請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66957
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林子倫(Tze-Luen Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Wei Chuang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 莊志偉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:15:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
王悅、李立峰,2014,記者心中的角色模範及其影響初探:香港個案研究,新聞學研究,第一一九期:1-43 朱立,2014,權力夾縫中求存的香港新聞自由,新聞學研究:第一一八期:209-216 江明珠,2015,我們將因了解而分離?台灣記者派駐大陸後的認同轉變,台大政治研究所碩士論文 李立峯,2016,新聞媒體在社會運動中的 公眾屏幕功能和影響: 香港雨傘運動之「暗角事件」個案分析,《傳播與社會學刊》,(總)第38期:165–232 汪琪、蕭小穗,2014,〈本土傳播研究的下一步〉,《傳播與社會學刊》,(總) 第29期(2014) :1–15 余陽洲,1999,〈大眾傳播的控制〉,《傳播與社會》,台北市:楊志文化 79-113 何穎怡譯,1993,《探索新聞:美國報業社會史》,臺北市 : 遠流,譯自: Discovering the news : a social history of American newspaper 徐來、黃煜,2016,〈香港政治傳播研究的軌跡與前景〉,《傳播與社會學刊》,(總) 第36期:133–162 康照祥,2005,〈誰在控制媒體〉,《媒體識讀》,台北市:楊志文化 55-67 馬家豪、曾子琪,2015,〈網媒多數支持佔中和激進港獨力量;但在現實世界,反對港獨及溫和派卻是大多數,香港網媒是政治動員平台〉,《亞洲週刊》,22期,P33 張文強,2009,《新聞工作者與媒體組織的互動》,台北市:秀威資訊科技 張讚國,2016,〈 從定調到解釋性界限:占中運動、商業報紙與獨立媒體〉,《傳播研究與實踐》,第6卷第1期:45-77 張卿卿,2015,〈媒體新趨勢:形塑與映照〉,《傳播與社會學刊》,(總)第34期:v–vii 陳順孝,2003,《新聞控制與反控制:「紀實避禍」的報導策略》,台北市:五南 陳韜文、李 立峯,2009,〈香港的傳媒、政治與社會變遷〉,《國 際新聞界》 ,第182期:11–16 陳韜文、馬傑偉、蘇鑰機,1997,〈回到未來:香港大眾傳媒的回顧與前瞻〉,鄭宇碩 (編) ,《香港評論》:415–438香港:中文大學出版社。 翁秀琪,1998,《大眾傳播理論與實證》,台北市,三民 鄧力,2016,〈新聞教育如何塑造不一樣的未來記者: 中國大陸與香港新聞學生對記者角色認知的比較研究(2008–2014)〉,《傳播與社會學刊》,(總) 第36期:69–103 劉瀾昌,2008,《香港在一國兩制下的新聞生態》,台北市:秀威資訊科技 臧國仁,1999,《新聞媒體與消息來源:媒介框架與真實》,台北市:三民 鍾心怡,2014,新聞室控制型態與抗爭策略之個案研究─以公共電視《有話好說》為例,台大新聞研究所碩士論文 McQuail ,2013,《McQuail’s 大眾傳播理論》,韋伯 貳、英文部分 Bantz CR (1985) News organizations. Conflict as a crafted cultural norm. Communication 8: 225–244. Buonanno, M. (1993). News-values and fiction-values: news as serial devices and criteria of ‘fiction worthiness’ in Italian TV fiction. European Journal of Communication 8: 177-202. Breed, W. (1955), Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis, Social Forces, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 326-335 Cook T (1998) Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Daniel Hallin, ”The Passing of the ’High Modernism’ of American Journalism,” Journal of Communication 42 (3, 1992). Deuze M (2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology reconsidered. Journalism 6(4): 442–464. Deuze, M. (2007), Media Work, Polity Press, Cambridge. Elbot, E. (1992). The giants in our midst. Media Ethics Update, 4(2), 5-7. Francis L.F. Lee &Joseph Chan.2009. Organizational Production of Self-Censorship in the Hong Kong Media.1123-133 Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what's news. New York: Random House. Gans H (1980) Deciding What’s News. New York: Vintage Books. Gary Tang & Francis L. F. Lee .2014. Hong Kong journalists’ attitude towards social protests: A belief system perspective, Media Asia, 41:1, 55-70 Hallin D and Mancini P (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hanitzsch T, Anikina M, Berganza R, et al. (2010) Modeling perceived influences on journalism: Evidence from a cross-national survey of journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 87(1): 7–24. Hirsch, P. (1977). Occupational, organizational and institutional models in mass media research: Toward an integrated framework. In P. M. Hirsch, P. V Miller, & F. G. Kline (Eds.), Strategies for communication research (pp. 13-40). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Kovach B and Rosenstiel T (2001) The Elements of Journalism. New York: Crown. Lund AB, Willig I and Ørsten M (2009) Hvor kommer nyhederne fra? Den journalistiske fødekæde i Danmark før og nu [Where does the news come from? The journalistic food chain before and now]. Århus: Forlaget Ajour. Mark Deuze.2008. Understanding Journalism as Newswork: How It Changes, and How It Remains the Same 4-24 Michael Schudson, “The Sociology of News Production,” Media, Culture G. Society 11 (1989) Morten Skovsgaard.2014. Watchdogs on a leash? The impact of organisational constraints on journalists’ perceived professional autonomy and their relationship with superiors. 