請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66543
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 馬鴻文(Hwong-Wen Ma) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsiu-Wen Li | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李秀雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:41:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-02-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-01-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 【1】Asari, M. , Fukui, K. , Sakai, S. . 2008. Life-Cycle Flow of Mercury and Recycling Scenario of Fluorescent Lamps in Japan. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 393(1): 1-10.
【2】Cain, A., Disch, S., Twarski, C., Reindl, J.& Case, C.R. . 2007. Substance flow analysis of mercury intentionally used in products in the United States. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 11(3): 61-75. 【3】Graedel, T.E. and Allenby,B.R. . 2003. Industrial Ecology, 2nd Edition. Pearson Education. Saddle Point. 【4】Hansen, E., and Lassen,C. . 2000. Paradigm for Substance Flow Analysis. Guide for SFAs carried out for the Danish EPA. Environmental Project 577. 【5】Hirato, T.,Daigo, I., Matsuno, Y., Adachi, Y. . 2009.In-use stock of steel estimated by top- down approach and bottom-up approach. ISIJ International. 49(12):1967-1971. 【6】Hylander, L.D. and Goodsite, M.E. . 2003. Environmental costs of mercury pollution. Science of the Total Environment. 368:352–370. 【7】Jasinski, S. M. 1995. The materials flow of mercury in the United States. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling. 15(3) : 145-179. 【8】Kesler, S.E. 1994. Mineral resources, economics, and the environment. Macmillan College Publishing Company. 【9】Mao, J.S., J. Dong, and T.E. Graedel. 2008. The multilevel cycle of anthropogenic lead. I Methodology. Resources, Conservation,and Recyling. 52: 1058-1064. 【10】Mao, J.S., J. Dong, and T.E. Graedel. 2008. The multilevel cycle of anthropogenic lead. II. Results and discussion, Resources,Conservation,and Recyling. 52: 1050-1057. 【11】McDonough, William. , Braungart, Michael. . 2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. Farrar Straus and Giroux. 【12】Park,J., Hong,S.,Kim,I.,Lee,J and Hur,T. . 2004. Dynamic material flow analysis of steel resources in Korea, Resources. Conservation and Recycling. 55: 456-462. 【13】Timmermans,V. and Holderbeke,M.V. . 2004. Practical experiences on applying substance flow analysis in Flanders: bookkeeping and static modelling of chromium. Journal of Cleaner Production. 12:935–945. 【14】United Nations Environment Programme. 2002. Global Mercury Assessment. Inter-Organization Programme For The Sound Management Of Chemicals. 【15】United Nations Environment Programme. 2006. Summary of Supply, Trade and Demand Information on Mercury. Chemicals Branch. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics. 【16】United Nations Environment Programme. 2008. The Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment: Sources, Emissions and Transport. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme. 【17】United Nations Environment Programme. 2011. Toolkit For Identification And Quantification Of Mercury Releases. Inter-Organization Programme For The Sound Management Of Chemicals. 【18】U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. EPA's Roadmap for Mercury. 【19】World Resources Institute. 2005. Material Flow Accounts: A Tool For Making Environmental Policy. Washington D.C. 【20】World Resources Institute. 2008. Material Flows in the United States: A Physical Accounting of the U.S. Industrial Economy. Washington D.C. 【21】行政院農委會,2009,2009年農業統計年報。 【22】行政院環境保護署,2007a,含汞廢棄物產生源調查及資源化處理技術之研究計畫 。 【23】行政院環境保護署,2007b,推動含汞產品禁限用計畫。 【24】行政院環境保護署,2009b,提升廢乾電池及廢照明光源回收處理成效暨重金屬含量抽驗調查專案工作計畫。 【25】原田正純著、謝旺全譯,1994,水俁病-日本工廠廢水所引發的公害病例,行政院環境保護署出版。 