請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69467完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 趙玲(Ling Chao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shu-Kai Hu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 胡書愷 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:16:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | REFERENCE
1. Alberts, B., et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th ed. 2002, New York: Garland Science. 2. Horejsi, V., et al., GPI- microdomains: a role in signaling via immunoreceptors. Immunology Today, 1999. 20: p. 356-361. 3. Barnett, R.E., L.T. Furcht, and R.E. Scott, Differences in membrane fluidity and structure in contact-inhibited and transformed cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1974. 71: p. 1992-1994. 4. Erb, E.-M., et al., Integrin aIIbb3 reconstituted into lipid bilayers is nonclustered in its activated state but clusters after fibrinogen binding. Biochemistry, 1997. 36: p. 7395-7402. 5. Lundstrom, K., Structural genomics on membrane proteins: mini review. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, 2004. 7: p. 431-439. 6. Neville, A.C., Biology of fibrous composites : development beyond the cell membrane / A.C. Neville. 1993, New York, NY, USA :: Cambridge University Press. 7. Peter Jönsson, A.G., and Fredrik Höök, Accumulation and Separation of Membrane-Bound. Anal Chem, 2011. 83(2): p. 604-611. 8. Nolting, B., Methods in Modern Biophysics. 2nd ed. 2006, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 9. Sprenger, R.R. and J.G. Horrevoets, The Ins and Outs of Lipid Domain Proteomics. Proteomics, 2007. 7: p. 2895-2903. 10. Zheng, Y.Z. and L.J. Foster, Biochemical and Proteomic Approaches for the Study of Membrane Microdomains. Proteomics, 2009. 72: p. 12-22. 11. Castellana, E.T. and P.S. Cremer, Solid supported lipid bilayers: From biophysical studies to sensor design. Surface Science Reports, 2006. 61(10): p. 429-444. 12. Chao, L. and S. Daniel, Measuring the partitioning kinetics of membrane biomolecules using patterned two-phase coexistant lipid bilayers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011. 133(39): p. 15635-15643. 13. Chao, L., et al., Sphingomyelinase-induced phase transformations: causing morphology switches and multiple-time-domain ceramide generation in model raft membranes. Langmuir, 2009. 26(1): p. 344-356. 14. Kiessling, V. and L.K. Tamm, Measuring distances in supported bilayers by fluorescence interference-contrast microscopy: polymer supports and SNARE proteins. Biophysical Journal, 2003. 84(1): p. 408-418. 15. Tamm, L.K., Lateral diffusion and fluorescence microscope studies on a monoclonal antibody specifically bound to supported phospholipid bilayers. Biochemistry, 1988. 27(5): p. 1450-7. 16. Dietrich, C., R. Merkel, and R. Tampe, Diffusion measurement of fluorescence-labeled amphiphilic molecules with a standard fluorescence microscope. Biophysical Journal, 1997. 72(4): p. 1701-1710. 17. Salafsky, J., J.T. Groves, and S.G. Boxer, Architecture and Function of Membrane Proteins in Planar-Supported Bilayers: A Study with Photosynthetic Reaction Centers. Biochemistry, 1996. 35(47): p. 14773-14781. 18. Hook, F., et al., Variations in coupled water, viscoelastic properties, and film thickness of a Mefp-1 protein film during adsorption and cross-linking: a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring, ellipsometry, and surface plasmon resonance study. Analytical chemistry, 2001. 73(24): p. 5796-804. 19. Salamon, Z., et al., Coupled plasmon-waveguide resonance spectroscopy studies of the cytochrome b6f/plastocyanin system in supported lipid bilayer membranes. Biophysical Journal, 1998. 75(4): p. 1874-1885. 20. Reviakine, I. and A. Brisson, Formation of Supported Phospholipid Bilayers from Unilamellar Vesicles Investigated by Atomic Force Microscopy. Langmuir, 2000. 16(4): p. 1806-1815. 21. Keller, C.A. and B. Kasemo, Surface specific kinetics of lipid vesicle adsorption measured with a quartz crystal microbalance. Biophysical Journal, 1998. 75(3): p. 1397-1402. 22. Nollert, P., H. Kiefer, and F. Jaehnig, Lipid vesicle adsorption versus formation of planar bilayers on solid surfaces. Biophysical Journal, 1995. 69(4): p. 1447-55. 23. Cremer, P.S. and S.G. Boxer, Formation and Spreading of Lipid Bilayers on Planar Glass Supports. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1999. 103(13): p. 2554-2559. 24. Starr, T.E. and N.L. Thompson, Formation and Characterization of Planar Phospholipid Bilayers Supported on TiO2 and SrTiO3 Single Crystals. Langmuir, 2000. 