請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66521
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳青松(Ching-Sung Wu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Bo-Ru Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃柏儒 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:40:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-02-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-01-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 英文參考文獻
[1]Agrawal, A., Jaffe, and Mandelker, G., (1992), “The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: a re-examination of an anomaly”, Journal of Finance, 47: 1605-1621. [2]Amburgey, T. L. and Miner, A. S. (1992), “Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity”, Strategic Management Journal, 13: 335-348. [3]Barkema, H.G., Bell J.H., and Pennings, J.M. (1996), “Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 151-166. [4]Barney, J. B. (1986), “Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy”, Management Science, 32(10): 1231-1241. [5]Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120. [6]Bradley, M., Desai, A., and Kim, E. H. (1988), “Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms”, Journal of Financial Economics, 21: Issue 1, 3-40. [7]Buono, A. F., Bowditch, J. L., and Lewis III, J. W. (1985), “When cultures collide: The anatomy of a merger”, Human Relations, 38(5): 477-500. [8]Buono, A. F. and Bowditch, J. L. (1989), “The human side of mergers and acquisitions”, Human Resource Management, 28(2): 301-304. [9]Cakici, N., Hessel, C. and Tandon, K. (1996), “Foreign acquisitions in the United States: Effect on shareholder wealth of foreign acquiring firms”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(2): 307-329. [10]Child, J. Chung, L. and Davies, H. (2003), “The performance of cross-border unit in China: a test of natural selection, strategic choice and contingency theories”, Journal of Financial Economies, 34: 242-254. [11]Datta, D. K. and Puia, G. (1995), “Cross-Border Acquisitions: An Examination of the influence of Relatedness and Cultural Fit on Shareholder Value Creation in U.S. Acquiring Firms”, Management International Review, 35: 337-359. [12]Eckbo, E., Giammarino, R., and Heinkel, R. (1990), “Asymmetric information and the medium of exchange in takeovers: Theory and tests”, Review of Financial Studies, 3: 651-675. [13]Fowler, K. and Schmidt, D. (1989), “Determinants of tender offer post-acquisition financial performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 10: 339-350. [14]Ghosh, A. (2001), “Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions?”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(2): 151-178. [15]Ghoshal, S. (1987), “Global strategy: An organizing framework”, Strategic Management Journal, 8: 425-440. [16]Haleblian, J. and Finkelstein, S. (1999), “The Influence of Organizational Acquisition Experience on Acquisition Performance: A Behavioral Learning Perspective”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1): 29-56. [17]Han, C. M. (2002), “Korea's direct investments in China: technology, experience, and ownership factors in performance”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(1): 109-126. [18]Harris, R. S. and Ravenscraft, D. (1991), “The role of acquisitions in foreign direct investment: Evidence from the U.S. stock market”, The Journal of Finance, 46(3): 825-844. [19]Healy, P. M., Palepu, K. G., and Ruback, R. S. (1992), “Does corporate performance improve after mergers?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 31: 135-175. [20]Hitt, M., Harrison, H., Ireland, R. D., and Best, A. (1998), “Attributes of successful and unsuccessful acquisitions of US firms”, British Journal of Management, 9(2): 91-114. [21]Jemison, D. B. and Sitkin, S. B. (1986), “Corporate acquisitions: A process perspective”, Academy of Management, 11(1): 145-163. [22]Jensen, M. C. (1986), “Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers”, The American Economic Review, 76(2): 323-329. [23]Kale, P., Singh, H., and Perlmutter, H. (2000), “Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 217-237. [24]Kang, J. K. (1993), “The international market for corporate control: Mergers and acquisitions of U.S. firms by Japanese firms”, Journal of Financial Economics, 34: 345-371. [25]Kumar, S. and Bansal, L. K. (2008), “The impact of mergers and acquisitions on corporate