請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68608
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周家蓓 | |
dc.contributor.author | Dong-Xu Jiang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 江東旭 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:27:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] 道路交通標誌標線號誌設置規則,民國104 年05 月14 日修正。
[2] 交通部,交通工程規範,民國104 年1 月9 日頒布。 [3] 公路總局,施工說明書(技術規定),民國104 年8 月14 日修訂。 [4] 道路標線使用性能,國家標準CNS 15834,民國104 年9 月23 日公告。 [5] Kuttesch, J. S., Quantifying the Relationship between Skid Resistance and Wet Weather Accidents for Virginia Data, Master of Science Thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Virginia State University, 2004. [6] 邱垂德,李國禎,簡圳銘,以國際摩擦指標評估鋪面抗滑性之初步研究,技師期刊,第42期,民國95 年9 月,p. 101-106 [7] Hall, J.W., et al., Guide for pavement friction. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. 2009: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. [8] Andresen, A. and J.C. Wambold, Friction fundamentals, concepts and methodology. 1999. [9] Pulugurtha, Srinivas S., Prasanna R. Kusam, and Kuvleshay J. Patel. 'Assessment of the effect of pavement macrotexture on interstate crashes.' Journal of transportation engineering 138.5 (2011): 610-617. [10] Li, S., S. Noureldin, and K. Zhu, Safety Enhancement of the INDOT Network Pavement Friction Testing Program: Macrotexture and Microtexture Testing Using Laser Sensors. 2010, Joint Transportation Research Program: West Lafayette, Indiana. [11] 周家蓓主持,陳艾懃協同主持,鋪面自動化辨識與自行車道平坦度量測設備功能擴展,內政部營建署委託研究,103年7月。 [12] 丘宜謙,市區道路標線抗滑性能之研究,台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文,民國95年10 月。 [13] ASTM E274-06 Standard Test Method for Skid Resistance of Paved Surfaces Using a Full-Scale Tire [14] ASTM E1337 Standard Test Method for Determining Longitudinal Peak Braking Coefficient of Paved Surfaces Using Standard Reference Test Tire [15] ASTM E670 Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Bath Tubs [16] ASTM E303 Standard Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester [17] ASTM E1911 Standard Test Methods for Determination of Carbon, Sulfur, Nitrogen, and Oxygen in Steel, Iron, Nickel, and Cobalt Alloys by Various Combustion and Fusion Techniques [18] 李世大,跑道抗滑係數檢測及分析之研究-以臺灣桃園國際機場為例,國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文,民國96年。 [19] Liu Y, Fwa T F, Choo Y S. Effect of surface macrotexture on skid resistance measurements by the British Pendulum Test[J]. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2004, 32(4): 304-309. [20] Gonzalez M, Tighe S L, Medley J B, et al. Assessing Friction Response of Nanoconcrete for Rigid Pavements Using British Pendulum Tester and Tribometer[C]//Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting. 2015 (15-1669). [21] http://www.controls-group.com/eng/ [22] 陳准松,「瀝青混凝土路面工程—設計、施工與品質管制」,1977.2。 [23] 社團法人日本道路協會,鋪裝試驗法便覽,社團法人日本道路協會出版,東京(昭和六十三年十一月) [24] Steven B. Friction Testing of Pavement Preservation Treatments: Temperature Corrections and Operator/Machine Variability[R]. 2009. [25] 東日本高速道路株式會社、中日本高速道路株式會社、西日本高速道路株式會社,レーンマーク施工管理要領,2015 年。 [26] 2009 G B T. 道路交通标线质量要求和检测方法 [S][D]. [27] Highway Department, Guidance Notes on Road Markings, RD/GN/036A, Hong Kong. Jan. 2016 [28] BS EN 1436:2007+A1:2008 Road marking materials. Road marking performance for road users [29] The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, General Specification for Civil Engineering Works, 2006 Edition. with amendments. 