請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69163完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊銘欽(Ming-Chin Yang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jen-Chieh Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 呂仁傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:09:55Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-08-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 105年國人死因統計結果分析,衛生福利部,2017.( Source:https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-33598-1.html ,2018/05/25下載)
IPSOS市調公司:台灣AED 市場調查,2015. 立法院社會福利及衛生環境委員會函(台立社字第 1014501721 號),委員蔣乃辛等 23 人擬具「緊急醫療救護法增訂第三十五條之一條文草案」,2012.12.11。 公共場所必要緊急救護設備管理辦法(衛署醫字第1020202525號)。(Source:衛生福利部公共場所AED急救資訊網,http://tw-aed.mohw.gov.tw/ShowNews.jsp?NewsID=17 ,2018/05/25下載) 行政院衛生署2008/4/28日衛署醫字第097020-1292號函文 行政院衛生署2008/11/25日衛署醫字第0970201292號函文 行政院衛生署又於2009年公告之『推動心肺復甦術加自動體外電擊去顫器訓練計劃』 行政院衛生署於2012/5/1日公告:公共場所自動體外電擊去(除)顫器設置指引 黃沛銓:民眾對於施行心肺復甦術、使用公眾電擊器與好撒馬利亞人法的知識、態度與意願。臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所碩士學位論文。2013;1–133。 教育部體育署2014/09/02日(台教體署全(三)字第1030027059號函)文:「路跑活動參與者安全維護及權利保障應注意事項」。 桃園市政府103年補助公寓大廈設置AED執行辦法(source:http://pwb.tycg.gov.tw /home.jsp?id=137&parentpath=0,132,135&mcustomize=onemessages_view.jsp&dataserno =201404150001&aplistdn=ou=data,ou=pwb6,ou=chpublic,ou=ap_root,o=tycg,c=tw&toolsflag=Y,下載日期2018.05.02) 瘋路跑-教育部體育署,2016,(http://www.sa.gov.tw:81/SaCustom/Uploads/Bimonthlys/ Files/157_%E3%80%90%E5%A4%9A%E5%85%83%E8%AB%96%E5%A3%87%E3%80%91%E7%98%8B%E8%B7%AF%E8%B7%91%E3%80%81%E8%B7%AF%E8%B7%91%E7%98%8B.pdf ,2018/06/02下載) 遠見雜誌”國人AED認知度調查”,2016.04(https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.htm l?id=21743 ,2018/06/02下載) 張國治:台灣公眾電擊器的發展:參考美日PAD 之成功經驗。社團法人中華緊急救護技術員協會雜誌。2012;2:5-11。 國情統計通報,第249號,2014.12.27.(行政遠主計總處-國情統計通報, https://www.dgbas. gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1 ,2018/05/25下載) 鄭乃雯:公共場所AED 管理員對於心肺復甦術及自動體外心臟電擊去顫器之知識、態度與意願。臺灣大學公共衛生碩士學位學程學位論文。2016;1–114。 緊急醫療救護法部分條文增修:14-1 & 14-2(Source:全國法規資料庫, http://law.moj.gov.tw /LawClass/LawContent.aspx?pcode=L0020045 ,2018/05/25下載) 應置有自動體外心臟電擊去顫器之公共場所(衛署醫字第1020202615號)。(Source:衛生福利部公共場所AED急救資訊網,http://tw-aed.mohw.gov.tw/ShowNew s.jsp?NewsID=17 ,2018/05/25下載) 日本文部科學省,學校安全調查,平成22年3月底(2010/03).( http://www.mext.go. jp/a_menu/kenko/anzen/1339095.htm ,2018/06/02下載) 北村哲久,石見拓,川村孝,長尾建,田中秀治, et al.AEDの設置台数の増加に伴、一般市民による除細動の実施と-日本總務省消防廳,2010. 韓國『急救醫療法(EMS法)』第四十六條之二。 韓國『急救醫療法施行命令』第二十六條之二。 韓國消費者協會(korea consumer agency,), 자동제세동기(AED) 설치율 낮고 관리 부실해 국민안전 담보 어려워(自動除顫器(AED)安裝率低,管理不實,國民安全受威脅),2014/08/14. Automater External Defibrillator Guide(新加坡心臟基金會(SHF),新加坡民防部隊(SCDF),院前急救護理單位(UPEC)以及新加坡復甦和急救委員會(SRFAC),2018)。 Michelle Lee,SCDF’s MyResponder App Helps Saves Lives. © 2016 Civil Service College.August 2016.(新加坡) SCDF. MyResponder Factsheet. (https://www.scdf.gov.sg/)(新加坡) Singapore Defibrillation Guidelines 2016 ,SMJ-58-354.(新加坡) 2010-AHA-Guidelines-Highlights-Chinese_Traditional(http://guidelines.ecc.org/pdf/KJ-0879%20ECC%20Guidelines%20Highlights%202010%20Chinese-Traditional.pdf) 2015-AHA-Guidelines-Highlights-Chinese_Traditional(https://eccguidelines.heart.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-AHA-Guidelines-Highlights-Chinese_Traditional.pdf) Atwood C, Eisenberg MS, Herlitz J, Rea TD. Incidence of EMS-treated outfhospital cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation. 2005; 67: 75–80. Bækgaard JS, Viereck S, Møller TP, Ersbøll AK, Lippert F, Folke F. The effects of public access defibrillation on survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review of observational studies. Circulation. 2017; 136: 954-965. Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JG, Koster RW. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: systematic review of 67 prospective studies.Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 1479–1487. Berdowski J, Blom MT, Bardai A, Tan HL, Tijssen JG, Koster RW. Impact of onsite or dispatched automated external defibrillator use on survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2011; 124: 2225–2232. Becker L, Husain S, Kudenchuk P, Doll A, Rea T, Eisenberg M. Treatment of cardiac arrest with rapid defibrillation by police in King County, Washington. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014; 18: 22–27. Blom MT, Beesems SG, Homma PC, et al. Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and use of automated external defibrillators. Circulation. 2014; 130:1868–1875. Bo‑Cheng Lin, Chao‑Wen Chen*, Chien‑Chou Chen, Chiao‑Ling Kuo , et al., Spatial_decision_AED_Int_J_Health_Geogr_2016. Caffrey SL, Willoughby PJ, Pepe PE, Becker LB. Public use of automated external defibrillators. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1242–1247. Department of Statistics, Singapore. Singapore Population Statistics 2016[online]. Available at: http://www.singstat.gov.sg/statistics/latest-data#22.Accessed May 27, 2017. Destro A, Marzaloni M, Sermasi S, Rossi F. Automatic external defi brillators in the hospital as well? Resuscitation 1996; 31:39-43. Dr. Mickey Eisenberg, Dr. Freddy K. Lippert, et al.Acting on the Call, Global Resuscitation Alliance 2018. Gibbison B, Soar J. Automated external defi brillator use for in-hospital cardiac arrest is not associated with improved survival. Evid Based Med 2011; 16:95-6. GoodSAM(https://www.goodsamapp.org/home) & (https://twitter.com/goodsamapp) Gräsner JT, Lefering R, Koster RW, et al. EuReCa ONE-27 Nations, ONE Europe, ONE Registry: a prospective one month analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, Weisfeldt M, et al. Public-Access Defibrillation and Survival after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 637–646. Høyer CB, Christensen EF. Fire fighters as basic life support responders: a study of successful implementation. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009; 17: 16. Joglar JA, Page RL. Automated external defi brillator use by police responders:where do we go from here? Circulation 2002; 106:1030-3. Kitamura T, Kiyohara K, Sakai T, et al. Public-Access Defibrillation and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Japan. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 1649-1659. Kronick SL, Kurz MC, Lin S, et al. Part 4: Systems of Care and Continuous Quality Improvement: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation.2015; 132: S397–S413. Larsen MP, Eisenberg MS, Cummins RO, Hallstrom AP. Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a graphic model. Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22: 1652–1658. Lin BC, Chen CW, Chen CC, et al. Spatial decision on allocating automated external defibrillators (AED) in communities by multi-criterion two-step floating catchment area (MC2SFCA). Int J Health Geogr. 2016; 15: 17. Ma MH, Chiang WC, Ko PC, et al. Outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Metropolitan Taipei: does an advanced life support service make a difference?Resuscitation. 2007; 74: 461–469. Ministry of Home Affairs. The SCDF Workplan Seminar 2016 – Speech by Mr K Shanmugam, Minister for Home Affairs and Minister for Law [online].Available at: https://www.mh a.gov.sg/Newsroom/speeches/Pages/The-SCDF-Workplan-Seminar-2016-Speech-by-Mr-K-Shanmugam,-Minister-for-Home-Affairs-and-Minister-for-Law.aspx. Accessed May 27, 2017. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2016; 133: 447–454. Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation. 2015; 95: 81–99. Richard A. Lazar. Strategies for modernizing U.S. AED Laws. Readiness Systems.03-2016. Ringh M, Rosenqvist M, Hollenberg J, et al. Mobile-phone dispatch of laypersons for CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2015,372(24):2316-2325. Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3: 63–81. Smith CM, Lim Choi Keung SN, Khan MO, et al. Barriers and facilitators to public access defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017; 3: 264–273. Valenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Nichol G, et al. Outcome of rapid defi brillation by security offi cers after cardiac arrest in casinos. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1206-9. Wissenberg M, Lippert FK, Folke F, et al. Association of national initiatives to improve cardiac arrest management with rates of bystander intervention and Patient survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2013; 310: 1377–1384. Zafari AM, Zarter SK, Heggen V, et al. A program encouraging early defi brillationresults in improved in-hospital resuscitation effi cacy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:846-52. Zijlstra JA, Stieglis R, Riedijk F, Smeekes M, van der Worp WE, Koster RW.Local lay rescuers with AEDs, alerted by text messages, contribute to early defibrillation in a Dutch out-of-hospital cardiac arrest dispatch system. esuscitation.2014; 85: 1444–1449. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69163 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 中文摘要