16(26): p. 10301-10308. 25. Raedler, J., H. Strey, and E. Sackmann, Phenomenology and Kinetics of Lipid Bilayer Spreading on Hydrophilic Surfaces. Langmuir, 1995. 11(11): p. 4539-48. 26. Daniel, S., et al., Separation of Membrane-Bound Compounds by Solid-Supported Bilayer Electrophoresis. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007. 129(26): p. 8072-8073. 27. Groves, J.T., C. Wülfing, and S.G. Boxer, Electrical manipulation of glycan-phosphatidyl inositol-tethered proteins in planar supported bilayers. Biophysical Journal. 71(5): p. 2716-2723. 28. Tanaka, M., et al., Frictional Drag and Electrical Manipulation of Recombinant Proteins in Polymer-Supported Membranes. Langmuir, 2007. 23(10): p. 5638-5644. 29. Neumann, J., et al., Transport, Separation, and Accumulation of Proteins on Supported Lipid Bilayers. Nano Letters, 2010. 10(8): p. 2903-2908. 30. Hennig, M., et al., Dynamic patterns in a supported lipid bilayer driven by standing surface acoustic waves. Lab on a Chip, 2009. 9(21): p. 3050-3053. 31. Jonsson, P., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009. 131: p. 5294. 32. Jönsson, P., A. Gunnarsson, and F. Höök, Accumulation and Separation of Membrane-Bound Proteins Using Hydrodynamic Forces. Analytical Chemistry, 2011. 83(2): p. 604-611. 33. Jonsson, P., et al., Shear-driven motion of supported lipid bilayers in microfluidic channels. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. 131(14): p. 5294-5297. 34. Johansson, B., et al., Hydrodynamic separation of proteins in supported lipid bilayers confined by gold barriers. Soft Matter, 2013. 9(39): p. 9414-9419. 35. Jönsson, P. and F. Höök, Effects of Surface Pressure and Internal Friction on the Dynamics of Shear-Driven Supported Lipid Bilayers. Langmuir, 2010. 27(4): p. 1430-1439. 36. Jönsson, P., et al., Hydrodynamic trapping of molecules in lipid bilayers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012. 109(26): p. 10328-10333. 37. Gravesen, P., J. Branebjerg, and O.S. Jensen, Microfluidics-a review. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 1993. 3(4): p. 168. 38. De Jong, J., R. Lammertink, and M. Wessling, Membranes and microfluidics: a review. Lab on a Chip, 2006. 6(9): p. 1125-1139. 39. Jönsson, P. and F. Höök, Effects of Surface Pressure and Internal Friction on the Dynamics of Shear-Driven Supported Lipid Bilayers. Langmuir, 2011. 27(4): p. 1430-1439. 40. Hill, R.J. and C.-Y. Wang, Diffusion in phospholipid bilayer membranes: dual-leaflet dynamics and the roles of tracer–leaflet and inter-leaflet coupling. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2014. 470(2167). 41. Camley, B.A. and F.L.H. Brown, Fluctuating hydrodynamics of multicomponent membranes with embedded proteins. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2014. 141(7): p. 075103. 42. Petrov, E.P. and P. Schwille, Translational Diffusion in Lipid Membranes beyond the Saffman-Delbrück Approximation. Biophysical Journal, 2008. 94(5): p. L41-L43. 43. Henley, E.J., J.D. Seader, and D.K. Roper, Separation process principles. 2011, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 44. Morigaki, K., K. Kiyosue, and T. Taguchi, Micropatterned Composite Membranes of Polymerized and Fluid Lipid Bilayers. Langmuir, 2004. 20(18): p. 7729-7735. 45. Ortuso, R.D., U. Cataldi, and K. Sugihara, Mechanosensitivity of polydiacetylene with a phosphocholine headgroup. Soft Matter, 2017. 13(8): p. 1728-1736. 46. Shu-Kai, H., et al., Using crosslinkable diacetylene phospholipids to construct two-dimensional packed beds in supported lipid bilayer separation platforms. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2013. 14(4): p. 044408. 47. Okazaki, T., Y. Tatsu, and K. Morigaki, Phase separation of lipid microdomains controlled by polymerized lipid bilayer matrices. Langmuir, 2009. 26(6): p. 4126-4129. 48. Okazaki, T., et al., Polymerized lipid bilayers on a solid substrate: morphologies and obstruction of lateral diffusion. Langmuir, 2008. 25(1): p. 345-351. 49. Taylor, C.R. and R.J. Cote, Immunomicroscopy. 2006: Saunders Elsevier. 50. Harony, H. and S. Ankri, What do unicellular organisms teach us about DNA methylation? Trends in parasitology, 2008. 24(5): p. 205-209. 51. Boozer, C., et al., Looking towards label-free biomolecular interaction analysis in a high-throughput format: a review of new surface plasmon resonance technologies. Current opinion in biotechnology, 2006. 17(4): p. 400-405. 