2015. [30] NZ Transport Agency, Specification for High Performance Roadmarking, 2009. [31] Pavement Marking Manual, Ver. 4.0, Government of South Australia, Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, Version 4.0 : March 2015 [32] Specification 604 Pavement Marking, MAIN ROADS Western Australia, 2008. [33] Technical Specification, MRTS45 Road Surface Delineation, Transport and Main Roads Specifications, State of Queensland, Department of Transport and Main Roads, August 2012 [34] Roads in Hertfordshire: Highway Design Guide 3rd Edition, January 2011. [35] Planning-Highways Guide Part 4 [36] ASTM D713-90(2010), Standard Practice for Conducting Road Service Tests on Fluid Traffic Marking Materials, ASTM International. 本規範最新版為2012年改版,但2012年版本中已刪除成本計算相關內容。 [37] Montebello, David, and Jacqueline Schroeder. Cost of pavement marking materials. No. MN/RC-2000-11, Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2000. [38] De Witt, A. J., R. A. F. Smith, and Alex T. Visser. Durability and cost effectiveness of road marking paint. SATC 2000 (2000). [39] Gillespie, James S. Enhanced Night Visibility Series, Volume XI: Phase II―Cost-Benefit Analysis. No.FHWA-HRT-04-142. 2005. [40] Kansaa Department of Transportation, Pavement Marking Policy, January 2002. [41] Asdrubali, Francesco, et al. 'Assessment of the performance of road markings in urban areas: the outcomes of the CIVITAS Renaissance Project.' Open Transportation Journal 7 (2013): 7-19. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68608 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 道路標線是確保用路人行之安全的交通設施之一,具有指向、警示、禁止與遵行等功能,對用路人而言具相當重要性。一般道路常用的熱處理聚酯標線在表面潮濕有水時,其抗滑值較低,可能導致行駛在上面的倆輪機動車輛產生打滑現象。CNS4342 標準提出添加玻璃珠來增加反光性的做法已經有明確規定,且近年來甫頒布之CNS15834 對此也有反光及抗滑等級之劃分。然反光玻璃珠的預摻或外撒對於抗滑能力有何影響,且是否可以經由內摻或外撒其他抗滑材料來提高標線的抗滑能力為本研究之目的。
本研究為探討有效提高熱處理聚酯標線抗滑性能且能兼顧反光性能的摻料組合及配比,首先於台灣大學水源校區試驗場分三梯次劃設77種不同摻料及配比的標線樣本,利用英式擺錘分別追蹤檢測2個月的性能標線。然後由初步結論,選擇高反射玻璃珠與小石英砂作為摻料組合并設計不同配比,於都會區、平原區、丘陵區、及山嶺區四處現地進行標線樣本劃設,進行為期8個月的追蹤檢測。根據各標線樣本性能標線,并利用自行建立之標線績效因子計算式對各種摻料組合進行性能成本比較,初步得到具有較好抗滑性且能兼顧反光性的標線摻料組合。 本研究初步建議選擇於聚酯材料中加入10%重量比之高反射珠,30%重量比之CNS I 型一般珠作為同時提升抗滑及反光性能之熱處理聚酯標線材料,同時配合高反射珠與小石英砂1:1 混合之外撒料以每平方米300 克均勻撒布於標線表面。依據現地試驗追蹤8 個月之性能表現,此建議材料組合應可於劃設初始提供BPN 55 之抗滑值,並至使用8 個月後仍維持BPN 50 左右。本研究建議宜適當提高台灣標線抗滑驗收值,并依據不同地理區域之機車行駛特性訂定不同標線抗滑驗收值,且定期追蹤其使用績效,以確保其抗滑之基本性能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Pavement marking is one of the traffic facilities to ensure the safety of road users. It has four major functions: directing, warning, prohibiting and guiding. When the surface of thermoplastic pavement marking becomes wet, its skid resistance value will be low. This may cause the two wheeled vehicle, such as motorbike, increases its risk of sliding on the pavement marking. The CNS 4342 standard proposes that adding glass beads to increase the retroreflectivity has been clearly defined, and in recent years the CNS 15834 has also classified the retroreflectivity and skid resistance. The purpose of this study is to investigate how pre-mixing and drop-on of reflective glass beads influence the pavement marking skid resistance, and whether the skid resistance of the pavement marking can be improved by adding or spreading other anti-skid materials.