【26】原田正純著、謝旺全譯,1994,水俣病餘波仍在盪漾(水俣病は終っていない, 原田正純原著) ,行政院環境保護署出版。 【27】陳起鳳、柳中明,2008,氣候變遷調適情境分析與應用,Global Change and Sustainable Development,第2卷第2期,頁34-50。 【28】張添晉,2010,國內含汞產品之流布與管理,永續產業發展雙月刊,第48期,頁68-771。 【29】劉鎮宗,1995,汞對生態環境的影響,科學發展,第301期。 【30】經濟部礦務局,2010,2010年礦業統計年報。 【31】孔慧雯,2005,高科技產業含汞燈管流佈與管理之研究,國立臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所,碩士論文。 【32】李淑莉,2008,臺灣地區燃煤發電廠含汞物質流布與管理之研究,國立臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所,碩士論文。 【33】吳嘉浤,2008,汞削減政策與管理趨勢之研究 ,國立臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所,碩士論文。 【34】許繼穎,2008,廢含汞元件熱脫附處理之研究 ,國立臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所,碩士論文。 【35】洪志華,2008,醫療電子產業發展模式之研究—數位血壓計之案例,私立長庚大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。 【36】張琪惠,2010,臺灣地區鉛之物質流分析與環境衝擊評估,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所,碩士論文。 【37】顏佳慧,2008,汞污染場址整治復育與監督管理之實驗研究,國立臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所,碩士論文。 【38】顏晟容,2011,臺灣地區汞之物質流分析及其衝擊評估,國立臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所,碩士論文。 【39】蘇宏仁,2009,臺灣地區砷之物質流分析,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所,碩士論文。 【40】行政院環境保護署,2008,限制乾電池製造、輸入及販賣(97.07.16.修正),廢棄物清理法。 【41】行政院環境保護署,2008,限制水銀體溫計輸入及販賣(97.03.26.訂定),廢棄物清理法。 【42】行政院環境保護署,2011b,照明光源費率及補貼費率修正草案,廢棄物清理法。 【43】行政院環境保護署,2011c,列管毒性化學物質及其運作管理事項(100.07.20.修正),毒性化學物質管理法。 【44】內政部消防署,2010,一般爆竹煙火型式認可及個別認可作業辦法(99.12.06修正),爆竹煙火管理條例。 【45】Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2007. 2007 CERCLA Priority List of Hazardous Substances. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/cercla/07list.html 【46】BBC中文網. 2011.日本水俁病半世紀訴訟落下帷幕 . http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/world/2010/03/100329_japan_disease.shtml. 【47】Danish Ministry of the Environment. 2011. Fact Sheet: Mercury. http://www.mst.dk/English/Chemicals/legislation_on_chemicals/fact_sheets/Fact_Sheet_Mercury.htm. 【48】Europa. 2005. Community strategy concerning mercury. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/internal_market/single_market_for_goods/chemical_products/l28155_en.htm. 【49】European Parliament. 2008. Export-ban of mercury and mercury compounds from the EU by 2011. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=IM-PRESS&reference=20080516BRI29011&secondRef=ITEM-008-EN&format=XML&language=EN. 【50】Food and Drug Administration. 2004. What You Need to Know About Mercury in Fish and Shellfish (Brochure) . http://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm110591.htm. 【51】Govenment Offices of Sweden. 2009. Government bans all use of mercury in Sweden. http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/11459/a/118550. 【52】International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2011. Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs. Volumes 1–100. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/ClassificationsAlphaOrder.pdf. 【53】Integrated Risk Information System. 2001. Methylmercury (MeHg) (CASRN 22967—92—6) . http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0073.htm. 【54】National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2011. NIST Chemistry WebBook. http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/. 【55】Norwegian Ministry of the Environment. 2008. Bans Mercury In Products. http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/md/press-centre/Press-releases/2007/Bans-mercury-in-products.html?id=495138. 【56】The Federal Environment Ministry of Germany. 2011. Act revising the law of waste-related product responsibility for batteries and accumulators (Batteries Act) . http://www.bmu.de/english/waste_management/downloads/doc/46810.php 【57】Swedish National Chemicals Inspectorate. 1997. Mercuryin products—A source of transboundary pollutant transport. http://www.kemi.se/en/. 【58】United Nations Environment Programme. 