請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67346
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 劉?睿 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ching-Wen Su | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蘇靖雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:28:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-10 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-10 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 林駿奇(2009)。作物青枯病之生態與防治。花蓮區農業專訊,70,18-21。
林崇寶、方關珽、許資敏、楊雯馨、胡淼琳(2014)。液化澱粉芽孢桿菌 BPD1 發酵配方測試。農林學報,63(4),247-255。 周浩平、陳以錚(2016)。應用液化澱粉芽孢桿菌PMB01防治作物土壤傳播性病害。農政與農情,283,100-102。 曾國欽、徐世典(2003)。重要植物細菌性病害之診斷鑑定。植物重要防檢疫病害診斷鑑定技術研習會專刊,2,95-115。 黃筑寗(2014)。篩選台灣土壤細菌應用於茄科青枯病之防治。國立臺灣大學植物醫學碩士學位學程碩士論文。 農藥資訊服務網(2015)。行政院動植物防疫檢疫局。檢自https://pesticide.baphiq.gov.tw/web/Insecticides_MenuItem5_5_B.aspx?tp=1&id1=C0909&id2=C18&sign=X。 潘蕙如(2015)。植物內生細菌Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SPX1於番茄組織內的纏據急防治番茄青枯病的效果。國立公興大學植物病理學系碩士論文。 謝奉家(2012)。具商品化潛力之多功能液化澱粉芽孢桿菌。農業生技產業季刊,32,42-47。 Aime, S., Alabouvette, C., Steinberg, C. and Olivain, C. (2013). The endophytic strain Fusarium oxysporum Fo47: A good candidate for priming the defense responses in tomato roots. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 26(8), 918-926. Allen, C., Prior, P. and Hayward, A. C. (2005). Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. St. Paul, MN: APS Press. Andreote, F. D., de Araujo, W. L., de Azevedo, J. L., van Elsas, J. D., da Rocha, U. N. and van Overbeek, L. S. (2009). Endophytic colonization of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) by a novel competent bacterial endophyte, Pseudomonas putida strain P9, and its effect on associated bacterial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75(11), 3396-3406. Andreote, F. D., Gullo, M. J., de Souza Lima, A. O., Junior, W. M., Azevedo, J. L. and Araujo, W. L. (2004). Impact of genetically modified Enterobacter cloacae on indigenous endophytic community of Citrus sinensis seedlings. Journal of Microbiology, 42(3), 169-173. Andreote, F. D., Rocha, U. N., Araujo, W. L., Azevedo, J. L. and van Overbeek, L. S. (2010). Effect of bacterial inoculation, plant genotype and developmental stage on root-associated and endophytic bacterial communities in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 97(4), 389-399. Ardanov, P., Lyastchenko, S., Karppinen, K., Haggman, H., Kozyrovska, N. and Pirttila, A. M. (2016). Effects of Methylobacterium sp on emergence, yield, and disease prevalence in three cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) were associated with the shift in endophytic microbial community. Plant and Soil, 405(1-2), 299-310. Ardanov, P., Sessitsch, A., Haggman, H., Kozyrovska, N. and Pirttila, A. M. (2012). Methylobacterium-induced endophyte community changes correspond with protection of plants against pathogen attack. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e46802. Arnold, A. E., Maynard, Z., Gilbert, G. S., Coley, P. D. and Kursar, T. A. (2000). Are tropical fungal endophytes hyperdiverse? Ecology Letters, 3(4), 267-274. Azevedo, J. L., Maccheroni, J., W., Pereira, J. O. and Araújo, W. L. (2000). Endophytic microorganisms: a review on insect control and recent advances on tropical plants. