請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69136完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林俊昇 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Ying Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳亭穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:09:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-08-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-22 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文部分
1. 陳向明(2002)，教師如何做質的研究，洪葉文化事業有限公司，。 2. 齊力、林本炫(2005)，「質性研究方法與資料分析」，嘉義：南華大學教社所。 3. 胡又慧(1996)，「質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例」，台北：巨流。 4. 潘淑滿(2003)，「質性研究:理論與應用」，台北：心理。 5. 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花 (2005)，「質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析」， 身心障礙研究期刊。 6. 吳芝儀、廖梅花譯(2001)，Strauss & Corbin，「紮根理論研究方法」，嘉義：濤石文化。 7. 萬文隆(2004)，「深度訪談在質性研究中的應用」，生活科技教育。 8. 徐維中(2009)，「社會情境對消費者合理化其奢侈品購買的影響」，國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學研究所碩士論文。 二、 外文部分 1. Adelberg, Sheldon and C. Daniel Batson (1978), “Account- ability and Helping: When Needs Exceed Resources”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 (4), 343-350. 2. Abelson, Robert (1964), “The Choice of Choice Theories”, in Decision and Clioice, eds. S. Messick and A. Brayfield, New York: McGraw-Hill. 3. Bart, Yakov, Venkatesh Shankar, Fareena Sultan, and Glen L. Urban (2005), “Are the Drivers and Role of Online Trust the Same for All Web Sites and Consumers? A Large-Scale Exploratory Empirical Study,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (October), 133–52. 4. Baumeister, Roy F., Kathleen D. Vohs, C. Nathan Dewall, and Liqing Zhang (2007), “How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather than Direct Causation,” Personality & Social Psychology Review, 11 (2), 167–203. 5. Bearden, W.O. and Etzel, M.J. (1982), “Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions”, Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183-94. 6. Berger, Jonah, Alan T. Sorensen, and Scott J. Rasmussen (2010), “Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales”, Marketing Science, 29 (5), 815–27. 7. Bell, David E. (1982), “Regret in Decision Making Under Uncertainty”, Operations Research, 30 (5), 961 -981. 8. Bettman, James R. (1986), “Consumer Psychology”, Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 257-289. 9. Brown J, Broderick AJ, Lee N. (2007), “Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, (21), 2– 10. 10. Brown, J.J. and Reingen, P.H. (1987), “Social ties and world-of-mouse referral behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350-62. 11. Cabezudo, Rebeca San José, Izquierdo, Carmen Camarero, Pinto, Javier Rodríguez (2013), “The persuasion context and results in online opinion seeking: effects of message and source the moderating role of network managers”, Cyberpsychology behavior and social networking, 16(11), 828-35. 12. Chang, Sue-Ting ; Lin, Tom ; Luarn, Pin (2014), “The effects of word-of-mouth consistency on persuasiveness”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 31(2), 128 13. Chung, Siyoung,Cho, Hichang (2017), “Fostering Parasocial Relationships with Celebrities on Social Media: Implications for Celebrity Endorsement”, Psychology & Marketing, 34(4), 481-495. 14. Cheema, Amar and Purushottam Papatla (2010), “Relative Importance of Online Versus Offline Information for Internet Purchases: The Effect of Product Category and Internet Experience,” Journal of Business Research, forthcoming. 15. Chen, Pei-Yu, Shin-Yi Wu, and Yoon Jungsun (2004), “The Impact of Online Recommendations and Consumer Feedback on Sales,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2004. Washington, DC: Association for Information Systems. 16. Chen, Q. (1999), “Attitude toward the site.”, Journal of advertising research, 39(5), 27-37. 17. Chen, Lei-Da ; Tan, Justin(2004), “Technology Adaptation in E-commerce: Key Determinants of Virtual Stores Acceptance”, European Management Journal,22(1),74-86. 18. Childers, T.L. and Rao, A.R. (1992), “The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decision”, Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 198-211. 19. Constantinides, E. and Fountain, S.J. (2008), “Web 2.0: conceptual foundations and marketing issues”, Journal of Direct Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 9(3), 231-44. 20. Davidson, Rob (2011), “Web 2.0 as a marketing tool for conference centres”, International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 2(2), 117-138. 