請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66636
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇以文(Lily I-wen Su) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Hung Li | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李家宏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:47:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-08 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-02-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-12-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | References
Allerton, D.J. 2002. Stretched verb constructions in English. New York: Routledge. Anthony, Laurence. 1999. Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 42: 38-46. Ayala, de Soledad Perez. 2002. Nominalization as impersonalization strategy: Some corpus notes for the study of agency mystification. Conceptualization of events in newspaper discourse: Mystification of agency and degree of implication in news reports, ed. by J. I. Marin Arrese, 55-70. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Baratta, Alexander M. 2008. Nominalization development across an undergraduate academic degree program. Journal of Pragmatics 42.1017-1036. Bhatia, V.K. 1993. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York: Longman. Biber, Douglas, Connor, Ulla and Upton, Thomas A. (ed.) 2007. Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education. Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brett, Paul. 1994. A genre-based analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes 13.47-59. Chafe, W., & Danielewics, J. 1987. Properties of spoken and written English. Comprehending oral and written language, ed. by R. Horowitz, S. J. Samuels. New York: Academic. Charles, Maggie. 2003. A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2.313–326. Comrie, Bernard and Sandra A. Thompson. 1985. Lexical nominalization. Language typology and syntactic description vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 334-409. Cambridge University Press. Cooper C. 1985. Aspects of article introductions in IEEE publications. M.S. dissertation, University of Aston, U.K. Council of biology editors (CBE) (ed.) 1994. Scientific style and format. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Day, R.A. (ed.) 1994. How to write and publish a scientific paper. Phoenix: Oryx Press. Downing, A. 1991. Encapsulating discourse topics. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 5.147-168. Einstein, Albert. 1934. Essays in science. New York: The Philosophical Library. Francis, Gill. 1994. Labelling discourse: An aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion. Advances in written text analysis, ed. By Coulthard, M., 83-101 London: Routledge. Galve, Ignacio Guillen. 1998. The textual interplay of grammatical metaphor on the nominalizations occurring in written medical English. Journal of Pragmatics 30.363-385. Gao, Wenyan. 2008. Information packaging in English medical papers published in a Chinese journal. CELEA Journal 3.42-47. Givon, Talmy. 1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ---. 1995. Functionalism and grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Gledhill, C. 2000. The discourse function of collocation in research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes 19.115-135. Graetz, N. 1985. Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts. Reading for professional purposes: Methods and materials n teaching language, ed. by J. M. Ulijn & A. K. Pugh, 123-135. Amersfoot: Leuven. Halliday, M. A. K. & C. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar 3rd. London: Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K. 1989. Some grammatical problems in scientific English. Paper presented at a meeting of the Society of Pakistani English Language Teachers. ---. 1994. An Introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold. Hamp-Lyons, Liz, and Heaseley, Ben. 2006. Study writing: A course in writing skills for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hartnett, Carolyn G. 2004. Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches. New York: Continuum. Hengl, T., & Mike Gould. 2006. The unofficial guide for authors: Or how to produce research articles worth citing. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Hinkel, E. 2004. Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Mahwah, New Jersey: L. Erlbaum Associates. Hoey, Mickael (ed.) 1983. On the surface of discourse. London: Allen and Unwin. Holmes, R. 1997. Genre analysis and social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 16.321-337. Hyland, K. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic genres. London: Longman. ---. 2001. Humble servant of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 20.207-226. ---. 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7.173-192. ---. 2006. Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. Academic discourse across disciplines, ed. by K. Hyland & M. Bondi, 17-45. Frankfort: Peter Lang. Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2005. Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes 24.269-292. Kerz, Elma. 2008. The cognitive and pragmatic motivations for the use of nominalizations in academic texts. English as an additional language in research publication and communication, ed. by Sally Burges & Pedro Martin, 123-137. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Lachowicz, D. 1981. On the use of the passive voice for objectivity, author responsibility and hedging in EST. Science of Science, 2.105-115. Lancaster, F. W. 1991. Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. Library Association Publishing Ltd. Leggett, Glenn, C. David Mead, & Melinda G. Kramer. 1995. Prentice Hall Handbook for Writers. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Lores, Rosa. 2004. On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes 23.280-302. MacDonald, Susan. 1987. Problem definition in academic writing. College English 49.315-331. ---. 1994. Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. Magnusso, Ulf, and, Gunnar Persson. 1986. Facets, phases, and foci: Studies in lexical relations in English. Sockhom, Sweden: Almqvist & Wilksell International. Manchard, H. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. Munich: C. H. Beck. Myers, G. 1989. The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10.1-35. Nwogu, K.N., 1997. The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 16.119-138. Orasan, Constantin. 2001. Patterns in scientific abstracts. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001 Conference 433-443. Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Posteguillo, Santiago. 