請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6930
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 簡旭伸(Shiuh-Shen Chien) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Fen Kang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 康嘉芬 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-17T09:21:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-19 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-17T09:21:30Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-03-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-02-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | (一) 中文部分:
1. 出版品 丁韶彬 (2010) 大國對外援助-社會交換論的視角,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。 中國國務院 (2011) 中國的對外援助白皮書。 文崇一 (1989) 台灣的社區權力結構,台北:東大。 李小雲、唐麗霞、武普 (2009) 國際發展援助概論,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。 何景榮、陳琮淵 (2009) 非政府援外組織的問責性:台灣「印尼亞齊數位學習計畫」個案研究,台灣東南亞學刊,6(1):147-193。 陳欣慧 (2007) 印尼亞齊客家人研究,國立政治大學民族學研究所碩士論文。 張強、陸奇斌、張歡等 (2009) 巨災與NGO-全球視野下的挑戰與應對,北京:北京大學出版社。 張翰璧、王宏仁 (2000) 資本全球化與階級問題族群化,東南亞的變貌,中央研究院東南亞區域研究計畫,台北:九冠。 畢恆達、王應棠 (2001) 尋找家園—原住民回歸部落現象中的認同轉折與家的意義重建,行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。 楊聰榮 (2000) 暴動歷史、族群關係與政治變遷:印度尼西亞歷史上的政權轉移與反華暴動,東南亞的變貌,台北:中央研究院東南亞區域研究計畫 詹秀員 (2002) 社區權力結構與社區發展功能,台北:洪葉文化。 廖建裕 (2002) 現階段的印尼華人族群,東南亞華人研究叢書之七,新加坡:新加坡國立大學中文系、八方文化企業公司。 廖建裕 (2007) 印尼原住民、華人與中國,南洋大學學術論叢7,新加坡:新加 坡青年書局。 廖建裕 (2008) 東南亞與華人族群研究,新加坡:新加坡青年書局。 劉青雲 (2005) 印尼亞齊解放運動(Gerakan Aceh Merdeka,GAM)之研究:政治與宗教之分離意識,淡江大學東南亞研究所碩士論文。 劉麗雲 (2005) 國際政治學理論視角下的對外援助,教學與研究,10。 謝志誠、張紉、蔡培慧、王俊凱 (2008) 臺灣災後遷村政策之演變與問題,住宅學報,17(2):81-97。 2. 新聞、網頁 一個完全可以信賴的慈善組織 (2011) 中國華文教育網 http://www.hwjyw.com/classroom/content/2011/01/10/14059.shtml [2011年7月13日] 中國人捐建亞齊災民家園 (2007) 北京青年報 http://www.ynet.com/view.jsp?oid=22443644 [2011年7月30日] 中國與印度尼西亞的關係 (2011) 中華人民共和國駐印度尼西亞共和國大使館http://id.china-embassy.org/chn/zgyyn/sbgxgk/ [2011年7月30日] 印尼亞齊省的大愛村經驗 (2010) 莫拉克新聞網 http://www.88news.org [2010年8月28日] 印尼海嘯災民向中國四川地震災區捐款 (2008) 中華人民共和國駐印度尼西亞共和國大使館http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2008-06/10/content_8342401.htm [2011年9月13日] 印尼:提高效率 重在監管 (2008) 四川防震減災信息網http://www.eqsc.gov.cn/zt/kzjzzzcc/zhcj/201006/t20100602_6303.html# [2011年10月11日] 合作協議書正式落實,印中友誼村竣工交接 (2007) 印尼星洲日報http://www.sinchew-i.com/indonesia/node/434 [2011年3月13日] 和平共處五項原則 (2004) 國際在線 http://big5.chinabroadcast.cn/gate/big5/gb.cri.cn/3821/2004/06/21/107@203833.htm [2010年12月12日] 亞齊的“世界工廠”夢想 http://big5.ifeng.com/gate/big5/finance.ifeng.com/news/corporate/20100501/2135359.shtml [2010年05月01日] 楊聰榮 (1998) 為什麼受到印尼欺負的亞齊人也反華?,民主論壇 http://asiademo.org/gb/1998/09/19980929a.htm [2011年5月12日] 羅致政 (2005) 海嘯災難 印尼亞齊的和平契機http://www.lawtw.com/article.php?template=article_content&area=&parent_path=,1,1648,&job_id=80294&article_category_id=1714&article_id=36388 [2010年6月28日] 黃昆章 (2009) 華人與亞齊災區重建,僑協雜誌,(115)。http://www.ocah.org.tw/sidepage/mag_viewpage.php?mag_no=115&id=4858 [2011年1月11日] 華人重返亞齊海嘯災區 釋放災後經濟重振信號 (2005) 新華網http://news.xinhuanet.com/overseas/2005-04/06/content_2794341.htm [2011年4月25日] 專稿:災後重建 世界共同面臨的課題 (2008) 新華網http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/www.godpp.gov.cn/tszs_/2008-06/05/content_13468675_3.htm [2011年7月30日] (二) 英文部分: 1. 