344 –363 Schlesinger P (1978) Putting ‘Reality’ Together. London: Methuen. Schulte, W. (2013), Newsroom Social Controls: An Ethnographic Study of the Modern News Worker, Policy, and Organizational Dynamics, Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium Communication in the Millennium, pdf. file, CD, pp.117-130. Shoemaker PJ(1991)Gatekeeping.newbury park,CA:Sage. Shoemaker PJ and Reese SD (1996) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influence on Mass Media Content. White Plains, NY: Longman. Sigal, L. V. (1973). Reporters and officials. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath. Sigelman L (1973) Reporting the news. An organizational analysis. American Journal of Sociology 79(1): 132–151. Soloski J (1989) News reporting and professionalism: Some constraints on the reporting of the news. Media, Culture and Society 11: 207–228. Stephen D. Reese & Jane Ballinger.2001.The roots of a sociology of news:Remembering Mr.Gats and social control in the newsroom. 641-658 Stephen D. Reese & Pamela J. Shoemaker .2016. A Media Sociology for the Networked Public Sphere: The Hierarchy of Influences Model , Mass Communication and Society, 19:4, 389-41 Stephen D. Reese & Pamela J. Shoemaker.1996. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. New York 139-172 Susan Currie Sivek.2010. Social Media Under Social Control: Regulating Social Media and the Future of Socialization. Electronic News 4(3) 146-164 Thornton, P. (2009). WSJ looks to the past for new social media policy. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://beatblogging.org/2009/05/14/wsj-looks-to-the-past-for-new-social-media-policy/ Tuchman, G. (1972), Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen’s Notions of Objectivity, The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 77, no. 4, pp.660-679. Tunstall, J. (1971). Journalists at work. London: Constable. Weinberger, D. (2009). Transparency is the new objectivity. Retrieved October 30, 2009, from http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/07/19/transparency-is-the-new-objectivity William Schulte.2014. Newsroom Resistance: An Ethnographic Study of the Modern News Worker, Policies, and Organizational Dissatisfaction 參、網路資料 立場新聞,2015,Newsroom的暗角-前言 https://thestandnews.com/media/newsroom%E7%9A%84%E6%9A%97%E8%A7%92-%E5%89%8D%E8%A8%80/ 立場新聞,2015,Newsroom的暗角-如何專業的自我審查 https://thestandnews.com/media/newsroom%E7%9A%84%E6%9A%97%E8%A7%92-%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%E5%B0%88%E6%A5%AD%E5%9C%B0%E8%87%AA%E6%88%91%E5%AF%A9%E6%9F%A5/ 立場新聞,2015,Newsroom的暗角-(Side A)十個無線有審查的理據 https://thestandnews.com/media/newsroom%E7%9A%84%E6%9A%97%E8%A7%92-sidea%E5%8D%81%E4%B8%80%E5%80%8B%E7%84%A1%E7%B6%AB%E6%9C%89%E5%AF%A9%E6%9F%A5%E7%9A%84%E7%90%86%E6%93%9A/ 立場新聞,2015,Newsroom的暗角-(Side B)十個無線無審查的理據 https://thestandnews.com/media/newsroom%E7%9A%84%E6%9A%97%E8%A7%92-sideb%E5%8D%81%E4%B8%80%E5%80%8B%E7%84%A1%E7%B6%AB%E7%84%A1%E5%AF%A9%E6%9F%A5%E7%9A%84%E7%90%86%E6%93%9A/ 阿波羅新聞網,2015,〈佔領運動後 無線新聞部大逃亡〉,阿波羅新聞網頁 http://tw.aboluowang.com/2015/0226/519682.html 獨立媒體網站,2014,記者是扼殺言論自由的兇手? http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1021229 梁德民,2014,社交網站不是社會運動的靈丹妙藥,香港電台網站 http://app3.rthk.hk/mediadigest/content.php?aid=1979 香港記協新聞自由指數調查 2015 https://www.hkupop.hku.hk/chinese/report/pressFreedomIndex2016/content/presentation.pdf 香港大學「市民對新聞自由滿意度調查」 https://www.hkupop.hku.hk/chinese/popexpress/press/sat_press_free/year/SPF_year_chart.html | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66957 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 2014年10月香港雨傘運動期間,當地無線電視台(TVB)新聞部28名記者及採訪主任,因為不滿當天「七警毆人案」獨家報導遭高層下令刪去關鍵旁白,聯名在Facebook發表公開信表達抗議;事後更傳出秋後算帳、涉事記者大規模離職,成為香港新聞業「自我審查」的指標事件。
