論工程技術服務契約之定性及時效 -以規劃設計監造契約為對象

Abstract

本文旨在探討工程技術服務契約之定性及請求權時效的問題。內容以規劃設計監造契約為對象，研究工程技術服務契約的內容及類型、契約定性及法律性質與特性、政府採購法在工程契約上的適用，以及目前國際通用的契約規範、約定、條款還有技術服務廠商酬金請求權之爭議等問題。 首先，依據民法第127條第7款的規定，以及學者見解，論述工程技術服務契約的定性為承攬契約還是委任契約，再就其定性的不同而適用民法第127條2年短期時效或是民法第125條規定15年的一般時效進行討論。另外，就民法第247條之1的規定，討論定型化契約於工程技術服務契約的適用性，以及國際通用的工程契約範本如FIDIC (Federation Internationale des Ingenieurs-Conseils，簡稱FIDIC)的內容說明，並且討論其對於我國工程契約現況的影響。 其次，就工程契約之定性及請求權時效在實務上及學說上的見解加以說明，並且以法院判決為主，就目前實務情況，歸納分析法院見解對於設計規劃、監造，歸類為委任契約或承攬契約或混合契約的情形進行分析。另外，依工程技術服酬金之計算方式以及酬金付款比例及辦法，就工程技術服務酬金請求權起算點進行討論。 最後，以一則具爭議性的經典案例，評析目前技術服務廠商在工程營建環境上所面臨的困境，期待未來法令修改能與時俱進，突破現況。

This thesis focuses on issues of the nature of construction services contracts and the prescription period. The discussion is based on the planning, design and supervision contract and turns to analyze the core value of construction service contracts which includes the research of the nature of the contract, its legal nature and characteristics, the application of the Government Procurement Act, and the standard international terms and conditions. Besides, the disputes over the right to claim remuneration are discussed. The thesis first concerns on the nature of construction service contracts and evaluates whether it should be a hire of work contract or a contract of mandate based on Article 127, Article 7 of the Civil Law and opinions of scholars. Then it next defines whether it should apply short-statute limitation under Article 127 or 15 years-term general statute of limitation under Article 125 of civil law. It also discusses the applicability of the adhesive contract clause toward the construction service contract based on Article 247 of the Civil Law. Besides, the international construction contract model such as the content description of FIDIC( Federation Internationale des Ingenieurs-Conseils，FIDIC), and the impact on the status of China's construction contract are also within the scope of discussion. Secondly, the thesis describes the nature of construction contracts and the statute of limitation by practical and theoretical perspectives. It also includes a systematic discussion of courts’ judgment toward planning and supervision contracts, and analyze how the court categorizes these contracts as mandate contract or hire of work contract or a mixed contract. Furthermore, the discussion also includes an analysis of calculation method of construction and technical remuneration, as well as the proportion and method of payment for remuneration, the commencement point of the claim for remuneration of construction services. Last, the thesis addresses the current difficulties faced by the technical service providers in the construction market base on a classical precedent and expect that revision of the statute will break through the current circumstance.