21. Dehghani, Milad, Niaki, Mojtaba Khorram, Ramezani, Iman, Sali, Rasoul (2016), “Evaluating the influence of YouTube advertising for attraction of young customers”, Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 165-172. 22. Dellarocas, Chrysanthos, Zhang Xiaoquan, and Neveen F. Awad (2007), “Exploring the Value of Online Product Reviews in Forecasting Sales: The Case of Motion Pictures,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (4), 23–45. 23. De Mooij, M., & Hofstede, G. (2010), “The Hofstede model: applications to global branding and advertising strategy and research”, International Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 85-110. 24. DeSarbo, W.S. and Choi, J.W. (1999), “A latent structure double hurdle regression model for exploring heterogeneity in consumer search patterns”, Journal of Econometrics, 89(12), 423–455. 25. Dhar, R. and Wertenbroch, K. (2000), “Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods”, Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71. 26. Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017), “Exploring the credibility of online celebrities : Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users” Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1-7. 27. Duan, Wenjing, Bin Gu, and Andrew B. Whinston (2008), “Do Online Reviews Matter? An Empirical Investigation of Panel Data,” Decision Support Systems, 45 (4), 1007–1016. 28. Ducoffe, R. H. (1995a), “How consumers assess the value of advertising.”, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 17(1), 1-18. 29. Eagly, A.H. and Chaiken, S. (1975), “An attribution analysis of the effect of communicator characteristics on opinion change: the case of communicator attractiveness”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 136-144. 30. Edwards, S. M., Li, H., & Lee, J. H. (2002), “Forced exposure and psychological reactance: antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads”, Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83-95. 31. Engel, J.F., Blackwell, R.D. and Miniard, P.W. (1993), “Consumer Behavior”, 7th ed., Prentice Hall Inc, Chicago, IL, New York, NY, 297-304. 32. Erdem, T., Swait, J., & Valenzuela, A. (2006), “Brands as signals: a cross-country validation study”, Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 34-49. 33. Erica, Mina, Okada(2005), “Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods”, Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43-53 34. Escalas, Jennifer Edson, Bettman, James R. (2017), “Connecting With Celebrities: How Consumers Appropriate Celebrity Meanings for a Sense of Belonging, Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 297-308. 35. Fehr, B. A. (1996),” Friendship processes, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 36. Feng Zhu & Xiaoquan Zhang (2010), “Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics”, Journal of Marketing, 74(March), 133–148. 37. Festinger, Leon (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Evanston, IL: Row Peterson. 38. FIND (2005), “The internet reader thought that the blog’s content is useful far compared to the traditional medium”, available at: www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page 1⁄4 news&id 1⁄4 3617, (accessed May 10, 2012). 39. Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. R. (2011), “Social interaction via new social media:(How) can interactions on Twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior?”, Journal of business venturing, 26(1), 1-18. 40. Gillin, P. (2007), The New Influencers: A Marketer’s Guide to the New Social Media, Quill Driver Books, Sanger, CA. 41. Goodrich, K. and Mangleburg, T.F. (2010), “Adolescent perceptions of parent and peer influences on teen purchase: an application of social power theory”, Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1328-1335. 42. Goldsmith RE, Horowitz D. (2006), “Measuring motivations for on- line opinion seeking.”, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6, 1–16. 43. Hall, Calvin S. and Gardner Lindzey (1978), Theories of Personality, New York: John Wiley. 44. Hsee. Christopher K. (1995), “Elastic Justification: How Tempting hut Task-Irrelevant Factors Influence Decisions”, Organiza- tional Behavioral and Human Decision Process, 62 (3), 330-37. 45. Hsiao, K.L., Lin, J.C.-C., Wang, X.Y., Lu, H.P. and Yu, H. (2010), “Antecedents and consequences of trust in online product recommendations: an empirical study in social shopping”, Online Information Review, 34(6), 935-53. 46. Hsieh, Y. C., Chiu, H. C., & Chiang, M. Y. (2005), “Maintaining a committed online customer: A study across search-experience-credence products”, Journal of Retailing, 81(1), 75–82. 