52. Ray, S., G. Mehta, and S. Srivastava, Label‐free detection techniques for protein microarrays: Prospects, merits and challenges. Proteomics, 2010. 10(4): p. 731-748. 53. Schmitt, K., et al., Interferometric biosensor based on planar optical waveguide sensor chips for label-free detection of surface bound bioreactions. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2007. 22(11): p. 2591-2597. 54. Orgovan, N., et al., Dependence of cancer cell adhesion kinetics on integrin ligand surface density measured by a high-throughput label-free resonant waveguide grating biosensor. Scientific reports, 2014. 4. 55. Novoselov, K.S., et al., Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. science, 2004. 306(5696): p. 666-669. 56. Mohanty, N. and V. Berry, Graphene-based single-bacterium resolution biodevice and DNA transistor: interfacing graphene derivatives with nanoscale and microscale biocomponents. Nano letters, 2008. 8(12): p. 4469-4476. 57. Frank, I., et al., Mechanical properties of suspended graphene sheets. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena, 2007. 25(6): p. 2558-2561. 58. Lee, C., et al., Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. science, 2008. 321(5887): p. 385-388. 59. Blake, P., et al., Graphene-based liquid crystal device. Nano letters, 2008. 8(6): p. 1704-1708. 60. Qi, J.S., et al., The possibility of chemically inert, graphene-based all-carbon electronic devices with 0.8 eV gap. ACS nano, 2011. 5(5): p. 3475-3482. 61. Yan, F., M. Zhang, and J. Li, Solution‐Gated Graphene Transistors for Chemical and Biological Sensors. Advanced healthcare materials, 2014. 3(3): p. 313-331. 62. Lemme, M.C., et al., A graphene field-effect device. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2007. 28(4): p. 282-284. 63. Goniszewski, S., et al., Correlation of p-doping in CVD Graphene with Substrate Surface Charges. Scientific reports, 2016. 6. 64. Chen, F., J. Xia, and N. Tao, Ionic screening of charged-impurity scattering in graphene. Nano Letters, 2009. 9(4): p. 1621-1625. 65. Wang, H., et al., Hysteresis of electronic transport in graphene transistors. ACS nano, 2010. 4(12): p. 7221-7228. 66. Feng, T., et al., Temperature and gate voltage dependent electrical properties of graphene field-effect transistors. Carbon, 2014. 78: p. 250-256. 67. Lee, D., G. Ahn, and S. Ryu, Two-dimensional water diffusion at a graphene–silica interface. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014. 136(18): p. 6634-6642. 68. Lee, M.J., et al., Characteristics and effects of diffused water between graphene and a SiO 2 substrate. Nano Research, 2012: p. 1-8. 69. Pumera, M., Graphene in biosensing. Materials today, 2011. 14(7): p. 308-315. 70. Georgakilas, V., et al., Functionalization of graphene: covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem. Rev, 2012. 112(11): p. 6156-6214. 71. Wang, X., et al., Ultrasensitive and Selective Detection of a Prognostic Indicator in Early‐Stage Cancer Using Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes. Advanced Functional Materials, 2010. 20(22): p. 3967-3971. 72. Mao, S., et al., Specific protein detection using thermally reduced graphene oxide sheet decorated with gold nanoparticle‐antibody conjugates. Advanced Materials, 2010. 22(32): p. 3521-3526. 73. Tamm, L.K. and H.M. McConnell, Supported phospholipid bilayers. Biophysical Journal, 1985. 47(1): p. 105-13. 74. Merkel, R., E. Sackmann, and E. Evans, Molecular friction and epitactic coupling between monolayers in supported bilayers. Journal de Physique (Paris), 1989. 50(12): p. 1535-55. 75. Mou, J., j. Yang, and Z. Shao, Atomic force microscopy of cholera toxin B-oligomers bound to bilayers of biologically relevant lipids. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1995. 248(3): p. 507-12. 76. Ang, P.K., et al., A bioelectronic platform using a graphene− lipid bilayer interface. Acs Nano, 2010. 4(12): p. 7387-7394. 77. Chen, W., et al., Current self-amplification effect of graphene-based transistor in high-field transport. Carbon, 2014. 77: p. 1090-1094. 78. Li, W., et al., Graphene-templated supported lipid bilayer nanochannels. Nano Letters, 2016. 16(8): p. 5022-5026. 79. Axelrod, D., et al., Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophysical journal, 1976. 16(9): p. 1055. 80. Morigaki, K., H. Schönherr, and T. Okazaki, Polymerization of diacetylene phospholipid bilayers on solid substrate: Influence of the film deposition temperature. Langmuir, 2007. 23(24): p. 12254-12260. 