2007. NGOi Proposal for a Global Mercury Strategy at the 2007 UNEP Governing Council Meeting. http://www.unep.org/civil_society/GCSF8/pdfs/NGO-UNEP-GC-Proposal-2007.pdf. 【59】U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Integrated Risk Information System. 1995. Mercury. elemental (CASRN 7439—97—6) . http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0370.htm. 【60】U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. EPA's Roadmap for Mercury,http://www.epa.gov/hg/roadmap.htm 【61】U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. EPA's Roadmap for Mercury. http://www.epa.gov/hg/roadmap.htm 【62】U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2011. Banning Mercury Amalgam. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/DentalProductsPanel/UCM236379.pdf 【63】Yale Center for Industrial Ecology CIE. 2004. Yale Stocks and Flows (STAF) Project.,http://www.envirolink.org/resource.html?itemid=200403022026450.796671&catid=1. 【64】內政部消防署全球資訊網,2010,爆竹煙火場所一覽,http://www.nfa.gov.tw/Show.aspx?MID=1174&UID=1174&PID=0。 【65】中華民國統計資訊網,2011,人口數及人口增加率,http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15408&CtNode=3623&mp=4。 【66】行政院勞工委員會,2010,危害物質危害數據資料,http://ghs.cla.gov.tw/CHT/intro/MSDS.aspx?casno=7439—97—6。 【67】行政院環境保護署,2010a,毒理資料庫查詢,http://flora2.epa.gov.tw/toxicweb/ToxicUC4/UC4—1.aspx。 【68】行政院環境保護署,2008,環保新聞專區,http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_index.asp。 【69】行政院環境保護署,2011a,環保法規,http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/epalaw/index.aspx。 【70】行政院環境保護署,2009,業者自發辦理廢電池、廢照明光源回收兌換為環保盡心力,http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?InputTime=0981120141328。 【71】香港貿發網,2006,美國加強監管含汞產品,http://www.hktdc.com/info/mi/ari/baus/tc/2006072615/美國商情快訊.htm。 【72】財政部關稅總局,2011,統計資料庫查詢,http://web.customs.gov.tw/statistic/statistic/statisticList.asp。 【73】產業技術知識服務計畫(ITIS智網),2010,產品群統計資料,http://www.itis.org.tw/ 。 【74】資源回收網,2010,統計資料,http://recycle.epa.gov.tw/Recycle/epa/ShowPage2.aspx?sno=1010。 【75】經濟部能源局,2010,能源統計年報個別能源,http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/opengovinfo/Plan/all/energy_year/main/EnergyYearMain.aspx?PageId=default 。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66543 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 汞是毒性化學物質,卻廣泛運用在電池、恆溫器、溫度計、燈管、血壓計、陀螺儀……等各種產品。臺灣不產汞,原料全仰賴進口,根據財政部關稅總局進口量,資料顯示2000至2009年汞與氯化汞平均進口量約6.3公噸,使用量高。再者,目前廢棄物項目僅有廢照明光源,回收為原料汞,其餘皆是將污染物濃縮成廢棄物,後續再採取隔絕或隔離的方式儲存在土壤圈,事實上,污染物依然存在。因此,為瞭解臺灣含汞物質種類、特徵、流布、管理效果等,本研究首先簡介汞的物理、化學與毒理特性,再回顧日本水俁病與國內外汞污染事件及法令管制現況,強調管理的重要性。其次,為分析臺灣含汞物質的流動過程,包含原料、半成品/產品製造、使用、廢棄物處理與回收等階段,使用物質流方法,定出「量」的資訊,建立基準線後,再判定管理效果;換句話說,就是以物質流方法探討臺灣含汞物質的管理。除此之外,為了進一步找出最有管理方式,設計推演「情境」,希望作為決策方案參考依據。
研究結果顯示2006—2009年34種195項含汞物質總汞量為155.548公噸;總輸入量(總進口量)為229.830公噸,具經濟價值(可回收)佔76%;不具經濟價值(難回收)佔24%;總輸出量(總出口量)為95.742公噸,具經濟價值佔94%;不具經濟價值佔6%;國內開採量為0.760公噸(其中升級回收量佔0.359公噸,開採量佔0.402公噸),具經濟價值佔47%,不具經濟價值佔53%;存量為57.577公噸,整體廢棄物掌握率逐年遞減,整體升級回收率全部未達1%;國內排放量為76.913公噸,排放至空氣佔49%;排放至水體佔2%;排放至土壤佔49%。 輸出入汞量皆是半成品/產品階段最高。輸出入淨值汞量前十大項目分別為電池、原油、煤、汞、溫度計、恆溫器、鐵、血壓計、石灰、鋁。不具經濟價值方面,總輸入量以原料階段汞量高於半成品/產品階段,代表項目是煤及原油;總輸出量以半成品/產品階段汞量比原料階段高,主要代表項目為水泥、顏料、石油。 國內排放量,原物料階段部分,釋放於空氣主要項目分別為原油、煤、鐵;釋放於水體主要項目是鋁;釋放於土壤主要項目為銅和金。半成品/產品階段部分,釋放於空氣主要項目分別為水泥、石油、牙齒汞齊;釋放於水體主要項目是牙齒汞齊、電池、燈,牙齒汞齊與燈;釋放於土壤含汞項目為電池和燈。使用階段部分,釋放於空氣主要項目為水泥、顏料、燈;釋放於水體主要項目是牙齒汞齊、顏料;釋放於土壤則無主要含汞項目。廢棄物處理與回收部分,不論釋放於空氣、水體與土壤主要項目皆是廢乾電池、廢汞及其化合物、污泥,又以廢乾電池排放到土壤量最高。 推演情境結果,只有禁止輸出入與國內製造產品情境,才能將降低總汞量,倘若要提升整體升級回收量,需組合增列回收項目、改變拋棄習慣與提升廢棄物回收與處理設備三項情境。十七個推演情境,整體升級回收率皆低於30%,其中第十七個情境結果顯示,即使禁用原料汞與半成品/產品階段所有具經濟價值(可回收)的含汞產品,仍有汞量存在。 整體來說,含汞物質種類複雜,而且具有人類圈代謝典型特徵,輸入量大於輸出量與存量。主要含汞項目由2006年的電池轉為2009年恆溫器,顯示禁或限用法令規範具有顯著成效,但整體廢棄物掌握率下降,應再禁用其他含汞產品。 具體而言,提高整體升級回收率所面臨的技術瓶頸高,線性流難變為循環流;因此,建議不具經濟價值含汞物質管理方式應朝管末處理,具經濟價值產品應採取全面禁用,舊有的含汞產品則是集中掩埋隔離,毋須再升級回收。與此相應,本研究所定義的整體廢棄物掌握率與整體升級回收率兩項指標,是可以作為管理的參考依據。