47. Hsu, Chin-Lung ; Chuan-Chuan Lin, Judy ; Chiang, Hsiu-Sen(2013), “The effects of blogger recommendations on customers' online shopping intentions”, Internet Research, 23(1), 69-88 48. Jennifer Edson Escalas, James R. Bettman, “Consumers Appropriate Celebrity Meanings for a Sense of Belonging”, Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 297–308 49. Johnson TJ, Kaye BK (2009), “In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of internet among politically interested internet users”, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 175–182. 50. Kennedy G., Dalgarno B., Gray K., Judd. T., Waycott J., Bennett S., Maton K., Krause K.L., Bishop A., Chang R. and Churchward A. (2007), “The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: preliminary findings”, ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore 2007, available at: www.ascilite.org.au/ conferences/singapore07/procs/kennedy.pdf 51. Klein, L. R., & Ford, G. T. (2003), “Consumer search for information in the digital age: An empirical study of pre-purchase search for automobiles”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(3), 29–49. 52. Klena, K. and Puleri, J. (2014), “Greater expectations”, available at: www.935.ibm.com/services/multimedia/GBE03594USEN.pdf (accessed May 25, 2015). 53. Kunda. Ziva (1990). 'The Case for Motivated Reasoning.' Psy- chological Bulletin, 108 (November), 480-98. 54. Kotler, P. (1999), Kotler on marketing – how to create win, and dominate markets, Simon & Schuster Inc. 55. Lai, L.S.L. and Turban, E. (2008), “Groups formation and operations in the Web 2.0 environment and social networks”, Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(5), 387-402. 56. Lim, K., Sia, C., Lee, M. and Benbasat, I. (2006), “Do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy? An empirical study of two trust-building strategies”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 233-66. 57. Long-Chuan Lua, Wen-PinChang, Hsiu-HuaChanga (2014), “Consumer attitudes toward blogger’s sponsored recommendations and purchase intention: The effect of sponsorship type, product type, and brand awareness”, Computers in Human Behavior, 34(May), 258-266. 58. Maccoby E. & Maccoby N. (1954) “The Interview: A Tool of Social Science”, In: G. Lindzey(Ed.)Handbook of Social Psychology. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. 59. Mangold, W.G. and Faulds, D.J. (2009), “Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix”, Business Horizons, 52(4), 357-65. 60. Mikyoung Kim, Mira Lee (2017), “Brand-related user-generated content on social media: the roles of source and sponsorship”, Internet Research, 27(5), 1085-1103. 61. Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L. (1995) “In-depth Interviewing”, Second Edition. South Melbourne: Longman. 62. Nunes, Renata ; Ferreira, Jorge ; de Freitas, Angilberto ; Ramos, Fernanda Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios(2018), “The effects of social media opinion leaders' recommendations on followers' intention to buy”, 20(1), 57-73. 63. Okada. Erica Mina and Stephen J. Hoch (2004). 'Spending Time Versus Spending Money.' Joumal of Consumer Research, 31 (2), 313-23. 64. Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo, and Rachel Goldman (1981), 'Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Ar- gument-Based Persuasion,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, November, 847-855. 65. Ryu, G. and Han, J.K. (2009), “Word-of-Mouth transmission in settings with multiple opinions: the impact of other opinions on WOM likelihood and valence”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 403-415. 66. Shafir, Eldar (1993), “Choosing Versus Rejecting: Why Some Options Are Both Better and Worse Tlian Others”, Memory & Cognition, 21 (4), 546-55. 67. Stephan Ludwig, Ko de Ruyter, Mike Friedman, Elisabeth C. Brüggen, Martin Wetzels, & Gerard Pfann (2013), “More Than Words: The Influence of Affective Content and Linguistic Style Matches in Online Reviews on Conversion Rates”, Journal of Marketing ,Vol.77, 87–10 68. Suh, B. and Han, I. (2002), “Effect of trust on customer acceptance of internet banking”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1 (3), 247-63. 69. Surowiecki J. (2005), The Wisdom of Crowds, Abacus, London. 70. Simonson, Itamar(1989), “Choice based on reasons the case of attraction and compromise effects”, Journal of consumer research, 16(2), 158-174 71. Tetlock, Philip E. (1985), “Accountability: The Neglected Social Context of Judgment and Choice,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 297-332. 