大葉桃花心木(Swietenia macrophylla King)、羊蹄甲(Bauhinia variegata L.)、水黃皮(Pongamia pinnata L. Pierr ex Merr.)、‘茂木’枇杷 (Eriobotrya japonica ‘Mozi’)、番石榴‘珍珠拔’(Psidium guajava L. ‘Jen-Ju Bar’)、竹柏(Nageia nagi Thunb. O. Ktze.) 共13種木本種子為材料,進行冷水浸種、溫湯浸種、過氧化氫(H2O2)、次氯酸鈉(NaOCl)、醋酸(CH3COOH)及激勃素(Gibberellins, GA3)浸種共6種種子預措處理。檸檬、椪柑、柳橙、麻豆白柚等四種柑橘屬種子另多加去除外種皮處理。
在不同水溫浸種方面,對13種作物進行兩種水溫浸種,分別為25°C冷水浸種及55°C溫湯浸種,調查其發芽率、平均發芽天數、T50及發芽速率指數。四種柑橘屬另多加去除外種皮處理。由於試驗結果繁雜,此處把促進發芽效果定義為:能提升種子總發芽率或能縮短平均發芽天數之效果。試驗結果顯示,四種柑橘屬種子呈現類似的結果,促進發芽能力:去除種皮>冷水浸種>溫湯浸種>對照組;大葉桃花心木、羊蹄甲、臺灣欒樹及番石榴種子呈現類似的結果,促進發芽能力:冷水浸種>溫湯浸種≥對照組;水黃皮促進發芽能力:溫湯浸種>冷水浸種>對照組;枇杷、月橘、龍眼及竹柏呈現類似的結果,促進發芽能力:冷水浸種≥對照組>溫湯浸種。
在化學浸種方面,對13種作物進行四種化學藥劑浸種,分別為5%過氧化氫(H2O2)、6.25%次氯酸鈉(NaOCl)、4.5%醋酸(CH3COOH)及500 mg∙L-1激勃素(Gibberellins, GA3),調查其發芽率,平均發芽天數及發芽速率指數。試驗結果顯示,四種柑橘屬種子以NaOCl處理具有最佳之促進發芽能力;大葉桃花心木及臺灣欒樹促進發芽能力:H2O2、NaOCl及CH3COOH>GA3>對照組;羊蹄甲及月橘以GA3處理具有最佳之促進發芽能力;枇杷促進發芽能力:H2O2、NaOCl及GA3> CH3COOH及對照組;水黃皮促進發芽能力:對照組>H2O2、NaOCl、CH3COOH及GA3;番石榴以CH3COOH處理具有最佳之促進發芽能力;龍眼及竹柏促進發芽能力:GA3≥對照組>H2O2、NaOCl、CH3COOH。
在複合處理方面,探討不同預措處理搭配對6種木本種子發芽之影響。試驗分兩組,第一組以檸檬、大葉桃花心木、羊蹄甲為材料,進行單因子處理(A. H2O2 5%浸種、B. NaOCl 6.25%浸種、C. CH3COOH 4.5%浸種、D.55℃溫湯浸種)及雙因子複合處理(E.溫湯+ NaOCl、F.溫湯+ H2O2、G.溫湯+CH3COOH)。第二組以月橘、枇杷‘茂木’、番石榴‘珍珠拔’為材料,進行單因子處理(A. H2O2 5%浸種、B. NaOCl 6.25%浸種、C. CH3COOH 4.5%浸種、H.500 mg∙L-1 GA3浸種)及雙因子複合處理(I. GA3+ NaOCl、J. GA3+ H2O2、K. GA3+CH3COOH)。第一組試驗結果顯示:檸檬於單因子處理發芽率至76%以上,B處理效果最佳(達85%),複合處理則提升發芽率至84%以上,E處理效果最佳(達90%);大葉桃花心木及羊蹄甲於所有處理發芽率分別均達92%及87%以上,平均發芽天數為對照組>單因子處理>複合處理,發芽天數最短分別為16天(E、F處理)及15.1天(F處理)。第二組試驗結果顯示:番石榴於單因子處理發芽率至25%以上,H處理效果最佳(達41%),複合處理則提升發芽率至48%以上,K處理效果最佳(達59%);枇杷於所有處理發芽率均達92%以上,平均發芽天數為對照組>單因子處理>複合處理,發芽天數最短為6.5天(I處理);月橘於所有處理發芽率均達92%以上,平均發芽天數為對照組>單因子處理及複合處理,發芽天數最短為5.2天(H處理)。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn order to facilitate the application of home plant seed forest potted plants, this study used 13 woody plant species seeds (Citrus limon L. Burm. F. ‘Eureka’, Citrus reticulata Blanco, Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck ‘Liucheng’, Citrus grandis Osbeck ‘Mato Paiyu’, Murraya exotica L., Koelreuteria henryi Dummer, Dimocarpus longan Lour. ‘Fen-Ke’, Swietenia macrophylla King, Bauhinia variegata L., Pongamia pinnata L. Pierr ex Merr., Eriobotrya japonica ‘Mozi’, Psidium guajava L. ‘Jen-Ju Bar’ and Nageia nagi Thunb. O. Ktze. as material to conduct six pretreatments (cold water soaking, warm water soaking, hydrogen peroxide soaking, sodium hypochlorite soaking, acetic acid soaking and Gibberellins soaking.). Four Citrus seeds were also conducted seed-coat removal treatment.
