請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67216完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭年真(Nien-Chen Kuo) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ya-Hsuan Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王雅萱 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:23:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-06-30 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-23 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adams, S. A. (2011). Sourcing the crowd for health services improvement: The reflexive patient and “share-your-experience” websites. Social science medicine, 72(7), 1069-1076.
Bacon, N. (2009). Will doctor rating sites improve standards of care? Yes. Bmj, 338, b1030. Baker, A. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century (Vol. 323): British Medical Journal Publishing Group. Bakhsh, W., Mesfin, A. (2014). Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews. Am J Orthop, 43(8), 359-363. Bardach, N. S., Asteria-Penaloza, R., Boscardin, W. J., Dudley, R. A. (2013). The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA. Bmj Quality Safety, 22(3), 194-202. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001360 Beaussier, A. L., Demeritt, D., Griffiths, A., Rothstein, H. (2020). Steering by their own lights: Why regulators across Europe use different indicators to measure healthcare quality. Health Policy, 124(5), 501-510. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.012 Berwick, D. M. (2002). A user's manual for the IOM's 'quality chasm' report. Health Affairs, 21(3), 80-90. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.80 Boylan, A. M., Williams, V., Powell, J. Online patient feedback: a scoping review and stakeholder consultation to guide health policy. Journal of Health Services Research Policy, 8. doi:10.1177/1355819619870837 Boylan, A. M., Williams, V., Powell, J. (2019). Online patient feedback: a scoping review and stakeholder consultation to guide health policy. Journal of Health Services Research Policy, 8. doi:10.1177/1355819619870837 Brody, S., Elhadad, N. (2010). An unsupervised aspect-sentiment model for online reviews. Paper presented at the Human language technologies: The 2010 annual conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics. Brookes, G., Baker, P. (2017). What does patient feedback reveal about the NHS? A mixed methods study of comments posted to the NHS Choices online service. BMJ open, 7(4), e013821. Burkle, C. M., Keegan, M. T. (2015). Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians. Bmc Health Services Research, 15, 7. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1099-2 Campbell, L., Li, Y. (2018). Are Facebook user ratings associated with hospital cost, quality and patient satisfaction? A cross-sectional analysis of hospitals in New York State. Bmj Quality Safety, 27(2), 119-129. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006291 Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services (CMS), Y. N. H. H. S. C. C. f. O. R. E. C. (2016). Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating on Hospital Compare December 2016 Updates and Specifications Report. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/www/external/health/projects/hospital-performance-report-card/StrRtgDec16PrevQUS_rept_110416.pdf Chang, J. T., Hays, R. D., Shekelle, P. G., MacLean, C. H., Solomon, D. H., Reuben, D. B., . . . Young, R. T. (2006). Patients' global ratings of their health care are not associated with the technical quality of their care. Annals of internal medicine, 144(9), 665-672. Chen, J., Presson, A., Zhang, C., Ray, D., Finlayson, S., Glasgow, R. (2018). Online physician review websites poorly correlate to a validated metric of patient satisfaction. Journal of Surgical Research, 227, 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.037 Cheng, S., Song, H. (2004). Physician performance information and consumer choice: a survey of subjects with the freedom to choose between doctors. Bmj Quality Safety, 13(2), 98-101. Cheng, S.-H., Ho, Y.-C., Chung, K.