請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66011完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭斯傑(Sy-Jye Guo) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Quang-Khoi Nguyen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 阮光魁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:18:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-06-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-06-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-06-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Adams, Stephen, “Risk Management Plan,” (November 19, 2007)
2. Chapman, Chris, “Project risk analysis and management – PRAM the generic process,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 15, Issue 5, pp. 273-281 (1997). 3. Choudhry, Rafiq M., and Iqbal, Khurram. “Identification of Risk Management System in Construction Industry in Pakistan,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, (2012) 4. Enshassi, Adnan, and Mosa, Jaser Abu, “Risk Management in Building Projects: Owners’ Perspective,” The Islamic University Journal (Series of Natural Studies and Engineering) (2008) 5. Garrett, Darell, “The Owner’s Perspective in Construction Management,” ViaNovus Inc. 6. Greene, Jennifer, Stellman, Andrew, “Head First PMP, 2nd Edition,” Chapter 11. 7. Jutte, Bart, “10 Golden Rules of Project Risk Management,” Project smart.co.uk. 8. Hillson, David (1999), “Developing Effective Risk Response,” Proceeding of the 30th Annual Project Management Institute 1999 Seminar & Symposium Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (1999). 9. Kontio, Jyrki and Basili, Victor R., “Risk Knowledge Capture in the Riskit Method,” 10. Luce, Robert Duncan, and Raiffa, Howard, “Game and Decisions,” (1989). 11. Myerson, Roger B., “Game Theory Analysis of Conflict,” 12. Poulter, Susan R., “Monte Carlo Simulation in Environmental Risk Assessment – Science, Policy and Legal Issues,” 13. Raftery, John, “Risk Analysis in Project Management,” E&FN Spon book, pp 4-23 (1993). 14. Raz, T. and Michael, E., “Use and benefits of tools for project risk management,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 9-17 (2000). 15. Raz, Tzvi and Hillson, David, “A Comparative Review of Risk Management Standards,” Risk management: An International Journal, 7(4), 53-66 (2005). 16. Rodger, Chris, and Petch, Jason, “Uncertainty & Risk Analysis,” (1999). 17. Subramanyan, H., Sawat, Priyadarshi H., and Bhatt, V., “Construction project risk assessment: Development of Model Based on Investigation of Opinion of Construction Project Expert from India,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp 409-411 (2012). 18. Association for Project Management, Project risk analysis and management (PRAM) Guide, 2nd ed., APM Publishing, High Wycombe, (2004). 19. Fourth edition project management institute, “A guide to the project management body of knowledge” (PMBok). 20. Website of Vietnamese Ministry of Construction - www.xaydung.gov.vn/ 21. Website of The Stage Bank of Vietnam - http://www.sbv.gov.vn/wps/portal/vn 22. Website of Hanoi People’s Committees-http://www.hanoi.gov.vn/web/guest/home | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66011 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 摘要
沒有任何營建工程是沒有風險的，風險可以被控制、減少、分擔、轉化或者接受但是不能被忽略。在發展中國家例如越南，營建工程往往被視為風險極大的工程類型，其主要原因即是缺少風險管理的技能及經驗。本研究詳盡探討了一個實際的大廈專案在業主觀點下的風險管理過程，這個過程包含了風險識別、評估及處理，進而對營建工程的業主提供最好的風險管理方法與經驗。 本研究藉由文獻回顧、案例資料收集、檢查清單與專家訪談等研究方式，最終識別出本案例之風險共18種，並可將所有被識別出的風險分為兩組：“可定量風險”及“不可定量風險”分別進行評估。對第一組風險，本研究明確計算其損耗費用及工程延長時間；對第2組風險，本研究使用風險矩陣評估何者風險較高。最後本研究利用專家討論方式綜合提出因應本案例中高風險，中等風險和低風險時之策略，以做為越南業主合理有效管理大廈專案之參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | No construction project is risk free. Risk can be managed, minimized, shared, transferred, or accepted but it cannot be ignored. Especially in developing countries like Vietnam, construction projects are usually considered a high risk business, mostly because of a lack of adequate skills and experience in managing risk. This research presents the details of a study on the risk management process under owner’s perspective in a typical high rise building project. With the aim of showing risk management process including: risk identification, risk assessment, and risk response, author desires to contribute a good method and experience for owner in the construction industry.
To accomplish the research, the author reviews knowledge, tools related the subject and collection all data of case study. By check list, brainstorming and interviewing experts, 18 risks are identified. All identified risks are divided into two groups “risks can be quantified” and “risks cannot be quantified” to evaluate and assess. For the first group, the author focuses on calculating losing cost and time delay; and for the second group, matrix risk is used to assess and prioritize the risks. After assessing and evaluating all the risks, the author discusses with experts to get risk response strategies for each risk. The strategies are presented in detail with high risks, medium risks and low risks. With the response, Vietnamese owner have the effective tools to manage risks for high rise building projects. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:18:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99521258-1.pdf: 923002 bytes, checksum: 1a836ea610f467d3cd9f03aa96f3b334 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLE OF CONTENT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT i ABSTRACT ii LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF TABLES vii CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Process of urbanization and modernization in Vietnam 1 1.2 Motivation and problem statement 2 1.3 Research Objectives 4 1.4 Research scope and case study 4 1.4.1 Research scope 4 1.4.2 Case study 4 1.5 Methodology 9 1.6 Structure of thesis 10 CHAPTER 2 Literature Review 11 2.1 Definition of risk 11 2.2 Risk management process 13 2.2.1 Risk identification 17 2.2.2 Risk assessment 19 2.2.3 Risk response 21 CHAPTER 3 risk identification 25 3.1 Review risk happen in the past 25 3.1.1 Designer 26 3.1.2 Foundation contractor 26 3.1.3 Basement contractor 27 3.1.4 Management process of owner 27 3.1.5 Other risks 28 3.2 Identify risks may occur in the future 28 3.2.1 Risk from designer 29 3.2.2 Risk from contractors 30 3.2.3 Risk from owner 31 3.2.4 Risk from other source 31 CHAPTER 4 Risk assessment 32 4.1 Assess risks can be quantified 32 4.1.1 Quantify risk “Structural delay” and “Schedule optimistic” 32 4.1.2 Quantify risk “Delay in handover” and “Inflation” 35 4.1.3 Assess risk “Change order” (5 floors commercial to office) 37 4.2 Assess risks cannot be quantified 37 4.2.1 Questionnaire survey design and list of experts 37 4.2.2 Risk assessment matrix 38 4.2.3 Survey’s result 39 CHAPTER 5 Risk response 42 5.1 Objective of response management process 42 5.2 Response strategic 43 5.2.1 Strategies for risks can be quantified 43 5.2.2 Strategy for risk cannot be quantified 47 CHAPTER 6 Conclusions & Recommendations 50 6.1 Conclusions 50 6.2 Recommendations and suggestions for further studies 56 REFERENCES 57 APPENDIX 59 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 高層建築施工風險管理在越南之研究─以鑽石花冠大樓為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Risk Management for High Rise Building Construction in Vietnam – Case Study of the Diamond Flower Tower | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張陸滿(Luh-Maan Chang),陳柏翰(Po-Han Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 風險管理,業主觀點,高層建築物,設計,建造與移交階段, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Risk management,Owner’s perspective,high rise building project,design,construction and handover stage, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 64 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-06-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 901.37 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。