performance in India”, Management Decision, 48(10): 1531-1543. [26]Kusewitt, J. B. (1985), “An exploratory study of strategic acquisition factors relating to performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 6(2): 151-169. [27]Kwok, C.C.Y. and Reeb, D.M., (2000), “Internationalization and firm risks: an upstream–downstream hypothesis”, Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4): 611-629. [28]Larsson, R. and Finkelstein, S. (1999), “Integrating Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquisitions: A Case Survey of Synergy Realization”, Organization Science, 10(1): 1-26. [29]Leger, P. M. and Quach, L. (2009), “Post-merger performance in the software industry: The impact of characteristics of the software product portfolio”, Technovation, 29(10): 704-713. [30]Linn, S. C. and Switzer, J.A. (2001), “Are cash acquisitions associated with better postcombination operating performance than stock acquisitions?”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(6): 1113-1138. [31]Levitt, B. and March, J. G. (1988), “Organizational learning”, Annual review of sociology, 14: 319-340. [32]March, J. G. (1991), “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87. [33]Markides, C. C. and Ittner, C. (1994), “Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification: evidence from U.S. international acquisitions”, Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2): 343-366. [34]Markides, C. and Oyon, D. (1998), “International acquisitions:: Do they create value for shareholders?”, European Management Journal, 16(2): 125-135. [35]Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., and Xie, F. (2007), “Corporate Governance and Acquirer Returns”, The Journal of Finance, 62(4): 1851-1889. [36]Morosini, P., Shane, S., and Singh, H. (1998), “National Cultural Distance and Cross-Border Acquisition Performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137-158. [37]Ooghe, H. and Balcaen S. (2000), “De financie‥le toestand van de Belgische ondernemingen: sleutelratio’s en risicoindicatoren 1991–1999”, Diegem: Kluwer/Ced.Samson. [38]Ravenscraft D. J. and Scherer F. M. (1987), “Life after takeover”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(2): 147-156. [39]Schoenberg, R. (2006), “Measuring the Performance of Corporate Acquisitions: An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Metrics”, British Journal of Management, 17(4): 361-370. [40]Seth, A. (1990), “Value creation in acquisitions: A re-examination of performance issues”, Strategic Management Journal, 11(2): 99-115. [41]Shimizu, K., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D., and Pisano, V. (2004), “Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: a review of current research and recommendations for the future”, Journal of International Management, 10(3): 307-353. [42]Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1986), “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control”, The Journal of Political Economy, 94(3): 461-488. [43]Shrader, R. C., Oviatt, B. M. and McDougall, P. P. (2000), “How New Ventures Exploit Trade-Offs among International Risk Factors: Lessons for the Accelerated Internationization of the 21st Century”, The Academy of Management Journal, 43(6): 1227-1247. [44]Tsai, W. and Ghoshal, S. (1998), “Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks”, Academy of Management Journal, 41(4): 464-476. [45]Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986), “Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches”, Acadamy of Management Review, 11(4): 801-814. [46]Weston, J. L., Mitchell, M. L., and Mulherin, J. H. (2004), “Takeovers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance, Fourth Edition”, Prentice Hall. [47]Woo, C.Y. and Willard, G. (1983), “Performance representation in business policy research: Discussion and recommendation”, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual National Meetings of the Academy of Management, 1983. [48]World Invest Report 2000, UNCTAD, 100-102. [49]World Invest Report 2007, UNCTAD, 14-15. [50]World Invest Report 2010, UNCTAD, anxtab 9-12. [51]Zaheer, S. (1995), “Overcoming the liability of foreignness”, Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341-363. [52]Zhu, P. C. and Malhotra, S. (2008), “Announcement Effect and Price Pressure: An Empirical Study of Cross-Border Acquisitions by Indian Firms”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 13(1): 24-41. 