請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68830
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱祈榮(Chyi-Rong Chiou) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wan-Wen Cheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄭皖文 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:37:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
Botequilha Leitão、Miller、Ahern、McGarigal。(2006/2011)。景觀量測。(張俊彥、林裕彬、張琪如、吳振發譯)。臺北市:五南。 Forman、Godron。(1986/1994)。景觀生態學(張啟德譯)。臺北市:田園城市。 內政部。內政部20公尺網格數值地形模型資料。取自http://data.gov.tw/node/35430。 內政部營建署。(2011)。壽山國家自然公園計畫書(核定本)。 中華民國永續發展學會。(2012)。壽山國家自然公園解說系統規劃案。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託規劃案。 李俊鴻。(2011)。森林生態系服務功能及其價值探討。林務局一百年度委辦計畫研究報告。 高雄市臺灣地理學會。(2012)。壽山國家自然公園地質資源調查暨地表變形監測規劃計畫。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託研究報告。 高雄市臺灣地理學會。(2013)。102年壽山國家自然公園園區石灰岩洞穴地景資源調查暨西壽山地表變形監測計畫。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託研究報告。 高雄市臺灣地理學會。(2015)。國家自然公園暨周邊地區事業推動與經營策略研擬案。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託規劃案。 張學文。(2014)。壽山國家自然公園山羌族群現況研究成果報告。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託研究報告。 張學文。(2014)。壽山國家自然公園動物資源調查計畫。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託研究報告。 郭美芳。(2012)。壽山國家自然公園人文歷史資源調查暨解說資料彙編計畫。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託研究報告。 曾梓峰。(2012)。壽山國家自然公園步道系統整體規劃與設計準則研擬。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託規劃案。 曾梓峰。(2012)。壽山國家自然公園重要遊憩資源暨活動適宜性評估規劃案。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託規劃案。 綠波國際環境設計有限公司。(2013)。壽山國家自然公園園區遊憩系統規劃暨整體設計準則研擬案。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託規劃案。 裴家騏。(2014)。壽山國家自然公園臺灣獼猴族群資源暨人猴關係計畫。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託研究報告。 劉以誠。(2015)。壽山國家自然公園外來種植物監測計畫。內政部營建署。 劉和義。(2011)。壽山國家自然公園原生植物及外來入侵植物監測及分布調查計畫。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託研究報告。 劉和義。(2015)。104年壽山國家自然公園植群分類及生態空間分布研究計畫。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託研究報告。 劉儒淵。(1989)。戶外遊憩對環境之衝擊及其管理維護。戶外遊憩研究,2(1),3-18。 蘇秀慧。(2014)。壽山國家自然公園台灣獼猴族群數量、分布及行為模式調查與保育模式研擬計畫。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託研究報告。 蘋果綠環境規劃設計股份有限公司。(2014)。壽山國家自然公園遊憩衝突及擁擠管理之調查與評估。壽山國家自然公園籌備處委託研究報告。 鐘靜、張捷。(2011)。基於景觀指數的九寨溝旅遊區旅遊干擾評價。生態學雜誌,30(06),1210-1216。 英文文獻 Asgarian, A., Amiri, B. J., and Sakieh, Y. (2015). Assessing the effect of green cover spatial patterns on urban land surface temperature using landscape metrics approach. Urban Ecosystems, 18(1), 209-222. Assessment, M. E. (2005). Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis, Published by World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. Becken, S., Simmons, D., and Frampton, C. (2003). Segmenting tourists by their travel pattern for insights into achieving energy efficiency. Journal of Travel Research, 42(1), 48-56. Booth, A. G. (1984). Ecology and planning: the planning component. Ecology and Planning. Chapman and Hall, London, pp8-19. Borgogno-Mondino, E., Fabietti, G., and Ajmone-Marsan, F. (2015). Soil quality and landscape metrics as driving factors in a multi-criteria GIS procedure for peri-urban land use planning. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14(4), 743-750. Botequilha Leitão, A., 2001. Sustainable land planning: towards a planning framework method: exploring the role of landscape statistics as an operational planning tool. Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa, Lisbon. Ph.D. Dissertation. Botequilha Leitão, A., and Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and urban planning, 59(2), 65-93. Botequilha Leitão, A., Grueau, C., Ferreira, H., Muge, F., and Ahern, J. (2001, June). Decision support system for planning and management of biodiversity in protected areas. The research project PROBIO. In International workshop on geo-spatial knowledge processing for natural resource management. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Varese (pp. 145-151). Botequilha Leitão, A., Miller, J., Ahern, J., and McGarigal, K. (2012). Measuring landscapes: A planner's handbook. Island press. Brown, J. L. (2014). SDMtoolbox: a python‐based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(7), 694-700. Coiner, C., Wu, J., and Polasky, S. (2001). Economic and environmental implications of alternative landscape designs in the Walnut Creek Watershed of Iowa. Ecological Economics, 38(1), 119-139. Diaz, N. M. (1996). Landscape metrics: A new tool for forest ecologists. Journal of Forestry 94(12): 12-16. Díaz-Varela, E., Alvarez-López, C. J., and Marey-Pérez, M. F. (2009). Multiscale delineation of landscape planning units based on spatial variation of land-use patterns in Galicia, NW Spain. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 5(1), 1-10. Dramstad, W., Olson, J. D., and Forman, R. T. T. (1996). Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning. Island press. Dunn, C. P., Sharpe, D. M., Guntensbergen, G. R., Stearns, F., and Yang, Z. (1991). Methods for analyzing temporal changes in landscape pattern. In M. G. Turner, and R. H. Gardner (Eds.), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: The analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity (pp. 173 – 198). New York: Springer Verlag. Fabos, J. G. (1985). Land-Use planning. From global to local challenge. A Dowden and Culver Book. Environmental Resource Management Series. Chapman & Hall, NewYork. Fernandes, J. P. (2000). Landscape ecology and conservation management—evaluation of alternatives in a highway EIA process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(6), 665-680. Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Island Press. Forman, R. T. T. (2003). Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press. Forman, R. T. T., and Godron, M. (1986). Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York. Geneletti, D., & Pistocchi, A. (2001). Landscape ecology for sustainable land use planning: a GIS approach in a man-dominated landscape. In Proceedings of the international workshop on geo-spatial knowledge processing for natural resource management, Varese (pp. 244-248). Gökyer, E. (2013). Understanding landscape structure using landscape metrics. In Murat Özyavuz(Ed.), Advances in Landscape Architecture. InTech. Gustafson, E. J. (1998). Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art?. Ecosystems, 1(2), 143-156. Hawkins, V., and Selman, P. (2002). Landscape scale planning: exploring alternative land use scenarios. Landscape and urban planning, 60(4), 211-224. Hulse, D., Eilers, J., Freemark, K., Hummon, C., and White, D. (2000). Planning alternative future landscapes in Oregon: evaluating effects on water quality and biodiversity. Landscape Journal, 19(1-2), 1-19. Hunziker, M., and Kienast, F. (1999). Potential impacts of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty–a prototypical technique for automated rapid assessment. Landscape ecology, 14(2), 161-176. Jones, K. B., Neale, A. C., Nash, M. S., Van Remortel, R. D., Wickham, J. D., Riitters, K. H., and O'neill, R. V. (2001). Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: a multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic Region. Landscape Ecology, 16(4), 301-312. Jung, M. (2016). LecoS—A python plugin for automated landscape ecology analysis. Ecological Informatics, 31, 18-21. Kaplan, R., and Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. CUP Archive. Kaplan, S., Kaplan, R., and Wendt, J. S. (1972). Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 12(4), 354-356. Kwenye, J. M., and Freimund, W. (2016). Domestic tourists' loyalty to a local natural tourist setting: Examining predictors from relational and transactional perspectives using a Zambian context. Tourism Management Perspectives, 20, 161-173. Lausch, A., Blaschke, T., Haase, D., Herzog, F., Syrbe, R. U., Tischendorf, L., and Walz, U. (2015). Understanding and quantifying landscape structure–A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics. Ecological Modelling, 295, 31-41. Li, S., and Yang, B. (2015). Introducing a new method for assessing spatially explicit processes of landscape fragmentation. Ecological Indicators, 56, 116-124. Liu, Y., Wei, X., Li, P., and Li, Q. (2016). Sensitivity of correlation structure of class-and landscape-level metrics in three diverse regions. Ecological Indicators, 64, 9-19. Lucas, R. C. (1979). Perceptions of non-motorized recreational impacts: a review of research findings. In Recreational impact on wildlands. Conference proceedings October 27-29, 1978. (pp. 24-31). USDA Forest Service. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city (Vol. 11). MIT press. Macagno, G., and Nunes, P. A. (2011). The influence of landscape diversity on tourist destination choice: A regional perspective. Linking Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Economic Activities: An Indicator-Based Assessment, 85. Marion, J. L., Leung, Y. F., Eagleston, H., and Burroughs, K. (2016). A review and synthesis of recreation ecology research findings on visitor impacts to wilderness and protected natural areas. Journal of Forestry, 114(3), 352-362. Marzuki, A., Masron, T., and Ismail, N. (2016). Land use changes analysis for Pantai Chenang, Langkawi using spatial patch analysis technique in relation to coastal tourism. Tourism Planning and Development, 13(2), 154-167. McEwen, D., and Tocher, S. R. (1976). Zone management: key to controlling recreational impact in developed campsites. Journal of Forestry, 74(2), 90-93. McGarigal, K., and Marks, B. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. McGarigal, K., S.A. Cushman, M.C. Neel, and E. Ene. (2002). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts. Mõisja, K., Uuemaa, E., and Oja, T. (2016). Integrating small-scale landscape elements into land use/cover: The impact on landscape metrics’ values. Ecological Indicators, 67, 714-722. Naveh, Z. (1994). From Biodiversity to Ecodiversity: A Landscape‐Ecology Approach to Conservation and Restoration. Restoration Ecology, 2(3), 180-189. Naveh, Z., and Lieberman, A. S. (2013). Landscape ecology: theory and application. Springer Science and Business Media. (Original work published 1994) Opdam, P., Foppen, R., and Vos, C. (2002). Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape ecology, 16(8), 767-779. Parent, J. R., and Volin, J. C. (2016). Validating Landsat-based landscape metrics with fine-grained land cover data. Ecological Indicators, 60, 668-677. Peck, S. (1998). Planning for biodiversity: issues and examples. Island Press. da Silva, A. M., Huang, C. H., Francesconi, W., Saintil, T., and Villegas, J. (2015). Using landscape metrics to analyze micro-scale soil erosion processes. Ecological Indicators, 56, 184-193. Schindler, S., von Wehrden, H., Poirazidis, K., Wrbka, T., and Kati, V. (2013). Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates. Ecological Indicators, 31, 41-48. Schumaker, N. H. (1996). Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology, 77(4), 1210-1225. Sukhdev, P. W., Schröter-Schlaack, H., Nesshöver, C., Bishop, C., and Brink, J. (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB (No. 333.95 E19). UNEP, Ginebra (Suiza). Szaro, R. C., Sexton, W. T., and Malone, C. R. (1998). The emergence of ecosystem management as a tool for meeting people's needs and sustaining ecosystems. Landscape and urban planning, 40(1), 1-7. Turner, M. G. (1989). Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 20(1), 171-197. Vaz, E., De Noronha, T., and Nijkamp, P. (2014). Exploratory landscape metrics for agricultural sustainability. Agroecology and sustainable food systems, 38(1), 92-108. Wall , G. and Wright, C. (1977). The environmental impact of outdoor recreation. Publication Series, No. 11. Waterloo: Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68830 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 景觀生態學整合了生態學領域與地理學領域,討論人類社會與自然環境的互動關係,從土地利用的概念加以定義與分類景觀單元,並在不同的尺度上探討景觀格局和生態學的關聯。其核心理念包括景觀格局的結構,其所具備的功能,以及隨著時間的變遷所發生的影響。