81. Daniel, S. and L. Chao, Supported lipid bilayer electrophoresis for separation and analytical studies of cell membrane biomolecules, in Interfaces and Interphases in Analytical Chemistry. 2011, ACS Publications. p. 99-121. 82. Hung, W.-C., et al., The condensing effect of cholesterol in lipid bilayers. Biophysical journal, 2007. 92(11): p. 3960-3967. 83. Scheuring, S., et al., Imaging streptavidin 2D crystals on biotinylated lipid monolayers at high resolution with the atomic force microscope. Journal of microscopy, 1999. 193(1): p. 28-35. 84. Schmidt, A., et al., Streptavidin binding to biotinylated lipid layers on solid supports. A neutron reflection and surface plasmon optical study. Biophysical Journal, 1992. 63(5): p. 1385-1392. 85. Reviakine, I. and A. Brisson, Streptavidin 2D Crystals on Supported Phospholipid Bilayers: Toward Constructing Anchored Phospholipid Bilayers. Langmuir, 2001. 17(26): p. 8293-8299. 86. Miller, C.E., et al., Cholera Toxin Assault on Lipid Monolayers Containing Ganglioside GM1. Biophysical Journal, 2004. 86(6): p. 3700-3708. 87. Darst, S.A., et al., Two-dimensional crystals of streptavidin on biotinylated lipid layers and their interactions with biotinylated macromolecules. Biophysical Journal, 1991. 59(2): p. 387-396. 88. Bruus, H., Theoretical Microfludics. 2008. 89. Kumar, K., Y.-S. Kim, and E.-H. Yang, The influence of thermal annealing to remove polymeric residue on the electronic doping and morphological characteristics of graphene. Carbon, 2013. 65: p. 35-45. 90. Terrettaz, S., et al., Protein binding to supported lipid membranes: investigation of the cholera toxin-ganglioside interaction by simultaneous impedance spectroscopy and surface plasmon resonance. Langmuir, 1993. 9(5): p. 1361-1369. 91. Shi, J., et al., GM1 Clustering Inhibits Cholera Toxin Binding in Supported Phospholipid Membranes. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007. 129(18): p. 5954-5961. 92. Lou, C., Z. Wang, and S.-W. Wang, Two-Dimensional Protein Crystals on a Solid Substrate: Effect of Surface Ligand Concentration. Langmuir, 2007. 23(19): p. 9752-9759. 93. Zhang, X. and V.T. Moy, Cooperative adhesion of ligand–receptor bonds. Biophysical Chemistry, 2003. 104(1): p. 271-278. 94. Merkel, R., E. Sackmann, and E. Evans, Molecular friction and epitactic coupling between monolayers in supported bilayers. J. Phys. France, 1989. 50(12): p. 1535-1555. 95. den Otter, W.K. and S.A. Shkulipa, Intermonolayer Friction and Surface Shear Viscosity of Lipid Bilayer Membranes. Biophysical Journal, 2007. 93(2): p. 423-433. 96. Smaby, J.M., et al., Phosphatidylcholine acyl unsaturation modulates the decrease in interfacial elasticity induced by cholesterol. Biophysical Journal, 1997. 73(3): p. 1492-1505. 97. Ferrari, P., S. Goldstein, and J. Lebowitz, Diffusion, Mobility and the Einstein Relation, in Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems, J. Fritz, A. Jaffe, and D. Szász, Editors. 1985, Birkhäuser Boston. p. 405-441. 98. Jönsson, P., et al., Mechanical behavior of a supported lipid bilayer under external shear forces. Langmuir, 2009. 25(11): p. 6279-6286. 99. Salafsky, J., J.T. Groves, and S.G. Boxer, Architecture and function of membrane proteins in planar supported bilayers: a study with photosynthetic reaction centers. Biochemistry, 1996. 35(47): p. 14773-14781. 100. Jönsson, P., et al., Shear-Driven Motion of Supported Lipid Bilayers in Microfluidic Channels. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. 131(14): p. 5294-5297. 101. Jönsson, P., et al., Shear-driven motion of supported lipid bilayers in microfluidic channels. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. 131(14): p. 5294-5297. 102. Peter Jönsson, A.G., and Fredrik Höök, Accumulation and Separation of Membrane-Bound Proteins Using Hydrodynamic Forces. Anal Chem, 2011. 83(2): p. 604-611. 103. Kashchiev, D., Nucleation: Basic Theory with Applications. 2000: Butterworth-Heinemann. 104. Wimo, A., et al., The worldwide economic impact of dementia 2010. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 2013. 9(1): p. 1-11. e3. 105. Tawa, K. and K. Morigaki, In situ imaging of micropatterned phospholipid membranes by surface plasmon fluorescence microscopy. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2010. 81(2): p. 447-451. 106. Kashchiev, D., Nucleation. 2000: Butterworth-Heinemann. 107. Yavlovich, A., et al., Design of liposomes containing photopolymerizable phospholipids for triggered release of contents. Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry, 2009. 98(1): p. 97-104. 