請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66162
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 柯承恩 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Zhu Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳禹竹 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:24:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-06-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-05-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 英文參考文獻
Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 'Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements.' Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23, (2004): 69-87. Andrews, K. R. 'Directors Responsibility for Corporate-Strategy.' Harvard Business Review 58, no. 6 (1980): 30-&. baysinger, B. D. and H. N. Butler. 'Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition.' Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15, (1985): 72-87. Berle, A. A. and G. C. Means. 'The Modern Corporation and Private Property.' New York: Macmillan, (1932). Boyd, B. K. 'Ceo Duality and Firm Performance - a Contingency-Model.' Strategic Management Journal 16, no. 4 (1995): 301-312. Daily, C. M., D. R. Dalton, and A. A. Cannella. 'Introduction to Special Topic Forum Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data.' Academy of Management Review 28, no. 3 (2003): 371-382. Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, J. L. Johnson, and A. E. Ellstrand. 'Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis.' Academy of Management Journal 42, no. 6 (1999): 674-686. Davidson, W. N., Xie, B., & Xu, W. 'Market Reaction to Voluntary Announcements of Audit Committee Appointments: The Effect of Financial Expertise.' Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23, (2004): 279-293. Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson. 'Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management.' Academy of Management Review 22, no. 1 (1997): 20-47. Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis. 'Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: Ceo Governance and Shareholder Returns.' Australian Journal of Management 16, (1991): 49-64. Eisenhardt, K. M. 'Control - Organizational and Economic Approaches.' Management Science 31, no. 2 (1985): 134-149. Fahlenbrach, R., A. Low, and R. M. Stulz. 'Why Do Firms Appoint Ceos as Outside Directors?' Journal of Financial Economics 97, no. 1 (2010): 12-32. Fama, E. and M. C. Jensen. 'Separation of Ownership and Control.' Journal of Law & Economics 26, (1983): 301-325. Fama, E. F. 'Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.' Journal of Political Economy 88, no. 2 (1980): 288-307. Forbes, D. P. and F. J. Milliken. 'Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups.' Academy of Management Review 24, (1999): 489-505. Govindarajan, V. 'Implementing Competitive Strategies at the Business Unit Level - Implications of Matching Managers to Strategies.' Strategic Management Journal 10, no. 3 (1989): 251-269. Groves, R. M. 'Survey Errors and Survey Costs.' New York: Wiley, (1989). Hillman, A. J. 'Politicians on the Board of Directors: Do Connections Affect the Bottom Line?' Journal of Management 31, no. 3 (2005): 464-481. Hillman, A. J., and T. Dalziel. 'Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives.' Academy of Management Review 28, no. 3 (2003): 383-396. Huse, M. 'Accountability and Creating Accountability: A Framework for Exploring Behavioural Perspectives of Corporate Governance.' British Journal of Management 16, (2005): S65-S79. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 'Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.' Journal of Financial Economics 3, (1976): 305-360. Johnson, J. L., C. M. Daily, and A. E. Ellstrand. 'Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda.' Journal of Management 22, no. 3 (1996): 409-438. Klein, A. 'Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure.' Journal of Law & Economics, (1998): 275-303. Kor, Y. Y., & Misangyi, V. F. . 