景觀量測基於景觀生態學理論而提出,以量化格局的方式,針對嵌塊體的面積與邊緣特性、幾何形狀特性、核心區域與邊緣區域、以及嵌塊體間的對比性、相同嵌塊體在格局中的聚集程度、整體景觀的嵌塊體多樣性發展出一套景觀指數系統,有效地量測結構、闡明功能,也是預測與評估景觀變遷的重要方法學。本研究依過去-現在-未來的時序,建立了壽山的四個遊憩情境,從過去未有遊憩活動介入的完全軍事管制狀態(情境一),到現階段的遊憩發展狀態(情境二),以及未來遊客規模增加而無積極採取遊憩管理的狀態(情境三)、未來遊客規模增加而施行步道管制與管理措施的狀態(情境四)。本研究利用FRAGSTATS進行景觀指數的計算,透過景觀指數分別對於四個情境的格局進行景觀結構的量測、景觀功能的說明,並模擬遊憩管理策略的施行,檢視其對於景觀格局負面功能的減緩作用。接著,以山羌為例,進行壽山山羌分布調查資料與景觀指數項目的Spearman相關分析,藉由觀看景觀格局在現階段情境(情境二)與山羌分布偏好的關聯,評估未來情境的格局變化對山羌分布的可能影響,並推估遊憩管理策略對於緩和負面影響的成效。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Landscape ecology discusses the relationship between human society and natural environment, integrating ecological and geographical perspectives. Its core concept lies in the linkage of three main characteristics: structure, function and change. Based on the theories of landscape ecology, landscape metrics quantifies landscape pattern from six properties: patch area and edge, patch shape, patch core area, contrast between patches, aggregation of similar patches and patches diversity. Landscape metrics efficiently measure landscape composition and configuration and illustrate landscape function, it is also helpful for landscape changes prognosis and diagnosis. This study develops four recreational scenarios in a “past-present-future” time series, based on subjects of original military control stage without recreational activities (Scenario1), present stage (Scenario2), impact zones of Recreational areas and Wild paths extension (Scenario3) and Recreational areas broaden with Wild paths enclosed. Landscape metrics are used to measure structure and interpret function, and recreation management strategy is also been examined the effects for mitigating the negative function through the analysis. After that, this study takes the Formosan Reeves' muntjac as a focal species, and a Spearman correlation analysis between species distribution data and selected landscape metrics is been done to evaluate the recreational impacts at the present stage, and is been used to prognosis the possible impacts from the landscape changes from the present stage to the future stage (Scenario3 and 4). Finally, the recreation management strategy is also been evaluated for the effects of negative impacts mitigation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:37:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04625001-1.pdf: 7168710 bytes, checksum: 73490da7516cc65b96b5abe96783add1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
摘要 I Abstract II 目錄 III 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 壹、 緒論 1 一、 研究動機與背景 1 二、 研究目的 2 貳、 文獻回顧 3 一、 景觀生態學基礎理論 3 (一) 基本元素與原理 3 (二) 基本原則 7 二、 景觀量測 13 (一) 景觀指數 13 (二) 整合生態與規劃的方法學 15 (三) 景觀指數分析工具與相關軟體 19 參、 材料與方法 20 一、 研究區域 20 (一) 範圍界定 20 (二) 環境與資源 21 (三) 遊憩活動 23 二、 研究材料 24 (一) 生物資源 24 (二) 非生物資源 24 (三) 文化資源 24 三、 研究方法 25 (一) 現地環境勘查 27 (二) 景觀單元分類 35 (三) 建立壽山區域景觀單元分類圖 36 (四) 選定景觀指數 37 (五) 景觀指數計算 42 (六) 景觀格局描述 43 (七) 現階段遊憩情境之景觀格局與山羌分布偏好之關聯探討 43 (八) 情境模擬與評估 45 肆、 結果與討論 52 一、 壽山區域現階段的景觀格局分析 52 二、 壽山區域不同遊憩情境的景觀格局變化評估 54 (一) 情境二:全區 54 (二) 情境二:北壽山軍事區與步道遊憩區 58 (三) 情境三:全區 61 (四) 情境三:北壽山軍事區與步道遊憩區 65 (五) 情境四:全區 67 (六) 情境四:北壽山軍事區與步道遊憩區 71 (七) 現階段壽山景觀格局對山羌分布偏好之關聯探討 73 (八) 未來遊憩模擬情境的壽山景觀格局對山羌分布的影響評估 77 伍、 結論與建議 78 一、 結論 78 二、 建議 81 三、 研究限制 82 參考文獻 83 中文文獻 83 英文文獻 84 附錄 91 附錄一 91 附錄二 99 附錄三 118 附錄四 119 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 應用景觀格局探討壽山不同遊憩情境之評估 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Applying Landscape Patterns to Access Shoushan Recreational Scenarios | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 余家斌,薛怡珍 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 景觀生態學,景觀格局,景觀指數,遊憩情境,FRAGSTATS, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | landscape ecology,landscape pattern,landscape metrics,recreational scenario,FRAGSTATS, | en |
dc.relation.page | 120 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703419 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 7 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。