In the different water temperature soaking tests, we conducted 25oC cold water soaking (CWS) and 55oC warm water soaking (WWS) two water temperature soaking treatments on 13 woody plant species seeds mentioned above and investigated their germination percentage, average germination day, T50 and germination rate index. Four Citrus seeds also conducted seed-coat removal (SR) treatment. Due to the complicated test results, the promotion of germination capacity was defined as the effect of increasing the germination rate of the seeds or shortening average germination day. The promotion of germination capacity in four Citrus seeds showed the similar results: SR>CWS>WWS>control; The promotion of germination capacity in Swietenia macrophylla King, Bauhinia variegata L., Koelreuteria henryi Dummer and Psidium guajava L. ‘Jen-Ju Bar’ showed the similar results: CWS>WWS≥control; The promotion of germination capacity in Pongamia pinnata L. Pierr ex Merr. showed the results: WWS>CWS>control; The promotion of germination capacity in Eriobotrya japonica ‘Mozi’, Murraya exotica L., Dimocarpus longan Lour. ‘Fen-Ke’ and Nageia nagi Thunb. O. Ktze. showed the similar results: CWS≥control>WWS.
In the chemical soaking tests, we conducted four chemical soaking treatments: 5% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)、6.25%sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)、4.5%acetic acid (CH3COOH) and 500 mg∙L-1 Gibberellins (GA3) on 13 woody plant species seeds mentioned above and investigated their germination percentage, average germination day, T50 and germination rate index. NaOCl showed the best promotion of germination capacity in four Citrus seeds; The promotion of germination capacity in Swietenia macrophylla King and Koelreuteria henryi Dummer showed the similar results: H2O2, NaOCl and CH3COOH>GA3>control; GA3 showed the best promotion of germination capacity in Bauhinia variegata L. and Murraya exotica L.; The promotion of germination capacity in Eriobotrya japonica ‘Mozi’ showed the results: H2O2, NaOCl and GA3> CH3COOH and control; The promotion of germination capacity in Pongamia pinnata L. Pierr ex Merr. showed the results: control>H2O2, NaOCl, CH3COOH and GA3; CH3COOH showed the best promotion of germination capacity in Psidium guajava L. ‘Jen-Ju Bar’; The promotion of germination capacity in Dimocarpus longan Lour. ‘Fen-Ke’ and Nageia nagi Thunb. O. Ktze.showed the results: GA3≥control>H2O2, NaOCl, CH3COOH.