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 3(1), 15-16. Baindara, P., Mandal, S. M., Chawla, N., Singh, P. K., Pinnaka, A. K. and Korpole, S. (2013). Characterization of two antimicrobial peptides produced by a halotolerant Bacillus subtilis strain SK.DU.4 isolated from a rhizosphere soil sample. AMB Express, 3(1), 2. Baker, K. F. and Cook, R. J. (1974). Biological control of plant pathogens. WH Freeman and Company. Beattie, G. A. (2007). Plant-associated bacteria: survey, molecular phylogeny, genomics and recent advances. Springer. Berg, G., Eberl, L. and Hartmann, A. (2005). The rhizosphere as a reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria. Environmental Microbiology, 7(11), 1673-1685. Berg, G. and Hallmann, J. (2006). Control of plant pathogenic fungi with bacterial endophytes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Bodrossy, L., Kovacs, K. L., McDonald, I. R. and Murrell, J. C. (1999). A novel thermophilic methane-oxidising gamma-Proteobacterium. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 170(2), 335-341. Boller, T. and Felix, G. (2009). A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 60, 379-406. Buddenhagen, I., Sequeira, L. and Kelman, A. (1962). Designation of races in Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology, 52, 726. Bultman, T. L. and Murphy, J. C. (2000). Do fungal endophytes mediate wound-induced resistance? New York: CRC Press. Campbell, W. A. (1947). A new species of Coniothyrium parasitic on sclerotia. Mycologia, 39(2), 190-195. Chaturvedi, H., Singh, V. and Gupta, G. (2016). Potential of bacterial endophytes as plant growth promoting factors. Journal of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, 7(9), 1-6. Chen, Y., Zhang, W. Z., Liu, X., Ma, Z. H., Li, B., Allen, C. and Guo, J. H. (2010). A real-time PCR assay for the quantitative detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in the horticultural soil and plant tissues. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 20(1), 193-201. Chen, Y. Y., Lin, Y. M., Chao, T. C., Wang, J. F., Liu, A. C., Ho, F. I. and Cheng, C. P. (2009). Virus-induced gene silencing reveals the involvement of ethylene-, salicylic acid- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-related defense pathways in the resistance of tomato to bacterial wilt. Physiologia Plantarum, 136(3), 324-335. Choi, J., Baek, K. H. and Moon, E. (2014). Antimicrobial effects of a hexapetide KCM21 against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. The Plant Pathology Journal, 30(3), 245-253. Chowdhury, S. P., Hartmann, A., Gao, X. W. and Borriss, R. (2015). Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 – a review. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 780. Clark, I. M. and Hirsch, P. R. (2008). Survival of bacterial DNA and culturable bacteria in archived soils from the Rothamsted Broadbalk experiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(5), 1090-1102. Compaore, C. S., Nielsen, D. S., Sawadogo-Lingani, H., Berner, T. S., Nielsen, K. F., Adimpong, D. B., Diawara, B., Ouedraogo, G. A., Jakobsen, M. and Thorsen, L. (2013). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ssp. plantarum strains as potential protective starter cultures for the production of Bikalga, an alkaline fermented food. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 115(1), 133-146. Conn, V. M. and Franco, C. M. (2004a). Analysis of the endophytic actinobacterial population in the roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing of 16S rRNA clones. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70(3), 1787-1794. Conn, V. M. and Franco, C. M. M. (2004b). Effect of microbial inoculants on the indigenous Actinobacterial endophyte population in the roots of wheat as determined by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70(11), 6407-6413. Conrath, U. (2006). Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 1(4), 179-184. De Bary, A. (1866). Morphologie und physiologie der pilze, flechten und myxomyceten. Leipzig: Hofmeister’s Handbook of Physiological Botany. De Meyer, G., Capieau, K., Audenaert, K., Buchala, A., Metraux, J. P. and Hofte, M. (1999). Nanogram amounts of salicylic acid produced by the rhizobacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 activate the systemic acquired resistance pathway in bean. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 12(5), 450-458. de Oliveira Costa, L. E., de Queiroz, M. V., Borges, A. C., de Moraes, C. A. and de Araujo, E. F. (2012). Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria isolated from the leaves of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 43(4), 1562-1575. Dodds, P. N. and Rathjen, J. P. (2010). Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11(8), 539-548. Dutta, D., Puzari, K. C., Gogoi, R. and Dutta, P. (2014). Endophytes: Exploitation as a tool in plant protection. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 57(5), 621-629. Effmert, U., Kalderás, J., Warnke, R. and Piechulla, B. (2012). Volatile mediated interactions between bacteria and fungi in the soil. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 38(6), 665-703. Eljounaidi, K., Lee, S. K. and Bae, H. (2016). Bacterial endophytes as potential biocontrol agents of vascular wilt diseases – Review and future prospects. Biological Control, 103, 62-68. Ferreira, A., Quecine, M. C., Lacava, P. T., Oda, S., Azevedo, J. L. and Araujo, W. L. (2008). Diversity of endophytic bacteria from Eucalyptus species seeds and colonization of seedlings by Pantoea agglomerans. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 287(1), 8-14. Francis, I., Holsters, M. and Vereecke, D. (2010). The gram-positive side of plant-microbe interactions. Environmental Microbiology, 12(1), 1-12. Gaiero, J. R., McCall, C. A., Thompson, K. A., Day, N. J., Best, A. S. and Dunfield, K. E. (2013). Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. American Journal of Botany, 100(9), 1738-1750. Genin, S. and Denny, T. P. (2012). Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 50(1), 67-89. Glazebrook, J. (2005). Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 43, 205-227. Hallmann, J., QuadtHallmann, A., Mahaffee, W. F. and Kloepper, J. W. (1997). Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 43(10), 895-914. Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S. and van Elsas, J. D. (2008). Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends in Microbiology, 16(10), 463-471. Hartmann, M., Berditsch, M., Hawecker, J., Ardakani, M. F., Gerthsen, D. and Ulrich, A. S. (2010). Damage of the bacterial cell envelope by antimicrobial peptides gramicidin S and PGLa as revealed by transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 54(8), 3132-3142. Hayward, A. C. (1964). Characteristics of Pseudomonas solanacearum. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 27(2), 265-277. Hayward, A. C. (1991). Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas Solanacearum. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 29(1), 65-87. He, L. Y., Sequeira, L. and Kelman, A. (1983). Characteristics of strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum from China. Plant Disease, 67, 1357-1361. Henry, G., Thonart, P. and Ongena, M. (2012). PAMPs, MAMPs, DAMPs and others: an update on the diversity of plant immunity elicitors. Biotechnologie Agronomie Societe Et Environnement, 16(2), 257-268. Ho, F. I., Chen, Y. Y., Lin, Y. M., Cheng, C. P. and Wang, J. F. (2009). A tobacco rattle virus-induced gene silencing system for a soil-borne vascular pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Botanical Studies, 50(4), 413-424. Hoffland, E., Pieterse, C. M. J., Bik, L. and van Pelt, J. A. (1995). Induced systemic resistance in radish is not associated with accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 46(4), 309-320. Huang, C.-N., Lin, C.-P., Hsieh, F.-C., Lee, S.-K., Cheng, K.-C. and Liu, C.