108. Puri, A. and R. Blumenthal, Polymeric lipid assemblies as novel theranostic tools. Accounts of chemical research, 2011. 44(10): p. 1071-1079. 109. Morigaki, K., et al., Photolithographic polymerization of diacetylene-containing phospholipid bilayers studied by multimode atomic force microscopy. Langmuir, 2003. 19(17): p. 6994-7002. 110. Lafkioti, M., et al., Graphene on a hydrophobic substrate: doping reduction and hysteresis suppression under ambient conditions. Nano letters, 2010. 10(4): p. 1149-1153. 111. Sangwan, V.K., et al., Wafer-scale solution-derived molecular gate dielectrics for low-voltage graphene electronics. Applied Physics Letters, 2014. 104(8): p. 083503. 112. Zhu, Y., et al., A solid dielectric gated graphene nanosensor in electrolyte solutions. Applied physics letters, 2015. 106(12): p. 123503. 113. Cheng, Z., et al., Suspended graphene sensors with improved signal and reduced noise. Nano letters, 2010. 10(5): p. 1864-1868. 114. Cheng, Z., et al., Sensitivity limits and scaling of bioelectronic graphene transducers. Nano letters, 2013. 13(6): p. 2902-2907. 115. Piazza, A., et al., Substrate and atmosphere influence on oxygen p-doped graphene. Carbon, 2016. 107: p. 696-704. 116. Pirkle, A., et al., The effect of chemical residues on the physical and electrical properties of chemical vapor deposited graphene transferred to SiO2. Applied Physics Letters, 2011. 99(12): p. 122108. 117. Wang, H., X. Zhang, and H. Takamatsu, Ultraclean suspended monolayer graphene achieved by in situ current annealing. Nanotechnology, 2016. 28(4): p. 045706. 118. Moser, J., A. Barreiro, and A. Bachtold, Current-induced cleaning of graphene. Applied Physics Letters, 2007. 91(16): p. 163513. 119. Mzali, S., et al., Stabilizing a graphene platform toward discrete components. Applied Physics Letters, 2016. 109(25): p. 253110. 120. Mohrmann, J., et al., Persistent hysteresis in graphene-mica van der Waals heterostructures. Nanotechnology, 2014. 26(1): p. 015202. 121. Richter, R.P., R. Bérat, and A.R. Brisson, Formation of solid-supported lipid bilayers: an integrated view. Langmuir, 2006. 22(8): p. 3497-3505. 122. Kwon, S.S., et al., Reversible and irreversible responses of defect-engineered graphene-based electrolyte-gated pH sensors. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2015. 8(1): p. 834-839. 123. Kwon, S.S., et al., Defect-Mediated Molecular Interaction and Charge Transfer in Graphene Mesh–Glucose Sensors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017. 9(16): p. 14216-14221. 124. Nölting, B., Methods in modern biophysics. 2009: Springer Science & Business Media. 125. Kim, J., et al., Visualizing graphene based sheets by fluorescence quenching microscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. 132(1): p. 260-267. 126. Xie, L., et al., Graphene as a substrate to suppress fluorescence in resonance Raman spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. 131(29): p. 9890-9891. 127. Blees, M.K., et al., Graphene kirigami. Nature, 2015. 524(7564): p. 204. 128. Dey, A., et al., Plasma engineering of graphene. Applied Physics Reviews, 2016. 3(2): p. 021301. 129. Gramse, G., et al., Nanoscale measurement of the dielectric constant of supported lipid bilayers in aqueous solutions with electrostatic force microscopy. Biophysical journal, 2013. 104(6): p. 1257-1262. 130. Tian, P., Computational protein design, from single domain soluble proteins to membrane proteins. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010. 39(6): p. 2071-2082. 131. Oleson, T.A. and N. Sahai, Interaction energies between oxide surfaces and multiple phosphatidylcholine bilayers from extended-DLVO theory. Journal of colloid and interface science, 2010. 352(2): p. 316-326. 132. Almonte, L., E. Lopez‐Elvira, and A.M. Baró, Surface‐Charge Differentiation of Streptavidin and Avidin by Atomic Force Microscopy–Force Spectroscopy. ChemPhysChem, 2014. 15(13): p. 2768-2773. 133. Gao, N., et al., Specific detection of biomolecules in physiological solutions using graphene transistor biosensors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016. 113(51): p. 14633-14638. 134. Ping, J., et al., Quantifying the effect of ionic screening with protein-decorated graphene transistors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2017. 89: p. 689-692. 135. Wang, S., et al., High mobility, printable, and solution-processed graphene electronics. Nano letters, 2009. 10(1): p. 92-98. 