1999. The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes 18.139-160. Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, & June Johnson. The Allyn & Bacon guide to writing. New York : Pearson Longman. Ravelli, Louise. 1996. Making language accessible: Successful text writing for museum visitors. Linguistics & Education 8.367–388. Salager-Meyer, F. 1994. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes. 13.149-171. Samraj, Betty. 2002. Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 21.1-17 ---. 2005. An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 24.141-156. Santos, M. B. D. 1996. The textual organization of research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Text 16.481-499. Stotesbury, Hilkka. 2003. Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2.327-341. Swales, J. 1981. Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, UK: The University of Aston. ---. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ---. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. Motives for Language change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124-139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Traugott, Elizabeth C., and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Unsworth, Len. 1997. ‘Sound’ explanations in school science: A functional linguistic perspective on effective apprenticing texts. Linguistics and Education 9.199-226. Yang, R., & Allison, D. 2003. Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 22.365-385. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66636 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文探討學術寫作中,名物化的分佈與功能。以文步分析作為理論架構,我們檢視由動詞轉化而來的事件性名物化,在兩本醫學期刊摘要與背景部份的使用情況。
量化方面,我們發現名物化的頻率在摘要部份中的結論文步為最高。第二高者為摘要中的背景文步,接著是摘要中的方法文步,而頻率最低者為摘要中的結果文步。在背景部份中,名物化頻率最高者為文步一-建立領域,其次是文步二-建立利基,而名物化頻率最低的則是文步三-呈現本文。名物化的分佈可由新舊資訊的含量作出解釋。 就語用分析而言,名物化有三個主要的功能符合了各別文步的溝通目的。這三個語用功能為認知功能、文本功能,以及互動功能。切確地說,認知功能把過程和事件視為抽象名詞,進而包裝更多的資訊。文本功能維擊文章中的凝結性。 互動功能傳達非個人化語氣並表達作者的立場。 本論文探討了學術文章摘要與背景裏名物化的使用與文步溝通目的之間的關係。本文的研究成果不僅能讓我們更加瞭解,特定學科裏語言特徵在修辭組織中的角色,也對英文學術寫作之教學做出貢獻。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | English Abstract
This thesis investigates the distribution and functions of nominalization in academic writing. Using move analysis as our framework, we examine the usage of deverbalized eventive nominalization in the abstract and background sections in two medical journals. Quantitatively, we found that the frequency of nominalization in the CONCLUSION of the abstract section was the highest, followed by BACKGROUND, METHOD, and RESULT. In the background section, the frequency of nominalization in Move 1 ESTABLISHING A TERRITORY was the highest, followed by Move 2 ESTABLISHING A NICHE, and Move 3 PRESENTING THE PRESENT WORK. The distribution of nominalization can be explained with regard to the amount of new information. In terms of the pragmatic analysis, three main functions were found to serve the communicative purpose of the move where the nominalization occurred. These pragmatic functions are cognitive, textual and interactional functions. Specifically, cognitive function treats processes and events as abstract nouns and packs more information into a given clause. Textual function maintains cohesion in texts. Interactional function conveys an impersonal tone and expresses the author’s stance. This thesis uncovers the use of nominalization with regard to the communicative purposes of the moves in the abstract and background sections of research articles. The findings should not only contribute to the understanding of discipline-specific linguistic features regarding rhetorical organization in journal articles but also carry pedagogical implications for academic English instruction. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:47:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97142007-1.pdf: 430069 bytes, checksum: 039acf6f34995db1424ac4678ed292ba (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
Acknowledgement i English Abstract ii Chinese Abstract iii Table of Contents iv List of Tables vi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation of the Study 1 1.2 Research Questions 4 Chapter 2 Literature Review 6 2.1 Structural Characteristics of Nominalization 6 2.2 Pragmatic Functions of Nominalization 10 2.3 Move Analysis 14 2.3.1 Overview of Past Research 14 2.3.2 Move Analysis of the Abstract Section 17 2.3.3 Move Analysis of the Background Section 18 Chapter 3 Methodology 24 3.1 Criteria for the Identification of Nominalization 25 3.2 Data 28 3.2.1 Selection of Journals 29 3.2.2 Data of the Abstract Section 31 3.3 Analytical Framework: Move Analysis 32 3.3.1 Moves in the Abstract Section 33 3.3.2 Moves in the Background Section 35 Chapter 4 Distribution and Functions of Nominalization in the Abstract Section 40 4.1 Distribution of Nominalization in the Moves of the Abstract Section 40 4.2 Functions of Nominalization in the Moves of the Abstract Section 43 4.2.1 Deverbalized Eventive Nominalization in the BACKGROUND Move 43 4.2.2 Deverbalized Eventive Nominalization in the METHOD Move 48 4.2.3 Deverbalized Eventive Nominalization in the RESULT Move 51 4.2.4 Deverbalized Eventive Nominalization in the CONCLUSION Move 54 4.3 Summary of the Chapter 59 Chapter 5 Distribution and Functions of Nominalization in the Background Section 61 5.1 Distribution of Nominalization in the Moves of the Background Section 61 5.2 Functions of Nominalization in the Moves of the Background Section 64 5.2.1 Deverbalized Eventive Nominalization in Move 1 of the Background Section 65 5.2.2 Deverbalized Eventive Nominalization in Move 2 of the Background Section 69 5.2.3 Deverbalized Eventive Nominalization in Move 3 of the Background Section 72 5.3 Summary of the Chapter 78 Chapter 6 Conclusion 79 6.1 Summary of the Findings 79 6.2 Theoretical Implications 82 6.3 Pedagogical Implications 83 6.4 Directions for Future Research 84 References 86 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 名物化在醫學期刊「摘要」與「背景」的語用分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Nominalization in the Abstract and Background Sections of Medical Journals: A Pragmatic Exploration | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝舒凱(Shu-Kai Hsieh),葉修文(Shiou-Wen Yeh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 學術寫作,名物化,文步分析,語法隱喻,凝結性,非個人化, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | academic writing,nominalization,move analysis,grammatical metaphor,cohesion,impersonalization, | en |
dc.relation.page | 92 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-12-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 語言學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 419.99 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。