出版品 Amarasiri M.W. and Silva (2009) Ethnic, Politics and Inequality: Post-Tsunami Humanitarian Aid Delivery in Ampara District, Sri Lanka, Disaster, 33(2):253-273. Arola, S. A. (2007) Humanitarian Aid: Problems and Solutions, Webster University. Bankoff, G. (2003) Cultures of disaster: society and natural hazard in the Philippines, London and New York, Routledge Baum, A., Fleming, R., Davidson, L. (1983) Natural disaster and technoligical catastrophe, Environ Behav, 15:333-354. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., and Wisner B. (1994) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disaster, New York: Routledge. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Bristol, G. (2010) Surviving the second tsunami: Land rights in the face of buffer zones, land grabs and development, Rebuilding after Disasters: from Emergency to Sustainability, London and New York: Spon Press, 133-148. BRR and International Partners (2005) Aceh and Nias One Year After the Tsunami-The Recovery Effort and Way Forward. BRR and Partners (2006) Aceh and Nias Two Years After the Tsunami: 2006 Progress report. BRR (2009) Housing: roofing the pillars of hope, BRR book series. Buttimer, A. (1976) Grasping the dynamism of lifeworld, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 66:277-292. Chang, Y., Wilkinson, S., Potangaroa, R., Seville, E. (2010) Resourcing challenges for post-disaster housing reconstruction: a comparative analysis, Building Research& Information, 38 (3) : 247-264. Clarke, M., Fanany, I., and Kenny, S. (2010) Post-disaster reconstruction: lessons from Aceh, London: Earthscan. Dercon, B., and Kusumawijaya, M. (2007) Two Years of Settlement and Recovery in Aceh and Nias: What Should the Planners Have Learned?, UN-Habitat, Geneva. Dreher, A., and Nunnenkamp, P., and Thiele, R. (2011) Are ‘new’ donors different? Comparing the allocation of bilateral aid between nonDAC and DAC donor countries, World Development, 39(11):1950-1968. Edwards, M. (2000) Future Positive: International Co-operation in the 21st Century, London: Sterling. Emerson, R. M. (1962) Power-dependence relations, American Sociological Review, 27(1): 31-41. Fothergill, A., Maestas, E. G. M., Darlington, J. D. (1999) Race, Ethnicity, and Disasters in the United States: A Review of the Literature, Disasters, 23(2): 156-173. Gaillard, J. C., Clave, E., Vibert, O., Azhari, Dedi, Denain, J. C., Efendi, Y., Grancher, D., Liamzon, C. C., Sari, D. R., and Setiawan, R. (2008) Ethnic groups’ response to the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia, Nat Hazards, 47: 17-38. Gunewardena, N. and Schuller, M. (2008) Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Neoliberal Strategies in Disaster Reconstruction, Lanham, USA, Altamira Press. Hook, S. W. (1995) National Interest and Foreign Aid, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers. IFRC, 2008, IFRC annual report. Kenny, S. (2010) Reconstruction through participatory practice? Post-Disaster Reconstruction: Lesson from Aceh, London: Earthscan. Korf, B., Habullah, S., Hollenbach, P., and Klem, B. (2010) The gift of disaster: the commodification of good intentions in post-tsunami Sri Lanka, Disaster, 34(1):60-77. Kurlantzick, J. (2006) China’s charm offensive in Southeast Asia, Current History, 296:270-276. Lancaster, C. (2007) Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics, Chicago: the University of Chicago Press. Lewis, D. et al. (2005) Actors, ideas and networks: trajectories of the non-governmental in development studies. In Uma Kothari (ed.), A Radical History of Development Studies. London: Zed Books. Meisl, C.S., Safaie, M.S., Elwood, K.J., Gupta, R., Kowsari, R. 2006, Housing reconstruction in northern Sumatra after the December 2004 great Sumatra earthquake and tsunami, Earthquake Spectra, S3(22):777-802 Mitchell, J. K., Devine, N., Jagger, K. (1989) A contextual model of natural hazard, Geogr Rev, 79(4): 391-409. Naim, M. (2007) Rogue aid, Foreign Policy, 159:95-96. Paul, B. K., Brock, V. T., Csiki, S., Emerson, L., (2003) Public response to tornado warnings: A comparative study of the May 4, 2003 tornados in Kansas, Missouri, and Tennessee, Quick Response Report, 165, NHRAIC, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. Paul, B. K., (2005) Evidence against disaster-induced migration: the 2004 tornado in north-central Bangladesh, Disaster, 29(4), p370-385. Quarantelli, E.L (1995) Patterns of shelter and housing in US disasters, Disaster Prevention and Management, 4(3),pp.43-53. Reid, A. (2005) An Indonesian Frontier: Acehnese and Other Histories of Sumatra, Asia Research Institute, Singapore: National University of Singapore. Riddell, R. C. (2007) Does Foreign Aid Really Work?, New York: Oxford University Press. Takahashi, M., Tanaka, S., Kimura, R., Umitsu, M., Tabuchi, R., Kuroda, T., Ando, M., and Kimata, F. (2007) Restoration after the Sumatra Earthquake Tsunami in Banda Aceh: Based on the results of interdisciplinary researches by Nagoya University, Journal of Natural Disaster Science,22:pp53-61. Tan-Mullins, M., Mohan, G., and Power, M. (2010) Redefining‘aid’in the China-Africa context, Development and Change, 41(5):857-881. Samuels, A. (2010) Remaking neighbourhoods in Banda Aceh: post-tsunami reconstruction of everyday life, Post-Disaster Reconstruction: Lesson from Aceh, London: Earthscan. Schmuck, H. (2000) ‘An act of Allah’: religious explanations for floods in Bangladesh as survival strategy, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 18(1), p85-95 Silva, J. D., Lubkowski, Z., and Batchelor, V. (2010) Lessons from Aceh: Key Considerations in Post-Disaster Reconstruction, Disasters Emegency Committee, UK: Practical Action Publishing. Steinberg, F. (2007), Housing reconstruction and rehabilitation in Aceh and Nias, Indonesia-Rebuilding lives, Habitat International, 31:150-166. Suryadinata, L. (1978) Pribumi Indonesians, the Chinese Minority and China: A Study of Perceptions and Policies, Kuala Lumpur and London: Heinemann. Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, j. x., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsiper, A., and Schiller, A. (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 100(14): 8074-8079. Wardhani, D. K., Antariksa, Sari, N. I. (2011) Peunayong chinatown Banda Aceh post-earthquake and tsunami as cultural heritage district, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 1(4):275-282. Woods, N. (2008) Whose aid? Whose influence? China, emerging donors and the silent revolution in development assistance, International Affairs, 84(6): 1205-1221. Yosuke Hirayama (2000) Collapse and reconstruction: housing recovery policy in Kobe after the Hanshin Great Earthquake, Housing Studies, 15(1): 111-128. 