請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69072
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭淑芬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Hung Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王智宏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:50:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. A. D. J. Larminie, Fuel Cell Systems Explained 2nd, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,. 2003.
2. L. L. Mond, C., US, 1989, 409, 365. 3. J. G. Liu, T. S. Zhao, Z. X. Liang and R. Chen, J Power Sources, 2006, 153, 61-67. 4. A. Kraytsberg and Y. Ein-Eli, Energ Fuel, 2014, 28, 7303-7330. 5. J. Larminie, A. Dicks and M. S. McDonald, Fuel cell systems explained, J. Wiley Chichester, UK, 2003. 6. P. Costamagna and S. Srinivasan, J Power Sources, 2001, 102, 253-269. 7. R. F. Service, Science, 2006, 312, 35-35. 8. S. K. Kamarudin, F. Achmad and W. R. W. Daud, Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2009, 34, 6902-6916. 9. N. V. Long, C. M. Thi, M. Nogami and M. Ohtaki, in Heat Treatment - Conventional and Novel Applications, ed. F. Czerwinski, InTech, Rijeka, 2012, DOI: 10.5772/51090, p. Ch. 11. 10. O. A. Petrii, J Solid State Electr, 2008, 12, 609-642. 11. M. Sakthivel, A. Schlange, U. Kunz and T. Turek, J Power Sources, 2010, 195, 7083-7089. 12. J. H. Kim, B. Fang, S. B. Yoon and J. S. Yu, Appl Catal B-Environ, 2009, 88, 368-375. 13. Y. Liu, N. Zheng, W. Chao, H. Q. Liu and Y. A. Wang, Electrochim Acta, 2010, 55, 5617-5623. 14. K. T. Hwang, W. S. Um, H. S. Lee, J. K. Song and K. W. Chung, J Power Sources, 1998, 74, 169-174. 15. K. D. Kreuer, J Membrane Sci, 2001, 185, 29-39. 16. H. Ahmad, S. K. Kamarudin, U. A. Hasran and W. R. W. Daud, Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2010, 35, 2160-2175. 17. M. A. Hickner, H. Ghassemi, Y. S. Kim, B. R. Einsla and J. E. McGrath, Chem Rev, 2004, 104, 4587-4611. 18. B. Smitha, S. Sridhar and A. A. Khan, J Membrane Sci, 2005, 259, 10-26. 19. G. Gebel, Polymer, 2000, 41, 5829-5838. 20. J. A. Kerres, J Membrane Sci, 2001, 185, 3-27. 21. N. W. Deluca and Y. A. Elabd, J Polym Sci Pol Phys, 2006, 44, 2201-2225. 22. P. Choi, N. H. Jalani and R. Datta, J Electrochem Soc, 2005, 152, E123-E130. 23. H. G. Haubold, T. Vad, H. Jungbluth and P. Hiller, Electrochim Acta, 2001, 46, 1559-1563. 24. Q. F. Li, R. H. He, J. O. Jensen and N. J. Bjerrum, Chem Mater, 2003, 15, 4896-4915. 25. P. L. Antonucci, A. S. Arico, P. Creti, E. Ramunni and V. Antonucci, Solid State Ionics, 1999, 125, 431-437. 26. M. Watanabe, H. Uchida, Y. Seki, M. Emori and P. Stonehart, J Electrochem Soc, 1996, 143, 3847-3852. 27. J. H. Kim, S. K. Kim, K. Nam and D. W. Kim, J Membrane Sci, 2012, 415, 696-701. 28. M. S. Asgari, M. Nikazar, P. Molla-abbasi and M. M. Hasani-Sadrabadi, Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2013, 38, 5894-5902. 29. Z. Q. Jiang, X. S. Zhao and A. Manthiram, Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2013, 38, 5875-5884. 30. C. H. Rhee, H. K. Kim, H. Chang and J. S. Lee, Chem Mater, 2005, 17, 1691-1697. 31. A. Eguizabal, J. Lemus, M. Urbiztondo, O. Garrido, J. Soler, J. A. Blazquez and M. P. Pina, J Power Sources, 2011, 196, 8994-9007. 32. R. C. Jiang, H. R. Kunz and J. M. Fenton, J Membrane Sci, 2006, 272, 116-124. 