請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68890
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蕭旭峰(Shiuh-Feng Shiao) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-chueh Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林偉爵 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:40:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Allen LE, Barry KL, Holwell GI. 2012. Mate location and antennal morphology in the praying mantid Hierodula majuscula. Aust J Entomol 51:133-140.
Andrade MCB. 1998. Female hunger can explain variation in cannibalistic behaviour despite male sacrifice in redback spiders. Behav Ecol 36:33-42. Arnqvist G, Henriksson S. 1997. Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints. Evol Ecol 11:255-273. Barry KL. 2010. The Evolution of Sexual Cannibalism. SciTopics. Retrieved May 16, 2013, http://www.scitopics.com/The_Evolution_of_Sexual_Cannibalism.html Barry KL. 2015. Sexual deception in a cannibalistic mating system? Testing the femme fatale hypothesis. Proc Biol Sci 282:20141428. Barry KL, Holwell GI, Herberstein ME. 2008. Female praying mantids use sexual cannibalism as a foraging strategy to increase fecundity. Behav Ecol 19:710-715. Barry KL, Holwell GI, Herberstein ME. 2009. Male mating behaviour reduces the risk of sexual cannibalism in an Australian praying mantid. J Ethol 27:377-383. Barry KL, Holwell GI, Herberstein ME. 2010. Multimodal mate assessment by male praying mantids in a sexually cannibalistic mating system. Anim Behav 79:1165-1172. Barry KL, Holwell GI, Herberstein ME. 2011. A paternity advantage for speedy males? Sperm precedence patterns and female re-mating frequencies in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantid. Evol Ecol 25:107-119. Bateson P, Laland KN. 2013. Tinbergen's four questions: an appreciation and an update. Trend Ecol Evol 28:712-718. Battiston R. 2008. Mating behavior of the mantid Ameles decolor (Insecta, Mantodea): courtship and cannibalism. J Ortho Research 17:29-33. Birkhead TR, Lee KE, Young P. 1988. Sexual cannibalism in the praying mantis Hierodula membranacea. Behav 106:112-118. Brown WD, Muntz GA, Ladowski AJ. 2012. Low mate encounter rate increases male risk taking in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantis. PLoS One 7:e35377. Buskirk RE, Frohlich C, Ross KG. 1984. The natural selection of sexual cannibalism. The Am Nat 123:612-625. Dick JTA. 1995. The cannibalistic behavior of two Gammarus species (Crustacea: Amphipoda). J Zool 236:697-706. Elgar MA. 1992. Sexual cannibalism in spiders and other invertebrates. Elgar MA, Crespi BJ, editors Oxford: Oxford Sceince Publication. Fox LR. 1975. Cannibalism in natural populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 6:87-106. Herberstein ME, Schneider JM, Elgar MA. 2002. Costs of courtship and mating in a sexually cannibalistic orb-web spider: female mating strategies and their consequences for males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:440-446. Holwell GI, Barry KL, Herberstein ME. 2007. Mate location, antennal morphology and ecology in two praying mantids (Insecta: Mantodea). Biol J Linn Soc 91:307-313. Hurd LE, Eisenberg RM, Fagan WF, Tilmon KT, Snyder WE, Vandersall KS, Datz SG, Welch JD. 1994. Cannibalism reverses male-biased sex ratio in adult mantids: female strategy against food limitation? Oikos 69:193-198. Jayaweera A, Rathnayake DN, Davis KS, Barry KL. 2015. The risk of sexual cannibalism and its effect on male approach and mating behaviour in a praying mantid. Anim Behav 110:113-119. Johns PM, Maxwell MR. 1997. Sexual cannibalism: who benefits? Trend Ecol Evol 12:127-128. Johnson JC. 2001. Sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): an evaluation of two explanations for female aggression towards potential mates. Anim Behav 61:905-914. Kralj-Fišer S, Schneider JM, Kuntner M, Hauber M. 2013. Challenging the aggressive spillover hypothesis: Is pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism a part of a behavioural syndrome? Ethol 119:615-623. Kynaston SE, Mcerlain-Ward P, Mill PJ. 1994. Courtship, mating behavior and sexual cannibalism in praying mantis, Sphodromantis lineola. Anim Behav 47:739-741. Lawrence SE. 1992. Sexual cannibalism in the praying mantid, Mantis religiosa: a field study. Anim Behav 43:569-583. Lelito JP, Brown WD. 2006. Natural history miscellany - Complicity or conflict over sexual cannibalism? Male risk taking in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia sinensis. The Am Nat 168:263-269. Liske E, Davis WJ. 1987. Courtship and mating behaviour