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Mercury is a poisonous chemical substance, but has been widely used in battery, thermostat, thermometer, fluorescent tube, sphygmomanometer, gyroscope, and other products. Taiwan does not produce mercury; thus, all of the raw materials rely on import. According to the import statistics of the Directorate General of Customs, Ministry of Finance, the average imports of mercury and mercuric chloride from 2000 to 2009 were 6.3 metric ton (MT), which is very high. In addition, the current recycling item for mercury only includes the Waste fluorescent lamps, while other pollutants were compressed into waste and stored in the pedosphere through isolation or insulation. In fact, the pollutants still exist. In order to know the categories, characteristics, spread and management effects of mercury-contained substances in Taiwan, this study first introduced the physical, chemical and poisonous characteristics of mercury. It then reviewed the Minamata Disease in Japan, the domestic and foreign mercury pollution cases, and related and regulations, in order to emphasize the importance of waste mercury management. This study also analyzed the flow of the mercury-contained substances in Taiwan, including raw materials, fabrication and manufacture, use, waste management and recycling process, Substance flow analysis was conducted to determine the amount, establish the base line, and evaluate the management effect. In other words, substance flow analysis was used to discuss the management of mercury-contained substances in Taiwan. In addition, to find the most effective management method, derivative scenarios were designed as the reference for decision schemes.
According to the research results, from 2006 to 2009, the total mercury content of 34 kinds and 195 mercury-contained substances was 155.548MT. The input (imports) was 229.830MT;those with economic value (recyclable) accounted for 76%, and those with non-economic value (non-recyclable) accounted for 24%. The output (exports) was 95.742 MT; those with economic value accounted for 94%, and those with non-economic value accounted for 6%. Domestic extraction was 0.760MT (where, the total amount of upcycling was 0.359MT and the extraction amount was 0.402MT); those with economic value accounted for 47%, and those with non-economic value accounted for 53%. The stock was 57.577MT, the waste management rate decreased year by year and all of the upcycling rates failed to achieve 1%. The domestic processed output was 76.913MT; those outputted to atmosphere accounted for 49%,and those to the water body and the soil accounted for 2%, and 49%,respectively. The input and output were both the highest in the semi-finished product/product phase. The top ten items with largest input and output net mercury amounts were battery, crude oil, coal, mercury, thermometer, thermostat, iron, medical blood pressure gauges, lime and aluminum. As for those with non-economic value, the input in production phase was higher than that in semi-finished/finished products phase, where, the representative items were coal and crude oil. The output in semi-finished/finished products phase was higher than that in production phase, where, the representative items were cement, pigment and petroleum. As for the processed output in Taiwan, in the raw material phase, the main items outputted to the atmosphere were crude oil, coal and iron; that outputted to water body was aluminum and those outputted to soil were copper and gold. In the semi-finished/finished products phase, the main items outputted to the atmosphere were cement, petroleum and teeth amalgam; those outputted to water body were teeth amalgam, battery, lamp, teeth amalgam and lamp; those outputted to soil were battery and lamp. In the use phase, the main items outputted to the atmosphere were cement, pigment and lamp; those outputted to water body were teeth amalgam and pigment; those outputted to soil did not include main mercury-contained