請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66711
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 湯明哲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-Yun Cheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄭鈞云 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:52:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-01-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-10-21 | |
dc.identifier.citation | REFERENCES
Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. 1993. Institutional and Competitive Bandwagons: Using Mathematical Modeling as a Tool to Explore Innovation Diffusion. The Academy of Management Review, 18(3): 487-517. Achrol, R. S., & Stern, L. W. 1988. Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1): 36-50. Admati, A., & Pfleiderer, P. 1994. Robust financial contracting and the role of venture capitalists. Journal of Finance, 49(2): 371-402. Akerlof, G. A. 1970. The market for' lemons': Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3): 488-500. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. 2001. How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. The Academy of Management Executive (1993), 15(1): 139-148. Amburgey, T. L., & Miner, A. S. 1992. Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 335-348. Amit, R., Brander, J., & Zott, C. 1998. Why do venture capital firms exist? Theory and Canadian evidence. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(6): 441-466. Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E. 1990. Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing. Management Science, 36(10): 1232-1245. Anton, J. J., & Yao, D. A. 1994. Expropriation and inventions: Appropriable rents in the absence of property rights. The American Economic Review, 84(1): 190-209. Anton, J. J., & Yao, D. A. 2002. The sale of ideas: Strategic disclosure, property rights, and contracting. Review of Economic Studies, 69(3): 513-531. 74 Arthurs, J. D., & Busenitz, L. W. 2003. The Boundaries and Limitations of Agency Theory and Stewardship Theory in the Venture Capitalist/Entrepreneur Relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2): 145-162. Arthurs, J. D., Hoskisson, R. E., Busenitz, L. W., & Johnson, R. A. 2008. Managerial agents watching other agents: Multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. The Academy of Management Journal (AMJ), 51(2): 277-294. Baker, W. E. 1990. Market networks and corporate behavior. The American Journal of Sociology, 96(3): 589-625. Banerjee, A. V. 1992. A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3): 797-817. Baum, J. A. C., Rowley, T. J., Shipilov, A. V., & Chuang, Y. T. 2005. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4): 536-575. Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J. 2004. Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection. Organization Science, 15(3): 259-275. Bergemann, D., & Hege, U. 1998. Venture capital financing, moral hazard, and learning. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6-8): 703-735. Bhattacharya, S., & Ritter, J. R. 1983. Innovation and communication: Signalling with partial disclosure. The Review of Economic Studies, 50(2): 331. Birkinshaw, J., van Basten Batenburg, R., & Murray, G. 2002. Corporate venturing: The state of the art and the prospects for the future. London: London Business School. Blau, P. M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: Free Press. Block, Z., & Ornati, O. A. 1987. Compensating corporate venture managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1): 41-51. 75 Blumer, H. 1969. Fashion: From class differentiation to collective selection. Sociological Quarterly, 10(3): 275-291. Bohren, O. 1998. The Agent'ss Ethics in the Principal-Agent Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(7): 745-755. Brander, J. A., Amit, R., & Antweiler, W. 2002. Venture-Capital Syndication: Improved Venture Selection vs. The Value-Added Hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11(3): 423 - 452. Braunerhjelm, P., & Parker, S. C. 2010. Josh Lerner: recipient of the 2010 Global Award for Entrepreneurship Research. Small Business Economics. Bruton, G. D., Filatotchev, I., Chahine, S., & Wright, M. 2010. Governance, ownership structure, and performance of IPO firms: the impact of different types of private equity investors and institutional environments. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5): 491-509. Burt, R. S. 1983. Corporate profits and cooptation: Networks of market constraints and directorate ties in the American economy: Academic Press. Bygrave, W. D. 1987. Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2): 139-154 Bygrave, W. D. 1988. The structure of the investment networks of venture capital firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2): 137-157. Bygrave, W. D., & Timmons, J. A. 1992. Venture capital at the crossroads: Harvard Business Press. Chan, Y. S. 1983. On the positive role of financial intermediation in allocation of venture capital in a market with imperfect information. The Journal of Finance, 38(5): 1543-1568. 76 Coff, R. W. 1999. How buyers cope with uncertainty when acquiring firms in knowledge-intensive industries: caveat emptor. Organization Science: 144-161. Das, S., Sen, P. K., & Sengupta, S. 1998. Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 27-41. Das, T., & Teng, B. 2000. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1): 31-61. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. 1998. Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 491-512. De Ciercq, D., Fried, V. H., Lehtonen, O., & Sapienza, H. J. 2006. An Entrepreneur's Guide to the Venture Capital Galaxy. The Academy of Management Perspectives ARCHIVE, 20(3): 90-112. De Clercq, D., & Dimov, D. 2008. Internal Knowledge Development and External Knowledge Access in Venture Capital Investment Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3): 585-612. De Clercq, D., Sapienza, H. J., & Zaheer, A. 2008. Firm and Group Influences on Venture Capital Firms’ Involvement in New Ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7): 1169-1194. Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. 2000. Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 25(3): 650-669. Dimov, D., & Milanov, H. 2010. The interplay of need and opportunity in venture capital investment syndication. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(4): 331-348. Douma, S., George, R., Kabir, R., & Research, C. f. E. 2006. Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: Evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7): 637. 77 Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. 1998. Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering: Harvard Business Press. Dushnitsky, G., & Lavie, D. 2010. How alliance formation shapes corporate venture capital investment in the software industry: a resource-based perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(1): 22-48. Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. 2006. When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6): 753-772. Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. 2005. When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10): 947-965. Dushnitsky, G., & Shapira, Z. 2010. Entrepreneurial finance meets organizational reality: comparing investment practices and performance of corporate and independent venture capitalists. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9): 990-1017. Dushnitsky, G., & Shaver, J. M. 2009. Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: the paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10): 1045 - 1064. Dyer, J. 1997. Effective interfirm collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 535–556. Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. 2003. The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science: 57-68. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74. Fama, E. 1991. Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance, 46(5): 1575-1617. Ferrary, M. 2010. Syndication of Venture Capital Investment: The Art of Resource Pooling. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5): 885-907. 78 Fitza, M., Matusik, S. F., & Mosakowski, E. 2009. Do VCs matter? the importance of owners on performance variance in start-up firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 387-404. Geringer, J. M. 1991. Strategic Determinants of Partner Selection Criteria in International Joint Ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1): 41-62. Gompers, P. 1995a. Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. Journal of Finance, 50(5): 1461-1489. Gompers, P., Kovner, A., & Lerner, J. 2009. Specialization and Success: Evidence from Venture Capital Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3): 817 - 844. Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. 1999. An analysis of compensation in the US venture capital partnership. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(1): 3-44. Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. 2000. Money chasing deals? The impact of fund inflows on private equity valuation. Journal of Financial Economics, 55(2): 281-325. Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. 2001. The Venture Capital Revolution. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2): 145-168. Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. 2004. The venture capital cycle: The MIT Press. Gompers, P. A. 1995b. Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. The Journal of Finance, 50(5): 1461-1489. Gorman, M., & Sahlman, W. A. 1989. What do venture capitalists do? Journal of Business Venturing, 4(4): 231-248. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Granovetter, M. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, 25: 56. Gulati, R. 1995. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4): 619-652. 79 Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 293-317. Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Singh, H. 2009. The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11): 1213-1233. Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. 2007. Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 32-69. Gupta, A. K., & Sapienza, H. J. 1992. Determinants of venture capital firms' preferences regarding the industry diversity and geographic scope of their investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5): 347-362. Harrison, J., Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., & Ireland, R. 1991. Synergies and post-acquisition performance: Differences versus similarities in resource allocations. Journal of Management, 17(1): 173. Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. 2001. Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of Management, 27(6): 679. Haunschild, P. R. 1994. How much is that company worth?: Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty, and acquisition premiums. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3): 391-411. Haythornthwaite, C. 1996. Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & Information Science Research, 18(4): 323-342. Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society: 153-161. 80 Hellmann, T. 1998. The allocation of control rights in venture capital contracts. The Rand Journal of Economics, 29(1): 57-76. Henderson, J., & Leleux, B. 2002. Corporate venture capital: Effecting resource combinations and transfers. Babson Entrepreneurial Review, 2: 31¡V46. Hennart, J. F. 1988. A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4): 361-374. Hill, S. A., Maula, M. V. J., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Murray, G. C. 2009. Transferability of the venture capital model to the corporate context: Implications for the performance of corporate venture units. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(1): 3-27. Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J.-L., & Borza, A. 2000. Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 449-467. Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F. T. 2005. The Effect of General and Partner-Specific Alliance Experience on Joint R&D Project Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(2): 332-345. Hochberg, Y., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. 2007. Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. The Journal of Finance, 62(1): 251-301. Ibarra, H. 1992. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3): 422-447. Jaaskelainen, M., Maula, M., & Seppa, T. 2006. Allocation of attention to portfolio companies and the performance of venture capital firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2): 185-206. Jain, B. A. 2001. Predictors of performance of venture capitalist-backed organizations. Journal of Business Research, 52(3): 223-233. 81 Jensen, M. C. 1983. Organization theory and methodology. The accounting review, 58(2): 319-339. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360. Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. 2002. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8): 747-767. Kandel, E., & Lazear, E. P. 1992. Peer pressure and partnerships. The Journal of Political Economy, 100(4): 801-817. Keil, T., Maula, M. V. J., & Wilson, C. 2010. Unique Resources of Corporate Venture Capitalists as a Key to Entry Into Rigid Venture Capital Syndication Networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1): 83-103. Kogut, B. 1989. The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(2): 183-198. Kono, C., Palmer, D., Friedland, R., & Zafonte, M. 1998. Lost in space: The geography of corporate interlocking directorates. American journal of sociology: 863-911. Koot, W. T. M. (Ed.). 1998. Underlying dilemmas in the management of international joint ventures. Lexington, MA: Lexington books. Krugman, P. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3): 483-499. Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. 1999. Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science: 1-26. 82 Lavie, D. 2006. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. The Academy of Management Review ARCHIVE, 31(3): 638-658. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. 1954. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and control in modern society, 18: 18-66. Lerner, J. 1994a. The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management, 23(3): 16-27. Lerner, J. 1994b. Venture capitalists and the decision to go public. Journal of Financial Economics, 35(3): 293-316. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95-95. Levy, H., & Lazarovich-Porat, E. 1995. Signaling theory and risk perception: An experimental study. Journal of Economics and Business, 47(1): 39-56. Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M., & Ireland, R. 2008. Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. The Academy of Management Journal (AMJ), 51(2): 315-334. Li, S. X., & Rowley, T. J. 2002. Inertia and Evaluation Mechanisms in Interorganizational Partner Selection: Syndicate Formation among U.S. Investment Banks. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1104-1119. Lin, Z., Haibin, Y., & Demirkan, I. 2007. The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing. Management Science, 53(10): 1645-1658. Lin, Z., Yang, H., & Arya, B. 2009. Alliance partners and firm performance: resource complementarity and status association. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9): 921-940. 83 Lloyd, P. E., & Mason, C. M. 1984. Spatial variations in new firm formation in the United Kingdom: comparative evidence from Merseyside, Greater Manchester and South Hampshire. Regional Studies, 18(3): 207-220. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. 1999. The syndication of private equity: evidence from the UK. Venture Capital, 1(4): 303-324. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. 2001. The syndication of venture capital investments. Omega, 29(5): 375-390. MacMillan, I. C., & Kulow Roubina, D. M. 1989. Venture capitalists' involvement in their investments: Extent and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(1): 27-47. Madhok, A., & Tallman, S. B. 1998. Resources, transactions and rents: managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organization Science: 326-339. Malecki, E. J. 1997. Entrepreneurs, networks, and economic development: A review of recent research. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 3: 57-118. March, J. G. 1988. Variable risk preferences and adaptive aspirations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 9(1): 5-24. March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87. Markusen, A. R., Hall, P., & Glasmeier, A. 1986. High Tech America: The what, how, where, and why of the sunrise industries: Allen & Unwin. Masten, S. E. 1993. Transaction costs, mistakes, and performance: Assessing the importance of governance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(2): 119-129. Maula, M., Autio, E., & Murray, G. 2005. Corporate Venture Capitalists and Independent Venture Capitalists: What do they know, Who do They Know and Should 84 Entrepreneurs Care? Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 7(1): 3-21. McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science: 91-103. McNally, K. 1997. Corporate venture capital: bridging the equity gap in the small business sector. London, UK.: Routledge. McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. 1987. Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American sociological review, 52(3): 370-379. Meuleman, M., Lockett, A., Manigart, S., & Wright, M. 2010. Partner Selection Decisions in Interfirm Collaborations: The Paradox of Relational Embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6): 995-1019. Moorman, C., & Slotegraaf, R. J. 1999. The contingency value of complementary capabilities in product development. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2): 239-257. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change: Belknap press. Norton, E., & Tenenbaum, B. H. 1993. Specialization versus diversification as a venture capital investment strategy. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(5): 431-442. Osborn, R. N., & Hagedoorn, J. 1997. The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of interorganizational alliances and networks. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(2): 261-278. Park, S. H., & Russo, M. V. 1996. When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure. Management Science: 875-890. 85 Pauly, M. V. 1974. Overinsurance and public provision of insurance: the roles of moral hazard and adverse selection. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(1): 44. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (Eds.). 1978. The external control of organizations. Pisano, G. P. 1991. The governance of innovation: Vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry. Research Policy, 20(3): 237-249. Podolny, J. M. 1994. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3): 458-483. Podolny, Joel M. 2001. Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market. The American Journal of Sociology, 107(1): 33-60. Podolny, J. M. 2008. Status signals: A sociological study of market competition: Princeton Univ Pr. Powell, W. 1990. Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. Research in organizational behavior, 12: 295-336. Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. 1976. Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4): 629-649. Sahlman, W. A. 1990. The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2): 473-521. Sapienza, H. J. 1992. When do venture capitalists add value? Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1): 9-27. Sapienza, H. J., & Gupta, A. K. 1994. Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalist-CEO interaction. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(6): 1618-1632. Sapienza, H. J., Manigart, S., & Vermeir, W. 1996. Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(6): 439-469. 86 Sarkar, M. B., Echambadi, R. A. J., & Harrison, J. S. 2001. Alliance entrepreneurship and firm market performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7): 701-711. Schildt, H. A., Maula, M. V. J., & Keil, T. 2005. Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4): 493-515. Scott, A. J. 1982. Locational patterns and dynamics of industrial activity in the modern metropolis. Urban Studies, 19(2): 111. Shah, R. H., & Swaminathan, V. 2008. Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: the moderating role of alliance context. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5): 471-494. Siegel, R., Siegel, E., & MacMillan, I. C. 1988. Corporate venture capitalists: Autonomy, obstacles, and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(3): 233-247. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. 2001. Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments. The American Journal of Sociology, 106(6): 1546-1588. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. 2008. Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 266–294. Spence, M. 1973. Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3): 355. Strang, D., & Macy, M. W. 2001. In Search of Excellence: Fads, Success Stories, and Adaptive Emulation. American journal of sociology, 107(1): 147-182. Stuart, T. E. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3): 668-698. 87 Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1): 21-38. Sweeney, G. P., & Patrick, G. 1987. Innovation, entrepreneurs, and regional development: St. Martin's Press. Sykes, H. B. 1990. Corporate venture capital: Strategies for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1): 37-47. Teece, D. J. 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation:: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(1): 1-25. Thompson, J. D. (Ed.). 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American sociological review, 61(4): 674-698. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35-67. Verwaal, E., Bruining, H., Wright, M., Manigart, S., & Lockett, A. 2008. Resources access needs and capabilities as mediators of the relationship between VC firm size and syndication. Small Business Economics, 34(3): 277-291. Wadhwa, A., & Kotha, S. 2006. Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 819. Williamson, O. E. (Ed.). 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press. Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 1998. A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. The Academy of Management Review, 23(1): 133-153. 88 Wright, M. 1998. Venture capital and private equity: a review and synthesis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 25(5&6): 521-570. Wright, M., & Lockett, A. 2003. The Structure and Management of Alliances: Syndication in the Venture Capital Industry. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8): 2073-2102. Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal¡Vprincipal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196-220. Zenger, T. R. 1994. Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Management Science, 40(6): 708-729. Zipf, G. K. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66711 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 創業投資資金對於高不確定性新創事業提供融資。而新創企業不像公開上市公司有
