請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69014
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳逸民(Yih-Min Wu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ting Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李伊婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:47:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aki, K. (1984). Asperities, barriers, characteristic earthquakes and strong motion prediction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 89(B7), 5867-5872.
Biq, C. (1965). The east Taiwan rift. Petroleum Geology of Taiwan, 4, 93-106. Chan, C. H., & Wu, Y. M. (2012). A seismicity burst following the 2010M 6.4 Jiashian earthquake-Implications for short-term seismic hazards in southern Taiwan. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 59, 231-239. Chang, C. H., Wu, Y. M., Shin, T. C., & Wang, C. Y. (2000). Relocation of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Terrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 11(3), 581-590. Chang, C. H., Wu, Y. M., Zhao, L., & Wu, F. T. (2007). Aftershocks of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake: The first hour. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(4), 1245-1258. Chen, K. C., Huang, B. S., Wang, J. H., & Yen, H. Y. (2002). Conjugate thrust faulting associated with the 1999 Chi‐Chi, Taiwan, earthquake sequence. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(8). Chen, W. S., Yen, I. C., Fengler, K. P., Rubin, C. M., Yang, C. C., Yang, H. C., Chang, H. C., Lin, C. W., Lin, W. H., Liu, Y. C., & Lin, Y. H. (2007). Late Holocene Paleoearthquake Activity along the Juisui Fault of the Middle Longitudinal Valley Fault. Eastern Taiwan: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 264, 420-437. Chi, W. C., Dreger, D., & Kaverina, A. (2001). Finite-source modeling of the 1999 Taiwan (Chi-Chi) earthquake derived from a dense strong-motion network. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(5), 1144-1157. Chuang, R. Y., Johnson, K. M., Wu, Y. M., Ching, K. E., & Kuo, L. C. (2013). A midcrustal ramp-fault structure beneath the Taiwan tectonic wedge illuminated by the 2013 Nantou earthquake series. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(19), 5080-5084. Davis, S. D., & Frohlich, C. (1991). Single‐link cluster analysis of earthquake aftershocks: Decay laws and regional variations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 96(B4), 6335-6350. Dewey, J. W. (1971). Seismicity studies with the method of joint hypocenter determination (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley). Douglas, A. (1967). Joint epicenter determination. Nature, 215, 47-48. Frohlich, C., & Apperson, K. D. (1992). Earthquake focal mechanisms, moment tensors, and the consistency of seismic activity near plate boundaries. Tectonics, 11(2), 279-296. Geiger, L. (1912). Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicenters from the arrival time only. Bull. St. Louis Univ, 8(1), 56-71. Gutenberg, B., & Richter, C. F. (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34(4), 185-188. Hardebeck, J. L., & Shearer, P. M. (2002). A new method for determining first-motion focal mechanisms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(6), 2264-2276. Hung, J., Wu, Y., Yeh, E., Wu, J., & Party, T. S. (2007). Subsurface structure, physical properties, and fault zone characteristics in the scientific drill holes of Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project. Terrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 18(2), 271-293. Ho, C. (1988). An introduction to the geology of Taiwan. Ministry of Economic Affairs Taiwan, Central Geological Survey. Hsu, M. T. (1971). Seismicity of Taiwan and some related problems. Bulletin of the International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 8, 41-160. Hsu, Y. J., Yu, S. B., Kuo, L. C., Tsai, Y. C., & Chen, H. Y. (2011). Coseismic deformation of the 2010 Jiashian, Taiwan earthquake and implications for fault activities in southwestern Taiwan. Tectonophysics, 502(3), 328-335. Kim, K. H., Chiu, J. M., Pujol, J., & Chen, K. C. (2006). Polarity reversal of active plate boundary and elevated oceanic upper mantle beneath the collision suture in central eastern Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(3), 796-806. Kuochen, H., Wu, Y. M., Chang, C. H., Hu, J. C., & Chen, W. S. (2004). Relocation of Eastern Taiwan Earthquakes and Tectonic Implications. Terr. Atmos. Oceanic Sci., 15, 647-666. Kuochen, H., Wu, Y. M., Chen, Y. G., & Chen, R. Y. (2007). 2003 Mw6. 8 Chengkung earthquake and its related seismogenic structures. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 31(3), 332-339. Lay, T., & Kanamori, H. (1981). An asperity model of large earthquake sequences. Earthquake prediction, 579-592. Lee, W. H. K., & Lahr, J. C. (1972). HYPO71: A computer program for determining hypocenter, magnitude, and first motion pattern of local earthquakes (No. 72-224). US Geological Survey. Lee, S. J., Mozziconacci, L., Liang, W. T., Hsu, Y. J., Huang, W. G., & Huang, B. S. (2013). Source complexity of the 4 March 2010 Jiashian, Taiwan, Earthquake determined by joint inversion of teleseismic and near field data. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 64, 14-26. Lee, S. J., Yeh, T. Y., & Lin, Y. Y. (2016). Anomalously large ground motion in the 2016 M L 6.6 Meinong, Taiwan, earthquake: A synergy effect of source rupture and site amplification. Seismological Research Letters, 87(6), 1319-1326. Lin, A. T., Wang, S., Hung, J., Wu, M., & Liu, C. (2007). Lithostratigraphy of the Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project-A borehole and its neighboring region, central Taiwan. Terrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 18(2), 223-241. Lin, C. W., Chang, H. C., Lu, S. T., Shih, T. S., & Huang, W. J. (2000). An introduction to the active faults of Taiwan. Spec. Publ. Cent. Geol. Surv, 13, 122pp. Ma, K. F., Chan, C. H., & Stein, R. S. (2005). Response of seismicity to Coulomb stress triggers and shadows of the 1999 Mw = 7.6 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110(B5), B05S19. Ma, K. F., Tanaka, H., Song, S. R., Wang, C. Y., Hung, J. H., Tsai, Y. B., Mori, J., Song, Y. F., Yeh, E. C., Soh, W., Sone, H., Kuo, L. W., & Wu, H. Y. (2006). Slip zone and energetics of a large earthquake from the Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project. Nature, 444, 473-476. Oglesby, D. D., & Day, S. M. (2001). Fault geometry and the dynamics of the 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(5), 1099-1111. Rau, R. J., Lee, J. C., Ching, K. E., Lee, Y. H., Byrne, T. B., & Chen, R. Y. (2012). Subduction-continent collision in southwestern Taiwan and the 2010 Jiashian earthquake sequence. Tectonophysics, 578, 107-116. Seno, T. (1977). The instantaneous rotation vector of the Philippine Sea plate relative to the Eurasian plate. Tectonophysics, 42(2-4), 209-226. Shyu, J. B. H., Sieh, K., Chen, Y. G., & Liu, C. S. (2005). Neotectonic architecture of Taiwan and its implications for future large earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110(B8), 402-433. Stoddard, P. R., & Woods, M. T. (1990). Master event relocation of Gorda block earthquakes: Implications for deformation. Geophysical Research Letters, 17(7), 961-964. Wang, C. Y., Li, C. L., Su, F. C., Leu, M. T., Wu, M. S., Lai, S. H., & Chern, C. C. (2002). Structural mapping of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake fault, Taiwan by seismic reflection methods. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 13(3), 211-226. Wiemer, S., & Wyss, M. (2000). Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the western United States, and Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(4), 859-869. Wiltschko, D. V., Hassler, L., Hung, J. H., & Liao, H. S. (2010). From accretion to collision: motion and evolution of the Chaochou Fault, southern Taiwan. Tectonics, 29(2). Wu, Y. M., Chang, C. H., Hsiao, N. C., & Wu, F. T. (2003). Relocation of the 1998 Rueyli, Taiwan, earthquake sequence using three-dimensions velocity structure with stations corrections. Terrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 14(4), 421-430. Wu, Y. M., & Chiao, L. Y. (2006). Seismic Quiescence before the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Mw 7.6 Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(1), 321-327. Wu, Y. M., & Chen, C. C. (2007). Seismic reversal pattern for the 1999 Chi-chi, Taiwan, Mw 7.6 earthquake. Tectonophysics, 429(1), 125-132. Wu, Y. M., Chen, C. C., Zhao, L., & Chang, C. H. (2008a). Seismicity characteristics before the 2003 Chengkung, Taiwan, earthquake. Tectonophysics, 457(3), 177-182. Wu, Y. M., Chang, C. H., Zhao, L., Teng, T. L., & Nakamura, M. (2008b). A comprehensive relocation of earthquakes in Taiwan from 1991 to 2005. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98(3), 1471-1481. Wu, Y. M., Zhao, L., Chang, C. H., & Hsu, Y. J. (2008c). Focal-mechanism determination in Taiwan by genetic algorithm. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98(2), 651-661. Wu, Y. M., Zhao, L., Chang, C. H., Hsiao, N. C., Chen, Y. G., & Hsu, S. K. (2009a). Relocation of the 2006 Pingtung earthquake sequence and seismotectonics in Southern Taiwan. Tectonophysics, 479(1), 19-27. Wu, Y. M., Shyu, J. B. H., Chang, C. H., Zhao, L., Nakamura, M., & Hsu, S. K. (2009b). Improved seismic tomography offshore northeastern Taiwan: implications for subduction and collision processes between Taiwan and the southernmost Ryukyu. Geophysical Journal International, 178(2), 1042-1054. Wyss, M., Hasegawa, A., Wiemer, S., & Umino, N. (1999). Quantitative mapping of precursory seismic quiescence before the 1989, M 7.1 off-Sanriku earthquake, Japan. Ann. Di Geofis., 42, 851-869. Yih-Hsiung, Y., Eric, B., Lin, C. H., & Jacques, A. (1991). Stress tensor analysis in the Taiwan area from focal mechanisms of earthquakes. Tectonophysics, 200(1-3), 267-280. Yue, L. F., Suppe, J., & Hung, J. H. (2005). Structural geology of a classic thrust belt earthquake: the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake Taiwan (Mw = 7.6). Journal of Structural Geology, 27(11), 2058-2083. Yu, S. B., & Chen, H. Y. (1994). Global positioning system measurements of crustal deformation in the Taiwan arc-continent collision zone. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 5(4), 477-498. Yu, S. B., Chen, H. Y., & Kuo, L. C. (1997). Velocity field of GPS stations in the Taiwan area. Tectonophysics, 274(1), 41-59. Yu, S. B., & Kuo, L. C. (2001). Present-day crustal motion along the Longitudinal Valley Fault, eastern Taiwan. Tectonophysics, 333(1), 199-217. 何春蓀,(1982)。臺灣地體構造的演變:臺灣地體構造圖說明書。中華民國經濟部。 許雅儒,(2004)。集集地震之震前,同震及震後變形模式研究。中央大學地球物理研究所博士論文,共133頁。 許雅儒,(2013)。2013/06/02地震GPS 同震位移及斷層滑移分佈。2013/06/02南投地震學術討論會。 陳文山,林益正 顏一勤,楊志成,紀權窅,黃能偉,林啟文,林偉雄,侯進雄,劉彥求,石同生,盧詩丁& 林燕慧, (2008)。從古地震研究與 GPS 資料探討縱谷斷層的分段意義。經濟部中央地質調查所特,(20),165-191。 陳棋炫,(2014)。臺灣地區潛在致災地震 (規模≥ 6.0) 之研究:發震機制及地震統計觀點。臺灣大學地質科學研究所博士論文,共97頁。 陳燕玲,(1995)。台灣地區三維速度構造與隱沒構造之相關探討,中央大學地球物理研究所碩士論文,共 172 頁。 黃信樺,(2007)。台灣東北地區的地震構造:由碰撞末期轉變為隱沒拉張之構造特性。臺灣大學地質科學研究所碩士論文,共110頁。 蔣盼忻,(2014)。2012 霧台地震同震變形及震源區應力狀態分析。中央大學地球科學系碩士論文,共87頁。 饒瑞鈞,(2016)。2016 年高雄美濃地震-震後科學調查。中華民國科技部。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69014 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 中央氣象局監測臺灣地區之地震於2012年開始使用新一代觀測系統,本研究將採用其2012至2016年的地震目錄,討論期間ML > 6.0的地震及其在構造上的特性。研究得知新觀測系統的更新,添補了中央氣象局地震目錄的微震資料(ML 2.0以下),讓島內最小完整地震規模(Mc)可達到更小,本研究5個案例的震源區,其Mc就下降為0.8至1.2。在b值方面,新舊系統不會對其造成太大的差異,但在小規模地震的數據更為完整。
(1)2012年02/26霧台地震序列:主要餘震序列集中在一個7.5公里乘10公里的橢圓型範圍,震源深度集中在20到30公里,且該區為1994年至2011年地震缺乏區域。本研究求得的主震震源機制解為向北傾約55度的逆斷層,並沿著一個近北北西-南南東走向的破裂面滑動,這和淺部地殼南北走向的拉張應力構造截然不同,但其發震構造和深度與2010年的甲仙地震相似,認為本次地震與甲仙地震有關,皆為板塊擠壓應力造成的下部地殼破裂。(2)2013年的03/27及06/02南投地震序列:兩群序列的主要餘震皆分布於20公里乘20公里,深度10至20公里間,主震震源機制解皆為近南北走向且向東傾30度的逆斷層。1999年921集集地震規模6以上的餘震幾乎坐落在這兩次南投地震群的東側和深度上界,推測深度於20至30公里間應存在一個破裂面,且該破裂面可能與921集集地震中較深的餘震有關。(3)2013年10/31瑞穗地震序列:由一個高角度約60度向西傾的構造面破裂所致,餘震序列位在1994年至2011年的地震空白帶,係作為縱谷的南北構造的分界。透過速度構造模型,推測本案例是未破裂至地表的邊界斷層錯動造成,該斷層可能為中央山脈系統斷層之一。(4)在2016年02/06美濃地震序列:此餘震序列分布廣泛,然中央山脈淺層所發生的正斷層地震群,應為被觸發,而非美濃地震相關構造。本研究求得的主震震源機制為低角度向北傾、近東西走向的解,但餘震分布較為複雜,還需要更進一步的研究。從主震區餘震位置和震源機制,推測可能與附近的甲仙地震構造有關,也就是臺灣南部較深層的應力釋放造成此次地震。 上述5個案例中,a值無特定規律。震前1年的b值,除了霧台地震因反應淺層拉張的背景地震,使得b值高達1.44外,其他案例都在1.0以內。震後b值落在0.62至0.73:霧台及美濃都在0.7以上,東部瑞穗是0.7,中部兩個南投是0.7以下。震後b值相對震前的變化皆為下降,下降幅度從0.12到0.71,b值變化量因部分案例發生在背景地震缺乏區域,故無法看出與地區的相關性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | A new of seismic network of the Central Weather Bureau (CWB) has been used to monitor the seismicity in Taiwan since 2012. The new seismic network includes more stations than the old system. Thus, it can detect much more small earthquakes. The magnitude completeness (Mc) of the old system is about 2.0. The Mc of the new system can research 0.8 to 1.2. It provides a nice dataset to study the seismotectonics of earthquake sequence. In this study, the seismic catalog of the new system was used to discuss the characteristics of the ML > 6.0 earthquakes during 2012 to 2016.
(1) 2012/02/26 Wutai earthquake sequence: The distribution of earthquakes concentrate in the 7.5x10 km region and depth from 20 to 30 km. This zone is a low seismic activity zone during 1994 to 2011. The fault plane is a nearly SE-NW, dip angle is 55o to the northeastward. It is a blind fault in the lower crust and does not correlate to the surface geological structures. (2) 2013/02/27 and 2013/06/02 two Nantou earthquake sequences: The focal mechanisms of both earthquakes are thrust with strike nearly N-S direction and dipping to east with an angle about 30o. These two events are located within regions of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake aftershocks. These two events could be aftershocks of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. (3) 2013/10/31 Ruisui earthquake sequences: Fault plane of this event strike is parallel to the Longitudinal Valley and dips to the west. It could be correlated the Central Mountain fault system and should be a boundary fault. (4) 2016/02/06 Meinong earthquake sequences: Aftershocks of this event distribute at a wide region. However, shallow earthquakes in Central Mountains could be triggered by Meinong earthquake. The fault plane of this event dips to north with a low angle and strike is EW. This event is also a blind fault. It could not be correlated to surface structures. The b value of G-R Law is analyzed in this study. The most of the b values before the occurrence of main shock is around 1.0. The b values of aftershock are between 0.62 to 0.73. The decreasing of the b value could be a physical condition. It also could be contributed by small events did not fully be identified of the aftershocks sequence. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:47:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R01224121-1.pdf: 12367884 bytes, checksum: 2aab406141cb187b052590736ddd4bb7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
致謝 II 中文摘要 III Abstract V 總目錄 VII 圖目錄 IX 表目錄 XI 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與目的 1 1.2 研究內容大綱 2 第二章 資料及地質背景 3 2.1 中央氣象局地震資料 3 2.2 地震目錄與選定資料 7 2.3 地質背景 7 2.3.1霧台及美濃地震的地質背景 7 2.3.2南投地震地質背景 8 2.3.3瑞穗地震地質背景 9 第三章 方法 12 3.1 分析流程 12 3.2 三維聯合震源定位法 14 3.3 餘震序列選取方式 15 3.4 P波初動震源機制解 15 3.5 最小完整規模與b值 16 第四章 結果與討論 18 4.1 CWBSN與CWBSN24定位結果 18 4.2 霧台地震 25 4.2.1結果分析 25 4.2.2討論與小結 26 4.3 南投地震 37 4.3.1結果分析 37 4.3.2討論與小結 40 4.4 瑞穗地震 59 4.4.1結果分析 59 4.4.2討論與小結 60 4.5 美濃地震 74 4.5.1結果分析 74 4.5.2討論與小結 75 4.6 b值討論 86 第五章 結論 89 參考文獻 91 附錄A 震源機制解參數表 98 附錄B 震源機制解圖錄 102 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 利用高倍率地震網探討臺灣地區ML > 6.0的地震構造特性 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Seismotectonic Study of ML > 6.0 Earthquakes in Taiwan Using High Resolution Seismic Network | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭陳澔(Hao Kuo-Chen),黃信樺(Hsin-Hua Huang),張建興(Chien-Hsin Chang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 地震觀測網,災害地震,地震序列,地震重定位, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Seismic network,damage earthquake,earthquake sequence,earthquake relocation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 119 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703476 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 地質科學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 地質科學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 12.08 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。