'Outside Directors' Industry-Specific Experience and Firms' Liability of Newness.' Strategic Management Journal 29, (2008): 1345-1355. Lester, R. H., A. Hillman, A. Zardkoohi, and A. A. Cannella. 'Former Government Officials as Outside Directors: The Role of Human and Social Capital.' Academy of Management Journal 51, no. 5 (2008): 999-1013. Lorsch, J. W. and E. MacIver. 'Pawns or Potentates. The Reality of America's Corporate Boards.' Boston, MA: HBS Press, (1989). Miller, D. 'Relating Porter Business Strategies to Environment and Structure - Analysis and Performance Implications.' Academy of Management Journal 31, no. 2 (1988): 280-308. Minichilli, A., A. Zattoni, and F. Zona. 'Making Boards Effective: An Empirical Examination of Board Task Performance.' British Journal of Management 20, no. 1 (2009): 55-74. Nayyar, P. R. 'On the Measurement of Competitive Strategy - Evidence from a Large Multiproduct United-States Firm.' Academy of Management Journal 36, no. 6 (1993): 1652-1669. Pfeffer, J. 'Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and Its Environment.' Administrative Science Quarterly 17, no. 218-228 (1972). Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik. 'The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependency Perspective.' New York: Harper and Row, (1978). Porter, M. E. 'Competitive Strategy.' New York: Free Press, (1980). Provan, K. G. 'Recognizing, Measuring, and Interpreting the Potential/Enacted Power Distiction in Organizational Research.' Academy of Management Review 5, (1980): 549-560. Stiles, P. and B. Taylor. 'Boards at Work.' Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2001). Stringa, Ormanidhi Orges and Omer. 'Porter's Model of Generic Competitive Strategies.' Business Economics 43, no. 3 (2008): 55-64. Tomaksovic-Devey, D., Leiter, J., & Thompson, S. 'Organizational Survey Non-Response.' Administrative Science Quarterly 39, no. 3 (1994): 439-457. Ward, P. T., and R. Duray. 'Manufacturing Strategy in Context: Environment, Competitive Strategy and Manufacturing Strategy.' Journal of Operations Management 18, no. 2 (2000): 123-138. Wim A. Van der Stede, S. Mark Young, Clara Xiaoling Chen. 'Assessing the Quality of Evidence in Empirical Management Accounting Research: The Case of Survey Studies.' Accounting Organizations and Society 30, no. 655-684 (2005). Winlund, Gabrielsson Jonas and Henrik. 'Boards of Directors in Small and Medium-Sized Industrial Firms: Examining the Effects of the Board's Working Style on Board Task Performance.' Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal 12, no. 4 (2000): 311-330. Withers, M. C., A. J. Hillman, and A. A. Cannella. 'A Multidisciplinary Review of the Director Selection Literature.' Journal of Management 38, no. 1 (2012): 243-277. Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt. 'Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Role of the Board and the Audit Committee.' Journal of Corporate Finance 9, no. 3 (2003): 295-316. Yeh, Y. H.., P. G. Shu, and S. B. Chiu. 'Whose Control Matters? Evidence from Target Firms of Acquisitions.' European Financial Management Association 2003 Conference, Helsinki, Finland, (2003). Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce. 'Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance - a Review and Integrative Model.' Journal of Management 15, no. 2 (1989): 291-334. Zona, F., and A. Zattoni. 'Beyond the Black Box of Demography: Board Processes and Task Effectiveness within Italian Firms.' Corporate Governance-an International Review 15, no. 5 (2007): 852-864. 中文參考文獻 丁秀儀. '公司獨立董事為何忙碌.' 管理學報 21, no. 3 (2010): 291-318. 方俊儒、李秀英、龍春伶. '獨立董監事對公司績效與盈餘品質之影響--控制股東之調節效果.' 會計與公司治理 5, no. 1 (2008): 55-80. 朱倩瑩. '應計品質與獨立董監事專業知識背景的關係.' 國立台灣大學管理學院會計學研究所碩士論文, (2007). 林秀柑、方文碩、王冠閔. '集團核心企業董事會特性與經營績效之研究.' 台灣企業績效學刊 3, no. 1 (2009): 23-48. 邱垂昌、張裕任、郭麗雪. '強制設置獨立董監事與新股折價關聯性之研究.' 會計評論 45, (2007): 97-134. 