請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66143
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張惠娟(Hui-Chuan Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Ting Tseng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 曾維亭 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:23:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-18 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-07-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-05-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Albinski, Nan Bowman. “When it Changed.” Women’s Utopias in British and
American Fiction. London: Routledge, 1988. 159-86. Print. Alpert, Jane. “Mother Rights: A New Feminist Theory.” Ms. 2.2 (1973): 52-55, 88-94. MLA International Bibliography. EBSCO. Web. 15 October 2010. Andermahr, Sonya. “The Politics of Separatism and Lesbian Utopian Fiction.” New Lesbian Criticism: Literary and Cultural Readings. Ed. Sally Munt. Columbia: Columbia UP, 1992. 133-52. Print. Bammer, Angelika. “Rewriting the future: the utopian impulse in 1970s’ feminism.” Partial Visions. NY: Routeldge, 1991. 48-67. Print. ---. “World apart: utopian visions and separate spheres’ feminism.” Partial Visions. 67-93. Print. Barr, Marleen S, ed. Future Females: A Critical Anthology. Ohio: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1981. Print. ---. “Susan McKee Charnas, Sally Gearhart, and Marge Piercy Depict Sex and the Single Feminist Utopian Quasi-tribesperson.” Lost In Space. London: U of North Carolina P, 1993. 39-50. Print. Barr, Marleen S, and Nicholas D. Smith, eds. Women and Utopia. Boston: UP of America, 1983. Print. Cudworth, Erika.Introduction. Developing Ecofeminist Theory. London: Palgrave, 2005. 1-13.Print. ---. “Ecofeminism and the Question of Difference.” Developing Ecofeminist Theory. 101-119. Print. Devine, Maureen. “Woman and Nature.” Woman and Nature. London: Scarecrow Press, 1992. 31-73. Print. Diamond, Irene, and Gloria Femen Ovenstein, eds. Reweaving the World. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1980. Print. Echols, Alice. Introduction. Daring to be Bad: Radical Feminism in America 1967-1975. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1989. 3-23. Print. ---. Epilogue. Daring to be Bad: Radical Feminism in America 1967-1975. 287-99. Print. Farley, Tucker. “Realities and Fictions: Lesbian Visions of Utopia.” Rohrlich and Hoffman 233-47. Print. Ferns, Chris. Introduction. Narrating Utopia. Liverpool: Liverpool UP, 1999. 1-27. Print. Freibert, Lucy M. “World Views in Utopian Novels by Women.” Barr and Smith 67-85. Print. Firestone, Shulamith. The Dialectic of Sex. London: Women’s Press, 1979. Print. Gaard, Greta. “Living Interconnections with Animals and Nature.” Ecofeminism. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1993. 1-13. Print. Gearhart, Sally Miller. “Future Visions: Today’s Politics: Feminist Utopias in Review.” Rohrlich and Hoffman 296-310. Print. ---. The Wanderground. Boston: Alyson Publications, 1979. Print. ---. “The Future—If There Is One—Is Female.” Reweaving the Web o Life. Ed. Pam McAllister. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers, 1982. 266-84. Print. King,Ynestra. “Feminism and the Revolt of Nature.” Heresis 13(1981):12-15. MLA International Bibliography. EBSCO. Web. 30 September 2010. ---. “The Ecology of Feminism and the Feminism of Ecology.” Healing the Wounds. Philadelphia: Green Print, 1989. 18-29. Print. Kress, Susan. “In and Out of Time.” Barr 109-25. Print. Lees, Susan H. “Motherhood in Feminist Utopias.” Rohrlich and Hoffman 219-33. Print. Magarey, Susan. “Dreams and Desires: Four 1970s Feminist Visions of Utopia.” Australian Feminist Studies 22. 53 (2007): 325-41. MLA International Bibliography. EBSCO. Web. 5 May 2010. Merchant, Carolyn. “Ecofeminism and Feminist Theory.” Diamond and Ovenstein 100-06. Print. Moylan, Tom. Introduction. Demand the Impossible. NY: Methuen, 1986. 1-15. Print. ---. “The Literary Utopia.” Demand the Impossible. 29-55. Print. ---. “Marge Piercy, Woman on the Edge of Time.” Demand the Impossible.121-56. Print. ---. Conclusion. Demand the Impossible. 196-213. Print. ---. “Daring to Dream.” Scrapes of the Untainted Sky. Boulder: Westview Press, 2000. 67-84. Print. McGuire, Jane, and Cathleen McGuire. “Grass-Roots Ecofeminism: Activating Utopia.” Ecofeminist Literary Critisicm. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1998. 186-203. Print. Piercy, Marge. Woman on the Edge of Time. NY: Fawcett, 1976. Print. Plumwood, Val. Introduction. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge, 1993.1-19. Print. ---. “Feminism and Ecofeminism.” Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. 19-41. Print. Peterson, Joyce Shaw. “What to Do About Motherhood: Feminist Theory and Feminist Fiction Negotiate Motherhood’s Dilemmas.” The Literary Mother. Ed. Susan C. Staub. Jefferson: McFarland and Company, 2007. 