本論文從「新聞室社會控制」之理論觀點,探討三個研究問題,分別是新聞室的社會控制在TVB新聞部中如何運作?以「影響守門人行為5層次」來看,公開信事件為何/如何發生?以及事件後的離職潮如何發生?對TVB帶來什麼影響?透過次級資料分析以及16名行動者與學者的深度訪談,進行探索。 研究結果發現,源自西方社會的「新聞室的社會控制」理論,無法完整描述受到北京政經壓力嚴重影響的香港新聞機構現況;香港群眾對其自我審查的指責、新聞室內世代差異、社交媒體近用與香港獨有的九七回歸等因素累加,更是最終導致社會控制瓦解的原因。一代新人換舊人之後,儘管表面上TVB新聞部仍能正常運作,但相對平庸的資淺記者,已經失去「監督政府」的新聞職能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | During Hong Kong’s October, 2014 Umbrella Movement, 28 journalists and their supervisor from the news department of the local TV station (TVB) was dissatisfied about the management’s order to remove the vital voice narrative of their exclusive reporting on the “assault of protesters by seven police officers”. The journalists issued a joint public statement to protest via Facebook. However there were reported reprisals and mass-resignation of journalists involved in this matter. This has become an landmark event for Hong Kong media’s “self censorship.”
In order to clarify the incident’s causes and impact, this thesis formulated three research topics: how did “Social Control in the Newsroom” work within TVB’s news department? Based on the “Communication Gatekeeping Theory”, why and how did the public statement incident take place? How did the mass-resignation after the incident take place and what was the impact on TVB? I will seek answers through the secondary data analysis and the in depth interviews of 16 participants and scholars. Research indicated that the West-originated theory of “Social Control in the Newsroom” couldn’t fully describe current situations of Hong Kong’s media, which has been severely impacted by Beijing’s political and economic pressure. The combined factors of Hong Kong public’s criticism toward their self-censorship, generation gap inside the newsroom, the use of social medias, and Hong Kong’s unique situation of the 1997 handover, are the ultimate causes of the disintegration of social control. While the TVB news department is still able to operate normally after the generation turnover, the relatively less-experienced and mediocre journalists have lost their journalistic roles of watchdog over the government. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:15:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-P04322028-1.pdf: 2962962 bytes, checksum: 00f157792579aa7886d510b1b07f4de1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究問題與研究設計 4 第四節 研究架構與章節安排 9 第二章 文獻回顧 13 第一節 「新聞室的社會控制」理論源起 14 第二節 「新聞室的社會控制」理論演進 17 第三節 記者如何應對「社會控制」 23 第四節 社交媒體興起 社會控制不再? 25 第五節 港台兩地的「新聞控制」 27 第六節 小結:守門人行為影響因素 30 第三章 「公開信」事件政經脈絡 35 第一節 近年香港「新聞自由」爭議事件 36 第二節 持續下滑的香港新聞自由 38 第三節 香港媒體的政治光譜 42 第四節 小結 45 第四章 TVB新聞室的社會控制 47 第一節 控制手段分析 47 第二節 TVB記者的迂迴手段 53 第三節 管理層變化對自我審查之影響 56 第四節 香港輿論對TVB之影響 59 第五節 雨傘運動時期的TVB「自我審查」 63 第六節 小結 70 第五章 公開信事件影響因素分析 75 第一節 重構TVB「公開信」事發原委 75 第二節 專業意理之影響 81 第三節 世代衝突之影響 86 第四節 九七回歸擴大新聞室世代差異 91 第五節 社交媒體增加管理新挑戰 94 第六節 公開信事件之影響 98 第七節 小結 103 第六章 結論 107 第一節 主要研究發現 107 第二節 研究限制與省思 113 參考文獻 115 壹、中文部分 115 貳、英文部分 117 參、網路資料 121 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 再探「新聞室的社會控制」 -以香港TVB為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Revisiting Socila control in newsroom:The Case of TVB in Hong Kong | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 彭懷恩,林照真 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 香港,新聞室的社會控制,雨傘運動,守門人行為,自我審查, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Social Control in Newsroom,Hong Kong,gatekeeping,Umbrella Movement,Self-Censorship, | en |
dc.relation.page | 122 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201702980 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.89 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。