-P. (2002). Hospital quality information for patients in Taiwan: can they understand it? International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 14(2), 155-160. Chowdhury, A. (2017). What are the top doctor rating and review sites? A deep dive into the best sites for healthcare reviews. Retrieved from https://blog.doctible.com/what-are-the-top-doctor-rating-and-review-sites-20d32ba1ec81 Collier, R. (2012). Professionalism: Logging on to tell your doctor off. In: Can Med Assoc. Daskivich, T., Luu, M., Noah, B., Fuller, G., Anger, J., Spiegel, B. (2018). Differences in Online Consumer Ratings of Health Care Providers Across Medical, Surgical, and Allied Health Specialties: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(5), 10. doi:10.2196/jmir.9160 Daskivich, T. J., Houman, J., Fuller, G., Black, J. T., Kim, H. L., Spiegel, B. (2018). Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(4), 401-407. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx083 Detz, A., López, A., Sarkar, U. (2013). Long-term doctor-patient relationships: patient perspective from online reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(7), e131. Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Milbank memorial fund quarterly, 44(3), 166-206. Donabedian, A. (1988). Quality assessment and assurance: unity of purpose, diversity of means. Inquiry, 173-192. Donnally, C. J., Li, D. J., Maguire, J. A., Roth, E. S., Barker, G. P., McCormick, J. R., . . . Lebwohl, N. H. (2018). How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons. Spine Journal, 18(11), 2081-2090. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.023 Emmert, M., Adelhardt, T., Sander, U., Wambach, V., Lindenthal, J. (2015). A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites. Bmc Health Services Research, 15(1), 414. Emmert, M., Halling, F., Meier, F. (2015). Evaluations of dentists on a German physician rating Website: an analysis of the ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(1), e15. Emmert, M., Meier, F., Heider, A.-K., Dürr, C., Sander, U. (2014). What do patients say about their physicians? An analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website. Health Policy, 118(1), 66-73. Emmert, M., Meier, F., Pisch, F., Sander, U. (2013). Physician Choice Making and Characteristics Associated With Using Physician-Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(8), 16. doi:10.2196/jmir.2702 Emmert, M., Meszmer, N., Sander, U. (2016). Do health care providers use online patient ratings to improve the quality of care? Results from an online-based cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(9), e254. Emmert, M., Meszmer, N., Schlesinger, M. (2018). A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and clinical quality of care measures for US hospitals: results from an observational study. Bmc Health Services Research, 18, 12. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-2886-3 Emmert, M., Sander, U., Esslinger, A., Maryschok, M., Schöffski, O. (2012). Public reporting in Germany: the content of physician rating websites. Methods of information in medicine, 51(02), 112-120. Emmert, M., Sander, U., Pisch, F. (2013). Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(2), 10. doi:10.2196/jmir.2360 Findlay, S. D. (2016). Consumers’ interest in provider ratings grows, and improved report cards and other steps could accelerate their use. Health Affairs, 35(4), 688-696. Friedberg, M. W., SteelFisher, G. K., Karp, M., Schneider, E. C. (2011). Physician groups’ use of data from patient experience surveys. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(5), 498-504. Fung, C. H., Lim, Y.-W., Mattke, S., Damberg, C., Shekelle, P. G. (2008). Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Annals of internal medicine, 148(2), 111-123. Gao, G. G., McCullough, J. S., Agarwal, R., Jha, A. K. (2012). A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients' Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(1), 11. doi:10.2196/jmir.2003 Glover, M., Khalilzadeh, O., Choy, G., Prabhakar, A. M., Pandharipande, P. V., Gazelle, G. S. (2015). Hospital Evaluations by Social Media: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook Ratings among Performance Outliers. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(10), 1440-1446. doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3236-3 Google. (2020). Maps User Contributed Content Policy Help. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/contributionpolicy/answer/7400114?hl=en ref_topic=7422769 Goshtasbi, K., Lehrich, B. M., Moshtaghi, O., Abouzari, M., Sahyouni, R., Bagheri, K., . . . Djalilian, H. R. (2019). Patients' Online Perception and Ratings of Neurotologists. Otology Neurotology, 40(1), 139-143. doi:10.1097/mao.0000000000002075 Greaves, F., Millett, C. (2012). Consistently increasing numbers of online ratings of healthcare in England. J Med Internet Res, 14(3), e94. Greaves, F., Millett, C., Nuki, P. (2014). England’s experience incorporating “anecdotal” reports from consumers into their national reporting system: lessons for the United States of what to do or not to do? Medical Care Research and Review, 71(5_suppl), 65S-80S. Greaves, F., Pape, U. J., King, D., Darzi, A., Majeed, A., Wachter, R. M., Millett, C. (2012a). Associations between internet-based patient ratings and conventional surveys of patient experience in the English NHS: an observational study. Bmj Quality Safety, 21(7), 600-605. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000906 Greaves, F., Pape, U. J., King, D., Darzi, A., Majeed, A., Wachter, R. M., Millett, C. (2012b). Associations Between Web-Based Patient Ratings and Objective Measures of Hospital Quality. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(5), 435-436. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1675 Greaves, F., Pape, U. J., Lee, H., Smith, D. M., Darzi, A., Majeed, A., Millett, C. (2012). Patients' Ratings of Family Physician Practices on the Internet: Usage and Associations With Conventional Measures of Quality in the English National Health Service. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(5), 9. doi:10.2196/jmir.2280 Greaves, F., Ramirez-Cano, D., Millett, C., Darzi, A., Donaldson, L. (2013). Harnessing the cloud of patient experience: using social media to detect poor quality healthcare. Bmj Quality Safety, 22(3), 251-255. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001527 Greaves, F., Ramirez-Cano, D., Millett, C., Darzi, A., Donaldson, L. (2013). Use of sentiment analysis for capturing patient experience from free-text comments posted online. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(11), e239. Griffis, H. M., Kilaru, A. S., Werner, R. M., Asch, D. A., Hershey, J. C., Hill, S., . . . Merchant, R. M. (2014). Use of social media across US hospitals: descriptive analysis of adoption and utilization. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(11), e264. Griffiths, A., Leaver, M. P. (2018). Wisdom of patients: predicting the quality of care using aggregated patient feedback. Bmj Quality Safety, 27(2), 110-118. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006847 Hanauer, D. A., Zheng, K., Singer, D. C., Gebremariam, A., Davis, M. M. (2014a). Parental Awareness and Use of Online Physician Rating Sites. Pediatrics, 134(4), E966-E975. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-0681 Hanauer, D. A., Zheng, K., Singer, D. C., Gebremariam, A., Davis, M. M. (2014b). Public Awareness, Perception, and Use of Online Physician Rating Sites. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 311(7), 734-735. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.283194 Hibbard, J., Sofaer, S. (2010). Best practices in public reporting no. 1: How to effectively present health care performance data to consumers. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Holliday, A. M., Kachalia, A., Meyer, G. S., Sequist, T. D. (2017). Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32(6), 626-631. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-3982-5 Hong, Y. A., Liang, C., Radcliff, T. A., Wigfall, L. T., Street, R. L. (2019). What Do Patients Say About Doctors Online? A Systematic Review of Studies on Patient Online Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), 14. doi:10.2196/12521 Institute, H. R. (2013). Scoring Healthcare: Navigating Customer Experience Ratings. Institute., P. H. R. (2012). Social media “likes” healthcare: from marketing to social business. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/health-industries/library/health-care-social-media.html Jack, R., Burn, M., McCulloch, P., Liberman, S., Varner, K., Harris, J. (2018). Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of orthopaedic surgeons. Musculoskeletal surgery, 102(1), 63-71. Kadry, B., Chu, L. F., Kadry, B., Gammas, D., Macario, A. (2011). Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e95. Lagu, T., Goff, S. L., Hannon, N. S., Shatz, A., Lindenauer, P. K. (2013). A mixed-methods analysis of patient reviews of hospital care in England: implications for public reporting of health care quality data in the United States. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 39(1), 7-AP4. Lagu, T., Hannon, N. S., Rothberg, M. B., Lindenauer, P. K. (2010). Patients' Evaluations of Health Care Providers in the Era of Social Networking: An Analysis of Physician-Rating Websites. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(9), 942-946. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1383-0 Lagu, T., Lindenauer, P. K. (2010). Putting the public back in public reporting of health care quality. JAMA, 304(15), 1711-1712. Lagu, T., Metayer, K., Moran, M., Ortiz, L., Priya, A., Goff, S. L., Lindenauer, P. K. (2017). Website Characteristics and Physician Reviews on Commercial Physician-RatingWebsites. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 317(7), 766-768. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.18553 Liu, C., Uffenheimer, M., Nasseri, Y., Cohen, J., Ellenhorn, J. (2019). 'But His Yelp Reviews Are Awful!': Analysis of General Surgeons' Yelp Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), 6. doi:10.2196/11646 López, A., Detz, A., Ratanawongsa, N., Sarkar, U. (2012). What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(6), 685-692. Macdonald, M. E., Beaudin, A., Pineda, C. (2015). What do patients think about dental services in Quebec? Analysis of a dentist rating website. J Can Dent Assoc, 81, f3. McCartney, M. (2009). Will doctor rating sites improve the quality of care? No. Bmj, 338. McGrath, R. J., Priestley, J. L., Zhou, Y. Y., Culligan, P. J. (2018). The Validity of Online Patient Ratings of Physicians: Analysis of Physician Peer Reviews and Patient Ratings. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 7(1), 4. doi:10.2196/ijmr.9350 Oermann, M. H., Wilson, F. L. (2000). Quality of care information for consumers on the Internet. Journal of nursing care quality, 14(4), 45-54. Okike, K., Peter-Bibb, T. K., Xie, K. C., Okike, O. N. (2016). Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(12), 6. doi:10.2196/jmir.6612 Racherla, P., Friske, W. (2012). Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548-559. Ramkumar, P. N., Navarro, S. M., Chughtai, M., La, T., Fisch, E., Mont, M. A. (2017). The Patient Experience: An Analysis of Orthopedic Surgeon Quality on Physician-Rating Sites. Journal of Arthroplasty, 32(9), 2905-2910. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.053 Ranard, B. L., Werner, R. M., Antanavicius, T., Schwartz, H. A., Smith, R. J., Meisel, Z. F., . . . Merchant, R. M. (2016). Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care. Health Affairs, 35(4), 697-705. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030 Randhawa, S., Viqar, A., Strother, J., Prabhu, A. V., Xia, F., Heron, D., Beriwal, S. (2018). How do patients rate their radiation oncologists in the modern era: an analysis of Vitals. com. Cureus, 10(9). Rastegar-Mojarad, M., Ye, Z., Wall, D., Murali, N., Lin, S. (2015). Collecting and analyzing patient experiences of health care from social media. JMIR research protocols, 4(3), e78. Riiskjær, E., Ammentorp, J., Kofoed, P.-E. (2012). The value of open-ended questions in surveys on patient experience: number of comments and perceived usefulness from a hospital perspective. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 24(5), 509-516. Rozenblum, R., Bates, D. W. (2013). Patient-centred healthcare, social media and the internet: the perfect storm? In: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. Schlesinger, M., Grob, R., Shaller, D., Martino, S. C., Parker, A. M., Finucane, M. L., . . . Rybowski, L. (2015). Taking Patients' Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science. New England Journal of Medicine, 373(7), 675-679. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb1502361 Segal, J., Sacopulos, M., Sheets, V., Thurston, I., Brooks, K., Puccia, R. (2012). Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(2), e50. Smith, R. J., Lipoff, J. B. (2016). Evaluation of Dermatology Practice Online Reviews Lessons From Qualitative Analysis. Jama Dermatology, 152(2), 153-157. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3950 Strech, D. (2011). Ethical principles for physician rating sites. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e113. Terlutter, R., Bidmon, S., Rottl, J. (2014). Who Uses Physician-Rating Websites? Differences in Sociodemographic Variables, Psychographic Variables, and Health Status of Users and Nonusers of Physician-Rating Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(3), 227-237. doi:10.2196/jmir.3145 Thackeray, R., Crookston, B. T., West, J. H. (2013). Correlates of Health-Related Social Media Use Among Adults. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(1), 12. doi:10.2196/jmir.2297 Tsianakas, V., Maben, J., Wiseman, T., Robert, G., Richardson, A., Madden, P., . . . Davies, E. A. (2012). Using patients’ experiences to identify priorities for quality improvement in breast cancer care: patient narratives, surveys or both? Bmc Health Services Research, 12(1), 271. van Velthoven, M. H., Atherton, H., Powell, J. (2018). A cross sectional survey of the UK public to understand use of online ratings and reviews of health services. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(9), 1690-1696. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2018.04.001 Verhoef, L. M., Van de Belt, T. H., Engelen, L., Schoonhoven, L., Kool, R. B. (2014). Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(2), 11. doi:10.2196/jmir.3024 Willis, C. D., Evans, S. M., Stoelwinder, J. U., Cameron, P. A. (2007). Measuring quality. Australian Health Review, 31(2), 276-281. Yaraghi, N., Wang, W. G., Gao, G. D., Agarwal, R. (2018). How Online Quality Ratings Influence Patients' Choice of Medical Providers: Controlled Experimental Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(3), 12. doi:10.2196/jmir.8986 Zhang, W., Deng, Z., Hong, Z., Evans, R., Ma, J., Zhang, H. (2018). Unhappy patients are not alike: content analysis of the negative comments from China's good doctor website. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(1), e35. 全民健康保險醫療品質資訊公開網. (2018). 西醫基層總額指標. Retrieved from https://www1.nhi.gov.tw/AmountInfoWeb/TargetItem.aspx?rtype=1 行政院衛生署中央健康保險局. (2002). 全民健康保險監理委員會委員會議101年度10月份專案報告資料. Retrieved from https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-3142-b3af0354-0c98-48f5-b7e2-6f97b81956da.html 郭年真, 鍾國彪, 賴美淑. (2015). 醫院品質報告卡之風險校正. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 34(6), 576-591. 衛生福利部. (2008). 行政院衛生署「全民健康保險醫療品質資訊公開網」正式啟用了！. Retrieved from https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-3163-28545-1.html 衛生福利部中央健康保險署. (2020). 蘋果公司公布臺灣2020年度熱門APP排行榜，本署「全民健保行動快易通｜健康存摺」勇奪APP下載排行冠軍. Retrieved from https://www.nhi.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=FC05EB85BD57C709 s=3588080DED1457A2 衛生福利部全民健康保險爭議審議會. (2016). 全民健康保險醫療品質資訊公開網的新模式. Retrieved from https://service.mohw.gov.tw/MOHW_Upload/dmc_history/UpFile/Period34/全民健康保險 醫療品質資訊公開的新模式.pdf 衛生福利部全民健康保險會. (2016, May 18, 2017). 衛福部健保會第2屆105年8次委員會議議事錄. 全民健康保險醫療品質資訊公開辦法第二條附表一及附表二修正草案總說明. Retrieved from https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Resource/bulletin/6583_1050036384-1.pdf 衛生福利部統計處. (2019). 醫療機構現況及醫院醫療服務量統計(pp. 8). Retrieved from https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-4487-49166-113.html 鍾國彪, 游宗憲. (2009). 醫療品質指標發展的挑戰與展望: 我們還能做什麼? 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 28(5), 345-360. 魏玉容, 鍾國彪, 鄭守夏. (2005). 醫療品質評估的發展-從專業評鑑到報告卡 系統. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 24(4), 275-283 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67216 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 研究背景：近年來，越來越多病患於社群媒體或是醫師及醫療機構的評價網站上分享自己的就醫經驗以及對於醫師、醫院的看法，隨著醫療界對於以病患為中心的醫療照護品質越趨重視，病患滿意度也被看作醫療品質指標之一，病患於網路上留下的回饋也成為了促進提升醫療品質的參考工具。然而，醫院的醫療品質有著評鑑把關，診所卻沒有一定的品質指標結果可供民眾參考，目前現有政府公開的診所品質參考來源只有全民健康保險醫療品質公開網上的西醫基層指標，以及民眾在網路上查找他人的經驗分享能夠作為消費者進行醫療決策時的輔助。
研究目的：本研究意在了解病患於網路上留下的評分與西醫基層診所醫療品質是否存在關聯性。 研究方法：研究對象為全民健康保險醫療品質資訊公開網上的西醫基層指標以及Google地圖平台上診所獲得的評分，使用斯皮爾曼等級相關係數作為分析網路評價和基層診所醫療品質指標相關性的工具，同時採用複線性迴歸模型探討變項之間的線性關係以及採用羅吉斯迴歸分析探討不同變項與診所表現優劣之關聯性。 研究結果：在21項醫療品質指標之中，有8項指標與網路評分呈統計顯著的低度相關(ρ=−0.1~0.1, p-value<.05)，7項指標說明當評分增加時，醫療品質指標的表現也會更好；此外，在複迴歸模型中發現，在各個指標內所有呈統計顯著的項目之中，不同專科別(參數估計值: -0.04~17.76, p-value<.05)整體來說對於醫療品質指標表現的影響力較評分(參數估計值:-0.06~-0.89, p-value<.05)來得更大；從羅吉斯模型之中也能看出，專科別(OR: 0.05~18.15, p-value<.05)對於診所表現差異的影響力較評分(OR: 0.77~1.23, p-value<.05)來得更有鑑別程度。 結論：當民眾在網路上搜尋資訊以做出醫療決策時，網路上的評分能夠作為診所品質表現好壞的輔助資料，而政府在醫療品質資訊公開網上提供的資訊也有相等重要的參考價值，且由於網路評分和西醫基層指標所代表的醫療品質構面不同，因此民眾可將兩者作為尋求醫療提供者時互補的工具使用。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Social media and patient rating websites that post ratings and comments on patient experience are increasingly popular in recent years. Leading to a higher awareness of patient-centered care, patient satisfaction was seen as an indicator of the quality of care. Also, studies showed online ratings had become a popular tool to facilitate quality improvement. However, hospitals in Taiwan had implemented accreditation by an official organization, while local clinics don’t have a standard for assessing their quality performance to date. When it comes to choosing primary care providers, social media ratings may offer another opportunity for patients to identify clinic performance.
