請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68788
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃尹男(Yin-Nan Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ming-Kang Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張明康 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:35:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-07 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-09-07 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | ACI 318-14 (2014). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.
ACI 349M (2006). Code requirements for nuclear safety-related concrete structures and commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan. AISC 341-16 (2016). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois. AISC N690s1-15 (2015). “Specification for Safety-Related Steel Structures for Nuclear Facilities.” AISC N690s1-15, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois. Booth, P., Varma, A. H., and Seo, J. (2015). “Lateral load capacity of steel plate composite wall structures.” Transactions, SMiRT-23, Manchester, United Kingdom. Fujita, T., Funakoshi A., Akita S., and Matsuo I. (1998). “Experimental Study on a Concrete Filled Steel Structure Part 14 thru 17 Bending Shear Tests.” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan, 1121-1128. Fukumoto, T., Kato, B., Sato, K., Toyama, K., and Kobayashi, M. (1987). “Concrete filled steel bearing walls.” IABSE 5. Funakoshi, A., Akita, S., Matsumoto, H., Hara, K., Matsuo, I., and Hayashi, N. (1998). “Experimental study on a concrete filled steel structure Part. 7 Bending Shear Tests (Outline of the experimental program and the results).” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan, 1063-1064. Kurt, E. G., Varma, A. H., Epackachi, S., and Whittaker, A. S. (2015). “Rectangular SC Wall Piers: Summary of Seismic Behavior and Design.” Proc., Structures Congress, ASCE, 1042-1051. Lai, Z., Varma, A. H., and Zhang, K. (2014). “Noncompact and slender rectangular CFT members: Experimental database, analysis, and design.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 101, 455-468. Miyasaka, E., Ishimura, K., Fujita, T., Miyamoto, Y., and Suzuki, A. (2007). “Dynamic characteristics of a SC building in Kashiwazaki NPP site using vibration test - Part 2: Simulation analysis.” Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 19), Paper #K09/4, 19th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Toronto. Murray, Y. D. (2007). “USERS MANUAL FOR LS-DYNA CONCRETE MATERIAL MODEL 159.” FHWA-HRT-05-062, APTEK, Inc., Colorado Springs, Colorado. Niousha, A., Naito, Y., Miyasaka, E., and Uchiyama, S. (2007). “Dynamic characteristics of a SC building in Kashiwazaki NPP site using Vibration Test - Part 1: Data analysis and system identification.” Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 19), Paper #K09/2, 19th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Toronto. Ozaki, M., Akita, S., Osuga, H., Nakayama, T., and Adachi, N. (2004). “Study on steel plate reinforced concrete panels subjected to cyclic in-plane shear.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, 228(1-3), 225-244. Seo, J., Varma, A. H., Sener, K., and Ayhan, D. (2016). “Steel-plate composite (SC) walls: In-plane shear behavior, database, and design.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 119, 202–215. Takeuchi, M., Narikawa, M., Matsuo, I., Hara, K., and Usami, S. (1998). “Study on a concrete filled structure for nuclear power plants.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, 179(2), 209-223. Varma, A. H., Malushte, S. R., Sener, K. C., and Lai, Z. (2014). “Steel-plate composite (SC) walls for safety related nuclear facilities: Design for in-plane forces and out-of-plane moments.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, 269, 240-249. Varma, A. H., Zhang, K., Chi, H., Booth, P. and Baker, T. (2011). “In-plane Shear Behavior of SC composite Walls: Theory vs. Experiment.” Transactions, SMiRT-21, New Delhi, India. 林柏劭 (2017)。有邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆之耐震行為與試驗研究。國立臺灣大學工學院土木工程學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 鄭與錚 (2016)。有邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆之耐震行為與試驗研究。國立臺灣大學工學院土木工程學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68788 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目前美國所使用之設計規範AISC N690s1-15(2015)提供鋼板混凝土複合牆平面內剪力強度之預測方法,Booth et al. (2015)以設計規範AISC N690s1-15(2015)之預測方法為基礎提出另一平面內剪力強度之預測方法,改善設計規範AISC N690s1-15(2015)對於鋼板混凝土複合牆在有邊界構材時低估之情形。然而,不論是設計規範AISC N690s1-15(2015)或是Booth et al. (2015)對於有邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆改善之預測方法,兩者皆僅使用水平向斷面尺寸與材料參數,並未考慮牆體高寬比之影響,如以上述預測方法進行評估,在相同水平向斷面尺寸但高度不同之情況下,剪力強度的預測值皆會相等,此現象並不符合試驗之觀察結果。本研究以此為出發點,考慮高寬比之影響,對於評估有邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆之剪力強度,提出一較具物理意義之預測方法。
為對鋼板混凝土複合牆之行為能有更多瞭解,本研究依據有限元素分析軟體LS-DYNA之分析結果,假設有邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆之剪力強度可由鋼面板與混凝土壓桿所貢獻之剪力強度直接相加而得,以此推導出一預測模型。再藉由斷面分析軟體XTRACT,以較方便求得之壓力區深度取代壓桿深度代入預測模型。最後,觀察XTRACT之分析結果,對預測模型作進一步簡化。 將本研究所建議簡化後之預測模型和現有之預測方法進行比較,發現其準確性較現有之預測方法高,以此推論,對於評估有邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆之剪力強度,本研究所建議簡化後之預測模型為一種較具準確性、方便性與物理意義之預測方法。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Currently, AISC N690s1-15 (2015) provides the method for predicting the in-plane shear strength of steel-plate composite wall (SC wall). On the other hand, Booth et al. (2015) also provides another prediction method based on AISC N690s1-15 (2015) to improve the underestimate for predicting the in-plane shear strength of SC wall with boundary elements. Nevertheless, whether AISC N690s1-15 (2015) or Booth et al. (2015), they both simply take the dimension of horizontal cross section and the parameters of materials into consideration, neglecting the effect of aspect ratio. It means that SC walls with the same dimension of horizontal cross section but different height have the same in-plane shear strength. The prediction is different from the experimental result. This research uses above result as a starting point, taking the effect of aspect ratio, providing a method with physical meaning for predicting the in-plane shear strength of SC wall with boundary elements.