邱垂昌、黃秀姿. '自願設立獨立董事、關係人交易與公司價值關聯性之研究:代理理論與訊號發射理論之比較.' Asian Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences 1, no. 3 (2006): 379-403. 柯承恩、葉銀華. '公司治理研究報告.' 台北:財團法人中華公司治理協會, (2002). 陳一如. '企業組織型態與董事會結構對策略聯盟財富效果之影響.' 管理評論 29, no. 3 (2010): 79-102. 曾星澤. '會計財務專業背景之獨立董事與訴訟風險、公司治理之關聯.' 中原大學 會計學系 碩士學位論文, (2010). 黃銘傑. '公司治理與董監民事責任-以獨立董事之雙重責任為中心.' 會計研究月刊 303, (2011): 74-89. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66162 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去鮮少文獻深入探討獨立董事職能,我國與獨立董事相關之研究,多強調於獨立董事之設置與公司績效關聯性,許多學者建議未來研究應著重於董事的實際行為(e.g. Zahra and Pearce, 1989; Forbes and Miliken, 1999;Zona and Zattoni, 2007;Minichilli et al., 2009)。本研究主要目的為了解影響獨立董事各職能發揮程度之因素,依Withers(2012)所提出之供給及需求的架構,將影響因素分為獨立董事專業背景及企業競爭策略進行關聯性研究。
研究結果發現,獨立董事專業背景與企業競爭策略對獨立董事職能發揮情形皆有顯著影響。除假說驗證外,本研究另發現「財會專業」之獨立董事,在認知行為或實際行為 中,皆能高度發揮「行為控制職能」與「產出控制職能」,而「管理專業」獨立董事則在實際行為中與各職能發揮程度皆無顯著相關。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the past, there haven’t been a lot of papers discussing the function of independent directors. In Taiwan, most of the research related to independent directors has been focusing on the co-relation between the organization of independent directors and corporate performance, many academics has suggested more focus should be put upon the actual behaviors of independent directors in future researches (e.g. Zahra and Pearce, 1989; Forbes and Miliken, 1999;Zona and Zattoni, 2007;Minichilli et al., 2009). The main purpose of this research is to understand the factors that influences the performance of independent directors’ functions on the basis of Withers(2012) supply and demand structure, which investigate the co-relation between the two separate influential factors, background of independent directors and corporate competitive strategies.
The research result shows, the background of independent directors and corporate competitive strategies has significant influences on the degree of performance of independent directors’ functions. Apart from proving the hypothesis, the research found that independent directors with financial backgrounds, can highly perform the function of behavior control and output control in both cognitive behaviors and actual behaviors, and independent directors with professional management backgrounds shows insignificant co-relation with the degree of performance of independent directors in their actual behavior. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:24:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R97722049-1.pdf: 601847 bytes, checksum: c12e2b47c5cfc12c0f33173446570c69 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 ii
摘要 iii Abstract iv 第一章、前言 1 一、 研究背景 1 二、 研究目的與動機 2 三、 研究範圍 4 第二章、法規與文獻回顧 5 一、 台灣獨立董事相關法規 5 1. 獨立董事設置及職能規範 5 2. 獨立董事資格 6 二、 獨立董事職能 7 三、 獨立董事專業背景 13 四、 企業競爭策略 16 第三章、假說發展 19 一、 專業背景 19 二、 競爭策略 21 第四章、研究設計與方法 27 一、 研究對象及資料來源 27 二、 研究架構 27 三、 問卷設計 28 1. 內容設計 28 2. Non-response bias test 32 3. 問卷前測 33 4. 問卷信度分析 33 第五章、研究結果 35 一、 敘述性統計 35 1. 獨立董事背景 35 2. 企業競爭策略 37 3. 獨立董事職能(認知行為) 40 4. 獨立董事職能(實際行為) 45 二、 關聯性分析 49 1. 分析資料建構方式 49 2. 研究假說驗證及分析 49 1). 獨立董事專業與各職能發揮程度 49 2). 獨立董事專業與各職能發揮程度-其他發現 53 3). 企業競爭策略與獨立董事職能發揮程度 54 4). 企業競爭策略與獨立董事職能發揮程度-其他發現 55 第六章、結論 57 一、 研究結果彙總 57 二、 研究限制 60 三、 研究貢獻 61 附錄-統計表 62 附錄-問卷 76 英文參考文獻 84 中文參考文獻 88 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 影響獨立董事參與董事會決策因素之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of the Factors Affecting the Participation of Independence Directors in Board Decisions | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 廖芝嫻,楊孟萍 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 公司治理,獨立董事,職能,專業背景,競爭策略, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Corporate Governance,Independent Directors,Task Performance,Professional Background,Competitive Strategy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 89 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-05-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 587.74 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。