請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66360完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 顏厥安(Chueh-An Yen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pin-Wei Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳品維 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:31:56Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-02-13 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-02-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-02-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、英文文獻
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4 ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5 ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub. Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Bertolote, J. (2008). The roots of the concept of mental health. World Psychiatry, 7(2), 113-116. Bickenbach, J. (2017). WHO’s Definition of Health: Philosophical Analysis. In Schramme, T. and Edwards, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine (pp. 961-974). Bracken, P. and Thomas, P. (2010). From Szasz to Foucault: On the role of critical psychiatry. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 17(3), 219-228. Buchanan, D. R. (2008). Autonomy, Paternalism, and Justice: Ethical Priorities in Public Health. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 15-21. Chadwick, R. (2017). Normality as Convention and as Scientific Fact. In Schramme, T. and Edwards, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine (pp. 17-28). Chesney, E., Goodwin, G. M. and Fazel, S. (2014). Risks of all‐cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta‐review. World Psychiatry, 13(2), 153-160. Childress, J. F. (2015). Public Health and Civil Liberties: Resolving Conflicts. In Arras, J. D., Fenton, E. and Kukla, R. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Bioethics (pp. 325-338). New York: Routledge. Childress, J. F., Faden, R. R., Gaare, R. D., Gostin, L. O., Kahn, J., Bonnie, R. J., Kass, N. E., Mastroianni, A. C., Moreno, J. D. and Nieburg, P. (2002). Public Health Ethics: Mapping the Terrain. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30(2), 170-178. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2014). General Comment No 1. Coppock, V. and Hopton, J. (2000). Critical perspectives on mental health. Routledge. Daniels, N. (2011). Equity and population health: toward a broader bioethics agenda. In Dawson, A. (Ed.), Public Health Ethics: Key Concepts and Issues in Policy and Practice (pp. 191-210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dawson, A. and Verweij, M. (2007). The Meaning of ‘Public’ in ‘Public Health’. In Dawson, A. and Verweij, M. F. (Eds.), Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health (pp. 13-29). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Düber, D. (2015). The Concept of Paternalism. In Schramme, T. (Ed.), New Perspectives on Paternalism and Health Care (pp. 31-45). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Dworkin, G. (2014). Paternalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/paternalism/ Feinberg, J. (1971). Legal Paternalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1(1), 105-124. doi:10.1080/00455091.1971.10716012 Ferguson, I. (2017). Politics of the Mind : Marxism and Mental Distress. London: Bookmarks Publications. Freeman, M. and Pathare, S. (2005). WHO resource book on mental health, human rights and legislation. Geneva: World Health Organization. Gooding, P. (2013). Supported Decision-Making: A Rights-Based Disability Concept and its Implications for Mental Health Law. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(3), 431-451. doi:10.1080/13218719.2012.711683 Gostin, L. O. and Gostin, K. G. (2009). A broader liberty: J.S. Mill, paternalism and the public's health. Public health, 123(3), 214-221. Gostin, L. O. and Stone, L. (2007). Health of the People: The Highest Law? In Dawson, A. and Verweij, M. F. (Eds.), Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health (pp. 59-77). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Gostin, L. O. and Wiley, L. F. (2016). Public health law: power, duty, restraint. University of California Press. Heinz, A., Friedel, E., Krüger, H.-P. and Wackerhagen, C. (2017). Philosophical Implications of Changes in the Classification of Mental Disorders in DSM-5. In Schramme, T. and Edwards, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine (pp. 1025-1040). Hockney, D. (2004, 1. June). Smoking is my choice. The Guardian. Hockney, D. (2007, 15. May). I smoke for my mental health. The Guardian. Holland, S. (2009). Public Health Paternalism—A Response to Nys. Public Health Ethics, 2(3), 285-293. doi:10.1093/phe/php016 Holland, S. (2015). Public Health Ethics (Second edition. ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press. Human Rights Council. (2017). Mental health and human rights. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G17/021/32/PDF/G1702132.pdf?OpenElement Hunt, P. and Backman, G. (2008). Health Systems and the Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health. Health and Human Rights, 10(1), 81-92. doi:10.2307/20460089 Husak, D. (2015). Paternalism and Consent. In Schramme, T. (Ed.), New Perspectives on Paternalism and Health Care (pp. 67-86). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Husak, D. (2005). Legal Paternalism. In LaFollette, H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics (pp. 387-412). Oxford University Press. Hyman, S. E. (2005). Addiction: a Disease of Learning and Memory. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(8), 1414-22. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1414 Jennings, B. (2007). Public Health and Civic Republicanism: Toward an Alternative Framework for Public Health Ethics. In Dawson, A. and Verweij, M. F. (Eds.), Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health (pp. 30-58). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Kant, I. (1999). Metaphysical Elements of Justice: Part I of the Metaphysics of Morals (Ladd, J., Trans. 2 ed.). Hackett Publishing. Kukla, R. (2015). Medicalization, “Normal Function,” and the Definition of Health. In Arras, J. D., Fenton, E. and Kukla, R. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Bioethics (pp. 515-530). New York: Routledge. Leshner, A. I. (1997). Addiction is a Brain Disease, and it Matters. Science, 278(5335), 45-47. Levy, N. (2013). Addiction is not a Brain Disease (and it Matters). Frontiers in Psychiatry, 4, 1-7. Lupton, D. (1995). The Imperative of Health: Public Health and the Regulated Body: Sage. Martens, A. (2015). Paternalism in Psychiatry: Anorexia Nervosa, Decision-Making Capacity, and Compulsory Treatment. In Schramme, T. (Ed.), New Perspectives on Paternalism and Health Care (pp. 183-199). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Matthews, E. (2000). Autonomy and the Psychiatric Patient. Journal of applied philosophy, 59-70. Matthews, E. (2017). Mind-Brain Dualism and Its Place in Mental Health Care. In Schramme, T. and Edwards, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine (pp. 345-358). Midtgaard, S. F. (2015). Paternalism, Public Health Ethics, and Equality. World Political Science, 11(2), 405-420. Mill, J. S. (2003). On Liberty. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Nordenfelt, L. (2007). The concepts of health and illness revisited. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 10(1), 5-10. Nys, T. (2008). Paternalism in Public Health Care. Public Health Ethics, 1(1), 64-72. Nys, T. (2009). Public Health Paternalism: Continuing the Dialogue. Public Health Ethics, 2(3), 294-298. doi:10.1093/phe/php028 Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2008). Fact Sheet No. 31, The Right to Health. Geneva: United Nations. Pope, T. M. (2005). Is Public Health Paternalism Really Never Justified-A Response to Joel Feinberg. Oklahoma City Law Review, 30, 121-207. Porter, D. (2005). Health, Civilization and the State: a history of public health from ancient to modern times. Routledge. Powers, M. and Faden, R. (2006). Social justice : the moral foundations of public health and health policy. New York: Oxford University Press. Rogers, W. A. (1999). Menopause: Is This a Disease and Should We Treat It? In Donchin, A. and Purdy, L. (Eds.), Embodying bioethics: recent feminist advances. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham (pp. 203-217). Schöne-Seifert, B. (2015). Paternalism: Its Ethical Justification in Medicine and Psychiatry. In Schramme, T. (Ed.), New Perspectives on Paternalism and Health Care (pp. 145-161). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Schramme, T. (2015). Introduction. In Schramme, T. (Ed.), New Perspectives on Paternalism and Health Care (pp. 1-14). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Schramme, T. (2017). Health as Notion in Public Health. In Schramme, T. and Edwards, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine (pp. 975-984). Schramme, T. (2017). Subjective and Objective Accounts of Well-Being and Quality of Life. In Schramme, T. and Edwards, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine (pp. 159-168). Seeskin, K. (2008). Plato and the origin of mental health. International journal of law and psychiatry, 31(6), 487-494. Sen, A. (2008). Why and How Is Health a Human Right? The Lancet, 372(9655), 2010. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61784-5 Stoljar, D. (2015). Physicalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dualism/ UN. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). (2000). General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12 of the Covenant). Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838d0.html UN General Assembly. (1966). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. UN General Assembly. (1991). Principles for the Protection of Persons With Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care. Voigt, K. (2015). Paternalism and Equality. In Schramme, T. (Ed.), New Perspectives on Paternalism and Health Care (pp. 87-99). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Volkow, N. D. and Fowler, J. S. (2000). Addiction, a disease of compulsion and drive: involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 318-325. Wakefield, J. C. (1992). The concept of mental disorder: on the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist, 47(3), 373. Wakefield, J. C. (2007). The concept of mental disorder: diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry, 6(3), 149. Wakefield, J. C. (2017). Mental Disorders as Genuine Medical Conditions. In Schramme, T. and Edwards, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine (pp. 65-82). Watters, C. (2012). Mental Health and Illness as Human Rights Issues. In Dudley, M., Silove, D. and Gale, F. (Eds.), Mental Health and Human Rights: vision, praxis, and courage. Oxford University Press. Weller, P. (2012). New law and ethics in mental health advance directives: The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and the right to choose. Routledge. White, M. D. (2012). Paternalism, Moralism, and Markets. In Gaus, G. F. and D'Agostino, F. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy (pp. 788-799). Routledge. Wilson, J. (2015). Why It’s Time to Stop Worrying About Paternalism in Health Policy. In Schramme, T. (Ed.), New Perspectives on Paternalism and Health Care (pp. 203-219). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Winslow, C. E. (1920). The Untilled Fields of Public Health. Science (New York, N.Y.), 51(1306), 23. doi:10.1126/science.51.1306.23 Wolff, J. (2012). The Human Right to Health. WW Norton & Company. Wolff, J. (2015). The Content of the Human Right to Health Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. World Health Organization. (2003). Mental health legislation and human rights. Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2005). Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World. Geneva: WHO. World Health Organization. (2018). Mental health: strengthening our response. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response Wu, C. F. (2016). The Emergence of the Right to Health in Taiwan: Transplantation from the West and Its Implementation. In Lo, C. f., Li, N. N. T. and Lin, T. Y. (Eds.), Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order (pp. 199-214). Springer. Zamir, E. and Medina, B. (2010). Legal Paternalism Law, Economics, and Morality (pp. 313-347). Oxford University Press. 二、德文文獻 Bielefeldt, H. (2016). Der Menschenrechtsansatz im Gesundheitswesen. Einige Grundsatzüberlegungen. In Frewer, A. and Bielefeldt, H. (Hrsg.), Das Menschenrecht auf Gesundheit: Normative Grundlagen und aktuelle Diskurse (pp. 19-56). transcript Verlag. Buyx, A. (2010). Können, sollen, müssen? Public Health-Politik und libertärer Paternalismus. Ethik in der Medizin, 22(3), 221-234. 三、中文文獻 Hughes, J.（2019），〈英國《心智能力法》的法律架構、司法及臨床實務運作〉，收於：陳炳仁（編），《心智能力受損者之自主及人權：醫療、法律與社會的對話》，頁3-18，臺北市：元照。 Hughes, J.（2019），〈《心智能力法》相關之教育訓練與社會推廣─英國經驗〉，收於：陳炳仁（編），《心智能力受損者之自主及人權：醫療、法律與社會的對話》，頁99-115，臺北市：元照。 Jamison, K. R.（著），易之新（譯）（2000），《夜，驟然而降 : 了解自殺》，臺北市：天下遠見。 世界卫生组织西太平洋区域办事处（2014），《预防自杀：全球要务》，马尼拉：世卫组织西太平洋区域办事处。 江東亮、鄭雅文（2007），〈公共衛生的歷史〉，收於：財團法人陳拱北預防醫學基金會（編），《公共衛生學．上冊》，頁15-46，臺北市：陳拱北預防醫學基金會出版。 吳全峰（2013），〈從經濟社會文化權利國際公約論健康人權與健康平等—兼論全民健康保險給付機制之健康人權困境〉，收於：蘇宏達、陳淳文（編），《中華民國施行聯合國兩權利公約的意義：接軌國際，深化民主》，頁197-250，台灣：台灣民主基金會。 吳建昌（2018），〈神經精神醫學、民事能力與治理─以失智症患者為例〉，收於：蔡友月、陳嘉新（編），《不正常的人？台灣精神醫學與現代性的治理》，頁414-456，新北市：聯經出版事業股份有限公司。 李舒中（2018），〈妄想、主體性與精神病房─思覺失調（精神分裂）的臨床民族誌研究〉，收於：蔡友月、陳嘉新（編），《不正常的人？台灣精神醫學與現代性的治理》，頁211-256，新北市：聯經出版事業股份有限公司。 林明昕（2006），〈健康權：以「國家之保護義務」為中心〉，氏著，《公法學的開拓線─理論、實務與體系之建構》，頁35-47，臺北市：林明昕出版。 林桂卉（2018），〈拼裝醫療化─台灣精神醫學的自殺防治論述與實作〉，收於：蔡友月、陳嘉新（編），《不正常的人？台灣精神醫學與現代性的治理》，頁347-382，新北市：聯經出版事業股份有限公司。 林淑容（2018），〈身體、意象與變異的自我感─精神分裂症患者的主體經驗〉，收於：蔡友月、陳嘉新（編），《不正常的人？台灣精神醫學與現代性的治理》，頁167-210，新北市：聯經出版事業股份有限公司。 洪晨碩（2018），〈跨越診間的失智診斷與照顧工作〉，收於：蔡友月、陳嘉新（編），《不正常的人？台灣精神醫學與現代性的治理》，頁127-164，新北市：聯經出版事業股份有限公司。 張如杏（2016），〈心理衛生政策與福利行政〉，氏著，《精神醫療社會工作理論與實務 : 兼述心理衛生社會工作》，頁21-33，臺北市：洪葉文化。 張珏（2007），〈公共心理衛生〉，收於：財團法人陳拱北預防醫學基金會（編），《公共衛生學．中冊》，頁367-392，臺北市：陳拱北預防醫學基金會出版。 張珏、李柏翰、溫桂君、張菊惠（2015），〈國際人權法與心理健康權〉，《中華心理衛生學刊》，28卷3期，頁449-468。 張珏、張菊惠（2013），《心理健康與人權：檢視兩人權公約的健康指標》，法務部委託研究計畫成果報告，計畫編號：S1020319。 許育典（2018），《憲法》，八版，臺北市：元照。 游正名、楊添圍、周仁宇、許欣偉、盧慧華、陳喬琪、胡維恆（2005），〈精神鑑定結論與法院裁判認定間不一致現象之分析（第一報）：犯行時之精神狀態〉，《臺灣精神醫學》，19卷3期，頁225-236。 湯家碩（2018），〈龍發堂與台灣現代精神醫療，1980-1990〉，收於：蔡友月、陳嘉新（編），《不正常的人？台灣精神醫學與現代性的治理》，頁459-503，新北市：聯經出版事業股份有限公司。 黃清華（2015），〈健康權再認識─論健康權的民事、社會和政治權利屬性〉，《醫事法學》，22卷1期，頁19-47。 黃嵩立、黃怡碧（2019），〈《身心障礙者權利公約》之落實與社會推廣─臺灣經驗〉，收於：陳炳仁（編），《心智能力受損者之自主及人權：醫療、法律與社會的對話》，頁149-170，臺北市：元照。 黃詩淳（2019），〈臺灣之監護制度與其他代理決策制度：從身心障礙者權利公約之觀點出發〉，收於：陳炳仁（編），《心智能力受損者之自主及人權：醫療、法律與社會的對話》，頁57-78，臺北市：元照。 楊添圍（2018），〈精神鑑定、治療介入與國家犯罪治理〉，收於：蔡友月、陳嘉新（編），《不正常的人？台灣精神醫學與現代性的治理》，頁385-412，新北市：聯經出版事業股份有限公司。 蔡友月、陳嘉新（2018），〈不正常的人？精神醫學與人文社會科學的跨界、交流與反思〉，收於：蔡友月、陳嘉新（編），《不正常的人？台灣精神醫學與現代性的治理》，頁21-78，新北市：聯經出版事業股份有限公司。 鄧衍森（1998），〈從國際人權法論健康權之法理基礎與實踐方式〉，《東吳法律學報》，11卷1期，頁55-72。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66360 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在現代國家的治理之下，對於個人心理狀態的判斷被認為是屬於專家的知識範圍。縱然在國際人權法與健康權的相關論述中皆對個人自主的重要性有所強調，惟個人對於自身的主觀感受大多時候仍舊未被看重。也因為如此，在與行使個人自由相關的心理狀態判斷中，個人並未擁有一個對於自身心理狀態進行判斷的權利─或者說這個權利在國家法律與精神醫學權威的交互運作下遭到了壓抑。
然而，何以個人對於自身心理狀態不具有由個人主觀感受來加以判斷的權利？現代國家的運作中，對於權利的限制必須說明其正當性。本文欲指出的即是公共衛生如何作為公益，以及法律與公共衛生政策在對於人民心理健康的治理層面中所展現出的家長主義傾向，並以此作為限制個人對自身心理狀態進行判斷的理由。惟透過對於家長主義之定義與正當性條件的闡釋，我們可以發現國家與其所授予權威者在心理狀態的判斷上並非一律具有獨占該判斷權利的正當性。 本文主張應將心理健康理解為一具有實踐意義的概念，其係由生物、社會性因素以及個人主觀感受所共同構成。當專家無法藉由生物、社會性因素對於個人的心理狀態給出一確切判斷時，國家即不得繼續以家長主義式的理由來限制以個人主觀感受來判斷自身的心理狀態。此時，個人即得以主張心理健康的自我判斷權來以自身的感受來判斷自己的心理健康，並藉此排除國家以其心理健康為名對其個人自由所作出的侵害。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Under the governance of modern states, the assessment of mental state is regarded as an area of expertise. Even though the importance of personal autonomy is emphasized in the discourse of international human rights law and right to health, the subjective feelings of an individual are still overlooked most of the time. Thus, when it comes to the assessment of mental state related to the exercise of personal freedom, an individual does not have the right to assess their own mental state, or we could say the right is inhibited under the interaction of the authority of law and psychiatry.