136. Ang, P.K., et al., High-throughput synthesis of graphene by intercalation− exfoliation of graphite oxide and study of ionic screening in graphene transistor. Acs Nano, 2009. 3(11): p. 3587-3594. 137. Fu, W., et al., Sensing at the surface of graphene field‐effect transistors. Advanced Materials, 2017. 29(6): p. 1603610. 138. Efimova, S.S., V.V. Malev, and O.S. Ostroumova, Effects of dipole potential modifiers on heterogenic lipid bilayers. The Journal of membrane biology, 2016. 249(1-2): p. 97-106. 139. Schamberger, J. and R.J. Clarke, Hydrophobic ion hydration and the magnitude of the dipole potential. Biophysical journal, 2002. 82(6): p. 3081-3088. 140. Ermakov, Y.A. and A. Nesterenko. Boundary potential of lipid bilayers: methods and interpretations. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2017. IOP Publishing. 141. Leonenko, Z., et al., Investigation of temperature-induced phase transitions in DOPC and DPPC phospholipid bilayers using temperature-controlled scanning force microscopy. Biophysical journal, 2004. 86(6): p. 3783-3793. 142. Hu, S.-K., L.-T. Huang, and L. Chao, Membrane species mobility under in-lipid-membrane forced convection. Soft matter, 2016. 12(33): p. 6954-6963. 143. Lowe, B.M., et al., Field-effect sensors–from pH sensing to biosensing: sensitivity enhancement using streptavidin–biotin as a model system. Analyst, 2017. 142(22): p. 4173-4200. 144. Dahim, M., et al., Physical and photophysical characterization of a BODIPY phosphatidylcholine as a membrane probe. Biophysical Journal, 2002. 83(3): p. 1511-1524. 145. Batteiger, B. and R.B. Jones, The use of Tween 20 as a blocking agent in the immunological detection of proteins transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Journal of immunological methods, 1982. 55(3): p. 297-307. 146. Persson, F., et al., Lipid-based passivation in nanofluidics. Nano letters, 2012. 12(5): p. 2260-2265. 147. Mashaghi, S., et al., Lipid nanotechnology. International journal of molecular sciences, 2013. 14(2): p. 4242-4282. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69467 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 細胞膜蛋白質掌管了細胞之間的訊息溝通與各項生理反應,許多疾病是因其功能失常而產生。現今有超過六成的藥物標靶目標為膜蛋白,瞭解其結構與功能,以及其與候選藥物之間的作用,對於藥物發展及疾病治療非常重要。然而,由於膜蛋白的兩性分子特性,將其從脂質雙層膜中取出往往會造成膜蛋白結構的喪失,造成後續研究上的困難。在本論文中,我們在支撐式脂質雙層膜平台上發展各式分離純化與測試之技術,來讓膜蛋白可以在它們原本的脂雙層中被研究。
首先,我們運用微流道來發展測量膜物質在支撐式脂質雙層膜中流動性的平台。水流力先前已被發現可被用來造成各式膜中物質在支撐式脂質雙層膜中的移動,然而其中之輸送現象的機制還尚未明白。主要原因是有別於一般水溶性物質單純在水中的運動,膜中物質的運動同時受到水以及膜兩種流體之流動所影響。並且,脂質雙層膜本身的流動情形也同時會受水流所影響,其複雜性造成了解析上的困難。我們利用許多已知結構的膜中物質,來測試其被水流推動所產生之速度以瞭解並歸納出適當模型。此模型將膜中物質在系統中的力平衡式,表達成膜中物質與系統中各式介質的相對速度乘上相對應的阻抗,以連結膜中物質大小與其速度的關係,有助於未來在分離過程中瞭解不同大小之膜中物質會被分開的程度。另一方面,為了避免微流道中層流所導致的流場分布造成分散現象,我們流場圖案化技術將脂質膜和待測試膜物質置於流道中間之流場較均勻處,以增加量測流動性時的準確性。實驗與理論模型一致的結果表示我們的模型可有效描述此複雜的輸送現象。 接著,我們在支撐式脂質雙層膜中加入可光固化的脂質分子為材料,建造出奈米等級的障礙物以改良膜平台,發展出二維膜中的填充床和篩網。原子力顯微鏡結果顯示奈米結構障礙物的密度可以被紫外光施加強度所調控。當膜物質流經填充床,膜物質的移動速度隨障礙物密度線性下降,使我們可有效的控制膜物質在膜中的流動性。另一方面,我們在可光固化膜中加入不可被光固化的脂質分子,並利用膜分相的現象創造出膜中篩網。藉由調整可光固化和不可光固化脂質分子之比例,篩網中的孔隙大小可以被控制,而將不同大小之膜物質進行過濾。 更進一步,我們將支撐式脂質雙層膜與石墨烯電晶體結合,發展出無標定檢測的平台以解決現今免疫染色法因為額外加入螢光分子而影響了生物分子彼此之辨識能力,而導致錯誤的判斷。我們發現以二氧化矽為基板的石墨烯電晶體在水溶液中不穩定的表現是因為石墨烯與二氧化矽基板中會形成約一奈米的水層。此水層扮演著隔絕層的效果,可以將二氧化矽帶給石墨烯的電洞參雜效應、電子散射、遲滯現象給大幅減弱,使我們能獲得高度穩定性且快速反應之電晶體特性,以利於生物感應器之應用。我們也發展了利用閘極電壓加速水層生成的方法。 此外,之前的研究對於式否能將支撐式脂質雙層膜形成在石墨烯/二氧化矽基板上仍舊有一些爭論,主要因為石墨烯擁有將周圍螢光熄滅的能力,導致常見的螢光判定支撐式脂質膜是否生成的方式無法被使用。為解決此問題,我們發展出改良式螢光漂白後恢復技術來驗證脂質雙層膜之存在。我們發現介於石墨烯與二氧化矽基板間的水層存在會妨礙支撐式脂質雙層膜形成。在搭建出脂質雙層膜於石墨烯表面上後,我們成功利用石墨烯電晶體量化地偵測到帶電物質吸附到膜上。由於偵測目標物質與石墨烯之間被脂質雙層膜分開了約五奈米的距離,使用比一般生理條件離子濃度還要低的緩衝液為環境以降低水溶液中的離子屏蔽效應是必要的。 在本論文所發展之新方法均是為了使膜蛋白能被保護在它們原始的脂雙層環境中,來進行分離純化以及量測其配體作用,以達到未來藥物篩選之目標。我們展示出水流能被利用為驅動力,在支撐式脂質雙層膜平台中對不同大小之膜物質進行分離,並利用改良過的平台以達成不同的分離需求。我們也發展出脂質膜-石墨烯電晶體來對膜物質相關配體作用做無標定檢測。未來我們將這些方法與含有感興趣膜蛋白的真實細胞膜做結合,進行藥物篩選開發等應用。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Cell membrane proteins are vital in cellular communication, function, and health. In fact, the intention of more than 60% of drug targets is to interact with membrane proteins to alter cellular biochemical pathways. Understanding their functions, structures, and interactions with drug candidates are important in drug developments. However, cell membrane proteins are amphiphilic and have structures adapted to the cell membrane lipid bilayer environment, leading to the difficulty in maintaining their structures and functions after they are extracted from cell membranes for further characterization. In this study, we developed new methods to separate and characterize membrane-embedded species in supported lipid bilayers (SLBs), so that they can be studied in their native lipid bilayer environment.