中文參考文獻 [1]伍忠賢(2002),「企業併購理論與實務」,新陸書局股份有限公司 [2]黃財尉(2003),「共同因素分析與主成份分析之比較」,彰化師大輔導學報,25期,63-86頁 [3]徐之昇(2003),「策略聯盟與企業績效關係:美國製藥產業之實證研究」,國立清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文 [4]康惠如(2005),「企業重組與併購~兼論台灣近五年十大併購案之併購行為與績效分析~」,國立臺灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文 [5]王焯(2006),「中國機械類上市公司併購績效的實證分析」,蘭州商學院學報,年,22期,85-91頁 [6]倪鈺茹(2007),「企業併購與經營績效之研究-以EVA與FCF為衡量指標」,中原大學會計研究所碩士論文 [7]張晉嘉(2008),「以類神經網路預測企業併購成敗」,國立臺南大學科技管理研究所碩士論文 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66521 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究以SDC資料庫搜尋1997年至2006年台灣企業跨國併購案,並以TEJ資料庫篩選出上市公司,樣本包含45間企業的62個併購案。之後利用因素分析法衡量跨國併購績效,再以績效分析之結果為依變數,進行多元迴歸分析,了解跨國併購績效的影響因素。
以因素分析法結合十一個績效指標的實證結果顯示,台灣上市公司跨國併購後,於併購後第一年,財報績效表現優於併購前,且併購的影響延續到併購後第二年,一樣優於併購前。但對於併購第三年後跨國併購的影響,則尚未有明確的結論。此結果表明台灣企業跨國併購案會對績效有短期的正向影響。 至於逐步迴歸分析的實證結果發現股權集中度與國際化程度對跨國併購後績效有正向影響;而併購發生年度常會對併購後績效有負向的影響。其中股權集中度愈高,會提高併購後第一年至第三年的績效,顯示股東會對跨國併購案投注較多關注,避免跨國併購案對企業產生負面效果。而國際化程度可以提高跨國併購後第一年的績效。此外,1998年與2001年發生的跨國併購案,在併購後表現都明顯較差,可以發現國際情勢對於跨國併購會產生重大影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This research uses SDC database to find out the cross-border M&A cases in Taiwan between 1997 and 2006, then uses TEJ database to select the listed companies in Taiwan. The sample consists of 45 companies with 62 cross-border M&A cases. And then, uses factor analysis to measure the performance. The results of factor analysis are then used as dependent variables to implement multiple regression analysis to understand the impact factor of the performance of cross-border M&A.
First, we use factor analysis to combine 11 financial indicators. The empirical results show that the performance of first year after M&A improves dramatically, better than the year before M&A. The influence continues to the second year. It’s still better than before. However, in this research, the influence is not clear in the third year and after. These results show that cross-border M&As in Taiwan have short-term impact on companies’ financial performance. There have positive influence on the first and second year of M&A. Second, we conduct stepwise regression procedure to find out the impact factors of cross-border M&A. The empirical results show that ownership concentration and the degree of internationalization have positive impact on post-merger performance, but the economic situations of the year in which the M&A take place sometimes have negative influence of post-merger performance. Ownership concentration can enhance post-merger performance from the first year after M&A to the third year. The degree of internationalization enhances the performance of the first year after M&A. However, the cross-border M&As which take place in 1998 and 2001 have worse performance than other years. It is realized that the international economic situation have major impact on cross-border M&As. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:40:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97724045-1.pdf: 831054 bytes, checksum: 235140ec25c0147f86f441931ca29456 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I
摘要 II Abstract III 表次 IX 圖次 XII 第一章、緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究設計 3 第四節 研究範圍與限制 3 第五節 研究流程 4 第二章、文獻探討 5 第一節 併購之相關理論 5 一、併購之定義 5 二、跨國併購之定義 6 第二節 併購績效的相關研究 9 一、企業績效 9 二、併購績效 10 三、影響併購績效的相關因素 13 第三章、研究方法與設計 21 第一節 樣本與資料蒐集 21 第二節 績效衡量 23 一、事件研究法(Event-Study) 23 二、財務績效研究法 23 三、本研究採用之績效衡量方式 24 第三節 研究假設 31 一、本研究之假設 31 二、自變數之選取 35 三、假設檢定方法 36 第四章、企業跨國併購的歷史與特性 37 第一節 國外企業併購的歷史 37 第二節 台灣企業跨國併購的歷史與特性 39 一、整體情況 41 二、產業分佈 43 三、目標企業地區分佈 46 四、目標企業國家分佈 48 五、小結 50 第五章、台灣企業跨國併購績效的實證分析 51 第一節 因素分析 51 第二節 跨國併購績效實證結果分析 60 第三節 台灣企業跨國併購特性與績效的關係 64 一、多元迴歸分析 64 二、逐步迴歸分析 67 第六章、研究結論與後續建議 76 第一節 結論 76 第二節 後續研究建議 78 參考文獻 79 附錄 89 附錄一、所有樣本名單 89 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 跨國併購績效實證研究:以台灣上市公司為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Performance of Cross-Border M&A: an Empirical Study of Listed Companies in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 趙義隆,黃啟瑞 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 併購,跨國併購,併購績效, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | M&A,Cross-Border M&A,Performance of M&A, | en |
dc.relation.page | 94 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-01-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 811.58 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。