However, why does an individual not have the right to assess their own mental state using their subjective feelings? Under the operation of modern states, any inhibition of rights needs to be legitimated. This thesis aims to point out how public health serves as a public interest and the paternalistic tendency of law and public policies in governing people’s mental health. They are both used as reasons to restrict an individual’s right to assess their own mental state. Yet through the interpretation of the definition and the justification condition of paternalism, we could find that the state and other authorities granted by it do not always have the legitimacy to monopolize the right to assess one’s mental state. I argue that mental health should be understood as a concept with practical meaning that consists of biological and social elements, and one’s own subjective feelings. When experts could not give a definite assessment of an individual’s mental state based on biological and social elements, the state should not continue using paternalistic reasons to restrict an individual’s assessment of their own mental state using their subjective feelings. An individual could then claim the right to self-assessment and assess their own mental state using their subjective feelings and keep the state from violating their personal freedom even if the state asserts that the violation is for the good of their mental health. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:31:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R05a21005-1.pdf: 1238750 bytes, checksum: 080dae8391d060881531aeca73277301 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 問題意識 1 第二節 研究範圍與限制 2 第三節 論文架構 3 第二章 何謂健康與心理健康 5 第一節 健康的概念 6 第一款 健康概念的複雜性 6 第二款 健康概念的不同定義與其目的 8 第三款 具有實踐意義的健康概念 11 第二節 心理健康的概念 13 第一款 心理健康的概念史 13 第二款 醫學上的標準及其爭議 16 第三款 自我判斷心理健康的重要性與可能性 20 第三章 心理健康與健康權 23 第一節 健康權的內涵 23 第一款 國際人權法上的健康權 25 第二款 我國憲法學說與釋憲實務上的健康權 28 第二節 健康權論述中的心理健康 32 第一款 國際人權法上的焦點：以自主性保障為中心的觀察 33 第一項 《身權公約》中關於自主性的保障 35 第二項 《身權公約》中的障礙概念 38 第三項 心理健康的自我詮釋權 39 第四項 小結 42 第二款 心理健康人權在台灣 44 第三節 現實上心理健康自我判斷權的欠缺 46 第四章 公共衛生作為限制心理健康自我判斷權之公益 48 第一節 公共衛生的概念與目的 49 第一款 緒論 49 第二款 管制性的公共衛生概念 51 第三款 從管制到身體的治理 54 第四款 小結 57 第二節 公共衛生的正當性基礎 58 第一款 緒論 58 第二款 效益主義 60 第三款 自由主義 63 第四款 社群／共和主義 66 第五款 社會正義 69 第六款 小結：公共衛生作為公共利益 71 第三節 公共衛生與心理健康 72 第一款 緒論 72 第二款 國家的心理健康政策與制度 73 第三款 國家治理下的心理健康 78 第四款 小結：心理健康圖象中的家長主義 81 第五章 掙脫家長主義？心理健康的自我判斷權 83 第一節 家長主義 83 第一款 緒論 83 第二款 家長主義的定義 85 第三款 家長主義的正當性 89 第二節 法律家長主義與公共衛生家長主義 94 第一款 緒論 94 第二款 法律家長主義 95 第三款 公共衛生家長主義 99 第四款 小結：共同的難題 103 第三節 心理健康自我判斷權之限制正當性 106 第一款 緒論 106 第二款 柔性家長主義的限制 107 第三款 心理狀態的判斷權利 111 第四款 家長主義之外… 116 第四節 小結：心理健康的自我判斷空間 117 第六章 結論 122 參考文獻 125 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 心理健康 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公共衛生 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家長主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我判斷權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自主性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 健康權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | mental health | en |
| dc.subject | public health | en |
| dc.subject | paternalism | en |
| dc.subject | right to self-assessment | en |
| dc.subject | autonomy | en |
| dc.subject | right to health | en |
| dc.title | 心理健康的自我判斷權 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Right to Self-assess Mental State | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳建昌(Chien-Chang Wu),邱文聰(Wen-Tsong Chiou) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 心理健康,健康權,自主性,自我判斷權,家長主義,公共衛生, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | mental health,right to health,autonomy,right to self-assessment,paternalism,public health, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 136 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000398 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-109-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.21 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。