請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67910完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇彩足(Tsai-Tsu Su) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ao-Sai-Na Chin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 金奧賽娜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:57:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-01-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-07-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-07-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
壹、中文部分 何其松、程群,2000,<二戰中的美國經濟動員特點>,《軍事經濟研究》,2000/11。 郝國勝,2005,《人口老齡化、養老金均衡與參量改革——OECD的經驗與啟示》,《貴州社會科學》,10:109-117。 陳恆鈞、蔣麗君、韓家瑩、侯淑嫣、周邵彥譯,2004,《最新政策分析:概念與實踐》,台北:韋文化國際出版有限公司。譯自David L.Weimer and Aian R.Vining.Policy Analysis :Concepts and Practice,3rd ed. 陳光金譯,2000,《計算共識》,北京:中國社會科學出版社。譯自James M.Buchanan and Gordon Tullock. The Calculus of Consent:Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. 許溪南、王家美,2009,《2008全球金融海嘯之起因、影響與教訓》,證券櫃檯,第144期:87-98。 黃安年,2013,《當代美國的社會保障政策》,北京:中國社會科學出版社。 楊春學等譯,1999,《公共選擇理論》,北京:中國社會科學出版社。譯自Dennis C.Mueller.Public Choice, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press 1989. 鄭秉文譯,2006,《21世紀的老年收入保障:養老金制度改革國際比較》,北京:中國勞動社會保障出版社。原著作者:Robert Holzmann, Richard P. Hinz, Hermann von Gersdorff. 劉合波、王黎,2012,<生存資源與國際危機:第一次石油危機探析>,《國際論壇》,14(4)。 劉滌源,1980,<美國戰後第六次經濟危機同三十年代大經濟危機的對比分析>,《世界經濟》 ,第1期:14-21。 貳、西文部分 Achenbaum, Andrew. 1988. Social Security: Visions and Revisions: A Twentieth Century Fund Study. U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 86. Advisory Council on social security. 1971. “Reports on the Old-Age,Survivors,and Disability Insurance and Medicare Programs”. Washington, D.C.: Social Security Administration. Altmeyer, Arthur J. 1966. The Formative Years of Social Security. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 122-123. Ball, Robert. 1966. “Policy Issues in Social Security”. Social Security Bulletin. June. Ball, Robert. 1973. “Social Security Amendments of 1972: Summary and Legislative History”. Social Security Bulletin. March. Beland, Daniel. 2005. Social Security: History and Politics from the New Deal to the Privatization Debate. University Press of Kansas, 116-129. Beland, Daniel. 2007. “Ideas and Institutional Change in Social Security: Conversion,Layering,and Policy Drift”. Social Science Quarterly,Volume 88, N umber 1, March 2007. Berkowitz, Edward. 1991. America's Welfare State: From Roosevelt to Reagan. Johns Hopkins University Press , 64. Berkowitz, Edward. 1995. Mr.Social Security: The Life of Wilbur J. Cohen. Lawrence:University press of Kansas, 245-250. Berkowitz, Edward. 2003. Rebert Ball And the Politics of Social Security. Wisconsin Press University Press. Brain, Charles. 1991. Social Security at the Crossroads: Public Opinion and Public Policy. New York: Garland Publishing, 81. Cate, Jerry. 1983. Insuring Inequality: Administrative Leadership in Social Security, 1935-1954. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Christgau, Victor. 1960. “Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance After Twenty-Five Years”. Social Security Bulletin, 23(8): 20-30. Clements, Gupta. 2011. “The Challenge of Public Pension Reform in Advanced and Emerging Economy”. Prepared by the Fiscal Affairs Department, Approved by Carlo Cottarelli. 2011.12.28. Cohen, Beedon. 1994. “Options for balancing the OASDI Trust Funds for the long term”. Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 6(1-2):77-93. February 1994. Cohen, Wilbur & Meyers, Robert, 1950. “Social Security Act Amendments of 1950:A Summary and Legislative History”. Social Security Bulletin 13(October 1950). Denzau, Arthur. and Munger, Michael. 1986. “Legislators and interest groups: How unorganized interests get represented”. American Political Science Review 80(1): 89-106. Derthick, Martha. 1979. Policymaking for Social Security. Washiington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. DeWitt, Larry, “Research Note no.14: Key Data from Anuual Trust Fund Reports”. Washington, DC, Social Security Administration, June 2001. http://www.ssa.gov/history/trustchart.html, accessed March 5, 2005. Kirschten, Dick. 1983. “President Reagan After Two Years: Bold Actions but Uncertain Results”. National Journal, vol. 16, no. 1 (January 1. 1983). Disney, Richard. 1999. “OECD Public Pension Programs in Crisis: An Evaluation of the Reform Options”. Social Protection Discussion Paper series; no. SP 9921. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. EBRI. 2014. “EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 3: Sources of Income for Persons Aged 55 and Over”. https://www.ebri.org/pdf/publications/ books/databook/DB.Chapter%2003.pdf. Updated July 2014. Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home style: Representatives in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown. Gruber, Jonathan. 