2. 新聞、網頁 Aceh Road/Bridge Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Project (2005) Parsons http://www.parsons.com/projects/Pages/aceh-road.aspx [2010年12月12日] East- West Center (2003) www.eastwestcenter.org [2012年1月3日] Global Humanitarian Assistance (2010) www.globalhumanitarianassistance.org [2011年11月22日] Home Sweet Home: From Oxfam to the People (2008) Oxfam GB Indonesia http://oxfamindonesia.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/home-sweet-home-from-oxfam-to-the-people/ [2010年12月12日] The Sphere Project (2011) http://www.sphereproject.org/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,200/lang,english/ [2011年11月22日] World Bank (1999) www.worldbank.org/poverty/scapital [2011年11月22日] (三) 印尼文部分: 1. 出版品 BRR (2009) Donor dan pelaksana rehabilitasi dan rekonstruksi perumahan, PETA• Sebaran Upaya dan Karya, p.100. BPS (2010) Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2010: Data Agregat per Provinsi, Badan Pusat Statistik. Soerijadi Kaharudin (2011) Jackie Chan: The living legend, Scoop: an open window to Kobelco and the world, (4):14. 2. 新聞、網頁 Aceh: Sebanyak 606 Rumah Diserahkan untuk Korban Tsunami (2007) Acheh-Eye.org http://www.aceh-eye.org/a-eye_news_files/a-eye_news_bahasa/news_item.asp?NewsID=6093 [2011年12月18日] Kehidupan Korban Tsunami di Kampung Persahabatan Indonesia-Tiongkok (2008) Jawa Pos http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/zamanku@yahoogroups.com/10585897.html [2011年12月18日] Kampung Jacky Chan di Aceh (2009) Aceh Blogging http://aneukagamaceh.blogspot.com/2009/10/kampung-jacky-chan-di-aceh_20.html [2011年12月18日] | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6930 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 2004年底印度洋海嘯的災後重建是近來最大規模的跨國人道主義援助行動。本研究以中國政府於印尼亞齊援助興建的「中國-印尼友誼村」(文中亦稱為友誼村),探討跨國援助下的災後住宅重建對族群關係的影響,並從援助者與地方的互動關係,理解援助過程以及援助者離去之後受援地方的族群調適現況。研究發問為:(1).中國-印尼友誼村的空間如何建構?援助者與各角色如何互動?創造出何種援助景觀和形象?(2).外來援助者與地方民眾如何建構地方族群社會關係?華人在其中有何特殊性和影響力?創造出什麼樣的集體意識與互動關係?(3).援助成果如何受到時間考驗?空間與社會關係是否轉型?族群關係是否能夠維持?
研究結果發現,透過中印兩國官方力量在友誼村建構出華印混居的空間社會特徵,以及顯著一致的援助地景,當地民眾並將對援助成果的滿意轉化為對華人的友好;而當援助者退場後,地方力量浮現,區位上的弱勢與社區共同議題促使內部民眾益加密切往來,創造出友誼村村民的集體認同與族群通婚,華人的社會網絡則是解決社區經濟的一大關鍵。整體而言,藉由官方與民間不同時期的作用,營造出現今的友好社區形象。 然而,在沒有充足法律規範和執行下,友誼村內住宅改造活動蓬勃發展,援助成品亦出現商品化的現象。作為災後跨國援助象徵友誼村,當居民的身分不再是「災民」,援助方所建構出的均一援助地景逐漸在地化,其所蘊含的紀念性亦漸漸抹平,目前友好的族群關係是否再起變化,值得持續關注。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The post-disaster reconstruction of Indian Ocean Tsunami at the end of 2004 was the largest cross-border humanitarian aid operations in recent years. This study is to focus on “the Friendship Village of Indonesia- China” (thereafter The Friendship Village) in Aceh of Indonesia, built by the Chinese government as cross-border humanitarian aid for post-disaster off-site residential reconstruction. Three research questions are particularly asked in the thesis: first, how and what the Friendship Village space be constructed; second, how the donors and local people construct the social relations especially the ethnic relationships between Chinese and Acehnese; and third, how the aid products resist the time exam.