224-45. Print. Plant, Judith, ed. Healing the Wounds. Philadelphia: Green Print, 1989. Print. ---. “Toward a New World: an Introduction.” Plant 1-4. Print. Rohrlich, Ruby, and Elaine Hoffman, eds. Women in Search of Utopia. NY: Schocken Books, 1984. Print. Russ, Joanna. “Recent Feminist Utopias.” Barr. 71-86. Print. Sturgeon, Noel. “Movements of Ecofeminism.” Ecofeminist Natures. NY: Routledge, 1997. 23-59. Print. Sargent, Lyman Tower. “A New Anarchism: Social and Political Ideas in Some Recent Feminist Eutopias.” Barr and Smith 3-34. Print. Stratton, Susan. “Intersubjectivity and Difference in Feminist Ecotopias.” FEMSPEC 31.1 (2001): 33-43. Print. Spretnak, Charlene. “Toward an Ecofeminist Spirituality.” Plant 127-33. Print. Starhawk. “Toward an Ecological-Feminist Theory of Nature.” Plant 174-89. Print. ---. “Power, Authority and, Mystery: Ecofeminism and Earth-based Spirituality.” Diamond and Ovenstein 73-87. Print. Sargisson, Lucy. “Body of Thought.” Utopian Bodies and the Politics of Transgression. New York: Routledge, 2000. 6-28. Print. ---. “The Spirit/ Matter Relation.” Contemporary Feminist Utopianism. London: Routledge, 1996. 133-69. Print. Tong, Rosemarie. “Radical Feminism: Libertarian and Cultural Perspectives.” Feminist Thought. Colorado: Westview Press, 2009. 237-68. Print. ---. “Ecofeminism.” Feminist Thought. 48-96. Print. Umansky, Lauri. “Maternal Thinking: Motherhood As Practice and Metaphor.” Motherhood Reconceived. NY: NY UP, 1996. 132-59. Print. Warren, Karen J. “What Are Ecofeminist Saying?” Ecofeminist Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000. 21-43. Print. ---. “Surviving Patriarchy” Ecofeminist Philosophy. 193-217. Print. ---. “Nature Is a Feminist Issue.” Ecofeminist Philosophy. 1-21. Print. ---. “Quilting Ecofeminist Philosophy.” Ecofeminist Philosophy. 43-73. Print. ---. “Ethics in a Fruit Bowl.” Ecofeminist Philosophy. 97-125. Print. ---. “Feminism and Ecology: Making Connections.” Environmental Ethics 9.1 (1987): 3-20. Print. Wajcman, Judy. “Male Designs on Technology.” Techno Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004. 10-32. Print. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66143 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 女性烏托邦小說是烏托邦文學的一支。具有女性主義和生態環保意識。女性烏托邦小說通常描寫一個就女性主義角度而言,比現實更為美好的社會,而這個社會也往往符合生態保育原則。本論文檢視的兩本七零年代女性烏托邦小說—瑪姬.皮兒西的《時間邊緣的女人》和莎莉.米勒.姬兒哈的《漫遊地》—同樣具備此等對女性主義和生態環境議題的關切。然而,透過生態女性主義視角的檢視,這兩本小說在性別、性靈和生育上的刻畫卻有絕大的不同。《時間邊緣的女人》描寫一個沒有性別差異的社會,就中,大多數的女人淡化她們和自然間的連結。此外,女性的生育能力也被視為是一種包袱。《漫遊地》則保存了性別差異,榮耀女人獨具的靈性,並視女性生育能力為一股神聖的力量。此些歧異在在揭露了兩位作者分歧的女性主義觀點:《時間邊緣的女人》體現了皮兒西的激進女性主義觀,而《漫遊地》則實現姬兒哈的生態女性思想。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Feminist utopia is a subgenre in the domain of utopian literature which, informed by feminist and ecological insights, often describes societies better in feminist terms and consonant with ecological principles. The two 1970s feminist utopias under scrutiny, Marge Piercy’s Woman on the Edge of Time and Sally Miller Gearhart’s The Wanderground, demonstrate similar feminist and ecological concerns. Despite their shared concerns, the two nevertheless differ in their treatment of gender, spirituality and reproduction, when examined through an ecofeminist lens. Woman on the Edge of Time depicts a community where gender difference does not exist, where most women loosen their spiritual connection with nature, and where women’s reproductive power is taken to be a burden. The Wanderground, on the other hand, preserves gender difference, honors women’s spirituality and deems women’s reproductive power to be sacred. These differences uncover the two authors’ divergent feminist ideologies: Woman on the Edge of Time embodies many of Piercy’s radical libertarian thoughts while The Wanderground realizes many of Gearhart’s ecofeminist beliefs. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:23:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R97122006-1.pdf: 824765 bytes, checksum: 788f5062184c79ed18ccf605546df6b0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
Introduction 1 Feminist Utopian Fiction 1 Ecofeminist philosophy 5 The Structure of the Thesis 11 Chapter One Gender 16 Ecofeminist Discourse on Gender 17 Sexual Difference: Androgynous or Feminine? 19 Gender relationship: Deconstructing the Dualistic Pattern 29 Chapter Two Spirituality 39 Ecofeminist Discourse on Spirituality 39 Spiritual Practices 41 Immanence 50 Chapter Three Reproduction 57 Ecofeminist discourse on Reproduction 57 Reproduction 60 Motherhood 67 Conclusion 79 Works Cited 82 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 女性與自然:兩本女性烏托邦小說的探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Women and Nature: A Study of Two Feminist Utopias | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李欣穎(Hsin-Ying Li),黃毓秀(Yu-Hsiu Huang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 女性烏托邦小說,生態女性主義,性別,性靈,生育, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | feminist utopia,ecofeminism,gender,spirituality,reproduction, | en |
dc.relation.page | 86 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-05-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 外國語文學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 805.43 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。