2011. “The Tax Exclusion for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance”. National Tax Journal, vol 64(2, Part 2),pages 511-530. Hacker, Jacobs. 2004. “Privatizing Risk Without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States”. American Political Science Review, 98(2): 243-60. Harris, Louis., and Associates, Inc. 1981. Aging in the eighties: America in transition. Washiongton, D.C.: National Council on the Aging, Inc. Howden, Lindsay & Meyer, Julie. 2011. “2010 Census Briefs: Age and Sex Composition: 2010”. U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistic Administration. U.S. Census Bureau. Joseph. Pechman, Henry. Aaron, and Michael.Taussig. 1968. Social Security: Perspectives for Reform. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Kalt, Joseph. and Zupan, Mark. 1988. “The apparent ideological behavior of legislators: Testing for principal agent slack in political institutions”. Unpublished manuscript. University of Southern California School of Business. Kingdon, John. 1973. Congressmen’s voting decisions. New York: Harper & Row. Levin, Martin, Landy, Marc and Shapiro, Martin, 2001. In Seeking the Center: Politics and Policymaking at the New Century, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 193-214. Lott, John. and Reed, Robert. 1989. “Shirking and sorting in a political market with finite-lived politicians”. Public Choice 61: 75-96. Martin, Patricia and Weaver, David. 2005. “Social Security: A Program and Policy History” Social Security Bulletin. Vol.66.No.1.2005. Matthews, Donald. and Stimson, James. 1970. “Decision-making by U.S. Representatives”. In S.S. Ulmer(Ed.), Political decision-making. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Mayer, Robert. 1985. Policy and Program Planning: A Developmental Perspective. Publisher: Prentice Hall College Div. Meltsner, Arnold. 1972. “Political Feasibility and Policy Analysis”. Public Administration Review. Vol.32.No.6.Nov.-Dec.1972.pp.859-867. OECD, 2016. “OECD pension at a glance 2015: OECD and G20 Indicators”. www.oecd.org/about/publishing/Corrigendum-Pensions-at-a-Glance2015. pdf. Revised version, March 2016. Pechman, Joseph. 1983. Economics for Policymaking: Selected Essays of Arthur M.Okun. Cambridge: MIT Press, p.viii. Peter D. Hart Research Associates, A Nationwide Survey of Attitudes Toward Social Seurity, 1979. Pew Research Center. “Campaign Exposes Fissures Over Issues, Values and How Life Has Changed in the U.S.”. http://www.people-press.org/2016/03/31/3-viewson-economy-government-services-trade/. March 31, 2016. RichardsonJr, Lilliard and Munger, Michael. 1989. “Shirking, representation, and Congressional behavior: Voting on the 1983 amendments to the Social Security Act”. Public Choice , 67:11-33, 1990. Richardson, L.E. 1990. “Public policy and representation: Social security as a case study”. Unpublished dissertation, University of Texas. Robert. Meyers. 1970. resignation letter to Robert Finch, Congressional Record(June 3, 1970). Roming, Kathleen. 2016. “Revenue Options Would Help Close Social Security Shortfall”.http://www.cbpp.org/blog/revenue-options-would-help-close-social-security-shortfall. October 19, 2016. Romer, Christina. 1992. “What Ended the Great Depression?”. Journal of Economic History. 52 (4): 757-784. Roosevelt, Franklin. 1944. Statement Accompanying the Signing of H.R. 5564, “An Act to Fix the Tax Under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act,on Employer and Employees for Calendar Year 1945”. December 16. Ruffing, Kathy and Water, Paul. 2016. “Social security Benefits Are Modest: Policymakers Have Limited Room to Reduce Benefits Without Causing Hardship”. http://www.cbpp.org/research/social-security/social-security-benefits-are-modest. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. August1, 2016. Schieber, Sylvester and Shoven, John. 1999. The Real Deal: The History and Future of Social Security. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Snee, John and Ross, Mary. 1978. “Social Security Amendments of 1977:Legislation History and Summary of Provision”. Social Security Bulletin, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, March 1978. Snee, John and Ross, Mary. 1983. “Social Security Amendments of 1983:Legislation History and Summary of Provision”. Social Security Bulletin, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, March 1983. Solomon, Lewis. 2005. Financial Security and Personal Wealth. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 135. SSA, 2016. “Annual Statistical Supplement To The Social Security Bulletin, 2015”. SSA Publication No.13-11700. The Board of Trustees. 1972-1977; 1983; 2016. “Annual report of the board of trustees of the federal old-age and survivors insurance and federal disability insurance trust funds”. Washington: U.S. Government Publishing Office. Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How Institutionalism Evolves: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis”. Pp. 208-40 in James Mahoney and James Rueschemeyer, eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tucker, Jasmine, Reno, Virginia and Bethell, Thomas. “Strenthening Social Security: What Do American Want? ”. https://www.nasi.org/sites/default/files/research/What_Do_Americans_Want.pdf. National Academy of Social Insurance, January 2013. Tufte, Edward. 1978. Political control of the economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Weaver, Kent. 1988. Automatic Government: The Politics of Indexation.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. William Greider. 1982. “The Education of David Stockman”. Plume, 1st edition . September 30, 1982. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67910 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 美國的老年、遺屬與殘障保險計畫(OASDI)是由聯邦政府主導的一項重要的社會制 度,其覆蓋人群之廣泛,與社會經濟動向聯結之密切,以及其所具有的濃厚的政治性決定了OASDI的每一次制度調整或改革都備受關注。
本研究在對OASDI的發展歷程進行階段劃分的基礎上,考察了各時期制度的給付水準、費率和退休年齡三個重要變數的變化趨勢和主要特徵,并就各時期制度改革背後的社會經濟和政治原因一一進行探究,以期了解OASDI在整個歷史脈絡中的內涵與發展。主要研究結果如下: 一、總體而言,OASDI當前的規模與制度架構是在幾十年的發展與變革中形成。回顧其從成立之初發展至今的整個歷史脈絡,每一次重要修法與變革都是當時的社會經濟背景與政治因素綜合作用的結果。 二、OASDI改革與否首先由其所處的社會經濟環境所決定。維持財務穩定是OASDI計畫運作的基本目標,也是決定OASDI改革的風向標,社會經濟形勢的變化透過影響計畫財務的發展來決定改革是否發生及改革方向。 三、宏觀的社會經濟環境決定了特定時期制度變革之需求,但具體改革方案的選擇以及制度的最終走向則是由政治因素所決定的。關鍵人物之理念、黨派競爭以及選舉等因素直接決定了OASDI之給付、費率與退休年齡的走向及變動幅度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The old age, survivors, and disability insurance (OASDI) is an important social system dominated by the U.S. federal government, which covers a wide range of people, is closely linked to socio-economic trends, and has a strong political nature. All of these features make OASDI a popular system that any adjustment or reform is of concern.
We divide the history of OASDI into four periods. Based on the phase division, this study examines the changing trends of the three important variables of the system in each phase, the level of payment, the payroll tax rate and the retirement age, and analyzes the socio- political reasons behind the trends in order to understand the connotation and development of OASDI in the entire historical context. The main findings are as follows: First, in general, current scale and structure of OASDI is formed in the decades of development and revision. Recalling the whole history of the OASDI from the beginning to the present, every important revision are the result of the combination of the socioeconomic change and political factors at that time. Second, OASDI reform is first decided by the transition of the social and economic environment. To maintain financial stability is the basic objective of the OASDI program, also it is the vane of OASDI reform. The change in the socio-economic situation determines the necessity and the direction of the reform by influencing the OASDI’s financial status. Third, the macro socio-economic environment determines if there is the needs to reform in a particular period, but the specific reform options and the final trend of the system is determined by the political factors. The ideas of key figures, party competition and elections, etc, directly determine the trends and rangeability of the OASDI payment, rates and retirement age. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:57:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04343017-1.pdf: 3215129 bytes, checksum: b66657d0736bb439cab3c0d54800a371 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與研究目的 1 第二節 研究範圍 8 第三節 文獻綜述 13 第四節 研究途徑與研究方法 17 第二章 OASDI之內涵與發展 29 第一節 OASDI之現況特徵 29 第二節 給付、費率及退休年齡之變化趨勢 34 第三節 OASDI之財務收支 52 第四節 變數調整與財務狀況之關係 65 第三章 影響給付、費率及退休年齡之因素 67 第一節 計畫發展初期(1940年代) 68 第二節 計畫擴張期(1950-1972年) 80 第三節 1977年和1983年修法的實現 94 第四節 晚近發展 122 第四章 研究結論 135 參考文獻 142 附錄一 148 附錄二 150 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 政經分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | OASDI | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 給付水準 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 費率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 退休年齡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公共選擇理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | OASDI | en |
| dc.subject | political and economic analysis | en |
| dc.subject | public choice theory | en |
| dc.subject | retirement age | en |
| dc.subject | payment Rate | en |
| dc.title | 美國OASDI計畫之內涵與發展:1935-2015年 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Development of OASDI: 1935-2015 | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪美仁(Mei-Jen Hung),劉志宏(Chin-Hung Liu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | OASDI,給付水準,費率,退休年齡,公共選擇理論,政經分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | OASDI,payment Rate,retirement age,public choice theory,political and economic analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 152 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701612 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.14 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