33. K. A. Mauritz, I. D. Stefanithis, S. V. Davis, R. W. Scheetz, R. K. Pope, G. L. Wilkes and H. H. Huang, J Appl Polym Sci, 1995, 55, 181-190. 34. C. Yoonoo, C. P. Dawson, E. P. L. Roberts and S. M. Holmes, J Membrane Sci, 2011, 369, 367-374. 35. H. N. Yang, J. Y. Lee, J. Y. Jeong, Y. Na and W. J. Kim, Micropor Mesopor Mat, 2011, 143, 215-220. 36. D. Cozzi, C. de Bonis, A. D'Epifanio, B. Mecheri, A. C. Tavares and S. Licoccia, J Power Sources, 2014, 248, 1127-1132. 37. J. Kim, J. D. Jeon and S. Y. Kwak, Micropor Mesopor Mat, 2013, 168, 148-154. 38. Y. S. Ye, G. W. Liang, B. H. Chen, W. C. Shen, C. Y. Tseng, M. Y. Cheng, J. Rick, Y. J. Huang, F. C. Chang and B. J. Hwang, J Power Sources, 2011, 196, 5408-5415. 39. D. X. Luu, E. B. Cho, O. H. Han and D. Kim, J Phys Chem B, 2009, 113, 10072-10076. 40. L. S. Wang, A. N. Lai, C. X. Lin, Q. G. Zhang, A. M. Zhu and Q. L. Liu, J Membrane Sci, 2015, 492, 58-66. 41. H. B. Li, M. H. Ai, F. J. Jiang, L. J. Yu, H. Y. Tu, Q. C. Yu and H. Wang, J Power Sources, 2011, 196, 4583-4587. 42. S. J. Lue, Y. L. Pai, C. M. Shih, M. C. Wu and S. M. Lai, J Membrane Sci, 2015, 493, 212-223. 43. 臺灣大學化學系周瑋仁碩士論文, 2012. 44. C. W. Yang, C. C. Chen, K. H. Chen and S. Cheng, J Membrane Sci, 2017, 526, 106-117. 45. B. P. Ladewig, R. B. Knott, D. J. Martin, J. C. D. da Costa and G. Q. Lu, Electrochem Commun, 2007, 9, 781-786. 46. C. de Bonis, D. Cozzi, B. Mecheri, A. D'Epifanio, A. Rainer, D. De Porcellinis and S. Licoccia, Electrochim Acta, 2014, 147, 418-425. 47. K. Ahn, M. Kim, K. Kim, H. Ju, I. Oh and J. Kim, J Power Sources, 2015, 276, 309-319. 48. G. Rambabu, N. Nagaraju and S. D. Bhat, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 306, 43-52. 49. A. U. Devi, A. Muthumeenal, R. M. Sabarathinam and A. Nagendran, Renewable Energy, 2017, 102, 258-265. 50. Y. X. Li, M. Hoorfar, K. Z. Shen, J. Y. Fang, X. G. Yue and Z. H. Jiang, Electrochim Acta, 2017, 232, 226-235. 51. M. E. Leonowicz, J. A. Lawton, S. L. Lawton and M. K. Rubin, Science, 1994, 264, 1910-1913. 52. A. Corma, V. Fornes, J. M. Guil, S. Pergher, T. L. M. Maesen and J. G. Buglass, Micropor Mesopor Mat, 2000, 38, 301-309. 53. F. S. O. Ramos, M. K. de Pietre and H. O. Pastore, Rsc Adv, 2013, 3, 2084-2111. 54. W. J. Roth and J. Cejka, Catal Sci Technol, 2011, 1, 43-53. 55. 臺灣大學化學系黃崇銘碩士論文, 2014. 56. C. C. Chang, F. Jin, L. Y. Jang, J. F. Lee and S. Cheng, Catal Sci Technol, 2016, 6, 7631-7642. 57. A. Albuquerque, H. O. Pastore and L. Marchese, in Molecular Sieves: From Basic Research to Industrial Applications, Pts a and B, eds. J. Cejka, N. Zilkova and P. Nachtigall, 2005, vol. 158, pp. 901-908. 58. A. Corma, U. Diaz, V. Fornes, J. M. Guil, J. Martinez-Triguero and E. J. Creyghton, Journal of Catalysis, 2000, 191, 218-224. 59. F. Q. Chu, B. C. Lin, T. Y. Feng, C. Y. Wang, S. Zhang, N. Y. Yuan, Z. F. Liu and J. N. Ding, J Membrane Sci, 2015, 496, 31-38. 60. T. Yu, in Electrochemical Polymer Electrolyte Membranes, CRC Press, 2015, pp. 1-60. 61. L. Rubatat, A. L. Rollet, G. Gebel and O. Diat, Macromolecules, 2002, 35, 4050-4055. 62. J. A. Elliott, D. S. Wu, S. J. Paddison and R. B. Moore, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 6820-6827. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69072 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 直接甲醇燃料電池是一種使用甲醇作為發電的燃料,利用質子交換膜做為電解質的燃料電池,其優點在於甲醇方便攜帶與其高能源密度可以致使較低的環境汙染;缺點在於反應中間產物一氧化碳CO會有毒化觸媒電極的問題,因此需要增加單位活性面積的觸媒含量,使得DMFC價格較昂貴;而且甲醇會經由質子交換膜從陽極穿透至陰極,降低電壓及電池功率。