-T. (2016). Characterization and evaluation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain WF02 regarding its biocontrol activities and genetic responses against bacterial wilt in two different resistant tomato cultivars. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(11), 183. Kempe, J. and Sequeira, L. (1983). Biological control of bacterial wilt of potatoes: Attempts to induce resistance by treating tubers with bacteria. Plant Disease, 67, 499-503. Kloepper, J. W., Leong, J., Teintze, M. and Schroth, M. N. (1980). Enhanced plant-growth by siderophores produced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Nature, 286(2), 885-886. Kloepper, J. W., Ryu, C. M. and Zhang, S. (2004). Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology, 94(11), 1259-1266. Koumoutsi, A., Chen, X. H., Henne, A., Liesegang, H., Hitzeroth, G., Franke, P., Vater, J. and Borriss, R. (2004). Structural and functional characterization of gene clusters directing nonribosomal synthesis of bioactive cyclic lipopeptides in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FZB42. Journal of Bacteriology, 186(4), 1084-1096. Krings, M., Taylor, T. N., Hass, H., Kerp, H., Dotzler, N. and Hermsen, E. J. (2007). Fungal endophytes in a 400-million-yr-old land plant: infection pathways, spatial distribution, and host responses. New Phytologist, 174(3), 648-657. Kulkarni, J. H. and Patil, R. B. (1982). Production and utilization of extracellular slime by Pseudomonas solanacearum and its role on survival at different relative humidities. Acta Microbiologica Polonica, 31(2), 159-165. Li, B., Li, Q., Xu, Z. H., Zhang, N., Shen, Q. R. and Zhang, R. F. (2014). Responses of beneficial Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to different soilborne fungal pathogens through the alteration of antifungal compounds production. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 636. Li, H. H., Chen, Q. S., Zhao, J. W. and Urmila, K. (2015). Enhancing the antimicrobial activity of natural extraction using the synthetic ultrasmall metal nanoparticles. Scientific Reports, 5, 11033. Liao, J. H., Chen, P. Y., Yang, Y. L., Kan, S. C., Hsieh, F. C. and Liu, Y. C. (2016). Clarification of the antagonistic effect of the lipopeptides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BPD1 against Pyricularia oryzae via in situ MALDI-TOF IMS analysis. Molecules, 21(12), 1670. Liu, H., Kang, Y., Genin, S., Schell, M. A. and Denny, T. P. (2001). Twitching motility of Ralstonia solanacearum requires a type IV pilus system. Microbiology, 147(12), 3215-3229. Liu, W., Yuan, J. S. and Stewart, C. N., Jr. (2013). Advanced genetic tools for plant biotechnology. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14(11), 781-793. Mercado-Blanco, J. and J. J. Lugtenberg, B. (2014). Biotechnological applications of bacterial endophytes. Current Biotechnology, 3(1), 60-75. Mishina, T. E. and Zeier, J. (2007). Pathogen-associated molecular pattern recognition rather than development of tissue necrosis contributes to bacterial induction of systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal, 50(3), 500-513. Niu, D. D., Liu, H. X., Jiang, C. H., Wang, Y. P., Wang, Q. Y., Jin, H. L. and Guo, J. H. (2011). The plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156 induces systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana by simultaneously activating salicylate- and jasmonate/ethylene-dependent signaling pathways. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 24(5), 533-542. Ongena, M. and Jacques, P. (2008). Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends in Microbiology, 16(3), 115-125. Parent, Z. K., Anthony, A. A., Laurent, F., Sébastien, S. and Marc, O. (2017). Stimulation of fengycin-type antifungal lipopeptides in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in the presence of the maize fungal pathogen Rhizomucor variabilis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 850. Pel, M. J. and Pieterse, C. M. (2013). Microbial recognition and evasion of host immunity. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(5), 1237-1248. Peng, A., Liu, J., Gao, Y. and Chen, Z. (2013). Distribution of endophytic bacteria in Alopecurus aequalis Sobol and Oxalis corniculata L. from soils contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e83054. Pieterse, C. M., van Wees, S. C., van Pelt, J. A., Knoester, M., Laan, R., Gerrits, H., Weisbeek, P. J. and van Loon, L. C. (1998). A novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 10(9), 1571-1580. Pieterse, C. M., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. and Bakker, P. A. (2014). Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 52, 347-375. Pieterse, C. M. J., vanWees, S. C. M., Hoffland, E., vanPelt, J. A. and vanLoon, L. C. (1996). Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression. Plant Cell, 8(8), 1225-1237. Podolich, O., Ardanov, P., Zaets, I., Pirttila, A. M. and Kozyrovska, N. (2015). Reviving of the endophytic bacterial community as a putative mechanism of plant resistance. Plant and Soil, 388(1-2), 367-377. Podolich, О., Ardanov, P. Y., Voznyuk, T. M., Kovalchuk, M. V., Danylchenko, O. V., Laschevskyi, V. V., Lyastchenko, S. A. and Kozyrovska, N. O. (2007). Endophytic bacteria from activated by exogenic non-pathogenic bacteria. Biopolymers and Cell, 23(1), 21-27. Raaijmakers, J. M., Vlami, M. and de Souza, J. T. (2002). Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 81(1-4), 537-547. Raza, W., Ling, N., Liu, D., Wei, Z., Huang, Q. and Shen, Q. (2016). Volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens WR-1 restrict the growth and virulence traits of Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbiological Research, 192, 103-113. Reiter, B., Pfeifer, U., Schwab, H. and Sessitsch, A. (2002). Response of endophytic bacterial communities in potato plants to infection with Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(5), 2261-2268. Ren, J.-H., Li, H., Wang, Y.-F., Ye, J.-R., Yan, A.-Q. and Wu, X.-Q. (2013). Biocontrol potential of an endophytic Bacillus pumilus JK-SX001 against poplar canker. Biological Control, 67(3), 421-430. Rosenblueth, M. and Martinez-Romero, E. (2006). Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 19(8), 827-837. Ross, A. F. (1961). Systemic acquired resistance induced by localized virus infections in plants. Virology, 14, 340-358. Ryan, A. D., Kinkel, L. L. and Schottel, J. L. (2004). Effect of pathogen isolate, potato cultivar, and antagonist strain on potato scab severity and biological control. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 14(3), 301-311. Saile, E., McGarvey, J. A., Schell, M. A. and Denny, T. P. (1997). Role of extracellular polysaccharide and endoglucanase in root invasion and colonization of tomato plants by Ralstonia solanacearum. Phytopathology, 87(12), 1264-1271. Schenk, P. M., Kazan, K., Wilson, I., Anderson, J. P., Richmond, T., Somerville, S. C. and Manners, J. M. (2000). Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(21), 11655-11660. Seghers, D., Wittebolle, L., Top, E. M., Verstraete, W. and Siciliano, S. D. (2004). Impact of agricultural practices on the Zea mays L. endophytic community. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70(3), 1475-1482. Sessitsch, A., Reiter, B., Pfeifer, U. and Wilhelm, E. (2002). Cultivation-independent population analysis of bacterial endophytes in three potato varieties based on eubacterial and Actinomycetes-specific PCR of 16S rRNA genes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 39(1), 23-32. Shafi, J., Tian, H. and Ji, M. S. (2017). Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 31(3), 446-459. Singh, D. P., Singh, H. B. and Prabha, R. (2016). Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity. Springer India. Smith, E. F. (1896). A bacterial disease of the tomato, eggplant and Irish potato (Bacillus solanacearum n. sp.). Washington: G.P.O. Smith, K. P., Handelsman, J. and Goodman, R. M. (1997). Modeling dose-response relationships in biological control: Partitioning host responses to the pathogen and biocontrol agent. Phytopathology, 87(7), 720-729. Song, G. C. and Ryu, C. M. (2013). Two volatile organic compounds trigger plant self-defense against a bacterial pathogen and a sucking insect in cucumber under open field conditions. International journal of molecular sciences, 14(5), 9803-9819. Song, Y. A. Y. A., Zeng, R. S., Xu, J. A. F., Li, J., Shen, X. A. and Yihdego, W. G. (2010). Interplant communication of tomato plants through underground common mycorrhizal networks. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13324. Sun, K., Liu, J., Gao, Y. Z., Jin, L., Gu, Y. J. and Wang, W. Q. (2014). Isolation, plant colonization potential, and phenanthrene degradation performance of the endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas sp Ph6-gfp. Scientific Reports, 4, 5462. Tahir, H. A., Gu, Q., Wu, H., Niu, Y., Huo, R. and Gao, X. (2017). Bacillus volatiles adversely affect the physiology and ultra-structure of Ralstonia solanacearum and induce systemic resistance in tobacco against bacterial wilt. Scientific Reports, 7, 40481. Tan, S., Gu, Y., Yang, C., Dong, Y., Mei, X., Shen, Q. and Xu, Y. (2016). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens T-5 may prevent Ralstonia solanacearum infection through competitive exclusion. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 52(3), 341-351. Tans-Kersten, J., Brown, D. and Allen, C. (2004). Swimming motility, a virulence trait of Ralstonia solanacearum, is regulated by FlhDC and the plant host environment. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 17(6), 686-695. Tans-Kersten, J., Huang, H. and Allen, C. (2001). Ralstonia solanacearum needs motility for invasive virulence on tomato. Journal of Bacteriology, 183(12), 3597-3605. Thomas, P., Swarna, G. K., Patil, P. and Rawal, R. D. (2008). Ubiquitous presence of normally non-culturable endophytic bacteria in field shoot-tips of banana and their gradual activation to quiescent cultivable form in tissue cultures. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 93(1), 39-54. Upreti, R. and Thomas, P. (2015). Root-associated bacterial endophytes from Ralstonia solanacearum resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars and their pathogen antagonistic effects. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 255. Vallad, G. E. and Goodman, R. M. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Science, 44(6), 1920-1934. van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M. and Pieterse, C. M. J. (1998). Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 36, 453-483. van Loon, L. C., Rep, M. and Pieterse, C. M. (2006). Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 44, 135-162. Vasse, J., Frey, P. and Trigalet, A. (1995). Microscopic studies of intercellular infection and protoxylem invasion of tomato boots by Pseudomonas solanacearum. The American Phytopathological Society, 8(2), 241-251. Weisskopf, L. (2013). The potential of bacterial volatiles for crop protection against phytophathogenic fungi. Microbial pathogens and strategies for combating them: science, technology and education, 1352-1363. Wilson, D. (1995). Endophyte: The evolution of a term, and clarification of its use and definition. Oikos, 73(2), 274-276. Wu, L., Wu, H., Chen, L., Yu, X., Borriss, R. and Gao, X. (2015a). Difficidin and bacilysin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 have antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens. Scientific Reports, 5, 12975. Wu, L., Wu, H. J., Qiao, J., Gao, X. and Borriss, R. (2015b). Novel routes for improving biocontrol activity of Bacillus based bioinoculants. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 1395. Wu, S., Peiffer, M., Luthe, D. S. and Felton, G. W. (2012). ATP hydrolyzing salivary enzymes of caterpillars suppress plant defenses. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e41947. Xue, Q.-Y., Chen, Y., Li, S.-M., Chen, L.-F., Ding, G.-C., Guo, D.-W. and Guo, J.-H. (2009). Evaluation of the strains of Acinetobacter and Enterobacter as potential biocontrol agents against Ralstonia wilt of tomato. Biological Control, 48(3), 252-258. Zaets, I. and Kozyrovska, N. (2012). Heavy metal resistance in plants: A putative role of endophytic bacteria. Vienna: Springer Vienna. Zipfel, C. and Robatzek, S. (2010). Pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity: veni, vidi...? Plant Physiology, 154(2), 551-554. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67346 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 青枯病是由Ralstonia solanacearum所引起的土傳性病害,為台灣番茄栽培重要限制因子之一。青枯病菌能夠侵入植物根部組織,快速移動至維管束並散佈至全株,使罹病植物急速萎凋而死亡。台灣目前針對青枯病唯一核可的防治方法為施用生物防治菌。內生菌存在於植物組織中,較不受外在環境變化所影響,具有穩定的生存空間,因此近年來應用內生菌作為生物防治菌逐漸受到重視。先前研究已知Bacillus amyloliquafaciens BPD1(Ba-BPD1)能夠促進植物生長並具有拮抗多種植物病原菌的能力。本研究主要探討Ba-BPD1防治番茄青枯病的可能機制,以及是否能夠穩定存在於番茄組織及對植物內生菌相造成的影響。結果顯示Ba-BPD1培養於大豆配方培養基具有最佳抑制活性,無菌上清液能夠影響青枯病菌的移動性及細胞型態。分析Ba-BPD1的gDNA發現具有合成至少6種抑菌化合物的基因,包括bacillaene、macrolactin、difficidin、bacillomycin D、bacillibactinc和bacillycin。另外,Ba-BPD1產生的揮發性有機化合物亦能夠影響青枯病菌菌落生成大小、移動性及細胞型態。盆栽試驗中,前處理Ba-BPD1使聖女番茄青枯病罹病度下降39.6%。進一步探討其抗青枯病的可能作用機制,結果發現介質中青枯病菌數量並未受到Ba-BPD1的處理而顯著下降;另一方面,Ba-BPD1在聖女番茄受青枯病侵襲時,引起由茉莉酸和乙烯作為訊號分子的植物抗性;此外,連續施用Ba-BPD1三週能夠提升番茄之生質量。最後並證實Ba-BPD1能夠進入番茄組織中,同時造成番茄內生菌多樣性及結構改變。綜合上述結果,Ba-BPD1因能夠產生抑菌化合物、誘導植物系統性抗病、纏據於植物組織中,影響內生菌相組成並且促進植物的生長,故十分有潛力作為防治番茄青枯病的生物防治菌。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Bacterial wilt, which is caused by the soil-borne pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum (Rs), is one of the most serious diseases in tomato plant. Rs can invade plant roots and spread quickly into the xylem vessels toward the whole plant tissue through the vascular system. Symptoms of this disease include stunting, vascular browning, wilting, and even causing plant death. In Taiwan, the disease caused by Rs is managed only by using beneficial microorganisms. Nowadays, the study of endophytic bacteria in plants and their applications on biological control of plant pathogens are gaining a lot of interest. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BPD1 (Ba-BPD1) has been shown to have plant-growth-promoting effects and the ability to produce several types of antimicrobial compounds against plant pathogens. In this study, we found that Ba-BPD1 has the biggest inhibition zone against Rs when incubated in LMS medium. Furthermore, after treatment with 5 μl/ml of the culture supernatant of Ba-BPD1, the Rs population decreased to 20% and their motility activity also decreased as well as the morphology of Rs cells. To identify the antimicrobial compounds probably present in the supernatant, six gene fragments of antimicrobial compounds, including bacillaene, macrolactin, difficidin, bacillomycin D, bacillibactinc, and bacillycin, were amplified from Ba-BPD1 through PCR analysis. Moreover, we also found that volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by Ba-BPD1 had negative effects on the