請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67209完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Joanne Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張喬安 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:23:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-11 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-11 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王蕙雙，(2015)，基地綠化之景觀生態效益，碩士論文，國立台灣大學園藝學研究所，台北。
何彥慧，(2011)，不同景觀類型對受測者身心理反映影響之跨文化研究，碩士論文，國立台灣大學園藝學研究所，台北。 翁珮怡，(2003)，環境景觀生態結構對物種、使用者自然度感受及其生心理反應影響之研究，碩士論文，國立台灣大學園藝學研究所，台北。 翁珮怡、江彥政、張俊彥，(2010)，土地開發程度對自然度感受及生心理反應之影響，造園景觀學報，17(1)：41-60。 張高雯、張俊彥，(2000)，景觀生態結構與鳥類多樣性之相關研究，興大園藝，25(3):95-107。 黃孝璋，(2007)，景觀偏好、注意力恢復力及心理生理反應之相關性研究，碩士論文，國立台灣大學園藝學研究所，台北。 黃昱瑄，(2011)，都市環境中認知自然度之影響因子探討，碩士論文，國立台灣大學園藝學研究所，台北。 廖婉婷，(2012)，不同公園情境對自然度感受及偏好影響之研究，碩士論文，國立台灣大學園藝暨景觀學研究所，台北。 廖婉婷、鄭佳昆、林晏州，(2013)，不同地點標籤對自然度感受及偏好影響之研究. 戶外遊憩研究, 26(4), 31-56。 羅任遠，(2008)，兩群落 Beta 生物多樣性之統計分析，碩士論文，清華大學統計學研究所，新竹。 Alexandrino, E. R., Buechley, E. R., Karr, J. R., de Barros, K. M. P. M., de Barros Ferraz, S. F., do Couto, H. T. Z., & Şekercioğlu, Ç. H. (2016). Bird based Index of Biotic Integrity: Assessing the ecological condition of Atlantic Forest patches in human-modified landscape. Ecological Indicators. Akpinar, A. (2016). How is high school greenness related to students’ restoration and health? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16, 1-8. Appleton, J. (1975) The Experience of Landscape (London: Wiley). Assessment, M. E. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, DC. Bakhtiari, F., Jacobsen, J. B., Strange, N., & Helles, F. (2014). Revealing lay people’s perceptions of forest biodiversity value components and their application in valuation method. Global Ecology and Conservation, 1, 27-42. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(3), 249-259 Berto, R., Baroni, M. R., Zainaghi, A., & Bettella, S. (2010). An exploratory study of the effect of high and low fascination environments on attentional fatigue. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 494-500 Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41-50 Brown, C., & Grant, M. (2005). Biodiversity and human health: What role for nature in healthy urban planning? Built Environment, 31(4), 326-338. Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1990). Scaling of ratings: concepts and methods (Vol. 293). USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Buijs, A. E., Fischer, A., Rink, D., & Young, J. C. (2008). Looking beyond superficial knowledge gaps: understanding public representations of biodiversity. The International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, 4(2), 65-80. Carrus, G., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Dentamaro, I., Scopelliti, M., & Sanesi, G. (2013). Relations between naturalness and perceived restorativeness of different urban green spaces. Psyecology, 4(3), 227-244. Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Ferrini, F., Salbitano, F., ... & Sanesi, G. (2015). Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 221-228. Chiang, Y. C., Nasar, J. L., & Ko, C. C. (2014). Influence of visibility and situational threats on forest trail evaluations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 166-173. Cornelis, J., & Hermy, M. (2004). Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), 385-401 Dallimer, M., Irvine, K. N., Skinner, A. M., Davies, Z. G., Rouquette, J. R., Maltby, L. L., ... & Gaston, K. J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience, 62(1), 47-55. de Maçaneiro, J. P., Oliveira, L. Z., Eisenlohr, P. V., & Schorn, L. A. (2016). Paradox Between Species Diversity and Conservation: A Subtropical Atlantic Forest Reserve in Brazil Has Similar Tree Species Diversity to Unprotected Sites in the Same Region. Tropical Conservation Science, 9(4), 1940082916668011. Dean, J., van Dooren, K., & Weinstein, P. (2011). Does biodiversity improve mental health in urban settings? Medical hypotheses, 76(6), 877-880. Fleming, C. M., Manning, M., & Ambrey, C. L. (2016). Crime, greenspace and life satisfaction: An evaluation of the New Zealand experience. Landscape and Urban Planning, 149, 1-10. Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology letters, 3(4), 390-394 Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (1997). Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Institutet för bostadsforskning. Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14(4), 175-194. Heilig, G. K. (2012). World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Population Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section, New York. Herzog, T. R., & Kropscott, L. S. (2004). Legibility, mystery, and visual access as predictors of preference and perceived danger in forest settings without pathways. Environment and behavior, 36(5), 659-677. Herzog, T. R., Maguire, P., & Nebel, M. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 159-170. Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2011). The affective quality of human-natural environment relationships. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(3), 147470491100900314 Hodges, K. E. (2016). Enhancing student engagement and learning via the optional Biodiversity Challenge. Global Ecology and Conservation, 5, 100-107. James, W. (1984). Psychology, briefer course (Vol. 14). Harvard University Press Jiang, B., Larsen, L., Deal, B., & Sullivan, W. C. (2015). A dose–response curve describing the relationship between tree cover density and landscape preference. Landscape and Urban Planning, 139, 16-25. Kahn, P. H. (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children's affiliation with nature. Developmental review, 17(1), 1-61. Kaplan, D. (1989). An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of. Themes from kaplan, 481. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: a psychological perspective Cambridge University Press. New York Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and behavior, 19(1), 3-32. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of environmental psychology, 15(3), 169-182 Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1995). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press. Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2008). Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. John Wiley & Sons. Kuper, R. (2017). Evaluations of landscape preference, complexity, and coherence for designed digital landscape models. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 407-421. Lamb, R. J., & Purcell, A. T. (1990). Perception of naturalness in landscape and its relationship to vegetation structure. Landscape and Urban Planning,19(4), 333-352 Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 31-44 Lindemann-Matthies, P., Junge, X., & Matthies, D. (2010). The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biological Conservation, 143(1), 195-202. Liu, C., Whittaker, R. J., Ma, K., & Malcolm, J. R. (2007). Unifying and distinguishing diversity ordering methods for comparing communities. Population Ecology, 49(2), 89-100. Maclaurin, J., & Sterelny, K. (2008). What is biodiversity? University of Chicago Press. Marselle, M. R., Irvine, K. N., Lorenzo-Arribas, A., & Warber, S. L. (2016). Does perceived restorativeness mediate the effects of perceived biodiversity and perceived naturalness on emotional well-being following group walks in nature? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 217-232 Melo, A. S. (2008). What do we win'confounding'species richness and evenness in a diversity index? Biota Neotropica, 8(3), 0-0. Ode, Å., Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Messager, P., & Miller, D. (2009). Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of environmental management, 90(1), 375-383 Ortega-Álvarez, R., & MacGregor-Fors, I. (2009). Living in the big city: Effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90(3), 189-195. Pazhouhanfar, M., & Kamal, M. (2014). Effect of predictors of visual preference as characteristics of urban natural landscapes in increasing perceived restorative potential. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(1), 145-151. Peschardt, K. K., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2013). Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 26-39. Purcell, A. T., & Lamb, R. J. (1998). Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape and urban planning, 42(1), 57-66. Purcell, T., Peron, E., & Berto, R. (2001). Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environment and behavior, 33(1), 93-106 Qiu, L., Lindberg, S., & Nielsen, A. B. (2013). Is biodiversity attractive? On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 119, 136-146 Sreetheran, M., & Van Den Bosch, C. C. K. (2014). A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban green spaces–A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(1), 1-18. Syrbe, R. U., Michel, E., & Walz, U. (2013). Structural indicators for the assessment of biodiversity and their connection to the richness of avifauna. Ecological indicators, 31, 89-98 Tveit, M., Ode, Å., & Fry, G. (2006). Key concepts in a framework for analyzing visual landscape character. Landscape research, 31(3), 229-255. Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523–556. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of environmental psychology, 11(3), 201-230. United Nations, (1993). Multilateral Convention on Biological Diversity (with annexes). Concluded at Rio de Janeiro on 5 June 1992 United Nations – Treaty Series, 2016. http://www.cbd.int/convention/convention.shtml Van der Jagt, A. P., Craig, T., Anable, J., Brewer, M. J., & Pearson, D. G. (2014). Unearthing the picturesque: The validity of the preference matrix as a measure of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 124, 1-13. Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture Publ. Walz, U., & Syrbe, R. U. (2013). Linking landscape structure and biodiversity. Ecological indicators, 31(8), 1-5. Zube, E. H. (1984). Themes in landscape assessment theory. Landscape journal, 3(2), 104-110. Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape planning, 9(1), 1-33 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67209 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 由於都市化發展，人類與自然的交互作用逐漸增多，都市綠地日益成為生物多樣性發展的重要場所。生物多樣性是維持生態系統的重要因素，也是生態系統服務的基礎，影響了人類福祉(well-being)；而都市綠地除了生態功能外，亦在許多研究被指出了有助於人類的身心效益。因此本研究期盼運用分析自然環境對於人類知覺的影響，了解都市綠地是否能兼顧涵養生態與人類的心理效益的功能。透過探討景觀環境的生物多樣性與人類覺得該環境的自然程度之間的相關性，並研究知覺自然度不同的環境是否造成不同程度的景觀心理效益，分析景觀環境的生態的完整性是否對人類心理效益帶來影響。
本研究以鳥類作為生物多樣性的指標物種，調閱使用定時定量定點標準化調查方法的臺灣繁殖鳥大調查(Breeding Bird Survey Taiwan)鳥類調查資料，選定雙北市內30 組適宜樣點，計算其生物多樣性指數，以代表環境景觀的自然程度，並使用知覺自然度問項、景觀偏好問項與恢復性知覺量表(PRS)請受測者為實驗樣點的現地環境照片進行知覺層面的評分，以探討景觀環境的生物多樣性對於人類知覺自然度、景觀偏好與景觀注意力恢復力之間的關係。 研究結果發現景觀環境的物種多樣性對人類的知覺自然度具有正向相關，景觀環境的知覺自然度亦與景觀偏好及景觀的注意力恢復力呈現顯著相關，而知覺自然度在景觀環境的物種多樣性對人類的景觀偏好與注意力恢復力的相關性中具有中介性。研究結果顯示景觀環境的物種多樣性會部份透過人們對於該環境的知覺自然度，影響該景觀環境對人類的景觀偏好與注意力恢復能力，意即人們覺得較自然、物種多樣性較高的環境，對於人類較能產生良好的心理效益。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Biodiversity is the base of ecosystem services and it also affects human well-being. Many studies have pointed out the impact of urban green space on people's physical and mental benefits, such as attention restoration theory (ART), which indicates that urban green space is one of the indispensable resources of mankind.
Due to the development of urbanization, the interaction between human and nature is increasing, and urban green space also become an important place for creatures. Therefore, the main idea of this research is to find out whether human-beings and nature species can both get environment benefits from urban green spaces, and whether the environment is related to the psychological benefits of human-beings. In this study, bird species was used as the species index. Participants were asked to answer a questionnaire about their preference, perceived naturalness and mental benefits of the environments after they saw the picture of the environment with bird survey. The result shows that the species diversity of the landscape environment is positively related to the perceived naturalness of human. The perceived naturalness of the landscape environment also has a significant correlation with the landscape preference and mental benefit, which means that the landscape is more restorative and preferred by human when the environment is with a higher species diversity. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:23:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R03628303-1.pdf: 12969140 bytes, checksum: a02cfb13ae1d3f52016d0d20e6c942f5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii 圖目錄 v 表目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究限制與研究範圍 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 生物多樣性 4 第二節 知覺自然度 8 第三節 景觀偏好理論 10 第四節 注意力恢復理論 15 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究變項 20 第二節 研究架構與假設 21 第三節 研究流程 23 第四節 研究設計 24 第五節 實驗操作與流程 38 第六節 資料收集與分析方法 43 第四章 研究結果 44 第一節 樣本特性分析 44 第二節 研究假設驗證 50 第五章 結論與建議 58 第一節 研究結果討論 58 第二節 總結 64 第三節 後續研究建議 65 參考文獻 69 附錄一 實驗樣點半徑100公尺空照圖 77 附錄二 實驗問卷(節錄) 87 附錄三 實驗投影片 89 附錄四 實驗樣點數據與坐標 92 附錄五 重要文獻原文摘錄 94 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 香農-韋納指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 知覺自然度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 注意力恢復力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 景觀偏好 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | PRS 量表 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Shannon - Wiener index | en |
| dc.subject | Perceived Naturalness | en |
| dc.subject | Attention Restoration | en |
| dc.subject | Landscape Preference | en |
| dc.subject | PRS scale | en |
| dc.title | 景觀環境生物多樣性對感知自然度、偏好與注意力恢復力之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Influences of Ecological Environment on Perceived Naturalness, Preference, and Attention Restoration | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林寶秀,林晏州,侯錦雄,歐聖榮 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 香農-韋納指數,知覺自然度,注意力恢復力,景觀偏好,PRS 量表, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Shannon - Wiener index,Perceived Naturalness,Attention Restoration,Landscape Preference,PRS scale, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 106 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201702855 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 12.67 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。