The Friendship Village was a post-disaster permanent residential reconstruction donated by the Chinese government in a remote area far away from the downtown. The Tsunami victim housing relocation dominated by the Indonesian government was in a format of ethnic-spatial non-segregation between Chinese and Indonesians. The location disadvantages plus ethnic-spatial mixed arrangement offered an opportunity for new residents in the Friendship Village to interact more often and closer not only within Chinese and Acehnese themselves but also between both ethnic groups. The community identity as the villagers of the Friendship Village emerged, which came along with the better social relationship between Chinese and Acehnese. However, due to insufficient regulations, certain villagers redecorated their assigned houses through various spatial means within years. In addition, other villagers even traded their assigned houses to outsiders. These spatial and social changes challenged the previous community operation and ethnic interaction that had been created soon after the establishment of the Friendship Village. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-17T09:21:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R98228004-1.pdf: 7234272 bytes, checksum: ede9fea22ea92edde8e4ce2436041d17 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要…………………………………………………………….................................. .I
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………....II 目錄…………………………………………………………………………………..IV 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………..VI 表目錄………………………………………………………………………….…..VIII 第一章 緒論 ……………………………………………………………………..... 1 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………………... 1 第二節 文獻回顧 ……………………………………………………………. 3 第三節 研究發問與架構………………………………………………………9 第四節 研究設計與方法……………………………………………………. 11 第二章 亞齊、華人與海嘯……………………………………………………….14 第一節 亞齊歷史地理背景…………………………………………………..14 第二節 華印族群關係………………………………………………………..17 第三節 海嘯與重建…………………………………………………………..22 第四節 小結…………………………………………………………………..33 第三章 空間建構-中國-印尼友誼村………………………………………… 34 第一節 國家主導的援建過程………………………………………………..34 第二節 參與角色與互動關係………………………………………………..42 第三節 援建的空間成果與形象……………………………………………..46 第四節 小結…………………………………………………………………..54 第四章 社會建構-地方力量的浮現…………………………………………… 55 第一節 援助者撤出與地方自主……………………………………………..55 第二節 集體意識的凝聚……………………………………………………..56 第三節 華人的特殊性與影響力……………………………………………..61 第四節 援助影響下的華印關係……………………………………………..65 第五節 小結…………………………………………………………………..68 第五章 時間解構-援助成果在地化…………………………………………… 69 第一節 空間地景的變遷……………………………………………………..69 第二節 社會結構的重組……………………………………………………..75 第三節 華人面臨的挑戰……………………………………………………..82 第四節 小結…………………………………………………………………..85 第六章 結論………………………………………………………………………. 86 第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………………. 86 第二節 研究限制……………………………………………………………..93 第三節 後續研究……………………………….…………………………….94 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………….95 附錄…………………………………………………………………………………103 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 跨國援助災後重建下的空間社會-印尼亞齊「中國-印尼友誼村」 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Spatial Social Dynamics behind International Humanitarian Assistance to Post-Tsunami Reconstruction: The Friendship Village of Indonesia-China in Aceh, Indonesia | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王振寰(Jen-Huan Wang),黃麗玲(Li-Ling Huang),楊子葆(Zi-Bao Yang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 國際人道援助,災後重建,海嘯,華印族群關係, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | International Humanitarian Assistance,Post-disaster Reconstruction,2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami,the relationship between Chinese and Acehnese, | en |
dc.relation.page | 104 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-02-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 地理環境資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf | 7.06 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。