前言: 台灣公眾AED的發展起源於2008/1/17日,衛生署召開的『急救教育訓練推廣』討論會,會議中決定將AED納入全民CPR教育訓練中,自此開啟了台灣公眾AED發展的序幕。接著在國內外『產、官、學、醫& NGO組織』各領域公眾AED專家們,經過近五年的研討與努力下,促成立法院在2012/12/25日三讀通過緊急醫療救護法14-1 & 14-2增修條文(公眾AED法案及免責法案),並於2013/1/16日由總統公告實施。台灣公眾AED正式推行至今已五年,有必要整理與分析發展現況,並針對相關政策進行專家訪談與評估,以作為未來修改PAD相關政策之參考。 研究目的: 本研究主要在了解台灣公眾AED發展現況與問題,並就當前建置政策訪談各領域公眾AED專家進行政策評估,以提供未來中央政府衛生主管機關制訂新的公眾AED政策之參考。 研究方法: 本研究將以質性研究(專家訪談),針對台灣現有公眾AED相關政策,包含:法定應設置AED之公共場所、AED管理辦法、AED推廣活動、CPR+AED教育訓練、AED與EMS之結合與運用、AED登錄系統..等,訪問各領域公眾AED專家,收集各專家意見,彙整與分類,做出研究結果。 研究結果: 對於台灣現行公眾AED法定應設置場所,有92%(23位)的受訪者認為需要重新定義(擴大範圍&降低人數限制)。有80%(20位)受訪者認為需要規範AED設置密度,另16%(4/位)受訪者認為需要建議AED設置密度。有96%(24位)受訪者認為需要增加法定AED設置場所(例如:大型工廠、工業(科學)園區、大型集合式住宅、寺廟、大型宴會場所、大型活動、診所…等)。84%(21位)受訪者認為AED應全面或鼓勵登錄。80%(20位)受訪者認為需要一個基金會(NGO組織),協助推廣台灣公眾AED以及學術研究與政策評估建議。 研究結論: 依據研究結果顯示,現行台灣公眾AED法定應設置場所應該重新定義(降低人數限制並擴大及增加範圍)。同時考量空間大小以及人流量,應該規範或建議AED設置密度。另外應該緊密結合EMS,同時結合與運用社群媒體新技術(行動APP),招喚志願救護者,快速取得AED並執行CPR+AED急救,以提升OHCA存活率。 關鍵字:自動體外心臟去顫器、公眾去顫器、心肺復甦術、到院前心肺功能喪失、緊急醫療系統、恢復自主性呼吸與循環、心臟驟停。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract
Background: The development of the Taiwan Public access defibrillation (PAD) originated on 2008/1/17 when the Department of Health convened the 'First Aid Education Training Promotion' seminar. The meeting decided to include AED in the National CPR training which opened the PAD development prologue in Taiwan. Later on, after five years of discussion and efforts made by PAD experts from domestic and abroad, and from various fields of 'the manufacturers, the government, science researchers, medical practioners and NGO', the legislature passed the third reading of the 'Emergency Medical Rescue Act 14-1 and 14-2 Amendment pr-ovisions' (PAD Act and Exemption Act) on 2012 /12/25, and the President announced the implementation in 2013/1/ 16th. Taiwan PAD has been officially implemented for five years, it is necessary to collate and analyze the status quo, and interview the experts for their comments and evaluation on the relevant policies, as the reference for future revision of the relevant policies of PAD. Research purposes: This study is mainly to understand the status quo and problems of the development of PAD in Taiwan by conducting interviews with PAD experts in various fieldsrevarding their comments and evaluation of current policy interviews to provide a reference for future government health authorities to formulate new policies. Methods: This study used qualitative research (expert interviews) to enquire the opinions of PAD experts on the issues of Taiwan's existing PAD policy, including: the mandate places to set PAD, AED management regulations, AED promotional activities, CPR+AED Education training, AED and EMS combination and application, AED login system, etc. Interviewed opinions were sorted and classified to draw the research result. Results: For Taiwan's existing PAD mandate provisions places, 92%(23/25) of respondents thought it was necessary to redefine (broaden the scope and reduce the number of people limit); 80% (20/25) of respondents considered it necessary to regulate the density of AED, 16%(4/25) respondents considered that it was necessary to recommend the AED set density. There were 96% of respondents considered that the need for additional legal requirements for AED setting up venues. 84%(21/25) of respondents thought PAD should be fully or encouraged to register. 80% of respondents considered that a foundation (NGO) would be needed to help promote Taiwan PAD, academic research and to generate policy evaluation recommendations. Conclusion: According to the results of the study, the existing Taiwan PAD mandate places should be redefined. At the same time considering the size of space and human flow, it should be stipulated or recommended an AED density. In addition, we should combine EMS closely with the use of social media technology (mobile APP), recruit volunteer ambulance, get AED quickly, and perform CPR+AED first aid to improve OHCA survival rate. Keywords: Automated external defibrillators (AED)、Public access defibrillation (PAD)、Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)、Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA)、Emergency Medical Services (EMS)、Return of spontaneous circulation(ROSC)、Sudden Cardiac Arrest(SCA). | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:09:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-P05848011-1.pdf: 2983596 bytes, checksum: a2c7a7d0627dd93217480ca74ce775da (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員核定書-------------------------------------i