Objective: Little is known about the usefulness of consumer ratings when searching for a local clinic in Taiwan. Therefore, this study attempts to fill the knowledge gap by assessing the association between Google Maps ratings and quality measures of clinics, to know whether online ratings could steer patients to better performing clinics. Methods: Data were obtained from the national health insurance healthcare quality public reporting website, National Health Insurance Administration under the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan. Ratings(1-5 stars) from Google Maps were collected in April 2020. The association between ratings and quality measures of clinics is evaluated through spearman rank correlation coefficient analysis. Multivariate linear regression model and multivariate logistic regression models were performed for elaborating the association between clinic covariates and quality measures of clinics. Results: Among clinics with >10 Google Maps ratings, 8/21 quality measures were significantly associated with online ratings (ρ=−0.1~0.1, p<.05 for all). Thereof, seven associations indicated better online ratings for better quality performance. When compared with online ratings, multivariate linear regression model and multivariate logistic regression models showed specialties have significant impact on quality measures’ performances. Conclusion: These data suggest that consumers posting ratings on Google Maps may relate to quality measures of local clinics in Taiwan. However, the relatively weak strength as well as the lack of associations with several other quality measures may not draw strong conclusions. Since online ratings and quality measures of local clinics may represent different domains of quality of care, patients should use both data sources for guiding their choices of searching clinics. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:23:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0802202113533900.pdf: 2401396 bytes, checksum: 632c9b44228cce09e1144a395c4b1638 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I 致謝 II 摘要 III ABSTRACT V 表目錄 IX 圖目錄 I 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究重要性 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 醫療照護相關網路評價 6 第二節 醫療品質指標 9 第三節 網路評分和臨床品質指標的關聯性 10 第四節 網路評分和評論的特性與內容 32 第五節 小結 36 第三章 研究方法 37 第一節 研究設計與架構 37 第二節 研究假說 39 第三節 研究對象 39 第四節 資料來源與資料處理流程 39 第五節 研究變項與操作型定義 44 第六節 統計分析方法 51 第四章 研究結果 53 第一節 描述性統計 53 第二節 雙變量分析 61 第三節 多變量分析 77 第五章 討論 126 第一節 研究方法及工具之討論 126 第二節 研究結果之討論 128 第三節 研究限制 136 第六章 結論與建議 138 第一節 研究結論 138 第二節 研究建議 139 中文參考文獻 141 英文參考文獻 142 附錄 150 附錄一、依變項指標建立原因 150 附錄二、實際採用診所間數 152 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 照護品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社群媒體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 初級照護 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 病患評價網站 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Google地圖平台 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 醫療品質指標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網路評分 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Online ratings | en |
| dc.subject | primary care | en |
| dc.subject | quality of care | en |
| dc.subject | social media | en |
| dc.subject | Patient rating websites | en |
| dc.subject | Google Maps | en |
| dc.subject | clinic performance measures | en |
| dc.title | 基層診所社群網站評比與醫療品質指標的相關性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Associations between online ratings and quality measures of local clinics in Taiwan. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鍾國彪(Kuo-Piao Chung),廖熏香(Hsun-Hsiang Liao) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 網路評分,醫療品質指標,Google地圖平台,病患評價網站,社群媒體,照護品質,初級照護, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Online ratings,clinic performance measures,Google Maps,Patient rating websites,social media,quality of care,primary care, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 153 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100675 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-08 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0802202113533900.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。