請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67801完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | ?慕萱(Mu-Hsuan Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Xiang-Xiang Li | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李翔翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:50:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-27 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-07-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-07-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 方厚政（2013）。上海市專利申請資助政策的效應分析。科學發展，(6)，頁63-68。
王華、賴明勇、柒江藝（2010）。國際技術轉移、異質性與中國企業技術創新研究。管理世界，12，131-142. 中國國家統計局（2014）。第三次全國經濟普查主要資料公報（第一號）。上網時間2015年1月2日，網址：http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201412/P020141216347816258498.pdf 中華全國工商業聯合會（2014）。2013年我國民營經濟貢獻GDP總量超過60％。上網日期2015年1月20日，網址：http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2014-02/28/c_119558098.htm 中國知識產權局（2011）。國家知識產權戰略綱要，上網時間2015年12月21日，網址：http://www.sipo.gov.cn/ztzl/ywzt/zscqzl/200806/t20080612_406335.html 中國知識產權局（2014）。關於深入實施智慧財產權戰略,促進中原經濟區經濟社會發展的若干意見，上網時間2015年12月21日，網址：http://www.sipo.gov.cn/tz/gz/201401/t20140107_895948.html 中國知識產權局（2016）。國知局發佈2015年重要統計資料，上網時間2016年1月10日，網址：http://www.cnipr.com/gonggao/201601/t20160118_194605.html 朱雪忠（2013）。辯證看待中國專利的數量與品質。中國科學院院刊，28(4), 頁435-441。 洪世章（2003）。中國大陸科研機構角色的轉變。科技發展政策報道，202，頁107-119。 英國研究理事會（2009）。中國科研體系架構圖。上網時間2015年1月10日， 網址：www.rcuk.cn/webmap 馬廷燦（2011）。從國家自然科學基金看我國基礎研究力量的變化趨勢。中國科學基金，5，頁282-285. 郭俊華、楊曉穎（2010）。專利資助政策的評估及改進策略研究——以上海市為例。科學學研究，(1)，頁17-25。 溫源 （2012）。國有企業：在攻堅克難中創造輝煌。上網時間2015年1月1日，網址：http://www.sasac.gov.cn/n1180/n1271/n20515/n2697175/14881013.html 財團法人李國鼎科技發展基金會（2007）。中國大陸科技發展資訊現況報告－中國大陸高等學校科研經費的來源及管理。臺北市：財團法人李國鼎科技發展基金會。 Abraham, B. P., & Moitra, S. D. (2001). Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation, 21(4), 245–252. Archibugi, D., & Pietrobelli, C. (2003). The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries: Windows of opportunity or further burden? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(9), 861–883. Arundel, A., & Kabla, I. (1998). What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research policy, 27(2), 127-141. Bacchiocchi, E., & Montobbio, F. (2009). Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2), 169-181. Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2005). Motivations And Incentives For Patenting Within Universities: A Survey Of Italian Inventors. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1-6. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human geography, 28(1), 31-56. Bhattacharya, S., & Nath, P. (2002). Using patent statistics as a measure of “technological assertiveness”: A China India Comparison. Current Science,83(1), 23-29. Breitzman, A. F., & Narin, F. (2001). U.S. Patent No. 6,175,824. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Briggs, K., & Wade, M. (2014). More is better: evidence that joint patenting leads to quality innovation. Applied Economics, 46(35), 4370–4379. Brouwer, E., & Kleinknecht, A. (1999). Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent.: An exploration of CIS micro data. Research Policy, 28(6), 615-624. Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2004). Cooperation and specialization in German technology regions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), 543–562. Capaldo, A., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2014). Partner Geographic and Organizational Proximity and the Innovative Performance of Knowledge-Creating Alliances. European Management Review, 11(1), 63–84. Capellari, S., & De Stefano, D. (2014). University-owned and university-invented patents: a network analysis on two Italian universities. Scientometrics, 99(2), 313-329. Cesaroni, F., & Piccaluga, A. (2005). Universities and intellectual property rights in Southern European countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4), 497–518. Chakrabarti, A. K. (1991). Competition in high technology: analysis of patents of US, Japan, UK, France, West Germany, and Canada. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(1), 78–84. Chan, H. S., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (2009). Public Enterprise Reforms in the United States and the People’s Republic of China: A Drift toward Constitutionalization and Departmentalization of Enterprise Management. Public Administration Review, 69, 38-45. Chang, H. J. (2007). State-owned enterprise reform. UN DESA. Policy note. Chang, S. J., Chung, C. N., & Mahmood, I. P. (2006). When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies. Organization Science, 17(5), 637-656. Chang, K. C., Chen, D. Z., & Huang, M. H. (2012). The relationships between the patent performance and corporation performance. Journal of Informetrics,6(1), 131-139. Chen, Y., Yang, Z., Shu, F., Hu, Z., Meyer, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2009). A patent based evaluation of technological innovation capability in eight economic regions in PR China. World Patent Information, 31(2), 104-110. Cheung, K. Y., & Lin, P. (2004). Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data. China economic review, 15(1), 25-44. Choi, S. B., Lee, S. H., & Williams, C. (2011). Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 40(3), 441–452. Christensen, J. F. (1995). Asset profiles for technological innovation. Research Policy, 24(5), 727–745. Cincera, M. (1997). Patents, R&D, and technological spillovers at the firm level: some evidence from econometric count models for panel data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12(3), 265-280. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596. Comanor, W. S., & Scherer, F. M. (1969). Patent statistics as a measure of technical change. The Journal of Political Economy, 392-398. Cooper, R. G. (1985). Industrial firms’s new product strategies. Journal of Business Research, 13, 107-121. Crespo, N., & Fontoura, M. P. (2007). Determinant Factors of FDI Spillovers – What Do We Really Know? World Development, 35(3), 410–425. Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of “Organizational Lag.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392–409. Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20-32. Douma, S., George, R., & Kabir, R. (2006). Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 637–657. Eisenberg, R. S. (1996). Public research and private development: patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research. Virginia Law Review, 1663-1727. Elvers, D., & hoon Song, C. (2014). R&D Cooperation and Firm Performance-Evaluation of Partnering Strategies in the Automotive Industry. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2(5), 185–193. Ernst, H. (1995). Patenting strategies in the German mechanical engineering industry and their relationship to company performance. Technovation, 15(4), 225-240. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123. Fai, F. M. (2005). Using intellectual property data to analyse China’s growing technological capabilities. World Patent Information, 27(1), 49-61. Fisch, C., Hassel, T. M., Sandner, P. G., & Block, J. H. (2014). 2014 VIP University Patenting: A Comparison of 300 Leading Universities Worldwide. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2433753 Fleming, L., King III, C., & Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18(6), 938-954. Foster, F. H., & Shook, R. L. (1993). Patents, copyrights & trademarks. New York: Wiley. Fritsch, M., & Schwirten, C. (1999). Enterprise-university co-operation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Industry and innovation, 6(1), 69-83. Gao, X., & Guan, J. (2009). Networks of scientific journals: An exploration of Chinese patent data. Scientometrics, 80(1), 283-302. Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790–807. Ginarte, J. C., & Park, W. G. (1997). Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research policy, 26(3), 283-301. Gittelman, M. (2006). National institutions, public–private knowledge flows, and innovation performance: A comparative study of the biotechnology industry in the US and France. Research Policy, 35(7), 1052–1068. Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Simpson, H. (2004). Foreign Ownership and Productivity: New Evidence from the Service Sector and the R&D Lab. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(3), 440–456. Guan, J. C., & Gao, X. (2009). Exploring the h‐index at patent level. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 35-40. Guan, J. C., Yam, R. C., & Mok, C. K. (2005). Collaboration between industry and research institutes/universities on industrial innovation in Beijing, China.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(3), 339-353. Guan, J., & He, Y. (2007). Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science—technology linkages. Scientometrics, 72(3), 403-425. Guadalupe, M., Kuzmina, O., & Thomas, C. (2010). Innovation and Foreign Ownership. National Bureau of Economic Research. Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385. Hagedoorn, J. (2003). Sharing intellectual property rights—an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(5), 1035-1050. Hall, B. H. (2004). Exploring the patent explosion. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2), 35-48. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools (Working Paper No. 8498). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved December 21, 2014, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w8498 Heilmann, S. (2008). Policy Experimentation in China’s Economic Rise. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43(1), 1–26. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119–127. Hu, A. G., & Jefferson, G. H. (2009). A great wall of patents: What is behind China's recent patent explosion?. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 57-68. Huo, D., & Motohashi, K. (2014). Dilemma in Individual Collaboration for Invention: Should We be Similar or Diverse in Knowledge? Retrieved February 5, 2015, from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/56185/ Jin, J., Wang, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). Patterns of R&D internationalisation in developing countries: China as a case. International Journal of Technology Management, 64(2), 276-302. Jinliang, G. (2004). Comparison of IPR management of national S&T projects between USA and China. China Soft Sci, 4, 12-6. Karki, M. M. S. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272. Kortum, S. S. (1997). Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1389-1419. Kortum, S., & Lerner, J. (1999). What is behind the recent surge in patenting?.Research policy, 28(1), 1-22. Kroll, H., & Liefner, I. (2008). Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialisation in a transforming economy—Evidence from three universities in China. Technovation, 28(5), 298–313. Kuemmerle, W. (1997). Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. Harvard business review, 75, 61-72. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (1999). The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7345 Lecocq, C., & Looy, B. V. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the technological performance of regions: time invariant or driven by life cycle dynamics? Scientometrics, 80(3), 845–865. Lee, Y. G. (2008). Patent licensability and life: A study of US patents registered by South Korean public research institutes. Scientometrics, 75(3), 463-471. Lee, M., & Su, H. N. (2014). Technology portfolio, patent litigation probability and firm performance. In Management of Engineering & Technology (PICMET), 2014 Portland International Conference. 870-878 Lei, X. P., Chen, D. Z., Huang, M. H., Zhao, Z. Y., Zhang, X., Zheng, J. & Liu, R. S. (2012). An analysis of innovation competitiveness of China through patent analysis. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 17(2), 17-32. Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. The RAND Journal of Economics, 319-333. Li, X. (2012). Behind the recent surge of Chinese patenting: An institutional view. Research Policy, 41(1), 236-249. Lin, J.-Y., & Lee, C.-C. (2010). Industrial structure and innovation: comparison of innovative performance between South Korea and Taiwan using patent data derived from NBER. International Journal of Technology Management, 49(1), 174–195. Lin, C., Lin, P., & Song, F. (2010). Property rights protection and corporate R&D: Evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 93(1), 49-62. Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2008). Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 87–102. Liu, Y., Cheng, G. P., & Yang, Y. (2006). Patent applications of the top 500 foreign investment corporations in China. Scientometrics, 68(1), 167-177. Liu, X., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research policy, 30(7), 1091-1114. Long, C. (2002). Patent signals. The University of Chicago Law Review, 625-679. Luan, C., Zhou, C., & Liu, A. (2010). Patent strategy in Chinese universities: a comparative perspective. Scientometrics, 84(1), 53–63. Ma, Z., & Lee, Y. (2008). Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980–2005. Technovation, 28(6), 379–390. Maggioni, M. A., & Uberti, T. E. (2008). Knowledge networks across Europe: which distance matters? The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 691–720. Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1996). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy, 25(3), 451–478. Mariano Nieto. (2004). Basic propositions for the study of the technological innovation process in the firm. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 314–324. Meyer, M. (2003). Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness. Research Evaluation, 12(1), 17-27. Montesinos, P., Carot, J. M., Martinez, J. M., & Mora, F. (2008). Third mission ranking for world class universities: Beyond teaching and research. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2-3), 259-271. Moore, K. A. (2000). Judges, Juries, and Patent Cases: An Empirical Peek Inside the Black Box. Michigan Law Review, 365-409. Moser, Martin R. (1984). Measuring Performance in R & D Settings, Research Management, 28(5), 31-34. Motohashi, K. (2008). Assessment of technological capability in science industry linkage in China by patent database. World patent information, 30(3), 225-232. Motohashi, K., & Yun, X. (2007). China's innovation system reform and growing industry and science linkages. Research Policy, 36(8), 1251-1260. Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2001). University Patents and Patent Policy Debates in the USA, 1925–1980. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 781–814 Narin, F., Albert, M., Kroll, P., & Hicks, D. (2000). Inventing our Future. The Link Be (ween Australian Patenting and Basic Science, Commonwealth of Australia. Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research policy, 16(2), 143-155. Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1998). Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics, 41(1-2), 51–59. OECD (2005). OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-owned Enterprises. OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved November 1, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/corporategovernanceofstate-ownedenterprises/34803211.pdf OECD, Eurostat, & European Union. (1997). Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved November 20, 2014, from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/book/9789264192263-en Park, W. G. (2008). International patent protection: 1960–2005. Research policy, 37(4), 761-766. Parthasarthy, R., & Hammond, J. (2002). Product innovation input and outcome: moderating effects of the innovation process. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19(1), 75–91. Pingfang, Z., & Weimin, X. (2003). On The Impact of Government's S&T Incentive Policy on the R&D input and its patent output of large and medium-sized Industrial enterprises in Shanghai. Economic Research Journal, 6, 45-53. Rothwell, R. (1994). Issues in user-producer relations in the innovation process: the role of government. International Journal of Technology Management , 9, 629–649. Ruihua, Q. (2009). Privately-owned enterprise 30 years and the legislative dynamic study. Reformation and Strategy, 25(7), 27–30. Sadowski, B. M., & Sadowski-Rasters, G. (2006). On the innovativeness of foreign affiliates: Evidence from companies in The Netherlands. Research Policy, 35(3), 447-462. Sakakibara, M., & Cho, D. S. (2002). Cooperative R&D in Japan and Korea: a comparison of industrial policy. Research Policy, 31(5), 673-692. Scherer, F. M. (1986). Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives (MIT Press Books). The MIT Press. Retrieved November 1, 2014, from https://ideas.repec.org/b/mtp/titles/0262691027.html Senker, J. (2001). 2001 Senker. Science and Public Policy, 28(4), 277–284. Song, J., 2006. Intellectual property regimes, innovative capabilities, and patenting in Korea. Seoul Journal of Business, 12(2), 57-75. State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China. (2002). Annual Report. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://english.sipo.gov.cn/laws/annualreports/ State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China. (2004). Annual Report. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://english.sipo.gov.cn/laws/annualreports/ State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China. (2009). Annual Report. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://english.sipo.gov.cn/laws/annualreports/ Sun, Y. (2000). Spatial distribution of patents in China. Regional studies, 34(5), 441-454. Sun, Y. (2002). China's national innovation system in transition. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 43(6), 476-492. Sun, Y. (2002). Sources of innovation in China's manufacturing sector: imported or developed in-house?. Environment and Planning A, 34(6), 1059-1072. Sun, Y. (2003). Geographic patterns of industrial innovation in China during the 1990s. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 94(3), 376-389. Sun, Y., & Du, D. (2010). Determinants of industrial innovation in China: Evidence from its recent economic census. Technovation, 30(9–10), 540–550. Tong, X., & Frame, J. D. (1994). Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data. Research Policy, 23(2), 133–141. Tang, M., & Hussler, C. (2011). Betting on indigenous innovation or relying on FDI: The Chinese strategy for catching-up. Technology in Society, 33(1-2), 23-35. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 172-187. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. (1997). University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1), 19–50. Tsukada, N., & Nagaoka, S. (2015). Determinants of International Research Collaboration: Evidence from International Co-Inventions in Asia and Major OECD Countries. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10(1), 96–119. Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656. Wang, C. (2005). Ownership and operating performance of Chinese IPOs.Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1835-1856. Wang, S. J. (2007). Factors to evaluate a patent in addition to citations. Scientometrics, 71(3), 509-522. Wang, X., Ren, J., Zhang, Y., Zhu, D., Qiu, P., & Huang, M. (2014). China’s patterns of international technological collaboration 1976–2010: a patent analysis study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(5), 531–546. Wang, Y., & Li-Ying, J. (2014). How do the BRIC countries play their roles in the global innovation arena? A study based on USPTO patents during 1990–2009. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1065-1083. Wang, Y., Pan, X., Ning, L., Li, J., & Chen, J. (2014). Technology exchange patterns in China: an analysis of regional data. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-21. Wang, Y., Pan, X., Wang, X., Chen, J., Ning, L., & Qin, Y. (2014). Visualizing knowledge space: a case study of Chinese licensed technology, 2000–2012.Scientometrics, 98(3), 1935-1954. Wong, C.-Y., & Yap, X.-S. (2012). Mapping technological innovations through patent analysis: a case study of foreign multinationals and indigenous firms in China. Scientometrics, 91(3), 773–787. Wu, W., & Zhou, Y. (2012). The third mission stalled? Universities in China’s technological progress. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(6), 812-827. Xie, Z. & Zhang, X. (2014). The Patterns of Patents in China. International Food Policy Research Institute, 1-32. Xu, X., & Wang, Y. (1999). Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies. China economic review, 10(1), 75-98. Yahya, F. (2005). State capitalism and government linked companies. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 6(1), 3-31. Yam, R., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F., & Tang, E. P. (2004). An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Research policy, 33(8), 1123-1140. Yamin, M., & Otto, J. (2004). Patterns of knowledge flows and MNE innovative performance. Journal of International Management, 10(2), 239–258. Yang, C.-H., Kuo, C.