colony size, morphology, and motility activity of Rs. In the pot experiments, we found that treatment with Ba-BPD1 could reduce the Rs disease severity by 39.6% in tomato cv. Santa. To further understand the mechanism of Ba-BPD1 inhibition of tomato plant wilting, we evaluated the pathogen populations in soil and the expression levels of the defense-related genes in leaf after Ba-BPD1 treatment. The results revealed that the soil pathogen populations were not significantly decreased after Ba-BPD1 treatment. On the other hand, gene expression levels of the AOC and ACO genes, which are involved in the JA and ET pathways, respectively, were increased after pathogen inoculation in Ba-BPD1 treatment. On the other hand, the growth of tomato seedling was influenced by Ba-BPD1 inoculation. Last but not the least, our experiments showed that Ba-BPD1 could colonize into the tomato plant and the populations reached up to 3.7×104 CFU/g tissue at the basal parts of the inoculation site (0-2 cm). Otherwise, composition of the endophyte community in root and diversity of the endophyte community in root and stem tissues changed in response to inoculation were correlated with tomato resistance to the disease. Thus, this study demonstrated that Ba-BPD1 has a potential to be used as a biocontrol agent in controlling tomato plant wilting caused by Rs as it is able to produce antimicrobial compounds, induce plant systemic resistance, colonize plant tissues in a stable manner, modulate the endophyte community of the host and also promote plant growth. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:28:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04642007-1.pdf: 3680210 bytes, checksum: d3a153e3c4b275c15f7554e3eaf8e778 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 xi 壹、文獻探討 1 一、青枯病 1 (一)青枯病菌之分類及寄主範圍 1 (二)青枯病好發環境 2 (三)青枯病菌感染途徑及傳播方式 2 (四)青枯病菌的毒力因子 3 (五)青枯病之病害管理 3 二、植物病害生物防治法 4 (一)超寄生 4 (二)抗生 5 (三)競爭養分及生存環境 5 (四)誘導植物產生系統性抗病 6 三、植物內生菌 8 (一)植物內生菌之定義 8 (二)植物內生細菌的多樣性 8 (三)植物內生菌對植物病害防治之研究 9 (四)植物內生菌族群與植物病害之關係 10 四、生物防治細菌 B. amyloliquefaciens BPD1之研究 11 貮、材料與方法 14 一、實驗架構 14 二、供試菌株的來源及其培養條件 15 (一)防治菌株 15 (二)青枯病菌 15 三、供試植物之來源及種植條件 15 四、Ba-BPD1於in vitro對青枯病菌之生長影響 16 (一)Ba-BPD1於不同培養基培養下對青枯病菌之拮抗效果 16 (二)Ba-BPD1無菌上清液對青枯病菌之生長影響 17 (三)Ba-BPD1生成抑菌活性化合物潛力測定 18 (四)Ba-BPD1揮發性有機化合物對青枯病菌之影響 19 五、Ba-BPD1於番茄盆栽試驗之防治青枯病效果與機制 20 (一)盆栽防治試驗 20 (二)番茄栽培介質中之青枯病菌及Ba-BPD1數量測定 22 (三)植物免疫反應相關基因表現測定 24 (四)Ba-BPD1對聖女番茄生長影響 25 六、Ba-BPD1於番茄之內生能力及對內生菌組成影響 26 (一)Ba-BPD1於番茄之內生性試驗 26 (二)Ba-BPD1內生於番茄組織之菌量 26 (三)次世代定序分析聖女番茄之內生菌相 26 叁、結果 31 一、Ba-BPD1對青枯病菌之生長影響 31 (一)Ba-BPD1培養於三種培養基對兩株青枯病菌之拮抗效果 31 (二)Ba-BPD1之無菌上清液對青枯病菌生長影響 37 (三)Ba-BPD1產生之揮發性有機化合物對青枯病菌生長影響 45 二、Ba-BPD1防治番茄青枯病效果評估及作用機制探討 50 (一)Ba-BPD1防治番茄青枯病之效果 50 (二)Ba-BPD1防治番茄青枯病之作用機制探討 54 三、Ba-BPD1於番茄之內生試驗及對番茄內生菌相之影響 60 (一)Ba-BPD1於番茄之內生性 60 (二)Ba-BPD1於聖女番茄組織內之分布情況 63 (三)Ba-BPD1對番茄內生菌相之影響 65 肆、討論 73 伍、結論 81 參考文獻 82 附錄 93 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 液化澱粉芽孢桿菌BPD1防治番茄青枯病之潛力 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BPD1 for control of bacterial wilt of tomato | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉啟德,沈偉強,謝奉家,謝建元 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 青枯病,番茄,生物防治,液化澱粉芽孢桿菌,內生菌,誘導植物系統性抗性,內生菌相, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | bacterial wilt,tomato,biocontrol,Bacillus amyloliquefaciens,endophytes,induced systemic resistance,endophyte community, | en |
dc.relation.page | 98 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201702236 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-07 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物科技研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物科技研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.59 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。