請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66506完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 杜榮瑞(Rong-Ruey Duh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Han KAO | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 高于涵 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:39:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-02-16 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-02-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-01-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Asch, S. E. 1946. Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology 41 (3): 258-290.
Balzer, W. K. 1986. Biases in the recording of performance-related information: The effects of initial impression and centrality of the appraisal task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37 (3): 329-347. Becker, G. A., and C. E. Miller. 2002. Examining contrast effects in performance appraisals: Using appropriate controls and assessing accuracy. Journal of Psychology 136 (6): 667-683. Becker, G. A., and P. Villanova. 1995. Effects of rating procedure and temporal delay on the magnitude of contrast effects in. Journal of Psychology 129 (2): 157-166. Bhattacharjee, S., M. J. Maletta, and K. K. Moreno. 2007. The cascading of contrast effects on auditors' judgments in multiple client audit environments. The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1097-1117. Brown, J. D. 2006. Social Psychology. McGraw-Hill. Buda, R. 1984. The effect of expectations, perceived purpose and rating format on performance ratings. Stevens Institute of Technology, New Jersey, USA. Feldman, J. M. (1994). On the synergy between theory and application: Social cognition and performance appraisal. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 339-397). Lawrence Erlbaum. Jones, K., S. Hunt, and C. Chen. 2008. Auditors’ performance evaluations: An experimental analysis of the effects of initial impressions and task-specific experience on information later recalled. Accounting Forum 32 (3): 213-224. Jones, K. T. 2001. Auditors' performance evaluations: An analysis of the potential for cognitive biases and the effects of time pressure and experience. University of Kentucky, Kentucky, USA. Kelley, H. H. 1950. The warm-cold variable in first impressions of persons. Journal of Personality 18 (4): 431-438. Kravitz, D. A., and W. K. Balzer. 1992. Context effects in performance appraisal: A methodological critique and empirical study. Journal of Applied Psychology 77 (1): 24-31. Maurer, T. J., and R. A. Alexander. 1991. Contrast effects in behavioral measurement: An investigation of alternative process explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (1): 3-10. Maurer, T. J., J. K. Palmer, and D. K. Ashe. 1993. Diaries, checklists, evaluations, and contrast effects in measurement of behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (2): 226-231. Murphy, K. R., W. K. Balzer, M. C. Lockhart, and E. J. Eisenman. 1985. Effects of previous performance on evaluations of present performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 70 (1): 72-84. Palmer, J. K., and J. M. Feldman. 2005. Accountability and need for cognition effects on contrast, halo, and accuracy in performance ratings. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 139 (2): 119 - 138. Palmer, J. K., T. J. Maurer, and J. M. Feldman. 2002. Context and prior impression effects on attention, judgment standards, and ratings: Contrast effects revisited. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32 (12): 2575-2597. Pennington, D. C. 2000. Social Cognition: Routledge. Smither, J. W., R. R. Reilly, and R. Buda. 1988. Effect of prior performance information on ratings of present performance: Contrast versus assimilation revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (3): 487-496. Stapel, D. A., and W. Koomen. 1998. Interpretation versus reference framing: Assimilation and contrast effects in the organizational domain. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76 (2): 132-148. Sumer, H. C., and P. A. Knight. 1996. Assimilation and contrast effects in performance ratings: Effects of rating the previous performance on rating subsequent performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (4): 436-442. 丁志達. 2003. 績效管理: 揚智文化事業股份有限公司. 張淑華. 2009. 社會認知科學概論: 光明日報出版社. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66506 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討情境與初始印象對績效評估的影響,研究主題有三:(1)主管在評估多位部屬的績效時,是否會受到評估情境的影響,產生對比效果;(2)主管對部屬的初始印象,是否會影響主管對該部屬的績效評估;(3)主管對部屬的初始印象,是否能調節對比效果。
本研究採3(前一位部屬表現好、沒有前一位部屬的表現資料、前一位部屬表現差)× 3(對後一位部屬有好的初始印象、沒有後一位部屬的初始印象資料、對後一位部屬有差的初始印象)之受試者間操弄設計,以132位EMBA學生為受試者,要求受試者依照實驗程序,評估相關資料。研究結果顯示,前一位部屬的表現情境,會對後一位部屬之績效評估結果有顯著的影響,此結果和對比效果一致;另外,對後一位部屬的初始印象,也會顯著的影響其績效評估之結果;但是情境和初始印象的交互作用不顯著,因此本研究結果無法說明初始印象能調節對比效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examines the effects of context and initial impression on the superior’s evaluation of the subordinate’s performance. In this study, the context is defined as the performance of the subordinate preceding the target subordinate (hereafter “performance of the preceding subordinate”). Adopting a 3 (good performance of the preceding subordinate, no performance information on the preceding subordinate, poor performance of the preceding subordinate) x 3 (good impression on the target subordinate, no impression information on the target subordinate, poor impression on the target subordinate) between-subjects factorial design, this study recruits 132 executive M.B.A. students as the experimental participants in which they are required to serve as the superior and to evaluate the performance of a target subordinate after reading some materials about the target subordinate, and performance information on the preceding subordinate (except for those in the control groups).
ANOVA shows that context (i.e., performance of the preceding subordinate) significantly affects the participants’ performance evaluation, which is consistent with contrast effects. The results also show that initial impression on the target subordinate has a significant effect on the participants’ performance evaluation. But the interaction between context and initial impression is not significant, suggesting that initial impression cannot mitigate contrast effects. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:39:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98722036-1.pdf: 302185 bytes, checksum: 88a3c16aa089b6008518ab54d15174e7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract ii 目錄 iii 圖目錄 iv 表目錄 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 論文結構及研究流程 3 第二章 文獻回顧與研究假說 5 第一節 對比效果與相關研究 5 第二節 初始印象 14 第三節 初始印象對於對比效果之調節 17 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 實驗設計與研究變數 20 第二節 實驗程序 29 第三節 受試者 32 第四章 研究結果與分析 35 第一節 操弄檢查 35 第二節 敘述統計 37 第三節 假設檢定 39 第五章 結論、研究限制與未來建議 44 第一節 結論 44 第二節 研究限制 46 第三節 未來研究建議 47 參考文獻 48 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 初始印象 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 績效評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 對比效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情境 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | contrast effects | en |
| dc.subject | initial impression | en |
| dc.subject | context | en |
| dc.subject | performance evaluation | en |
| dc.title | 情境與初始印象對績效評估之影響-實驗研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Effects of Context and Initial Impression on Performance Evaluation: An Experimental Study | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許文馨,顏信輝 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 情境,初始印象,對比效果,績效評估, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | context,initial impression,contrast effects,performance evaluation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 49 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-01-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 295.1 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