謝詞----------------------------------------------ii 中文摘要-------------------------------------------v 英文摘要------------------------------------------vii 目錄----------------------------------------------ix 圖目錄--------------------------------------------xi 表目錄--------------------------------------------xii 第一章:緒論----------------------------------------1 1.1研究動機-----------------------------------------1 1.2研究背景-----------------------------------------2 1.3研究目的-----------------------------------------4 1.4研究問題-----------------------------------------4 第二章:文獻回顧-------------------------------------5 2.1醫學實證-----------------------------------------5 2.2各國公眾AED相關法規與發展經驗----------------------7 2.3台灣公眾AED相關法規------------------------------25 2.4台灣與各國公眾AED相關法規與政策比較----------------34 2.5各國PAD相關指引(Guidelines)與發展政策------------35 2.6台灣公眾AED發展現況與問題-------------------------47 第三章:研究方法與設計-------------------------------51 3.1研究方法-----------------------------------------51 3.2受訪者選擇標準與招募方式---------------------------51 3.3受訪者分類---------------------------------------52 3.4專家訪談大綱-------------------------------------54 3.5訪談進行方式-------------------------------------56 3.6訪談與資料收集流程--------------------------------56 第四章:研究結果與討論-------------------------------57 4.1專家訪談意見整理與分析----------------------------57 4.2研究發現-----------------------------------------57 4.3政策與推廣活動建議--------------------------------64 4.3.1 政策建議與依據---------------------------------64 4.3.2 政策建議與可行性評估---------------------------69 4.3.3 PAD推廣重點工作建議----------------------------83 4.4研究限制------------------------------ ----------84 第五章:結論與建議-----------------------------------85 5.1研究結論-----------------------------------------85 5.2研究建議-----------------------------------------85 參考文獻:------------------------------------------87 附錄:------------------------------------- --------94 附錄一、台灣公眾AED大事紀----------------------------94 附錄二、專家訪談意見整理-----------------------------103 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 自動體外心臟去顫器 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 心臟驟停 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 恢復自主性呼吸與循環 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 緊急醫療系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 到院前心肺功能喪失 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 心肺復甦術 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公眾去顫器 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Emergency Medical Services (EMS) | en |
| dc.subject | Automated external defibrillators (AED) | en |
| dc.subject | Public access defibrillation (PAD) | en |
| dc.subject | Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) | en |
| dc.subject | Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) | en |
| dc.subject | Return of spontaneous circulation(ROSC) | en |
| dc.subject | Sudden Cardiac Arrest(SCA) | en |
| dc.title | 台灣公眾自動體外去顫器(AED)建置政策之發展現況與評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Current status and the Evaluation of the Policy of Implementing Public Access Automated External Defibrillator (AED) Program in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 石崇良(Chung-Liang Shih) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 馬惠明 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 自動體外心臟去顫器,公眾去顫器,心肺復甦術,到院前心肺功能喪失,緊急醫療系統,恢復自主性呼吸與循環,心臟驟停, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Automated external defibrillators (AED),Public access defibrillation (PAD),Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR),Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA),Emergency Medical Services (EMS),Return of spontaneous circulation(ROSC),Sudden Cardiac Arrest(SCA), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 119 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801575 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.91 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