公開資訊可供參考。為了獲得創投基金的投資,創業者對他們的事業擁有私有資訊但誇 大未來的獲利,此不確定性導致資訊不對稱與代理問題。創投產業存在的理由之一即為 降低創業者與投資者之間的資訊不對稱與代理成本。傳統代理理論已被採用在解釋代理 人(創業者)對於委託人(創投)的有害行為。而本研究的動機來自聯合投資網絡的存在與 創投投資過程中參與的多方,作法為延伸傳統的委託代理分析至多方委託代理架構去理 解創投投資的組織行為與其績效表現。 本研究以創投所面對的地理與產業構面的空間不確定性開始,來解釋當地理與產業 不確定存在時,降低資訊不對稱的困難。利用美國創業投資從1980 到2008 年的投資資 料庫,本研究發現地理與產業不確定存在對於投資績效有負向影響。本研究進而發展多 方委託代理架構來分析創業投資中,決定獨立創投(IVCs)與公司創投(CVCs)夥伴選擇策 略與其績效,牽涉的合作與協調所產生的目標與行動的調準,以及互補性資源。實證結 果顯示,在其他條件不變之下,獨立創投與公司創投投資案,若有較高選擇獨立創投為 合作夥伴的傾向,則會產生較好的績效。 在形成企業之間合作關係中,明智的夥伴選擇策略可以降低空間限制並導致較好的 投資績效。本研究結果顯示具產業不確定的獨立創投投資案,若有較高選擇公司創投的 傾向,因為可以接近並取得公司特有的互補資源與能力,能有較佳的績效表現。此外, 具地理不確定的公司創投投資案,若有較高選擇其他公司創投的傾向,因能促進協調活 動或降低競爭強度,有較佳的績效表現。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Venture Capital (VC) typically finances specific ventures under plenty of
uncertainties since rare public information is available as public listed companies. The uncertainty leads to information asymmetries and agency problems when the entrepreneurs who have private information on their business but often overstate the future profitability to secure the supply of financial capital from the VCs. One of the reasons for the VC industry to exist is to reduce information asymmetries and agency costs between entrepreneurs and investors. Traditional agency theory has been adopted to prescribe actions that focus on the protection of the investment of the principals (VCs) against the harmful behavior of the agents (entrepreneurs). Nevertheless, the emergence of syndication networks and the involvement of multiple parties in the VC investment motivate us to extend the principal-agent analysis to a multiple principal-agency framework to reason the organizing behavior of VC investments and their consequential performance. To develop theoretical arguments for hypotheses construction, this dissertation starts with spatial uncertainties at the industrial and the geographic dimensions that the VC confronts, explains the difficulty to reduce information asymmetries when industrial and geographic uncertainties exists. Using a comprehensive dataset of U.S. VC investments from 1980 and 2008, we find that existence of industrial and geographic uncertainties affect negatively on the performance of VC investments. Next, we develop a multiple principal-agency framework to analyze the alignment of goals and the alignment of actions deriving from cooperation and coordination as well as the influence of complementary resources determining the strategy of partner selection and performance outcomes for both IVCs and CVCs. Our empirical results suggest that, other things being equal, the preference to select IVCs as partners leads to superior performance for both IVCs and CVCs investments. Smart partner selection in the formation of interfirm relationships may reduce spatial limitations and lead to superior investment performance. The results in this dissertation show that superior performance in the IVC investment project with industrial uncertainties stems from a high tendency to syndicate with CVCs to access the corporate specific complementary resources and capabilities. Moreover, to obtain superior performance in the investment project with geographic uncertainties, the CVC investment should has a high propensity to syndicate with the other CVCs to facilitate coordination activities or reduce competitive intensity. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:52:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-D95724005-1.pdf: 820384 bytes, checksum: 81a0cdb9e01eb77a650eac88e21d3fe1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. v
1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 1 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Venture capital investments .............................................................................................. 5 2.2 Information economics and agency theory in VC investments ........................................ 9 2.3 Partner selection under uncertainties .............................................................................. 12 3. THEORATICAL BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESES ................................................. 19 3.1 Overview: from agency theory to a multiple principal-agency framework .................... 19 3.2 Spatial uncertainties and VC performance...................................................................... 22 3.3 Partner selection and VC performance ........................................................................... 27 3.4 Interaction of spatial uncertainties and partner selection ................................................ 41 4. METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 48 4.1 Sample............................................................................................................................ 48 4.2 Measures ......................................................................................................................... 49 4.3 Results ............................................................................................................................. 54 5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION .................................................................................... 57 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 73 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 不確定下之夥伴選策略與投資績效:創業投資之實證研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Partner Selection under Uncertainties and Venturing Success:Evidence from Venture Capital investments | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李吉仁,吳學良,陳俊忠,蘇國賢 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 夥伴選擇,不確定,創業投資,聯合投資網絡, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | partner selection,uncertainty,venture capital investment,syndication network, | en |
dc.relation.page | 96 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-10-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 801.16 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。