of the Chinese praying mantis, Tenodera aridifolia sinensis. Anim Behav 35:1524-1537. Lo N, Beninati T, Stone F, Walker J, Sacchi L. 2007. Cockroaches that lack Blattabacterium endosymbionts: The phylogenetically divergent genus Nocticola. Biol Lett 3:327-330. Maxwell MR. 1998. Lifetime mating opportunities and male mating behaviour in sexually cannibalistic praying mantids. Anim Behav 55:1012-1028. Maxwell MR. 1999. The risk of cannibalism and male mating behavior in the Mediterranean praying mantid, Iris oratoria. Behav 136:205-219. Maxwell MR. 2000. Does a single meal affect female reproductive output in the sexually cannibalistic praying mantid Iris oratoria? Ecol Entomol 25:54-62. Maxwell MR, Gallego KM, Barry KL. 2010. Effects of female feeding regime in a sexually cannibalistic mantid: fecundity, cannibalism, and male response in Stagmomantis limbata (Mantodea). Ecol Entomol 35:775-787. Newman JA, Elgar MA. 1991. Sexual cannibalism in orb-weaving spiders: An economic model. The Am Nat 138:1372-1395. Perez B. 2005. Calling behaviour in the female praying mantis, Hierodula patellifera. Physiol Entomol 30:42-47. Polis GA. 1981. The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:225-251. Prete FR, Wells H, Wells PH, Hurd LE. 1999. The Praying Mantids. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Univervsity Prokop P, Vaclav R. 2005. Males respond to the risk of sperm competition in the sexually cannibalistic praying mantis, Mantis religiosa. Ethol 111:836-848. Prokop P, Vaclav R. 2008. Seasonal aspects of sexual cannibalism in the praying mantis (Mantis religiosa). Jap Ethol Soci 26:213-218. Scardamaglia RC, Fosacheca S, Pompilio L. 2015. Sexual conflict in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantid: males prefer low-risk over high-risk females. Anim Behav 99:9-14. Schneider JM, Elgar MA. 2001. Sexual cannibalism and sperm competition in the golden orb-web spider Nephila plumipes (Araneoidea): female and male perspectives. Behav Ecol 12:547-552. Schneider JM, Elgar MA. 2002. Sexual cannibalism in Nephila plumipes as a consequence of female life strategies. J Evol Biol 15:84-91. Svenson GJ, Whiting MF. 2009. Reconstructing the origins of praying mantises (Dictyoptera, Mantodea): the roles of Gondwanan vicariance and morphological convergence. Cladistics 25:468-514. Thornhill R. 1976. Sexual selection and paternal investment in insects. The Am Nat 110:153-163. Walker LA, Holwell GI. 2016. Sexual cannibalism in a facultative parthenogen: the springbok mantis (Miomantis caffra). Behav Ecol 27:851-856. Watanabe E, Adachi-Hagimori T, Miura K, Maxwell MR, Ando Y, Takematsu Y. 2011. Multiple paternity within field-collected egg cases of the praying mantid Tenodera aridifolia. Ann Entomol Soc Am 104:348-352. Wieland F. 2013. The phylogenetic system of Mantodea (Insecta: Dictyoptera). Species, Phylogeny and Evolution 3:3-222. Wilder SM, Rypstra AL, Elgar MA. 2009. The Importance of Ecological and Phylogenetic Conditions for the Occurrence and Frequency of Sexual Cannibalism. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:21-39. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68890 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 性食意指雌性殺死或取食同種雄性配偶的行為,而「螳螂弒夫」就是廣為人知的性食行為之一。近年來許多研究聚焦於性食發生的機制 (mechanism) 上,想了解雌螳螂在什麼情況下會攻擊雄蟲,而目前有三種被認為可能決定雌蟲攻擊與否的因子,分別是:雌蟲自身的營養狀況 (nutritional status)、雄蟲上背 (mount) 前的雌雄相對位置及雌蟲已交尾與否。本研究以寬腹斧螳 (<i>Hierodula patellfiera</i>) 為材料來檢驗前兩個因子對性食率的影響。多數研究指出性食率會隨著雌螳螂自身的營養狀況而變動,狀況越差的雌蟲越傾向攻擊雄蟲。然而,寬腹斧螳的性食率幾乎不受雌蟲營養狀況的影響,且不論狀況好壞皆具有極高性食率。此外,本研究以「雄蟲被雌蟲偵測的時機」取代雄蟲上背前的相對位置作為評估性食率的因子,並發現在被雌蟲偵測到後才上背的雄蟲有極高的性食率。綜合此二因子觀之,無論雌螳螂營養狀態如何,被偵測到的雄蟲幾乎難逃一死,此無差別的高攻擊性不僅為螳螂目中的首次記錄,也和多數前人的結果不符。長久以來,雌螳螂因營養狀態改變性食率的特性使得性食行為被認為可以提升雌蟲的適存度 (fitness),因而在演化中出現或被保存。但當營養狀況極佳的雌蟲依然有高性食率,寬腹斧螳的性食行為是否是因提昇雌蟲適存度而演化則有待商榷,本種與其他螳螂在性食機制上的差異也代表了性食在螳螂目中多次演化的可能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Mantid is well-known for its sexual cannibalistic behavior, where females kill or consumer the conspecific mates. Recently, several studies were focused on the mechanism of sexual cannibalism, especially what effects the sexual cannibalism ratio. The nutritional status of females, relative orientation before mounting of males, and the mating status of females were considered as the possible factor influencing the occurrence frequency of sexual cannibalism. <i>Hierodula patellifera</i> are used to examine the effect of nutritional status and males mounting on cannibalism ratio in present study. A number of studies argued that cannibalism ratio was varied with the nutritional status of females, and poorly-fed