請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66880完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 童涵浦 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yun-Ting Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃昀婷 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:10:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-01-21 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-01-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-01-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻
王子昌，2007，〈人民制憲權的行使與政局的穩定：對泰國政變頻發的法學思考〉，《暨南學報(哲學社會科學版》，3(3)：68-72。 王小麗，2006，〈泰國政治、社會文化制度的兩難選擇-分析危機後經濟持久不能復甦的原因〉，《社會發展研究》，22(2)：24-27。 朱振明，2012，《泰國獨特的君主立憲制國家》，香港：香港城市大學出版社。 何弘欣，2016，〈正當性之辯與階級之爭:泰國後塔信時期政治動盪原因探悉〉，《南開學報》，13(2)。 巫俊穎，2011，《東亞國家民主發展與鞏固前景：從公民政治價值觀分析》，台北：國立台灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士論文。 宋鎮照、洪鼎倫，2017，《泰國政治經濟與發展治理：皇室軍權、區域經濟與社會族群視角》，台北：五南出版社。 李冠和，2013，〈選舉式威權政體:選舉競爭度、穩定性與民主化〉，《政治科學論叢》，57:69-114。 李明勳，2016a，〈在風雨中匍匐前進－東協人權建制的發展、挑戰與前景〉，《東協瞭望》，13:17-21。 李明勳，2016b，《亞洲價值與人權規範社會化：從東協人權建制的發展與挑戰分析東南亞的人權政治》，台北：國立台灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士論文。 李明勳，2017，〈沒有能力還是沒有意願？從東協國家的人權實踐分析人權脫鉤的成因與挑戰〉，《國家發展研究》，17(1)：79-128。 李淑貞，2018，《武裝力量與社會:泰國民主轉型時期的軍文關係，1991-2006》，南投：國立暨南國際大學東南亞學系博士論文。 李淑貞，2018，〈泰國軍隊權力的合法基礎〉，《聯大學報》，31-60。 李瓊莉，2007，〈我國參與東協區域人權議題之可能途徑〉，《戰略安全研析》，25：44-47。 周世亮，2008，〈泰國政局中的政治三角:軍隊、技術官僚、公眾社會〉，《學術探討》，3：36-40。 周群英，2009，〈泰國立憲主義及其經濟功能〉，《焦作師範高等專科學校學報》，25(4)： 32-35。 周方冶，2011，〈政治轉型中的制度因素：泰國選舉制度改革研究〉，《南洋問題研究》，3:1-12。 周方冶，2011，《王權、威權、金權，泰國政治現代化進程》，大陸：社會科學文獻出版社。 林若雩，2016，〈東協共同體內外安全治理之困境－新區域主義的觀點〉，《淡江國際區域研究半年刊》，5(1)。 段復初，2014，〈中華民國民主劃下的文武關係：軍隊國家化的進程〉，《復興崗學報》，104：1-24。 洪陸訓，2002，《軍人與政治：亞非拉美國家的軍事政變》，台灣：時英出版社。 高奇琦，2010，〈泰國政黨模式的變遷與民主鞏固〉，《南洋問題研究》，2：16-22． 張子揚，2016，《東協成立政府間人權委員會之分析》，科技部整合型計畫。 張美君，2010，〈試析泰國政治動盪的週期性〉，《東南亞研究》。 張傳賢，2009，〈民主的脆弱性與鞏固：一個敗者同意的視角〉，《政治科學論叢》，42(42)：43-84。 許湘濤、吳彥然，《競爭性威權體制之初探》，1-22。 許勤偉，2018，《泰國軍文關係之研究(1992-2014年)》，台北：國防大學戰略暨國際事務研究所碩士論文。 郭俊麟，2008，〈東南亞區域整合經驗－東協模式的實踐與檢討〉，《台灣國際研究季刊》，4(1)：99-126。 陳佩修，1999，〈軍事政變的成因、結果與影響：泰國個案研究〉，《問題與研究》，39(1)：35-64。 陳佩修，2009，〈泰式民主的脆弱性－2006 年 919 軍事政變與泰國民主的逆轉〉，《台灣民主季刊》，6：73-106。 陳佩修，2009，《軍人與政治:泰國的軍事政變與政治變遷》，台北：中央研究院人社中心亞太區域研究專題中心。 陳尚懋，2019，〈2019 年泰國大選的政治分析〉。 陳鴻瑜，2015，《泰國史》，台灣：台灣商務。 焦佩、馬曉雯，2009，〈軍事政變和獨裁交替下的泰國民主化道路－泰國民主化的特徵與未來〉，《南洋問題研究》，137(1)：45-65。 景躍進，2017，〈選舉何以成為威權的修飾詞－選舉概念的重構及新政體分類〉，《探索與爭鳴》，22-32。 廖福特，2011，〈東南亞國協政府間人權委員會之研究－歷史、組織、職權〉，《台灣國際法季刊》，8(3)：113-178。 劉立之，2008，〈泰國2006年政變原因探析－以威權主義與民主主義的張力為視角〉，《中南大學學報(社會科學版)》，14(5):650-653。 龍晟，2011，〈泰式憲政初探〉，《廣西大學學報(哲學社會科學版)》，33(1)：83-87。 蕭文軒、顧長永，2014，〈當代泰國華人政治認同與角色變遷之研究〉，《逢甲人文社會學報》，28:115-156。 顏永銘，2014，〈快樂政變之後？泰國政治局勢的前景〉，《戰略安全研析》，112：5-11。 朴景恩、鄭煥昇，高毓婷譯，2017，《你所不知道的泰國：從歷史、社會、風俗與信仰透視泰國文化的美麗與哀愁》，台灣：麥浩斯出版社。 班傑明．札瓦基，揚芩雯譯，2019，《泰國:美國與中國間的角力戰場，在夾縫中求存的東南亞王國》，台灣：馬可孛羅出版社。 二、英文文獻 Andersen, David, Jørgen Møller, Lasse Lykke Rørbæk and Svend-Erik Skaaning. (2014). “State capacity and political regime stability”.Democratization. 21(7)：1305-1325. Aydogan, Abdullah. (2019). “Constitutional foundations of military coups”. Political Science Quarterly, 134(1). Bank Asian Development. (1999). “Governance in Thailand : Challenges , Issues and Prospects”. In http://www.asianlii.org/asia/other/ADBLPRes/1999/1.pdf Bader, Julia, Jörn Grävingholt and Antje Kästner. (2010). “Would autocracies promote autocracy? A political economy perspective on regime-type export in regional neighbourhoods”. Contemporary Politics, 16(1), 81-100. Baker, Chris. (2003). “An internal history of the communist party of Thailand”. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 33(4), 510-541. Baker, Chris. (2016). “The 2014 Thai Coup and Some Roots of Authoritarianism”. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 388-404. Bergin, Bob. (2016). “Defeating an Insurgency—The Thai Effort against the Communist Party of Thailand, 1965–ca. 1982”. Studies in Intelligence, 60(2), 25-36 Case, William F. (2001). “Thai Democracy, 2001. Out of Equilibrium”. Asian Survey, 41(3), 525-547. Chang, Eric C.C. and Wen Chin Wu. (2016). “Preferential Trade Agreements, Income Inequality, and Authoritarian Survival”. Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 281-294. Chachavalpongpun, Pavin. (2014). “The Politics of International Sanctions: The 2014 Coup in Thailand”. Journal of International Affairs, 68(1), 169. Chanlett-Avery, Emma, Ben Dolven and Will Mackey. (2018). “Thailand: Backgroung and U.S. Relations”.Congressional Research Service. Clemens, Major B. (2008). “U.S.-Thailand Relations: Analysis of U.S. Military Support to the Kingdom of Thailand”. University State Marine Corps. Chulanee, Thianthai. (2012). “Perception of Democracy among Thai Adolescents”.Occasional Paper Series. Chambers, Paul and Napisa Waitoolkiat. (2016). “The resilience of monarchised military in Thailand”. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3). 425-444. Dressel, Björn and Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. (2019). “Coloured Judgements? The Work of the Thai Constitutional Court, 1998-2016”. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(1), 1-23. De Beer, Patrice. (1978). “History and policy of the communist party of Thailand”. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 8(1), 143-157. Downs, George W. and Michael A. Jones (2002). “Reputation, Compliance, and International Law”. The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(S1), S95-S114 Dukalskis, Alexander and Christopher D. Raymond. (2018). “Failure of authoritarian learning: explaining Burma/Myanmar’s electoral system”. Democratization, 25(3), 545-563. Escribà-Folch, Abel and Joseph Wright. (2015). “Foreign Pressure and Autocratic Survival”. Oxforad University Press. Escribà-Folch, Abel and Joseph Wright. (2015). “Autocratic Regimes and their Collapse”. Oxforad University Press. Escribà-Folch, Abel. (2017). “Foreign direct investment and the risk of regime transition in autocracies”. Democratization, 24(1), 61-80. Englehart, Neil A. (2003). “Democracy and the Thai Middle Class: Globalization, Modernization, and Constitutional Change”. Asian Survey, 43(2), 253-279. Eng, Peter. (1997). “Thai Democracy：The People Speak”. The Washington Quarterly, 169-189. Fjelde, Hanne and Håvard Hegre. (2014).“Political Corruption and Institutional Stability”. St Comp Int Dev, 49:267-299. Caselli, Francesco and Andrea Tesei. (2015). “Resource Windfalls, Political Regimes, and Political Stability. ” Review of Economics and Statistics. Fails, Matthew D. and Marc C. DuBuis. (2015). “Resources, Rent Diversification, and the Collapse of Autocratic Regimes”. Political Research Quarterly, 4(68), 703-715. Frantz, Erica and Andrea Kendall-Taylor. (2017). “The Evolution of Autocracy: Why Authoritarianism Is Becoming More Formidable”. Survival Global Politics and Strategy, 5(59), 57-68. Frantz, Erica and Elizabeth A. Stein (2017). “Countering Coups: Leadership Succession Rules in Dictatorships”. Comparative Political Studies, 50(7), 935-962. Geddes, Barbara. (1999). “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?”. Annual Reviews of Political Science, 2:114-144. Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright and Erica Frantz. (2014). “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set”. American Political Science Association, 12(2). Ginsburg, Tom. (2006). “Locking in Democracy : Constitutions , Commitment , and International Law”. University of Chicago Law School, 707, 708-743. Handley, Paul M. (2006). The King Never Smiles. Yale University Press. Hathaway, Oona A. (2007). “Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?”. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(4), 588-621 Hewison, Kevin. (2007). “Constitutions, regimes and power in Thailand”. Democratization, 14(5), 928-945. Holbig, Heike. (2013). “Ideology after the end of ideology. China and the quest for autocratic legitimation”. Democratization, 20(1), 61-81. Hollyer, James R. and B. Peter Rosendorff. (2012). “Do Human Rights Agreements Prolong the Tenure of Autocratic Ratifiers? ”. International Law and Politics, 44(36), 791-811 H. O’Neil, Patrick. (2019). “Revolution from within: Institutional Analysis , Transitions from Authoritarianism, and the case of Hungary”. Cambridge University Press, 48(4), 579-603. Johannes, Gerschewski. (2013). “The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression and co-optation in autocratic regimes”. Democratization, 20(1), 13-38. Kendall-Taylor, Andrea and Erica Frantz. (2016). “When Dictators Die”. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 30. Kim, Nam Kyu and Alex M. Kroeger. (2018). “Regime and Leader Instability Under Two Forms of Military Rule”. Comparative Political Studies, 51(1), 3-37. Kongkirati, Prajak. (2019). “From Illiberal Democracy to Military Authoritar-ianism: Intra-Elite Struggle and Mass-Based Conflict in Deeply Polarized Thailand”. The Annals of the American Academy, 681. Kuhonta, Erik Martinez and Aim Sinpeng. (2014). “Democratic regression in thailand: The ambivalent role of civil society and political institutions”. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 36(3), 333-355. Lührmann, Anna and Staffan I. Lindberg. (2019). “A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?”. Democratization. Maisrikrod, Surin. (1999). “Changing forms of democracy in asia? Some observations on the Thai and Philippine constitutions”. Asian Studies Review, 23(3), 355-373. Maisrikrod, Surin. (2001). “Civil Society, Accountability, and Governance in Thailand: A Dim Case of Participatory Democracy”. Governance An International Journal Of Policy And Administration, 97-116. Maisrikrod, Surin. (2007). “Learning from the 19 September Coup: Advancing Thai-style Democracy”. Southeast Asian Affairs, 340-359. Maisrikrod, Surin and Kevin Hewison. (2019). “Thailand ' s 1996 election: A Cheer for Democracy?”, 69(1), 30-39. Marks, Tom. (1992). “Maoist Miscue: The Demise of the Communist Party of Thailand, 1965–1983”. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 3(2), 112-169 Mccargo, Duncan. (2018). “Thailand in 2017. Asian Survey”, 58(1), 181-187. Mihr, Anja. (2017). “Regime consolidation through transitional justice in Europe: The cases of Germany, Spain and Turkey.” International Journal of Transitional Justice, 11(1), 113-131. Mikami, Satoru and Takashi Inoguchi. (2008). “Legitimacy and effectiveness in Thailand, 2003-2007: Perceived quality of governance and its consequences on political beliefs”. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 8(3), 279-302 Moller, Jorgen and Svend-Erik Skaaning. (2017). “Autocracies, democracies , and the violation of civil liberties”. Democratization, 20(1), 82-106 National Strategy Secretariat Office. National Strategy 2018-2037(Summary). (2017). Newson, Adlai and Francesco Trebbi. (2018). “Authoritarian elites”. Canadian Journal of Economics, 51(4), 1088-1117. Phongpaichit, Pasuk, Nualnoi Treerat and Chris Baker. (2016). “Very distinguished alumni: Thai political networking”. Southeast Asian Studies, 5(1), 19-34 Powell, Jonathan, Christopher Faulkner, William Dean and Kyle Romano. (2018). “Give them toys? Military allocations and regime stability in transitional democracies”. Democratization, 25(7), 1153-1172. Ricks, Jacob I. (2018). “Agents, principals, or something in between? Bureaucrats and policy control in Thailand”. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18(3), 321-344. Samudavanjia, Chai-Anan. (1986).“Political Institutionalization in Thailand: Continuity and Change”. Institute of East Asian Studies, 241-261. Samudavanija, Chai-Anan. (1987). “Democracy in Thailand: A Case of a Stable Semi-democratic Regime”. World Affairs, 150(1), 31-41. Schneider, Carsten Q, Maerz Seraphine F and Maerz S F. (2017). “Legitimation, cooptation, and repression and the survival of electoral autocracies”. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politik wissenschaft. 11:213-235. Surin, Maisrikrod. (1993). “Emerging patterns of political leadership in Thailand”, Contemporary Southeast Asia. 15(1)：80-97 Oxford Analytica Daily Brief. Service. (2016). “Thailand : King ' s death to slow economy and delay polls”. Thai Health. (2017). The 20-Year National Strategic Plan., 110-113. Von Soest, Christian and Grauvogel Julia. (2017). “Identity, procedures and performance: how authoritarian regimes legitimize their rule”. Contemporary Politics, 23(3), 287-305. Winichakul, Thongchai, (2007). “Toppling democracy”. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1(38), 11-37. Way, Lucan A. and Steven Levitsky. (2006). “The dynamics of autocratic coercion after the Cold War”. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(3), 387-410. Wike, Richard and Russ Oates. (2015). “Discontent with Politics Common in Many Emerging and Developing Nations”. Pew Research Center. Wong, Mathew Y.H. (2019). “Chinese influence, U.S. linkages, or neither? Comparing regime changes in Myanmar and Thailand”. Democratization, 26(3), 359-381. Wright, Joseph and Erica Frantz. (2017). “How oil income and missing hydrocarbon rents data influence autocratic survival: A response to Lucas and Richter (2016)”. Research and Politics, 4(3). Wright, Joseph, Erica Frantz and Barbara Geddes. (2013). “Oil and Autocratic Regime Survival”. Cambridge University Press, 45, 287-306. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66880 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 回顧泰國自1932年實施君主立憲至今的政治史可以發現，泰國政治長期都由軍人所控制，軍隊發動政變干預政治更塑造泰國獨特的惡性循環，而最近一次的政變則發生於2014年5月22日，然而軍方這回在從文人政府手中奪取執政權後，並未立即舉行國會大選，而是帶領泰國進入長達五年的軍隊威權統治，直到2019年3月24日才正式舉行選舉，在軍政府統治期間，泰國也在2016年10月面臨九世皇蒲美蓬的逝世。
文人政府、軍隊及泰王一直是影響泰國政局的主要行為者，本文將先從三大行為者的特徵及權力變化來介紹泰國政治史，闡述長期領導泰國政治的軍隊其政權正當性來源，最後以2014年政變至2019年國會大選為主要觀察期，探討2014年政變後，以帕拉育為首的軍政府是如何透過新憲法、選舉制度等其他制度變革，重新樹立軍隊的政治權力，使得軍政府最終得以民主選舉為外衣，成功轉型並延續執政權。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The Military intervention in 1932 has transformed the system of government in Thailand from an absolute monarchy into a constitutional monarch, but resulted in the vicious cycle of Thai politics between military dictatorship and civil government. On the evening of 22 May 2014, General Prayut launched a coup d'état against the civil government and seized the control of the government. However, the military government didn’t hold the election after the coup but instead repeatedly delayed the election date, and finally, won the election in 2019.
To explore the authoritarian transition and legitimacy of Thai military rule, I will demonstrate this paper into three parts. In the first part, I will clarify the characteristics of three influencial actors, the military, the civil government, and the king, and explain the power transitions among them. In the second part of this paper, I will focus on the military governments and sequentially explain how the military government resorts to political legitimacy. And in the last part of this paper, I will explore how the military authoritarian government in Thailand transforms and successfully strengthens its governance through institutionalization. Though the result of Thailand 2019 general election gives the military government a strong support, the 2017 Constitution and the rule of military general still put Thai democracy into an uncertain future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:10:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R06322029-1.pdf: 2640425 bytes, checksum: f4e6cc35334f475d04bb71a6bfec8383 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 文獻回顧 2 第三節 研究問題 10 第四節 研究方法與限制 15 第五節 章節安排 17 第貳章 泰國政治的三大行為者 19 第一節 泰國軍隊的特徵 20 第二節 皇室的特徵 29 第三節 文人政府的特徵 34 第四節 小結：三角關係的權力不對等 40 第參章 泰國軍事政權正當性 43 第一節 君主立憲後至冷戰期間 43 第二節 冷戰後至2014年政變 53 第三節 小結：軍事政權正當性的弱化與轉型 66 第肆章 泰國軍方的民主藍圖 70 第一節 軍政府的制度改革 71 第二節 2019年國會大選 76 第三節 小結：泰國的民主藍圖 83 第伍章 結論 95 參考文獻 98 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 威權政體轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 威權政體延續 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 軍隊政權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 正當性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | THAILAND MILITARY REGIME | en |
| dc.subject | AUTHORITARIAN TRANSITION | en |
| dc.subject | REGIME LEGITIMACY | en |
| dc.title | 泰國軍事政權的威權轉型與正當性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Authoritarian Transition and Legitimacy of the Military Regime in Thailand | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳親恩,黃凱苹 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 軍隊政權,威權政體轉型,威權政體延續,正當性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | THAILAND MILITARY REGIME,AUTHORITARIAN TRANSITION,REGIME LEGITIMACY, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 107 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000145 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-01-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-109-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.58 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。