In the complex pretreatment tests, treatment was divided into two part. The first part used Citrus limon L. Burm. F. ‘Eureka’, Swietenia macrophylla King and Bauhinia variegata L. as material to conduct single-factor treatment (A. 5% hydrogen peroxide soaking, B. 6.25% sodium hypochlorite soaking, C. 4.5% acetic acid soaking, and D. 55 oC warm water soaking) and double-factor treatment (E. warm water soaking+NaOCl, F. warm water soaking+H2O2, G. warm water soaking+CH3COOH). The second part used Murraya exotica L., Eriobotrya japonica ‘Mozi’ and Psidium guajava L. ‘Jen-Ju Bar’ as material to conduct single-factor treatment (A. 5% hydrogen peroxide soaking, B. 6.25% sodium hypochlorite soaking, C 4.5% acetic acid soaking, and H.500 mg∙L-1 GA3 soaking) and double-factor treatment (I. GA3+NaOCl、J. GA3+H2O2、K. GA3+CH3COOH). The results of the first part showed that germination rate of Citrus limon L. Burm. F. ‘Eureka’ reached to over 76% with single factor treatment, the best effect was achieved by treatment B (up to 85%), the germination rate reached to over 84% with double-factor treatment, and the best effect was obtained with treatment E (up to 90%); The germination rate of Swietenia macrophylla King and Bauhinia variegata L. were up to over 92% and 87% respectively with all treatments. The average germination days from high to low were as follows: control group, single factor treatment, double-factor treatment. The shortest germination days of the mahogany were 16 days (treatments E and F) and the orchid tree were 15.1 days (treatment F). The results of the second part showed that germination rate of Psidium guajava L. ‘Jen-Ju Bar’ reached to over 25% with single factor treatment, the best effect was achieved by treatment H (up to 41%), the germination rate reached to over 48% with double-factor treatment, and the best effect was obtained with treatment K (up to 59%); The germination rate of Eriobotrya japonica ‘Mozi’ and Murraya exotica L. were up to over 92% with all treatments. The average germination days from high to low were as follows: control group, single factor treatment, double-factor treatment. The shortest germination days of the loquat were 6.5 days (treatment I) and the Orange Jasmine were 5.2 days (treatment H).
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:35:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-106-R02628133-1.pdf: 4005439 bytes, checksum: 473d07f768ad12bdb67f5d6b17c07d3d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
摘要 v
Abstract vii
第一章 前言 1
第二章 前人研究 2
一、種子盆栽 2
二、13種試驗作物簡介 2
三、種子的發芽 7
四、種子儲藏特性 8
五、種子休眠與發芽預措之方法 9
第三章 冷水浸種、溫湯浸種及去種皮對13種木本種子及4種柑橘種子發芽之影響 17
摘要(Abstract) 17
一、前言(Introduction) 18
二、材料與方法(Materials and methods) 18
三、結果(Results) 22
四、討論(Discussion) 30
第四章 過氧化氫、次氯酸鈉、醋酸及GA3處理對13種木本種子發芽之影響 36
摘要(Abstract) 36
一、前言(Introduction) 37
二、材料與方法(Materials and methods) 37
三、結果(Results) 41
四、討論(Discussion) 55
第五章 複合預措處理對6種木本種子發芽之影響 64
摘要(Abstract) 64
一、前言(Introduction) 65
二、材料與方法(Materials and methods) 65
三、結果(Results) 69
四、討論(Discussion) 72
第六章 結論 87
參考文獻(References) 90
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject發芽zh_TW
dc.subject種子zh_TW
dc.subject預措處理zh_TW
dc.subjectpretreatmenten
dc.subjectseeden
dc.subjectgerminationen
dc.title預措處理對13種木本植物種子發芽之影響zh_TW
dc.titleEffect of Pretreatment on Seed Germination of 13 Woody Plant Species.en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳右人,葉德銘,吳俊偉
dc.subject.keyword預措處理,種子,發芽,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordpretreatment,seed,germination,en
dc.relation.page97
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201800501
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-02-12
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝暨景觀學系zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-106-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.91 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved