請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68941
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李財坤(Tsai-Kun Li) | |
dc.contributor.author | Joel-Sean Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 徐兆賢 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:43:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-14 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-09-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | AZAROVA AM, LYU YL, LIN CP, TSAI YC, LAU JY, WANG JC AND LIU LF. 2007. Roles of DNA topoisomerase II isozymes in chemotherapy and secondary malignancies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 11014-11019.
BODLEY A, LIU LF, ISRAEL M, SESHADRI R, KOSEKI Y, GIULIANI FC, KIRSCHENBAUM S, SILBER R AND POTMESIL M. 1989. DNA topoisomerase II-mediated interaction of doxorubicin and daunorubicin congeners with DNA. Cancer Res 49: 5969-5978. BOJANOWSKI K, LELIEVRE S, MARKOVITS J, COUPRIE J, JACQUEMIN-SABLON A AND LARSEN AK. 1992. Suramin is an inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase II in vitro and in Chinese hamster fibrosarcoma cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89: 3025-3029. CUYA SM, BJORNSTI MA AND VAN WAARDENBURG R. 2017. DNA topoisomerase-targeting chemotherapeutics: what's new? Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80: 1-14. DEWEESE JE, OSHEROFF MA AND OSHEROFF N. 2008. DNA Topology and Topoisomerases: Teaching a 'Knotty' Subject. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 37: 2-10. FORTUNE JM AND OSHEROFF N. 2000. Topoisomerase II as a target for anticancer drugs: when enzymes stop being nice. Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology 64: 221-253. GLOVER A, CHUN HG, KLEINMAN LM, COONEY DA, PLOWMAN J, GRIESHABER CK, MALSPEIS L AND LEYLAND-JONES B. 1987. Merbarone: an antitumor agent entering clinical trials. Invest New Drugs 5: 137-143. GOMEZ-HERREROS F ET AL. 2014. TDP2 protects transcription from abortive topoisomerase activity and is required for normal neural function. Nat Genet 46: 516-521. GORMLEY NA, ORPHANIDES G, MEYER A, CULLIS PM AND MAXWELL A. 1996. The interaction of coumarin antibiotics with fragments of DNA gyrase B protein. Biochemistry 35: 5083-5092. HAFFNER MC ET AL. 2010. Androgen-induced TOP2B-mediated double-strand breaks and prostate cancer gene rearrangements. Nat Genet 42: 668-675. HU T, SAGE H AND HSIEH TS. 2002. ATPase domain of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase II. Inhibition of ATPase activity by the anti-cancer drug bisdioxopiperazine and ATP/ADP-induced dimerization. The Journal of biological chemistry 277: 5944-5951. HUANG KC, GAO H, YAMASAKI EF, GRABOWSKI DR, LIU S, SHEN LL, CHAN KK, GANAPATHI R AND SNAPKA RM. 2001. Topoisomerase II poisoning by ICRF-193. The Journal of biological chemistry 276: 44488-44494. JU BG, LUNYAK VV, PERISSI V, GARCIA-BASSETS I, ROSE DW, GLASS CK AND ROSENFELD MG. 2006. A topoisomerase IIbeta-mediated dsDNA break required for regulated transcription. Science 312: 1798-1802. KANE RC, MCGUINN WD, JR., DAGHER R, JUSTICE R AND PAZDUR R. 2008. Dexrazoxane (Totect): FDA review and approval for the treatment of accidental extravasation following intravenous anthracycline chemotherapy. Oncologist 13: 445-450. KOZUKI T ET AL. 2017. Roles of the C-terminal domains of topoisomerase IIalpha and topoisomerase IIbeta in regulation of the decatenation checkpoint. Nucleic acids research 45: 5995-6010. KUDO K, YOSHIDA H, KIYOI H, NUMATA S, HORIBE K AND NAOE T. 1998. Etoposide-related acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia 12: 1171-1175. LARSEN AK, ESCARGUEIL AE AND SKLADANOWSKI A. 2003. Catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitors in cancer therapy. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 99: 167-181. LEE CH, HSIEH MY, HSIN LW, CHEN HC, LO SC, FAN JR, CHEN WR, CHEN HW, CHAN NL AND LI TK. 2012. Anthracenedione-methionine conjugates are novel topoisomerase II-targeting anticancer agents with favorable drug resistance profiles. Biochem Pharmacol 83: 1208-1216. LI TK AND LIU LF. 2001. Tumor cell death induced by topoisomerase-targeting drugs. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology 41: 53-77. LINKA RM, PORTER AC, VOLKOV A, MIELKE C, BOEGE F AND CHRISTENSEN MO. 2007. C-terminal regions of topoisomerase IIalpha and IIbeta determine isoform-specific functioning of the enzymes in vivo. Nucleic acids research 35: 3810-3822. MADABHUSHI R ET AL. 2015. Activity-Induced DNA Breaks Govern the Expression of Neuronal Early-Response Genes. Cell 161: 1592-1605. MCGOWAN JV, CHUNG R, MAULIK A, PIOTROWSKA I, WALKER JM AND YELLON DM. 2017. Anthracycline Chemotherapy and Cardiotoxicity. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 31: 63-75. NITISS JL. 2009. Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 338-350. PASTOR N, DOMINGUEZ I, ORTA ML, CAMPANELLA C, MATEOS S AND CORTES F. 2012. The DNA topoisomerase II catalytic inhibitor merbarone is genotoxic and induces endoreduplication. Mutat Res 738-739: 45-51. POMMIER Y, LEO E, ZHANG H AND MARCHAND C. 2010. DNA topoisomerases and their poisoning by anticancer and antibacterial drugs. Chem Biol 17: 421-433. POMMIER Y, SUN Y, HUANG SN AND NITISS JL. 2016. Roles of eukaryotic topoisomerases in transcription, replication and genomic stability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17: 703-721. RATAIN MJ AND ROWLEY JD. 1992. Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia secondary to inhibitors of topoisomerase II: from the bedside to the target genes. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 3: 107-111. ROCA J. 1995. The mechanisms of DNA topoisomerases. Trends in biochemical sciences 20: 156-160. ROCA J, ISHIDA R, BERGER JM, ANDOH T AND WANG JC. 1994. Antitumor bisdioxopiperazines inhibit yeast DNA topoisomerase II by trapping the enzyme in the form of a closed protein clamp. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91: 1781-1785. SALZER WL, DEVIDAS M, CARROLL WL, WINICK N, PULLEN J, HUNGER SP AND CAMITTA BA. 2010. Long-term results of the pediatric oncology group studies for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia 1984-2001: a report from the children's oncology group. Leukemia 24: 355-370. SEITER K. 2005. Toxicity of the topoisomerase II inhibitors. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 4: 219-234. SHEN YC, CHANG YT, LIN CL, LIAW CC, KUO YH, TU LC, YEH SF AND CHERN JW. 2011. Synthesis of 1-substituted carbazolyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro- and carbazolyl-3,4-dihydro-beta-carboline analogs as potential antitumor agents. Mar Drugs 9: 256-277. TAHOVER E ET AL. 2017. Dexrazoxane added to doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study with a comparative analysis of toxicity and survival. Anticancer Drugs. TEBBI CK, LONDON WB, FRIEDMAN D, VILLALUNA D, DE ALARCON PA, CONSTINE LS, MENDENHALL NP, SPOSTO R, CHAUVENET A AND SCHWARTZ CL. 2007. Dexrazoxane-associated risk for acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome and other secondary malignancies in pediatric Hodgkin's disease. J Clin Oncol 25: 493-500. WANG JC. 2002. Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 430-440. WU CC, LI TK, FARH L, LIN LY, LIN TS, YU YJ, YEN TJ, CHIANG CW AND CHAN NL. 2011. Structural basis of type II topoisomerase inhibition by the anticancer drug etoposide. Science 333: 459-462. WU CC, LI YC, WANG YR, LI TK AND CHAN NL. 2013. On the structural basis and design guidelines for type II topoisomerase-targeting anticancer drugs. Nucleic acids research 41: 10630-10640. ZHANG S, LIU X, BAWA-KHALFE T, LU LS, LYU YL, LIU LF AND YEH ET. 2012. Identification of the molecular basis of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Nat Med 18: 1639-1642. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68941 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 人類第二型拓樸異構酶(topoisomerase II, Top2)是癌症治療的良好標的目標,而抗第二型拓樸異構酶的藥物可依據藥物作用機轉分為兩類:(一)第二型拓樸異構酶的可切性複合體(Top2 cleavable complex, Top2cc)產生藥物:現行癌症化療藥物,除了抑制第二型拓樸異構酶的酵素活性,由於停留於特別的步驟,造成第二型拓樸異構酶與斷裂DNA共價結構之可切性複合體並且造成短暫DNA雙股斷裂(稱為 Top2 poisoning activity),並主動引發細胞死亡,為腫瘤治療主要療效來源,例:多柔比星(小紅莓,doxorubicin);(二)第二型拓樸異構酶的酵素拮抗劑(Top2-antagonizing inhibitors):其他第二型拓樸異構酶的酵素活性抑制劑,則只抑制酵素活性,其中過程並不產生第二型拓樸異構酶可切性複合體,但可以拮抗可切割性複合體的產生,減低癌症化療藥物的細胞毒殺性,目前有合併治療,使用於減低小紅莓引起的心臟毒性等臨床副作用,例:右雷佐生(dexrazoxane, ICRF-187)。近年研究闡明人類第二型拓樸異構酶包含兩種亞型(α and β isozymes)。先前我們與其他文獻指出在化療中,Top2α亞型主要是抗癌藥物的標的目標並為影響化療的療效的主因與的作用機制(mechanism of action, MOA),而以Top2β亞型的可切性複合體則是造成二度癌化與心臟毒性等副作用的潛在的作用機制。因此,開發β亞型專一性的Top2β酵素拮抗劑,應可以有效減少第二型拓樸異構酶可切性複合體產生藥物所引發的臨床副作用與毒性,但不影響其抗腫瘤療效,有效提升現行藥物的治療指數(therapeutic index, TI),這也是本論文的研究目標。另外,實驗室先前對蒽醌(mitoxantrone)衍生藥物有相當的研究,所以本論文首先聚焦於的蒽醌衍生物上,利用第二型拓樸異構酶的DNA解螺旋(relaxation)和切割(cleavage)生化實驗,我們首先篩選出蒽醌衍生物CL-01和CL-14具有較專一性抑制Top2β第二型拓樸異構酶β亞型解DNA螺旋的能力。不同於蒽醌,CL-01和CL-14只具有很弱的DNA結合力。另外,和Top2可切性複合體產生藥物小紅莓或依托泊苷(etoposide, VP-16)共同作用時,能減低其所造成的 DNA斷裂。為了進一步研究心臟毒性,我們使用HL-1心肌細胞。我們發現在彗星(comet)實驗中,CL-01和CL-14均能夠減少血癌與心肌細胞中被小紅莓或依托泊苷所造成的DNA損傷。CL-01能夠有效的拮抗第二型拓樸異構酶Top2α與Top2β亞型表現的細胞中的DNA損傷;相較於CL-01,CL-14更具有抑制第二型拓樸異構酶Top2β亞型切割複合體產生的能力。最後在動物實驗中,CL-01和CL-14可以防止小紅莓所引起的乳酸去氫酶(LDH, 心毒性指標之一)、天冬氨酸氨基轉移酶(AST, 心毒性指標之一)和丙氨酸基轉移酶(ALT, 心毒性指標之一)上升;同樣地,CL-01和CL-14亦可以防止小紅莓所引起的心肌纖維化(fibrosis, 心毒性指標之一)。而在少量動物實驗結果中,CL-01也有抑制小紅莓所造成的其他副作用,例:骨髓抑制/毒性(myelosuppression/bone marrow toxicity)。結論上,許多蒽醌衍生物,尤其CL-14,具有較偏第二型拓樸異構酶β亞型專一性的抑制能力,能夠減少臨床上使用的第二型拓樸異構酶可切性複合體產生藥物所引起之化療副作用,尤其是心臟與肝臟毒性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Human type II topoisomerases (topoisomerase II, hTop2) have been proven to be an excellent therapeutic target for anti-cancer drugs. Based on underlying mechanism of action (MOA), Top2-targeting agents are classified into two classes: the Top2 cleavable complex (Top2cc)-producing drugs, such as doxorubicin and etoposide, and the Top2-antagonizing inhibitors, such as dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) and aclarubicin. In this regard, the Top2cc-producing drugs inhibit a specific intermediate stage of Top2 catalytic cycle and stabilize transient Top2-linked double-stranded DNA break (DSB) structure termed Top2cc and leading to cell death and anticancer efficacy; while the Top2-antagonizing inhibitors not only interfere Top2 catalytic activity without inducing Top2cc but also antagonize the Top2cc-mediated cytotoxicity caused by Top2cc-producing drugs. It is interesting to note that there are two hTop2 (α and β) isozymes which exhibit distinct functions and properties in mammalian cells. Our and other recent studies suggest that hTop2α is the main MOA target for anti-cancer efficacy, whereas the MOA hTop2β-targeting leads to clinical adverse effects such as cardiotoxicity and 2nd malignancy, that is, hTop2α and hTop2β are MOAs responsible respectively for the anti-cancer efficacy and clinical adverse effects. Therefore, identifications of hTop2β-specific antagonizing inhibitors might create a new revenue for reducing unwanted clinical side effect of the Top2cc-based anti-cancer therapy and improving their therapeutic index, and this is also the specific aim for my dissertation study. Through performing in vitro Top2 relaxation and cleavage assays using purified recombinant hTop2 isozymes, we have screened and found that anthracenediones, such as CL-01 and CL-14, were shown to inhibit hTop2β relaxation activity preferentially and could reduce the hTop2β-mediated DNA breaks when co-treated with two Top2cc-producing drugs, doxorubicin and etoposide. In order to further investigate the adverse effect of cardiotoxicity during doxorubicin therapy, we took advantage of the HL-1 cardiomyocyte. We showed that, in both leukemia cells and cardiomyocytes, CL-01 or CL-14 co-treatments reduced of the Top2cc-mediated DNA damage induced by etoposide and doxorubicin. In addition, compared to CL-01, CL-14 has a better ability to preferentially antagonize Top2βcc formation by etoposide. To study further the isozyme preference, we then employed the RNAi knockdown approach to generate the individual Top2 isozyme-deficient cell lines. Unlike a control ICRF-193 and CL-01, CL-14 was able to antagonize the etoposide-induced and Top2βcc-mediated DNA damage in the Top2α-specific knockdown cells better than the etoposide-induced and Top2αcc-mediated in the Top2β-specific knockdown cells. Lastly, using the animal experimental models, pretreatment of CL-14 effectively relieved the elevated levels of LDH (a serum biomarker for cardiotoxicity), AST, ALT (two serum biomarkers for hepatotoxicity), and also reduce myelosuppression (i.e. bone marrow toxicity), those adverse effects caused by doxorubicin. With the preliminary and limited data, we found that CL-01 also showed abilities to relieve doxorubicin adverse effects. Consistent with the notion that CL-01 and CL-14 can reduce the cardiotoxicity adverse effect induced by doxorubicin, pretreatments of CL-01 and CL-14 could both reduce the doxorubicin-mediated heart tissue fibrosis using the Masson trichrome staining. Taken together, anthracenediones, especially CL-14, may be a good potential as the hTop2βcc-specific antagonizing inhibitor to reduce adverse effects caused by the clinically useful Top2cc-producing anticancer drugs. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:43:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04445110-1.pdf: 3161171 bytes, checksum: b7302603f4eab949315b518645d1b3d1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I
中文摘要 II ABSTRACT IV CONTENTS VI INTRODUCTION 1 1. DNA Topoisomerases 1 1.1 Type II DNA topoisomerases 1 1.2 Human topoisomerase II and it’s catalytic mechanism 1 1.3 Isozymes of human topoisomerase II 2 2. Topoisomerase II targeting agents as anticancer drug 2 2.1 Mechanisms of Top2 inhibition 3 2.2 Classification of Top2 clinical cancer drugs 4 3. Roles of Top2 isozymes in cancer therapy and adverse effects 4 3.1 Adverse effects cause by Top2-targeting agents 5 3.2 Top2β inhibitors on reducing therapy related adverse effects 5 3.3 Potential Top2 isozyme-specific targeting agents 6 SPECIFIC AIM 7 MATERIALS AND METHODS 8 Chemical compounds, plasmid and cell lines 8 Antibodies and immunoblotting analysis 8 Cytotoxicity assay (MTT assay) 9 Recombinant human Topoisomerase II isozyme purification 9 Topoisomerase II relaxation assay 10 Topoisomerase II cleavage assay 11 Alkaline single cell gel-electrophoresis (comet) assay 11 In vivo complexes of Enzyme (ICE) bioassay 12 DNA binding assay 12 Lentivirus production and Lentivirus-based RNA interference (RNAi) 13 Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in mouse model 13 RESULTS 14 1. Identification of new anthracenedione derivatives as potential Top2-antagonizing inhibitors 14 2. CL-01 and CL-14 had a stronger preference toward hTop2β inhibition in the in vitro relaxation assay using hTop2α and hTop2β core enzymes 14 3. CL-01 and CL-14 preferred to reduce the DNA damage induced by hTop2β rather than hTop2α in in vitro cleavage assay. 16 4. CL-01 and CL-14 exhibited weak DNA intercalating ability. 17 5. CL-01 and CL-14 did not induce chromosomal DNA breaks and slightly decreased the DNA damage caused by VP-16 in the HL-60 cell line 18 6. CL-01 and CL-14 did not induce chromosomal DNA breaks, but could slightly decrease DNA damage caused by doxorubicin in HL-1 cardiomyocyte. 19 7. CL-01 and CL-14 were able to preferentially antagonize the VP-16 and likely hTop2β-mediated DNA breaks in the hTop2α-specific knockdown cells, but less efficient in the hTop2β-specific knockdown cells 19 8. Like ICRF-193, CL-01 antagonized both the VP-16-inducted hTop2αcc and hTop2βcc formation in HL-60 cell. 20 9. CL-14 antagonized VP-16-mediated Top2β formation in HL-60 cell. 21 10. CL-14 protected doxorubicin-mediated weight-loss, toxicities and adverse effects induced by Top2-producing drugs in the mouse models. 22 11. CL-01 and CL-14 protected heart fibrosis mediated by doxorubicin. 23 DISCUSSIONS 25 FIGURES AND TABLES 29 Table 1: The cytotoxicity of anthracenedione derivatives in HL-60 and intensity of inducing DNA breakage. 29 Table 2: The Top2-targeting potential and isozymes inhibition ability of anthracenedione derivatives. 30 Figure 1. Full-length hTop2 isozymes were successfully expressed in yeast-expressing system. 32 Figure 2. Full-length hTop2 isozymes were purified from yeast-expressing system. 35 Figure 3. Purified full-length hTop2 isozymes were able to relax supercoiled DNA 36 Figure 4. CL-01 and CL-14 preferentially inhibited the relaxation ability of hTop2β compared to that of hTop2α in vitro. 38 Figure 5. The VP-16-induced and hTop2β-mediated cleavage was antagonized by CL-01 or CL-14 co-treatments. 40 Figure 6. CL-01 and CL-14 are both weak DNA-binding agents compared to mitoxantrone 41 Figure 7. CL-01 and CL-14 did not induce chromosomal DNA breaks and only slightly decreased the VP-16-induced DNA damage in the HL-60 cells. 43 Figure 8. CL-01 and CL-14 also antagonized DNA damage caused by doxorubicin in the HL-1 cardiomyocytes. 45 Figure 9. CL-01 and CL-14 were able to antagonized the VP-16-induced and mainly hTop2β-mediated chromosomal DNA breaks in the hTop2α-specific cells. 47 Figure 10. CL-01 reduced the formation of both Top2αcc and Top2βcc induced by VP-16 in HL-60 cells. 49 Figure 11. CL-14 prefers to reduce the formation and hTop2βcc rather than hTop2αcc in HL-60 cells. 51 Figure 12. Both CL-01 and CL-14 prevented the chemotherapy-caused weight-loss by doxorubicin in a mouse model. 52 Figure 13. CL-14 reduced the VP-16-induced adverse effect of myelosuppression and is a potential bone marrow-protecting agent. 53 Figure 14. CL-14 had slight effect on reducing hepatotoxicity mediated by doxorubicin. 55 Figure 15. CL-01 and CL-14 were able to reduce LDH level and heart fibrosis mediated by doxorubicin. 58 REFERENCES 59 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 第二型拓樸異構酶IIβ抑制藥物用以減少化療副作用之開發 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Identification and characterization of Topoisomerase 2β-specific catalytic inhibitors on reducing therapy-related adverse effects | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹迺立(Nei-Li Chan),陳文彬(Wen-Pin Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 拓樸異構?,化療副作用,??, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Topoisomerase,chemothreapy adverse effects,anthracenedione, | en |
dc.relation.page | 62 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703452 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 微生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 微生物學科所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.09 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。