To make a further understanding of the behavior of SC wall, this research uses the finite element method software LS-DYNA as the analytical tool, developing a prediction model. The shear strength of SC wall can be calculated directly by the contribution of faceplate and concrete strut respectively. Furthermore, prediction model uses the depth of compression zone which is more convenient to get by cross-sectional analytical software XTRACT to replace the depth of concrete strut. Finally, this research simplifies the prediction model by observing the analytical result by XTRACT. Comparing the simplified method suggested by this research with other prediction methods, simplified method is more accurate than other prediction methods. For evaluating the in-plane shear strength of SC wall with boundary elements, simplified method is a more accurate, convenient, and physically prediction method. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:35:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04521218-1.pdf: 12185995 bytes, checksum: 3c1a1a66b2a1d0ec2080e1b638a7f865 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 vi 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 xi 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 背景 1 1.2 目的 2 1.3 論文結構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 鋼板混凝土複合牆平面內剪力強度之預測方法 5 2.1.1 無邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆之平面內剪力強度 5 2.1.2 有邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆之平面內剪力強度 6 2.2 鋼板混凝土複合牆平面內撓曲強度之預測方法 8 2.2.1 無邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆之平面內撓曲強度 8 2.2.2 有邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆之平面內撓曲強度 10 2.3 剪力破壞控制鋼板混凝土複合牆之相關文獻 11 第三章 有限元素模擬與驗證 19 3.1 試體介紹與試驗結果 19 3.1.1 試體介紹 19 3.1.2 試驗結果 19 3.2 有限元素分析軟體之模型設定 20 3.2.1 軟體之介紹 20 3.2.2 模型之建立 20 3.2.3 材料性質之設定 21 3.2.4 接觸條件之設定 22 3.2.5 邊界條件之設定 23 3.3 有限元素分析軟體之分析結果與試驗結果之比較 23 3.3.1 最大側推強度之比較 23 3.3.2 遲滯迴圈與側推曲線之比較 24 3.3.3 混凝土破壞情形之比較 24 3.3.4 鋼面板與邊界鋼板最大應變分佈之比較 25 3.3.5 林柏劭 (2017)SCB5延伸牆破壞之探討 25 第四章 剪力強度預測模型 49 4.1 預測模型之建立、假設與驗證 49 4.1.1 預測模型之建立 49 4.1.2 假設與驗證─鋼面板 49 4.1.3 假設與驗證─混凝土 50 4.1.4 假設與驗證─邊界構材 51 4.2 鋼面板貢獻之剪力強度預測 52 4.3 混凝土貢獻之剪力強度預測─有限元素分析法 53 4.3.1 壓桿辨別之方法 53 4.3.2 壓桿角度之修正 54 4.3.3 壓桿受壓面位置與深度之決定 54 4.3.4 壓桿以有限元素分析軟體分析之結果 54 4.4 混凝土貢獻之剪力強度預測─斷面分析法 55 4.4.1 以LS-DYNA比較牆底壓力區深度與壓桿深度 56 4.4.2 以XTRACT作斷面分析所得之壓力區深度取代壓桿深度 56 4.5 混凝土貢獻之剪力強度預測─簡化分析法 58 第五章 剪力強度模型之驗證 94 5.1 文獻之預測方法 94 5.1.1 剪力強度預測方法(Booth et al. 2015) 94 5.1.2 剪力強度預測方法(鄭與錚 2016) 95 5.2 剪力強度預測結果之比較 96 5.2.1 以鄭與錚 (2016)與林柏劭 (2017)之試驗結果比較 96 5.2.2 以文獻之試驗結果比較 96 5.2.3 篩選文獻中不適用之試體後再進行比較 97 5.3 剪力強度模型之適用範圍 99 5.4 剪力強度模型之延伸探討 100 第六章 結論與建議 112 6.1 結論 112 6.2 建議 113 參考文獻 115 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 有邊界構材之鋼板混凝土複合牆之剪力行為分析研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Analytical Study of In-Plane Shear Behavior of Steel-Plate Composite Wall with Boundary Elements | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡克銓(Keh-Chyuan Tsai),黃世建(Shyh-Jiann Hwang),李宏仁(Hung-Jen Lee) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 鋼板混凝土複合牆,邊界構材,剪力強度,有限元素分析,LS-DYNA, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | steel-plate composite wall,boundary element,shear strength,finite element method analysis,LS-DYNA, | en |
dc.relation.page | 117 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703525 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 11.9 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。