-C., & Ramstetter, E. D. (2011). Intellectual Property Rights and Patenting in China’s High-technology Industries: Does Ownership Matter? China & World Economy, 19(5), 102–122. Yu, F., & Wu, Y. (2014). Patent citations and knowledge spillovers: an analysis of Chinese patents registered in the USA. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 22(1), 86-99. Zhang, A., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, R. (2001). Impact of Ownership and Competition on the Productivity of Chinese Enterprises. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(2), 327–346. Zhang, G., Guan, J., & Liu, X. (2014). The impact of small world on patent productivity in China. Scientometrics, 98(2), 945-960. Zhang, J., & Rogers, J. D. (2009). The technological innovation performance of Chinese firms: the role of industrial and academic R&D, FDI and the markets in firm patenting. International Journal of Technology Management, 48(4), 518-543. Zhang, S., Yuan, C. C., Chang, K. C., & Ken, Y. (2012). Exploring the nonlinear effects of patent H index, patent citations, and essential technological strength on corporate performance by using artificial neural network. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 485-495. Zheng, J., Zhao, Z. Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D. Z., Huang, M. H., Lei, X. P., ... & Liu, R. S. (2011). Industry evolution and key technologies in China based on patent analysis. Scientometrics, 87(1), 175-188. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67801 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 創新是社會經濟成長的動力，技術創新是創新過程中不可缺少的要素。中國對技術創新尤為重視，並且在全球技術創新生態中扮演了重要的角色。而中國技術創新的發展又離不開學研機構與企業兩大創新主體研發能力的提升。
本研究採用專利計量之方法，以中國學研機構、企業於 1981 年至 2014年獲准的美國專利為研究對象，將專利數量分析結合時間、地域、機構性質等維度，檢視中國專利的整體分佈，比較學研機構專利與企業專利的基本情況。透過專利引文分析與其他特性指標分析，構建模型探析不同專利權人與不同技術領域的專利活動特質及技術創新力。 本研究發現（1）2000 年、2006 年為中國專利成長之關鍵節點，並逐漸由傳統產業領域轉向新興技術領域；（2）學研機構專利偏重傳統產業，企業更重新興技術產業；（3）從整體發展情況上看，學研機構技術創新能力相對下降，企業方面中外企與民企技術創新能力提升，而國企則呈現低迷態勢。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | While innovation is the force behind the economic growth of our society, the technological innovation is the inevitable factor of innovating process. China, which has placed great emphasis on technological innovation, plays an important role in the global ecosystem of technological innovation. The progress of technological innovation in China, meanwhile, is inseparable from the growing research and development ability of its academic research institutions and enterprises.
This study applies patent bibliometrics, targeting Chinese academic research institutions and enterprises patents issued between 1981 and 2014 in USPTO, and combines the analysis of quantity with multiple dimensions of the relevant timing, geographic regions and the nature of entities, to examine the status of Chinese patent, in its entirety, through the lens of comparison between the academic research and enterprise patents. This paper establishes a model, based on an analysis of patent citations and other specific indexes, to further explore and analyze the characteristics of different patent holders in relation to patent activities in different fields regarding the technological innovation capability. The major findings of the study are summarized as follows. (1) Two turning points of China's patents growth appeared in year 2000 and 2006. (2)While academic research institutions attend more to traditional industries, enterprises emphasize more on next generation technologies. (3) Overall speaking, the technological innovation capability of academic research institutions underperform in relative sense; and in the enterprise realm, foreign and private-owned enterprises show growth in technological innovation capability, while state-owned enterprises lack thereof. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:50:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R02126020-1.pdf: 2291951 bytes, checksum: d353f862e4a89eac8fe0af655029cc57 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 II 中文摘要 III 英文摘要 IV 目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 IX 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 7 第三節 研究範圍與限制 9 第四節 名詞解釋 11 第貳章 文獻探討 13 第一節 中國專利 13 第二節 學研機構專利 23 第三節 企業專利 31 第四節 共有專利 39 第五節 從專利角度評量技術創新 45 第參章 研究設計與實施 51 第一節 研究方法與指標 51 第二節 研究設計 55 第三節 研究對象 61 第四節 研究步驟與流程 65 第肆章 研究結果 68 第一節 中國專利活動的整體情況 68 第二節 學研機構專利與企業技術創新力之比較 82 第三節 中國大學、研究機構、國企、民企、外企之技術創新力比較 100 第四節 各技術領域專利權人技術創新力 120 第伍章 結論與建議 135 第一節 結論 135 第二節 建議 140 第三節 後續研究建議 142 參考文獻 144 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 中國學研機構與企業技術創新力之比較研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Comparing the Technological Innovation Capability between Chinese Academic Institutions and Enterprises | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳達仁(Dar-Zen Chen),吳春光(Chun-Kuang Wu),蔡萬助(Wan-Chu Tsai) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 技術創新,中國,學研機構,企業,專利計量, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | technological innovation,China,academic research institutions,enterprises,bibliometrics, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 158 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701897 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-25 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.24 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。