females were more likely to consume their mates. However, the nutritional status has little effect on the cannibalism ratio in <i>H. patellifera</i>. Extremely high cannibalism ratio was observed in different nutritional status. Besides, “Timing detected by females” was used to evaluate the cannibalism ratio instead of relative orientation before mounting. The males detected by females before mounting were more likely to be consumed by females. In summary, females represent highly rapacity toward the detected males no matter they were well-fed or poorly-fed. This phenomenon is inconsistent with previous studies and first recorded in Mantodea. To date, most of the studies suggested that sexual cannibalism could increase the fitness of females, and thus being preserved or emerging in the evolutionary history. However, it is doubtful whether sexual cannibalism could increase the fitness of females or not when the well-fed ones still represent highly rapacity toward their mates. The variation in mechanism also indicate the possibility that sexual cannibalism may evolved several times in Mantodea. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:40:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04632002-1.pdf: 2447836 bytes, checksum: 166cda252d3046c0e1302d695d65c3ea (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Sexual cannibalistic behavior in diverse taxa 1 1.2 Sexual cannibalistic behavior in Mantodea 1 1.2.1 Evolution 1 1.2.2 Current utility 3 1.2.3 Mechanism 5 1.2.3.1 Nutritional status 6 1.2.3.2 Mating status 6 1.2.3.3 Age 7 1.2.3.4 Orientation of mounting 7 1.3 Current hypotheses of sexual cannibalism 8 1.3.1 Hypotheses from spider 8 1.3.1.1 Aggressive spillover hypothesis 8 1.3.1.2 Foraging strategy hypothesis 9 1.3.2 Hypothesis from praying mantids 9 1.3.2.1 Femme fatale hypothesis 10 1.4 Objectives 10 2 Materials & Methods 11 2.1 Insect rearing 11 2.2 Experiment 1: Evaluation of feeding regime 12 2.2.1 Material preparation 12 2.2.2 Feeding regime manipulation 13 2.3 Experiment 2: How nutritional status affects cannibalism 13 2.3.1 Material preparation and manipulation 13 2.3.2 Mating trials 14 2.4 Experiment 3: Effect of nutritional status and male detection 14 2.4.1 Material preparation and manipulation of nutritional status 14 2.4.2 Manipulation of “Timing detected by female” 15 2.4.3 Mating trial 15 2.5 Measuring nutritional status 16 2.6 Statistical analysis 16 3 Results 17 3.1 Experiment 1: Evaluation of feeding regime 17 3.2 Experiment 2: Effect of nutritional status 18 3.2.1 Experiment 2-1 18 3.2.1.1 Behavioral analysis 18 3.2.1.2 Indicators of manipulation 18 3.2.1.3 Other factors 19 3.2.2 Experiment 2-2 20 3.3 Experiment 3: Effect of nutritional status and male detection 20 3.3.1 Behavioral analysis 20 3.3.1.1 31 mating trials 21 3.3.1.2 25 mating trials 21 3.3.2 Indicators of manipulation 22 3.3.2.1 31 mating pairs 22 3.3.2.2 25 mating pairs 24 3.3.2.3 Other factors 25 3.4 Behavior pattern of mating behavior 26 4 Discussion 28 4.1 Evaluation of feeding regime 28 4.2 Effect of nutritional status 29 4.3 Effect of timing 30 4.4 Other factors affecting the analysis of cannibalism ratio 31 4.4.1 Difference in the amount of no contact and escaped males 31 4.4.2 Influence of the age of females 31 4.4.3 Possibility of remating 32 4.4.4 Possible effect of captivity 32 4.4.5 Comparison of different feeding treatments 33 4.5 Hypotheses comparison 34 4.5.1 Aggressive spillover hypothesis 34 4.5.2 Foraging strategy hypothesis 35 4.6 Tinbergen’s question 36 4.6.1 Restricted sampling of phylogenetic comparison 36 4.6.2 Difficulty of investigation on current utility 37 5 Figures 39 6 Tables 47 7 References 54 8 Appendix 57 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 寬腹斧螳雌蟲營養狀態與雄蟲被偵測與否對於性食行為的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effect of female nutrition and detection of the male on the sexual cannibalism in praying mantids, <i> Hierodula patellifera </i> (Mantodea: Mantidae) | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳文哲,楊正澤,周蓮香,Michael R. Maxwell(Michael R. Maxwell) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 營養狀況,被雌蟲偵測之時機,性食率, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | nutritional status,timing detected by female,cannibalism ratio, | en |
dc.relation.page | 60 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703090 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 昆蟲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 昆蟲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.39 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。