This study discusses material combinations that can improve the skid resistance of thermoplastic marking while guaranteeing retroreflective properties. First, test site of77 thermoplastic marking samples with different kinds of admixture and amount was conducted at the National Taiwan University campus. Survey of skid resistance by using British Pendulum Tester was followed for two months. The preliminary conclusion indicates that the drop-on materials of 50%-50% combination of high reflective index glass beads and quartz sand can provide the best results of both retroreflectivity and skid resistance. Several pavement marking samples of different proportions were placed in four geographic regions, i.e. metropolitan, plain, hill, and mountain. Both retroreflectivity and skid resistance were tested continuously for 8 months. According to the samples’ performance, the cost-benefit analysis algorithm was developed. This study suggested adding 10% weight ratio of high retroreflectivity glass beads, and 30% weight ratio of CNS type I glass beads as the pre-mix additives. It also suggests the proper drop-on high reflective glass beads and small quartz sand should be 50%-50% weight ratio of 300 grams per square meter. According to the long-term field performance for 8 months, the suggested combination can provide BPN 55 as initial resistance value and remain about BPN 50 after 8 months. This study suggests that the pavement marking skid resistance initial value and maintenance threshold should be increased in Taiwan. According to different geographical regions, the skid resistance thresholds should be different from region to region, and regular inspection is also recommended for maintaining its required performance. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:27:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04521530-1.pdf: 1971098 bytes, checksum: c024f3d4a0e2efce797ada4650c9c061 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 xi 表目錄 xiv 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究方法與流程 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 標線抗滑能力之意義 5 2.2 標線抗滑能力檢測方式 6 2.2.1 英式擺錘 9 2.2.2 動態摩擦測試儀 10 2.4 BPT檢測值溫度修正 12 2.5 標線抗滑值規範 14 2.6 標線成本分析 17 第三章 抗滑能力檢測設備 23 3.1 英式擺錘(British Pendulum Tester)或攜帶式抗滑儀(Portable Skid Resistance Tester) 23 3.1.1 儀器說明 23 3.1.2 BPN與SRT之比較說明 26 3.1.3 抗滑值溫度修正 33 3.2 動態摩擦測試儀(Dynamic Friction Tester,DFT) 42 3.2.1 儀器原理 42 3.2.2 檢測方法 44 3.2.3 儀器特點 45 3.3 搖篩機 45 第四章 台大水源校區試驗場 48 4.1 2016年6月8日台灣大學水源校區試驗場第一次劃設 49 4.1.1 劃設情況 49 4.1.2 結果分析 54 4.1.3 小結 60 4.2 2016年7月19日台灣大學水源校區試驗場第二次劃設 61 4.3 2016年8月12日台灣大學水源校區試驗場第三次劃設 65 4.4 反光及抗滑性能影響因素探討 69 4.4.1 玻璃珠類型對抗滑值之影響 70 4.4.2 抗滑材料類型 72 4.4.3 玻璃珠及抗滑材料外撒量 74 4.4.4 結構性標線對抗滑性能之影響 78 4.5 總結 78 第五章 現地試驗 80 5.1 劃設地點與標線類型選擇 80 5.2 劃設摻料與配比設計 82 5.3 各路段現地劃設情況 87 5.3.1 丘陵區:台4線33K+100~33K+300(順樁)現地劃設狀況 87 5.3.2 山嶺區:台7線18K+600~18K+800(雙向)現地劃設狀況 89 5.3.3 都會區:台1線271K+900~271K+750(逆樁)現地劃設狀況 90 5.3.4 平原區:台66線0K+000~0K+110(順樁)現地劃設狀況 92 5.4 現地試驗結果分析 95 5.4.1 現地試驗追蹤檢測數據分析 95 5.4.2 外撒量及內摻料之影響 109 5.4.3 成本分析 114 5.4.4 標線抗滑驗收值 132 第六章 結論與建議 137 6.1 結論 137 6.2 建議 138 參考文獻 140 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 熱處理聚酯標線添加料對抗滑性能影響性研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Skid Resistance Analysis of Thermoplastic Pavement Marking | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳建旭,蘇育民,陳世晃 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 熱處理聚酯標線,反光玻璃珠,抗滑添加料,英式擺錘數BPN,抗滑驗收值, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | thermoplastic pavement marking,reflective glass beads,skid resistance additive,British Pendulum Number (BPN),skid resistance acceptance value, | en |
dc.relation.page | 143 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703967 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.92 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。