items. In the waste management and recycling phase, the main items outputted to atmosphere, water body and soil were all waste dry battery, waste mercury and its chemical compound and sewage sludge, where, the amount of waste dry battery outputted to the soil was the highest. According to the derivative scenarios, only through prohibiting input and output as well as semi-finished/finished products in Taiwan could the total amount of mercury be reduced. If the total amount of upcycling was to be increased, the three scenarios, i.e. recycling items increasing, abandoning habit change and waste recycling and treatment equipment improvement, should be combined. The upcycling rates of 17 derivative scenarios were all lower than 30%, where, indicated by the 17th scenario results, even though the mercury-contained products with economic value (recyclable) in production and semi-finished/finished products semi-finished/finished products phases were prohibited, mercury amount still existed. On the whole, the mercury-contained materials had complex categories and the typical characteristics of anthroposphere, and their input was larger than output and stock. The main mercury-contained items changed from battery in 2006 to thermostat in 2009, indicating that the prohibition or restriction laws and regulations had significant effect. However, the waste management rate decreased, thus, the other mercury-contained products should be prohibited. The improvement of upcycling rate faced high technical bottleneck and linear flow was hard to be changed into circular flow. Thus, it was strongly recommended that the mercury-containing substances without economic value should be tightened emission standards, while, those with economic value should be prohibited. The existing mercury-contained products should be centralized, buried and insulated, without upcycling. Correspondingly, the two indicators defined in this research, i.e. waste management rate and upcycling rate, could serve a reference for management. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:41:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-P98541205-1.pdf: 2371801 bytes, checksum: 75dece2e6bbf79dae86b0ff21ae2102d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
致謝 II 摘要 III Abstract V 目錄 IX 圖目錄 XI 表目錄 XIII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究目的 4 1.3 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 2.1 基本特性 6 2.2 污染事件與管制現況 10 2.2.1國外污染事件與管制現況 10 2.2.2國內污染事件與管制現況 15 2.3 物質流分析 21 2.4 汞相關文獻評析 27 2.4.1元素流分析相關文獻與評析 27 2.4.2 UNEP鑑別並定量汞排放工具包 30 2.5 綜合評析 32 第三章 研究方法 35 3.1 目標及範疇界定 35 3.2 資料盤查與模式設定 42 3.2.1物質流模式介紹與誤差來源 42 3.2.2經濟圈資料盤查 48 3.2.3環境圈資料盤查 50 3.2.4情境設定 51 第四章 結果與討論 54 4.1 汞物質流結果闡釋 54 4.1.1汞物質流結果分析 54 4.1.2汞物質流經濟圈流量分析 61 4.1.3汞物質流環境圈流量分析 71 4.2 情境分析結果闡釋 86 4.3 探討臺灣含汞物質的管理 89 第五章 結論與建議 92 5.1 結論 92 5.2 建議 95 引用文獻 98 附錄 103 附錄A 經濟圈汞的盤查清單 103 A—1 2006—2009年輸出入盤查清單 103 A—2 2006—2009年國內生產盤查清單 122 附錄B 環境圈汞的輸出途徑比例 126 附錄C 推演情境設定 130 附錄D 2006—2009年各項目汞量 136 D—1 2006—2009年輸出入汞量盤查清單 136 D—2 2006—2009年國內生產汞量盤查清單 143 附錄E推演情境結果 144 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以物質流方法探討臺灣含汞物質的管理 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on the Management of Mercury in Taiwan using Substance Flow Analysis | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李公哲(Kung-Cheh Li),闕蓓德(Pei-Te Chiueh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 汞,物質流分析,整體廢棄物掌握率,整體升級回收率,聯合國環境規劃署鑑別並定量汞排放工具包, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Mercury,Substance flow analysis,Waste Management Rate,Upcycling Rate,UNEP Toolkit For Identification And Quantification Of Mercury Releases, | en |
dc.relation.page | 149 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-01-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.32 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。