本研究嘗試合成無機沸石材料MCM-22,其屬於MWW層狀堆疊結構,經由不同的修飾與處理將其以不同方法添加在杜邦公司所生產的Nafion®質子交換膜中,希望能藉此阻擋住甲醇穿透與提升質子的傳導率;研究的第一部分會製備初合成的MCM-22(P),再經由鍛燒將層之間連結起來形成MCM-22,並利用反微胞方法使層與層之間結構撐開後再分散(disperse)可形成dis-MCM-22,再經由萃取和嫁接磺酸根等步驟合成ex-dis-MCM-22和SO3H-dis-MCM-22等材料,另外dis-MCM-22經由鍛燒可形成堆疊方式較不同的ITQ-2。第二部分則是將MCM-22(P)等衍生材料與Nafion膜形成複合膜,會利用溶劑揮發法(Solvent recasting)和旋轉塗佈法(Spin coating)兩種方式製備並比較其在甲醇燃料電池的電性效果與複合膜的性質。 合成出的MCM-22(P)等衍生材料會經由X光粉末繞射儀(XRD)、掃描式電子顯微鏡(SEM)、熱重分析儀(TGA)、元素分析儀(EA)和氮氣吸脫附恆溫曲線儀(BET)等儀器做性質的鑑定,而製備出的複合膜則會經由掃描式電子顯微鏡(SEM)、動態熱機械分析儀(DMA)、小角度X光散射(SAXS)鑑定複合膜的性質,並用甲醇擴散實驗量測甲醇穿透率、利用交流阻抗儀量測阻抗來換算出質子傳導率,並量測含水量和離子交換容積(IEC),最後組成單電池的電極組量測直接甲醇燃料電池的功率密度;而實驗結果看到以溶劑揮發法製備的MCM-22(P)和dis-MCM-22複合膜其甲醇穿透和質子傳導率都隨著材料添加有下降的趨勢;而ex-MCM-22(P)、SO3H-dis-MCM-22和ITQ-2複合膜則有相反的趨勢,其餘複合膜則較無規律;單電池的功率密度在MCM-22(P)、MCM-22的複合膜有最高數值,可達約120 mW cm-2,相較於添加材料前的reacsting膜只有72 mW cm-2,而商業用Nafion®117則是90 mW cm-2。另外以旋轉塗佈法製備的數組複合膜,其功率密度大約落在60-80 mW cm-2左右,以複合膜的性質鑑定結果,推測單電池的發電效率和複合膜的機械強度性質有關,膜必須要和觸媒層表面有良好的銜接,才能發揮最大的效率,因此越軟越有彈性的複合膜,其功率密度皆較高。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) are a subcategory of proton-exchange fuel cells which methanol is used as the fuel. The advantage of DMFCs is the east of transport methanol, a higher energy-density and caused lower environmental pollution. The disadvantages of DMFCs are that the intermediate product carbon monoxide is a poison to catalyst which lead to the increase in Pt and Ru contents of the catalyst so that DMFCs is more expensive. Moreover, methanol permeation from anode to cathode decreases the cell voltage and power efficiency
MCM-22 is a zeolite with stacked MWW layers. In the present study, MCM-22 materials after different treatments were used as inorganic fillers in Nafion® membranes in order to block methanol permeability for the application in direct methanol fuel cell. Treatments of MCM-22 included calcination of as-synthesized MCM-22(P) at 560 ℃ to obtain MCM-22, dispersion of MWW layers by an inverse-micelle method to obtain dis-MCM-22, and calcination of dis-MCM-22 to obtain ITQ-2. The dis-MCM-22 was also modified by grafting with propylsulfonic acid groups. Two different ways were applied to prepare Nafion®/MCM-22 composite membranes. Solvent recasting method would disperse inorganic fillers homogeneously in Nafion® matrix, while spin-coating method would coat the inorganic species on one side surface of Nafion® membrane. The materials were characterized by XRD, TGA, EA, BET and SEM. The properties of resulting composite membranes were examined with DMA, SAXS, water uptake, ion exchange capacity, methanol permeability, proton conductivity, and single cell test. Methanol permeability and proton conductivity of the composite membranes filled with MCM-22(P) and dis-MCM-22 prepared by solvent recasting method decreased with the increasing amounts of fillers, while those filled with ex-MCM-22(P), SO3H-dis-MCM-22 and ITQ-2 had the opposite trend. The values had no significant difference for the membrane filled with MCM-22, ex-dis-MCM-22 and SO3H-ex-dis-MCM-22. The membranes filled with dis-MCM-22 gave the lowest methanol permeabilities among all. SC-MCM-22(P) and SC-dis-MCM-22 composite membranes prepared by spin coating method had lower methanol permeabilities and higher proton conductivity than membranes prepared by solvent recasting method. As to the single cell test, the membranes filled with MCM-22(P) and MCM-22 gave the highest power densities around 120 mW cm-2, which was higher than 72 mW cm-2 of the cell assembled with recasting Nafion® membrane. On the other hand, the single cell with SC-MCM-22(P), SC-dis-MCM-22, ITQ-2 and MCM-22 membranes gave relatively low power densities around 60-80 mW cm-2. It is attributed to that the latter membranes were harder than those prepared by recasting. The key factor affecting the power density of single cell turns out to be the mechanical strength of composite membranes. Soft membrane facilitates single cell assembly and good contact between the electrodes and electrolyte membrane. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:50:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04223159-1.pdf: 6891097 bytes, checksum: 15dd63446bf6dc47c7982b5e636301c2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
謝誌 i 中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS vi LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF TABLES xvii Chapter 1 緒論 18 1.1 燃料電池 18 1.1.1 燃料電池發展史 18 1.1.2 燃料電池構造 20 1.1.3 燃料電池分類 21 1.2 直接甲醇燃料電池 23 1.2.1 直接甲醇燃料電池構造 23 1.2.2 影響直接甲醇燃料電池的因素 26 1.3 質子交換膜 29 1.3.1 質子交換膜簡介 29 1.3.2 全氟磺酸質子交換膜 30 1.3.3 質子交換膜發展現況 34 1.4 沸石材料 42 1.4.1 MCM-22簡介 42 1.5 研究動機 45 Chapter 2 實驗方法 46 2.1 化學藥品 46 2.2 無機孔洞材料之製備 47 2.2.1 合成MCM-22(P)及衍生物 47 2.3 Nafion複合膜之製備 48 2.3.1 乾式負載法 48 2.3.2 濕式負載法 48 2.3.3 旋轉塗佈(Spin Coating)法 49 2.4 複合膜之清洗 50 2.4.1 複合膜之清洗步驟 50 2.5 MCM-22(P)等材料鑑定 50 2.5.1 X光粉末繞射 (Powder X-ray diffraction, XRD) 50 2.5.2 掃描式電子顯微鏡 (Scanning electron microscopy, SEM) 51 2.5.3 熱重分析 (Thermal Gravimetric Analysis, TGA) 51 2.5.4 元素分析 (Elemental Analyzer, EA) 52 2.5.5 氮氣吸附-脫附恆溫曲線 (N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm) 52 2.6 複合膜之鑑定 56 2.6.1 掃描式電子顯微鏡 (Scanning electron microscopy, SEM) 56 2.6.2 動態熱機械分析 (Dynamic mechanical analysis, DMA) 56 2.6.3 小角度X光散射 (Small Angle X-ray Scattering, SAXS) 57 2.7 甲醇穿透率 (Methanol permeability) 58 2.8 質子傳導度 (Proton Conductivity) 60 2.8.1 實驗方法 63 2.9 直接甲醇燃料電池單電池測量 64 2.10 含水量(Water Uptake)測試 66 2.11 離子交換容積(Ion Exchange Capacity)測試 66 Chapter 3 結果與討論 68 3.1 MCM-22(P)及衍生材料鑑定 68 3.1.1 MCM-22(P)及衍生材料之物理化學鑑定 68 3.2 複合膜經由溶劑揮發法(solvent recasting)與旋轉塗佈法(Spin coating)之鑑定 75 3.2.1 複合膜之分散性鑑定 75 3.2.2 複合膜之離子團簇大小鑑定 82 3.2.3 Nafion®117及recasting膜之單電池測試 84 3.2.4 脫層前材料所合成Nafion®/MCM-22(P)等複合膜鑑定與比較 85 3.2.5 脫層後材料所合成Nafion®/dis-MCM-22等複合膜鑑定與比較 103 3.3 膜厚對複合膜之影響 129 3.4 降低材料添加量於複合膜之比較 129 3.5 改變旋轉塗佈法溶液濃度與次數之比較 130 3.6 綜合性比較 131 Chapter 4 結論 133 REFERENCES 134 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 利用溶劑揮發法與旋轉塗佈法合成Nafion®/MCM-22複合膜應用於直接甲醇燃料電池 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Nafion®/MCM-22 Composite Membranes for DMFC Prepared Using Solvent Recasting and Spin-coating Methods | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳貴賢,陳浩銘 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 直接甲醇燃料電池,MCM-22,NafionR,溶劑揮發法,旋轉塗佈法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | DMFC,MCM-22,NafionR,spin-coating,solvent recasting,Fuel cells, | en |
dc.relation.page | 137 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703415 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 化學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 化學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.73 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。