72. Tukachinsky, R. (2010), “Para-romantic love and para- friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple parasocial relationships scale”, American Journal of Media Psychology, 3, 73–94. 73. Wang, X., Yu, C. and Wei, Y. (2012), “Social media peer communication and impacts on purchase intentions: a consumer socialization framework”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 198-208. 74. Williams M. (1997), “Social Surveys: Design to Analysis”. In: T. May ( Ed. ) Social Research Issues, Methods and Process. Buckingham: Open University Press. 75. Wu, I.L. and Chen, J.L. (2005), “An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), 784-808. 76. Wu, C.M. (2011), “How quality influence user’s continuance of the recommendation blog”, Key Engineering Materials, 474-476, 1132-6. 77. Yolande Yun-Hsiou Yang, Fang Yu Kuo (2017), “The Influence of Skepticism, Familiarity and Expertise on the Persuasion of Internet Celebrities’ Sponsored Posts”, Marketing Review (Xing Xiao Ping Lun), 14(2), 163-189. 78. Yong, Liu (2006), “Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (July), 74–89. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69136 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來業配文章與影片的頻繁出現，使消費者開始懷疑其可信度，進而影響業配的有效性。因此，探討 YouTuber 業配影片透過哪些重要因素影響消費者購買意願，將有助於企業更精準的選擇業配合作對象，進而有效提高商品轉換率。過去針對業配行銷的探討主要集中在文字形態的社群貼文對於購買意圖之影響，也鮮少有學者解釋，為何消費者在已知接受訊息內容可能是業配的情況下，仍能夠被該內容說服，從而增強購買意圖。因此，本研究希望透過質性訪談，了解消費者對於 YouTube 業配影片、YouTuber 本身與影片內容的態度與看法，並藉此歸納出業配影片影響消費者購買意願的關鍵因素。
本研究發現，消費者在觀看 YouTuber 業配影片時，會同時受到中央途徑（資訊豐富度）以及周邊途徑（情感訊號）的影響，並依此判斷影片的資訊價值，並且藉由這些資訊來其合理化購買意圖。此外，除了資訊豐富度與情感訊號（分享導向、誠懇），業配性質與長期追蹤 YouTuber 所引發的熟悉度也會分別對購買意圖產生負向與正向效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Since sponsored posts and videos spring up on the Internet, the audience begins to have a doubt about the trustworthiness of them, and such situation has impact on the effectiveness of sponsored posts and videos. Thus, discussing the key factors of which a sponsored video effects purchase intention can help enterprises to sponsor the right YouTuber and improve the conversion rate of their promoting products. However, few research is about how sponsored videos improve purchase intention instead of focusing on why sponsored posts have positive effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Also, there is few literature about the reasons that sponsored videos can reinforce consumers purchase intention even if consumers have known they are watching a sponsored video. Through the interview with audiences of sponsored YouTube videos, this research tries to understand consumers’ attitude toward sponsored YouTube video and YouTubers to find out the key factors effect purchase intention.
Results suggest that informative richness, which acts as central cues, and the emotional signals, which act as peripheral cues, can help consumers to figure out the information value of sponsored videos and justify their purchasing decisions. Besides, consumers decrease their purchase intention as they perceive more monetary-gain attribute while they increase purchase intention as they have intimate parasocial relationship with YouTubers. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:09:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05724047-1.pdf: 1815798 bytes, checksum: 8c252626e17574a6a001ae3729b0bc7c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 Web 2.0與資訊搜集 4 第二節 購買決策之合理化行為 6 第三節 第三方資訊與合理化購買意圖 7 第三章 研究方法 8 第一節 研究方法 8 第二節 資料蒐集 11 第三節 資料分析 17 第四章 個案描述與分析 18 第一節 購物前YouTube影片觀賞動機 18 第二節 ELM模型與購買意圖合理化 20 第三節 消費者購買意圖合理化之過程 22 第四節 調節因子 28 第五章 結論 33 第一節 研究發現 33 第二節 管理意涵 35 第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 36 參考文獻 37 表目錄 表 1 受訪者基本資料表 12 表 2 訪談大綱 15 圖目錄 圖 1 研究流程 3 圖 2研究結果架構整理 32 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | YouTuber業配影片對消費者購買意圖之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Influence of Sponsored YouTube Video on Consumer Purchase Intention | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃恆獎,陳思寬 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 購買意圖,業配影片,資訊豐富度,資訊價值,合理化, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | purchase intention,sponsored video,informative richness,information value,justification, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 47 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801608 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.77 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。