First, we developed an effectively controlled SLB platform for examining membrane species mobility under in-lipid-membrane forced convection in microfluidic channels. Although hydrodynamic flows have been applied to transport membrane species in SLBs for separation purposes based on the concept of chromatography, the transport mechanism is still unclear. The major reason is that the membrane species are convected by not only hydrodynamic flow but also the surrounding fluid lipid membrane which is also influenced by hydrodynamic force simultaneously, resulting in the difficulty to analyze the transport mechanism. Therefore, we developed a model in the form of the applied driving force and the resistances that the membrane species encountered to predict the mobility. On the other hand, we used a microfluidic device for controlling the flow to arrange the lipid membrane and the tested membrane species in the desirable locations in order to obtain a SLB platform which can provide clear mobility responses of the species without disturbance from the species dispersion effect. The consistency between the experimental results and the model predictions suggests that our model based on lateral drag and sliding frictions between the species and the lipid leaflets can be used to describe the mobility of membrane species. Second, we used a type of crosslinkable diacetylene phospholipids, DiynePC, to create “2-D barriers” in order to construct two conventional separation processes, chromatography and filtration, in SLBs. Our atomic force microscopy result shows that the nano-scaled structure density of the “2-D packed-bed” can be tuned by the UV dose applied to the DiynePC membrane. When the model membrane biomolecules were forced to transport through the packed-bed region, their concentration front velocities were found to linearly decrease with the UV dose, indicating the successful creation of packed obstacles in SLBs. On the other hand, we mixed uncrosslinkable lipids with DiynePC and used the phase segregation to constructed 2-D filters. The cutoff size of the filter can be manipulated by the lipid molar ratio to sieve different hydrophilic size membrane associated species. Third, we combined graphene field effect transistors (GFETs) with the SLB platform in order to label-free detect ligand binding at the lipid membrane, since the current immunodetection methods may alter the biomolecular interactions. GFETs provide rapid responses with high sensitivity. We discovered the instability of the electrical performance of silica-based GFETs in aqueous environment because of the water intercalation between graphene and SiO2 substrate. The water layer can act as an isolated film which can significantly reduce the influence from SiO2, including the hysteresis phenomena. In addition, we developed the method to accelerate the formation of water layer for highly stable and fast response GFETs. Furthermore, whether the SLB can form on graphene/SiO2 was still controversial because the fluorescence quenching effect of graphene. To eliminate the confusion, we developed a modified fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching (FRAP) method to verify the existence of SLBs on graphene area in our system, and we found the water intercalation would hamper the formation of SLBs on graphene/SiO2 substrate. We successfully used GFETs to detect the molecule adsorption onto the SLBs formed above graphene channels. We successfully used GFETs to quantitatively detect the molecule adsorption onto the SLBs formed above graphene channels. Low ionic strength was required to reduce the screening effect for larger responses since the analytes and graphene were separated by SLBs. The works in this thesis are intended to developed new methods to separate membrane proteins and detect the ligand binding to the membrane proteins for potential drug screening purpose. We used model membrane species to demonstrate that we can separate membrane associated species based on their hydrophilic sizes and hydrophobic sizes, incorporate conventional separation processes into lipid bilayer platforms to tune the separation efficiency, and detect the ligand binding at the lipid bilayer platforms with a label-free GFET technique. In the future, we will further combine these methods with cell membrane patches with membrane proteins from interested cells to achieve drug screening applications. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:16:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-F00524082-1.pdf: 4400551 bytes, checksum: 6daa28c8796777e85017697d15d936cc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
Acknowlegement i 摘要... ii Abstract v Table of Content ix Figure Captions. xiv Table Captions. xxii Chapter 1..... Introduction. 1 1.1 Importance of cell membrane proteins. 1 1.2 Difficulty in separating membrane species for further characterizations. 1 1.3 Model membrane platform: Supported Lipid Bilayers. 2 1.4 Transporting membrane embedded species in SLBs by hydrodynamic flow.. 3 1.5 Difficulty of obtaining the transport mechanism of membrane species in SLBs 5 1.6 Modifications of SLB platforms for more effective separation. 6 1.6.1 Photo-crosslinkable lipid. 6 1.6.2 Packed beds in chromatography. 7 1.6.3 Filtration process. 8 1.7 Label-free detections. 10 1.8 Graphene Field effect transistors (GFETs) 10 1.9 Current challenges of using GFETs in aqueous environment and the combination with SLB platforms. 11 Chapter 2..... Materials and Method. 13 2.1 Materials. 13 2.2 Apparatus. 16 2.3 Preparation of large unilamellar vesicles for lipid vesicle deposition. 18 2.4 Fabrication of the microfluidic device. 19 2.5 Formation of SLBs in the microfluidic device in desired place. 19 2.6 Temperature control of the formation of SLBs which contain DiynePC.. 20 2.7 UV radiation treatment for crosslinking DiynePC lipids. 21 2.8 Images by fluorescence microscopy. 21 2.9 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and modified FRAP methods (hole FRAP) 21 2.10 Construction of SLB platforms by flow patterning crosslinkable lipids and transportation of membrane embedded species by applying hydrodynamic flows in microfluidic channels. 22 2.10.1 The platform with uniform hydrodynamic driving force over membranes 22 2.10.2 The platform with 2-D membrane filter made by crosslinking phase segregated DiynePC 24 2.10.3 The platform with 2-D packed bed made by crosslinked DiynePC metrics 25 2.11 Data analysis of membrane embedded species movements. 28 2.11.1 Differential intensity velocity. 28 2.11.2 Penetration ratio in DiynePC metrics. 29 2.11.3 Concentration front velocity. 31 2.12 Estimation of hydrated size and shape of membrane species. 32 2.13 COMSOL simulation to obtain the hydrodynamic force on extruding hydrophilic portion of membrane species. 34 2.14 Estimation of the friction coefficient between the extruding hydrophilic portion of membrane species and top surface of the upper lipid leaflet, but 37 2.15 Atomic force microscopy (AFM) observation of crosslinked DiynePC lipid membranes 38 2.16 Fabrication of graphene field effect transistor devices. 38 2.17 Thermal annealing treatment on GFETs. 39 2.18 GFET transfer curve measurement and experimental setup. 39 2.19 Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements of graphene on SiO2 41 2.20 Adsorption of biomolecules onto SLBs above graphene FETs. 41 Chapter 3..... Transport of membrane embedded species driven by hydrodynamic flows in SLBs 43 3.1 Investigate of drifting velocity of membrane embedded species with various molecular structures 43 3.2 Drifting velocity obtained from the flow patterned SLB platform. 44 3.3 Development of a model to describe the mobility of membrane species under forced convection 49 3.4 Comparisons of the model and the experimental mobility of membrane species 55 3.5 Use of the current model to predict the membrane species mobility. 57 3.6 Possible model extension for transmembrane species. 58 3.7 Conclusion. 61 Chapter 4..... Modification of SLB platforms for more efficient separation. 63 4.1 2-D filter made by crosslinked DiynePC lipids. 63 4.1.1 Phase segregation in DiynePC/DOPC SLBs. 63 4.1.2 Filtering membrane species in DiynePC filter barriers. 64 4.1.3 Penetration ratio of membrane species with different membrane embedded sizes in DiynePC filter barriers 67 4.1.4 Advantages of using phase segregation to generate the barrier structure. 69 4.1.5 Possibilities to adjust the barrier structure. 71 4.1.6 Conclusion. 72 4.2 2-D packed bed made by crosslinked DiynePC lipids. 73 4.2.1 Morphology of 2-D packed bed DiynePC matrices with different UV dosages imaged by AFM 73 4.2.2 Movements of membrane embedded species in the 2-D packed bed membranes. 74 4.2.3 The influence of 2-D packed bed to membrane species mobility. 79 4.2.4 Conclusion. 80 Chapter 5..... The formation and influence of the water intercalation to SiO2 supported graphene field effect transistors 82 5.1 Instable performance of GFETs on SiO2 in aqueous environment 82 5.2 The influence of the water intercalation to GFET electrical properties. 86 5.3 Acceleration of the water intercalation by applying negative voltage on graphene channel 90 5.4 Conclusion. 94 Chapter 6..... Development of supported lipid bilayer–graphene field effect transistor platform for label-free detection. 96 6.1 Modified fluorescence recovery after photobleaching to verify the formation of SLBs on graphene 97 6.2 Influence of water intercalation between graphene and SiO2 to the formation of SLBs 99 6.3 Screening effect of supported lipid bilayers on GFETs. 103 6.4 Quantitative detection of the ligand-receptor interactions on the SLB by GFETs 107 6.5 Selectivity of GFETs with coated SLBs. 109 6.6 Conclusion. 110 Chapter 7..... Conclusion. 111 REFERENCE. 114 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 藥物篩選 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 膜蛋白 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 石墨烯 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 細胞膜 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 光固化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 脂質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 無標定檢測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | field effect transistor | en |
| dc.subject | membrane protein | en |
| dc.subject | purification | en |
| dc.subject | separation | en |
| dc.subject | crosslinkable lipid | en |
| dc.subject | graphene | en |
| dc.subject | supported lipid bilayer | en |
| dc.subject | label-free | en |
| dc.subject | biosensor | en |
| dc.title | 在支撐式脂質雙層膜中傳輸、過濾、以及無標定偵測細胞膜物質 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Transportation, filtration, and label-free detection of membrane associated species in supported lipid bilayers | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝之真(Chih-Chen Hsieh),廖英志(Ying-Chih Liao),李文亞(Wen-Ya Lee),董奕鍾(Yi-Chung Tung) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 膜蛋白,石墨烯,藥物篩選,細胞膜,光固化,脂質,無標定檢測, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | supported lipid bilayer,membrane protein,purification,separation,crosslinkable lipid,graphene,field effect transistor,label-free,biosensor, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 121 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800995 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 化學工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 化學工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
